I guess I'm not as sensitive to price as I am intent on acquiring what I need
to achieve my goals as best I can. I always saw a computer as a tool to
communicate with people and as a tool for my photography, I was never
interested in building one. I've bought Macs because I wanted the shortest
On 2016-08-18 14:11 , John wrote:
There are plenty of PRE-built Windoze systems that match Mac in terms of
"slimmest, lightest, daintiest" and lack of expandability. For a given
price point it seems like the only major difference is the Macs are all
i5 processors and the Windoze machines are all
Like I was told by a boss of mine - I won't bother you with the theory of
bullets, but I ll give you enough ammo to get the job done.
-Original Message-
>From: Paul Stenquist Subject: Re: Mac Yosemite--"This is a bug, not a feature"
>
>
>
>Paul via phone
>
>> On
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Paul via phone
On Aug 18, 2016, at 4:11 PM, John wrote:
On 8/18/2016 3:01 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
It has also been my personal experience that if I want to "just get
things done", most of the time Linux boxes work that way from
installation,
Paul via phone
> On Aug 18, 2016, at 4:11 PM, John wrote:
>
>> On 8/18/2016 3:01 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> It has also been my personal experience that if I want to "just get
>> things done", most of the time Linux boxes work that way from
>> installation, whereas it
On 8/18/2016 3:01 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
John wrote:
On 8/18/2016 1:02 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
The only advantage of Windoze that I can see is it will install & run on
just about anything, which means you don't need a PHD in computer
science & 20 years programming experience to build a
John wrote:
On 8/18/2016 1:02 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
And for the record, I'm no Microsoft fanboy, I will voluntarily use a
mac. I've bought one computer that came with Windows that I did not
convert to Linux. But, when I bought that laptop sometime around 1991, I
On 8/18/2016 2:59 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 17, 2016, at 10:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
...No matter what operating system you use, it is going to suck. ...
I guess it's no wonder that you're not an operating system designer
or implementor, eh?
Actually, most of the narrative I wrote was told to me directly by Adele
Goldberg (of Xerox PARC) in 1987, when I was applying for a position at her new
venture outside Xerox (ParcPlace Systems). Adele is the primary source, not
anyone at Apple.
It was corroborated later by the other folks I
On 8/18/2016 1:02 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
And for the record, I'm no Microsoft fanboy, I will voluntarily use a
mac. I've bought one computer that came with Windows that I did not
convert to Linux. But, when I bought that laptop sometime around 1991, I
don't think that
Just a nitpick, but the memoir is explicitly not in the public domain.
It's publicly accessible (or at least parts of it are), but that's not the same
thing.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:01:23PM +0200, Henk Terhell wrote:
> As a side issue, the relevant part of Kildall's memoir has been issued
More to the point, the primary source for those on the inside at Apple would be
Steve Jobs, who was a virtuoso at spinning stories in such a way as to put
Apple (and, of course, Steve Jobs) in the best possible light. I'd love to
hear what Woz has to say about this, but he's pretty close
As a side issue, the relevant part of Kildall's memoir has been issued
in the public domain, see The Register:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/04/pc_pioneer_gary_kildalls_unpublished_memoir_revealed/
Interesting reading stuff there about the contacts of Bill Gates with
Gary Kildall.
Henk
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 17, 2016, at 10:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
...No matter what operating system you use, it is going to suck. ...
I guess it's no wonder that you're not an operating system designer or
implementor, eh?
The only OS that I wrote from the metal
On Aug 18, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I thought I might inject some information into this rapidly-becoming-insipid
> thread of BS. From the mouths of the players involved:
(snip)
Thanks for posting that, it was very interesting. I should get around
What background are you referring to? I worked for Apple for a long time, off
and on; I worked for a dozen other companies as well as for myself,
independently, in a wide variety of positions. I'm not in any particular
"camp."
I just do my best to observe what's going on.
G
> On Aug 17,
Thanks for giving us the insider's view from the Apple camp. Now if we only had
someone to relay from the opposite camp, we may be enabled to judge credibility
for ourselves. No offence intended to you, Godfrey, but given your background
it's likely you're not completely objective in this case.
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 10:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> ...No matter what operating system you use, it is going to suck. ...
I guess it's no wonder that you're not an operating system designer or
implementor, eh?
I don't find that operating systems universally suck at all.
Larry Colen wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Different situation entirely. PCDOS was a very simple thing by
comparison to the graphical UI Macintosh OS and didn't require hardly
anything at all to write code for, other than a language and a code
generator. It was an out of date computer
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Different situation entirely. PCDOS was a very simple thing by comparison to
the graphical UI Macintosh OS and didn't require hardly anything at all to
write code for, other than a language and a code generator. It was an out of
date computer practically before it
Didn't realize Cstalyst was as late as '85, so it didn't precede Mac. Should
have kept my copy and my hot rod //GS.
Paul via phone
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 9:11 PM, John wrote:
>
> http://toastytech.com/guis/qcat.html
>
>> On 8/17/2016 8:36 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>
http://toastytech.com/guis/qcat.html
On 8/17/2016 8:36 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
No idea … I never worked with Apple II systems. They were already
phased out in Developer Technical Support by the time I was inside
the walls.
G
On Aug 17, 2016, at 4:15 PM, Paul Stenquist
On 8/17/2016 2:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
John wrote:
On 8/17/2016 1:34 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:06 PM, P.J. Alling
wrote:
Pisses me off that Microsoft is trying to make the whole OS more Mac
like,
in some ways, mostly that aren't
The way I got the story when I worked at IBM in the 90s was that the IBM
PC was a project secret even from IBM's management who thought it was
going to be just a new terminal product to work with IBM's System/32
mini computers.
The team from IBM who were developing the PC was interested in
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:02 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
> The thing about the IBM PC was that it was open architecture, you could build
> any, and I do mean any, device for the BUS, and in the early days Microsoft
> pretty much gave the OS away. I actually had a copy
Quark Word Juggler was very popular among NY journalists when I arrived at
Hearst in 1980. It came with a card you installed in a //+ or //e that expanded
the character set. It was a far better solution than a C/PM box but more
expensive as well. I used Word Juggler on a variety of Apple //s
No idea … I never worked with Apple II systems. They were already phased out in
Developer Technical Support by the time I was inside the walls.
G
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 4:15 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Where does Quark fit into the picture? They sold a Mac-like shell
On 8/17/2016 2:46 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
John wrote:
On 8/16/2016 9:58 PM, Bill wrote:
On 8/16/2016 7:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
No way. Had a series of PCs at work (Winblows 3.1 through XP Pro), and
I have no intention of going back.
Truthfully, I'm sometimes thinking my next computer
The thing about the IBM PC was that it was open architecture, you could
build any, and I do mean any, device for the BUS, and in the early days
Microsoft pretty much gave the OS away. I actually had a copy of QDos,
which was pretty good, if you didn't expect to much. I worked on a
couple of
IIRC, Gates and Balmer bought a licence to CP/M, which had been the only really
successful OS for microcomputers, apart from strictly proprietary ones such as
that used by HP. Even so, it was all a bit mickey mouse until IBM
steam-rollered into play with their IBM PC, which was basically
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
wrote:
>
> (Of course, Balmer and Gates had ripped off someone else's OS source
> code in the first place (can't remember who's specifically at the moment)
Seattle Computer Products. Not actually ripped-off, but licensed
Where does Quark fit into the picture? They sold a Mac-like shell program for
Apple //e and //c called Catalyst at least two years before there was a Mac. I
used it. Given the way it bogged down the //c I ran it on, it was more novelty
than anything else. But it was an interesting glimpse of
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Gonz wrote:
>
> Cool story, interesting players. Could be made into a movie!
Sadly, all the movies made about SJ tend to focus on his personality defects
and overdramatize his capriciousness and emotionality … because that's what
sells,
Cool story, interesting players. Could be made into a movie!
The only things I find that don't fit my understanding are that Xerox
didn't own any Apple stock but instead was given options to buy Apple
stock in return for a peek at their PARC facilities. Plus Apple
didn't give out dividends
Very enjoyable. Every now and then you amaze and inspire me. Thanks for
sharing.
Paul via phone
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>
>> On 17 Aug 2016, at 19:13, John
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
> On 17 Aug 2016, at 19:13, John wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/17/2016 1:34 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:06 PM, P.J. Alling
>>> wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
On 17 August 2016 at 02:58 Bill wrote:
On 8/16/2016 7:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
No way. Had a series of PCs at work (Winblows 3.1 through XP Pro), and
I have no intention of going back.
Truthfully, I'm sometimes thinking my next computer
John wrote:
On 8/16/2016 9:58 PM, Bill wrote:
On 8/16/2016 7:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
No way. Had a series of PCs at work (Winblows 3.1 through XP Pro), and
I have no intention of going back.
Truthfully, I'm sometimes thinking my next computer might be a Mac, but
then I try to make my
John wrote:
On 8/17/2016 1:34 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:06 PM, P.J. Alling
wrote:
Pisses me off that Microsoft is trying to make the whole OS more Mac
like,
in some ways, mostly that aren't helpful.
Mickeysoft has been trying to make
On 17 Aug 2016, at 19:13, John wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/2016 1:34 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:06 PM, P.J. Alling
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Pisses me off that Microsoft is trying to make the whole OS more Mac like,
>>> in some
On 8/17/2016 1:34 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:06 PM, P.J. Alling
wrote:
Pisses me off that Microsoft is trying to make the whole OS more Mac like,
in some ways, mostly that aren't helpful.
Mickeysoft has been trying to make their OSes more
Both Apple and Microsoft built on ideas they brought with them from
Xerox at Menlo Park.
I'd root for Microsoft over Apple at every turn, but in the end, both
OSes enables participation in PDML, so what's the deal. :-)
Jostein
Den 17.08.2016 19.34, skrev Bruce Walker:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at
On 8/17/2016 3:16 AM, mike wilson wrote:
On 17 August 2016 at 02:58 Bill wrote:
On 8/16/2016 7:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
No way. Had a series of PCs at work (Winblows 3.1 through XP Pro), and
I have no intention of going back.
Truthfully, I'm sometimes thinking
On 8/16/2016 9:58 PM, Bill wrote:
On 8/16/2016 7:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
No way. Had a series of PCs at work (Winblows 3.1 through XP Pro), and
I have no intention of going back.
Truthfully, I'm sometimes thinking my next computer might be a Mac, but
then I try to make my iPad Pro do simple
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:06 PM, P.J. Alling
wrote:
>
> Pisses me off that Microsoft is trying to make the whole OS more Mac like,
> in some ways, mostly that aren't helpful.
Mickeysoft has been trying to make their OSes more Mac-like since
Windows 1.0. And they miss
I'm not sure that's a good idea. Memory cards have finite read write
cycles. Reformatting rewrites the entire data structure of the card, it
doesn't erase the data areas to prolong the life of the card, one would
have to use a special utility accomplish that.
Erase all, should, and I say
If you can find someone who will fund me every time I format a card, let
me know. I could use the income.
On 8/17/2016 1:14 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Apologies for veering off here, but I'm curious... Is there a well funded
reason for formatting the memory card every so often?
I know Macs
At least you can tell a PC what application to launch, or none at all,
for a particular file type, without disabling a whole subsystem. Pisses
me off that Microsoft is trying to make the whole OS more Mac like, in
some ways, mostly that aren't helpful.
On 8/16/2016 9:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Probably involves less writing to the card, so the card will last longer.
On August 17, 2016 8:00:50 AM PDT, ann sanfedele wrote:
>I always format any card I have in the camera (K-5) when it gets full
>after I've uploaded everything to my pc - somewhere I read, or someone
>I
I always format any card I have in the camera (K-5) when it gets full
after I've uploaded everything to my pc - somewhere I read, or someone I
respect told me it was better to format than tojust "delete all" -
unless , of course, I decide I'd better keep the card asback-up. 90% of
what I
Formatting in the camera is a quick and easy way to erase the card. That's all.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
> Apologies for veering off here, but I'm curious... Is there a well funded
> reason for formatting the
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Yosemite? Sheesh, doesn't anyone ever keep up to date with software updates
> that I and my colleagues sweat our lives away trying to improve on things
> with? Don't answer that, it was rhetorical ... ;-)
I
m with Rick,
I format only infrequently. I guess that's why I've been able to keep the Photo
app shutdown.
Paul via phone
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 1:14 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
>
> Apologies for veering off here, but I'm curious... Is there a well funded
> reason for formatting the memory
> On 17 August 2016 at 02:58 Bill wrote:
>
>
> On 8/16/2016 7:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> > No way. Had a series of PCs at work (Winblows 3.1 through XP Pro), and
> > I have no intention of going back.
> >
>
> Truthfully, I'm sometimes thinking my next computer
On 16/8/16, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Yosemite? Sheesh, doesn't anyone ever keep up to date with software
>updates that I and my colleagues sweat our lives away trying to improve
>on things with? Don't answer that, it was rhetorical ... ;-)
Still on 10.8.5 and using my 2012
Mac OS does not remove or free up any memory used by items in the trash
can. So if you delete a file on the memory card on a Mac it still takes
up space and cannot be overwritten.
So either empty the trash on the computer or format the card in the
camera to free up used space.
Philip
Apologies for veering off here, but I'm curious... Is there a well funded
reason for formatting the memory card every so often?
I know Macs leave a bit of crud in the file system whenever they get the
chance, but surely the camera would ignore that?
I don't think I have formatted a memory card
Rick Womer wrote:
Paul, that info seems to reside on the card, as it is lost when the
card is formatted in the camera (at least with Yosemite here).
Yeah, I ran into that problem too.
I think this is the solution:
On 8/16/2016 7:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
No way. Had a series of PCs at work (Winblows 3.1 through XP Pro), and
I have no intention of going back.
Truthfully, I'm sometimes thinking my next computer might be a Mac, but
then I try to make my iPad Pro do simple stuff (or stuff that should be
When you plug in a device with photo file on it photos will
automatically open.
When it does this look for a check box on the window header of the
photos app. Uncheck the box and in future it will not automatically open
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 17/08/2016 11:26 AM,
Yosemite? Sheesh, doesn't anyone ever keep up to date with software updates
that I and my colleagues sweat our lives away trying to improve on things with?
Don't answer that, it was rhetorical ... ;-)
Photos has had this bug since it was released. I and several hundred others
keep railing on
Paul, that info seems to reside on the card, as it is lost when the
card is formatted in the camera (at least with Yosemite here).
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> You can choose what devices you wish to auto load from
No way. Had a series of PCs at work (Winblows 3.1 through XP Pro), and
I have no intention of going back.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 8/16/2016 7:26 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>>
>> For the first time since I
You can choose what devices you wish to auto load from in Photo preferences. At
least that's true in El Capitan and with the latest versions of Photo.
Paul via phone
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 9:26 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> For the first time since I installed Yosemite on it
On 8/16/2016 7:26 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
For the first time since I installed Yosemite on it several months
ago, I'm using my MacBook Pro for photo editing. (My home computer is
still running 10.6.8).
Whenever I put an SD card in the slot, Yosemite launches Photo, and
one has to quit Photo
65 matches
Mail list logo