Igor, it is totally a good thing that I did not drink any tea or coffee
at the moment I opened the picture... Boy I had a good laugh...
On 11/18/2012 9:52 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
I thought you might enjoy this difficulty of choice:
http://www.gexxxdesign.ru/pictures/canon2.jpg
or for large
I thought you might enjoy this difficulty of choice:
http://www.gexxxdesign.ru/pictures/canon2.jpg
or for large size:
http://www.gexxxdesign.ru/pictures/canon3.jpg
It says: (in Russian)
I don't know what to choose
Each lens has an adjective, which follows the pattern:
a bit too _-ish
http://www.rpphoto.com/images/howto/Anna%20and%20Turbo.jpg
The battery, no the girl. She has mad eyes.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Nahh, she is just crazy about that big gun.
Just admit it Cotty, you really want one of these next, the girl not the
gun ;-). Or maybe both.
Antti-Pekka
On 05/11/07, Antti-Pekka Virjonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just admit it Cotty, you really want one of these next, the girl not the
gun ;-). Or maybe both.
Hey I'll take what i can get!
Seriously, I'm done with buying kit for now. I just won a K50 1.4 and
that completes my purchases for
Nothing really wide in that lineup though. Not at least in that format.
Cotty wrote:
On 05/11/07, Antti-Pekka Virjonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just admit it Cotty, you really want one of these next, the girl not the
gun ;-). Or maybe both.
Hey I'll take what i can get!
On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:56 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 05/11/07, Antti-Pekka Virjonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just admit it Cotty, you really want one of these next, the girl
not the
gun ;-). Or maybe both.
Hey I'll take what i can get!
Seriously, I'm done with buying
On 05/11/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nothing really wide in that lineup though. Not at least in that format.
This is true. Already my shooting habits mean that I use the A20 a lot,
not so much the 85. The 50 will be fine, and then the 85 can come back
to EOS ;-)
If I want
Good point! Guess I wasn't thinking...
Christian
graywolf wrote:
Why not do the initial build at home then move the box to your parents?
Christian wrote:
A friend added to the paranoia the other day and suggested running
another rsync job to another Linux box at my parents' house for
The fires in California got me thinking about my image storage and
backup requirements. I thought, what if I had to leave my house and
only had a few minutes to get the family to safety? All my kids' and
family pictures are stored digitally and I worry about losing them to
natural disaster
On 02/11/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
On a happy note: I just took delivery of a beautiful 580EX to replace
my dead Smegma 500. m shiny, new flash.
Ooooh. I've had mine for a while now - still haven't figured it out. I
hate flash. I stick the camera on manual, 1/250th and
Cotty wrote:
Dude - you want to move from there, sounds like a dangerous place to live.
Wild, wild, Freaking, West... Even my Kid's hamster is armed
On a happy note: I just took delivery of a beautiful 580EX to replace
my dead Smegma 500. m shiny, new flash.
--
Christian
Christian wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Dude - you want to move from there, sounds like a dangerous place to
live.
Wild, wild, Freaking, West... Even my Kid's hamster is armed
On a happy note: I just took delivery of a beautiful 580EX to replace
my dead Smegma 500. m shiny, new
On 02/11/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
what if I had to leave my house and
only had a few minutes to get the family to safety? All my kids' and
family pictures are stored digitally and I worry about losing them to
natural disaster or some other tragedy including computer
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While a little performance may be lost, might it be better to go with a
non-RAID configuration and be sure that Windows swap and Photoshop scratch
are on two independent physical devices? Any one have experience with this
exactly.
Also, I'm a little
as to make
microdrives look like dinosaurs.
Tom C.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT- PC, Photoshop, and RAID Decisions, Decisions
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:04:49 +0900
At 05:03 AM 2/11
She looks like she can chew up nails and spit them out as bullets...
Cotty wrote:
On 02/11/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
On a happy note: I just took delivery of a beautiful 580EX to replace
my dead Smegma 500. m shiny, new flash.
Ooooh. I've had mine for a
P. J. Alling wrote:
She looks like she can chew up nails and spit them out as bullets...
My kind of girl and she excellent taste in lenses. :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Cotty wrote:
http://www.rpphoto.com/images/howto/Anna%20and%20Turbo.jpg
The battery, no
Why not do the initial build at home then move the box to your parents?
Christian wrote:
A friend added to the paranoia the other day and suggested running
another rsync job to another Linux box at my parents' house for even
more redundancy. Not a bad idea... The initial sync would take
I'm within hours from making a decision regarding a new desktop.
I'm currently using PS2. The desktop comes with Vista Home Premium, though
it's possible I'll go to XP Pro depending on how performance seems. I'm on
a laptop at present with Vista Business. No major complaints after turning
I use a plumped up version of option one: five 500 GB non-RAID SATA drives. I
back up important work on alternate drives as necessary, and I back up all
photo files on DVD. Non-RAID individual drives give me lots of flexibility.
That's what I like.
Paul
-- Original message
PS2... meant Photoshop CS2.
Tom C.
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT- PC, Photoshop, and RAID Decisions, Decisions
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:03:51 -0700
I'm within hours from making a decision regarding a new desktop
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: OT- PC, Photoshop, and RAID Decisions, Decisions
I'm within hours from making a decision regarding a new desktop.
I'm currently using PS2. The desktop comes with Vista Home Premium,
though
it's possible I'll go to XP Pro depending on how
At 05:03 AM 2/11/2007, you wrote:
I'm within hours from making a decision regarding a new desktop.
I'm currently using PS2. The desktop comes with Vista Home Premium, though
it's possible I'll go to XP Pro depending on how performance seems. I'm on
a laptop at present with Vista Business. No
On 10/9/05, Herb Chong, discombobulated, unleashed:
from a megapixels point of view, they have settled. higher frame rate has
its cost. on the film side of things, the tradeoff never had to be made in
the same way. a piece of film has the same resolution in every camera body,
as JCO is fond of
: Saturday, September 10, 2005 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
AFAIK it is Canon's plan to consolidate the top line into one model,
obviously full frame with the higher frame rate, and that's just a matter
of the electronics handling the data quickly enough. It will happen. They
don't want
...
- Original Message - From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
The only one I'm aware of is the (much) larger buffer in the D70, D50
and 350D/XT and the generally better write speeds. AF
On 8/9/05, Herb Chong, discombobulated, unleashed:
i said mid-range Nikon and Canons. that means 1D Mk2 and D2H.
Please define a top-of-the range Nikon and Canons.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 9/8/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that waiting for the next model will provide a
significant improvement that's cost effective.
cheers,
frank
Neither do I. But more MP will give me more room for cropping (yup,
I'm a lousy photographer who can't get the
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Btw: did you saw the dpreview news? There is a new Sony camera, a
prosumer with the new 10MP APS-C sized Sony sensor. That's the reason
I don't know if I should wait or not (the sensor, not the camera). The
problem is nobody seems to think we'll see a new DS with this
they cost about half the price of the top of the line bodies.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
Those, being full-on Pro bodies for PJ work, would
D2X and 1Ds Mk2. price is enough.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
Please define a top-of-the range Nikon and Canons.
On 9/9/05, Herb Chong, discombobulated, unleashed:
D2X and 1Ds Mk2. price is enough.
Sorry Herb, I have to disagree. Why would Canon run the 1DsmkII and the
1DmkII in tandem? The answer is that they both fulfil different needs,
based on current technology.
If a sports shooter had unlimited
-
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
If a sports shooter had unlimited funds and had to choose between the two
Canon models above, which one do you think he would choose? And so
On 9/8/05, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go for a high end digital camera now (DSLR) camera. It's not important wich
one as long as it's a Pentax - to facilitate your expensive lenses - and
future lenses. Changing brand is a very expensive PITA. Be prepared to buy a
new body every 2-5
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote on 08.09.05 11:01:
Btw: did you saw the dpreview news? There is a new Sony camera, a
prosumer with the new 10MP APS-C sized Sony sensor. That's the reason
I don't know if I should wait or not (the sensor, not the camera). The
problem is nobody seems to think
I agree with you Jens.
Digital cameras aren't a new technology that needs several improves anymore.
Those days are gone. (even if it was three years ago)
What we have now is enough for most people.
Of course you can wait for the next model, but then, why not wait more
for the *next one* again?
On 9/8/05, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strangely enough, several of us seem to manage quite well with the D
A higher frame rate, and faster AF, would definitely be welcome. But
unless it's your primary source of income the D can serve quite well.
I think we've reached the
respect.
And, I've begun to figure out the processing of RAW files and am very
impressed with the results.
RCB
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
On 9
: R.C.Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
I agree. Faster AF hasn't been an issue for me since all I have are manual
focus lenses. As with computers, the latest model is always a bit obsolete
by the time
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Herb Chong wrote:
all of Pentax's SLRs and all of their DSLRs have limitations that prevent me
from capturing in about 10% of the situations i shoot, by design. these are
situations where i know the mid-level Nikon's and Canons are capable of
getting the shot.
Out of
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Herb Chong wrote:
all of Pentax's SLRs and all of their DSLRs have limitations that
prevent me from capturing in about 10% of the situations i shoot, by
design. these are situations where i know the mid-level Nikon's and
Canons are capable of
buffer size and AF speed. some of them handle focus tracking of moving
objects better too.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
Out
i said mid-range Nikon and Canons. that means 1D Mk2 and D2H.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
The only one I'm aware of is the (much) larger
Thanks for the reminder about the adapter.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
IF you buy a DS and have a few SD cards, THEN buy a D, you are not
necessarily in a bad position. There are several vendors offering SD-
CF card adapters that allow you to use your SD cards
RAW exclusively?)
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. september 2005 22:08
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Decisions, decisions...
Hello everyone!
My brain hurts. To be brief
://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. september 2005 23:52
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Decisions, decisions...
Because different cards donìt give you different taste on images (like
different film).
Because memory cards
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:29:44AM +0200, Jens Bladt wrote:
I love using the D, except the buffer is too small (make five shots, then
wait 30-40 seconds :-(
AF is too slow for some occations. It's not a camera for sports photography.
For that you'll need 8 4-8 FPS, a larger buffer and very
Hello everyone!
My brain hurts. To be brief, I decided to go digital - mostly due to
some unpleasant experiences with filmminilabs.
I'm sure I'll enjoy an *istDS, it's a great camera. But... I can't
stop thinking what will the next model looks like? - you know, few
more MPs would help me change
One big question is how much you are willing to spend. The DS is
about as low as it is going to get. A great time to buy it. The D
replacment will likely come in at a price point significantly higher -
could be as high or higher than when it was introduced. Are you
willing to spend $1500-$2000
Well, in Romania the *istDS is over 1000 euro (strange, but there is
an *istD at a slightly lower price. Hmm... faster or wireless
flashgrip? confused. again. ). I'm willing (but not happy) to pay
the price, but for the *istD2... 2000$ (1500euro, but I guess it will
be closer to 2000 around here)
Last time I looked (yesterday) KEH had two LN- istD bodies for $725.00
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 9/6/2005 1:43:14 PM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
Well, in Romania the *istDS is over 1000 euro (strange
The Ds is often selling for less than the DL these days, which for what
it is, makes it an incredible bargain.
The Ds2 will probably sell for an intermediate price between the D,
(which is still a current model), and DL.
I don't think you could find a better price/performance ratio than the
Ds
I am quite happy with the image quality and capabilities of the DS
for my work. When I realized that it sufficed for my needs, I decided
to wait through the summer to see if anything substantially better
would be announced for release before the end of the year. The DL was
announced, end
On 9/7/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
That's an excellent ideea! Thanks! grin
(no offence, I really appreciate your help - and I think you're right)
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
I agree 100% with Peter and Bruce, unless you want to go for a used body.
Then the KEH offer sounds pretty good. If after using the DS for a while,
I find that I like the idea of digital, I'm thinking that a good used D may
be my second body, unless there's something really new from Pentax which
Shel,
I don't find to be a great idea mixing SD and CF, unless you truly need some
D specs.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
I agree 100
I don't see what difference it makes. I shoot different brands and types
of film. Why don't you think it a good idea?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Dario Bonazza
Shel,
I don't find to be a great idea mixing SD and CF, unless you truly need
some
D specs.
and enough SD for your needs. Why?
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
I don't see what difference it makes. I shoot different brands and types
of film
@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
I don't see what difference it makes. I shoot different brands and types
of film. Why don't you think it a good idea?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Dario Bonazza
Shel,
I don't find to be a great idea
[Original Message]
From: Dario Bonazza
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
In other words, if you need say 1GB (max.), you have to buy 2 GB (1 GB CF
+
1GB SD) for having 1 GB wit any camera (in case one fails, in case you
are
continuing using one for some reason, etc.).
Dario
when/if the time comes to get a second body.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Dario Bonazza
Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...
In other words, if you need say 1GB (max.), you have to buy 2 GB
(1 GB CF
+
1GB SD) for having 1 GB wit any camera (in case one fails, in case
you
In a message dated 9/6/2005 1:44:13 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a) buy the *istDS
b) wait a little for the DS2 (well, buying from bhphotovideo is cheaper)
c) wait for the DS2 replacement. That could mean... next summer? Or I
can hope to see it at PMA?
WTF, my car is
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, storage cards are reasonably inexpensive and generally a one-
time purchase. Two 1G cards rated at 45-60x, in either CF or SD
format, are a little less than $160. That's ten rolls of film plus
processing, less than two/three weeks
Hi,
Monday, January 17, 2005, 5:06:57 AM, Amita wrote:
HP has that. And Epsons can be converted. Still you can not
get the contrast
range that you can with a good silver print.
I just heard about a company called Lyson that sells a package of black
inks, software and print drivers for
On 16/1/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
So you equate grain, or rather, the lack of it, an indicator of quality ...
correct?
No, not really. Grain was the wrong word to use, I hereby retract it. I
find film (col neg that is) gives a 'spongy' feel to prints, I really
don't know
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pcn Most of the pros I've spoken to are shooting digital for
pcn both BW and color. Most feel their digital prints are better than
pcn the silver prints they produced in years past. In any case, it's
pcn obviously the wave of the future for all
Cotty...
C Paul is not on a crusade, he is taking part in a debate in its own thread
C on the PDML and is merely putting his point of view across. As such, he
C is using his vocabulary as he sees best, and is imparting information. He
C is doing nothing wrong.
And Paul... wrote:
P I'm not
Thanks Frantisek. And I will make every effort to be civil as well:-).
As I mentioned in another post, this discussion is somewhat pointless,
because it's based mainly on conjecture. The only real evidence that
can be offered in regard to film vs. digital is the type of who is
using what
I went for a drive to Kinmount to shoot the old sawmill Saturday. I took the
istD and the
PZ-1 with Tri-X
400 and the 6x7 (empty but with some different rolls just in case) and the SP
for slide
should i want.
Shot about 30 or so istD pictures,one roll of Tri-x and nothing from the
others. I
the
best BW FF 35mm Films
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 4:49 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
I went for a drive to Kinmount to shoot the old sawmill Saturday. I took
the istD
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
William Robb
There are still no dedicated BW inkjet printers? You'd think
someone (Epson,
Canon, etc.) would jump on that sooner or later. Or have an all
black
cartridge (with shades of gray) that can be loaded
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
When you (or JCO) get a moment, can you provide a brief rundown on
what's
needed. No rush ...
A rotary processor is nice, but if you can do bare bones processing,
a stainless tank will do fine
or
C41 )
process, constant agitation seems to be most consistant for this
critical step.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:23 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
One of the beauties of using 85 deg processing is that since
it is only about 12 degrees above room temperture, there
is much less drift in the process temp vs. time in an
untempered process. With 100 deg
JCO wrote:
I use intermittent agitation for fix with BW and Bleach-fix
with C41. I NEVER use intermittent agitation with any developer ( BW or
C41 )
process, constant agitation seems to be most consistent for this
critical step.
As both BW fix and C-41 bleach fix and stabilizer are process to
One more question
Has anyone who has used the Arista 85F chemistry had any negatives printed
by a one hour lab. If so, did they have to make any additional color
corrections to get it to print correctly?
Butch
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
One more question
Has anyone who has used the Arista 85°F chemistry had any negatives
printed
by a one hour lab. If so, did they have to make any additional color
corrections to get it to print correctly?
Butch
to? Silence is golden..
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Butch Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 1:26 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
JCO wrote:
I use intermittent agitation for fix with BW and Bleach-fix with C41. I
NEVER
just assumed
with
a 10 minute time intermittant agitaion would be fine since
I remembered that intermittant was OK with BW fixing...
JCO
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:55 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Decisions
17, 2005 1:58 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
yes an adjustment of the starting temp equal to plus half the total
delta T would be the way to go. But since I used constant agitaion and
they recommended that would give higher contrast ( I read that as more
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
I swear I read somewhere that you could overfix
BW film and that was another reason I didn't want
to change to constant agitation for Fix.
If you are using a sodium based fixer, it's pretty hard to over fix
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
I havent done that but I seriously doubt it would
be needed becase when I scan the arista-developed negs they don't
need any corrections compared to 1-hr lab-developed
C41 negs.
C-41 is nice. It's a pretty
On 17/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
(it was nice and sunny when i set out on my 3 hour tour,yes a 3 hour
tourvbg)
Spooky. You know how you build up a mental image of someone you've never
met? I've always imagined Dave as looking like The Skipper ! (was it
Alan Hale??)
!!
On Jan 17, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Cotty wrote:
No, not really. Grain was the wrong word to use, I hereby retract it. I
find film (col neg that is) gives a 'spongy' feel to prints, I really
don't know how to describe it properly. Digital shots seem 'cleaner',
more representative of the scene...
On 15/1/05, Dave Kennedy, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's 2 comments suggesting I sell the film. Wow. I would find that
difficult making the jump from film to digital cold turkey. hmmm
You'd be surprised.
I wonder how many DSLR owners have picked up a film camera and actually
used it
Hi!
DK What do I do with it?
DK Currently I have:
DK PZ-1, MZ-10 bodies.
DK 28-70/4 FA
DK 70-210/4.5-5.6 F-SMC
DK 50/1.7F
DK 28-200 FA
DK 105/2.8 Kiron Macro
DK 400/5.6 Sigma APO
DK 1.7x AF Teleconvertor
DK Manfrotto Tripod.
DK My ideas :
DK 1) Hold onto it save towards an *istD. Because I
Why? Do you find that shooting digital affords better final quality
prints? Are most of your photos destined for the web or email in some way,
bypassing prints in most instances? If you make prints, how large are
they? (Did you send my high quality BW print yet?) Do you prefer digital
because
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
(I've always disliked processing film - B-O-R-I-N-G), or don't want to
spend the time traveling to and from the lab to get the film processed.
Don't you do mail order in the US? I get a 36exp-colour film
processed, printed twice at 6x4 and a CD for
-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 1/16/2005 6:56:00 AM
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
(I've always disliked processing film - B-O-R-I-N-G), or don't want to
spend the time traveling to and from the lab to get the film processed.
Don't you do mail order
I used my Leica iiif once. When I did my first shoot with the digital,
I took my 6x7 along, but it never came out of its case.
Paul
On Jan 16, 2005, at 5:56 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 15/1/05, Dave Kennedy, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's 2 comments suggesting I sell the film. Wow. I would find that
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
(I've always disliked processing film - B-O-R-I-N-G), or don't
want to
spend the time traveling to and from the lab to get the film
processed.
Don't you do
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
Why? Do you find that shooting digital affords better final
quality
prints? Are most of your photos destined for the web or email in
some way,
bypassing prints in most instances? If you make prints, how
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
I wonder how many DSLR owners have picked up a film camera and
actually
used it since acquiring the digital? It's not that I can't - but I
just
don't want to.
I have, when I need my 15 to act like a really wide
Hi,
Don't you do mail order in the US? I get a 36exp-colour film
processed, printed twice at 6x4 and a CD for 9.75 (around 18-20
dollars, I would say), incl. stamps and what have you. I have done
cheaper (but not as good) in the past.
Kostas
The man who recommended mail-order procecssing
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
Don't you do mail order in the US? I get a 36exp-colour film
processed, printed twice at 6x4 and a CD for 9.75 (around 18-20
dollars, I would say), incl
I shoot a fair amount of color these days ... there's a place for digi
here, but the reasons may not be the same as for other people.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel, I don't think digital is going to be a good choice for much of
what you do. There are
Without even looking I can imagine Shel's response to this (grin). Most folks
who still do serious BW would respond similarly. If you shoot nothing but lab
processed 35mm color negative, then yes get a DSLR, you will never pick up a
film camera again.
Me, I can not see a digital camera
are excellent.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 10:20 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
I'd NEVER send my film out to be processed by mail order! While I find
processing film to be boring
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
why not do C41 at home too? Its quick, cheap, easy, and wont get
mishandled. I have been doing my own for about a year now
and would do any labs again. I used to think is was hard, I was
wrong. I do 85 deg
seconds
off.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 12:29 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
why
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
