On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 11:32:05AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> Anyway, I am rather lost now. So how to continue?
>
> 1. Which text to use as basis for further work. Mine, or Larry's?
Yours. Larry's can go into an article an
Larry, you've made some very good points. Most of the folks on the devel
list have been using LyX for a long time, and it's hard for us to look at it
from the perspective of new users, especially ones who don't even know
LaTeX.
That said, I think it's too late to stop 1.0. The LyXers have been sa
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 08:53:15AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Reuben" == Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Reuben> As well as (or perhaps instead of) specifying page ranges, it
> Reuben> should be possible to give section ranges.
>
> This would indeed be a nice thing
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 06:11:09PM -0600, Roland Krause wrote:
> Trying to build lyx-1.0.0-pre8 on my IRIX-5.3...
> When running configure it stops with
>
> pocus > ./configure --with-extra-includes=/usr/local/include
> --with-extra-lib=/usr/local/lib
>
> ...chugging away for a while
>
> ** Ca
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 10:25:47AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> Jean-Marc, didn't you do some IEEE stuff recently?
>
> No, I just commit the work of others in CVS and
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 11:46:01PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Look here:
>
> http://www.netby.net/Oest/Europa-Alle/vermeer/LyX-PR.txt
>
> Includes the effect of many of your comments up to now, but especially
> those of Roland Krause. They really helped to make things sharper.
> (I even too
Did we ever get the swedish tutorial fixed? I did a cvs update and the file
is still cut off in the middle.
-Amir
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 04:36:54PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> Gains: - simplified code in insets - we ensure that all insets
> Lars> can be output with all different writers - when adding new
> Lars> insets, the c
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 04:21:05PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> The error message in the recent windows port email is
> Amir> misspelled. s/it's/its/
>
> I thin
The error message in the recent windows port email is misspelled.
s/it's/its/
For future reference (and this is a very popular error among Americans and
non-):
"it's" is an abbreviation for "it is". You use it like "It's a
document processor, not a word processor!" Jean-Marc would say "c'est"
Forgot to attach this!
-Amir
reLyX.lyx.gz
OK. I made all of the reLyX's not bold, put menu stuff in sans serif and
macros in typewriter. A lot of that was done by hand (lame).
At the least, Mike and John should probably read this. Mike since he's the
closest thing we've currently got to a doc guy, John to check style
conformance (but try
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:53:14PM +1000, Peter Drummond wrote:
>
> No sweat - appreciate all your efforts at making RELYX work as well as it
> does! If you don't go the Tex route for a native format, has anyone
> thought about using XML - its very close to what you have got anyway, in
> syntax,
On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 11:01:16AM -0600, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> I've found that a conference I'm submitting papers to requires that
> "Attachments should be in MS Word 7.0 or WordPerfect 8.0 or lower
> version."
>
> I suppose the text can convert though latex2html or some such, bu
On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 08:42:41AM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
>I don't know whatever happened to this discussion, but I saw this on
>slashdot today: "LinuxBox.com is providing free hosting for Open Source
>developers"
>
>-Amir
>
> Open Source has a policy what is considered ope
I don't know whatever happened to this discussion, but I saw this on slashdot
today: "LinuxBox.com is providing free hosting for Open Source developers"
-Amir
The other good news is that 1.2 will be linkable with GNOME, meaning that
people will be able to make it truly GNU. Except that only their personal copy
will be gnu, because other people's copies will be linked with xforms. This is
confusing!
-Amir
One more thing. Is the current toggling stuff correctly documented in the
user's guide (or wherever)? Just looked at the User's guide and, for example,
it still says there's an OK button, and doesn't mention the old toggling
thing.
Mike (Or someone else willing to do docs)! Could you fix that, si
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 11:35:10AM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 04:33:17PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Larry" == Larry S Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Larry> What is the meaning of the new Character dialog box statements
> > Larry> about "to
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 07:02:57PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Martin (whom we all know by now is a famous linux writer)
>
> Those that can, do. Those that don't, write...
Garst would probably say that it works better poetically (or mathematically)
if you say "those that can't, write". :)
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 12:09:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Roland" == Roland Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Agreed. The code freeze is (mainly) in place, altough a few new
> features have slipped in :) We might want to delay the litterate
> programming and 'Replace all
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 09:18:56AM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 01:22:52PM -0600, Paul E. Johnson wrote:
> >
> > What am I supposed to do? Please?
>
> I think this is a prime example of a documentation problem. While
> updating the docs for the slides class, I noticed that
OK. I've made a couple changes (thanks, JMarc).
- "reLyX -- convert..." is now a \title.
- Sub and Subsub sections were moved up a level of importance. Changed
SYNOPSIS to Synopsis since it's in a big font.
- Accents work (but ligatures don't. I don't really know what to do about
those. Is
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 06:06:08PM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 02:38:21PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> > btw, I *still* think that adding magenta, blue, cyan, and green is
> > adding more colors you don't need. Why not make all slide stuff one
> >
On Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 10:18:00AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Editors' Revolt to Trim ERT) and optimizing for LyX.
>
> Is this ERTERT? :-)
Sure. Remember that I"m also a member of the Redundant Redundancy
Reduction Committee.
> url.sty is certainly one option, at least for the URLs
On Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 09:04:15AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cut and paste should be okay but raises another issue. My last doc
> submissions included a lot of "by hand" linebreaking so things would print
> well. This resulted in some ERT being inserted into various docs. I did
> this hopi
OK, thinking about the JMarc method of putting all lyx files we create in pwd
(or -o dir)...
There are a couple of different cases where we need to make sure you're not
creating two LyX files with the same name.
(1) a.tex includes foo/inc.tex and bar/inc.tex.
So the LyX filenames we create ou
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 05:03:05PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Amir> - other ideas? I'm in excited to be coding mode now, so now's
> Amir> the time for feature requests :)
>
> And what about reLyX?
Humph. I recently found out that reLyX can't find \include'd files if you run
reLyX o
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 08:55:02AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Excellent idea! And I like the result.
Yay!
>
> I wish I was so impressive I could impress myself.
Well, if you'd like, you can just be impressed by me instead. That will make
two of us :)
> Amir> Do me a favor and tak
Jean-Marc has been bugging me to make the reLyX man page into a reLyX
document, so that it could be included in the Help menu. (Of course, if
you're going to be using the fancy arguments to reLyX, then you need to
call it from the command line anyway. But of course all that will change when
Asger
Did anyone check John Weiss' slide patch in the docs (Mike)? How about
in lyx-1_0_x/lib/layouts?
By the way, I looked at the patch. John, did you misspell visible and
invisible? And did you mean the commands to be \lyxinvisible and \lyxvisible?
Because in your patch the LatexNames are lyxinvisibe
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >> But maybe you should tell me how you foreigners think :)
>
> Hey, *you* are the foreigner!
No. Maybe je suis l'étranger, or l'homme foreign, or however, you say that.
> Peter> But you're right, in the anouncement the
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 11:05:36AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> So maybe the best thing to do is say something like: "Better
> Amir> support (keyboard bindings, ke
On Wed, Jan 06, 1999 at 06:54:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> Looks pretty good. I think you should put the reLyX stuff in all
> Amir> caps since it's clearly th
On Wed, Jan 06, 1999 at 12:45:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Have a look at:
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/previous/
>
> What do you see as first article in 'News&Articles'? Yes, you've got
> it!
>
> Introduction to LyX by Ulrich Quill
>
> I did not take the time to read the art
On Wed, Jan 06, 1999 at 10:32:48AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I updated the file WHATSNEW in the distribution to reflect latest
> change. I append the result here. Could you all have a look and tell
> me what to add/remove/rewrite? In particular, I'd like to have details
> on the Linu
On Tue, Jan 05, 1999 at 11:13:38AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> > > "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Garst> OK, that worked. Bizzarr. I changed the order of Signature in
> > Garst> stdletter.inc. That works. I'll look again at t
What the two recent bug reports obviously don't understand is the new LyX
1.1 Roadmap. Remember how the LyX 1.0 docs insisted that it's better to use
layouts (logical styles) than italics (physical styles)? Well, the LyX core
developers decided after not much debate that it was time to get rid of
On Wed, Dec 23, 1998 at 07:03:56PM +0100, Joacim Persson wrote:
>
> Btw, I added a section regarding Swedish typography to sv_Intro.lyx. Some
> things in the manuals assume the user is following American or British
> conventions, so I figured I needed to explain the differences. ...and a
> short
In honor of no-smiley day, JMarc sent me a CC: again. Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 23, 1998 at 06:26:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> I of course support any and all translations o
I don't remember anyone mentioning the swedish translation effort.
Congratulations on an auspicious beginning, Joacim!
I of course support any and all translations of the Tutorial. Oh, and I guess
other manuals ought to get translated, too. (I'm bowing to the will of the
religious majority, which
should be easy,
since the format won't be too much different from book format). In the
documentation, you ought to tell people that it shouldn't be too hard to
change the rice thesis to some other kind of thesis, with a bit of hacking
(especially if they've got a school class fi
On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 01:33:43AM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote:
> Yes, where is it?
>
> Etienne
I CVS'ed it shortly after JMarc pointed out it was missing. Is it still
missing? 'cvs diff' gives me no differences, e.g.
-Amir
On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I added the files to the lyxdoc cvs.
>
> BTW, a question for Amir and you: could the example files of the
> tutorial be put in the doc/ directory? This would make things simpler
> for keeping them in lyxdoc/ cvs repository
On Sun, Dec 20, 1998 at 05:34:25PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> On another note, in my upgrading quest, something trashed TeTeX-4 as I
> was attempting to switch it to glibc. I ended up downloading the -9
> snapshot, and that fixed my problems and solved many others as well. The
> texmf.cnf is m
reLyX 2.8.1.1!
reLyX/CHANGES says:
- -o option allows you to create temp & LyX file(s) in a given output directory
Eventually settled on -o outputdir instead of -o outfilename. There are
various problems. Two for example: what if you use -p with a number of files?
And what if your file includes
If I have \use_tempdir false, then lyx uses . for creating its temporary
files. I recently realized that if I relyx a.tex, and then edit a.lyx with
use_tempdir false, then a.tex will be overwritten. I wrote "bug report?" with
the question mark because I'm not sure there's anything we can do about
On Wed, Dec 16, 1998 at 03:11:41PM +0100, Peter Suetterlin wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> We (Leif Albers, Hartmut Haase Jens Stolze and I) have finished a major
> update of (at least a part of) the german translation of the LyX
> Documentation.
Congratulations! That's really great.
I love german---
made a few fixes. A couple "version 1.0" bugs. (e.g., "we'll try to fix this
by version 1.0"). I wrote "1.1" for a later version. Was I supposed to write
"1.2"? Or should I have written "in a later version"? The good news is that a
grep for 1.0 and 0.12 didn't yield any other obvious version
bugs
On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 09:04:21AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Still trying to figure out how to get this onto the LyX Web page ... who
> is the maintainer?
Sigh. We don't really have one. Asger is sort of doing it, but he said he's on
the other side of the country for a while. It
On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 02:57:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> | However, note that we still need to write the temporary files. We
> | *can* write them in /tmp, but alternatively, we can just write them
> | to tmp_dir. Since they're erased anyway (unless you're running with
>
> One
On Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 11:40:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Anyway I think that making LyX able to read from stdin is the wrong
> solution (I am not even sure that it would work). This kind of problem
> should be solved with something similar to popen(3), will most likely
> be most e
On Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 08:55:08PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> *Asger Alstrup Nielsen writes:
> | Of course we can choose not to fix the bug and document it in Bugs
> | instead for 1.0.0. And then fix it in 1.0.1 (or simply not fix it
> | in the 1.0.x series, but the bug report involved
On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 11:45:09AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Peter" == Peter Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Peter> (2) If you IMPORT a \tilde{\textbf A} combination from a valid
> Peter> latex equation, reLyx modifies it to an invalid latex file,
> Peter> which generat
On Sun, Dec 13, 1998 at 12:33:24PM +0100, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
[Lars said:]
> > I don't think you want 1.0 released. You keep suggestin and wanting to
> > implement new things all the time...
>
> I see.
>
> The problem at hand originated in a bug report, that if it was to be fixed,
> wo
On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 03:00:12PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems that the best for us would be to bundle a scripting
> language.
>
> In order to avoid having to implement our own language from
> scratch, it might make sense to start with something and
> hack that to s
On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 12:01:09PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>
> I certainly have not read this list for a while... a newsreader within
> LyX? Are you serious? I was under the impression that LyX was intended
> to be an easy-to-use front end to LaTeX, not an 'eierlegende
> Wollmilchsau'... som
On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Hmmm, I think that reLyX should put its temporary files in /tmp just
> like any program does. What is your problem with that?
I suppose I could. I assume /tmp is guarantted to exist on any architecture
we're running reLyX
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 12:30:20PM -0600, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Amir Karger wrote:
>
> Ahem, we have not yet decided for phyton. The point of Lars post, AIUI,
> is to improve the lyxserver to be able to try it with more script
> languages.
I ag
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 06:36:12PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I imagine that several of the functions in LyXFunc really should be
> written using the script language instead. So that we only have the
> basic commands implemented in C++ and the compound(?) ones written in
> scripts.
>
> f
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 06:55:16PM +0100, Emmanuel GUREGHIAN wrote:
> Hello
>
> In the matrix dialog there are 2 xforms val-sliders for lines and the
> columns :
>
> ||
> | [==line-valslider==] [centering] |
> | [=colums valsli
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 06:37:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> *Richard E Hawkins Esq writes:
> | hmm. I managed to install 1.1 source, I think. I figured out to
> | run autoconf to get configure (though the instructions seem to
> | imply that this somehow happens automatically).
>
>
(Note to devvies: I've put a LyX feature-request below, so don't hit "d" yet)
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 02:54:38PM +0100, Sven Kopp wrote:
> SuSe Linux 2.0.35
> XFree86 3.3.3
> LyX 1.0.0pre2
> SCSI-Disks
> ---
> Hi folks,
>
> trying to import a LaTeX-File (with included
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 01:01:41PM +0100, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> The "only" serious problem is to decide whether Python should be mandatory
> or optional. (We have to solve this problem for any scripting language
> which can't be included in the distribution.)
>
I don't *really* thin
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 11:03:34AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I know it's not Friday yet, but forgive me for wasting bandwidth
> with something as simple as bragging.
Well, the truth is, we wouldn't want to confine all of our bandwidth-wasting
to just one day. I think Frida
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 10:03:44AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> > 1) Perl is much more widespread than python, and even more so compared to
> > guile and other languages that the non-computer science folks among us have
> > never heard of. (I've heard of SWIG, and I agree that it would
On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 03:09:58PM -0600, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> > Another serious candidate is Perl, which is more widespread than Python,
> > but I fear the syntax of the language will scare people from trying to
> > use it.
>
>
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 12:31:19AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> How mature is this support now in the lates prerelease?
>
> Is there anything that is _badly_ needed before 1.0?
Well, I really wanted to put figure support into reLyX for 1.0. I feel like
reLyX is the last "major standard
On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 09:13:42AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > - There were a few places where you put the lyx shot & the dvi shot on
> > separate lines. IMO, every time except the very first, they ought to go on
>
> Hmm, they are always supposed to be next to each other. Can you poi
On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 07:32:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello everybody,
[Everbody: ] Hi, Mike.
(Hope the cold is better, since it's now served its purpose of getting you to
finish the lgt :)
> Lars has put my first whack at the "graphical tutorial" at
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 05:50:21PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> My energy level is approaching rapidly zero.
Wow. Someone really needs a weekend.
Speaking of insults, I haven't gotten a single one from Asger yet today. I'm
feeling abandoned...
-Amir
ps as far as José's response (which I
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 05:44:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Agreed. I'll put them back in.
Yay! I didn't even have to send fifteen long e-mails to win the argument!
-Amir
ps it being friday, I'll remind you that you should be using a mailer that
doesn't send a cc: back to me...
pps i
On Fri, Dec 04, 1998 at 05:33:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> In fact, the change has been made because, under reasonable
> conditions, paragraphs and subparagraphs are not numbered. However,
> now that I think a bit more about it, they will be numbered provided
> that secnumdepth is
When I load up a revtex file with the latest lyx, I get an error message that
it can't delete the Subparagraph* style. Which makes sense, because there's a
NoStyle Subparagraph* in revtex.layout, but stdstarsections.inc no longer
contains the Subparagraph* environment. I checked CVSweb, but I gues
I was looking at bug 23, which is subfigures. I actually was trying to use
subfigures yesterday, except with tables, and it failed completely.
The basic issue is that subfigures shouldn't be in the figure popup.
Subfigures are really sub*floats*, because you're allowed to have subfigures
and subt
(The only problem with writing long emails is that the people who write short
ones answer questions faster. Oh well.)
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 02:24:14PM -0600, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> I can't find this in the documentation, either.
>
> I have found a sample thesis, with about 3 .sty
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 02:16:45PM -0600, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
> >
> > I just did rm -rf lyx0_12 and cvs co lyx-1.0. It's ugly, but it works.
>
> I think I need another hint :)
>
> One of the machines didn't even have cvs installed (i suppose I just
> coppied the source tree from the
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 08:41:05PM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
> The following is a patch to the layout file and template file for the
> slides class. I've made the following improvements:
>
> Environment "End All Slides" deprecated.
>This now occurs automatically at the end of the document
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 01:31:49PM -0600, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> OK, I can't figure this out now. I forgot the instructions for CVS,
> and I can't find them on the new pages.
>
> I still have an older lyx0_12. how do I update this to lyx-1.0?
I just did rm -rf lyx0_12 and cvs co
On Sat, Nov 28, 1998 at 12:41:42PM +0100, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> > Attached is a slightly changed README. I'm too afraid to actually check it
> in.
>
> Don't be. One of the advantages of cvs is that it's relatively easy to undo
> changes.
Alright, you asked for it. I committed a new ver
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 04:12:09PM -0600, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> amir aspirated,
>
> > Alright, JMarc, you only get one warning, since it's friday and both you and
> > Asger just sent double-mails. Beware my insultatory wrath. (Beware also my
> > creative vocabulary skills.)
>
> > Y
On Fri, Nov 27, 1998 at 04:37:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hmmm, I cannot get short titles on top of page... Moreover, in the
> topnav version, it would be nice to have a line for navigate, and one
> for customi
On Thu, Nov 26, 1998 at 01:10:23PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> You asked to be able to customize the web site to suit your
> strange ideas for a good web-site.
>
> So I implemented it.
>
> There's a demo of this FASCINATING technology on the web now.
Pretty neat.
>
>Try these li
On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 at 06:09:29PM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 1998 at 10:33:26PM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
>
> Maybe on one of the newfangled web pages under production we can show Lyx
> running on top of (and obscuring only a *portion* of) a gv window
> displaying a fully ren
Well, for the first time since 11.something, I've compiled a development
version. I'm very impressed with myself!
The bad news is, I had to get rid of -ansi to compile. Apparently, fileno()
and struct sigaction and maybe one other thing I forgot are considered
non-ansi by my SGI.
The other bad n
So Mate (or should I say "Máté :) sent me a file to reLyX. reLyX
(surprisingly!) didn't completely choke on it. Fortunately for me, a lot of
the issues it brings up have nothing to do with reLyX.
First, a small bug report. Open a doc, select Title layout, type
Line 1 C-Return
Line 2 C-R
On Mon, Nov 23, 1998 at 05:41:51PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> The problem is that when I send mail to the list, lazy people
> Amir> like Asger and Jean-Marc just hit &
On Sun, Nov 22, 1998 at 08:32:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> *Amir Karger writes:
> | Hey, Mate, what are the chances you could fix ezmlm so it doesn't
> | send a message to someone if their personal address is in the To:
> | field? I'm concerned that I'll
601 - 688 of 688 matches
Mail list logo
