>And thx for the answer - I thought the Cokin filters were made of glass,
>not plastic...
AFAIK, retangular Cokins are resin while rounded Cokins are glass.
>I like the flexibility the Cokin system provides... You know, the only
>thing to be worried about is the correct adapter, which is cheap
thanks George, thats great news!
finally a K prime *and* a metal hood... ah...
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Sorry guys, I have added one more item to the list. Don't hestitate to email
me any questions.
Pentax Quick Shoe Set - 1226001455
Pentax Battery Pack A for Motor Drive A - 1225153454
Pentax Battery Cord A - 1225156753
Pentax FD-2 Eyepiece for LX -
>I already own the A50 1.7.
>Is the 1.4 better optically? What's a reasonable price for it?
The A50/1.7 is significantly sharper at wide open, but the A50/1.4 is much
better built.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get Your Private, F
I seem to have built a stable consisting of the M50/2, the M50/1.4, the
A50/1.7 and A50/1.4. I'm anxious to perform my own tests as soon as I
can find the time. I fondly my SMCT50/1.4 was a splendid optic.
Steve S.
--
http://people.mn.mediaone.net/sscott2
Takehiko Ueda wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
>
Thanks Kevin. I actually had noticed the fold-over onto the second line and
had tried to rebuild the link, but had no luck.
I like your "off center" shot. If I were there I would probably do one
series (lens/f-stop combinations) centered, one series where you have it.
And then I would go lower, b
From: "Daphne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> anyone knows is the clamp-on tak 24/3.5 hood (its 60mm diameter) will
> work on the SMC 24/3.5-K (58mm diameter)? I have the lens on its way and
> am wondering should I grab the hood, I havent seen many of these around
> (but then I havent looked for one befor
How do you know one of us didn't get it? ;-)
Seriously though, does it really matter who gets it as long as SOMEONE
gets a deal on it? A KX moterdrive selling at a reasonable price is
much better for one of us when we want to get one, rather than a KX that
goes for an 'unreasonable' reserve ju
Ann Sanfedel wrote:
"I could see em loud and clear - who is the Carrie fisher look alike ? :)
annsan"
Ann, I've never been told that I look like Carrie Fisher before! I don't
mind, but I can't say that she'd be too flattered as they are probably the
worst I have ever looked in a shot! Did you
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1225858889
>
> Should I have bid the $10 opening and put the item in play for the rest of
> the pdml to follow-up on? Any thoughts?
Personally, I wouldn't, but it's up to you. Putting in a b
Hi Jeff,
I don't know which is better optically, for I didn't "test"
them. It's just my impression that A50/1.4 renders colours
more vividly than A50/1.7.
In Japan, A50/1.4 costs around JPY20,000 which makes around
USD160 due to weaker Yen... :( I think in the US it's
around USD100 to 150. I
On 28 Mar 2001, at 23:16, Mark Cassino wrote:
> The only issue that I have run into is that at times the teleconverters
> wreak havoc on the Bokeh. It's weird, but sometimes I get beautiful
> bokehs, sometimes I get odd bokehs were there is destinct details in the
> background (even though th
So here is my dilemma for you. I saw this just before I left work.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1225858889
It was a KX motordrive with a $10 opening bid, but a 'Buy-it-Now' price of
$90.
I marked it and then went home. I knew it wouldn't last long. I don't know
who
Kelvin,
Thanks for the information. I didn't know it is a preset lens.
Bob
> No. Not even today (it's still made). Best to go for a post 1989 Jupiter
> 85/2, as these
> are multicoated (though not as strudy as the earlier ones).
>
> Anyhow, doesn't make a difference... because you can always
I bought the 400 f2.8 with the intent to generally use it
with teleconverters. In controlled tests, the sharpness of the lens, even
with the 2x-L teleconverter, is phenominal.
The only issue that I have run into is that at times the teleconverters
wreak havoc on the Bokeh. It's weird, but someti
No. Not even today (it's still made). Best to go for a post 1989 Jupiter
85/2, as these
are multicoated (though not as strudy as the earlier ones).
Anyhow, doesn't make a difference... because you can always buy the M42-K
adaptor
and have it permanently mounted onto it. And, since the lens is pre
I already own the A50 1.7.
Is the 1.4 better optically? What's a reasonable price for it?
TIA, Jeff
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
Yep, love mine...in normal K mount of course.
Just bought the Manfrotto heavy gimbal lens support
for it. (Art.# 393)
Need something like that to steady the thing...it weighs
10lbs.
-Original Message-
From: Todd Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 29 March 2001 14:02
To:
Just to let you guys know that I have these items on eBay until the end of
this week. Don't hestitate to ask me any questions.
Pentax Battery Pack A for Motor Drive A - 1225153454
Pentax Battery Cord A - 1225156753
Pentax FD-2 Eyepiece for LX - 1225159636
Pentax FD-
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Robert Meier wrote:
> Does anyone know if the Jupiter 9 (85mm f2) lens has ever been
> available in K mount?
I don't think it is. Nobody here mentioned a K mount when I asked
about the lens, and all the research about it I've done in the web
shows only M42 versions.
j
--
-
Rapture wrote:
>
> interesting... ...and whats your email?
Huh???
What's your name?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Speaking of filters, I've just ordered a screw on Nikon Softar #1 diffusion
filter in 62mm.
I aim to use it with a step ring for my Pentax FA 100 f2.8 macro for portraiture.
The cost was horrendous, NZ $390.00, but the effect from this filter is
just fabulous.
God knows what it is that Nikon do
On Wed, 28 Mar
2001 07:55:30 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"I'm AMAZED at
the total lack of commentary on the arrival of the NEW flagship MZ-S body.
Is this an Apple Fool's joke played on me or is there a flagship. For 2
years I've waited and now noone speaks of it. When, where? We all kno
anyone knows is the clamp-on tak 24/3.5 hood (its 60mm diameter) will
work on the SMC 24/3.5-K (58mm diameter)? I have the lens on its way and
am wondering should I grab the hood, I havent seen many of these around
(but then I havent looked for one before, either) ?
Thanks for your imput!
Daphne
Cameron wrote:
> I just hope they do it SOON! They have been lagging badly behind all others
> in pro camera development;
There's no word about time frame so release date is pure speculation. I personally
doubt any other pro grade camera will be shown this year. As we have heard before
there
Jan van Wijk wrote:
> BTW: I recently saw a A* 400mm 2.8 for sale for about $3200 but that
> is a real heavy beast to lug arround ...
KEH in Atlanta (http://www.keh.com) has one left in "ex" condition.
Price has been dropping since last August from USD$3100 to $2899
as of this week. They also
Where there any cows in the area?
Skip
Subject: OT: They ARE out to get me
> OK. That does it.
>
> I got a 5 gallon propane bottle filled at a hardware store last night on
my
> way home from work. Anyway, I went inside to pay and came out 5 minutes
> later. I was parked just next to the prop
I just unloaded my Cokin Creative Filter set on eBay. Bought it 20 years ago, used
them maybe twice. I generally use a glass UV or Skylight on my lenses 100% - unless
using a PL.
Regards,
Steve S.
--
http://people.mn.mediaone.net/sscott2
"David A. Mann" wrote:
> Artur Led¢chowski writes:
>
>
I don't speak or read japanese, but I guess it's the
digital EI3000 (revamped EI2000) that has a zoom lens
34-107.
Herbet.
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a pain to point people to specific pages within
> the Pentax
> web site because they use frames (all together now:
> "FRAME
I just hope they do it SOON! They have been lagging badly behind all others
in pro camera development; I guess they just wanted to clean up in the point
and shoot market, not to mention binoculars and so on (BTW, have you ever
compared the milky, cloudy looking M.. binos with the clear. warm l
Hi Dick,
Mike is right. It's about the new digital camera called
El-3000. FYI, the translation is as follows;
Name: El-3000(tentative)
Type: Built-in zoom lens full automatic SLR type digital
still camera
Photo CCD: 3.43 million frame transfer 2/3 CCD
Lens: 3x zoom 34-107mm equivalent in 35mm
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:36:27 -0600, dick graham wrote:
>If one goes to the Mother Ship web site in Japan and clicks on the second
>line down under What's New and scroll down one will see a new product
>listed amongst the empty blocks: 35mm 34-107 mm. I'm aware of the 28-105
>newbie but have
It's a pain to point people to specific pages within the Pentax
web site because they use frames (all together now: "FRAMES
SUCK!"), but with a bit of digging I have found that the URL is
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2001/200112.html
IE gives me Japanese characters from which I can tell not
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:53:15 +0200, Frank Wajer wrote:
>has anyone tested the Pentax (F)A* 300mm f2.8 with the Pentax
>teleconverters.
>
Yes, I have been using the A* 300mm 2.8, in itself a superb lens!
Combined with the 1.4x L converter (the gray one with a "snout") it is
still very good, no v
>the Abbey connection would have pleased me
Is that Edward Albee, the playwright, you're talking about?
-- http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $8.99/mo! --
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Just go to:www.pentax.co.jp/japan/index.html and scrolldown. It is down
about 3 paragraphs and is in small print.
DG
At 03:23 AM 3/29/01 +0900, you wrote:
>Hi Dick,
>
> > If one goes to the Mother Ship web site in Japan and
> > clicks on the second line down under What's New and
> > scroll d
Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Anyone know if they protect film against radiation on the shuttle missions?
> (probably gone all digital now).
They probably haven't - NASA is practically the last place to move away
from a tried-and-true technology; they typically run many years behind
the curve (look at
www.pentax.co.jp/japan/index.html
At 08:14 PM 3/28/01 +0200, you wrote:
>Dick wrote:
>
> > If one goes to the Mother Ship web site in Japan and clicks on the second
> > line down under What's New and scroll down one will see a new product
> > listed amongst the empty blocks: 35mm 34-107 mm.
Thanks Pal, I appreciate the information!
DG
At 08:10 PM 3/28/01 +0200, you wrote:
>Dick wrote:
> > I got in on this late. Is it my understanding that there are photos of
> > these prototype bodies or is this just taken from talk at the camera show
> > in Japan? How serious is it?
>
>It's se
At 11:36 AM 3/28/01 -0600, you wrote:
>If one goes to the Mother Ship web site in Japan and clicks on the second
>line down under What's New and scroll down one will see a new product
>listed amongst the empty blocks: 35mm 34-107 mm. I'm aware of the 28-105
>newbie but have not heard of this
Scotland or Oz?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kelvin
> Sent: 28 March 2001 05:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: shops in perth
>
>
> hi
>
> I will be in Perth sometime late next month for a few days and
> was wondering
> wh
I regularly use a Cokin polarising filter to get some detail into the dreary
grey skies we regularly have in the UK.
I also occasionally use screw on No1 close up on a 50mm just to give a
little extra near focus.
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hi Dick,
> If one goes to the Mother Ship web site in Japan and
> clicks on the second line down under What's New and
> scroll down one will see a new product listed amongst
> the empty blocks: 35mm 34-107 mm. I'm aware of the
> 28-105 newbie but have not heard of this one. As it is
> impossib
>Dan Scott wrote:
snip
> The upside is that WalMart doesn't charge for prints you don't like, even
if it is > the whole roll.
snip
Really? Cant see that happening this side of the pond.
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Well make me an idiot Ann! It didn't even occur to me. I can't believe it.
Shoot shoot shoot!
Sorry about your picture. I'm sure it was good. Sometime within the last
year (I think) OP columnist Dewitt Jones had a column with a picture from
Dead Horse point at sunset.It was instantly reco
John Francis wrote:
>
> Ernest Alejandria wrote:
> >
> In my opinion, the only logical upgrade/succesor to the Z-1p/PZ-1p line will
> > be titanium clad with a multi-point AF and OTF metering. They can leave the
> > rest of the features intact, as far as I'm concerned.
>
> I don't care if it's
Ernest Alejandria wrote:
>
In my opinion, the only logical upgrade/succesor to the Z-1p/PZ-1p line will
> be titanium clad with a multi-point AF and OTF metering. They can leave the
> rest of the features intact, as far as I'm concerned.
I don't care if it's titanium clad or not (actually I'd p
If one goes to the Mother Ship web site in Japan and clicks on the second
line down under What's New and scroll down one will see a new product
listed amongst the empty blocks: 35mm 34-107 mm. I'm aware of the 28-105
newbie but have not heard of this one. As it is impossible for us American
OK. That does it.
I got a 5 gallon propane bottle filled at a hardware store last night on my
way home from work. Anyway, I went inside to pay and came out 5 minutes
later. I was parked just next to the propane tank. I opened the door on the
Montero and smelled a strong gas smell, thinking it
Wow Bill, I bet you have to wear a hearing aid in your right ear now, if
you know what I mean.
I've noticed since moving, and having 3 miles of dirt road I am going deaf
in that ear.
Tom C.
William Robb wrote:
> We were on our way back towards Moab from Dead Horse...
> I also figured there
Didn't receive confirmation message
Paul M. Provencher
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: PUG Confirmations
I have just sent out the confirmations for the upcoming Gallery.
If you think yo
Frank Wajer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> has anyone tested the Pentax (F)A* 300mm f2.8 with the Pentax
> teleconverters.
>
> I'm looking for the best telelens investment, filling the 300-600mm focal
> range.
> This lens plus teleconverters would give me:
>
> 300mm f2.8
> 420mm f4
> 600mm f5.6
>
> The 3
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute"
Subject: Re: Beating a Dead Hors...er, Cow
> Wow Bill, I bet you have to wear a hearing aid in your right
ear now, if
> you know what I mean.
>
> I've noticed since moving, and having 3 miles of dirt road I
am going deaf
> in that ear.
Nah, I w
My old uncle in Latin America sent me the above URL. I've not had a
chance to explore the site yet, but a quick glance indicates that
there's enough information there that at least some people should
find something useful. Have fun!
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no rules
In the magazine itself it is "Cote d`amour" - meaning how much they love the lens.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PRO
Maybe my 1.7/50 M is not a good sample but my 3.5/35-105 is sharper at 50 mm and it is
shaper than my 4/28-70 AL. The new 3.5-4.5/24-90 mm seems the same, sharpness-wise.
The weight actually helps dampen vibration, so I use it with ME and winder ME II.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography ho
I got in on this late. Is it my understanding that there are photos of
these prototype bodies or is this just taken from talk at the camera show
in Japan? How serious is it?
DG
At 12:33 PM 3/28/01 +0200, you wrote:
>Alin wrote:
>
> > To me, the two new MZ cameras appear to be rather an u
aimcompute wrote:
> Going off on a tangent again... The dead horse reminded me of Dead Horse
> Canyon State Park in Utah where we visited two years ago. Very picturesque
> and Grand Canyon-like. It's adjacent to Canyon Lands National Park. We had
> Kit Fox pups right in our camp site. And beli
I agree. You might see if you can find one used -- I bought mine a couple of
years ago for less than $100, and it also had the 7 and 15 degree spot
attachment. I've been very pleased with it.
Albano said:
> Check out Gossen too. They are great tools.
>
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Di
Boz,
Cool. Good update. I have no problems seeing the pages on my browser. I
like the comments on the pages for the M40/2.8 and the FA43/1.9. In my
case this makes the difference. I do not envy you the work.
The resolution test numbers are great, but the difference between the two
(Fred and
Hi,
has anyone tested the Pentax (F)A* 300mm f2.8 with the Pentax
teleconverters.
I'm looking for the best telelens investment, filling the 300-600mm focal
range.
This lens plus teleconverters would give me:
300mm f2.8
420mm f4
600mm f5.6
The 300 f4 lens gives 600 f8, which is a bit slow.
Any
Hi,
I'd like to hear(read) your opinion about Hoya and Tiffen filters, because I'm going
to buy some. Any advantages/disadvantages to which I should pay attention to?
Fox
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Do
It allows use of K-mount lenses on some video equipment.
Which equipment I don't know.
Collin
***
Data Processing Consultation, Inc.
Providing Broad-Spectrum Business Solutions and Assistance
http://www.iol21.com/dpconsult
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:48:00 -0600, Kevin Thornsberry wrote:
>
>I haven't developed anything yet but here's a link to a picture I took of the
>plantation a couple of years ago:
Sorry Kevin, link doesn't work ...
(Message about "you're not the owner, log on")
Regards, JvW
-
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:26:36 -0600, John Mustarde wrote:
>
>Perhaps looking at the brochure will be helpful. These scans are
>available for a limited time at:
>
>http://web2.airmail.net/linnm3/march/screens.html
Thanks John, much appreciated!
http://www.photographyreview.com/reviews/35mm_zoom_lenses/product_6285.asp
With regards to Vivitar, their 'pro' lens range are the
series 1. These lenses are good performers and overall
are considerably better than the Sigma offerings when
built quality and so forth is taken in to account.
Havi
At 10:29 PM 3/27/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>No,no,no.
>You misunderstand. I love all races as I love my own.
>Other cultures are wonderful and make the world a much
>better place. I am a white girl anyway, not a white
>boy. My flatmates are Chinese and Taiwanese, one of my
>best friends is Chinese, a
Peter Smith wrote:
> For those of us without the knowledge - What's a Swiss arca style plate ???
Kirk and others make ballheads that have a dovetail shaped quick release head
that is modeled after the Arca Swiss ball head which is a kinda standard. There
is a generic plate that comes with the he
At 06:44 PM 3/28/2001 +1000, you wrote:
Could someone please enlighten me as to what a
"FG grip" is? Thanks to all
of you "in the know". :-)
Tanya.
http://www.pentax.com/products/accessories/accessory.cfm?accessoryType=SLR
AA - Battery Pack FG (Powers all ZX cameras)
Description: Takes 4 AA b
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Bob Blakely wrote:
> Cokin filters suck canal water. Compared to even a cheap, screw in glass filter,
>they are
> sharpness reducing, contrast destroying, dispersion generating flair intensifiers.
Flair intensifying? So all the glamour photographers use Cokin, then?
--
Dave,
You _really_ need to get out and play with your new 43mm. And that 6x7 out
for a joy ride, too!
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sorry, I'm not much help but I might make you feel better with my own
>misery :) I've shot about four rolls since mid-January, and most of that was
>on one day.
Hi again,
Well, I have been offered the following lens for au$195.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=191726&size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=191724&size=lg
Could you guys offer me some advice as to whether or not this would be a
good buy (I can't a
Stan,
Thanks for trying. It looks to me like somewhere along the way the link was split
into two lines. Grrr!
Connect the line beginning with ID=632... with the http: line and you should get in.
As an alternative, I probably should have given you this link which is shorter.
http://commu
Congratulations on your 40th, Ken. I suspect you won't have any problems
remembering it.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Dan, I experienced the same weather this weekend only two hours north at Lake
>Buchanan. My wife and I drove up to the lake Friday afternoon, got a cabin,
>put the bass boat in
>
> "Robertson, Alastair" wrote:
>
> > does anyone know whether Kirk or somebody else makes a Swiss arca style
> > plate for the super program. Their website says that they make
> one for MX/LX
> > and another for PZ-1p
> >
For those of us without the knowledge - What's a Swiss arca style pla
There was a recent TV documentary about the quest to send a manned flight to
Mars. The astronaut once outside the Earths atmosphere is unprotected from
Solar and other stellar radiation so the time exposed is a big issue.
Experienced astronauts talked about "seeing" radiation flashes probably
cau
Hi Everyone,
You know my friend with all the Pentax Gear for sale? Well he has what he
calls "Video Pentax K Mount Lens Adaptor" and is asking if any of you
wonderful people would happen to know what kind of video it suits. He
doesn't speak English that great, so I don't know if what he calls i
Alin wrote:
> Very likely a Canon clone, with a simplified user interface via a
> left mode dial and the new Safox VII autofocus system. Feature
> crammed, direct opponent of EOS-3 and Dynax-7 and aiming to the PZ
> owners.
I guess this S-1 is camera that went back to engineering for an upgra
At 12:31 28.3.2001 +0200, Pål wrote:
>Olivier wrote:
>
>> Pentax-A 24mm f/2.8 Performances : 3
>> Pentax-A 35mm f/2.8 Performances : 3
>> Pentax-A* 85mm f/1.4 Performances : 3
>> Pentax-A* 135mm f/1.8 Performances : 3
>> Pentax-A* 300mm f/2.8 ED-IF Performances : 3
>
>
>I
Olivier wrote:
> Pentax-A 24mm f/2.8 Performances : 3
> Pentax-A 35mm f/2.8 Performances : 3
> Pentax-A* 85mm f/1.4 Performances : 3
> Pentax-A* 135mm f/1.8 Performances : 3
> Pentax-A* 300mm f/2.8 ED-IF Performances : 3
I belive this sort of drivel shouldn't even be po
Alin wrote:
> To me, the two new MZ cameras appear to be rather an updated MZ-3
> and a downgraded MZ-S. There is little sense in improving the MZ-7 -
> an already settled body in its class. But the MZ-3/5n cries for a new
> autofocus and a touch of the flash system.
I wasn't thinking about
From: "Ernest Alejandria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In my opinion, the only logical upgrade/succesor to the Z-1p/PZ-1p line will
> be titanium clad with a multi-point AF and OTF metering. They can leave the
> rest of the features intact, as far as I'm concerned.
Well, tha
> "Alin" == Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alin> Thanks Olivier, this one made it into my archive despite
Alin> the several discrepancies heavily criticized here on the
Alin> list. BTW, hope ChdI won't find out about your little
Alin> leak. If not for copyright re
This lens is a duffer.
According to the seller it's "protected against flair" so all
the photos taken with it will be really boring
mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pe
Thanks Olivier, this one made it into my archive despite the several
discrepancies heavily criticized here on the list.
BTW, hope ChdI won't find out about your little leak. If not for
copyright reasons, they swear squarely - as I noticed on their list.
Servus, Alin
Olivier wrote:
>
> "Yves" == Yves Caudano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yves> At 10:20 28/3/01 +0200, you wrote:
>> Cote = Chasseur d'Images cote (I don't know the translation)
>> Olivier.
Yves> Cote = rating
Merci.
Olivier.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscri
At 10:20 28/3/01 +0200, you wrote:
>Cote = Chasseur d'Images cote (I don't know the translation)
>Olivier.
Cote = rating
Yves
--
Dr. Yves Caudano
Laboratoire LASMOS
Département de Physique
Facultés Universitaires N
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:58:17 -0800, Alan Chan wrote:
"I think it has so much to do with the size and shape of the body rather
than
the weight when talking about balance. For instances, the MZ-M is too small
for the A70-210/4, but handles a lot better with the FG grip. I even feel
the MZ-M with th
On 27 Mar 2001, at 20:05, Jan van Wijk wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:25:54 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> >
> >Not quite, the SE-60 behaves more like a SE-25 and the SG-60 has an
> >etched grid patern like the SE-20 but has optical characteristics like the SE-
> >25/SE-60.
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> I
on 3/27/01 9:48 PM, Kevin Thornsberry at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
">
http://community.webshots.com/scripts/editPhotos.fcgi?action=showMyPhoto&alb
um
> ID=6322637&photoID=5503882&security=XGrdUTYjyO
I get the following:
- --
Webshots Community Error
A problem has been dete
I have been assured my bike is covered under contents
even away from home. I had a very nice (expensive,
brand-new) bike stolen before I got insurance just
after leaving home, so I made sure of this fact. So I
assume the camera is same.
Jody.
__
Do
Hi,
it's about where the centre of gravity falls. Some people prefer it to
fall towards the camera end whereas others seem to prefer it at the
lens front end. If you're a camera-ender, like me, and used to older
heavier cameras and lenses such as an LX+winder, then it can be quite
disconcerting t
I had to look to the RFc-822 complete headers to make sure it's not
one of the Valentin's famous cave projections. Come on Pål, you used
to let it out gradually, how can you throw it all in one volley and
expect to be followed!? ;o)
Comments below.
Pål wrote:
PJ> Its interesting to note the
> "herbet" == herbet brasileiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
herbet> It's quite a bargain for around US$10. I wonder how many
herbet> lens tests are included. Herbet.
In my version, the lens tested are :
Pentax-A 24mm f/2.8Performances : 3Rapport qualite/prix : 3
And chicken fat for thickshakes? Actually I think that
might be true :)
> Anyone remember the old urban legend that McDonalds
> used used
> *worms* instead of beef (or at least as a
> supplement; urban
> legends usually aren't clear on these finer points)?
_
>I have just seen this used lens for sale at a local camera shop.
>It has an adaptall KA mount and is going for $799.00.
>It's quite rare in my country, and seems an ideal portrait lens.
>It's nice and compact and seems in excellent order.
>
>Who's got one, and shall I buy it?
Don't know about th
96 matches
Mail list logo
