On Oct 29, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the histogram also generated from the in-camera JPEG?
That would explain why shots that look as if they're clipping at the
white end on the camera's histogram come into RAW converters with
latitude
On Oct 29, 2005, at 4:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a side question. Anyone know if iphoto can display file names. I
asked Cotty, but he
does not use the program, so didi
not have an answer.
Either that or he was having supper when i emailed.:-)
Responding in the context of iPhoto
For a long time I have held that with
the instruction book and a little
patience anyone with an ounce of
intelligence can find out how to work a
machine or instrument. Too bad -- I now
have to abandon this premise.
After getting the card for the *ist D I
programmed custom 1 so that it
I geuss I have posted at least one of these photographs earlier.
Nevertheless, together I believe they make a nice little series.
What do uyou think?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/1244174/show/
Regards
Jens
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
I should add here that the camera works
perfectly with an external flash -- a
Vivitar 730AFPK. But with the internal
flash up the camera will not expose
although the flash symbol appears and
all seems well.
Don Williams wrote:
For a long time I have held that with the instruction book and
3. It is definitely possible that I messed up somehow on frame 18 -
that's why frame 19 has essentially the same shot.
I'll bet it was gross over-exposure.
I'm trying very hard to remember what exactly I did, but I', not sure if
I can. I must be getting old...
I'm thinking I
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was in manual
exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which were at least a stop and
a half too hot. What this tends to do apart from the obvious is turn the sky a
very icky turquoise colour, so rather than completely
Nice talking to you on Skype, Don. Very nice invention, isn't it?
The camera is faulty - RTF doesn't work right. Hoope you get it fixed fast.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30.
Thanks Boris.
On Oct 30, 2005, at 12:51 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
The title says it all.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3836659size=lg
LOL... I was fooled to expect to see some chimp-anzees...
Well done.
Boris
This URL brought up nothing, except an arrow back to the set. So I went
back and looked at the set. I like them. You might want to work a bit
on bringing out more shadow detail in the faces where they show. If
you're using PSCS, the Shadow/Highlight tool can accomplish that.
Paul
On Oct 30,
I've been over this again and it seems
the flash is indeed faulty. Its
something I don't need and its a pity
they don't make an *ist D version
without one. Lifting the flash will soon
run the batteries flat. I'm going to
avoid that until I can get a new camera.
Hope you get/got good
Excellent composition. The tonal values are nice here to my eye.
Paul
On Oct 30, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was in
manual exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which were at
least a stop and a half too hot.
P. J. Alling wrote:
There are many places in the world where waters are naturally
contaminated with Tannins which turn the water the color of tea. The
Mississippi isn't polluted because it's muddy...
I'd like to interject a few words about water pollution.
I think of pollution as
Hi Rob ...
BW seems like a good way to present this photo. Good choice. The subject
and location looks like it would offer a lot of possibilities, although I'm
not sure that you caught the best possibility with this shot. However,
the problem here is that the image is way too big to fit on my
Don Williams wrote:
For a long time I have held that with the instruction book and a little
patience anyone with an ounce of intelligence can find out how to work a
machine or instrument. Too bad -- I now have to abandon this premise.
After getting the card for the *ist D I programmed custom
Hi Don ... So sorry to hear that you've gotta return the camera. Been
there, done that - it's annoying at the least.
I'd love to see a Pentax DSLR without a pop up flash, and perhaps without a
number of other bells and whistles.
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original
I have now changed the contrast (suggested by Rob) by using the
shadow/highlight tool in CS:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/1244553/
I geuss all of you guys with flat screens may be seeing things with a little
more contrast, eh?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
Hi!
Hi Don ... So sorry to hear that you've gotta return the camera. Been
there, done that - it's annoying at the least.
I'd love to see a Pentax DSLR without a pop up flash, and perhaps without a
number of other bells and whistles.
Shel, I am with you on this one.
--
Boris
I thought I might post a proper picture now:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=children
Not necessarily among the best I've taken, but since we were discussing
picture-taking in the public, and using children as subjects in
particular, a while back... I have in fact photographed a number
On Oct 30, 2005, at 4:25 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was
in manual exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which
were at least a stop and a half too hot. What this tends to do
apart from the obvious is turn the sky a very
The file is HUGE ... perhaps in the future you can bring your posted pics
down to a reasonable size. Those on slow dialup connections have to wait a
l-o-n-g time to see the photo.
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Toralf Lund
I thought I might post
On Oct 29, 2005, at 1:47 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/57182627/
*istD, Kenlock Auto 135mm f2.8 screwmount at f2.8 1/1000 ISO3200
Very nice! I like the deep tones you've gotten here, excellent
composition.
Godfrey
On 30 Oct 2005 at 3:39, keith_w wrote:
I can't speak to the presence of other contaminants like tannins and
other water colorants, but I'd suppose any plant acid like that could
not be particularly good for a human (or fish, or animal) to drink in
any quantity, either.
All of which goes
On 30 Oct 2005 at 0:23, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I think I would have liked to have seen a bit of
land or something for scale
in the shot, Rob...
Hi Ann,
There are clues to scale, the small bubbles visible on the water surface for
instance. The falls section of the image was about a 3.5 drop
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 30 Oct 2005 at 3:39, keith_w wrote:
I can't speak to the presence of other contaminants like tannins and
other water colorants, but I'd suppose any plant acid like that could
not be particularly good for a human (or fish, or animal) to drink in
any quantity, either.
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 29, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Is the histogram also generated from the in-camera JPEG?
That would explain why shots that look as if they're clipping at the
white end on the camera's
Reading about Don's problems with his *istD and built-in flash has
prompted me to write.
My *istD developed a similar problem while using the built-in flash - no
charging, coupled with apparent draining of the batteries and refusal to
trip the shutter. The flash charging circuitry is obviously
On Oct 30, 2005, at 5:17 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
.. trim your responses ...
I'll try. ]'-)
Godfrey
Reading about Don's problems with his
*istD and built-in flash has
prompted me to write.
My *istD developed a similar problem while using the built-in flash - no
charging, coupled with apparent draining of the batteries and refusal to
trip the
This has a joy to it that I feel, certainly makes it a proper
picture. The coral of adult legs implies protection and grants
permission to the children to have their own group experience.
Unusual and very intriguing moment.
Jack
--- Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I might post
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2005, at 5:17 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
.. trim your responses ...
I'll try. ]'-)
A simple OK would have sufficed there. ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Terrific, Paul!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The title says it all.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3836659size=lg
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Cute moment, well caught. Kids are so much fun.
And I just now noticed that there are 2 little peoples there.
Dave
On 10/30/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The title says it all.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3836659size=lg
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Another firm believe shattered
I have to say that I am suprised by the number of people on here who have
had a similar experience to you. Maybe list members are more exploratory
of their camera's capabilities than other users
- Original Message -
From: David Dixon
Subject: *istD and built-in flash
My *istD developed a similar problem while using the built-in flash
So - how many other *istD owners have had this problem?
Nope, no problems of that nature.
The istD has, from what I have read here, been a
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Another firm believe shattered
I have to say that I am suprised by the number of people on here who
have had a similar experience to you. Maybe list members are more
exploratory of their camera's capabilities
Toralf Lund wrote:
I thought I might post a proper picture now:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=children
Or
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=children2
for a smaller file (and reduced quality.)
- T
At 11:41 AM 10/29/2005, you wrote:
Here's one that I call Too Much Cheesecake Will Shrink Your Head
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/2muchcheesecake.html
The pix that G posted were of my first successful attempt with trap
focus. A very neat feature!
What is trap focus?
thanks,
Glen
mike wilson wrote:
I would agree that many of the _problems_ seem to be
associated with power supply. But the _failures_,
necessitating camera return/repair, seem to be quite high.
My _impression_ (which is what most of us have - if I was
really anal about it I would have logged this)
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The file is HUGE ... perhaps in the future you can bring your posted pics
down to a reasonable size. Those on slow dialup connections have to wait a
l-o-n-g time to see the photo.
Right. Sorry. I did scale reduce quality somewhat, but perhaps not as
much as I might.
Your problem makes me wonder if all the battery related problems with
the istD series haven't to do with that dumb RTF. It is after all the
most unreliable part of modern cameras. The fixed built in flashs are
not as much of a problem, but still I do not like them. The are fine for
casual
Also, like most price sensitive manufacturers, Pentax's final quality
control inspector is the customer. You can get a camera that 20 years
ago would never have left the factory. Pentax, and most other
manufactures, know they are doing this and will pretty much cheerfully
repair or replace
I doubt the problem rate is that high. Remember, you usually do not hear
from those who have had no problems, unless they respond gloatingly to
someone elses post of misery grin. The warrenty failure rate is
probaby in the order of 1 to 2%, beyond that Pentax would be losing too
much money, it
Hi Gang
Apologies for 2 pictures in one week.
This is a BW conversion of a shot taken Oct 10, 2005 of the abandoned Maynooth
Station.
Still needing more experience on
this stuff.
You can see the remains of the old bed to the right.
Converted using Channel Mixer in
Happy snap of a niece
http://www.alphoto.com/images/shout.jpg
enjoy
Lovely expression and composition angle.
Dave
Malcolm Smith wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
I would agree that many of the _problems_ seem to be
associated with power supply. But the _failures_,
necessitating camera return/repair, seem to be quite high.
My _impression_ (which is what most of us have - if I was
really anal about it I would
I get Page Not Found.
Jens Bladt wrote:
I geuss I have posted at least one of these photographs earlier.
Nevertheless, together I believe they make a nice little series.
What do uyou think?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/1244174/show/
Regards
Jens
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Finally, a few pics up. Sorry - 18
pics on this page, not suitable for
dial-up unless you're prepared for a bit of a wait.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/snake.html
Very nice Cotty. Hopefully you didi not require Cesar to open any
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=93
I'm sure my wife would be grateful for any comments.
Jack
Nice family keepsake photo Jack. I might have tried to get a tad closer.
Dave
At 02:17 PM 10/29/2005, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: graywolf
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Yeh! I am wondering if anyone else has noticed that most of the
anti-Pentax posts seem to be from people who also say that you don''t
need to waste all that
On Oct 30, 2005, at 7:20 AM, Glen wrote:
The pix that G posted were of my first successful attempt with
trap focus. A very neat feature!
What is trap focus?
If you're using a manual focus lens on the *ist DS (and other models
of Pentax cameras, I'm sure) and leave the AF/MF switch set to
Remind me again ... what the heck does RTF stand for?
I can only speak from the empirical evidence of my experience: I've
owned perhaps 25 cameras with built in flash units in the past 25
years, about 3/4 of them with pop-up mechanisms. I've not had a
single one of them that has had any
On Oct 30, 2005, at 8:01 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I would agree that many of the _problems_ seem to be associated
with power supply. But the _failures_, necessitating camera
return/repair, seem to be quite high.
My _impression_ (which is what most of us have - if I was really
anal about
On Oct 30, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Glen wrote:
I largely agree, but I thought I would mention that I've heard top-
level photographers making statements about what they perceive as
the decline in photographers learning the details of their craft
since 1979.
...
The perception of deteriorating
Sorry for the inconvenience. I have altered the URL after having done a
little Shadow/Highlight work:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/1244553/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30. oktober
Very nice casual portrait shot Godfrey.
Just the distracting ponytail is my only comment
Dave
Yes, been busy. In addition to the latest PAW photo
(highlighted in
another message), I have two additional Others photos and have added
a thumbnail
This day was the first really cold
day this year. A wonderful day, the sun
was low and warm. My dog was in a hurry, so I had to leave a lot of photo
opportunities behind.
But this came out of it
All pentax auto focus cameras will do this, I think. Mount a manual
focus lens, focus on a point in space that a moving object will pass
through, (can't be moving too fast however, no 90 mph fast balls here),
hold the shutter release down. The camera will fire when the object
moves the point
Is there something about the 2.8/35 mm?
Ralf
Yes. It is a well known fact (only for some of us I guess, but do a
search in the archive to see who are the enlighted ones) that this
particular lenses is VERY prone to oil getting on the blades. I've
had 3 of these lenses and all had this
Never mind, I found your other post.
P. J. Alling wrote:
I get Page Not Found.
Jens Bladt wrote:
I geuss I have posted at least one of these photographs earlier.
Nevertheless, together I believe they make a nice little series.
What do uyou think?
I really like it, nice tones and composition.
Regards
Albano
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that
the camera was in manual exposure mode and in a rush
shot off five frames which were at least a stop and
a half too hot. What this
Looks to me that it could use a bit more contrast.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gang
Apologies for 2 pictures in one week.
This is a BW conversion of a shot taken Oct 10, 2005 of the abandoned Maynooth
Station.
Still needing more experience on
this stuff.
You can see
At 11:56 AM 10/30/2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
All pentax auto focus cameras will do this, I think. Mount a manual focus
lens, focus on a point in space that a moving object will pass through,
(can't be moving too fast however, no 90 mph fast balls here), hold the
shutter release down. The
Re: sensors or lenses or eyeglasses that are
multicoated -
what do you guys know of or think of something
called Galaxy?
A friend out west had some and I used it on my
multicoated eye glasses
(not glass) I guess you have to de-dust first
somehow though.
Living in NY and leaving all my windows
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 30 Oct 2005 at 0:23, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I think I would have liked to have seen a bit of
land or something for scale
in the shot, Rob...
Hi Ann,
There are clues to scale, the small bubbles visible on the water surface for
instance. The falls section of
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The title says it all.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3836659size=lg
So then we don't have to look at the photo, right?
(ann ducks)
p.s. black and white Paul? not like you - nice
shot!
Thanks, Dave,
During a recent weekend family outing, my wife was trailing the
grandchildren around with her 1.3mp compact D. Later, at home, I just
pulled up the card she had, earlier, placed in the reader. I realize I
could crop the tiny file some, but I was taken by the DOF accidentally
set by
Hi!
I am also experimenting... In my peculiar way...
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=229421
As usual, please be brutal and honest.
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 30, 2005, at 7:20 AM, Glen wrote:
The pix that G posted were of my first successful attempt with
trap focus. A very neat feature!
What is trap focus?
If you're using a manual focus lens on the *ist DS (and other models
of Pentax cameras, I'm sure) and
Hi!
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was
in manual exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which were
at least a stop and a half too hot. What this tends to do apart from
the obvious is turn the sky a very icky turquoise colour, so rather
than completely
Hi!
Looks to me that it could use a bit more contrast.
Ditto!
Boris
OK, help me out here. If the reviewable results are not representative of
the actual captured image - showing a JPEG image and a JPEG histogram when
shooting RAW - how does the instant review help the photographer. Until
such time as it was clearly explained to me how the review and histogram
H'lo,
You needed a polarizing filter unless you consider the human parts in
the reflection as tiger tidbits.
HONESTY ALERT: I agree, it is a peculiar shot.
So, you succeeded? ;-))
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am also experimenting... In my peculiar way...
What were you trying to achieve?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
I am also experimenting... In my peculiar way...
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=229421
As usual, please be brutal and honest.
Boris
Wow!
Pentax has arrived!
Just opened my Sunday Paper and found a WALMART ad. On page 4...
Pentax SLR Digital Camera with Bonus and a picture of the *ISTD L with
carrying case, 512mb SD card, and 18-55 lens for $798.84 (U.S.)
We're right up there with Canon, Fuji, Kodak and Sony now.
What
On 10/29/05, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, skye wrote:
Beautiful photo of the hills, but all the leaves look so uniformly brown.
That's the trouble with leaf flights... difficult to get close
enough to see individual colors. I've got a few at
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 30, 2005, at 8:01 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I would agree that many of the _problems_ seem to be associated
with power supply. But the _failures_, necessitating camera
return/repair, seem to be quite high.
My _impression_ (which is what most of us have - if I
David,
My first *istD developed this fault. When it was repaired they used an
upgraded circuit board. This may mean that they knew it was a weak spot
and have fixed it but didn't think it was worth a recall. I don't know
when they changed the board but it was in the first year as I got one
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm talking about 60 people who use and post. My impression is that
quite a high proportion of those have had enough trouble to need
intervention by either return or repair. It is entirely possible that
my impression may be skewed by people posting about
M.A. Galloway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow!
Pentax has arrived!
Just opened my Sunday Paper and found a WALMART ad. On page 4...
Pentax SLR Digital Camera with Bonus and a picture of the *ISTD L with
carrying case, 512mb SD card, and 18-55 lens for $798.84 (U.S.)
We're right up there with
If we're doing a survey, my first istDS was returned for replacement. The
OK and directional button on the back didn't work. Other problems were
operator error.
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Mark Roberts
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:37 PM 10/30/2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
OK, help me out here. If the reviewable results are not representative of
the actual captured image - showing a JPEG image and a JPEG histogram when
shooting RAW - how does the instant review help the photographer. Until
such time as it was
Amazingly beautiful, Herb. There's a fairy tale like atmosphere to many of
them. Brilliant.
I especially like the one called 567 - the one with two streams.
I which I had gone photographing the fall colours today - I mean I did, but
there was this group of young people learning paragliding which
At 12:42 PM 10/30/2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
Sorry, but what this really means is Pentax is doomed. Yep, showing up
in Walmart is just a sign that they're going down the toilet and will be
out of business in, oh, about a month now. Declining standards, etc,
etc.
Well, Canon and Nikon are going
I try to keep photos of my own kids to a minimum, but this one's brand
new. Molly joined us very early Saturday morning. Meet Molly:
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=225
Optio 750z. Pretty much auto everything.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the
Shel,
this is a mystery of The Secret Brotherhood Of Raw Shooters. It is only
transmitted from mouth to ear. It must never be made public. Guess why
it's mentioned neither in the manual nor in any review.
I feel sorry for you...
Pancho
( ;^D )
Shel Belinkoff schrieb:
OK, help me out
Congratulations! She looks perfect.
On 10/30/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to keep photos of my own kids to a minimum, but this one's brand
new. Molly joined us very early Saturday morning. Meet Molly:
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=225
Optio 750z. Pretty
Scott,
Congratulations to you and your wife.
Hello Molly! Welcome to the world.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/30/05, skye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations! She looks perfect.
On 10/30/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to keep photos of my own kids to a minimum, but this
On 30/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/snake.html
Very nice Cotty. Hopefully you didi not require Cesar to open any gates
early in the
morning.LOL
Also, a Photo Essay of my wife in conversation with Cesar:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 30, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Glen wrote:
I largely agree, but I thought I would mention that I've heard top-
level photographers making statements about what they perceive as the
decline in photographers learning the details of their craft since 1979.
...
The
Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:42 PM 10/30/2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
Sorry, but what this really means is Pentax is doomed. Yep, showing up
in Walmart is just a sign that they're going down the toilet and will be
out of business in, oh, about a month now. Declining standards, etc,
etc.
Pancho Hasselbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is a mystery of The Secret Brotherhood Of Raw Shooters. It is only
transmitted from mouth to ear. It must never be made public. Guess why
it's mentioned neither in the manual nor in any review.
I feel sorry for you...
And now that you know, if
That's true, I'm not black and whtie. I come in living color (paul
ducks:-). Thanks for the comment. At one time I shot nothing but BW. I
gravitate back to it from time to time.
Paul
On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The title says it all.
Neither of mine have given any problems. When I got the first one, it
sometimes seemed to behave erraticaly. Good battery practice dealt with
that.
John
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:37:54 -, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm talking about
Sorry, but what this really means is Pentax is doomed. Yep,
showing up in Walmart is just a sign that they're going down
the toilet and will be out of business in, oh, about a month
now. Declining standards, etc, etc.
...just wanted to get that in before the usual band of
pessimists
Very nice. Congratulations.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Scott Loveless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2005 20:04
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO -- Brand New Molly
I try to keep photos of my own kids to a minimum, but this
one's brand new.
Nice snap, nicer daughter. Congrats!
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
I try to keep photos of my own kids to a minimum, but this one's brand
new. Molly joined us very early Saturday morning. Meet Molly:
On 30 Oct 2005 at 11:44, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
If we're doing a survey, my first istDS was returned for replacement. The
OK and directional button on the back didn't work. Other problems were
operator error.
The little directional button on my *ist D is very very poor but I've never
That water shot could easily have been taken in the Upper Peninsula of
Michigan. Most of the rivers streams are colored by tannins.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO The land of coke and honey
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29
Cotty,
The whingeing Frank is talking about concerns Pentax bodies. As you
bought a Canon DSLR, you have surely in that sense defected.
However, Frank was making the point that he wished the whingers would
follow your example, buy a body that suits them, and then post to the list
like
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
