Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02

2012-08-13 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
. It's not my favourite outcome, but based on Dave Thaler's comment, it's the one that gets my vote. +1 /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 http://www.jacobs

Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02

2012-08-01 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
implementors may accept %en1 (when it is unambiguous) and turn it into %25en1. (Many browsers already do this kind of thing today for other characters that need escaping.) I see no value in introducing a new separator. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02.txt]

2012-07-16 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
/2012 17:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 05:19:36PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: ... OK, as a result of Dave's comments, we now say: Section 11 of RFC 4007 is updated to allow - as well as % as the preceding delimiter of a ZoneID. What we do *not* say

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02.txt]

2012-07-16 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
reading of this text was: The canonical format for the zone index _in this typedef_ is the numerical format as described in RFC 4007, Section 11.2. That is the canonical applies to the YANG typedef, not to RFC 4007 (but we use the RFC 4007 SHOULD format as the canonical format. /js -- Juergen

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02.txt]

2012-07-15 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
a users' perspective pretty much a disaster. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 http://www.jacobs-university.de

Re: Options for draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid

2012-05-11 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 07:56:43AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2012-05-10 11:39, t.petch wrote: Original Message - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de To: Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com Cc: 6man ipv6@ietf.org Sent: Tuesday

Re: Options for draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid

2012-05-08 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
in various tools and interfaces and that this might at the end even cause changes to other tools and specifications that currently are just fine with using % as a separator. Perhaps I am overly anxious but only future will tell. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

Re: Options for draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid

2012-04-29 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
not just by plain good old http and web browsers, I think we will have to find and document a common solution for this. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 http

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt

2012-03-07 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
are always consistent with IPvFuture. (But I might as well be missing something.) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 http://www.jacobs-university.de

Re: Reviews requested: draft-carpenter-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt

2012-02-07 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
allows 255 UTF-8 characters and I think it would be nice to think a moment about how these things fit together. PS: RFC 3493 only says there is a constant IF_NAMESIZE - so the socket API does not really say what the interface name size limit really is. -- Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: Reviews requested: draft-carpenter-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt

2012-02-07 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
need to think what to do about interface names that contain characters not matching the unreserved production of RFC 3986. Perhaps if all characters are digits, we can treat the value as an interface number as a last resort. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

Re: Reviews requested: draft-carpenter-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt

2012-02-07 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
*15unreserved and my understanding of unreserved is that it does not allow % escaping. So the ZoneID production should likely be changed to something like this: ZoneID = *( unreserved / pct-encoded ) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2656)

2010-12-03 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
are the wrong procedure to question working group decisions. That said, let me add that I support the decision documented in RFC 5952 (and which is also codified in RFC 6021). /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759

Re: changes to the network management section in node requirements

2010-08-20 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
-- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 http://www.jacobs-university.de/ IETF IPv6 working group mailing list

Re: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation AUTH48 change

2010-08-05 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
. For example, 2001:db8::0:1 is not acceptable, because the symbol :: could have been used to produce a shorter representation 2001:db8::1. I think this change makes it read better: s/, and used/, and it MUST be used/ /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49

Re: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation AUTH48 change

2010-08-04 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
. This is a less invasive change (and I think the WG had previously some concensus on this, but the WG chairs will know). But yes, the formally correct procedure is likely the errata approach. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1

Re: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation AUTH48 change

2010-08-04 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:44:46PM +0200, Fred Baker wrote: On Aug 4, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 05:34:39PM +0200, Fred Baker wrote: I think this is a mis-use of AUTH48; the working group has considered the draft and said what it wanted

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
of the motivations behind this work. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 http://www.jacobs-university.de

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
in many places in a textual form where the options of automated search and comparison are textual and conversion to a 128-bit binary number for comparison is often not a realistic option. Section 3 of the ID discusses some examples. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-05 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
), I might be OK with 2) if the frequency of the introduction of new WKPs is very small. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 http://www.jacobs-university.de

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-02.txt

2009-11-14 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
not matter how an address was generated when it comes to questions such as ordering of addresses. I would prefer if the wording in this document allows for the single representation approach taken in the above mentioned document. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen

Re: Consensus call on adopting draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation

2009-07-29 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
Pages : 14 Date : 2009-06-11 as a 6MAN Working Group document. Please state your opinion in favor of or against adopting this document by August 15, 2009. I am in favour. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587

Re: Review requested: draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation-02

2009-05-12 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
what is already done in many implementations. +1 The NETMOD WG is currently adopting the same format as the canonical representation of IPv6 addresses. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax

Re: RFC 4293 - ipAddressTable

2007-10-10 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
of the table objects. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 http://www.jacobs-university.de

Re: RFC 4113: Is udpEndpointInstance persistent?

2006-06-05 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
of a particular endpoint change over time? The udpEndpointInstance object is part of the INDEX. Since a row in the udpEndpointTable represents a particular endpoint, I would say this object like all other INDEX objects serves to identify an endpoint. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: RFC 4113: Is udpEndpointInstance persistent?

2006-06-05 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 05:02:33PM -0700, Anders Persson wrote: Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:26:25PM -0700, Anders Persson wrote: The udpEndpointInstance object is part of the INDEX. Since a row in the udpEndpointTable represents a particular endpoint, I would say

Re: Process id in UDP/TCP mibs?

2006-05-13 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
would have to create new tables... /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6

Re: Process id in UDP/TCP mibs?

2006-05-12 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
ids and transport endpoints. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6

Re: why 0xFFFE is used in the modified EUI-64 format

2006-01-10 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
of changes to APPENDIX A below (marked by ). I support the addition of this clarification. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-fenner-literal-zone-02.txt

2005-11-06 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
unhappy. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative

Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format?

2005-03-30 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
if it makes the procedural aspects getting it written down within the IETF more complex. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format?

2005-03-28 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
-- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https

Re: 'smicng' compiler giving error for 'IP-MIB'

2005-03-10 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
smicng. ;-) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative

Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question

2005-02-01 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
are kept in the document, I think there should be a clear warning attached about using them. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question

2005-02-01 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
the application code to work for both, IPv4 mapped address format is very useful tool. On those other socket APIs, does code which uses two sockets work or not? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-fenner-literal-zone-00.txt

2004-12-07 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
even more reasons to treat the host portion of URIs in special ways. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-fenner-literal-zone-00.txt

2004-12-07 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07.txt allows %xx notation in host part. Does someone know the actual motivation for this change? Which problem were they trying to solve by allowing %xx notation in the host part? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-fenner-literal-zone-00.txt

2004-12-06 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
and which sends a properly constructed URI including a zone ID to a box for consumption on that box. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-fenner-literal-zone-00.txt

2004-12-06 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
might be different. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-fenner-literal-zone-00.txt

2004-12-03 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
, it is widely implemented and the code is out there in customer hands. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-fenner-literal-zone-00.txt

2004-12-02 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
this is worth the effort it takes? So far, I have not seen a real-world report that zone ids are indeed needed in URIs. This _might_ come up in the future - but do we really expect to change all the already existing code for the reason that the % does not fit easily into URIs? /js -- Juergen

Re: Issue about RFC3595 - Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label

2004-12-01 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
to have a wildcard value which says do not match this header. The IPv6FlowLabelOrAny TC is exactly for this purpose. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

Re: [ipv6mib] Re: Auth48 update to TCP-MIB (draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2012-update-06.txt)

2004-08-23 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
. And this is the first time I can remember (and that I could find in my mailing list archive) that a change to generally allow zero-length InetAddress values has been proposed. Unless I hear a strong move to change the rule above, I actually prefer to stay with what we have. /js -- Juergen

Re: problem with inetCidrRouteDest/inetCidrRoutePfxLen consistency check language in draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt

2004-02-04 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
inetCidrRoutePfxLen MUST be equal to x. If not, then the index pair is not consistent and an inconsistentName error must be returned on SET or CREATE requests. This text is clearly an improvement over what has been there before. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: scope zone ID zero as the default (for revision of ipv6-scoping-arch)

2004-02-03 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
: [...] And, if I remember the discussion correctly, the consensus was we should mandate zero as the default. So, I'd like to propose the following changes: I am happy with these changes. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt

2004-02-02 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
fit into an OID subidentifier. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt

2004-02-02 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
that just 0 was removed from the set of possible values. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany IETF IPv6 working

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt

2004-02-02 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
to the objects in question that use the InetPrefixLength TC? c) Do both? I think I prefer a) at the moment. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

Re: comments on rfc2011 update

2003-12-02 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
: ipAddressRowStatus of type RowStatus. 3) Maybe changing the conformance statements to allow the optionality of the writable aspect of it. You probably also want to have a StorageType column for this. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http

Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-00.txt

2003-11-03 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
this up by at least saying the default zone SHOULD be identified by the zone index 0. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/ P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany