Documentation

I know there is some good reference material for mod_perl out there, just can't remember where. Anybody?

Re: Documentation

> I know there is some good reference material for mod_perl out there, just > can't remember where. Anybody? http://perl.apache.org/guide/ Best regards, Axel

mod_perl documentation

What format are the documentation files (INSTALL, README, SUPPORT, etc) in, and why are they not in plain text format?? It's giving me a headache trying to read them. This is horidly evil(IMO), might i suggest that you distribute documentation in standard text format, so that everyone can

PDF documentation

Hello list, Does anyone have a working link to a pdf version (mod_perl 1.27) of the guide? Found one in the archives that no longer works... I tried cvs'ing the data and doing the build deal referenced on perl.apache.org, but I'm missing something as I get an error from DocSet/Util.pm. It's

[mp2] Documentation

Hi - I'm getting frustrated. I'm trying to parse the incoming uri (url) in mod_perl 2, and I can't seem to be able to find documentation. For example, Nick gave me the following snippet of code last week: my $uri = APR::URI->parse($r->pool, $r->construct_url); $ur

mod_accel English documentation

Danil Pismenny had begun to translate into English mod_accel documentation: http://dapi.chaz.ru/articles/mod_accel.xml?lang=en Please send him ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) corrections. If you don't understand some translation at all ask me. Igor Sysoev

Re: mod_perl documentation

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, peteman wrote: > What format are the documentation files (INSTALL, README, SUPPORT, etc) > in, and why are they not in plain text format?? It's giving me a > headache trying to read them. This is horidly evil(IMO), might i > suggest that you distribute

documentation for mod_auth_mysql

all- i am having no luck locating the documentation for mod_auth_mysql.  any help would be greatly appreciated. thanks in advance- grant Grant Babb  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data Junction Corporation   Phone: (512) 459-1308 2201 Northland Dr.  Fax: (512) 459

mod_perl module documentation

It has long frustrated me that there was no mod_perl module documentation, in the style of the standard Apache module documentation. I don't mean to bash the docs that are there - clearly, they are of exceptional quality. But I wanted something like the standard module docs. So, rather

guide pdf documentation

Hello list, Does anyone have a working link to a pdf version (mod_perl 1.27) of the guide? Found one in the archives that no longer works... I tried cvs'ing the data and doing the build deal referenced on perl.apache.org, but I'm missing something as I get an error from DocSet/Util.pm. It's

Re: [mp2] Documentation

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi - > > I'm getting frustrated. I'm trying to parse the > incoming uri (url) in mod_perl 2, and I can't > seem to be able to find documentation. For > example, Nick gave me the following snippet > of code last w

Re: [mp2] Documentation

On 10 Mar 2003 at 10:07, Nick Tonkin wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > I'm getting frustrated. I'm trying to parse the > > incoming uri (url) in mod_perl 2, and I can't > > seem to be able to find

Re: [mp2] Documentation

Nick Tonkin wrote: On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi - I'm getting frustrated. I'm trying to parse the incoming uri (url) in mod_perl 2, and I can't seem to be able to find documentation. For example, Nick gave me the following snippet of code last week: [...] Hav

Re: [mp2] Documentation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll get this project out the door, and start with an 'all-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-uri-parsing' tutorial. Give me 1 week. Great Beau! Though make sure that you write it in pod, and not HTML ;) If you have any questions regarding format please ask (preferrably on the

Re: [mp2] Documentation

On 11 Mar 2003 at 10:24, Stas Bekman wrote: > Nick Tonkin wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >>Hi - > >> > >>I'm getting frustrated. I'm trying to parse the > >>incoming uri (url) in mod

mod_proxy caching documentation

Hi, After struggling with trying to figure out mod_proxy's caching algorithm and noting from the list archive's that others had, too -- and due to the dearth of existing documentation on the subject -- I came up with some documentation below by sifting through the source code. Most o

re: mod_auth_mysql usage/documentation

all- I think I found it.  Can someone take a gander at http://www.cgi101.com/class/password/mod_auth_mysql.html and let me know if this is current/correct? thanks. Grant Babb  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data Junction Corporation   Phone: (512) 459-1308 2201 Northland Dr.    

Re: documentation for mod_auth_mysql

>>>>> "GB" == Grant Babb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GB> i am having no luck locating the documentation for GB> mod_auth_mysql.  any help would be greatly appreciated. thanks in GB> advance- grant mod_auth_mysql is not implemented in mod_perl, so I&

Re: mod_perl module documentation

Rich Bowen wrote: > It has long frustrated me that there was no mod_perl module > documentation, in the style of the standard Apache module documentation. > I don't mean to bash the docs that are there - clearly, they are of > exceptional quality. But I wanted something like th

Re: mod_perl module documentation

On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:30:47PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote: > It has long frustrated me that there was no mod_perl module > documentation, in the style of the standard Apache module documentation. > I don't mean to bash the docs that are there - clearly, they are of > exception

Re: mod_perl module documentation

Just speaking as a mod_perl user/developer, I think the format of Rich's docs is excellent. Since these are directives that belong in httpd.conf, it makes sense for their documentation to look like the documentation of other non-perl directives that belong in httpd.conf. Organization

Re: mod_perl module documentation

At 13:30 18.06.2002 -0400, you wrote: >http://www.apacheadmin.com/mod_perl.html Great. I explicitely missed this before. Especially the context information is useful if you have to do things via .htaccess as much as possible. Thanx, Joachim -- "... ein Geschlecht erfinderischer Zwerge, die fue

Re: guide pdf documentation

Rich Duzenbury wrote: > Hello list, > > Does anyone have a working link to a pdf version (mod_perl 1.27) of the > guide? Found one in the archives that no longer works... sorry, I was working around the problems on apache.org and changing the auto-build script and the pdf build was broken. It

Re: guide pdf documentation

Quoting Rich Duzenbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello list, > > Does anyone have a working link to a pdf version (mod_perl 1.27) of the > guide? Found one in the archives that no longer works... i found this one perl.apache.org->documentation->mod_perl 1.0 Docume

Re: guide pdf documentation

Thanks. I didn't see the [pdf] button! >>I tried cvs'ing the data and doing the build deal referenced on >>perl.apache.org, but I'm missing something as I get an error from >>DocSet/Util.pm. It's trying to load Template.pm on line 13, but I don't >>have a Template.pm on my system anywhere.

Documentation for Apache::exit()?

"Terminating requests and processes..." that also discusses the need to use Apache::exit() instead of Perl's buit-in exit().   However, the Apache documentation itself does not mention an exit() function. Neither "perldoc Apache" nor the documentation at http://perl.apache.org

[mp2] Documentation/LogHandler question

Hi - In: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/http.html#PerlLogHandler, the PerlLogHandler documentation, the configuration file sample setup is given as: SetHandler perl-script PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::Registry PerlLogHandler MyApache::LogPerUser Options

Documentation patch for send_http_header()

A patch to Apache.pm docs, to match what is actually going on already: === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/modperl/Apache/Apache.pm,v retrieving revision 1.57 diff -u -r1.57 Apache.pm --- Apache/Apache.pm2000/10/10 16:33:56 1.57 ++

Re: mod_proxy caching documentation

Dan McCormick wrote: > > Hi, > > After struggling with trying to figure out mod_proxy's caching algorithm > and noting from the list archive's that others had, too -- and due to > the dearth of existing documentation on the subject -- I came up with > some documen

Re: mod_proxy caching documentation

On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 01:37:41AM -0500, Dan McCormick wrote: > > I came up with > some documentation below by sifting through the > source code. Excellent, thanks! If a malformed Expires: prevents mod_proxy from caching a response ( > The response will then be > cached

Re: mod_proxy caching documentation

On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote: > I think it would be interesting if you chronicled the capacity > improvements to your site using the mod_proxy server like this. > I don't know how well mod_proxy does this caching from a performance > perspective, and it might be nice to see some num

[Win32] documentation on mod_perl-2

Hi, I've started a document on getting and configuring mod_perl-2 with Apache-2 on Win32 at http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/win32_apache2.html describing both building mod_perl-2 and getting binary packages. Comments, omissions, corrections, etc. are very welcome. Thanks. best regards, randy

Re: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

:) > However, the Apache documentation itself does not mention an exit() > function. Neither "perldoc Apache" nor the documentation at > http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/api/Apache.html contain the word > "exit". Am I looking in the wrong place? Maybe you're asking t

Re: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

Hi Francisco, Sorry it took a long time to reply. Been to Spain. On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Francisco Corella wrote: > I believe calling Apache::exit doesn't prevent the log phase from > being run for the request, does it? That's the way I understand it. > You recommend using 'return' rather than

Re: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

Hi Ged, > Sorry it took a long time to reply. Been to Spain. Thanks for replying. I hope you had a good time in my old country :-) > If you're writing new code then I would recommend writing handlers and > avoiding Apache::Registry altogether. I had been thinking about whether to do this. W

Re: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

Hi Francisco, On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Francisco Corella wrote: > Thanks for replying. I hope you had a good time in my old country :-) You probably saw the reports on the news about roads being washed away by the rain in Sevilla. I went on a motor-cycle. Camping. > > If you're writing new code

RE: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

> > If you're writing new code then I would recommend writing handlers and > > avoiding Apache::Registry altogether. > > I had been thinking about whether to do this. Why do you > recommend avoiding > Apache::Registry? Is there a performance penalty for using it? We sometimes use Apache::Regist

Re: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 08:03:56PM -0700, Kyle Oppenheim wrote: > There are a few performance penalties when using Apache::Registry: > > * Scripts are compiled at first request instead of server start unless you > use something like Apache::RegistryLoader. So, the first request per child > will

RE: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

> > There are a few performance penalties when using Apache::Registry: > > > > * Scripts are compiled at first request instead of server start > unless you > > use something like Apache::RegistryLoader. So, the first > request per child > > will be a little bit slower and you don't get to share m

Re: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

On Wednesday, 2002-09-25 at 10:41:19 -0400, valerian wrote: > BTW, anyone know if Perl 6 will free unused memory? From what I > understand, right now it just allocates as needed, but never gives any > back to the OS when it's done... (ie, when some function ends) Even if Parrot (the perl 6 engi

Re: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

Hi Kyle, > There are a few performance penalties when using Apache::Registry: > > * Scripts are compiled at first request instead of server start unless you > use something like Apache::RegistryLoader. So, the first request per child > will be a little bit slower and you don't get to share memor

Re: Documentation for Apache::exit()?

Hi Ged, > > Thanks for replying. I hope you had a good time in my old country :-) > > You probably saw the reports on the news about roads being washed away > by the rain in Sevilla. I went on a motor-cycle. Camping. Mmm... Doesn't sound like the perfect vacation. I'm glad you made it back :

Re: [mp2] Documentation/LogHandler question

Beau E. Cox wrote: Hi - In: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/http.html#PerlLogHandler, the PerlLogHandler documentation, the configuration file sample setup is given as: SetHandler perl-script PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::Registry PerlLogHandler MyApache

RE: [mp2] Documentation/LogHandler question

> p.s. Geoff, we need a short acronym for your book so it's > easy to refer > to it, (a new eagle), I've called it R&W (Red&White), if you have a > better idea, please suggest. Right, an animal is much easier to remember. Wish it had one on its cover like books from O'reilly. .

Re: [mp2] Documentation/LogHandler question

Hsiao, Chang-Ping wrote: p.s. Geoff, we need a short acronym for your book so it's easy to refer to it, (a new eagle), I've called it R&W (Red&White), if you have a better idea, please suggest. Right, an animal is much easier to remember. Wish it had one on its cover like books from O'rei

Re: [mp2] Documentation/LogHandler question

On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 06:14 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Think of 2.0 as 1.0 on mushrooms. I need to give some thought as to how I can include quote gems like this in my sig. For now, though, I'll leave it to Schwern. David -- David Wheeler AIM: dw

Re: Documentation patch for send_http_header()

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Ken Williams wrote: > A patch to Apache.pm docs, to match what is actually going on already: committed. thanks. :) -- ask bjoern hansen -

RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

This is a proposal for the mod_perl 2.0 documentation project. The project to consist of 3 parts: mod_perl documentation project: --- A. mod_perl user guide B. mod_perl core developer guide C. mod_perl related guides A is obvious. B is a new thing. If people can

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl?

[this probably belong to the list] > I am sending this after a suggestion that was given to me during in a > perlmonks discussion. > > I feel that mod_perl's single threadedness on the Win32 platforms really > warrants some more prominence in the docs. (How about 18pt bold red > warning on pa

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl?

Hi, > > I am sending this after a suggestion that was given to me during in a > > perlmonks discussion. I was the one who suggested it. Why don't you take a shot at writing it? The modperl.pod seems like the logical place to patch. Then Stas could add your information to the guide as well. I

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl?

On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am sending this after a suggestion that was given to me during > > > in a perlmonks discussion. > > I was the one who suggested it. Why don't you take a shot at writing > it? The modperl.pod seems like the logical place to patch. Then S

Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

Greetings.   This documentation patch addresses  the single thread  snafu on Win32.   Comments, corrections and additions (even subtractions) welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the day: where in the doc does this fit?)   Cheers, alf     modperl_multithread_NT.pod Description: Binary data

Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 08:12:25PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > This is a proposal for the mod_perl 2.0 documentation project. > > Sounds good. > > > + each project will have its pumpkin which will make sure that all > > ch

Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

[Barrie, I hope you don't mind that I put it on the list, the more people contribute the better the outcome :)] > Hi Stas, sorry it took so long to get back to this :-/. it's not late al all, really ;0) we have years to come to work on this project. > Some minor feedback. I could see an additi

Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > [Barrie, I hope you don't mind that I put it on the list, the more people > contribute the better the outcome :)] Not at all, I just noticed that others seem to have replied directly and followed suit. > > Something like this: http:

Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > [Barrie, I hope you don't mind that I put it on the list, the more people > > contribute the better the outcome :)] > > Not at all, I just noticed that others seem to have replied direct

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

Greetings. [...] > > This documentation patch addresses the single thread snafu on Win32. > > Comments, corrections and additions (even subtractions) > >welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the day: where in the doc does this fit?) > > Nice, but please repost it inlined. O

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > Greetings. > > [...] > > > This documentation patch addresses the single thread snafu on Win32. > > > Comments, corrections and additions (even subtractions) > > >welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the d

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

Greetings. Randy> That's great that you thought this out and put it together; Randy> a few comments below appear below ... Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions, with the possible exception of what follows. Randy> I got confused about which is the "first" and wh

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > Greetings. > > Randy> That's great that you thought this out and put it together; > Randy> a few comments below appear below ... > > Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions, > with the possible exception of what fol

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

Randy Kobes wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > > >>Greetings. >> >>Randy> That's great that you thought this out and put it together; >>Randy> a few comments below appear below ... >> >>Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions, >>with the p

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > Don't modify the guide, just throw some random and structured winXX > notes into a new doc,and we just add it to the guide as a new chapter. > Then people start sending patches and polish it, like the rest of the > chapters. The new 2.0 docs generation wi

RE: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

Greetings. Stas> so if Alessandro or Randy volunteers (please say so), please Stas> ask winXX Stas> users to send you more winXX specific notes/scenarios and you (the Stas> volunteer) will be the official maintainer of the doc and send me the Stas> new doc and then the future patches. For 2.0 you

RE: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

Hi there, On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > I sure can co-maintain such a document. The "co" part is a good idea for > several reasons - the most cogent being that I am not a native speaker Heck, you write English better than many Englishmen I know... 73, Ged.

[mp2] How do I find Documentation on . . .

From December 2002. I saw no response to this message. Have things stabilized enough yet that there is documentation for these things? * Subject:* [mp2]Kow do I find dovumention on... *Author:* Beau E. Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> *Date:*

Source for Apache::Test documentation on perl.apache.org

Title: Source for Apache::Test documentation on perl.apache.org As I stated in a previous post, I'm coming up to speed on Apache::Test by working from Stas's documentation at http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/testing/testing.html. I remember seeing a few typos on my first pass t

[Fwd: Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32]

Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > Greetings. > > Stas> so if Alessandro or Randy volunteers (please say so), please > Stas> ask winXX > Stas> users to send you more winXX specific notes/scenarios and you (the > Stas> volunteer) will be the official maintainer of the doc and send me the > Stas

Re: [mp2] How do I find Documentation on . . .

Thanks for your reply. I really appreciate your time, so I'll keep it brief. Stas Bekman wrote: Jack Nerad wrote: From December 2002. I saw no response to this message. Have things stabilized enough yet that there is documentation for these things? There is a dynamic tool helpi

Re: [mp2] How do I find Documentation on . . .

Jack Nerad wrote: Thanks for your reply. I really appreciate your time, so I'll keep it brief. Stas Bekman wrote: Jack Nerad wrote: From December 2002. I saw no response to this message. Have things stabilized enough yet that there is documentation for these things? There is a dy

Re: [mp2] How do I find Documentation on . . .

have planned a bulked import of documentation bits from the Apache C header files, but it's incomplete. Seeing that it's not getting anywhere and hearing no news from Gerald Richter, I think I'll just go ahead and import whatever we have. And then everybody can chime in and

Re: [mp2] How do I find Documentation on . . .

Jack Nerad wrote: From December 2002. I saw no response to this message. Have things stabilized enough yet that there is documentation for these things? There is a dynamic tool helping to figure out what's available: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/ModPerl/MethodLookup.html The

Re: Source for Apache::Test documentation on perl.apache.org

Garrett Goebel wrote: As I stated in a previous post, I'm coming up to speed on Apache::Test by working from Stas's documentation at http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/testing/testing.html. I remember seeing a few typos on my first pass through the documentation. Now that I'

Fastcgi on win [Was: Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl?]

Greetings. [following Stas' suggestion I have subscribed to the list and posted the patch there, so I am crossposting]   >Do you know if FastCGI is multi-threaded or multi-process on Windows? Multi process. Each process speaks to mod_fastcgi over a named pipe. As you mention,  this (being mul

Re: knowledge base - was Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to "let's use mod_perl > > > to buils a knowledge base" both to demonstrate it's power and to serve > > > the community. > > > > I like the idea!

Re: knowledge base - was Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:45:43AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to "let's use mod_perl > > > > to buils a knowledge base" both to demonstrat

Re: knowledge base - was Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:45:43AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to "let's use mod_perl > > >

Re: knowledge base - was Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 07:31:11PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > This all sounds cool. I have a few concerns with this proposal: > > - source documents living under modperl cvs are to be written in POD. > The project that you suggest should be able to accept this and other > formats as a source

Re: knowledge base - was Re: RFC: mod_perl 2.0 documentation project

On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 07:31:11PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > This all sounds cool. I have a few concerns with this proposal: > > > > - source documents living under modperl cvs are to be written in POD. > > The project that you suggest should be able t

ANNOUNCE: modperl docs 2.0 documentation project mailing list andcvs rep.

ested in helping us creating great documentation by reviewing what gets committed and submitting new docs and patches, please subscribe to these two mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then you can post to the docs list, take [EMAIL PROTECTED] address and remove the -subscribe part fr

Re: Fastcgi on win [Was: Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl?]

> So mod_perl has a slight speed edge over fastcgi (which is overthrottled a > little with four servers). Really? Maybe this is because multi-process handling isn't as fast on NT. Does it change much if you vary the number of servers? My goal is to give some kind of useful suggestion to people

Re: Fastcgi on win [Was: Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl?]

Greetings. >> So mod_perl has a slight speed edge over fastcgi (which is overthrottled a >> little with four servers). >Really? Maybe this is because multi-process handling isn't as fast on NT. >Does it change much if you vary the number of servers? Well, I am getting a little wary of the numbe