On Seg 09 Dez 2002 21:04, gklofa wrote:
uh I quite have the same problem and the solution is:
First and most important: get rid of linuxconf, if you've never used, please,
don't
Second: Affter the first solution, it's been quite easy to keep my connection
on mdk9.0 adsl.
But, do you
O.K. ALL
some good developments here.
I have set up my modem to a static setup. This obviously meant that my
windows xp and red hat systems would not connect to the internet after
setting it. This was o.k., all I did was go in, change the settings
from dhcp assigning, to a static address. This
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 20:09, greg wrote:
Instead of depending on the MCC Wizards, why not just open up a nice
terminal window, and type:
netconfig
...put in all the proper information that you need to put in, save the
configuration - linuxconf will direct you to what services need to be
Hello.
On Sat 2002-12-07 at 17:17:19 +1100, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 16:00, Mark Weaver wrote:
[...]
AND, dig this - those installations are going on the SAME machine -
nothing changed. Nothing. Nada.
The first five times I installed MDK on this workstation, I changed some
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 20:09, greg wrote:
O.K. ALL
some good developments here.
Excellent! Just what I like to hear :)
I have set up my modem to a static setup. This obviously meant that my
windows xp and red hat systems would not connect to the internet after
setting it. This was o.k., all
Well here we are guys, this is an email coming from my mandrake
system! But I have been in this pos before, but when re-boot, loose it
all and no connection again! I am not going to re-boot at this point in
time. To get it connected this time, it did not automatically connect
on boot, I had to
On Monday 09 December 2002 05:04 pm, gklofa wrote:
Well here we are guys, this is an email coming from my mandrake
system! But I have been in this pos before, but when re-boot, loose it
all and no connection again! I am not going to re-boot at this point in
time. To get it connected this
Greg,
Sorry this is late getting back to you (I lost a hard drive so was out
of commission for a bit (well, intermittantly it was going bad till it
died totally)). Anyway, I'm glad you got your problem resolved. The
GATEWAY issue I was referring to applied to having an ethernet card and
using a
Dennis,
these are the settings used right accross all my systems, windows and
red hat included, as well as windows 98 downstairs. They all work fine
and fast, so I don't know. Maybe you have a different setup. This
modem/router has all the relevant details to access my provider in it,
i.e isp
Hi all, and thanks to those who have replied with support (david, john,
anne,joeb,alexa,marcia,jose,mark,stephan). Sorry for not replying
sooner, but working very hard at the moment, and just turned my computer
on today. I now have Red Hat back on, but I did a full re-install of
Mandrake 9.0,
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 21:15, greg wrote:
When installing Mandrake, I have selected (when setting up net/internet)
the ethernet option, and selected bootp/dhcp instead of entering any
details. This is how Red Hat is configured (ethernet connection/dhcp)
and works no probs. After this,
On Sunday 08 Dec 2002 10:15 am, greg wrote:
Anyway, I will try to answer the questions that you all asked in one
email, so that it is all in one place, and also give a run-down on what
my system is, and what I have done.
It does help to have as much information as possible in one place.
On Sunday 08 Dec 2002 10:48 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
If eth0 doesn't show up, no matter what you do, you're not going to get
on the internet (or any net for that matter). What about disabling
PNP/OS in your BIOS and see if that works?
Once you can LEGITIMATELY get your ethernet card working,
On Sunday 08 December 2002 11:15, greg wrote:
When installing Mandrake, I have selected (when setting up
net/internet) the ethernet option, and selected bootp/dhcp instead of
entering any details. This is how Red Hat is configured (ethernet
connection/dhcp) and works no probs. After this,
On Sunday 08 Dec 2002 11:50 am, Martin L. Johansen wrote:
On Sunday 08 December 2002 11:15, greg wrote:
When installing Mandrake, I have selected (when setting up
net/internet) the ethernet option, and selected bootp/dhcp instead of
entering any details. This is how Red Hat is configured
Hi Greg,
This is getting to be a long story, so I'll only include the essentials
from previous mails...
If interested,
here is what is in the modems internal software:
PPP (VPI 8, VCI 35) ipa
ipa 150.101.208.30 255.255.0.0
eth010.0.0.138 255.0.0.0
loop
On Sunday 08 December 2002 12:54, Anne Wilson wrote:
I have a table set up on my router with static IP addresses. All the
machines use those static addresses, except the laptop which is set
to get an address from the router. The router has a fixed address
to offer that login, so it works
You cant tell me his Realtec card is not supported? I believe every
Linux distro supports that chip set. Can he try loading the correct
module with modprobe?
--
http://www.winsweptrottweilers.com
ICQ# 55846749
Registered Linux user #191829
A Cherokee Prayer:
Oh Great Spirit,
Help me
No. I think the problem is the nic is not initialized. He said he was
seeing initizing of eth0 failed error...
John McQuillen wrote:
Hi Greg,
This is getting to be a long story, so I'll only include the essentials
from previous mails...
If interested,
here is what is in the modems
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 23:44, Dale Kosan wrote:
No. I think the problem is the nic is not initialized. He said he was
seeing initizing of eth0 failed error...
If the nic fails to get an address because of a dhcp error, won't
initialisation of the interface fail?
It's not clear from the posts
- Original Message -
From: Ronald J. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 10:52:14 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] about to give up
On Sunday 08 December 2002 07:39 am, you wrote:
A Cherokee Prayer:
Oh Great Spirit,
Help me always to speak
On Sunday 08 December 2002 06:50 am, you wrote:
Third... if it aint working still... try another PCI-bus. You might have
a conflict. I had that problem once. I moved the card, and all was a
bliss.
You can do a cat /proc/interrupts and it should show if the card is causing
an IRQ conflict
On Monday 09 December 2002 04:52, Joseph Braddock wrote:
PCI is funny that way. Your plug and play bios and/or OS have to
pick some order in which to initialize the cards. If one of the
cards has a limited number of IRQs it can use and a different card
grabs that IRQ first, then the limited
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 05:00, Mark Weaver wrote:
David Robertson wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 11:41, Mark Weaver wrote:
David,
How is it that you're configuring your network and dialup settings? I've
got two Mandrake 8.2 servers running. Setup network once and haven't had
to touch it
Hi,
I am so dissapointed with the mandrake package. It has all the looks, and
frills, but the system itself has failed me in one of the most critical
ways. No internet! So annoying. Windows has no probs fully setup first
time I boot in, with no further configuration, Red Hat the same, didn't
greg wrote:
Hi,
I am so dissapointed with the mandrake package. It has all the looks, and
frills, but the system itself has failed me in one of the most critical
ways. No internet! So annoying. Windows has no probs fully setup first
time I boot in, with no further configuration, Red Hat the
I has similar problems with my Toshiba laptop until I upgraded to a PCMCIA
hardware modem. Now everything works wonderfully and I spend most of my time
in Mandrake Linux 9.0. I was also just able to get Ogle to play DVDs on the
same machine.
On Friday 06 December 2002 06:41 am, Mark Weaver
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 11:41, Mark Weaver wrote:
greg wrote:
Hi,
I am so dissapointed with the mandrake package. It has all the looks, and
frills, but the system itself has failed me in one of the most critical
ways. No internet! So annoying. Windows has no probs fully setup first
greg wrote:
Hi,
I am so dissapointed with the mandrake package. It has all the looks, and
frills, but the system itself has failed me in one of the most critical
ways. No internet! So annoying. Windows has no probs fully setup first
time I boot in, with no further configuration, Red Hat the
On Friday 06 Dec 2002 10:23 am, greg wrote:
Hi,
I am so dissapointed with the mandrake package. It has all the looks, and
frills, but the system itself has failed me in one of the most critical
ways. No internet!
Greg, I've only vuagely read this thread, since I've been very busy and the
the 2 were the next 2 lines...
what they say
and what they do
*g*
took me a bit to figure it out, too
--- Original Message ---
From: Todd Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] about to give up
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:41:03PM +0100, Paul wrote:
In reply
back with whether this is your situation or not. And if not, could you
describe, one more time, your modem, the problem and what you have tried to fix it.
Joeb
---Original Message---
From: greg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/06/02 04:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] about
Greg, please try again. I know it feels hopeless and it took me three
different installs, and the last time two plus days to get it on, but it
is so worth it. I have only 8.2 but two things did happen during
installs. The first few times I installed it didn't recognize my a drive
or zip,or cd,
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 03:08, Todd Slater wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:41:03PM +0100, Paul wrote:
In reply to David's mail, d.d. 06 Dec 2002 11:56:42 +:
Having said that, I do still think Mandrake is a great package: they all
have their faults!
I know Linux's faults are many
On Friday 06 December 2002 04:23, greg wrote:
Hi,
I am so dissapointed with the mandrake package. It has all the looks, and
frills, but the system itself has failed me in one of the most critical
ways. No internet! So annoying. Windows has no probs fully setup first
time I boot in, with
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:30:18AM +1100, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 03:08, Todd Slater wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:41:03PM +0100, Paul wrote:
In reply to David's mail, d.d. 06 Dec 2002 11:56:42 +:
Having said that, I do still think Mandrake is a great
On Friday 06 December 2002 05:23 am, greg wrote:
Hi,
I am so dissapointed with the mandrake package. It has all the
looks, and frills, but the system itself has failed me in one of the
most critical ways. No internet! So annoying. Windows has no probs
fully setup first time I boot in,
David Robertson wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 11:41, Mark Weaver wrote:
greg wrote:
Hi,
I am so dissapointed with the mandrake package. It has all the looks, and
frills, but the system itself has failed me in one of the most critical
ways. No internet! So annoying. Windows has no probs
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 16:00, Mark Weaver wrote:
David,
How is it that you're configuring your network and dialup settings? I've
got two Mandrake 8.2 servers running. Setup network once and haven't had
to touch it since. One Mandrake 9.0 server running - same thing there.
My workstation
Hi there. :)
After some frustrating hours of trying to set up SAMBA, by the book, I'm now
faced with SWAT telling me that neither SMBD or NMBD are running. Curious
thing is that they are when I check running processes. Further..when I
restart SMBD SWAT reports it as not running but it does
John
A few comments
1/ Your workgroup name is LINUX, that means the workgroup name in your Windows
boxes must also be LINUX (The default workgroup for a Windows box is
WORKGROUP)
2/ A lot of your statements are unnecessary. Here is part of my smb.conf
[global]
path = /var/spool/cups
Actually it's a new install. I originally wanted to get 7.1, but I
mistakenly ordered 7.0. No big deal I've downloaded the ISO for 7.1 at
work and I only have to burn the CD's yet. However, I'm finding 7.0 isn't
as well behaved as I was led to believe. I absolutely LOVE the look, feel,
bells and
Here's something wild. Last night after getting the first reply to this
list about how to get fetchmail to run in the background and get the mail
at a set interval someone had said something about needing a script to
start it every time I bootes the machine. Well, last night I started
fetchmail
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, you wrote:
I have mine set up as a cron job. Create a .fetchmailrc in your normal user's
home directory that will fetch mail from all your accounts, then set up a cron
job to run as that user at a specifed interval. I get lots of mail so my
interval is 4 minutes. Works
] About to give up.
Hello again
I'm going to try this one last time before I give up.
A few months back I bought linux-mandrake 6.1 I installed a few progams
one being qpopper mail server, It worked fine.
A few weeks ago I downloaded and installed mandrake 7.0 I did
/
- Original Message -
From: Everette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:40 PM
Subject: [newbie] About to give up.
Hello again
I'm going to try this one last time before I give up.
A few months back I bought linux
]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:40 PM
Subject: [newbie] About to give up.
Hello again
I'm going to try this one last time before I give up.
A few months back I bought linux-mandrake 6.1 I installed a few progams
one being qpopper mail server, It worked fine
"Michael H. Collins" wrote:
My fetchmail does not need a cron job, one can set the interval for
checking in fetchmail itself.
How does one accomplish this?
--
Mark
I love my Linux box...
My Linux Box ROCKS!
On 15 Jun, Mark Weaver wrote:
"Michael H. Collins" wrote:
My fetchmail does not need a cron job, one can set the interval for
checking in fetchmail itself.
How does one accomplish this?
fetchmail -d
fetchmail -help is also useful.
L
--
Laurent Duperval
From "man fetchmail":
DAEMON MODE
The --daemon or -d option runs fetchmail in daemon mode. You
must specify a
numeric argument which is a polling interval in seconds.
In daemon mode, fetchmail puts itself in background and runs
forever, query
ing each
Type in
telnet themachineyou'reworkingon 25
(Wait a few seconds then type (not a typo below))
HELO themachineyou'reworkingon
It should say pleased to meet you ect ect.
If it does not say pleased to meet you then sendmail is not configured
properly and that is what's giving you hell.
As for
At 11:40 PM 6/13/00 -0400, you wrote:
Hello again
I'm going to try this one last time before I give up.
A few months back I bought linux-mandrake 6.1 I installed a few progams
one being qpopper mail server, It worked fine.
A few weeks ago I downloaded and installed mandrake 7.0 I did a
: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:40 PM
Subject: [newbie] About to give up.
Hello again
I'm going to try this one last time before I give up.
A few months back I bought linux-mandrake 6.1 I installed a few progams
one being qpopper mail server, It worked fine.
A few weeks ago I
and all is fine.
-
Click here for Free Video!!
http://www.gohip.com/free_video/
- Original Message -
From: Everette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:40 PM
Subject: [newbie] About
Hello again
I'm going to try this one last time before I give up.
A few months back I bought linux-mandrake 6.1 I installed a few progams
one being qpopper mail server, It worked fine.
A few weeks ago I downloaded and installed mandrake 7.0 I did a
complete install doing away with every thing I
On 13 Jun 00, at 23:40, Everette wrote:
Well it looked like every thing setup OK so I reinstalled qpopper but it
want work now in fact I tried some other mail server software and can't
get any of thm to work.
A better option to qpopper and faster is fetchmail. It is usually
installed by
56 matches
Mail list logo
