On 11/24/19 9:35 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2019-11-22, gwes wrote:
First, why is your workload causing swapping? That hasn't been
a good idea since the beginning of computing.
Even if the main workload is OK, relinking the kernel (reorder_kernel)
causes swapping on smaller-memory systems.
On 2019-11-22, gwes wrote:
> First, why is your workload causing swapping? That hasn't been
> a good idea since the beginning of computing.
Even if the main workload is OK, relinking the kernel (reorder_kernel)
causes swapping on smaller-memory systems.
> I've never seen an Alix so this may be i
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 23:54, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> wait until you see the next thing i'm interested in. modern
> machines will barely notice it, but alix's will quake.
I look forward to what’s in store.
As for all the other helpful comments (from Theo and others), thank you. The
worklo
those for swap. Despite different attempts
(setting the mount_opts to xx, setting mount_opts to “priority=1”), I can’t
seem to prevent the swap on the boot disk being added with priority = 0.
Can I do anything to turn it off or change the priority, short of changing the
filesystem type?
Thanks
he default layout on a 2G compact flash drive has. So, I got some 1G
> > USB thumb drives, and want to use JUST those for swap. Despite different
> > attempts (setting the mount_opts to xx, setting mount_opts to
> > “priority=1”), I can’t seem to prevent the swap on the boot dis
Sean Kamath wrote:
> > On Nov 21, 2019, at 09:55, Kenneth Gober wrote:
> > ...
> > The need for more swap may be related to kernel relinking -- it might be an
> > interesting experiment to see if your existing swap space is enough with
> > kernel relinking disabled.
>
> Yes, precisely.
>
> I d
me 1G
> USB thumb drives, and want to use JUST those for swap. Despite different
> attempts (setting the mount_opts to xx, setting mount_opts to “priority=1”),
> I can’t seem to prevent the swap on the boot disk being added with priority =
> 0.
>
> Can I do anything to turn
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 09:55, Kenneth Gober wrote:
> ...
> The need for more swap may be related to kernel relinking -- it might be an
> interesting experiment to see if your existing swap space is enough with
> kernel relinking disabled.
Yes, precisely.
I did add some larger CF cards on machi
gt; attempts (setting the mount_opts to xx, setting mount_opts to
> “priority=1”), I can’t seem to prevent the swap on the boot disk being
> added with priority = 0.
>
> Can I do anything to turn it off or change the priority, short of changing
> the filesystem type?
I wouldn't.
(setting the mount_opts to xx, setting mount_opts to “priority=1”), I can’t
seem to prevent the swap on the boot disk being added with priority = 0.
Can I do anything to turn it off or change the priority, short of changing the
filesystem type?
Thanks,
Sean
on HDD in OpenBSD (Part I)
>
> at:
>
>
> https://www.s-vp.com/blog/post/how-to-repair-bad-sectors-on-hdd-in-openbsd-part-i
>
> Question 1:
> Is it possible to repair "wd0a"?
> Do I need another boot disk to do the repair?
> I'm in the process o
le to repair "wd0a"?
Do I need another boot disk to do the repair?
I'm in the process of building another boot disk with the identical OpenBSD
version. I'm assuming it will take less time this way since I can copy the
settings from a backup.
Question 2:
Once I build the n
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:32:44AM -0500, ji...@devio.us wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:33:54PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:12:26AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> > > Should have kernel automatically create 'sd4' for degraded RAID 1
> > > but it does not?
> >
> > I be
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:32:44AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:33:54PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:12:26AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> > > Should have kernel automatically create 'sd4' for degraded RAID 1
> > > but it does not?
> >
> > I believe it
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:33:54PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:12:26AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> > Should have kernel automatically create 'sd4' for degraded RAID 1
> > but it does not?
>
> I believe it will auto assemble if the disk is present at boot time.
^^ This do
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:12:26AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> Should have kernel automatically create 'sd4' for degraded RAID 1
> but it does not?
I believe it will auto assemble if the disk is present at boot time.
But not when you hotplug the disk.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:55:21PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:23:10PM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> > I have a disk which used to be boot disk of a degraded RAID 1 (softraid).
> > The second disk is totally gone.
> >
> > I don't want
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:23:10PM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> I have a disk which used to be boot disk of a degraded RAID 1 (softraid).
> The second disk is totally gone.
>
> I don't want to use this disk as RAID 1 disk anymore, just to get data
> from it.
>
> I'm as
I have a disk which used to be boot disk of a degraded RAID 1 (softraid).
The second disk is totally gone.
I don't want to use this disk as RAID 1 disk anymore, just to get data
from it.
I'm asking because when I plugged the disk, bioctl said 'not enough disks'.
Do we real
My HP Proliant D140 G3 running 4.9 CURRENT.MP with one modification
(lowered UDMA mode, see just below) lost its softraid RAID1 volume - it
will not be brought online at boot. Can someone tell me if it's
possible, and how, to bring this volume up from what I think is a
softraid partition that stil
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, PJ wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>> PJ, you wrote (in part) "I already posted wherefrom - openBSD ftp
>> site; the burning was done exaactly the same as for the FreeBSD and
>> many other files without ever having any problems... and I mean, EVER
>> !"
>>> I'd say you are m
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Chris Dukes wrote:
>
> Noone in their right mind installs an operating system just to install
> an operating system. For the matter, noone in their right mind uses
> a computer to just use a computer.
> There are rational human oriented end goals for which installin
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:20:37PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> Chris Dukes wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:54:12PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> > [ A lot of crap snipped ]
> >
> > Phil,
> > You failed to answer the question.
> > "What the hell is your end goal?"
> >
> > I have a simpler question for you.
> > Ar
r help? or if it's about setting up
> OpenBSD, it's that I need an OS that is functional and reliable and
> more-or-less user friendly. MS is out as it is non of the above (user
> friendly, maybe if you're an idiot). FreeBSD used to be great but just
> slid downhill... Linux is to
Michael wrote:
> PJ, you wrote (in part) "I already posted wherefrom - openBSD ftp
> site; the burning was done exaactly the same as for the FreeBSD and
> many other files without ever having any problems... and I mean, EVER
> !"
>
> If burning files or images worked before, why should we think it
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Michael wrote:
>
> If burning files or images worked before, why should we think it
> was/is an hardware or bios problem?
You obviously did not install the ESP dependency for the FREE HELP DESK
package. Can someone please check the ports tree?
-Tai
--
http://w
> > >> I've managed by myself so far
> That's the wierdest idea of "by myself" I've ever seen.
> Go back to your cup holder.
Please, cupholders deserve a quiet life, too.
PJ, you wrote (in part) "I already posted wherefrom - openBSD ftp
site; the burning was done exaactly the same as for the FreeBSD and
many other files without ever having any problems... and I mean, EVER
!"
If burning files or images worked before, why should we think it
was/is an hardware or bios
> >> I've managed by myself so far
That's the wierdest idea of "by myself" I've ever seen.
Go back to your cup holder.
Bret S. Lambert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:24:21PM -0400, PJ wrote:
>
>> I've managed by myself so far
>>
>
> Except, really, you haven't, because you apparently (unless I've missed
> something)
You did miss everything... if you were paying attention and not
emotionally hyped up (I
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:24:21PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> I've managed by myself so far
Except, really, you haven't, because you apparently (unless I've missed
something) still can't make a bootable .iso. You come in and ask what are
charitably described as ignorant questions, immediately blaming ever
t is functional and reliable and
> more-or-less user friendly. MS is out as it is non of the above (user
> friendly, maybe if you're an idiot). FreeBSD used to be great but just
> slid downhill... Linux is too spread-out and has too many threads... I
> don't care for their confusing
Chris Dukes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:54:12PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> [ A lot of crap snipped ]
>
> Phil,
> You failed to answer the question.
> "What the hell is your end goal?"
>
> I have a simpler question for you.
> Are you too incompetent to answer a question like "What the hell is
> your
if you're an idiot). FreeBSD used to be great but just
slid downhill... Linux is too spread-out and has too many threads... I
don't care for their confusing philosophies... I haven't looked at
NetBSD but have heard of it and I like what I heard about OpenBSD from Neal.
Now what is the pu
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:54:12PM -0400, PJ wrote:
[ A lot of crap snipped ]
Phil,
You failed to answer the question.
"What the hell is your end goal?"
I have a simpler question for you.
Are you too incompetent to answer a question like "What the hell is
your end goal?"
A) Yes
B) No
C) I don't k
neal hogan wrote:
>>> Temper, temper.
>>>
>>>
>> If anyone had taken seriously all the problems and hormanure I have had
>> to put up with for the last two they would have either gone out and done
>> something stupid to someone else or to themselves... I have to vent my
>> frustrations so
files that were
important (php and mysql data files) and prepared to start installing
OpenBSD.
Well, I suddenly found myself with an impossible situation: impossible
to boot from the server on which I had just installed a brand new dvd/cd
drive.
I regrettably thought that the problem was with the bo
Phil,
After looking through your belligerence here and through
http://marc.info/?a=11841782285&r=1&w=2
I have one question, what the hell is your end goal?
As far as I can determine, getting OpenBSD or FreeBSD to run
is only a perceived line item to that goal. Ditto for learning PHP.
My cur
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:18 -0400, "STeve Andre'" wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 20:40:50 Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > The OpenBSD community is a very fun and helpful bunch. But we're not
> > > good at suffering fools or assholes.
> >
> > Oh come now... we are very good at making fools and assh
Marcus Watts , misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: boot disk ???
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:40:50 -0600
> The OpenBSD community is a very fun and helpful bunch. But we're not
> good at suffering fools or assholes.
Oh come now... we are very good at making fools and assholes suffer.
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 20:40:50 Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > The OpenBSD community is a very fun and helpful bunch. But we're not
> > good at suffering fools or assholes.
>
> Oh come now... we are very good at making fools and assholes suffer.
What I want to know is why we haven't heard from Gru
PJ wrote:
This is a great start for a new system.
Temper, temper.
If anyone had taken seriously all the problems and hormanure I have had
to put up with for the last two they would have either gone out and done
something stupid to someone else or to themselves... I have to vent my
frus
> >I saw your post on that list, and I knew he was coming, so I shipped
> >out a broken snapshot to cause him harm, on purpose.
Be sure to let us know if it i being reccommended on freebsd or linux lists
in the next week and we filesystem developers will try to make sure the tree
is well and trul
> The OpenBSD community is a very fun and helpful bunch. But we're not
> good at suffering fools or assholes.
Oh come now... we are very good at making fools and assholes suffer.
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:25:25PM -0500, neal hogan wrote:
> > > Temper, temper.
> > >
> > If anyone had taken seriously all the problems and hormanure I have had
> > to put up with for the last two they would have either gone out and done
> > something stupid to someone else or to themselves..
> > Temper, temper.
> >
> If anyone had taken seriously all the problems and hormanure I have had
> to put up with for the last two they would have either gone out and done
> something stupid to someone else or to themselves... I have to vent my
> frustrations somewhere and whatever got in the w
PJ wrote:
It really pisses me off that everyone assumes that the poor sap who is
asking for help is too stupid to have done things right and they just
forget that maybe the problem is in the SOURCE !
I know what a bootable image usually looks like... but neither of those
I downloaded look right.
Marcus Watts wrote:
> PJ writes:
> ...
>
>> It's not I who is having problems. I think it's OpenBSD.
>>
>
> Assigning blame before resolving the problem is counter-productive.
>
>
>> It doesn't take much to look at the contents of the ISO file and see
>> that it won't boot. But I guess
Nick Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:08 PM, PJ wrote:
>
>> Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>>
>
>
>> It really pisses me off that everyone assumes that the poor sap who is
>> asking for help is too stupid to have done things right and they just
>> forget that maybe the problem is
PJ writes:
...
> It's not I who is having problems. I think it's OpenBSD.
Assigning blame before resolving the problem is counter-productive.
>
> It doesn't take much to look at the contents of the ISO file and see
> that it won't boot. But I guess I'm a glutton for frustration and I was
> jus
> > WOW! You are an over-reacting baby!
> >
> > I want to apologize to the oBSD community for suggesting that this guy
> > move to oBSD. He indicated that he was having difficulties with fBSD
> > (for years) on an fBSD mailing-list and I thought I'd lend a hand. I'm
> > sorry that I did.
>
> I sa
Nick Bender wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:08 PM, PJ wrote:
> > Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> >> Once you've cleared that hurdle, It would help a lot with
> more details
> >> about the hardware, what image file you are using and where it came
> >> from (ie is it the i386 one, the amd64 one, off
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> PJ writes:
>
>>> The first question should probably be, did you verify that the .iso
>>> file matched the checksum before you burned it to disk?
>> Checksums match!
>
> Show me. I need to see the exact command and any output.
>
Before
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:08 PM, PJ wrote:
> Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>> Once you've cleared that hurdle, It would help a lot with more details
>> about the hardware, what image file you are using and where it came
>> from (ie is it the i386 one, the amd64 one, off an official mirror
>> site, or
PJ writes:
>> The first question should probably be, did you verify that the .iso
>> file matched the checksum before you burned it to disk?
> Checksums match!
Show me. I need to see the exact command and any output.
> I already posted wherefrom - openBSD ftp site; the burning was done
> exaa
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:08:33PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> I know what a bootable image usually looks like... but neither of those
> I downloaded look right.
> Unless, of course the booting is supposed to be done in some
> incomprehesible way from some other operating system in some mysterious
> way tha
PJ wrote:
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
PJ writes:
Once you've cleared that hurdle, It would help a lot with more details
about the hardware, what image file you are using and where it came
from (ie is it the i386 one, the amd64 one, off an official mirror
site, or something different) and what a
> > having any problems... and I mean, EVER !
> > > Burning CD images to DVD media does not always work,
> > > for example (probably a stupid one that risks insistent
> > > contradictions, but well,), so any detail you supply could be helpful
> > > in sorting out whatever the problem is.
> > It r
> having any problems... and I mean, EVER !
> > Burning CD images to DVD media does not always work,
> > for example (probably a stupid one that risks insistent
> > contradictions, but well,), so any detail you supply could be helpful
> > in sorting out whatever the problem is.
> It really pisses
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:08 PM, PJ wrote:
> Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> It really pisses me off that everyone assumes that the poor sap who is
> asking for help is too stupid to have done things right and they just
> forget that maybe the problem is in the SOURCE !
> I know what a bootable image
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, PJ wrote:
> It's not I who is having problems. I think it's OpenBSD.
I think you're not trying to help yourself.
Even you beeing ironic in your first message, people are trying to help.
--
Daniel Bolgheroni
FEI - Faculdade de Engenharia Industrial
http://www.dbolgheroni.eng.
PJ wrote:
Unless, of course the booting is supposed to be done in some
incomprehesible way from some other operating system in some mysterious
way that is not spelled out anywhere where I can find it, anyway. :-)
You've done it wrong. Sure as eggs are eggs you did it wrong. Promise!
Sorry, bu
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> PJ writes:
>
>
>> Burning the iso image of install45.iso does not create a bootable disk.
>>
>
> Strange. The installNN.iso images are definitely meant to be bootable.
> When I have not had easy access to a real CD set, I have at times
> booted and installed m
PJ writes:
> It doesn't take much to look at the contents of the ISO file and see
> that it won't boot.
Assuming you're not just trolling, this sounds very much like a
corrupted download. They *do* happen from time to time.
Check whether your .iso file matches the MD5 checksum listed in the
M
> It doesn't take much to look at the contents of the ISO file and see
> that it won't boot. But I guess I'm a glutton for frustration and I was
> just laughing at myself.
> Now what.
> This is a great start for a new system.
Your attitude stinks. Good luck with life.
STeve Andre' wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 15:15:13 PJ wrote:
>
>> What am I missing here?
>> Burning the iso image of install45.iso does not create a bootable disk.
>> This is not a very good beginning for someone who has just decided to
>> trash FreeBSD.
>> FBSDs disks boot with no prob
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 15:15:13 PJ wrote:
> What am I missing here?
> Burning the iso image of install45.iso does not create a bootable disk.
> This is not a very good beginning for someone who has just decided to
> trash FreeBSD.
> FBSDs disks boot with no problem...
It would help very much
PJ wrote:
What am I missing here?
Burning the iso image of install45.iso does not create a bootable disk.
Yes, it does.
This is not a very good beginning for someone who has just decided to
trash FreeBSD.
FBSDs disks boot with no problem...
As do properly created OpenBSD boot disks.
Give u
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:15:13PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> What am I missing here?
> Burning the iso image of install45.iso does not create a bootable disk.
It's gotta be something you're doing, for 4.5 has been around for a
while (since May) and would have been fixed by now, if it were a
problem.
> T
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:15:13PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> What am I missing here?
> Burning the iso image of install45.iso does not create a bootable disk.
> This is not a very good beginning for someone who has just decided to
> trash FreeBSD.
> FBSDs disks boot with no problem...
>
it would help if
PJ writes:
> Burning the iso image of install45.iso does not create a bootable disk.
Strange. The installNN.iso images are definitely meant to be bootable.
When I have not had easy access to a real CD set, I have at times
booted and installed machines from disks burned from those files, so I
sus
What am I missing here?
Burning the iso image of install45.iso does not create a bootable disk.
This is not a very good beginning for someone who has just decided to
trash FreeBSD.
FBSDs disks boot with no problem...
--
HervC) Kempf: "Pour sauver la planC(te, sortez du capitalisme."
-
72 matches
Mail list logo
