Derek Jennings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2005 20:33, Phlod wrote:
> > Hello everyone. This is my first posting to this list, and I'm quite
> > pleased that this list exsists at all. Thanks for taking the time to
> > read this.
> >
> > After searching through the list archi
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Thursday 03 March 2005 20:33, Phlod wrote:
Hello everyone. This is my first posting to this list, and I'm quite
pleased that this list exsists at all. Thanks for taking the time to
read this.
After searching through the list archive, I couldn't find an answer to
my que
On Thursday 03 March 2005 20:33, Phlod wrote:
> Hello everyone. This is my first posting to this list, and I'm quite
> pleased that this list exsists at all. Thanks for taking the time to
> read this.
>
> After searching through the list archive, I couldn't find an answer to
> my question, so I t
On Thursday 03 March 2005 02:33 pm, Phlod wrote:
> Hello everyone. This is my first posting to this list, and I'm quite
> pleased that this list exsists at all. Thanks for taking the time to
> read this.
>
> After searching through the list archive, I couldn't find an answer to
> my question, so
Hello everyone. This is my first posting to this list, and I'm quite
pleased that this list exsists at all. Thanks for taking the time to
read this.
After searching through the list archive, I couldn't find an answer to
my question, so I thought I'd ask here. Please excuse me if this has
be
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 23:23:32 +0100
Nigel Wilkinson disseminated the following:
> >> They've put you back on the meds, haven't they?
> >
> > You betcha, massive doses of Thorazine.
> >
> Is spam that targeted now, I only get spam for viagra, perhaps I should
> make an appointment with my doctor.
--On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 20:05:51 -0400 JoeHill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:50:14 -0400
Charles A Edwards disseminated the following:
They've put you back on the meds, haven't they?
You betcha, massive doses of Thorazine.
Is spam that targeted now, I only get spam for
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:50:14 -0400
Charles A Edwards disseminated the following:
> They've put you back on the meds, haven't they?
You betcha, massive doses of Thorazine.
--
JoeHill RLU #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
20:05:06 up 27 days, 19:49, 6 users, load average: 1.50, 1.52, 1.19
++
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:13:54 -0400
JoeHill wrote:
> Thank you, come again!
They've put you back on the meds, haven't they?
Charles
--
The second best policy is dishonesty.
-
Mandrake Linux 10.1 on PurpleDragon
2.6.8.1-4mdkenterprise
http://www.eslrahc.com
---
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:02:02 -0600
Wally Brown disseminated the following:
> Does anyone know how I can upgrade my site to version 4.5.1 from 4.5 without
> having to redo all my pages?
Ok, you gotta be kiddin' me. Not only *HTML* but a *cutesy coloured
background*??!!
What's next, freakin' anim
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 17:02, Wally Brown wrote:
> version 4.5.1 from 4.5
of what program?
please don't send html-mail to this list
(you wannna see what it looks like???)
--
linux counter #167806
Want to buy your Pack or Services from Mand
Does anyone know how I can upgrade my site to
version 4.5.1 from 4.5 without having to redo all my pages?
<>
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandra
On Saturday 07 August 2004 10:11 pm, Carl J. Bauman wrote:
> >
> > That seemed to work for me. I changed sources and then ran "urpmi
> > --auto-select --auto". This results in a pretty sizeable download,
> > so you might want to reconsider this approach if you're not on some
> > sort of broadband
I want to upgrade one of my computers from 10 CE to 10 Official. Should
I just change the sources at easy urpmi to do this or is there somthing
else i should do ?
TIA
Regards,
Dan Gordon
--
Wed Aug 4 22:38:42 EDT 2004
22:38:42 up 1 day, 2:14, 0 users, load average: 0.01, 0.29, 0.20
I have
I upgraded KDE on my Mandrake 10 system from
ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.2.3/Mandrake/RPMS
Now Kmail does not work. None of the buttons are clickable.
The "Pager" won't display apps. The system tray won't come up.
What a pain! Anyone else experience this?
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 19 March 2004 09:10 pm, John Drouhard wrote:
> I have another question about upgrading to 10.0 so I thought I'd start a
> new thread. I have a local mirror of cooker. I would like to install it
> so I could have 10 + all bugfixes so far. Howe
I have another question about upgrading to 10.0 so I thought I'd start a
new thread. I have a local mirror of cooker. I would like to install it
so I could have 10 + all bugfixes so far. However, I finally have my
system set up perfectly, without any problems that I can see. I run my
own 2.6 kernel
On Sunday 15 February 2004 05:16 pm, robin wrote:
> Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Margot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 07:05
> > Subject: Re: [newbie]
Hoyt Bailey wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Margot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 07:05
Subject: Re: [newbie] Upgrading to mdk 10
aronsmith wrote:
Just upgraded to mdk 10 any one know how to get KDE back?
or Gnome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday 15 February 2004 8:16 am, aronsmith wrote:
> >
> > Apparently the KDE packages have been "rearranged" - I suggest you try
> > rpmdrake via mcc, search for anything with kde in the name - I think you
> > need kdebase, plus (probably lots of!) de
- Original Message -
From: "Margot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 07:05
Subject: Re: [newbie] Upgrading to mdk 10
> aronsmith wrote:
> > Just upgraded to mdk 10 any one know how to get KDE back?
> > or
aronsmith wrote:
Just upgraded to mdk 10 any one know how to get KDE back?
or Gnome even IceWm is all that comes up.
K mail crashes. whatv packages do I need?
TIA
smitty (who is more confused than ever)
Apparently the KDE packages have been "rearranged" - I suggest you try
rpmdrake via mcc, searc
Just upgraded to mdk 10 any one know how to get KDE back?
or Gnome even IceWm is all that comes up.
K mail crashes. whatv packages do I need?
TIA
smitty (who is more confused than ever)
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Ok, here comes probably a really dumb question. I'm running MDK 9.0 with SA
2.41. I'd like to upgrade to at least SA 2.55 however I also don't want to
fsck up my system. SA 2.55 says it requires the following:
* rpm-helper
* perl-Mail-SpamAssassin
* /bin/sh
* /bin/sh
* bas
>-Original Message-
>From: Derek Jennings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:43 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] Upgrading, backing up, and
restoring
>data - moving from 9.1 to 9.2
>
>On Wednesday 07 Jan 2004 4:13 pm,
On Wednesday 07 Jan 2004 4:13 pm, Tango Echo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently decided to take the plunge and use 9.2
> as my base OS. I'm performing a clean install on a
> brand new hard drive. My old mdk 9.1 install still
> resides on two old hard disks. My question is this:
>
> Is there a si
Hi all,
I've recently decided to take the plunge and use 9.2
as my base OS. I'm performing a clean install on a
brand new hard drive. My old mdk 9.1 install still
resides on two old hard disks. My question is this:
Is there a simple way to restore my data from 9.1?
The main apps that need to
If your trying to have the NVIDIA drivers work in both 2.4 and 2.6 on the same
machine it's easy enoughyou just need to use the same version of the kernel
driver. eg 5328.
you simply install the 2.4 one which updates glx to 5328 version.
Then extract the source for the header for the kernel drive
On Friday 19 Dec 2003 4:44 am, JoeHill wrote:
> Can you not have two sets of drivers installed, kernel
> *and* GLX, as long as they are installed into seperate
> kernels?
>
> Seems to me, as I indicated below, he should be able to
> install both kernel and GLX drivers and have 3D
> acceleration in
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:55:21 +0800
Anguo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I do startx before startkde?
actually, you can just type "kde".
--
JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++
The United States Drug Enforcement
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 12:55:21PM +0800, Anguo wrote:
> yes, that's it.
>
> Once I have booted in console mode, how do I start KDE
> again?
> I see the following two commands:
> startkde
> startx
> Should I do startx before startkde?
If you haven't messed with your ~/.xsession (and
On Friday 19 Dec 2003 4:30 am, JoeHill wrote:
> Eventually, what you might want to do, once the new
> kernel has proven itself stable and solid, is *uninstall*
> the 4321 drivers and install the 4496 GLX binary.
ok, I will try this.
thanks Joe,
Augustin
--
Linux. The Future is Open.
"Linux
On Friday 19 Dec 2003 2:42 am, robin wrote:
> > When I do so, Linux starts in text mode but Mandrake
> > always end up by starting X anyway without me doing
> > anything. ???
>
> Look in the Mandrake Control Center -> Hardware ->
> XFdrake -> Options. You probably have it set to start X
> automati
On Friday 19 Dec 2003 2:18 am, Pablo Vitoria wrote:
> Can you send the output of:
> rpm -qil NVIDIA_GLX-4321-3mdk
> rpm -qil NVIDIA_kernel-2.4.22.21mdk-4496-2.2.92mdk
> rpm -qil NVIDIA_kernel-2.4.21.0.13mdk-4321-3mdk
Hello Pablo and everybody,
Thanks to all who responded in this thread (Pablo, Jo
JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:19:27 +
John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I'm astounded that you can get any nividia driver to work with
"nvidia" instead of "nv"
Strange, I must be lucky, I've never had one bit of trouble with the Nvidia
drivers, other than never
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:19:27 +
John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm astounded that you can get any nividia driver to work with
> "nvidia" instead of "nv"
Strange, I must be lucky, I've never had one bit of trouble with the Nvidia
drivers, other than never being able to get
H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Thursday 18 December 2003 17:38, John Richard Smith wrote:
I didn't know that HarM,
So how do you get the hardware acceleration going then,
because if just "nvidia" nothing works ?
John
There's only one prerequisite:
The binary nvidia-drivers for the kernel and the N
robin wrote:
Anguo wrote:
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 6:22 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Pound to a penny you forgot to modify your
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4
Section "Device"
Identifier "device1"
VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
BoardName "NVIDIA GeForce3 (generic)"
Driver "nv"
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:11:28 +0100
"H.J.Bathoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you have the choice of googling around, asking questions here, maybe
> downloading more stuff from nvidia going over it all again, getting your 3D
> going and learning a lot..or:
> You leave it as it is, happy wit
Title: RE: XF86Config-4 and nvidia drivers Re: [newbie] upgrading nvidia kernel in a safe way...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of H.J.Bathoorn
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XF86Config-4
H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Thursday 18 December 2003 16:31, John Richard Smith wrote:
Here is the relevant section in mine:
Section "Device"
Identifier "device1"
VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
BoardName "NVIDIA GeForce2 DDR (generic)"
Driver "nvidia"
Option "DPMS"
EndSection
you mean I
On Friday 19 Dec 2003 1:05 am, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> On Thursday 18 December 2003 16:31, John Richard Smith
wrote:
> > >Here is the relevant section in mine:
> > >
> > >Section "Device"
> > >Identifier "device1"
> > >VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
> > >BoardName "NVIDIA GeForce2 DDR (
On Thursday 18 December 2003 16:31, John Richard Smith wrote:
> >Here is the relevant section in mine:
> >
> >Section "Device"
> >Identifier "device1"
> >VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
> >BoardName "NVIDIA GeForce2 DDR (generic)"
> >Driver "nvidia"
> >Option "DPMS"
> >EndSectio
Anguo wrote:
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 6:22 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
Pound to a penny you forgot to modify your
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4
Section "Device"
Identifier "device1"
VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
BoardName "NVIDIA GeForce3 (generic)"
Driver "nv" --- chan
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 6:22 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
> Pound to a penny you forgot to modify your
> /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "device1"
> VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
> BoardName "NVIDIA GeForce3 (generic)"
> Driver "nv" --- c
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 5:29 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> Yep. You shouldn't be in X when installing the Nvidia
> drivers anyway. The reason, of course, that X won't start
> with the new kenel, is that in your XF86Config-4 you have
> it set to load the Nvidia driver. As long as the old
> kernel is still lo
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 5:28 pm, jason pearl wrote:
> > you mean that I should boot with new_kernel, and from
> > the console do urpmi new_nvidia_driver. I should NOT do
> > it from current_kernel.
> hwo did u get that kernel? cuz i want it... urpmi
> kernel-nvidia?
Hello Jason,
I was referring
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 6:51 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> If you boot directly to graphic mode:
> init 3
When I do so, Linux starts in text mode but Mandrake always
end up by starting X anyway without me doing anything.
???
Anguo
--
Quote of the day:
"MS bet the firm on .NET
Sun bet
Anguo wrote:
Hello,
From searching the archives of this list and doing a lot of reading, I
know that kernel images are installed side by side. So now I
have:vmlinuz-2.4.22-21mdkvmlinuz-2.4.21-0.13mdkMy question concern the
nvidia driver. I have downloaded from the club:
NVIDIA_kernel-2.4.22
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 05:40, jason pearl wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 02:29, JoeHill wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:17:26 +0800
> > Anguo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > you mean that I should boot with new_kernel, and from the
> > > console do urpmi new_nvidia_driver. I should NOT do i
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 02:29, JoeHill wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:17:26 +0800
> Anguo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > you mean that I should boot with new_kernel, and from the
> > console do urpmi new_nvidia_driver. I should NOT do it from
> > current_kernel.
>
> Just to be on the safe sid
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:17:26 +0800
Anguo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you mean that I should boot with new_kernel, and from the
> console do urpmi new_nvidia_driver. I should NOT do it from
> current_kernel.
Just to be on the safe side. I would bet dollars to doughnuts that the Nvidia
RPM "kno
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 02:17, Anguo wrote:
> On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 4:55 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> > > but I am hesitating to urpmi it, because I don't
> > > understand how it would affect my current setup.
> > > If after installing the nvidia driver, there are any
> > > problem, I need to be able to bo
On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 4:55 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> > but I am hesitating to urpmi it, because I don't
> > understand how it would affect my current setup.
> > If after installing the nvidia driver, there are any
> > problem, I need to be able to boot with the old kernel
> > (the one I am using now).
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:39:22 +0800
Anguo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question concern the nvidia driver. I have downloaded
> from the club:
> NVIDIA_kernel-2.4.22.21mdk-4496-2.2.92mdk.i586.rpm
>
> but I am hesitating to urpmi it, because I don't understand
> how it would affect my c
Hello,
At last, I've come around to upgrading my kernel, after
upgrading all the other applications to 9.2 when it came
out. I got a fright when mandrake wouldn't boot (actually,
it did but X didn't start, which comes to the same for me).
My lilo.conf was a bit mixed up, but I managed to boot
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:13:50 +0700
Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Can I upgrade glibc using rpm Uvh?
> Or what is the proper way?
IIRC, glibc is *it*. Your whole system is built based on that version of
glibc, so changing it would break your system, not just a few packages,
but the
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 09:13 pm, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear all,
> When I tried to install esmtp4.1.1, it asked for a newer glibc.
> Mine is glibc-devel-2.2.5-16mdk and glibc-2.2.5-16mdk on mdk9.0
> It asked for glibc-2.3.1-10mdk.i586.rpm
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
When I tried to install esmtp4.1.1, it asked for a newer glibc.
Mine is glibc-devel-2.2.5-16mdk and glibc-2.2.5-16mdk on mdk9.0
It asked for glibc-2.3.1-10mdk.i586.rpm
Can I upgrade glibc using rpm Uvh?
Or what is the proper way?
Thanks.
-
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 10:45 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
> It is a lesson I learned myself the hard way :-(
>
>
> Mixing packages from different releases is a seriously bad idea.
> Particularly with libraries on which a whole lot of other packages depend.
> In order to resolve the dependencies y
SNIP
> > Looking at the mirrors I see that libqt3-devel-3.2.2-5mdk is on Cooker
> > and was only put there on 7th November So you have installed a package
> > for Mandrake 10.0 on a 9.1 system.
> >
> > Result -
> >
> > -Dependency Hell-
> >
> > derek
>
> I know what you mean about dependency hell,
> OK so it looks like your urpmi.addmedia commands worked. Only point is that
> the definition for your CD sources seems to be screwed up. Possibly because
> you changed your CD-ROM to be ide-scsi You can correct that using the
> Software Sources GUI in Mandrake control centre.
>
> 2nd point. If y
On Sunday 09 November 2003 8:20 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday 09 Nov 2003 11:57 pm, Scott Naylor wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 November 2003 4:32 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:23 am, Scott Naylor wrote:
> > > > Just a small question, what would be the easiest way to up
On Sunday 09 November 2003 08:43 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
> On Monday 10 November 2003 12:20 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes there is.
> > It is called urpmi and it is posted about almost every day!
> >
> > For the third time today.
> >
> > Go to http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/index.php
> >
On Monday 10 November 2003 12:20 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
> Yes there is.
> It is called urpmi and it is posted about almost every day!
>
> For the third time today.
>
> Go to http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/index.php
>
> Define an online source for Texstar and install KDE using
> rpmdrake. All th
On Sunday 09 Nov 2003 11:57 pm, Scott Naylor wrote:
> On Sunday 09 November 2003 4:32 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:23 am, Scott Naylor wrote:
> > > Just a small question, what would be the easiest way to upgrade KDE 3.1
> > > to its newest release in Mandrake 9.1? I tried
On Sunday 09 November 2003 4:32 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:23 am, Scott Naylor wrote:
> > Just a small question, what would be the easiest way to upgrade KDE 3.1
> > to its newest release in Mandrake 9.1? I tried a couple of things before,
> > but it didn't go so well.
>
On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:23 am, Scott Naylor wrote:
> Just a small question, what would be the easiest way to upgrade KDE 3.1 to
> its newest release in Mandrake 9.1? I tried a couple of things before, but
> it didn't go so well.
Get 3.1.4 in Mandrake RPMS from Texstar's 91 repository.
http:
Just a small question, what would be the easiest way to upgrade KDE 3.1 to its
newest release in Mandrake 9.1? I tried a couple of things before, but it
didn't go so well.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Recently there was a flurry on expert on how to upgrade, so i
compiled it and
put it here:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/UrpmiUpgrade
If i got anything wrong, please let me know or fix it. (i plan to
use the page when i get around to upgrading!)
eric
--
Mandrake HowTo's & More:
On Friday 03 Oct 2003 3:25 am, Teilhard Knight wrote:
> I recently installed version 9.1 both in a desktop computer and in my
> laptop. Do you think it is all right to just erase and install 9.2 in both
> machines? I am specially concerned with my wireless access to Internet. Are
> there any improv
I recently installed version 9.1 both in a desktop computer and in my
laptop. Do you think it is all right to just erase and install 9.2 in both
machines? I am specially concerned with my wireless access to Internet. Are
there any improvement for that?
Derek: I am sorry I have had a lot of work, a
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 18:14, Boulytchev, Vasiliy wrote:
> Ladies and Gents,
> I have some mp3s I need to burn to audio cds. Which package is recommended?
> Grip use lame as encoder
>
> Vasiliy Boulytchev
> Colorado Information Technologies, Inc.
> http://www.coinfotech.com
>
>
>
> __
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:21:59 -0400
"Eric Caron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> What is the limit to the upgrade process before you have to upgrade to
> a newer distro?
Your whole system is built on that version of glibc. AFAIK, there is no
way to upgrade glibc without upgrading every single packa
Hi everybody,
Many times, when I want to install new apps (whether in rpm format or
by building from source), I need a newer version of glibc. For
example:
error: failed dependencies:
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
Is there a way to install these libraries without breaking the system?
I don't wan
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 07:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I am looking to upgrade to 4.3.0 on my Dell laptop running LM9. I
> downloaded all the rpms from the cooker but I'm not sure if it will install
> correctly on Mandrake 9. The reason for this is that I upgraded to a M9
> Radeon card
Hi,
I am looking to upgrade to 4.3.0 on my Dell laptop running LM9. I downloaded
all the rpms from the cooker but I'm not sure if it will install correctly on
Mandrake 9. The reason for this is that I upgraded to a M9 Radeon card and
4.2.0 doesn't have support for it. Apparently drivers are bui
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 16:05, Derek Jennings wrote:
> > Which is the exact way to upgrade from 9.0 to 9.1? where do I read more
> > about upgrading? is there any way I can know that mandrake is actually
> > upgrading my system instead of installing it clean.
> During the install, I think it is aft
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:05:49 +
Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During the install, I think it is after you have set up your mouse a
> screen appears which asks if you are upgrading or installing.
> In any case nothing is written to your hard drive until the partition
> section.
On Friday 28 Mar 2003 12:54 pm, Simone Cortesi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is my first try to upgrade mandrake from a previous installation,
> at the moment i'm running 9.0, I already have the 3 ISOs of 9.1.
>
> My filesystem is as follows:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] simone]$ df
> Filesystem 1K-bloc
Hi,
this is my first try to upgrade mandrake from a previous installation,
at the moment i'm running 9.0, I already have the 3 ISOs of 9.1.
My filesystem is as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] simone]$ df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda5 3723338
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 7:13 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> The 2 are not natively compatible.
> If you upgrade to GTK2++ then none of your current apps which require
> GTK++ will work.
It was my understanding that GTK++1 and GTK++2 would co-exist OK.
ie two shared libraries foo.2.x.x.so and foo.1.x
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 7:14 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> If you uninstall any window widget you will be uninstalling 90% of your
> GUI. You update a shared library by updating it via rpm's. It will test
> first if it can be updated and tell you any issues. Use the rpm -Uvh
> --test rpm-filename.rpm
>> Any comments on my original query?
>> I ask because, on my KMail at least, the thread has been
>> hijacked by another
>> subject... or two.
>>
>> Thanks, and sorry to eat bandwidth it it isn't necessary.
>>
>> On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 10:08 am, Richard Urwin wrote:
>> > I was trying to install the
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 18:30:24 +
Richard Urwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any comments on my original query?
> I ask because, on my KMail at least, the thread has been hijacked by
> another subject... or two.
The 2 are not natively compatible.
If you upgrade to GTK2++ then none of your current
Any comments on my original query?
I ask because, on my KMail at least, the thread has been hijacked by another
subject... or two.
Thanks, and sorry to eat bandwidth it it isn't necessary.
On Sunday 02 Mar 2003 10:08 am, Richard Urwin wrote:
> I was trying to install the latest sources of Glade,
I was trying to install the latest sources of Glade, and found that it needed
a newer version of GTK+ v2 than the mdk9.0 default install provides.
This involves compiling glib, atk, pango and gtk+. I can compile and install
glib, but one of the others detects that I have two copies of glib installe
Is it possible to upgrade xmms to a newer version on MDK 7.0? I have
downloaded xmms 1.2.7. - MDK 7.0 came with xmms 0.9.5.1. I see I need glib
1.2.2 or better. Can I download the necessary libraries and then compile the
new xmms?
George Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 083 4666192
"The soul would ha
> I tried Debian (potato) about a year ago, and found was horrendous to install.
> It eventually installed in "text" mode, but then it took me a week to get it
> running in X! Even then, I was having all sorts of problems. Definitely not
> for the newbie or even the semi-newbie, in my opinion.
On Sunday 01 December 2002 07:11, RCD wrote:
>>> SNIP <<<
> The one really awsome thing about debian and I'm not bashing mandrake
> at all is their upgrade, update system. Using apt-get you can upgrade your
> system to a testing version, or unstable version and then back again
> (although go
>Dear ALL,
>
>I have LM 9 with the KDE3 and would like to upgrade to 3.04. I have not done
>this before, so how does one do this in Mandrake?
>
>Thanks for the help.
>
>Sincerely,
It's really simple. One way is to download all the rpms that you want to upgrade
(minus the *-devel-* stuff, unle
On Thursday 07 November 2002 5:44 pm, Marcia wrote:
> Dear ALL,
>
> I have LM 9 with the KDE3 and would like to upgrade to 3.04. I have not
> done this before, so how does one do this in Mandrake?
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Marcia
The easiest way would be to use the precompiled r
Dear ALL,
I have LM 9 with the KDE3 and would like to upgrade to 3.04. I have not done
this before, so how does one do this in Mandrake?
Thanks for the help.
Sincerely,
Marcia
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Chris wrote:
>I ordered the 9.0 Power Pack the other night, when it comes in what is the
>best way to upgrade? Install over the old 8.2 or backup my /home partition,
>clean off the drive, install 9.0 and then restore my home partiton.
>
On my office box I did a clean sweep because I wanted to
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:44:40 -0500 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ordered the 9.0 Power Pack the other night, when it comes in what is the
> best way to upgrade? Install over the old 8.2 or backup my /home partition,
> clean off the drive, install 9.0 and then restore my home partiton.
I ordered the 9.0 Power Pack the other night, when it comes in what is the
best way to upgrade? Install over the old 8.2 or backup my /home partition,
clean off the drive, install 9.0 and then restore my home partiton. Also,
does anyone know if 9.0 supports the HP Scanjet 4400c or will I stil
Thank you Frank!
Andre---Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
: Monday, 26 August 2002 7:25
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [newbie] Upgrading from 7.1
to 8.2
Ok. Thank you Gavin.
Now another question: how do we do a "fresh" install? What files (or
directories) should I delete? Should I format the hard drive and
Ok. Thank you Gavin.
Now another question: how do we do a "fresh" install? What files (or directories) should I delete? Should I format the hard drive and start from scratch (if so how would I retain my home directory as you suggest)?
AndreDo You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quo
Andre,
That's a nice jump your thinking about making, I would suggest 1st. backing
up your IMPORTANT FILES, next do a fresh install..(do NOT delete your home
directory (if important info is there) during the install!!) I've tried to do
an update before from 7.2 to 8.0 and I ran into some file
1 - 100 of 346 matches
Mail list logo
