Yes, that did the trick. Thanks for the solution with such details!
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Vic Cross
Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 9:43 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets and
Frank wrote:
>Okay, following along in "IBM HiperSockets Implementation Guide"
>Chapter 3 "Software configurations for HiperSockets. The command
>"ifconfig enccw0.0.0800 192.168.250.88 netmask 255.255.255.0 up"
>seems to work, only temporarily.
>
>#
...specifically Clef (CentOS) 7.8. Adding hipersockets to a zLinux instance.
Okay, following along in "IBM HiperSockets Implementation Guide" Chapter 3
"Software configurations for HiperSockets. The command "ifconfig enccw0.0.0800
192.168.250.88 netmask 255.255.255.0 up&
t: Re: Problem with Hipersockets z13 SUSE 12 Sp4
>>> On 2/5/2019 at 05:00 PM, Marco Banuelos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm experiencing some problems with SLES 12 SP4 running on z/vm 7.1, I made
> a SLES 12 SP4 installation and I configured with OSA network, now the
> cus
>>> On 2/6/2019 at 05:10 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Wednesday, 02/06/2019 at 09:56 GMT, Mark Post wrote:
>
>> How did you connect the HiperSocket to the guest? Did you ATTACH the
> devices
>> to the guest? Did you DEDICATE them in the CP directory? If the
> latter,
>> you'll need to ATTA
On Wednesday, 02/06/2019 at 09:56 GMT, Mark Post wrote:
> How did you connect the HiperSocket to the guest? Did you ATTACH the
devices
> to the guest? Did you DEDICATE them in the CP directory? If the
latter,
> you'll need to ATTACH them to the guest, or logoff the guest and log it
back on.
>>> On 2/5/2019 at 05:00 PM, Marco Banuelos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm experiencing some problems with SLES 12 SP4 running on z/vm 7.1, I made
> a SLES 12 SP4 installation and I configured with OSA network, now the
> customer want's to switch from OSA to Hipersocket and the HiperSocket network
Marco,
It sounds like the hipersockets connection has not been made visible to the
Linux guest in the z/VM directory. Please verify with your z/VM administrator
that the hipersockets connection has been defined (and that there is some other
guest on that same hipersocket connection so you can
Marco I have Hipersockets with Suse 15 and Ubuntu 18 running in lpar no z/VM on
a zBC12
Sent from MI A2
On Feb. 5, 2019 10:54 p.m., Marco Banuelos wrote:
Hi all,
I'm experiencing some problems with SLES 12 SP4 running on z/vm 7.1, I made a
SLES 12 SP4 installation and I configured wit
Hi all,
I'm experiencing some problems with SLES 12 SP4 running on z/vm 7.1, I made a
SLES 12 SP4 installation and I configured with OSA network, now the customer
want's to switch from OSA to Hipersocket and the HiperSocket network it's not
showed on the SLES 12 SP4 vm, I rebooted the vm, I tri
Cornelia - thank you for your reply.
I am working from the Redbook: Virtualization Cookbook ... Volume 1 and
am finding typos in it. In this case the cio_ignore command was botched
up and included in the description before a set of steps to configure
hipersockets on RH. it should have been step
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:38:44 -0500
Phillip Gramly wrote:
I'm seconding the suggestion of using chzdev, but some additional notes
from me:
> # vmcp q v 204-206
> OSA 0204 ON NIC 0204 UNIT 000 SUBCHANNEL = 0001
> 0204 DEVTYPE HIPER VIRTUAL CHPID 01 IQD
> 0204 MAC 02-00-00-00-00-
The chzdev command also simplifies things. It's part of s390utils-base.
On 7/14/18, 06:38, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of R P Herrold"
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Phillip Gramly wrote:
> # echo 0.0.204,0.0.205,0.0.206 > /sys/bus/ccwgroup/drivers/qeth/group
> -bash: echo: writ
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Phillip Gramly wrote:
> # echo 0.0.204,0.0.205,0.0.206 > /sys/bus/ccwgroup/drivers/qeth/group
> -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>
> I'm missing something somewhere. can anybody help me?
Hi, Phillip,
Thanks for using ClefOS
1. This is just my OCD talking, but I w
I have my ClefOS system up which i initially brought up connected to
our VSWITCH (this is under zVM 6.3)
i want to set up Hipersockets using a guest LAN.
i used :
CP DEFINE LAN ZVTSMLAN OWNERID SYSTEM TYPE HIPER IP MFS 64K
and was able to connect to it from a VSE system.
Now i am
On Friday, 11/20/2015 at 02:28 GMT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
> ohhh I see what you are saying (I think so).
>
> I was thinking about standard usage of vswitch bridge so a scenario
where
> all guests have real dedicated hipersockets and vswitch has one of these
> hipersocket
On Friday, 11/20/2015 at 02:02 GMT, David Kreuter
wrote:
> Another advantage is that it uses only one hipersocket triplet whereas
> dedicated hipersocket will end up using one triplet per Linux virtual.
> You can even use the same hiper triplet on each LPAR.
> There is a limit to how many LPARs c
ohhh I see what you are saying (I think so).
I was thinking about standard usage of vswitch bridge so a scenario where
all guests have real dedicated hipersockets and vswitch has one of these
hipersockets as well. This gives hipersocket virtual machines a way to talk
to each other (via
LPAR.
There is a limit to how many LPARs can connect to the hiper. I've been
scalded by this a few times.
David
Original Message
Subject: Re: hipersockets
From: Grzegorz Powiedziuk
Date: Fri, November 20, 2015 8:47 am
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Thanks Alan.
HiperSocket VS
with
> > virtual hipersockets on linux guest.
>
> Linux guests can use real HiperSockets with the HiperSocket VSWITCH bridge
> on z/VM. Their traffic will automatically be bridged to a physical LAN
> that can be accessed by z/OS. z/OS doesn't support the HiperSocket
> te
On Thursday, 11/19/2015 at 08:35 GMT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
> I thought about doing vswitch but then AFIK I would end up with with
> virtual hipersockets on linux guest.
Linux guests can use real HiperSockets with the HiperSocket VSWITCH bridge
on z/VM. Their traffic will automat
Thanks David.
I thought about doing vswitch but then AFIK I would end up with with
virtual hipersockets on linux guest. And I've read in IBMs redbook for
oracle 12:
IBM HiperSockets™ are certified and
supported for the private network. Only a network that is configured with
*real* HiperSocke
arate chpids
then.
Thank you
Gregory
2015-11-19 15:05 GMT-05:00 Alan Altmark :
> On Thursday, 11/19/2015 at 07:38 GMT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk
> wrote:
> > From what I've learned so far, In order to achieve this, we need to have
> a
> > shared chpid between LPARS. Hip
n.
OK won't be as fast as hipersocket but it doesn't go far out of the box
either.
David Kreuter
Original Message
Subject: Re: hipersockets
From: Alan Altmark
Date: Thu, November 19, 2015 3:05 pm
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
On Thursday, 11/19/2015 at 07:38 GMT, Gr
On Thursday, 11/19/2015 at 07:38 GMT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
> From what I've learned so far, In order to achieve this, we need to have
a
> shared chpid between LPARS. Hipersockets on the same chpid can
communicate
> with each other.
Hosts using the same VLAN on the sa
I am planning to use hipersockets for internal communication between oracle
nodes in each RAC cluster (oracle nodes run in different lpars).
I've never used real hipersockets before so I am no sure if I understand
this correctly.
>From what I've learned so far, In order to achieve
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 17:26 +, Gerard Howells wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> As a result of some issues we've been seeing we're looking to implement the
> z/VM Hipersockets Early Completion queue feature in our systems. We run VM
> 6.2 with z/VSE 5.1 and a mixture of SLES
>>> On 5/29/2014 at 01:26 PM, Gerard Howells wrote:
> As a result of some issues we've been seeing we're looking to implement the
> z/VM Hipersockets Early Completion queue feature in our systems. We run VM
> 6.2 with z/VSE 5.1 and a mixture of SLES 10 SP4 and 1
Hello All,
As a result of some issues we've been seeing we're looking to implement the
z/VM Hipersockets Early Completion queue feature in our systems. We run VM 6.2
with z/VSE 5.1 and a mixture of SLES 10 SP4 and 11 SP3 guests. I know that it's
supported in SLES 11 my question
Baruch
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 12:54 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS
First of all i am glad to here it works...
The home statment order only matters with vipa addresses...
The way it works is all addresses after the vipa are sourced by it
vipa statment...
It is all in the books :-)
A few years back it was strange for me to read it as well...
Offer Baruch
On Nov 4, 2013 7:41 PM, "Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor)"
wrote:
> Offer,
>
> It does work... why on earth?
>
> I see from a packet trace that anything going
Offer,
It does work... why on earth?
I see from a packet trace that anything going to a Hipersockets address
(5.5.5.0) has a source IP address of 5.5.5.x, while anything going out normal
OSAD, leaves with the VIPA address.
What is with the HOME statement? I recall from OS390 TCPIP that the
scale.com
<http://www.dclibrary.ideascale.com>
-Original Message-
From: Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor)
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 12:01 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: RE: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS
Offer,
I have a test system... let me give it a shot.
Right now, I know for a f
mber 04, 2013 11:48 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS
Hi
You might be correct and this is a sourcevipa issue but i cant tell as i am
lacking some data...
Not many know this but the order of the home statment matters... you must place
your hiper so
>
> Pinging from z/OS to zLinux does not work, nor does traceroute yield
> anything. With all this said, I think it has something to do with the way I
> have routing set up on the z/OS side. For all OSA traffic, I use OSPF while
> for Hipersockets, I use static routing.
>
> - T
Hi Offer,
All IPtables are off, both for v4 and v6.
Pinging from z/OS to zLinux does not work, nor does traceroute yield anything.
With all this said, I think it has something to do with the way I have routing
set up on the z/OS side. For all OSA traffic, I use OSPF while for
Hipersockets, I
Nov 1, 2013 7:06 PM, "Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor)"
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> I got a good one (I think)... did I imagine this working at one point?
>
>
>
> I am not able to connect from my z/OS Hipersockets to my RHEL6.2
> Hipersockets.
>
>
>
, November 01, 2013 2:19 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS
Emmit,
That could very well be the case... I did not define a specific route for
Hipersockets in RHEL (always wondered about that). As for my z/OS, I use OSPF
for routing, but static routes for
Emmit,
That could very well be the case... I did not define a specific route for
Hipersockets in RHEL (always wondered about that). As for my z/OS, I use OSPF
for routing, but static routes for Hipersockets traffic.
;
DEVICE IUTIQDED MPCIPA
Is the request going out your default route as opposed to the hipersocket?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Diep,
David (OCTO-Contractor)
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 2:02 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets
f Of J B Mills
III
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 1:43 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS
What is the message that is telling you that you can not connect to your z/OS
hipersocket?
Regards,
J.B. Mills III
Solutions Architect
1515 Poydras Street
Suit
What is the message that is telling you that you can not connect to your
z/OS hipersocket?
Regards,
J.B. Mills III
Solutions Architect
1515 Poydras Street
Suite 1925
New Orleans, LA. 70112
Cell 614-226-0284
jmil...@us.ibm.com
"The only difference between a good day and a bad day, is your attitud
Hi Everyone,
I got a good one (I think)... did I imagine this working at one point?
I am not able to connect from my z/OS Hipersockets to my RHEL6.2 Hipersockets.
I am able to successfully initiate a connection from my RHEL6.2 Hipersockets to
my z/OS Hipersockets.
I am able to
[mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Chase,
John
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:34 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets "broke" Ethernet?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chase, John
>
> > [ snip ]
>
> Now, what's missing f
, February 27, 2013 1:34 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets "broke" Ethernet?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chase, John
>
> > [ snip ]
>
> Now, what's missing from this file that is present in the same file on
> our "golden&quo
know why that statement is missing, unless our "network guy" deleted
> it from the penguin that
> doesn't talk while he was trying to figure out Hipersockets.
>
> I also notice the "golden" copy has BOOTPROTO="static" instead of "none".
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Lee Stewart
>
> RHEL has an error where if you use system-config-network on a layer 2
> interface it "forgets" that it
> was layer 2. Reported a year ago as Bug
> 809534 - system-config-network ignores option field. No fix.
>
1"
IPV6INIT=no
USERCTL=no
[root@myPenguin ~]#
Now, what's missing from this file that is present in the same file on our
"golden" image is the statement:
OPTIONS="layer2=0 portno=0"
I don't know why that statement is missing, unless our "network guy" de
myPenguin ~]#
Now, what's missing from this file that is present in the same file on our
"golden" image is the statement:
OPTIONS="layer2=0 portno=0"
I don't know why that statement is missing, unless our "network guy" deleted it
from the penguin that doe
How are 7000-7002 defined? Seeing the directory entry would be useful too. An
error is happening before the ipl moment.
David Kreuter
Original message
From: Mark Post
Date:
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets "broke" Ethernet?
>>>
>>> On 2/26/2013 at 06:08 PM, "Chase, John" wrote:
-snip-
> Tried an "interactive" IPL and startup of the Linux vm, and saw some error
> messages that indicate we've got some misteaks [sic] in the definitions of
> the hipersockets virtual device
nd saw some error
messages that indicate we've got some misteaks [sic] in the definitions of the
hipersockets virtual devices (but after the guest is started, ifconfig shows
only the hipersockets interface as active).
Here's the VM logon of the guest
>>> On 2/26/2013 at 04:48 PM, "Chase, John" wrote:
> How do we configure Linux so that both interfaces (eth0 and hsi0) are
> configured at startup time?
Look at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 to see what is in there for
ONBOOT. For the interface to be started automatically, it shou
Hi, All,
We're just getting started with Linux (RHEL6.3) on z/VM (6.2, non-SSI). We
generally followed the "Virtualization Cookbook" published by Mike MacIsaac and
others at IBM, and got our first RHEL web server up and running. Then we tried
to define a Hipersockets netwo
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
>
> Perhaps there is a misunderstanding. I have no objection to real
> HiperSockets for backups (or any other reason) as long as you realize that
> HiperSockets consume z CPU cycles since it is the CPU that moves the data,
&g
ps there is a misunderstanding. I have no objection to real
HiperSockets for backups (or any other reason) as long as you realize that
HiperSockets consume z CPU cycles since it is the CPU that moves the data,
not the IOPs.
> If I make it simple and define unique devices to each user, how do I
I guess my main drive to use a common guest LAN was to avoid having to assign a
unique device set for each zLinux guest by specifying a SPECIAL definition in
each. The main use for the Hipersocket connections would be to run zLinux
backup/restore processing based on the MVS platform, and I theor
number for one of those
> *real* hipersockets.
> (haven't we been here before ... ;-)
The ephemeral energy-to-matter converter modules are already included at
no additional charge. ;-)
Alan Altmark
Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training
ibm.com/
On Tue, Jul 17th, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
...
> TCPIP is connected to two HiperSocket networks: one real (to MVS) and one
> virtual (to Linux).
Now, hold it right there fella. I want the order number for one of those
*real* hipersockets.
(haven't we been here before ...
On Monday, 07/16/2012 at 09:44 EDT, Mark Post wrote:
> Alternatively, he could just attach a real HiperSocket device to the
Linux
> system and cut out the middle man (z/VM TCPIP) entirely. Unless there's
some
> value to be had by having z/VM manage the traffic, it's just unnecessary
> overhead.
>>> On 7/16/2012 at 04:37 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> TCPIP is connected to two HiperSocket networks: one real (to MVS) and one
> virtual (to Linux). So TCPIP will need two HiperSocket interfaces, each
> with it's own IP address in each of the two networks. You have the real
> one (5.1.1.1), but
Linux from z/VM I
get no
> response. MVS (5.1.1.3) to VM (5.1.1.1) works fine, and visa versa.
> Any ideas?
Yes, your network diagram is messed up. Your picture is
Linux [Guest LAN] TCPIP [HiperSockets] MVS
TCPIP is connected to two HiperSocket networks: one real (to MVS) and one
virtual (to
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 04:59:49PM +, Norris, Chet wrote:
> I've defined IP/ADDR 5.1.1.1 as a VM home address, 5.1.1.3 as the MVS home
> and set up the Linux guest as 5.1.2.10.
It would be preferable if you could use RFC 1918 allocations for your legacy IP
interconnections. Just using random I
I'm not able to get any response back to my zlinux guest over a guest LAN I've
set up for Hipersocket connections.
I've defined IP/ADDR 5.1.1.1 as a VM home address, 5.1.1.3 as the MVS home and
set up the Linux guest as 5.1.2.10.
A static route for 5.1.2.0/24 has been defined under MVS to point
, 2012 8:26 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets
Another silly question from me. Is the z/Linux system using iptables to do
firewalling? I don't know what z/Linux installs as a default.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Schwartz, Rodney (R.)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:49 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Hipersockets
>
> The ping times out from both the z/os and zlinux. We have
> multipl
Correct the address of z/os is 192.168.1.11
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:13 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets
>>> On 6/26/2012 at 02:29 PM, Marcy Cortes
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets
If the OP wants to look on the z/OS side, I can think of three methods.
z/OS console command:
D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,DEVLINKS
D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,ROUTE
D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,HOME
z/OS TSO command:
NETSTAT DEVLINKS
NETSTAT ROUTE
NETSTAT HOME
z/OS UNIX command:
netstat -d
If the OP wants to look on the z/OS side, I can think of three methods.
z/OS console command:
D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,DEVLINKS
D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,ROUTE
D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,HOME
z/OS TSO command:
NETSTAT DEVLINKS
NETSTAT ROUTE
NETSTAT HOME
z/OS UNIX command:
netstat -d
netstat -r
netstat -h
The DEV
>>> On 6/26/2012 at 02:29 PM, Marcy Cortes
>>> wrote:
> "ip address is 192.169.1.11"
>
> I hope that was a typo and you meant the address of z/OS is 192.168.1.11?
One way to figure that out would be to start tcpdump on the hsi0 interface and
see what kind of IP addresses show up from other sy
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] Hipersockets
I am trying to get Hipersockets working between z/os and zlinux system (sles 10
SP2 running under z/vm 6.2). I have a dedicated IOD address attached:
OSA FB00 ATTACHED TO LINUX02 7000 DEVTYPE HIPER CHPID FB IQD
OSA FB01 ATTACHED TO LIN
I am trying to get Hipersockets working between z/os and zlinux system (sles 10
SP2 running under z/vm 6.2). I have a dedicated IOD address attached:
OSA FB00 ATTACHED TO LINUX02 7000 DEVTYPE HIPER CHPID FB IQD
OSA FB01 ATTACHED TO LINUX02 7001 DEVTYPE HIPER CHPID FB IQD
OSA
Well I finally was able to schedule a power on reset changing chparm=00
to chparm=C0 on the hipersockets iocp definition. I then added mtu=57344 to
ifcfg-hsi0, did an ifdown and ifup for hsi0. I then changed vse's tcpip
definition to mtu=57344. I conducted another test and the
-0.0.7000
> or /etc/sysconfig/network/ifcfg-hsi-bus-ccw-0.0.7000. Those are no
> longer needed for SLES11 and can be removed.
>
> Ursula
>
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:58 +0100, Roger Evans wrote:
> > Thank you, Ursula
> > That solved the problem. I can now ping and ftp
I can now ping and ftp between my layer3
> hipersockets. I still get the "Waiting for mandatory devices.
> hsi-bus-ccw-0.0.7000 No interface found " msg. when booting
> but now that it works, I'll just stop watching.
>
> You're pretty amazing. Thin
Thank you, Ursula
That solved the problem. I can now ping and ftp between my layer3
hipersockets. I still get the "Waiting for mandatory devices.
hsi-bus-ccw-0.0.7000 No interface found " msg. when booting
but now that it works, I'll just stop watching.
You&#x
Roger,
when configuring a network interface with yast, a udev-rule is created
for the device containing qeth attribute definitions, among them
attribute layer2. Look into /etc/udev/rules.d and check a rule starting
with 51-...7000... . I assume this rule contains a line with layer2=1.
Change this
Roger,
get rid of the LLADDR='00:00:00:00:00:00' definition. ifup does no
longer work for a zero MAC-address. HiperSockets define a MAC-address;
during initialization Linux determines this MAC-address and uses it, if
LLADDR is not defined.
Ursula
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 10:47 +0100, R
efering to 0.0.7000 or hsi0.
> Your hsi0-device is in state SOFTSETUP, which means it has been
> activated successfully; just the ifup step fails. The configuration file
> for ifup is /etc/sysconfig/network/ifcfg-hsi0. Can you check the
> definitions of this file?
>
> By the way, you
; By the way, you have chosen layer2=1 for your hsi0-device. This is ok,
> but it allows communication to other layer2 HiperSockets participants
> only, no layer3 HiperSockets participants.
>
> Regards, Ursula Braun, IBM Germany
>
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 08:39 +0100, Roger Evans wr
of this file?
By the way, you have chosen layer2=1 for your hsi0-device. This is ok,
but it allows communication to other layer2 HiperSockets participants
only, no layer3 HiperSockets participants.
Regards, Ursula Braun, IBM Germany
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 08:39 +0100, Roger Evans wrote:
>
Hi, Ursula
uname -a
Linux DPRODDB2 2.6.32.46-0.3-default #1 SMP 2011-09-29 17:49:31 +0200
s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
lsqeth
... [other devices]
Device name : hsi0
-
card_type : HiperSockets
cdev0
Roger,
the minimum SLES11 SP1 kernel level should be 2.6.32.29-0.3.1. If you
still have problems with a kernel level greater or equal to this one,
something else is wrong. Which qeth-related messages show up in dmesg?
What does "lsqeth" return?
Regards, Ursula Braun, IBM Germany
On Mon, 2011-11-
¬<00115d10>| sysc_noemu+0x10/0x16
> > ¬<021c8738>| 0x21c8738
> > ..done
> > Loading required kernel modules
> > ¬1A..done<6>device-mapper: ioctl: 4.7.0-ioctl (2006-06-24) initialised:
> > dm-devel
> > ...
> > ---
--
>
> I get this regardless of whether QIOASSIST is ON or OFF.
>
> Regards/
> Med vennlig hilsen
>
>
> Roger Evans
>
Roger,
the HiperSocke
Display the kernel storage at 10b03a60.8 - in there is the instruction
giving the exception. The b2220030 is the IPM used to retrieve the condition
code from the previous instruction so it can be placed in a C variable.
On 11/4/11 9:18 AM, "Roger Evans" wrote:
> Hi Sue
>
> Didn't seem to help.
Hi Sue
Didn't seem to help. When booting with SLES10v2 I see the following
when watching the boot from VM:
-
eth: IPv6 not supported on
Can you try turning off QIOASSIST for the guest and see
if that makes a difference?
Regards,
Sue Farrell
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: I
> What version of z/VM is this?
z/VM Version 5 Release 4.0, Service Level 1101 (64-bit),
> Do you have all the Linux related maintenance installed for it?
Hard to tell. Is there one place we can go to find out what is needed?
We have installed all the APARS that IBM told us were necessary to run
>>> On 11/1/2011 at 08:12 AM, Roger Evans wrote:
> SuSE 10.2
> uname returns: kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-default
That's the SLES10 SP2 GA kernel, which is 2.5 years old. I think it might be
time to apply some maintenance. :(
> I'm also trying to configure hsi0 with YAST on SuSE 11sp1
> When I try
SuSE 10.2
uname returns: kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-default
I'm also trying to configure hsi0 with YAST on SuSE 11sp1
When I try to bring the interface up with ifup, I get:
--
#ifup hsi0
hsi0 name: Hipersocket (0.
>>> On 10/31/2011 at 06:00 AM, Roger Evans wrote:
> Good morning, Mailing list
> We upgraded from a z9 to a z114 during the weekend, Most things seem
> to be working fine, but none of my linux hipersocket interfaces come
> up.
>
-snip-
> None of our VM or linux definitions have changed.
>
> T
Good morning, Mailing list
We upgraded from a z9 to a z114 during the weekend, Most things seem
to be working fine, but none of my linux hipersocket interfaces come
up.
When I try ifup hsi0, I get the following:
# ifup hsi0
hsi0
hsi0 configuration: hsi-bus-ccw-0.0.7000
SIOCSIFFLAGS:
On Tuesday, 02/01/2011 at 06:06 EST, Mark Post wrote:
> What do the US and UH flags mean? What's the reason for the host route
to
> 10.90.3.20?
U = Up (if interface is down, flag not set, route won't be used)
S = Static (i.e. human-induced config somewhere)
H = Host route
Alan Altmark
z/VM a
>>> On 1/31/2011 at 01:49 PM, Kyle Stewart
>>> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Here is what we have:
>
> The hsi0 is a real hipersocket
>
> Linux netstat
>
> [z034876@UTLZ0002 ~]$ netstat -r
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> Iface
>
>
Kyle,
please try to add line
ARP=no
to your
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-hsi0
configuration file.
Regards, Ursula
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...
On Monday, 01/31/2011 at 05:22 EST, Kyle Stewart
wrote:
> > We have been struggling trying to get our z/VM & z/OS systems to talk
via
> > hipersockets to our RHEL5.3 Linux (under z/VM 6.1). We can ping out
from
> > Linux to VM or to z/OS, but when we ping into Linu
MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM & z/OS
>>> On 1/30/2011 at 03:19 AM, Naspa wrote:
> Greetings All!
>
> We have been struggling trying to get our z/VM & z/OS systems to talk via
> hipersockets to our RHEL5.3 Linux (under z/VM 6.1). We
>>> On 1/30/2011 at 03:19 AM, Naspa wrote:
> Greetings All!
>
> We have been struggling trying to get our z/VM & z/OS systems to talk via
> hipersockets to our RHEL5.3 Linux (under z/VM 6.1). We can ping out from
> Linux to VM or to z/OS, but when we ping int
I forgot to mention that we can ping via hsi0 to /from either of the Linux
guests.
-Original Message-
From: Naspa
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 1:19 AM
To: 'Linux on 390 Port'
Subject: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM & z/OS
Greetings All!
We have been struggling
1 - 100 of 492 matches
Mail list logo
