On 2/27/08, Douglas E. Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to build the off the SVN source using msys and mingw and
have some questions.
Thanks for trying!
I need OpenSSL and Zlib and ltdl (until you change the code) and would
like to use the versions that were built for Windows
help,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[1] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-trunk-mingw32-004.tar.bz2
[2] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org
On 2/26/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There were a lot of issues with rutoken...
I've fixed at least some issues in mingw32 branch.
Do we need/should we also fix the issues in trunk?
I imagine
minimalistic MingW install has
no support for it, nor for readline or zlib).
cheers,
JJK
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hi!
Waiting for your input :)
Alon
On 2/14/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4
On 2/25/08, Douglas E. Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No that is not left over, but maybe it should have been ifdefed.
The PIV is for the new card the U.S. government is issuing to most
government employees and contractors.
The leftover is the #include directives.
Alon.
There were a lot of issues with rutoken...
I've fixed at least some issues in mingw32 branch.
Alon.
On 2/26/08, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 23:49:37 schrieb Douglas E. Engert:
pkcs15-prkey-rutoken.c also has problems with u_int32_t,
unsigned
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. openct, pcsc and nsplugins features are disabled by default.
I don't think it's a good idea to by default disable most used reader
interfaces by default, as I'd expect most software to behave nicely
after a
On 2/7/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 1:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 3367
Author: alonbl
Date: 2008-02-06 12:44:11 + (Wed, 06 Feb 2008)
Log Message:
---
Add util_ prefix to util module, avoid symbol conflicts
On 2/6/08, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:00:48PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
well, itis more about which libraries the dll depends on. don't
know too much about mingw, and if they are 99.9% compatible or
100%.
100%
Yep. MinGW is a full win32 gcc, so
On 2/4/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
If you are Windows OpenSC user, I need your help!
I've modified the OpenSC build to use alternative compiler for
Windows. I need acknowledgment that it works the same as always.
I will be gratefull to receive some feedback!
Hello
Hello,
Decided to rework this.
Now when svn checkout, the xsl-stylesheets will be downloaded from upstream.
No system dependency is needed.
As we are already depended on online connection for make dist, I
believe this is the simplest solution.
What do you think?
Alon.
On 2/7/08, Alon Bar-Lev
On 2/7/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to have this value as default?
And have distribution specific code?
I don't like this... Packages should be distribution independent... I
will add some detection code...
And let a user explicitely use
On 2/7/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 12:19 PM, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just checked out a new solution...
I hope you will be happy with it.
It detects svn checkout and defaults man to disabled.
Ok. Now ./configure make works.
But what do YOU
On 2/7/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the value of whatever in your case?
What does/must this directory contain?
Two files:
html/docbook.xsl manpages/docbook.xsl
It is part of a package:
http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/DocBookXslStylesheets
Gentoo provides this as:
On 2/4/08, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most important for me would be: can the resultung binary be used with CSPs?
The result binary is a standard PKCS#11... So it should work... :)
BTW: Why didn't you enabled the selection of the PKCS#11 library of
the CSP11 to be configurable
On 2/5/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is far more comfortable for users to have
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE. I found a page [1] with some pros and cons.
bye
[1] http://htmlhelp.dotsrc.org/page.php/automake/automake_143.html
Well... I fully agree with [1]... There is no
On 2/5/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that will fail if you to not have automake/autoconf installed or
with the correct versions.
True.
It is enough to do a touch Makefile.am to trigger the rebuild rule.
Right... You should not do this...
I remember having problems with
On Feb 5, 2008 9:02 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 13:43:58 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
On 2/4/08, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most important for me would be: can the resultung binary be used with
CSPs?
The result binary
On 2/3/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think about it now, a system_xyz.c file (much like pcsc-lite)
with direct wrappers for win32 api would be a better choice than
'require libtool on windows'.
That would be a reimplementation of libltdl, wouldn't be?
I do not use
On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I didn't knew that there is such a flag now...of course there is
readline, will try it with it next time ;-)
It should had been autodetected...
Next time, please send me the config.log too, so I know what is wrong.
Alon.
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think about it now, a system_xyz.c file (much like pcsc-lite)
with direct wrappers for win32 api would be a better choice than
'require libtool on windows'.
I think so too...
Thanks!
___
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that OpenSC and the primary interface (PKCS#11) is
actually executed with system privileges
unless you use it in tandem of some system-privileges software (like
CSP11 for example)
CSP also is loaded into the context of an
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Using Manifests requires to be more dependent on Microsoft
technologies. Also it has nothing to do with security. A simpler
solution would be to create a new DLL name for each release
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Yes. I don't want to do this on compile time, but on Runtime, there
must be
some way
On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I get why I don't receive your mails correctly.. You are using HTML mail...
Thanks for the info.
(BTW, Sun, AIX and others do have the gcc compiler so I don't see a problem
here, except that one can build it on Linux)
MinGW
On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However if there are enough builders and developers for the MS platform and
it works better with MS compiler etc. then why not? But if nobody maintains
the code within reasonable time, I prefer to rely on MinGW or other OSS
tools.
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. No version and other resources for DLLs and EXEs, it may be added
in future if important.
Finished with this one.
The only noticeable change is the lack of manifests as mingw does not
support these.
Alon
On 2/2/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only active system I know where pcsc-lite has less arguments is on
Mac OS X Tiger currently. On Linux I believe most up to date
distributions ship with a newer pcsc-lite. There are some but very-
very seldom e-mails to lists or personal
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows binaries are available at [1], source tarball is available at [2].
As far as I know this should work. I need people to test this.
Updated binaries and source are available for testing, include totally
dynamic pcsc support, and resource
Done.
Thanks.
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 8:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added internal-winscard with minimum contents.
branches/alonbl/mingw/src/libopensc/part10.h
You could merge part10.h into the internal header as well. It is there
only
On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing the proposed opensc from
http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
Configure works on ML-5 (StartCom MultiMedia) with ./configure
--enable-openct --enable-pcsc-lite --enable-nsplugin, however PCSC isn't
this as
base.
Any comments/recommendations will be appreciated.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[1] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-trunk-mingw32-001.tar.bz2
[2] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
[3] http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/browser/branches/alonbl/mingw
On 2/1/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Alon, this sounds like a good deal! So I'm afraid I can't help with
Winedoze and can't voice an opinion on that part...I didn't even knew that
it requires MS compilers ;-)
Thanks!
You can check if the new tarball compiles and
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It took some effort, but at the end I have a test release that uses a
single autoconf/automake/libtool build system for all operating
systems.
Forgot to describe how to build for Windows...
I build using cross compile on Linux to mingw32 target
On 2/2/08, Douglas E. Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? Using the vendor's compiler is common on many platforms,
especially if your code is in the kernel, or is security
related, like OpenSC and runs with operating system privileges.
I disagree completely, and believe the other way around.
On 11/8/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first step is to make /usr/lib/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so usable.
OK.
So do it the other way around...
Make the link in lib... :)
Alon.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
Strange!
I don't have this error.
Are you sure the slot id is correct?
Try pkcs11-tool --list-slots
Alon.
On 9/1/07, Gürer Özen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In our AKIS PKCS-15 setup, PrKDF and PuKDF files need CHV for read access.
That is conformant to the RSA EID Conformance Profile Spec file
On 8/14/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/08/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added the _CFLAGS variable whever the ltdl.h file is searched so it will
be
found and added back the libassuan.m4 file, as I think without we will annoy
quite a number of
On 8/14/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks Alon and Ludovic!
I added the _CFLAGS variable whever the ltdl.h file is searched so it will be
found and added back the libassuan.m4 file, as I think without we will annoy
quite a number of users (it hit already two active
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other comment?
No... :)
There are just too many weird things in configure...
I am afraid to touch...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
would be nice to get this working, but we need to set LTLIBLTDL or similar
(or adjust the autoconf makefiles - I prefer not setting LIBS so we can
add -lltdl only where needed and not on a global scale).
Attached.
also we need to
check
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4?
The should be provided and maintained by the packages installed at
your system...
I don't want to force people into installing libassuan-dev. they would if we
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4?
The should be provided and maintained by the packages installed at
your system...
They should be removed from svn.
Exact. I also suggested (and committed) that
But PKCS#11 is interactive API.
How do you suggest the response to be handled?
On 8/8/07, Ph. Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alon!
Another idea I just had ...
If the forwarding driver supports serializing the PKCS#11-commands, how about
spooling them into some file, and replaying them
On 8/8/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the problem with automake 1.10
$ ./autogen.sh
+ aclocal -I aclocal
+ libtoolize --copy --force --automake
+ autoheader --force
+ autoconf --force
+ automake-1.10 --add-missing --copy --force --foreign
configure.in:198: required
On 7/21/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007 22:17:00 Klaus Heinz wrote:
This is the same issue I have with openct and the automatic detection
of pcsc-lite. If it's possible to use openct without pcsc-lite and this
is a supported configuration I prefer to
Hello Andreas,
On 7/17/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenSC - new version 0.11.3
In next version, can you please add --enable-plugin so that the plugin
will be built/installed only if requested?
I don't see many people using it, and the libassuan, pinentry
dependency can be
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you don't have libassuan installed, then opensc should compile
fine (and not create the plugin). does that work for you?
Yes it does.
But if I have gnupg install, I already have libassuan, it does not
suggest I want to use it with
proprietary drivers.
Can anyone help me?
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
---
$ pkcs15-init --reader 2 --profile asepcos+default --erase
--create-pkcs15 --verbose
Connecting to card in reader SCM SCR 335 (00) 00 00...
Using card driver Athena ASEPCOS.
About to erase card.
About to create
] sec.c:201:sc_pin_cmd: returning with: PIN code or key incorrect
[pkcs15-init] pkcs15-lib.c:3105:do_get_and_verify_secret: Failed to
verify PIN (ref=0x0)
Failed to create PKCS #15 meta structure: PIN code or key incorrect
Alon.
On 7/20/07, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what happends if you run LIBASSUAN_CONFIG=/bin/false ./configure
?
Oh...
For now, I've used --with-libassuan-prefix=tmp
document this hack and good? very few people have the problem you mention
so I think it is good enough?
No...
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007 20:41:52 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
No...
Please explicitly add --enable-nsplugin or something.
So that if you add dependency no additional hacks will be nessesery.
ok. thanks, commited.
There is another issue
On 7/20/07, Nils Larsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you send me the opensc debug log (including the APDUs
send to the card) ?
I guess you mean the attached?
If not, please send me some instructions.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[pkcs15-init] ctx.c:704:sc_context_create
On 7/2/07, Bud P. Bruegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alon,
have you already made progress in the implementation? I was very
interested in this since I'd like to write some non-traditional pkcs#11
module and I'd prefer to do that in python... I was wondering whether
the forwarding driver
On 7/2/07, Jim Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We do something like this to translate kerberos tickets into cert/key usable
from pkcs11. But it only makes sense if you have some way to convince the
CA that it should sign the keypair and issue a cert. In our case that's
kerberos. Otherwise,
should be done in OpenSSL.
In order to allow common configuration and behavior the NSS part
should not use its internal keystore.
But this kind of investment is out of my scope... Please remember I am
not getting paid for this.
Alon.
On 6/16/07, Robert Relyea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev
the mappers.
But the current state requires too much work...
I regret to say, I don't have the time right now. I think that before
the NSS additions, I could have cleaned up the code faster...
Sorry,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On 6/12/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/06/07, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL
Hello Ludovic,
Something is different with this version.
When I unlock xsession I see messages like:
Please insert smart card or enter user name
Must press OK
Smart card inserted
Must press OK
Welcome name
Must press OK
This is very annoying...
What was changed?
On 6/11/07, Ludovic Rousseau
shrink up the code if next version will use pkcs11-helper :)
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
-Lev.
On 6/11/07, Robert Relyea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 6/11/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This new version contains the patches from RedHat to use NSS instead
of OpenSSL and many other improvements they made. See the
ChangeLog.svn file
option that works equally well is of course to teach
ssh-agent PKCS#11.
This what I have done.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
On 5/9/07, Ph. Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be very good! If there's something I can help you with (eg.
testing), just ask -- I'll try to reserve some time for you.
That's great!
Do you have any implementation concepts/ideas? Or do you want start them here?
Yes... Some thoughts:
On 5/9/07, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/openssh-pkcs11
Yes, but that's not what I had in mind.
SSH already secures and forwards ssh-agent communication. It would be
more practical and possibly also more secure to have a proxy that
looks like an
On 5/6/07, Nate Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 4/24/07, Nate Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I'm working on building a complete PKCS#11 provider for CAPI. So by
supporting PKCS#11 you'd be able to have things like CAPI support.
This is great to hear
Bar-Lev.
On 4/24/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Clizio,
I think spliting client and server is the right thing to go.
While I share Alons reservations when it comes to using
tcp/ip, I don't see a reason to not do that, if someone wants
to do that. might work well in thinclient
TCP
socket, so this is a great way to solve the HSM issue as well... All
you need to expose is local PKCS#11 interface...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On 4/22/07, Clizio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse me if I enter into this discussion. But, as the author of LSM-PKCS11,
I'd like to answer
to use local smartcard in order to open a session to remote HSM.
I was more concerned regarding the statement that locking and
multi-application cannot be implemented without a daemon component. It
sounds a bit strange as I know several providers which implement this.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev
by all
the open source community as a standalone package which installs it at
include directory.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
interface... So the user ends up with multiple versions of
the same file...
I think that the simplest way is maintaiing it as a package... But we
had this discussion in the past, right? :)
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel
argue with
providing people to freely use your products. I hope this will be
changed.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
to integrate smartcard support correctly
into their applications.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
for QCA.
It is horrible!
autoconf/automake is much better!
In stead of using a scripting engine, they reinvented the wheel, and
created the most complex definition language the could think of. Even
a simple if statement is a mess.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev
for a package compatibility... Compiling your package in so many
different environment helps in discovering issue you did not think of.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
On 12/9/06, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if it helps... commited to trunk, thanks! Can you have a look at
the wiki and document the options somewhere, if you find a fiting place?
Done!
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc
On Friday 08 December 2006 20:20, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hi!
I've modified pkcs11-helper to use the new free pkcs11.h header.
I was surprised that it went relatively OK, good work! :)
Some modifications:
One more:
6. Cast CKR_VENDOR_DEFINED to ck_rv_t so compiler will not
complain about
On Friday 08 December 2006 20:28, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 20:20, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hi!
I've modified pkcs11-helper to use the new free pkcs11.h header.
I was surprised that it went relatively OK, good work! :)
Some modifications:
One more:
One more... I
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 12:04, Christian Horn wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:35:30PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
1. You don't expect application to require the user to store the
PIN hard coded in configuration file...
[...]
3. If the user removes and inserts his card
it does, link to it etc?
That would be great.
I sometime discover new smart card applications/programs (like the
pkcs11-helper from Alon Bar-Lev) that could have helped me.
Thanks!
But before we do, I think we need to define what is smartcard support...
There are quality criteria that should be listed
On 11/27/06, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
3. If the user removes and inserts his card, the application should
reprompt for PIN when private object is accessed.
4. If the user removes the card from one reader and insert it to
another reader
.
Most importantly, they need to UNDERSTAND what is considered to be
best practice.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
On Monday 27 November 2006 22:12, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Sure it does, it makes users crazy if you re-prompt them for
certificate that was already selected.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149673
Opened: 2002-06-06 12:12
the above.
---
Now, that I am about to be out of work :) I am also offering my help
in maintaining OpenSC PKCS#11 provider.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org
401 - 483 of 483 matches
Mail list logo
