To many questions...
Authentication - nothing. I struggled to find any information of how NFS
access control works. For some reason the NFS shares are accessible from the
Macs but not from the Windows PC. I very much suspect its something to do with
permissions on the file.
I have no LDAP
Thanks, I'll try the permissions thing first and then just share via SMB as
well.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
There are a lot of options for data storage.
In my mind, ideal solution is EMC Clarion (i really like it:)) or some other
specialized hardware & soft. For self-build soft I would look at FreeBSD or
some specialized solution like FreeBSD-based FreeNAS (http://freenas.org/) or
OpenSolaris-based
I know there's no realistic quantitative measurement. But even "gut feel"
of some people who are regularly active in the code would be interesting
knowledge.
Roughly what percentage of solaris/opensolaris codebase is developed by
sun/oracle employees, and what percentage is contributed by the
Hi duncan, since you are having issues with NFS and your windows file sharing
setting...looking into samba and smb would be a great option since it supports
better integration with the windows environment. Can you tell us what are you
using for authentication...LDAP, pam,files or active director
Hi edward, try checking the permissions and the folder/file ownership. I am
almost certain something is wrong along those lines. Take care. Lisandro
--Original Message--
From: Edward Martinez
Sender: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subje
Hi steve, my two cents on the matter...opensolaris is here to stay as future
builds are developed and OS surpasses its current level of maturity. I think it
will be foolish for Oracle to terminated the project since a great deal of
their OS revenue is coming from Opensolaris and their enterprise
Steve wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>I've been reading a lot of the threads on here about the future of
> opensolaris, and it seems that there *might* be a future, depending on whose
> post you read. While I truly hope for that, I would like a definitive answer,
> or at least one I could work off o
Steve,
Oracle's account managers handle this sort of thing. The other solution
is talk to someone like Nexenta.
Now ensure you understand is that somone like Oracle may look at 'best tool for
the job' so what is 'under the hood' may or may not be what you expect.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 6/3/
Greetings,
I've been reading a lot of the threads on here about the future of
opensolaris, and it seems that there *might* be a future, depending on whose
post you read. While I truly hope for that, I would like a definitive answer,
or at least one I could work off of in the future.
Right
On Jun 3, 2010, at 4:19 AM, bsd wrote:
> "Matrurity of Linux"
>
> That is a funny mix of words, and certainly not how I would conjoin them.
> Consider SLES9 was released only a few years ago, yet with an ext3 filessytem
> you cannot grow it online! In AIX 3.2, circa 1995, you could grow a
>
Thanks, everyone! I have a *small* understanding now of OpenSolaris disks! The
disk is now mounted and I used ls -l to list it by mount point when I finished
mapping it out.
(In case anyone was wondering, I originally wrote moron in one
sentence. The blog five-starred it when I reviewed the blo
The output of format shows disks, not partitions.
Run:
fdisk /dev/rdsk/c8d0p0
You should see the defined partitions there. The first partition maps
to: /dev/rdsk/c8d0p1, the second to p2, etc.
- Keith
On 06/ 3/10 02:04 PM, Andrew Greimann wrote:
Thanks for the commands and support so far.
Thanks for the commands and support so far. The only issue is that when I type
the commands you had specified,
and...@netbook:~# rmformat
Looking for devices...
No removables found.
and...@netbook:~# format
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c8d0
/p...@0,
On 6/3/2010 11:45 AM, bsd wrote:
Part of AIX's strength is that is runs on dedicated hardware, so what you ask
means nothing.
Not so much that it runs on "dedicated" hardware, but that it runs on
*well-designed* hardware. You can build *well-designed* hardware with
commodity parts, but
On 6/3/2010 5:06 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
03.06.2010 14:01, Edward Martinez пишет:
On 06/ 1/10 11:59 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
I just read AMD opterons and Linux is powering
the
worlds fastest supercomputer. If the x86 platform
an
Part of AIX's strength is that is runs on dedicated hardware, so what you ask
means nothing.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mike Gerdts writes:
> Good starting points are:
>
> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+indiana/building_on
> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/downloads#HBuildingOpenSolaris
Thanks .. great clues.
I noticed at the first URL the author made the mistake often made,
that everyone i
The ark has been developed by the men led by God's hands, hasn't it?
Professional above all professionals! (no irony, no sarcasm)
Since bsdfan in the comment before mine describe AIx as a
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Mike Gerdts writes:
>
>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
>>
>>> All that said, I'm still a little mystified as to why the "normal"
>>> development builds are being held back.
>>
>> Could it be because "pkg image update" i
Sorry I've replied to the post late! Thank you for the help so far!
I'll work with the terminal using the commands you've supplied and get back to
you shortly.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolari
Duncan Groenewald
writes:
> The NFS share is already set up and works fine from my Macbook, just
> not from the Windows PC. But the the Macbook is running UNIX and
> the user ID is the same as the user id on the opensolaris server.
I think you were on the right track wondering if smb would not
Mike Gerdts writes:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
>
>> All that said, I'm still a little mystified as to why the "normal"
>> development builds are being held back.
>
> Could it be because "pkg image update" is known to work pretty well
> going forward (b134 -> b134b) but
On 03.06.2010 14:54, bsd wrote:
> IBM has released AIX 6.1 with three different price levels: express edition,
> standard edition, and enterprise edition. The express edition costs $300 per
> core.
And how well does AIX run on hardware with no RS6000 or PowerPC processor?
//Svein
--
---
The ark has been developed by the men led by God's hands, hasn't
it?Professional above all professionals! (no irony, no sarcasm)
The main fact is that at some point during development you experiencevery high
challenges due to mistakes you made during the early timesof design and
development whe
> The NFS share is already set up and works fine from
> my Macbook, just not from the Windows PC. But the
> the Macbook is running UNIX and the user ID is the
> same as the user id on the opensolaris server.
If it's works with other UNIX then I the think something may be wrong on the
windows sid
The NFS share is already set up and works fine from my Macbook, just not from
the Windows PC. But the the Macbook is running UNIX and the user ID is the
same as the user id on the opensolaris server.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
ope
> IBM has released AIX 6.1 with three different price
> levels: express edition, standard edition, and
> enterprise edition. The express edition costs $300
> per core.
>
> Three hundred per core with the features available,
> GLVM, KSPK, Kernel Recovery, etc.; it is more
> bang-for-the-buck than
> Thanks, yes I have the Windows NFSClient installed
> and the share gets mounted correctly. Just unable to
> access the files on the share - presumably because
> some permissions need to be set on the server side.
Then I think "sharectl" command needs to be used along with "sharemgr" i can be
w
IBM has released AIX 6.1 with three different price levels: express edition,
standard edition, and enterprise edition. The express edition costs $300 per
core.
Three hundred per core with the features available, GLVM, KSPK, Kernel
Recovery, etc.; it is more bang-for-the-buck than you would ge
Thanks, yes I have the Windows NFSClient installed and the share gets mounted
correctly. Just unable to access the files on the share - presumably because
some permissions need to be set on the server side.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
> Hi, I have a ZFS share but am unable to access the
> share from a Windows PC. The windows PC mounts the
> share but indicates No Access.
>
> I can't find any useful information on how to grant
> access to an NFS share. Any ideas on how to give a
> user on a WIndows PC access to the NFS share.
Hi, I have a ZFS share but am unable to access the share from a Windows PC.
The windows PC mounts the share but indicates No Access.
I can't find any useful information on how to grant access to an NFS share.
Any ideas on how to give a user on a WIndows PC access to the NFS share. They
don'
> 03.06.2010 14:01, Edward Martinez пишет:
> >> On 06/ 1/10 11:59 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just read AMD opterons and Linux is powering
> the
> >>>
> >> worlds fastest supercomputer. If the x86 platform
> and
> >> Linux now has the capacity to produce this type
> of
>
Thank you paul for this great explanation.
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gress
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:50:31
To:
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] The Case of The Missing Drive
___
opensolaris-d
Well, despite i agree with you to a certain degree don't you think you
are being a little bit "unbalanced" towards IBM tech?
Despite the fact that Linux does indeed lacks some things, it also
provides quite a huge amount of enterprise features but for a fraction
of the price of AIX.
It's like havi
"Matrurity of Linux"
That is a funny mix of words, and certainly not how I would conjoin them.
Consider SLES9 was released only a few years ago, yet with an ext3 filessytem
you cannot grow it online! In AIX 3.2, circa 1995, you could grow a filesystem
online. A supposedly modern operating sy
03.06.2010 14:01, Edward Martinez пишет:
On 06/ 1/10 11:59 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
I just read AMD opterons and Linux is powering the
worlds fastest supercomputer. If the x86 platform and
Linux now has the capacity to produce this type of
results, where does this leave Power
> On 06/ 1/10 11:59 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> > I just read AMD opterons and Linux is powering the
> worlds fastest supercomputer. If the x86 platform and
> Linux now has the capacity to produce this type of
> results, where does this leave Power and SPARC
> platfroms?
> >
> http://www.market
+--
| On 2010-06-02 16:13:13, Andrew Greimann wrote:
|
| When I "ls /dev" from the terminal, I get a zillion lines. I'm aware from
reading a post or two Solaris works with "drive slices" but what in the world
is a drive
> Hi,
>
> I. The
> Linux market on the other hand is becoming very over
> loaded with folks and servers. What that means at the
> end of the day is lower profit margins for vendors
> and lower wages for workers.
Seems like times have changed. Linux professionals are currently in high demand
and
41 matches
Mail list logo