* Per-Fredrik Pollnow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010726 09:40]:
> I have been looking around on the Inet to see if I could find anything
> about how I secure qmail pop3 service, but I don't have a ??? and I don't
> find a ???..
> I was wondering if anyone have some good ideas what to use or where I can
qmail-pop3d is far secure..but using it with inet is not recommended...use
qmail-pop3d with tcpserver..check the FAQ regarding this...
regards
dushyanth
> Hi,
>
> I have been looking around on the Inet to see if I could find anything
> about how I secure qmail pop3 service, but I don't have a ?
Hi,
I have been looking around on the Inet to see if I could find anything about how I
secure qmail pop3 service, but I don't have a ??? and I don't find a ???..
I was wondering if anyone have some good ideas what to use or where I can find some
information about securing qmail pop3 etc. (Right
David Talkington wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> John Wolford wrote:
>
> >qmail is running.
>
> Nope, not quite ...
>
> >If i check the ps listing, i see, in part:
> >[root@homer init.d]# ps -ef |grep qmail
> >root 29806 29805 1 Jun01 ?02:43:31 supervise qmail-p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
John Wolford wrote:
>qmail is running.
Nope, not quite ...
>If i check the ps listing, i see, in part:
>[root@homer init.d]# ps -ef |grep qmail
>root 29806 29805 1 Jun01 ?02:43:31 supervise qmail-pop3d
>root 29808 29805 0 Jun01 ?00:0
Hi guys,
I've installed the mdk (Mandrake) qmail rpm package on my Mandrake 7.2 box.
I've got it set up so that it's dealing with local mail quite nicely, and now
i'm ready to use fetchmail, which is also installed, to download mail from a
pop server.
qmail is running. If i check the ps listing,
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Constantine Koulis wrote:
> Dear sir.
>
> About local delivery i can send from root to local users but from local
> users to root nothing.As well i can send from local users and root to
> outside world.
Where is mail for your local users stored?
Do you check ~alias/ for
OTECTED]>
>CC: "qmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Newbie question-CJK
>Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:14:23 +0200
>
>Hi,
> >
> >
> > I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
> > When i open the unix-user i
Hi,
>
>
> I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
> When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
> /home/username.
> Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
this depends on your configuration, in most cases it is
hint: link /var/spool/mail/u
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Constantine Koulis wrote:
> I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
> When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
> /home/username.
> Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
Yes it is. I think you should first tell us
Hello all.
I am niebie to qmail but untill now i am happy.
I have some questions :
I can connect POP3 to the unix users but i cannot receive any email.
When i open the unix-user i made his home directory to be :
/home/username.
Is this the correct one for qmail?If not which is?
Another thing
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: newbie question
>Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:16:59 +0200
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Hi,
>
>please mail an exploit of /var/log/qmail/current
>and we'll see...
>
>Tom
Ian Truelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It passes all the internal tests, but I am not able to get anything from
> outside the local machine.
Okay. Lots of possible causes for that one.
> All I get when I try to email my machine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
> messages from the mail daemon whe
Hi,
please mail an exploit of /var/log/qmail/current
and we'll see...
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Truelsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 6:38 AM
Subject: newbie question
> I just installed qmail under Re
I just installed qmail under RedHat 7.1
It passes all the internal tests, but I am not able to get anything from
outside the local machine. I know I have not set something up properly, or
failed to set something up, but I can't figure out what it is that is wrong.
All I get when I try to email
, 2001 12:30 PM
To: Qmail Mailing List
Subject: Re: newbie question with concurrency remote
"Michael Geier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am running qmail on:
> RedHat 6.2
> 256 Mb Ram
>
>I set concurrency remote = 150...
>
>however, most of the
Michael Geier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I set concurrency remote = 150...
>
> however, most of the time, it seems like only a handful of remote processes
> are running, even though the queue backs up (right now, over 14000 msgs in
> queue and only 20 remote processes running)...
Most likel
"Michael Geier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am running qmail on:
> RedHat 6.2
> 256 Mb Ram
>
>I set concurrency remote = 150...
>
>however, most of the time, it seems like only a handful of remote processes
>are running, even though the queue backs up (right now, over 14000 msgs in
I am running qmail on:
RedHat 6.2
256 Mb Ram
I set concurrency remote = 150...
however, most of the time, it seems like only a handful of remote processes
are running, even though the queue backs up (right now, over 14000 msgs in
queue and only 20 remote processes running)...
An
thanks for the off-list advice...
i thought i'd let everyone know - building a sym-link from /var/spool/mail/username to
~(username)/Mailbox did the trick... popper must have been looking at the old
/var/spool i'll have to figure out a way to change popper and release those nasty
sym-links
i was running just regular, old, linux distribution flavored popper... must i switch?
- hogan
At 09:17 PM 4/26/2001 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:53:50PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
>> yep, popper's running...
>>
>> qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local
yep, popper's running...
qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local delivery and receipt
new messages are received in Pine just fine, but not by a remote UA
- hogan
At 07:42 PM 4/26/2001 +0100, Barry Hill wrote:
>Hi John,
>
>
>Thursday, April 26, 2001, 7:16:38 PM, you wrote:
>
>JH
John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have qmail all configured, tested and working in a local environment...
> when i send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is not downloaded by a
> third-party UA and is only available at the command line (pine)
If NFS is involved, make sure that t
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:53:50PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
> yep, popper's running...
>
> qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local delivery and receipt
What popper? qmail-pop3d only does Maildir.
Greetz, Peter.
Hi John,
Thursday, April 26, 2001, 7:16:38 PM, you wrote:
JH> i have qmail all configured, tested and working in a local
JH> environment... when i send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the
JH> message is not downloaded by a third-party UA and is only
JH> available at the command line (pine)
JH>
i have qmail all configured, tested and working in a local environment... when i send
a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is not downloaded by a third-party UA and is
only available at the command line (pine)
any ideas?
- hogan
___
Well have you tried to start tcpserver anyway?
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Johnson, Garrett wrote:
> Please forgive my ignorance. I'm trying to learn.
>
> I have set up a secondary Qmail server on RedHat 7.0 and it
> seems to have come up without a problem, but I'm having a
> hair-pulling time tryin
SFGH, Dean's Office, School of Medicine
-Original Message-
From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:39 PM
To: Johnson, Garrett
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Qmail newbie question
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:19:57PM -0800, Johnson
At 03:37 PM 3/19/2001, Gerrit Pape wrote:
did you read life with qmail? read it at www.lifewithqmail.org. Use the
init script from there and you shouldn't have any problems. :-)
~kurth
PS - to the list - yes, i know this is what I answer for every
answer...however almost every question can
Please forgive my ignorance. I'm trying to learn.
I have set up a secondary Qmail server on RedHat 7.0 and it
seems to have come up without a problem, but I'm having a
hair-pulling time trying to test if it works properly. It has
passed some basic tests. For instance I can use qmail-inject
to
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:19:57PM -0800, Johnson, Garrett wrote:
> This is what I get from ps -ef | grep qmail:
>
> root 503 502 0 Mar16 ?00:00:00 supervise qmail-send
> root 505 502 1 Mar16 ?00:54:39 supervise qmail-smtpd
> qmaill 507 504 0 Mar16 ?
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:19:57PM -0800, Johnson, Garrett wrote:
> Why isn't tcpserver running (keeping in mind that it isn't passing any email
> right now)? Something more disturbing is that when I run mconnect without
> arguments I get:
>
> tcpclient: unable to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 25: c
Virginia Chism <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A Frontpage client wants to publish a form to be received on my server
> addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and relayed (forwarded/redirected) to her
> personal email address which is not on my server.
[...]
> Now I have been told that I need to add herdo
My server is a UNIX box with BSDI 4.0, Apache, Qmail, and Frontpage. My
BSDI and QMail were set up by someone else (no longer with us) and I am
pretty much a newbie in this arena
A Frontpage client wants to publish a form to be received on my server
addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and relayed (fo
: "Roger Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 5:01 AM
Subject: Newbie question
> Roger Arnold wrote:
>
> How do you make a users file using "qmail-pw2u" from your /etc/passwd
> file
Roger Arnold wrote:
How do you make a users file using "qmail-pw2u" from your /etc/passwd
file ?
If I execute /var/qmail/qmail-pw2u with no extensions I would have
thought that it would have created an assignments file from /etc/passwd,
however all that happens is that it goes into never-never l
,
-sridhar
-Original Message-
From: Greg Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 6:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: newbie question. please recommend solution
> Here is the thing: I DO NOT have a domain YET. SO in my
> /etc/hosts file, I added swar
> Here is the thing: I DO NOT have a domain YET. SO in my
> /etc/hosts file, I added swaru as my machine name. SInce I'm
> not part of any network (it's a system at which is soon going
> to be a web/mail server), I named my machine swaru (swami + guru :-).
I don't know anything about
I'm trying to make qmail under my solaris work.
I have solaris 2.8 running on Ultra-2.
Now here is scenario:
I got the q-mail smtpd working (not the way they say in the documentation -- but it
works).
Now I'm trying to set up virtual users. I want to use vmailmgr because of the web
interface +
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Charles Cazabon wrote:
CC>The mail transaction above is not an example of (unauthorized) relaying.
CC>By putting the domain in rcpthosts, you have told qmail-smtpd "I am willing
CC>to accept mail from anyone which has an envelope recipient of
CC>[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
CC>
CC>If
Dario Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CC>You're preventing connections to port 25 completely? CC>Please post the
> CC>contents of your smtp.rules file to be more clear on exactly CC>what you
> CC>are allowing/disallowing.
>
> the rule is :
>
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Okay, you're not deny
CC>You're preventing connections to port 25 completely?
CC>Please post the contents of your smtp.rules file to be more clear on exactly
CC>what you are allowing/disallowing.
the rule is :
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
CC>
CC>> If i try to do relaying from a host that is not allowed i get the messag
Dario Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for boring you, but i have this problem i cannot understand:
> At this point i have a tcpserver at the moment allowing
> connections only from localhost.
You're preventing connections to port 25 completely?
Please post the contents of your smtp.rules
Hello all.
Sorry for boring you, but i have this problem i cannot understand:
I configured qmail with tcpserver following the installation instructions
step by step.
At this point i have a tcpserver at the moment allowing
connections only from localhost.
Everything is working fine and i send and r
On 1 Dec 2000, Matt Brown wrote:
> The only problem with doing that is the clueful admins with clueless
> management who force everyone to use the Corporate Email Solution, ie
> Outlook. Not me right now, but it was me in my last job.
Agreed. At my last consulting job... it took over 3 weeks to
"Aaron L. Meehan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've said enough. Pretty close to adding a rule for *Outlook* and
> *Inernet Mail Service* (heh, "Service!") into my .procmailrc, though,
> for mails to this list, with the SNR getting so bad among you all.
The only problem with doing that is the
Scott D. Yelich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Was the issue about an MX pointing to a CNAME ever resolved?
Yes; it's verboten. If you do it, don't expect to receive 100% of the mail
people try to send to you.
Also; please start a new thread when posting a new question; your message
showed up
Just a recommendation..
Book Title: "Pragmatics of Human Communication"
Author: Paul Watzlawik a.o.
ISBN: 0393010090
and now back to work..
Anton Pirnat
Thus spake Barley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> And that they all talk sweepingly of "genetic superiority"? I thought I was
> the only one who noticed...
It was you who brought that term up.
Felix
Thus spake Markus Stumpf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> - who has the highest crime rate in "western civilation"
> - where it is forbidden to show naked breasts (you know the things you got
> your first meal from in your life) on TV, but it is prefectly ok
> to broadcast a detailed sequence of
* Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001130 20:23]:
> Isn't it funny, how *some* people that live in a country and a culture
> - that killed thousands of black people
[snip]
Yeah yeah yeah, at least *we* know that David Hasselhof is talentless.
/pg
--
Peter Green : Gospel Communications Netwo
Thus spake David Dyer-Bennet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > a. are too dumb to state their question properly
> > (this includes bad grammar, bad spelling, bad quoting and obnoxious
> > signatures)
> Remembering that English is not the first language for everybody; I
> make considerably mo
> > Hrm i thought Robin was a woman ;)
>
> You wouldn't believe how much money we made with that webcam...
> --
> Robin S. Socha http://socha.net/
hah! that owns! now smack your dad for the chick's name ;)
> Isn't it funny, how *some* people that live in a country and a culture
> - that killed thousands of black people
> - that killed thousands of red indians
> - that killed thousands of people with the atomic bomb
> - that killed thousands of people in Vietnam
You forgot the hundre
Am Donnerstag, 30. November 2000 22:21 schrieb Horacio:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > What about writing a rule for your mailer: if ( $sender =~ /.de$/ ) {
> > kill mail; }. Then you can happily read all the lusers bullshit
> > without being disturbed by us nazis tryin to get wo
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:21:40PM -0800, Barley wrote:
> > Isn't it interesting that Stumf, Leitner and Socha all come from Germany?
> > Just a coincidence, I suppose.
>
> And that they all talk sweepingly of "genetic superiority"? I thought I was
> the only one who noticed...
Isn't it funny, h
On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Henning Brauer wrote:
> What about writing a rule for your mailer: if ( $sender =~ /.de$/ ) {
> kill mail; }. Then you can happily read all the lusers bullshit
> without being disturbed by us nazis tryin to get world domination.
> Maybe you won't get the 3rd world war announc
From: Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Isn't it interesting that Stumf, Leitner and Socha all come from Germany?
>> Just a coincidence, I suppose.
>
>What about writing a rule for your mailer: if ( $sender =~ /.de$/ ) { kill
>mail; }. Then you can happily read all the lusers bullshit without
Quoting rmiddleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > > about interacting successfully with the 5 billion other
> > > > real-live people on the planet suited for survival in a
> > > > Darwinian sense?
> >
> > You wouldn't say that if you knew how many of us wanted to sleep
> > with him.
>
> Hrm i thou
> > > about interacting successfully with the 5 billion other real-live
people on
> > > the planet suited for survival in a Darwinian sense?
>
> You wouldn't say that if you knew how many of us wanted to sleep with him.
>
> --
> Kate
> http://www.katewerk.com
>
Hrm i thought Robin was a woman ;)
Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2000 00:54 schrieb asantos:
> Isn't it interesting that Stumf, Leitner and Socha all come from Germany?
> Just a coincidence, I suppose.
What about writing a rule for your mailer: if ( $sender =~ /.de$/ ) { kill
mail; }. Then you can happily read all the lusers bullshit
Was the issue about an MX pointing to a CNAME ever resolved?
Scott
Barley wrote:
> And that they all talk sweepingly of "genetic superiority"? I thought I
was
> the only one who noticed...
Let's see, if USENET history is any indication, flame wars usually die down
the moment people start calling each other Nazis. Glad to see this one's
almost over.
By the way,
Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 30 November 2000 at 21:27:57 +0100
> Thus spake Dave Sill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I'm not a big fan of newbie smackdowns, though a repeat offendor might
> > warrant one. I think newbies generally respond better to reward than
> > punishment. E.g
Barley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 30 November 2000 at 11:30:46 -0800
> > But if you come here, post moronic questions, get beaten for it, and
> > then have the audacity to come back and whine publicly, then you are the
> > most pathetic creature on Earth and deserve to die slowly and painful
> Isn't it interesting that Stumf, Leitner and Socha all come from Germany?
> Just a coincidence, I suppose.
And that they all talk sweepingly of "genetic superiority"? I thought I was
the only one who noticed...
>
> 'nough said.
>
> Armando
>
>
>
>
>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 09:27:57PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Thus spake Dave Sill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I'm not a big fan of newbie smackdowns, though a repeat offendor might
> > warrant one. I think newbies generally respond better to reward than
> > punishment. E.g., instead of:
>
>
From: Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>STOP THIS BULLSHIT. NOW! IT'S ALREADY MORE THAN ENOUGH.
"...a dying culture invariably exhibits personal rudeness. Bad manners. Lack
of consideration for others in minor matters. A loss of politeness, of
gentle manners, is more significant than a riot.
T
> Thus spake Barley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > You mentioned Darwinism in a former post, Robin. How exactly is an angry
> > geek who knows a whole lot about electronic boxes, but less than nothing
> > about interacting successfully with the 5 billion other real-live people on
> > the planet suite
Am Donnerstag, 30. November 2000 21:55 schrieb Barley:
> You see, you, like Felix, are a rude person who
> enjoys trashing newbies. You were the first person to get incredibly nasty
> about newbies yesterday, then that joker Robin...now this Felix character.
> It seem to me that you angry types fo
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 12:55:33PM -0800, Barley wrote:
> I think you're worng.
STOP THIS BULLSHIT. NOW! IT'S ALREADY MORE THAN ENOUGH.
And if you think you must continue, take it to private mail.
\Maex
how previous newbies are chastised by
definition.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron L. Meehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question)
Quoting John W. Lemons III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I&#x
Thus spake Barley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Man, this Robin character is nuts. Coder-superiority syndrome big time. Why
> is it that tech geeks are so sure that their field of knowledge is the only
> one that indicates general intelligence?
Hahaha, you idiot can't even be bothered to use a search en
Quoting John W. Lemons III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've seen this over and over and over. Someone joins the list, probably
> because they are having problems (the same reason I joined), posts a
> question
Back in the day, it was prudent and _neccessary_ to do thorough
checking of the forum's arch
"Barley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I cannot get over this attitude. Can it really be that the majority of the
>qmail community feels like old Felix here?
If I say "yes" can we kill this thread?
-Dave
> Am Donnerstag, 30. November 2000 20:30 schrieb Barley:
> > > But if you come here, post moronic questions, get beaten for it, and
> > > then have the audacity to come back and whine publicly, then you are
the
> > > most pathetic creature on Earth and deserve to die slowly and
painfully.
> > >
> How exactly is my MUA broken?
Your MTA is not so broken that it could not be fixed if you actually
understood what you are doing. Robin chose to be more polite to you
than you are to us, so he rather wrote that it's your MUA's fault.
> Telling someone to RTFM would be helpful, if the manual b
Thus spake Dave Sill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm not a big fan of newbie smackdowns, though a repeat offendor might
> warrant one. I think newbies generally respond better to reward than
> punishment. E.g., instead of:
This is a question that I have asked numerous times and I never got a
good resp
Am Donnerstag, 30. November 2000 20:30 schrieb Barley:
> > But if you come here, post moronic questions, get beaten for it, and
> > then have the audacity to come back and whine publicly, then you are the
> > most pathetic creature on Earth and deserve to die slowly and painfully.
> > May the flie
> But if you come here, post moronic questions, get beaten for it, and
> then have the audacity to come back and whine publicly, then you are the
> most pathetic creature on Earth and deserve to die slowly and painfully.
> May the flies of a dozen dead camels' asses rest in your armpits!
I cannot
> I may be out of line here.
You are.
You post off-topic bullshit to a mailing list about qmail.
Oh, and you don't even have the decency to comply to the
well-established quoting standards when quoting email from others.
This is not a "I am willing to help dumb idiots" mailing list.
This is mor
From: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Actually, XEmacs is as much of an operating system--probably even
>moreso--than early versions of Windows.
Me, I'd say that neither is an operating system ;)
Anyway, I think that a good rule of thumb to qualify a software piece as a
operating system is "does
Louis Mushandu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fits qmail installation and all was fine until I tried to send email to
> > the box. It produces the following error message
And wrote it twice. Woohoo. Hint: if no one replies to your question the
first time you post it, posting exactly the sam
"asantos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Or that XEmacs is not an operating system.
Actually, XEmacs is as much of an operating system--probably even
moreso--than early versions of Windows.
-Dave
>
> Doesn't Outlook have filtering capabilities? Perhaps you could figure out
> how to just filter mail from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> into the bit bucket; that
> should basically take care of the problem, eh?
But where would the *fun* be then. I haven't had so much to laugh, for a
quite a while now.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy KKS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jamin Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question)
- Original Message -
From: "Jamin Collins"
>> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:13:18 -0100,
>> "asantos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
A> Robin's no geek. He's just ...
Are you sure? This picture plus the signature makes me wonder...
http://socha.net/Gnus/screenshots/mime.html
--
Karl Vogel<[EMAIL PROT
Andy Bradford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> - Be brief without being overly terse. When replying to
> a message,
> include enough original material to be understood but
> no more. It
> is extremely bad form to simply reply to a message by including
> all the previou
Thus said Jamin Collins on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:45:04 CST:
> > * 6 attribution lines
>
> Don't believe this is a requirement or violation of any RFC. If it is,
> which one?
>
> > * No citation leader
>
> Once again. Don't believe this is a requirement or violation of any RFC. If
> it is, whi
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2000 21:17 schrieb Louis Mushandu:
> locals
>
> mail.wonder.com:mcuser01
> wonder.com
>
> virtualdomains
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
You mixed two files here. In locals just list every domain you are delivering
myil locally for, on per line. in virtualdomains the mapping t
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2000 19:01 schrieb Barley:
> To Mr. Brauer, who seems on a quest to post nothing but flames here, we
> realize that no one is paid staff here. But you flaming everyone who posts
> doesn't help a thing.
You should reread my mails. Then you would notice i gave somehow det
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2000 17:22 schrieb Jamin Collins:
> There is no need to refer to his posting as "such nonsense".
Calling me an asshole on one hand (this weren't his words, it's just my
conclusion) and asking me for help off-list does not fit.
> Additionally,
> there is no call/need
"Robin S. Socha" wrote:
> Indeed. Tell me, Jamin, does your inflatable sheep talk? If so, do you
> wait for it to ask you for a fag, then repeat everything it said during
> intercourse (including the funny noises your mother and the new neighbour
> were making as well as the TV) and then ask if
Thus said "asantos" on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:13:18 -0100:
> For someone with such a doubtfull sense of humour as he shows to have
> welcoming IE users the way he does at http://socha.net/, he seems to be
> inordinately proud of listing among his "computer skills" Microsoft Office.
Bah! That's a l
Louis Theran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Really? Is this a digression because you've already contacted LWQ's
> author with suggestions? Have you posted anything to this list about
> the specific problems you had with INSTALL?
No to both, because I have not yet completed my configurati
Such a list would pobably be ignored by the people that can really help. And
sometimes the stupid questions aren't from newbies, they are from genuinely
stupid lackwits like me.
Anyway RTFM is usually good advice. Sometimes we really are lazy or busy
setting up all kinds of crap on our systems an
We old timers used to consider it rude to discuss anything but
technical issues on a technical mailing list. If someone had a problem
with someones manner of expression, or personality, they took it off
list. Please do so in the future.
sdb
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Louis Mushandu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried to send email to the box. It produces the following error message
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a
> best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't
From: Louis Mushandu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,
>it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6)
>
>I have done rtfm bit, hones,t but now I seem to be going round in circles.
Follow the thread starting at
: List Courtesy (was Newbie question)
>
>
> Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > You called the docs "highly inadequate", not "a little lacking when it
> > comes to helping someone completely new to qmail". In my
> > book, calling
> >
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
