Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 10:25 AM > To: Arjen Markus > Cc: PLplot development list > Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing > > On 2016-12-22 08:27

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-22 08:27- Arjen Markus wrote: > I have just added the version and origin information for Tcl in the Wiki page. Thanks, Arjen. I tweaked that footnote a bit more than propagated all changes to the (duplicate) footnote for the other table. While doing that, it struck me that

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 1:15 AM > To: Arjen Markus > Cc: PLplot development list > Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing > > Hi Arjen: > > I have j

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Arjen: I have just described your recent MSVC + ifort platform tests as the first item in the two tables at and . Please take a careful

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-19 09:39- Arjen Markus wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] [...] >> From the e-mail you wrote back then, I have identified that platform as >> Ubuntu (I >> believe it was on some virtual box you had available to you at

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-21 11:04- Arjen Markus wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] [...] >> I have additional questions about terminology. Is MSVC an IDE? (That is >> implied >> by the wikipedia article about it.) Just out of curiosity is the

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Alan, See below > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 11:50 AM > To: Arjen Markus > Cc: PLplot development list > Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing > > On 2016-12-21

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-21 09:01- Arjen Markus wrote: > I just ran the little script I have for the examples in C, Fortran and Tcl. The PostScript files all came out identical for the corresponding examples. Here are the details for the two compilers: Thanks for that critical test of the Microsoft C/C++

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Alan, I just ran the little script I have for the examples in C, Fortran and Tcl. The PostScript files all came out identical for the corresponding examples. Here are the details for the two compilers: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE 2015 Copyright (C) 1985-2014 Intel Corporation. All

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-19 09:39- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] >> The 5 new reports there are based on the Fortran subset of 4 recent >> comprehensive test reports (Cygwin and MinGW-w64/MSYS2 from you, and >>

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > The 5 new reports there are based on the Fortran subset of 4 recent > comprehensive test reports (Cygwin and MinGW-w64/MSYS2 from you, and > Debian Jessie with CMake-3.0.2 and CMake-3.7.0 from me)

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 4:00 AM > To: Arjen Markus; PLplot development list > Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing > > Thanks for this additional te

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-16 19:00-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > For your new installation of MinGW-w64/MSYS2 there is still a lot of > package installation incompleteness, see footnotes j1, C1, D1, D2, F1, > G2, H2, I1, and J1. But it is a good start that is suitable for this > release, and I will remark more

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-16 13:10- Arjen Markus wrote: > It took some experimenting to get the installation of MinGW-w64/MSYS2 to work properly (some packages need to be installed via the full name - mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc for instance - to get the latest version and even then that does not always happen,

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Hi Arjen: > > That's a really nice piece of news to hear from you. I will take a look at > the details > in that report tomorrow and post it and your prior report for MinGW-w64/MSYS2 > on > our

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-15 07:49- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] >> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 2:31 AM >> >> Well, if I recall correctly, the last time we discussed the >> MinGW-w64/MSYS2 version of cmake,

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-14 12:09- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hm, > > Updating my MinGW-w64/MSYS2 installation was probably a bad idea: [...] > I will have to reinstall it. Preferably at a quiet time, when no Cygwin shell > is running :(. Well, if I recall correctly, the last time we discussed the

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hm, Updating my MinGW-w64/MSYS2 installation was probably a bad idea: $ ls 1 [main] bash (13712) C:\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x180327400/0x1802FE408. This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. Search

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 12:52 PM > > Thanks for that report. The script completed without obvious issues so this > is what > I will report at >

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

On 2016-12-14 07:52- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:28 PM >> @Arjen: >> >> Great. >> >> I should have emphasized you should drop all constraints for these >>

[Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

This is directly not only to Arjen, but also to everybody else here who wants to help out with comprehensive testing for this release. On 2016-12-13 11:49- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] >> Sent:

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results Fortran on MinGW-w64

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > The openwalnut project > > uses the form > > pacman -S mingw64-w64-x86_64-qhull-git > > so I would always stick with that form for

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results Fortran on MinGW-w64

On 2016-03-29 09:58- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Alas, ctest failed and the script got stuck, so I had to kill it. The problem > is presumably that the tests are run in parallel (-j4) and I have had serious > problems with parallel make on Cygwin and MinGW. See the attached output

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results Fortran on MinGW-w64

On 2016-03-29 07:35- Arjen Markus wrote: >> 3. From shared/noninteractive/output_tree/cmake.out (which you should always >> check for WARNING messages to see if anything critical is missing), there is >> a >> WARNING concerning not finding libqhull. That issue severely limits the >>

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results Fortran on MinGW-w64

On 2016-03-29 09:58- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Alas, ctest failed and the script got stuck, so I had to kill it. The problem > is presumably that the tests are run in parallel (-j4) and I have had serious > problems with parallel make on Cygwin and MinGW. See the attached output

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results Fortran on MinGW-w64

. From: Arjen Markus [mailto:arjen.mar...@deltares.nl] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:36 AM To: Alan W. Irwin Cc: PLplot development list Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results Fortran on MinGW-w64 Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mai

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results Fortran on MinGW-w64

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > However, there are still some remaining issues with this Fortran-only test on > your > MinGW-w64/MSYS2 platform. > > 1. Your comprehensive_test.sh.out result shows the following WARNING: > >

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results Fortran on MinGW-w64

On 2016-03-25 08:50- Arjen Markus wrote: > Please find the results of the Fortran test on MinGW-w64 in the attachment. > This was quite fast, of course, only examining one single language, but > still: it is looking very good. Hi Arjen: Thanks for your on-going help with MinGW-w64/MSYS2

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 7:08 PM > To: Arjen Markus > Cc: Greg Jung; PLplot development list > Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin >

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-24 10:22- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > > That certainly did the trick. See the attached list of packages after running > "pacman -Sy" Excellent news, and thanks for that list. If you look for "installed" in that list, you will find that (as you said before) you are out

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Greg, From: Greg Jung [mailto:gvj...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:41 PM To: Alan W. Irwin Cc: Arjen Markus; PLplot development list Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin You may need to revise your list of mirrors, 3.4.1 is found on sourceforge

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

You may need to revise your list of mirrors, 3.4.1 is found on sourceforge but you may have installed msys when the mirrors were pointed at a temporary location. I believe repo.msys2.org/mingw/ is preferred these days but downloads ... sourceforge should be the same:

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-23 08:19- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, Greg, > It looks like the whole list I get is out-of-date - several other packages in > my list that I checked have a lower version number too. The repositories that > seem to be checked (assuming the files "mirrorlist.* are indeed used

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

lot development list > Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin > > On 2016-03-23 07:40- Arjen Markus wrote: > > >> AM: Two odd things here: > >>> 1. You get a report on CMake 3.4.1, whereas I only got 3.3.1 (see > >>

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-23 07:40- Arjen Markus wrote: >> AM: Two odd things here: >>> 1. You get a report on CMake 3.4.1, whereas I only got 3.3.1 (see the list >>> in my follow-up mail) @Arjen: Your 3.3.1 result is inconsistent with the raw list of packages that are available at

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Greg, From: Greg Jung [mailto:gvj...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:58 PM To: Arjen Markus Cc: Alan W. Irwin; PLplot development list Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin Hi Arjen, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Arjen Markus <arjen.

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Arjen, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > > (priority 1) I tried to install CMake for MinGW-w64/MSYS2, but that failed: > > -According to the package manager there is a version 3.3.1, but > on installing it naively (via

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, (priority 1) I tried to install CMake for MinGW-w64/MSYS2, but that failed: -According to the package manager there is a version 3.3.1, but on installing it naively (via pacman -S cmake), I got CMake 3.2.3. -Explicitly installing the package that seems to represent

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin --octave-4

On 2016-03-17 08:57- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] >> >> Ib. disabling octave >> >> There has been no recent PLplot work on the octave binding so you may have to >> keep that disabled. It appears

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-17 14:30- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:03 PM >> To: Arjen Markus >> Cc: PLplot development list >> Subject: RE: comprehensive testing results on

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin - Ada build errors

Hi Alan, Stupid mistake of mine: the current version of the GCC compiler is 4.9.3 and my script had a reference to 4.9.2. After correcting that the Ada binding could be enabled as far as that was concerned, however I get build errors: [ 39%] Linking Ada executable x00a.exe cd

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > The current results do look good, but I would like to review again the > motivation for > the following constraints on this comprehensive test because it has been a > while > since you last made a

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin - Ada build errors

On 2016-03-17 09:13- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > Stupid mistake of mine: the current version of the GCC compiler is 4.9.3 and my script had a reference to 4.9.2. After correcting that the Ada binding could be enabled as far as that was concerned, however I get build errors: [...]

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > I. --cmake_added_options "-DENABLE_ada=OFF -DENABLE_octave=OFF" > > Ia. disabling of Ada > > Please do not disable Ada. I worked hard on that language support during this > release cycle (see 2.2

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin - Ada build errors

Hi Alan, Arjen Markus Sr. Adviseur/Onderzoeker T +31(0)88335 8559 E arjen.mar...@deltares.nl [Logo] www.deltares.com Postbus 177 2600 MH Delft [Deltares Twitter] [Deltares

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

And now with the tar file I promised. Regards, Arjen From: Arjen Markus [mailto:arjen.mar...@deltares.nl] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:58 AM To: Alan W. Irwin Cc: PLplot development list Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin Hi Alan, > -Origi

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > Ib. disabling octave > > There has been no recent PLplot work on the octave binding so you may have to > keep that disabled. It appears that the octave-devel-4.0.0-3 package is > available > for

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-16 11:45- Arjen Markus wrote: > In the attachment you'll find the results for the complete set of tests on > Cygwin. It is looking quite good now. Hi Arjen: The current results do look good, but I would like to review again the motivation for the following constraints on this

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > Thanks for that explanation of the concise versus expanded error messages. > It still > leaves two big question though which is why the artificial error in > Tcl_GetMatrixPtr > generated by my

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

On 2016-03-16 08:04- Arjen Markus wrote: >> So for this case it appears there are consistent >> >> Matrix operator "x" already in use >> >> basic error messages between the two methods. but that basic error message is >> not at all consistent with the above naive interpretation of what should

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] ... > > [...] > > *** PLPLOT WARNING *** > > plmaptex is a no-op because shapelib is not available. > > No matrix operator named "62" > > > > So from that last line I am pretty sure that the "62" in

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

On 2016-03-14 17:34-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > [...] > *** PLPLOT WARNING *** > plmaptex is a no-op because shapelib is not available. > No matrix operator named "62" > > So from that last line I am pretty sure that the "62" in > > $w cmd plmaptex {} "ss/ss64ne_General_Text" 1.0 0.0 0.5 >

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing of MSVC/ifort/nmake

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 10:23 PM > To: Arjen Markus > Cc: PLplot development list > Subject: comprehensive testing of MSVC/ifort/nmake > > On 2016-03-14 07:35- Arjen Markus wrote: > > >

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > And after a lot of complaints about shapelib being missing I ran into the > following > peculiar matrix operator message: > > [...] > *** PLPLOT WARNING *** > plmaptex is a no-op because shapelib

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

On 2016-03-14 14:58-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > I am going to follow up by trying some valgrind runs on Linux for > example 19 without shapelib and for both Tcl and C to see if valgrind > can spot the fundamental memory management issue that is causing the > segfault for your particular (Cygwin)

[Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-14 08:51- Arjen Markus wrote: > I attach the tarball for Cygwin 64 bits - the test was unsuccessful, as pltcl > crashed running example x00. The strange thing is: I can run it manually > without any problem. Note it is not actually x00 that fails. If you look carefully at

[Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing of MSVC/ifort/nmake

On 2016-03-14 07:35- Arjen Markus wrote: > Alas, I tried that [msvc/ifort comprehensive test] this weekend: somehow > CMake gets confused. I have stared at the error messages, but I can make > heads nor tails of the cause. > > Here is what I did: > > 1. I added the directory containing

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk

Hi Arjen: In response to your previous report of the full test with octave where ctest failed virtually silently, I have tried to reproduce that lack of information in ctest.out here by running a slightly modified version of the script which moves plplot_octave.oct to a different directory after

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk

Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:30 AM To: Arjen Markus; Orion Poplawski Cc: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk Hi

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk

@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:30 AM To: Arjen Markus; Orion Poplawski Cc: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on MinGW/MSYS

On 2015-07-10 09:06- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, As I wrote to Walt, I had to fix the logic for inclusion of unistd.h for the MinGW/MSYS platform, but it worked fine. The logic is far simpler than what we had before. The tarball shows a limited but otherwise perfect result. Hi Arjen:

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk

Hi Arjen: First a comment about your Cygwin setup. The cmake.out file revealed (as you mentioned in your first message) that you are having trouble with X. That sounds like exactly the same problem that you intermittently had before. Is it possible installation of _any_ software on Cygwin

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk

saw have nothing to do with Octave). Regards, Arjen -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:21 PM To: Arjen Markus Cc: plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk

On 2015-07-08 15:46- Arjen Markus wrote: Well, I tried it with Octave allowed, but I get build errors - see the tarball. It does not seem to be complaining about 2 versus 4 arguments anymore, but something is definitely wrong. Could that be the SWIG version? (Note: I did not use the very

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk

Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk On 2015-07-08 15:46- Arjen Markus wrote: Well, I tried it with Octave allowed, but I get build errors - see the tarball. It does not seem to be complaining about 2 versus 4 arguments anymore, but something

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk

On 2015-06-17 12:51-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: After some further investigations of details in your report it turns out the error you found was due to a build system inconsistency when ENABLE_tk is forced to OFF. I will work on solving that inconsistency. Hi Arjen: Your comprehensive tests

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk and Ada

On 2015-06-17 10:39- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, Hm, something is failing in the non_dynamic tests: CMakeFiles/pltcl.dir/pltcl.c.o:pltcl.c:(.text+0x20e): undefined reference to `__imp_Pltcl_Init' CMakeFiles/pltcl.dir/pltcl.c.o:pltcl.c:(.text+0x20e): relocation truncated to fit:

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk and Ada

Hi Alan, Yes, updating that list is on my TODO list. I have been rather preoccupied with other things, so have not had the opportunity to sit down for it. I should be able to redo the tests with the latest changes today, though. Regards, Arjen -Original Message- From: Alan

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk and Ada

Hi Arjen: On 2015-06-09 09:24-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: Could you also take this opportunity to update https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/wiki/Setup_cygwin/? That page already has some information (last updated in 2013) concerning packages to install, but it is obviously far from complete.

[Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing on Cygwin with Tcl/Tk/Itcl/Itk and Ada

Hi Arjen: I have changed the subject line for obvious reasons. On 2015-06-09 07:14- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, I adjusted the text on the Wiki page - I removed the remarks that Tk would not compile on Cygwin. That at least is no longer true :). Some things to add: a convenient window

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

Hi Alan, Greg, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Note as soon as Arjen reports comprehensive testing success with MinGW/MSYS without having to take brute-force measures like setting PLPLOT* environment variables to get around the above

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

On 2015-04-21 20:11- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Good detective work! I agree you have completely pinned down the issue now, and I look forward to your commit with the fix for plInBuildTree. I am

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

Hi Alan, The output I got via the –debug option is at least somewhat revealing: markus@L01259 /d/plplot-svn/comprehensive_test_disposeable $ cd shared/build_tree/examples/c markus@L01259 /d/plplot-svn/comprehensive_test_disposeable/shared/build_tree/exa mples/c $ ./x00c -debug plGetDrvDir:

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

On 2015-04-20 13:27-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2015-04-20 12:55-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: Furthermore -debug works fine for me on MinGW/MSYS/Wine, but the only extra output from it comes after the device is selected from the list above. So to debug further you will have to (locally) add

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

On 2015-04-20 21:18-0700 Greg Jung wrote: Alan, Since these strings that are kept in files, that need to be associated with each possible driver, do not change over the years, why maintain a separate location? Why not just compile those strings into the body of plplot.obj? The increase

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

On 2015-04-20 12:55-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: Furthermore -debug works fine for me on MinGW/MSYS/Wine, but the only extra output from it comes after the device is selected from the list above. So to debug further you will have to (locally) add informative pldebug calls to the code near where

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

Hi Arjen: On 2015-04-20 11:31- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, I added the option -do_clean_as_you_go no to the test script. The result is attached. Hopefully this will shed some light on the anomalies MinGW/MSYS is causing. My updated script appears not to be capturing the script itself

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Then attempt to run the built example once with PLPLOT_DRV_DIR set to above and once with PLPLOT_DRV_DIR set to nothing (PLPLOT_DRV_DIR=). examples/c/x00c -debug -dev psc -o test.psc 21 |\ grep -v

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

On 2015-04-20 14:57- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Then attempt to run the built example once with PLPLOT_DRV_DIR set to above and once with PLPLOT_DRV_DIR set to nothing (PLPLOT_DRV_DIR=).

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] That is a pretty cool automated script for running the test and collecting all relevant results into a tarball. The only thing I would add to it is rm -rf ../comprehensive_test_disposeable

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive Testing: Ubuntu 14:10

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 05:00:52PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: On 2015-04-18 22:56+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: Alan, I've finally got time to rerun my comnprehensive tests with Ubuntu 14.10 and try to debug the niggle issues I encountered with the static build (My only change from last time

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive Testing: Ubuntu 14:10

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote: I didn't want to comment on your code, but that was the impression I got! I am using g++-4.9, but I did the g++ --verbose --version test on Ubuntu versions back to 4.4 and all used the colon. I agree, dropping it is perhaps the

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: IMPORTANT: improved collection by script

On 2015-04-19 15:32-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2015-04-19 15:08- Arjen Markus wrote: [ B]y running the example as built in the comprehensive_test_disposeable directory, I found what was wrong: my script did not set the PLPLOT_DRV_DIR environment variable, so that the example could

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: Cygwin

On 2015-04-19 14:15- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] When rewriting this PATH manipulation logic after the 5.11.0 release I screwed up one aspect (forgot the nondynamic case), and your test found that

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: Cygwin

On 2015-04-18 13:08- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Does this new robust logic for Windows detection now work for you? (To make this test of PATH manipulation much faster for our three main

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: MinGW/MSYS

Hi Arjen: Changing the subject line for obvious reasons. On 2015-04-18 14:12- Arjen Markus wrote: Here are the results for MinGW32/MSYS - this fails with the well-known problem of the example not finding the PLplot library. Actually: the progress of the testing script simply halts (as

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive Testing: Ubuntu 14:10

On 2015-04-18 22:56+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: Alan, I've finally got time to rerun my comnprehensive tests with Ubuntu 14.10 and try to debug the niggle issues I encountered with the static build (My only change from last time is that I've had to build cmake from source to get a new enough

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive Testing: Ubuntu 14:10

On 2015-04-18 17:00-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2015-04-18 22:56+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: [] 2) The code in src/CMakeFiles to find the stdc++ library doesn't work for me. [] The problem is that libplplot is a mixed C and C++ library for the nondynamic or static case (because of

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: OpenSuse-13.2: finding stuff

Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Hi Arjen: I think I have found a good bash shell method of automatically detecting any windows platform (using the exe suffix that occurs for the bash fullpathname on all Windows platforms). So

[Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: Cygwin

On 2015-04-17 07:45- Arjen Markus wrote: So I conclude [from all ctests failing] that your fix for computing the PATH is not quite up to its taks yet. This was under Cygwin, using 2.8.11.2 for that platform. Hi Arjen: I changed the subject line to be more appropriate to the subject. When

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: Cygwin

On 2015-04-17 10:05- Arjen Markus wrote: -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Hi Arjen: [] Please have a look at the tarball - I have included all the information you asked for. I cannot find everything I requested in the tarball. So

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: Cygwin

Hi Alan, Oh, I should have checked all this more carefully. Hm, right now there is an update running for Cygwin and this is taking a remarkably long time. I will prepare the new test run by cleaning up the directory. As I thought the script had done that, I copied the subdirectories that

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: Cygwin

Hi Alan, I hope this tarball is complete. -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] 1. Output from the printenv command (which gives a list of all environment variables); The file env.out 2. the script you used to invoke

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: Cygwin

Hi Arjen: On 2015-04-17 13:24- Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan, I hope this tarball is complete. Yes it was and thanks! However, I still advise you to modify scripts.txt to do everything you did by hand to prepare the tarball to make it much easier for you to report the problem the next

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing reports

On 04/13/2015 06:29 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2015-04-13 13:51-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote: On 04/12/2015 08:23 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2015-04-11 21:05-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote: It worked fine without the Qt components. Is there an output file that I should send? Excellent news on the

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing reports

On 2015-04-13 13:51-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote: On 04/12/2015 08:23 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2015-04-11 21:05-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote: It worked fine without the Qt components. Is there an output file that I should send? Excellent news on the Lubuntu front. To answer your question,

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing reports

On 2015-04-13 14:11-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote: On 04/12/2015 08:23 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: Why do you think these Qt components fail in the tests, but work fine if they are run independently? What is the testing framework doing that is not being done from the command line? My guess is

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing reports

On 04/12/2015 08:23 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: Why do you think these Qt components fail in the tests, but work fine if they are run independently? What is the testing framework doing that is not being done from the command line? My guess is nothing explictly different is being done.

[Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing reports

On 2015-04-11 21:05-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote: It worked fine without the Qt components. Is there an output file that I should send? Excellent news on the Lubuntu front. To answer your question, please send a compressed tarball containing _all_ environment variables (you can capture a

Re: [Plplot-devel] Comprehensive testing: reports

Hi Alan, -Original Message- From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:14 PM To: Arjen Markus Cc: PLplot development list Subject: Comprehensive testing: reports Hi Arjen: Please review the part of

  1   2   >