John Chiu wrote:
Thanks in advance. I've tried all the archives and google'd but I have
not found anything that would help.
I'm running RH 8.0, httpd-2.0.40-11.5 and mod_perl-1.99_05-3 from the
RedHat distribution. I'm trying to create a small proxy module that will
check a non-proxy
So Ive decided to dive headlong into 2.0. So far I like
it but find the documentation lacking and there seems to be a lot missing. I
tried Apache::Cookie with it, no dice. It gave an
error to the effect that it didnt know what bootstrap was
(I think that was it). Apache::Cookie made
So I've decided to dive headlong into 2.0. So far I like it but find the
documentation lacking and there seems to be a lot missing. I tried
Apache::Cookie with it, no dice. It gave an error to the effect that it
didn't know what bootstrap was (I think that was it). Apache::Cookie
made
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Jamie Krasnoo wrote:
So I've decided to dive headlong into 2.0. So far I like it but
find the documentation lacking and there seems to be a lot
missing. I tried Apache::Cookie with it, no dice. It gave an
error to the effect that it didn't know what bootstrap was (I
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Ross Matt-QMR000 wrote:
I would really like to be removed from this list but the
un-scribe does not work for me. the problem is the mail address
that I used way back when has been aliases to different
address.
Try sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for some
On Thu, 29 May 2003, FARRINGTON, RYAN wrote:
-- I don;t know if the first message was sent but here it is
again -- just as a test I used the ALL in ONE package to get
this installed and it works like a champ except for
Apache::compat errors with something about line 68. =( I don't
have the
Title: MOD_PERL 2.0?
just as a test I used the ALL in ONE package to get this installed and it works like a champ except for Apache::compat errors with something about line 68. =( I don't have the error infront of me but it is something like method not defined.
for those who haven't already seen it, perl.com ran the second of my series
of articles on mod_perl 2.0 late last week. the title is actually a bit
decieving. it's about using the Apache-Test testing framework, but although
Apache-Test is shown in a mod_perl 2.0 context, Apache-Test can
Hi!
I've a script that looks like this:
if ($runnung_on_mod_perl) {
Apache-request-register_cleanup(\init_globals);
}
Under mod_perl 1.0 works fine with Apache::Registry.
Can someone give me an Example how to make a register_cleanup with mod_perl
2?
Thanks a lot
Denis
Denis Banovic wrote:
Hi!
I've a script that looks like this:
if ($runnung_on_mod_perl) {
Apache-request-register_cleanup(\init_globals);
}
Under mod_perl 1.0 works fine with Apache::Registry.
Can someone give me an Example how to make a register_cleanup with mod_perl
2?
A copy-n-paste
Stas Bekman wrote:
Denis Banovic wrote:
Hi!
I've a script that looks like this:
if ($runnung_on_mod_perl) {
Apache-request-register_cleanup(\init_globals);
}
Under mod_perl 1.0 works fine with Apache::Registry.
Can someone give me an Example how to make a register_cleanup with
mod_perl
2?
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r-connection object not having auth_type or user defined. The
$r-auth_type work just fine. Are these the same reference? What
should I look for, or use?
[snip]
Stas Bekman wrote:
Brian Millett wrote:
Hi,
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r-connection object not having auth_type or user defined. The
$r-auth_type work just fine. Are these the same
Hi,
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r-connection object not having auth_type or user defined. The
$r-auth_type work just fine. Are these the same reference? What
should I look for, or use?
Brian Millett wrote:
Hi,
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r-connection object not having auth_type or user defined. The
$r-auth_type work just fine. Are these the same reference? What
should I
directives, prevent the
server from starting?
That works ok, for Perl 5.6.1 and 5.8.0. Surely I can't execute any perl
then. The browser starts to load a page, but does not finish. After several
minutes(!) it says 404.
If so, then it might be that you're running
into the fact that mod_perl 2.0
be that you're running
into the fact that mod_perl 2.0 on Win32 has problems with
perl-5.6.1 (ActivePerl 6xx), and that the solution would be to
migrate to perl-5.8.0 (ActivePerl 8xx).
As long as I don't have a DBD-Mysql afterwards, that's not
possible other than for testing. But it's
Hi all,
if you would be willing to spend a minute on helping me out of this: I'm
trying to get mod_perl-2 running on Win32. Without success, of course. :(
My box is a Win2k SP3 with 1GB RAM, ActivePerl 5.6.1 build 633, mod_perl-2
1.99_09-dev on Apache 2.0.43. Everything is freshly loaded and
any further mod_perl directives, prevent the
server from starting? If so, then it might be that you're running
into the fact that mod_perl 2.0 on Win32 has problems with
perl-5.6.1 (ActivePerl 6xx), and that the solution would be to
migrate to perl-5.8.0 (ActivePerl 8xx).
However, if the server
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:27:38AM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
Cool. Now can you please send the shortest possible example that you still
get the SEGFAULT with, so I can reproduce it and fix? Thanks.
I finally got a working apache2+mod_perl working in my $HOME dir (I
could not find the core
Jérôme Augé wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:27:38AM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
Cool. Now can you please send the shortest possible example that you still
get the SEGFAULT with, so I can reproduce it and fix? Thanks.
I finally got a working apache2+mod_perl working in my $HOME dir (I
could
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:09:37AM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've applied a fix that hopefully cures this thing in cvs. Please try
again with the latest cvs version.
http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html#2_0_Development_Source_Distribution
I installed the CVS version (1.9909) and I
I grep'ed into the mod_perl sources and found in
examples/lib/Apache/HelloWorld.pm that send_http_header does not exists
in mod_perl 2.0 and print is not yet implemented. Is this right ? so
this could easily explain my problems :)
in examples/lib/Apache/HelloWorld.pm :
[...]
sub handler {
my
Jérôme Augé wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:09:37AM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've applied a fix that hopefully cures this thing in cvs. Please try
again with the latest cvs version.
http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html#2_0_Development_Source_Distribution
Since you've never sent the
Jérôme Augé wrote:
I grep'ed into the mod_perl sources and found in
examples/lib/Apache/HelloWorld.pm that send_http_header does not exists
in mod_perl 2.0 and print is not yet implemented. Is this right ? so
this could easily explain my problems :)
It's an old example, I've removed
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:32:29PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
Location /plop/
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHeaderParserHandler Apache::Plop
/Location
Well, this is not really what I want to do ...
I would like to catch all the proxy request and apply modifications to
the requested
Jérôme Augé wrote:
Hi,
I'm beginning with mod_perl (mod_perl-1.99_05 + Apache 2.0.40 from
RedHat 8.0) and I want to write a module for rewriting the documents
that passes through the Apache proxy. So, I looked at the
Apache::AdBlocker
Stas Bekman wrote:
Jérôme Augé wrote:
[...]
After making your example work, I don't see any segfaults. Please try
again with modperl-1.99_08 which was released a few days ago.
[...]
1. You can't push_handlers when you are inside a response handler.
Use PerlHeaderParserHandler instead
I've
Dale Lancaster wrote:
Thanks for the information. I did try removing Apache:DBI, but it still
fails.
OK
Building everything from source will be time consuming. If I do
that, I will probably just drop back to Apache 1.3 since I know it works.
It's not time consuming at all, just follow
]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RedHat 8.0 standard Apache2.0 and mod_perl 2.0::PerlRun
doesn't work?
Dale Lancaster wrote:
I have searched the archives and various websites to find my problem and
its associated resolution to no avail.
I upgraded my working Apache 1.3 and mod_perl 1.x
I have
searched the archives and various websites to find my problem and its associated
resolution to no avail.
I
upgraded my working Apache 1.3 and mod_perl 1.x website using the PerlRun option
of modperl to the RedHat 8.0 standard release with Apache/mod_perl 2.0 combo --
bad move
Dale Lancaster wrote:
I have searched the archives and various websites to find my problem and
its associated resolution to no avail.
I upgraded my working Apache 1.3 and mod_perl 1.x website using the
PerlRun option of modperl to the RedHat 8.0 standard release with
Apache/mod_perl 2.0
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
On 17 Dec 2002, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
[...]
I'm in a difficult position because the project will be completed in a
couple of months. If the consensus is that mod_perl 2.0 will be
released by that point, then everything will be fine (I'll develop using
the beta code
I am starting a new project that makes use of functionality required in
Apache 2. Naturally, I would like to use mod_perl, but mod_perl 2.0 is
still in beta.
Can anyone offer any information about when they feel mod_perl will be
stable enough for use in a production environment? I intend to use
On Dec 17 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
Can anyone offer any information about when they feel mod_perl will be
stable enough for use in a production environment?
Sometime next year.
See:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/krekrouslor/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, back to lurking.
On 17 Dec 2002, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
[...]
I'm in a difficult position because the project will be completed in a
couple of months. If the consensus is that mod_perl 2.0 will be
released by that point, then everything will be fine (I'll develop using
the beta code). If it is still
So, I have updated my src of apache, arp and mod_perl2 from cvs. Still the exact same result.
I've messed up while adjusting for the new libapr's naming. it's fixed now in
cvs. Though you shouldn't have had a problem in first place. it'd have just
skipped linking to the apr libs and shouldn't
Hello,
Stas, I didn't take offense at your first reply.
Steven, I'm sorry if my post was in any way insulting or otherwise offensive.
Stas, I do understand - more with every piece of code I add to my box - that the xnix
world and esp. the open source core of that world is a constantly shifting
months
studying and building and resolving myriad confilcts and dependancies on
this server:
Red Hat v8.0
Apache v2.0.43
perl v5.8.0
gcc v 3.2 (2002 09 03)
mod_perl 2.0 (nee 1.99_07)
apr 0.9.1
apr-util 0.9.1
(I must confess that if I hadn't seen the rock-solid stability of xnix OS's
I'd have given up
D. Fairbanks wrote:
[...]
LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/lib gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib APR.o -o
../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so -L/usr/local/apache2/2.0.43/lib
-lapr -laprutil
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: ***
Is there a reason that we have to be this insulting?
Beckman, I really expected more out of you.
LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/lib gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib APR.o -o
../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so
-L/usr/local/apache2/2.0.43/lib -lapr -laprutil
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr
Your attention please:
[***]
[*** ***]
[*** please send the followups back to the list! ***]
[*** ***]
[***]
Hi
I am new to linux and mod_perl. Weare
runningperl 5.8.0 and apache 2.0.43 on linux.First time we are
tryingtoinstall mod_perl2.But the "make test"failed
completed. Here is the error_log reads:
END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=19385[Thu Nov 21
11:24:45 2002] [notice] Apache/2.0.43 (Unix)
please remember to properly report problems, as explained at:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/help/help.html#Reporting_Problems
(hint: the shortcuts menu on the left side of any page of perl.apache.org)
if you don't provide all the required details it makes it hard to guess
what
If you come to ApacheCon and plan to go to the mod_perl 2.0 presentation
on Wed, after the lunch, here are the handouts if you want to print
them. The conference organizers won't give printed versions, in order to
cut costs. So here it's:
http://stason.org/talks/apachecon2002/presentation
hi all...
I had a few moments so I've started to port Apache::Clean over to
mod_perl 2.0. it's far from complete, and I haven't examined all the
issues with proper caching headers yet, but you can find the work in
progress here:
http://www.modperlcookbook.org/~geoff/modules/experimental
Hi,
I am running Solaris 8 and have installed Apache 2:
bash-2.03# /usr/apache/bin/httpd -v
Server version: Apache/2.0.39
Server built: Aug 20 2002 11:26:54
I also have installed perl 5.8.0:
bash-2.03# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.0 built for sun4-solaris
I am trying to install mod_perl 2
Tom Hibbert wrote:
Hi,
I am running Solaris 8 and have installed Apache 2:
bash-2.03# /usr/apache/bin/httpd -v
Server version: Apache/2.0.39
Server built: Aug 20 2002 11:26:54
I also have installed perl 5.8.0:
bash-2.03# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.0 built for sun4-solaris
I
important production system, and rebuilding the tools fixed the
problem.
In anticipation of the postmortem meeting, I'm trying to find out if this
problem still exists in mod_perl 2.0. Websearches have been fruitless; any
pe[a]rls of wisdom from the list?
Charlton
important production system, and rebuilding the tools fixed the
problem.
In anticipation of the postmortem meeting, I'm trying to find out if this
problem still exists in mod_perl 2.0. Websearches have been fruitless; any
pe[a]rls of wisdom from the list?
Charlton
Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
Hello,
I have look around the documentation of mod_perl 2.0 and I'm looking if
it's possible with the current mod_perl API to add a method (like GET,
HEAD) in apache to extend the functionnaly of the HTTP server ?
There is also some possibility with the new
on the win32 platform
- mod_perl to allow for persistent (stay connected on the server side)
Net::Telnet objects (CGI is unacceptable since a new process is spawned at
each request leaving no room for persistent objects)
- Multiple perl interpreters of Apache2 / mod_perl 2.0 to serve more than
one
for mod_perl 2.0?
I understand that Apache::Request is replaced with Apache::RequestRec and
Apache::RequestIO and Apache::Request does not compile with a complaint of
Can't locate object method boot via package mod_perl::boot at
C:/Perl/site/lib/Apache/Table.pm line 6. I seem to be running
: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0
errors:
using Apache/2.0.36 (prefork MPM)
because you must use 2.0.39.
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl
Zac Morris wrote:
Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that
installed 2.0.40-dev
and I'm still getting errors during make test of mod_perl 2. Does it have
to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile?
Yes, to compile 1.99_04
Sorry if I'm just not getting it...
]
To: Zac Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: mod_perl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0
Zac Morris wrote:
Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like
that
installed 2.0.40-dev
and I'm still
Zac Morris wrote:
Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you
that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you
say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+
I've updated the README file, which now states what you need.
All the
Zac Morris wrote:
Ok, still getting the same errors during make test.
One of the first lines of the perl Makefile.PL --blahblah shows:
Configuring Apache/2.0.39 mod_perl/1.99_04 Perl/v5.8.0
Does this mean that the make install I did on the Perl/v5.8.0_RC2 didn't
take?
may be you
]
To: Zac Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0
Zac Morris wrote:
Ahhh, ok more clarity. :)
Forgive me if I'm just not doing my detective work in poking around for
documentation, but is there a doc
, then rebuild my
mod_perl 2 (against my installed Apache 2 source).
Sorry Zac, my diagnosis and patch were wrong. mod_perl 2.0's compat
layer doesn't require mod_perl 1.0 to be installed, sorry for confusing
people.
Apache::Module *is* in 2.0. But for some reason it didn't work for you.
So
Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions:
use Apache2();
use Apache::compat;
and I'm still getting the errors:
Undefined subroutine Apache::Module::loaded called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/Apache/compat.pm line 95.
Compilation failed in require at ./db_connect_test.pm
Zac Morris wrote:
Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions:
use Apache2();
use Apache::compat;
and I'm still getting the errors:
Undefined subroutine Apache::Module::loaded called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/Apache/compat.pm line 95.
Compilation failed in
11:02 AM
Subject: Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0
Zac Morris wrote:
Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions:
use Apache2();
use Apache::compat;
and I'm still getting the errors:
Undefined subroutine Apache::Module::loaded called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386
Zac Morris wrote:
Ahhh, ok more clarity. :)
Forgive me if I'm just not doing my detective work in poking around for
documentation, but is there a doc that contains all the kludges or
assumed modules I need to already have in place?
All the docs that we have now are at
At 00:49 23.06.2002, Charles Aulds wrote:
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
Apache::DBI can only work
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested
with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
2) You will probably need to run
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will
need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas
said,
Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
2) You will probably need to run
someplace just give me a
quick pointer.
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
2) You will probably need to run mod_perl 2.0 in compat mode: put
. I'm learning quick so if this is covered someplace just give
me a
quick pointer.
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
2) You will probably
but first you need:
PerlModule Apache2
or 'use Apache2' in startup.pl. see:
http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html#Accessing_the_mod_perl_2_0_Modules
Nope, he did a clean mod_perl 2 install, without MP_INST_APACHE2 I
think... so doesn't have an Apache.pm
I'm running
Apache2. I'm learning quick so if this is covered someplace just give me a
quick pointer.
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
2) You
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Douglas Younger wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone written a proxy handler in 2.0 similar to example 7-12 of the
O`Reilly book? I've tried converting it without much luck. I don't need the
add-blocker stuff, just a generic proxy handle that I can add some
additional lines
Hello,
Has anyone written a proxy handler in 2.0 similar to example 7-12 of the
O`Reilly book? I've tried converting it without much luck. I don't need the
add-blocker stuff, just a generic proxy handle that I can add some
additional lines to parse the output.
I've had some problems with
be retrieved
from server A only with an alias not proxied to server B
pascal
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Younger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:26 PM
Subject: How do I determine end of request? (mod_perl 2.0)
Hello,
I'm
Hello,
I'm fairly new to using mod_perl. I've been able to find lots of
resources dealing with mod_perl 1.x, but the documentation for 2.0 is
rather sparse.
I'm pretty sure what I need to do can only be handled by Apache 2.0 thus
I'm forced to use mod_perl 2.0... (well 1.99)
I'm trying
- Original Message -
From: pascal barbedor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Douglas Younger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: How do I determine end of request? (mod_perl 2.0)
hi
you could maybe set the ProxyIOBufferSize
or Proxyreceivebuffersize
It looks like Apache 2.0(.35) is 'gold', so when can we expect a 'gold'
version of mod_perl 2.0 so we can actually make apache 2 fun? ;p
Jon Coulter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]; Mod perl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: Status of mod_perl 2.0
Jeff Stuart wrote:
Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working
with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all?
Tell me what's the status of apache 2.0 and I'll
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 13:00, Stas Bekman wrote:
Jeff Stuart wrote:
Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working
with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all?
Tell me what's the status of apache 2.0 and I'll tell you the status of
mod_perl 2.0 :)
But seriously mod_perl
Message -
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mod Perl Devel List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mod perl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: Status of mod_perl 2.0
Jeff Stuart wrote:
Question? What
Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working
with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all?
Jeff Stuart wrote:
Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working
with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all?
Tell me what's the status of apache 2.0 and I'll tell you the status of
mod_perl 2.0 :)
But seriously mod_perl 2.0 will be ready about the time apache 2.0 (i.e.
httpd
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:45:43AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to let's use mod_perl
to buils a
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 07:31:11PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
This all sounds cool. I have a few concerns with this proposal:
- source documents living under modperl cvs are to be written in POD.
The project that you suggest should be able to accept this and other
formats as a source.
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 07:31:11PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
This all sounds cool. I have a few concerns with this proposal:
- source documents living under modperl cvs are to be written in POD.
The project that you suggest should be able to accept
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:45:43AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to let's use mod_perl
to buils a knowledge base both to demonstrate it's power
[Barrie, I hope you don't mind that I put it on the list, the more people
contribute the better the outcome :)]
Hi Stas, sorry it took so long to get back to this :-/.
it's not late al all, really ;0) we have years to come to work on this
project.
Some minor feedback. I could see an
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to let's use mod_perl
to buils a knowledge base both to demonstrate it's power and to serve
the community.
I like the idea!!!
If we can
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
[Barrie, I hope you don't mind that I put it on the list, the more people
contribute the better the outcome :)]
Not at all, I just noticed that others seem to have replied directly and
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 08:12:25PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
This is a proposal for the mod_perl 2.0 documentation project.
Sounds good.
+ each project will have its pumpkin which will make sure that all
chapters of the project adher to the same
This is a proposal for the mod_perl 2.0 documentation project.
The project to consist of 3 parts:
mod_perl documentation project:
---
A. mod_perl user guide
B. mod_perl core developer guide
C. mod_perl related guides
A is obvious.
B is a new thing. If people can
Hi all,
We currently use (close to) the latest Apache / mod_perl environment on
HP/UX. Our holding company is forcing a move to Win2k :/, but they still
want to use our mod_perl apps :).
I was looking for more information on mod_perl 2.0 today but didn't come up
w/much. I have several questions
for more information on mod_perl 2.0 today but didn't come up
w/much. I have several questions. If you can answer or point to docs, I
would be most appreciative.
1) Is moving to mod_perl 2.0 going to require large code changes (even on a
*nix system)?
1a) Are there any web sites detailing
him talking for almost all 5 days non-stop :) A good
choice :)
So to conclude this email, I want to thank Nat for giving us the mod_perl
track at the upcoming TPC, and hope that they will keep it in the future.
BTW, in Nat's story he incorrectly links to Doug's home page as a source
for mod_perl
94 matches
Mail list logo
