Perhaps this is no big deal to some of you, and maybe you even know this,
however, recently I discovered that the camera can be used in manual mode
while using auto focus lenses, and, in so doing, the meter can be bypassed
and the camera used just like any older, mechanical camera, where I can set
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:06:43 US/Eastern
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Three legs are better than one
Some enablement this afternoon. Going to pick up my Slik Pro 700 DX tripod
and short
column.
NOW, thats definetly it for
On 11/5/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm using Gmail I'm not receiving some messages.
Mark!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Like a Duke of Hazards truck.
One of the [movie] Dukes of Hazzard was played by the Duke of Hazards
himself, Johnny Knoxville!
- Dave
More mpx in a sensor the same size as the current one might lead to more
noise, or so I've come to understand. However, considering the state of
digital photography these days, that's a problem that should, hopefully, be
overcome by now. What factors will affect the amount of noise generated
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The Leica Panda was distinguished by a mixture of black and silver
finished bits. Note the silver wind lever, shutter speed selector and
rewind crank on the black body ... this was the inverse of the Panda,
thus the name Anti-Panda.
Leica enthusiasts are a little odd
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
however, recently I discovered that the camera can be used in manual mode
while using auto focus lenses, and, in so doing, the meter can be bypassed
and the camera used just like any older, mechanical camera, where I can set
whatever aperture and
Previously for macros and close-ups outside I've used flash and a pair
of reflectors, one curved, that attach to the top of the flash and the
camera tripod socket. This is not going to be very convenient with the
*istD so I've tried natural light on a very ordinary well known,
probably one of
Have a look at this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/PENTAX-smc-P-FA-300mm-F2-8-ED-IF-Telephoto-Lens-NEW_W0QQitemZ8418828475QQcategoryZ15670QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I might be violating the list policy, now, but:
1. I saw an auction with exactly the same text a couple of days ago -
but under a
Have you got somthing against Gmail Cotty?
vbg
Dave S
On 5/11/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/5/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm using Gmail I'm not receiving some messages.
Mark!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Hi all,
Recently I bought a M 35/2.8 as an aside to another lens purchase. It
arrived yesterday. The lens looks very good, the glass is flawless, the
aperture blades are clean, but open and close very sluggishly. If I push
the diaphragm actuator I feel a lot more resistance than with known
I seem to get most messages, but the timing is very odd.
It has been like that for some time now. And I am frustrated by this.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Yep. I use my D in manual mode quite frequently. It's always in manual
when I'm shooting birds with long glass, even though my 400 is an A and
capable of full metering support.
On May 11, 2006, at 3:03 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Perhaps this is no big deal to some of you, and maybe you even
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/05/11 Thu AM 07:53:17 GMT To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Anti-Panda?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Like a Duke of Hazards truck.
One of the [movie] Dukes of Hazzard was played by the Duke of Hazards
himself, Johnny Knoxville!
Quoting Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I seem to get most messages, but the timing is very odd.
It has been like that for some time now. And I am frustrated by this.
TeleNor has quite good routing agreements with the operators of the American
backbones.
NextGenTel, which is my provider, has
I've had a couple where it was the grease used to
lubricate the aperture lever itself.
Remove the mount from the lens and check, it's an
easy fix IF the mount screws are not frozen.
Use a screwdriver that fits them _perfectly_ or
they'll probably strip.
Don
-Original Message-
From:
Well worth resending, or I would have missed it too.
Q-Ts, both of them.
D
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sorry for the flood. This is the first one that showed up in my mail.
I assumed we all got the same thing, and that the earlier sends never
made it through. I guess one can't assume anything
Hi Lucas,
Have you checked that the aperture lever is not bent? That could be one little
devil to make problems...:-)
Also, it could be that lubrication from the focusing thread has migrated onto
the base of the aperture blades. This doesn't necessarily show through the
glass. That's what had
Question for any users of the A*200 macro. Would you use one without a
tripod mount?
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The list is gasping for breath. It seems that very few messages are
getting through. I sent about five today. Only one made it to my
mailbox. And I've received only about a dozen overall.
Join the club, Paul! :-)
The number of list oddities has
Juan Buhler wrote:
I had a bit of an epiphany yesterday.
[ ... ]
I still have my Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'm happy with its
results. It is SCSI though, which means I have to use it from my old
PC--this is the only reason that PC hasn't been discarded yet.
So, will you be selling the
Have a look at this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/PENTAX-smc-P-FA-300mm-F2-8-ED-IF-Telephoto-Lens-NEW_W0QQitemZ8418828475QQcategoryZ15670QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I might be violating the list policy, now, but:
This listing is gone, now. Also, after looking through recent list posts
again, I realise
Apologies for eventual duplicates...
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The list is gasping for breath. It seems that very few messages are
getting through. I sent about five today. Only one made it to my
mailbox. And I've received only about a dozen overall.
Join the club, Paul!
Quoting Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Question for any users of the A*200 macro. Would you use one without a
tripod mount?
No.
Well... If you work hand held exclusively, I suppose...:-)
Jostein
This message was sent using
Jostein wrote:
Apologies for eventual duplicates...
Yep, got them both. :-)
S
This is a repeat message. The first one apparently didn't go through.
I have an interesting photographic situation and I'd to get some opinions on
the best way to proceed.
I hang a suet feeder in a tree that's about 12' from the bathroom window. The
feeder brings in woodpeckers and other birds
Op Thu, 11 May 2006 12:54:49 +0200 schreef Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have you checked that the aperture lever is not bent? That could be one
little
devil to make problems...:-)
Hmmm, it looks parallel to the protective flange. However, there _are_ two
parallel, diagonal scratches on the
I'd use the flash in manual mode with the camera set to X sync speed and
the aperture set according to the distance.
Perhaps 1/3-1/2 stop under to assure good saturation.
This way you'd be assured of correct exposure with no P-TTL preflash to
spook the critter. (Yep, coons are fast!)
Either flash
It's kind of hard without a tripod. At f4, it is a slow lens and
needs bright light for hand held shots. Also the depth of field is
small so you want to stop down from f4.
Delicate flowers in harsh daylight are no fun, but bugs would be OK.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/11/06, Derby Chang [EMAIL
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On May 10, 2006, at 9:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d601309.jpg
Well composed and quite sharp, but far too green on my monitor.
Have another look - I just did a more fastidious conversion (rather
than last night's quick-and-dirty job).
Tom Reese wrote:
This is a repeat message. The first one apparently didn't go through.
I got the first one last night. This one this morning.
I have an interesting photographic situation and I'd to get some opinions on
the best way to proceed.
snip
I'd go with manual flash for this one. With
This may just be dueling monitors but the first one
looked good, this one looks too blue to me.
(I just calibrated Tuesday)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 7:24 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: First PESO in
On 11 May 2006 at 20:56, Derby Chang wrote:
Question for any users of the A*200 macro. Would you use one without a
tripod mount?
Not really practical for high mag shots without a big flash rig.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Bob,
I thought so. Anyone who is looking, KEH just received one, without the
tripod mount.
Hmmm...Adorama have the Sigma 180 macro (non-DG) on sale at the moment.
With the Aussie climbing up past US78-79c, it is getting tempting.
D
Bob Sullivan wrote:
It's kind of hard without a
Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On May 10, 2006, at 9:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d601309.jpg
Well composed and quite sharp, but far too green on my monitor.
Have another look - I just did a more fastidious conversion (rather
than last night's
I'm Comcast, also, and having the same erratic sluggish experience with
the list.
All other folders appear to be handling mail normally.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on comcast. I'm getting all my normal mail. But my outgoing and
incoming list messages are
Don Sanderson wrote:
This may just be dueling monitors but the first one
looked good, this one looks too blue to me.
(I just calibrated Tuesday)
How about if I do a custom conversion to match the monitor of everyone
who'd like a copy? Probably too much work, eh?
On my monitor (calibrated two
M28/2.8 and M35/2.8 (and M35/2?) seem to be prone to sticky, slow
apertures. Needs a CLA.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/11/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Thu, 11 May 2006 12:54:49 +0200 schreef Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have you checked that the aperture lever is not bent? That
Tom,
Give the AF500 a try. You might also want a 200mm lens.
I've shot at twilight rolling into darkness and TTL has been great on the PZ-1.
I expect you'll get more than one shot at the racoon.
I don't think the flash will scare him at all.
Good luck, Bob S.
On 5/11/06, Tom Reese [EMAIL
All this talk about anti-Pandas has made me want to post the real thing.
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Panda.jpg
A200 AF1.7 at the San Diego Zoo in March
Regards, Bob S.
Minor inconvenience pout.
For the past several days, when I click on an html it comes up on a
half screen. Anyone (if this gets through) have a fix suggestion for me
in lay terms, please.
Thanks,
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail
Shel, I'm amazed, that was the first thing I figured out how to do.
Given you're feelings on in camera meters I would have expected most of
your shots were done that way.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Perhaps this is no big deal to some of you, and maybe you even know this,
however, recently I
Mark,
Better color, and a nicely whimsical pic. I like the
way one bird is looking right at the camera while the
other is upside down.
Is the focus a little off? It looks as though the
seeds in the feeder are sharper than the face of the
upright bird.
Rick
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whatever it was, it's gone now.
Toralf Lund wrote:
Have a look at this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/PENTAX-smc-P-FA-300mm-F2-8-ED-IF-Telephoto-Lens-NEW_W0QQitemZ8418828475QQcategoryZ15670QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I might be violating the list policy, now, but:
1. I saw an auction with exactly the
Better yet, send someone out there to play the racoon and have them hold an
incident flash meter. That would allow you to dial in a perfect exposure with
no film waste or experimentation.
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Reese)
This is a
Derby Chang wrote:
Question for any users of the A*200 macro. Would you use one without a
tripod mount?
D
For insect macros with a flash on an arm no tripod would be required.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
On 11/5/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Have you got somthing against Gmail Cotty?
Not at all. Please, go ahead and offer me a couple of dozen :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I would try full-power manual on the AF500. When shooting outdoor flash at
night, it's hard to overexpose from that distance. You have no ambient light
support and no walls to reflect the flash. I'd shoot a test shot when the
racoon isn't around. I'd guess you'll need about f8 @ ISO 400, but
Doug Franklin wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Other than the occassional out of sequence thread, I don't seem to be
having any problems with recieving messages.
You might want to query your ISP regarding where in their chain the
messages are getting dropped.
Yep. Everything seems fine
:-)
I am a little surprised that you didn't look at Manual exposure mode
earlier. I use mine that way a bit of the time, and all the time when
I'm using the external flash.
Godfrey
On May 11, 2006, at 12:03 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Perhaps this is no big deal to some of you, and maybe
Yep, given the same construction (a different design may be better or
worse) a smaller pixel actually has a bit less noise than a larger one.
However it also acquires a lot less signal, so as Toralf says the S/N is
worse.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Jostein wrote:
The cumulative response time (latency) is effectively doubled by this, which
could affect email transmission. Especially in high-traffic periods.
Routing is in general determined by routing agreements between different ISPs
and their network operators, which could
Rick Womer wrote:
Better color, and a nicely whimsical pic. I like the
way one bird is looking right at the camera while the
other is upside down.
That's exactly what appeals to me about it. There were some shots that
were technically better, but just too static.
Is the focus a little off? It
On 5/11/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/5/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Have you got somthing against Gmail Cotty?
Not at all. Please, go ahead and offer me a couple of dozen :-)
Ahhh. You can't trick me.
:-)
Dave
Previously for macros and close-ups outside I've used flash and a pair
of reflectors, one curved, that attach to the top of the flash and the
camera tripod socket. This is not going to be very convenient with the
*istD so I've tried natural light on a very ordinary well known,
probably one of
I think whoever is managing this list needs to wake up and do something
about it! geez
Norm
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The list is gasping for breath. It seems that very few messages are
getting through. I sent about five today. Only one made it to my mailbox.
And I've
The only way to know what order the posts were made in with this list
at present is to switch to digest mode and read the digests.
Godfrey
That also seems to be the only way I can see your posts. The last few days
I've seen nothing directly from you on the list, only in the digest.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
The only way to know what
order the posts were made in
with this list at present is to
Same here for a lot of people's posts.
Mind you, this is not a bad way to go. On one or two lists I've
participated in, *all* the conversation happened in response to
messages from a digest. It gives people time to think before
responding and not just react out of hand. I'm not suggesting
I agree with the manual flash, especially since that tree is not going
to move so you can set the exposure very accurately. Another thing to do
is check out your setup before the critter shows up. Do some test
exposures and get them developed. If the feeder and tree are properly
exposed the
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Perhaps this is no big deal to some of you, and maybe you even know this,
however, recently I discovered that the camera can be used in manual mode
while using auto focus lenses, and, in so doing, the meter can be bypassed
and the camera used just like any older, mechanical
On this list the digest has consistently produced posts containing the
whole digest as a quote. If I wanted to read a digest I would subscribe
to the digest, but I would not post messages to the list from it. Also
unless the digest has changed it is hard to follow threads in it.
Doug has said
This guy apparently has an inexhaustible supply of hijacked
accounts.
Or an inexhaustible supply of the FA* 300 F2.8.
Joe
What spam has made it to the list?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: graywolf
I do find it funny that so much legitimate email goes
off into limbo, but the spam seems to have no problems
getting here.
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jostein wrote:
Apologies for eventual duplicates...
Yep, got them both. :-)
LOL. I got both your replies, but only the second of my own attempts.
The trickle of posts has been quite stable today, but evidently not
complete yet.
Jostein
Hi Fred
I like your photos despite the frustrating small sizes in your presentation.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Fred Widall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:52 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESOs: Infrared landscapes
It was a beautiful
Hi Paul
It seems most PDML mails reach me here in Switzerland I got yours 3 times.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:05 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Playing Dolls (Resend)
Sorry for the
DNG files are not Photoshop directly, they're handled by the Camera
Raw plugin. Camera Raw v2.4 is what you should be using with
Photoshop CS, it handles the DNG files correctly. It's also the last
version of the Camera Raw plugin compatible with CS.
You should be converting your files
DNG files are not Photoshop directly, they're handled by the Camera
Raw plugin. Camera Raw v2.4 is what you should be using with
Photoshop CS, it handles the DNG files correctly. It's also the last
version of the Camera Raw plugin compatible with CS.
You should be converting your files
On May 11, 2006, at 9:47 AM, David Oswald wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Perhaps this is no big deal to some of you, and maybe you even
know this,
however, recently I discovered that the camera can be used in
manual mode
while using auto focus lenses, and, in so doing, the meter can be
On May 11, 2006, at 9:58 AM, graywolf wrote:
On this list the digest has consistently produced posts containing
the whole digest as a quote. If I wanted to read a digest I would
subscribe to the digest, but I would not post messages to the list
from it. Also unless the digest has changed it
On May 10, 2006, at 4:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... NOW, thats definetly it for buy stuff for this year. I Promise.
After splurging on the custom focusing screen yesterday, those tarts
at BH Photo sent me a notification that they had the FA77 black
finish in stock again. A moment of
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cesar Matamoros II
Subject: Re: Another one bites the dust.
William,
It seems like you are doing what you want to do. This is the way to go
for you.
So will you be a man of leisure at GFMtn?
César;
I finish my lab job
You don't need any disclaimers, girl, these are lovely...
I like the whole group as a group, actually... at the moment
I can't
bring up every single one on my monitor (in a time crunch on
other matters)
I'd like to see 12 of them as a dodecahedronish assembly
(have I got that right?)
Until I
Will the MZ-S body allow f/stop control when using lenses without
aperture rings?
I sent this question to Pentax, CO. but the answer was unintelligible.
Thank y'all,
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It just didn't occur to me that it could be used with auto focus lenses -
chalk it up to my ignorance. In any case, I'm happy to have made the
discovery, even if I am the last to know about it ;-))
Aren't these discoveries sweet? I still recall my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To answer the question - use a lens that
produces good bokeh?
Norm
This from a guy who puts gravy on everything.
vbg
Dave
Mark!
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Jack Davis wrote:
Will the MZ-S body allow f/stop control when using lenses without
aperture rings?
I sent this question to Pentax, CO. but the answer was unintelligible.
You will only have P and Tv modes.
Kostas
I'd tell you, your an evil man, but I think you know that...
Cotty wrote:
On 11/5/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Have you got somthing against Gmail Cotty?
Not at all. Please, go ahead and offer me a couple of dozen :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Sez you!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Same here for a lot of people's posts.
Mind you, this is not a bad way to go. On one or two lists I've
participated in, *all* the conversation happened in response to
messages from a digest. It gives people time to think before
responding and not just
Only in Tv and Program modes... You'll get no manual control over the
diaphragm. The best you could do would be to use the exposure overrides
and exposure lock, (I think the MZ-S has exposure lock).
Jack Davis wrote:
Will the MZ-S body allow f/stop control when using lenses without
I'll just note that all D-FA lenses have aperture rings. The only lenses
that lack them are FA-J and DA lenses and the latter are digital specific.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
Only in Tv and Program modes... You'll get no manual control over the
diaphragm. The best you could do would be to
The MZ-S does have AE lock.
Thanks, P.J.
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only in Tv and Program modes... You'll get no manual control over
the
diaphragm. The best you could do would be to use the exposure
overrides
and exposure lock, (I think the MZ-S has exposure
As I guessed. Thanks, Kostas.
Jack
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Jack Davis wrote:
Will the MZ-S body allow f/stop control when using lenses without
aperture rings?
I sent this question to Pentax, CO. but the answer was
unintelligible.
You
Jack Davis wrote:
Will the MZ-S body allow f/stop control when using lenses without
aperture rings?
I sent this question to Pentax, CO. but the answer was unintelligible.
The MZ-S will control the aperture of lenses that lack aperture ring.
It will work fine in P, and Tv modes. I don't
Tom,
F and FA lenses tell the body how far away the focus
point is, and the body uses this information (along
with the OTF metering) to regulate the flash.
That said, since you're shooting a dark subject in the
dark, some exposure compensation would seem a good
idea.
I've shot raccoons (in the
On 5/11/06, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Buy two M6 cameras, one black and one chrome. Swap their levers. Back to
ebay. Very rare collectors items...
LOL!!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Thanks Godfrey, Dave ...
Knowing these techniques makes the camera even more user friendly for me.
The idea of using the DS as a completely manual camera, and also using the
AE-L technique, has made me like the camera even more, and, for me at
least, pretty much gets rid of the bugaboo of
Set it on manual. You know the guide number, aperture, flash-to-subject
distance, and film speed so you will get a perfect exposure (provided the
flash has the power to cover the distance). There is no benefit in this
situation to using a reading based on reflected light.
--
Cheers,
Bob
---
Guide numbers are calibrated for interior rooms with walls and ceilings that
reflect, and average ambient light. Give it one to two extra stops if you
calculate exposure based on the guide number and distance.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob W [EMAIL
I don't think you have to hide just ride in with him. However whether
you could manage to stay is up in the air. They have made a lot of
changes, for instance I no longer get a pass, and I understand they will
be checking on campers unlike in the past. As I understand it, this is
mostly
I think whoever is managing this list needs to wake up and do something
about it! geez
Norm
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The list is gasping for breath. It seems that very few messages are
getting through. I sent about five today. Only one made it to my mailbox.
And I've
BTW, the best way to accomplish this shot would be to check exposure when the
coon is not present with an incident flash meter. Just have someone stand at
the feeder in the dark and point the meter at the camera. Then trigger the
flash to get your stop. Anything else is going to be guesswork in
Doug is fixing it. But I'm sure that requires a lot of work. We just have to be
patient. I wasn't complaining. Just pointing out the slowdown. It's been MUCH
better today, at least at my station.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Norman Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go back to sleep, Norm. Doug has already posted is intended
improvements. It probably will be all fixed by next week.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Norman Baugher wrote:
I think
On 11/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Doug is fixing it. But I'm sure that requires a lot of work. We just
have to be patient. I wasn't complaining. Just pointing out the
slowdown. It's been MUCH better today, at least at my station.
Paul
Paul,
Norm's sarcasm literally
It's just so inconsiderate of him.
Norm
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go back to sleep, Norm. Doug has already posted is intended
improvements. It probably will be all fixed by next week.
Norman Baugher wrote:
I think whoever is managing this list needs to wake up and do something
Cotty wrote:
Paul,
Norm's sarcasm literally drips off him. I don't think the man has ever
said anything in his life that wasn't tainted with humor. You will meet
him, it's only a matter of time.
Oh my god, is Norm coming to GFM again? Run away!
Speaking of which, I'm wearing a black armband
Unless you have a Lumadyne, then the GN is accurate outdoors at night.
proved to my satisfaction with my old 400WS unit which had a GN of 220.
I photographed my dark green '86 Ford 4x4, f22 at 10 feet on Ektachrome
in the woods at night. Perfect exposure. Of course back in those days
Lumadyne
I just downloaded today, first since last night I have 125 messages to
review!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: worst day yet for list problems
The list is gasping for breath. It seems that very few messages are
getting through.
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
