Hi,
I have a Pentax dedicated vivitar flash with TTL capabilities. Does the Z-1P
allow TTL with K and M series lenses? I tried a quick test last night with a
K 35/3.5 and would get the green auto exposure OK light on the flash to come
on only up to F 5.6 even though I was 6 ft away from the
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Butch Black wrote:
A friend of mine gave me some MF and LF scans done on an Epson 2450. The
files were 20-30MB PSD files (Photoshop) I was amazed at the quality. It's
still not ideal for 35mm although it may compare favorably with the S20.
All this talk finally inspired me
It's always problematic to test TTL flash with no film in the camera.
Since the sensor is measuring light reflected off the film, it's
measuring what would seem to be a reduced amount of light reflecting
off the black pressure plate instead.
I don't think there's any problem using TTL flash
Joe Wilensky wrote:
It's always problematic to test TTL flash with no film in the camera.
Since the sensor is measuring light reflected off the film, it's
measuring what would seem to be a reduced amount of light reflecting
off the black pressure plate instead.
I may be wrong but I do not
TTL is done through off-the-film metering, albeit as a separate
system from the Z-1p (and the Z1, SF1/SF1n, Super Program) camera's
regular light metering system. The LX is the only Pentax camera to
incorporate both TTL metering as well as off-the-film light metering
at the time of exposure
Gary L. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be wrong but I do not recall the Pz-1p having OTF metering
That's totally different from TTL
TTL metering is done off the film. There's a sensor in the mirror box
that points back toward the film plane (on the PZ-1p it's on the right
side of
IMHO the advances in TTL metering are attempts to become as good as quality
hand-held meters. It's also MHO that multi segment metering calculates an
xposure that is correct most of the time but not every time, and the
photographer isn't likely to know just what skew the meter's interpretive
Mark Roberts wrote:
TTL metering is done off the film. There's a sensor in the mirror box
that points back toward the film plane (on the PZ-1p it's on the right
side of the mirror box as you look in without a lens mounted).
Brain fart. :-)
Later,
Gary
The incorrect copyright date at the bottom of the letter is another
proof that it is not quite right . . .
Alan Abbott wrote:
The 'Login button does NOT go to Paypal but:
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/boyz.php.
Alan
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Its that time again for the false Paypal emails!
I get false ebay emails as well. They usually ask for credit card
numbers, name and address. I just discard them. Thanks for the
warning.
I got one of those on my hotmail account,
- Original Message -
From: Paul
Subject: Re: First 6x7 lessons learned
Pentax 6x7 f22 @ 1/30th. Hand held of course.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1069827
Nice panning technique.
Yer very good.
William Robb
I may be bigger than you as well, which would make the camera a bit
harder to operate cleanly. I have also, so far, eschewed the new style
smaller spectacles in favour of my older semi aviation style frames.
I think it will do well in the market segment it is aimed at though.
I don't see the lack
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: New Scanner
Could you guys please try a 4X5 tranny scan at max resolution
( which I assume is 3200 ppi) and report the scan time
to me? With the 2450 (2400 ppi) it takes about 20 minutes
which is quite annoying
John,
- Original Message -
From: James Fellows
Subject: Re: *ist
How does it's feel or construction compare to the ZX/MZ series?
For me, about the same, based on a very short look at the camera, mostly
spent fumbling the (in my opinion only) too small control interface. My
reference is the
- Original Message -
Subject: Re:[2] First 6x7 lessons learned
I tried photographing a moving steam locomotive once. The slow
shutter
time caused the wheels to look out of round.
It takes the 6x7 shutter 1/30 of a second to transverse the entire
frame, so fast action shots are
Is the negative in contact with glass at all when doing a transparency
scan on the 2450? If so, any issues w/ newton rings, and keeping the
glass clean?
-Mat
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Could you guys please try a 4X5 tranny scan at max resolution
( which I assume is 3200 ppi) and report the scan
- Original Message -Penned by WW
Subject: Re:[2] First 6x7 lessons learned
Paul seems to have a good workaround (panning), and I don't really know
if the slow shutter speed will be an issue with what you are doing.
It doesn't matter what
Daniel Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist in stock
From: Daniel Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:18:20 -0800
What on earth is wrong with silver?
Wed, 31 Dec 1969???
;-)
Let's do the time warp again
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation
Hey Butch,
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist in stock
From: Daniel Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:18:20 -0800
What on earth is wrong with silver?
Wed, 31 Dec 1969???
;-)
Let's do the time warp again
Looks like a Mac user with the date reset problem! :-)
- THaller
Is the negative in contact with glass at all
when
doing a transparency
scan on the 2450? If so, any issues w/ newton rings, and keeping the
glass clean?
-Mat
Mat.
The 2450,and i assume the 3200, have plastic holders for 35mm,120,mounted slides
My new 3200 is used with a PC with 800Mz processor, 382Mb RAM and USB 2.0.
I just scanned a 6x6 tranny at 3200 and the times were; 2:31 for scanning,
0:27 for processing for a total time of 2:58.
The film is not in contact with the scanner glass at any time.
Bill
- Original Message -
I wanted to do some sharpness tests on my Tokina and Arsat lenses (see
lens list below). While I was at it, I decided to compare some other
lenses as well. Some of the results are interesting enough to share.
Here's what I did: Subject is the front of the old (1870) church in
Corrales, New
Mail-Archive.com is back up today, after its latest protracted vacation.
It appears that all messages between April 6 and June 5 have been lost.
This means that I don't know the reaction (flames??) to my complaint
about the 2004 PUG themes.
Can anyone summarize the list's reaction for me? Will
Wouldn't this be the correct way to print/display the digital image
before starting to do comparisons with film ? If you process it with
interpolation and god knows what other algorithms, then how can you jump
out the gun with conclusions like digital is smoother and has less
grain etc. If I
you weren't able to account for sample to sample variation, which may be larger than
the differences you saw. that's the trouble with these. very few people have the
access to the number of different samples of the same lens, let alone have the
inclination and patience to do the tests.
Herb...
Alan Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'Login button does NOT go to Paypal but:
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/boyz.php.
Just for future reference: In web URL's, anything to the LEFT of an @
(but after the http://;) is ignored by the browser. So the above URL is
simply
Mark Roberts a écrit:
...
TTL metering is done off the film. There's a sensor in the mirror box
that points back toward the film plane (on the PZ-1p it's on the right
side of the mirror box as you look in without a lens mounted).
Yes, and on the MZ-S the sensor is under the mirror, before the AF
Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mail-Archive.com is back up today, after its latest protracted vacation.
It appears that all messages between April 6 and June 5 have been lost.
This means that I don't know the reaction (flames??) to my complaint
about the 2004 PUG themes.
Can anyone
if the end image is the same, what is the point? if one image is better, does it
matter how?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:04
Subject: Re: OT: Bayer image example
Wouldn't this be the correct way
Herb Chong wrote:
if one image is better, does it matter how?
Yes it does, it's a question of comparison/test methods.
cheers,
caveman
Sam Spade is a very good site. Thanks, Mark.
I've put it in my easily reached place of honor, in the menu bar!
keith whaley
Mark Roberts wrote:
Alan Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'Login button does NOT go to Paypal but:
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/boyz.php.
Just for future
Gary L. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
TTL metering is done off the film. There's a sensor in the mirror box
that points back toward the film plane (on the PZ-1p it's on the right
side of the mirror box as you look in without a lens mounted).
Brain fart. :-)
Hey, for
Very interesting...
Now, when they say a digicam is 6 megapixel, do they mean 6 million
blue-green-green-red pixels (24 million sensor pixels), or do they mean 1.5
million blue-green-green-red pixels (6 million sensor pixels)?
Now, on the Foveon, when they say 3 megapixels, do they mean 3
Uytkownik Nick Zentena [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
But that\'s not an open aperture M42 lens I don\'t think. Don\'t you have to
meter stopped down?
Nope, you're right. It's a stopped down aperture lens - I missed the word open.
OTOH, how can one use automatic diaphragm of an m42 lens on any
What about... get a polarazing filter, place it on the scanner, put the diamond on it
and
scan at a high res. No camera needed.
I just did this with a cloisonne ladybug pin I listed on ebay.. It did pretty well,
and I actually didnt
do it at high res.
I barely have time to glance at the list
You are correct about the carrier holding the neg above the glass.
Depending on the size of the negative, you can get some sag in the
middle. I am scanning 67 negs and find that strips do better than
single negs because the strip helps hold the neg more evenly. I would
guess that 4X5 would have
Uytkownik Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
IMHO the advances in TTL metering are attempts to become as good as quality
hand-held meters.
Of course
It\'s also MHO that multi segment metering calculates an
xposure that is correct most of the time but not every time, and the
photographer
My extensive tests on the Tokina 28-80 confirm similar findings.very
sharp thru the entire range, often as good or better than fixed lenses.
Robert James
In a message dated 6/5/03 9:13:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The Tokina 28-80 is clearly a winner.
- Prime lenses do not
all digital camera specs except for the Foveon based ones count individual sensing
elements as a pixel. it carries almost all of the same detail information as if they
were pure luminance sensors. the eye is pretty insensitive to color detail and there
are many, many experiments that verify
Yes it was to you Dave :D
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring a few 35mm slides over, we can
compare.
Not sure Brendan,was this directed at moi,or some
one else.If its moi i have a few i can
bring over.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not pertinent.
It's pertinent for me.
When the test being performed has the resolution of the
projector lens,
good or bad, as a common factor, so long as you don't
change the lens
between tests, it can be ignored,
If you're in the US and can stomach Wall Mart Eveready 357, 1/2 the price
of the MS76
and still Silver oxide.
At 01:30 PM 6/2/03 -0700, you wrote:
Hmm, A76? Wouldn't that be an alkaline? Wouldn't that have the dreaded
slow voltage drop discharge characteristic? I would have thought (from what
I
If I am correct, the TTL flash metering of Z-1p can do centre-weighted only
(unlike Nikon where you can choose whatever metering you liked for TTL
flash), similar to Super A/Program. The TTL flash sensor is located on the
side of the mirror box. However, I could be wrong. The manual doesn't
Hello Peter!
If you're in the US and can stomach Wall Mart Eveready
357, 1/2 the price of the MS76 and still Silver oxide.
Thanks Peter, that sounds useful! Still 1.5V each and the proper size I
imagine, or you wouldn't be recommending them, I presume...
What was the store you mentioned,
I've put it on another, more appropriate list :-)
Maris
Peter Alling wrote:
I'd love to see the methodology. (And yes I'm sure Frank will see a
dirty joke here as well, just to combine another thread).
At 04:19 AM 6/3/03 -0500, you wrote:
I have studied this matter thoroughly while
From the tests it out resolves the D60, but the real
problem is that it produces small file sizes. DPreview
said that ressing up a bit you can get sharper prints
with more detail than most 5 mp cams, I believe them
but untill they can pull a 6 mp chip out of the rabbit
hat a 6 mp cam will still
tom wrote:
If his point was that digital projection is inferior, fine, I don't
think anyone would argue that an XGA resolution projector is going to
beat any slide projector.
You got it right. The cave thing was that before starting any kind of X
vs. Y comparison, you have to define the purpose
A question for you screwmount guys. What do you think about the
Super Takumar 1:1.9/85? I have an opportunity to buy one and
wonder if and how much I should pay for it. Is it worth the hassle
to use it on a K-mount?
It's not the best 85mm lens there is, but if the price is right...
The bokeh
Mark Roberts wrote:
Hey, for years I didn't know how TTL flash worked at all. I posted some
questions on rec.photo.equipment.35mm and got several detailed
answers... *all* of which covered everything *except* the fact that the
camera is metering off the film during the exposure! And, of course,
Thanks to a good Pentax contact and to a very kind invitation I was
today able to inspect a pre-production *ist D which has just arrived in
Germany. This pre-productioncamera body is believed to be not a
prototype anymore but equivalent to the final model except for some last
software
Fred wrote:
I do have some comparative 85mm shots (including the Super Takumar
85/1.9) at -
http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/85compar/
Even being one of the old f**ts that know those images for quite a
while, I still can't refrain to LOL each time when I get to view the
85/2.2 Soft one in the
-Original Message-
From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You got it right. The cave thing was that before starting
any kind of X
vs. Y comparison, you have to define the purpose for which
you want to
use them, and please make it a valid one. The kind of
testing we see now
on
I wanted them to be the exact output of the respective cameras, without
further processing or compression artifacts. I somehow hoped that I will
see some differences, in the color rendition and local contrast dept.,
but no luck, the projector was a very good equalizer. No notable
differences
no, the holder keeps the 4X5 neg off the glass but I found that
thin negs sagged a little and did cause newton rings. I solved
the problem by taping 4 quarters to the bottom of the neg
holder to hold neg slightly higher off glass. Still get sharp
results as the scanners optical system has plenty
I must agree with everything Alin wrote. It was the MZ-5 (and 3 months
later the 5n) that finally tempted me away from my long-serving MX.
Four years later, the MZ-S seemed the ultimate expression of the 5n concept,
so I bought it and have been very happy with it.
The menu and control wheels
I think what you really want is Louisiana Stupid Sauce, at least that's
it's name. Pure Capsaicin with just enough vinegar to keep it liquid and
red die for coloring. Pure heat no flavor, (Unless you consider acetic acid
flavor).
At 10:25 AM 6/2/03 -0400, you wrote:
Rob
Wasabi eating contest.
Just got an e-mail from BH (in New York, NY) that the
*ist is in stock.
FYI.
Peter
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
A few things regarding the not so good news:
- In aperture priority mode, with a K-mount lens not in A position,
the camera chooses the shutter speed as if the lens was set at open
aperture. And really, the aperture stays open during exposure, no matter
what aperture is set on the lens, as
At 05:04 PM 6/5/03 -0400, you wrote:
I think what you really want is Louisiana Stupid Sauce, at least that's
^^
it's name. Pure Capsaicin with just enough vinegar to keep it liquid and
^
This should read ...at least that's
They better just put the simulator back in the camera
and make it work correctly, we would want DOF preview
AT ANY TIME like we are used to. That and metering AT
ANY TIME to.
--- Arnold Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to a good Pentax contact and to a very kind
invitation I was
today
What do you need, JCO to wander into this to know you're in the Twilight
Zone? You've got folks who have an agenda to prove something, and don't
care how they do it. So stop confusing things with facts.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... he went to some effort to use files from dslrs that are
Brendan wrote:
They better just put the simulator back in the camera
and make it work correctly, we would want DOF preview
AT ANY TIME like we are used to. That and metering AT
ANY TIME to.
C'mon Brendan. They are now closer to that great camera Nikon F80 and
you complain ?
cheers,
caveman
The should come out with smaller lenses for it, the one I saw looked
ridiculous on the Asterist.
William Robb
I have been trying a number of secondhand F FA lenses on the camera
basically to check the function of the lenses before the guarantees on
the individual lenses expire.
So far I
But, how is the metering system activated? Isn't it by pressing the shutter
button? And it stays on for 10 seconds.
Half pressing the shutter release button will activate the metering
system, LCD display etc, or alternatively you can press the AV button
adjacent to the shutter release
Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:04 PM 6/5/03 -0400, you wrote:
I think what you really want is Louisiana Stupid Sauce, at least that's
^^
it's name. Pure Capsaicin with just enough vinegar to keep it liquid and
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Spade is a very good site. Thanks, Mark.
I've put it in my easily reached place of honor, in the menu bar!
Samspade.org rocks! Try downloading their free software, though
(http://samspade.org/ssw/). Even better (and much faster) than the web
page.
--
...and this time I was ready and waiting for him...
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/photoessays/owl.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
On 03.6.5 5:33 PM, Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So stop confusing things with facts.
Here you go again.
Stop confusing things with something you know nothing about.
What is the point of you suddenly coming into this without anything useful
to contribute?
Be specific as others do,
I believe the point was humor.
-Original Message-
From: KT Takeshita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 6:13 PM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: Re: Digital vs. film cave test
On 03.6.5 5:33 PM, Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So stop confusing things with
Very nice, indeed.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:07 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: OT: He came back...
...and this time I was ready and waiting for him...
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/photoessays/owl.html
KT Takeshita wrote:
On 03.6.5 5:33 PM, Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
What is the point of you suddenly coming into this without anything useful
to contribute?
He's just trolling, as usual. Brucey, you're soo predictable Why
don't you make some effort to surprise me ?
Nice shots Cotty,
Looks like he heard the mirror going up on the first shot! :-)
- THaller
Yes, I was panning. I was shooting this car for an enthusiast magazine,
so I didn't mind burning some film. The profile pan is one of the
standard shots that I do on almost every car shoot. In this case, the
car was moving at about 30 mph. I had the driver go back and forth
following the same path
Thank you. I think a heavy camera and lens are actually an advantage
when panning. The momentum of the mass contributes to the smoothness of
the swing.
Paul
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul
Subject: Re: First 6x7 lessons learned
Pentax 6x7 f22 @ 1/30th. Hand
On 5 Jun 2003 at 13:07, T Rittenhouse wrote:
Very interesting...
Now, when they say a digicam is 6 megapixel, do they mean 6 million
blue-green-green-red pixels (24 million sensor pixels), or do they mean 1.5
million blue-green-green-red pixels (6 million sensor pixels)?
Indeed it is
Wow! Great shots. I'm going to save them.
Paul
Cotty wrote:
...and this time I was ready and waiting for him...
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/photoessays/owl.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
That should read:
Obviously though the majority of the lumimance component is derived from the
green channel given that there are 2 pixels for every one of red and blue.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ohhh dear, powerout resets the computer clock all the time, i need to
get a new battery, but i'm too lazy.
Still though, i personally like silver. Besides, a variety of colors is
probably more expensive for them to make. Apple had to nix the
multi-colored imacs partly because of poor sales on
On 5 Jun 2003 at 22:34, Arnold Stark wrote:
Let's hope (never stop hoping) that the compatibilty issue will be
bettered in a software update or in an updated *ist D or in the
successor of the *ist D - this could be one advatage of the short
production cycles of the digital age.
Thanks for
On June 5, 2003 07:08 pm, Daniel Liu wrote:
Oh, the days of metal cameras with fake leather are over, aren't they?
But i'm sure some brave soul will try painting theirs.
http://www.hartblei.com/products/cameras/trim-finish.htm
Now that's a company that believes in choice.
On June 5, 2003 01:11 pm, Artur Ledchowski wrote:
Nope, you're right. It's a stopped down aperture lens - I missed the word
open. OTOH, how can one use automatic diaphragm of an m42 lens on any
K-mount body? I haven't heard of any adapter that allows such operation. Is
there any? Regards
If you ask me, they're probably working on a more advanced version of
the *ist, something that more resembles the 5n. After all, why wouldn't
they? Seems like a lot (not all) of the problems you guys have
described can be solved with a software fix, like the metering with
older lenses.
On June 5, 2003 07:44 am, Herb Chong wrote:
oops, i meant filtering and interpolating.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 07:33
Subject: Re: OT: 2 articles from the washington post
it doesn't
On June 5, 2003 05:48 pm, Harold Owen wrote:
Pentax will have to release quality FAJ lenses for the *ist D rather
than the 'economy' type lenses supplied for the *ist SLR.
Why would the *ist digital need better lenses then the *ist film? I'm
guessing they're filtering the lenses on
Haha, that is pretty neat. Does anyone know how much one of those
things costs nowadays? Or where i can get one once i win the lottery?
--Daniel Liu
The face of a child can say it all,
especially the mouth part of the face.
On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 13:36
Awww, I thought that might be really something, but it's all Windows. Sighhh.
keith
Mark Roberts wrote:
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Spade is a very good site. Thanks, Mark.
I've put it in my easily reached place of honor, in the menu bar!
Samspade.org rocks! Try
That first shot is super.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: OT: He came back...
...and this time I was ready and waiting for him...
Those are beauties, Cotty! What a well-done task!
keith
Cotty wrote:
...and this time I was ready and waiting for him...
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/photoessays/owl.html
Cheers,
Cotty
CityTV showed one of it's Naked in the House episodes this week. It's an
invitation only competition. The photographer gets 30 minutes with a naked
model and one roll of film. I've yet to see a Nikon or a Canon. I've seen
Pentax,Mamiya,Hasselblad, lots of Texas Leicas, something that
I need to go for one of those walks. Been a long time. However, it would
take all summer to get back in shape to do it.
Enjoy yourself, Bob.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Those guys are the BIG boys from all over Canada and
the States, and Medium format only or larger, no dinky
35mm amateurs there.
--- Nick Zentena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CityTV showed one of it's Naked in the House
episodes this week. It's an
invitation only competition. The
Nick Zentena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On June 5, 2003 07:53 pm, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Of course you didn't. That's why you didn't understand that the
Valentin's original post was a spoof test. Projecting images with a
high resolution projector, then a low resolution projector and then
I see the lenses are on the US site.
Interestingly, all (as far as I have looked) smc is all lower case now.
Must be inferior to old SMC lenses. ;(
Collin
Oh thank you! I thought I'd had too much Glen Garioch! g
keith
Rob Studdert wrote:
That should read:
Obviously though the majority of the lumimance component is derived from the
green channel given that there are 2 pixels for every one of red and blue.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
I've just started sorting through my slides from last weekend at
Grandfather Mountain (and I just found one more roll that I have to get
processed tomorrow), but this one kinda stood out. It's from friday
night when I was camping out on Attic Window Peak. MZ-S, SMC-A 20/2.8,
Kodak E100SW, 2-stop
LMAO
--- collinb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see the
lenses are on the US site.
Interestingly, all (as far as I have looked) smc
is all lower case now.
Must be inferior to old SMC lenses. ;(
Collin
__
Post your free
Nick Zentena wrote:
Has
Pentax ever made a lens with lower resolution then any current digital
sensor can handle? The worst Pentax lens ever made likely exceeds the best
current digital sensor.
Don't underestimate digital. It's still in its infancy stage. In 5 years
we'll laugh at the
From: Peter Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *ist Position
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
Check the Pentax Canada website. They have the *ist
listed as a novice/intermediate SLR, which is the same
as the MZ-6 MZ-7. The MZ-5n is listed as
intermediate the MZ-S is listed as pro.
In
I think he gets everything that Tom dropped and sent back. Seriously
Alan, you do seem to be a magnet for problems. I have purchased 3
ZX-10's, 2 PZ-1p's, 2 MZ-S's, F17-28 fisheye, FA 20/2.8, FA *24/2, FA
28/2.8, FA 35/2, FA 50/1.7, FA *85/1.4, FA 100/2.8 macro, FA 135/2.8,
FA *200/2.8 and A
Alan,
I'm very inclined to agree with that. I suspect we could be seeing
the beginning of the end of Pre-A lenses. Fortunately for me, all my
lenses are A or newer.
Bruce
Friday, June 6, 2003, 12:04:40 AM, you wrote:
AC If an expensive model like *ist D doesn't support pre-A lenses, there
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
