I'm switching my qmail machine to use daemontools instead of inetd to start.
I installed the unnoficial debian packages for daemontools and ucspi-tcp.
svcscan doesn't seem to be starting automatically at boot - do people usually
create an init script to start this at boot?
i'm pretty sure that's
I finally found a few spare moments to update LWQ. Sigh. Sorry it took so
long.
There are lots of minor changes, of course, but also a few bigger ones:
1) Services go under /service
2) "qmail" script is now "qmailctl"
3) Improved qmail-pop3d installation instructions
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 04:03:52PM -0700, Will Yadley wrote:
>I'm switching my qmail machine to use daemontools instead of inetd to start.
>I installed the unnoficial debian packages for daemontools and ucspi-tcp.
>svcscan doesn't seem to be starting automatically at boot - do people usually
>crea
Does anyone have an example of how to use splogger with daemontools (and how
to remove the multilog stuff)? leaving 'splooger qmail' at the end of the
/var/qmail/rc file was making qmail-send start an extra process at the
beginning.
-w
Hi Dave,
I have used your script in lwq to install qmail
and from what I see it is working quite well
I am still setting it up on a test-server
and have not yet connected it to the net
I am in the process of setting up a freemail domain and
I am in the situation that is described in Serialmail
hi,
i've tryed to installed qmail 1.03
according "Life with qmail"
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html
instructions on FreeBSD4.0, but
script
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
reporting errors:
bash-2.03# /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
softlimit: usage: softlimit [-a allbytes] [-c co
e user ids since OpenBSD is
not mentioned at all in INSTALL.ids (I also asked on this list and got
helpful advice - thanks guys)
Ok on to my lamer newbie question:
Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything is
started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to
I looked at the new version of "Life with qmail" for the first time today,
so forgive me if this is a little late. I didn't see anything in the
archive to suggest it had already been talked aobut.
Since the new LWQ sets up svscan to run independently of the qmail control
script,
Hi all.
i am instaling for the 20th time the LINUX 7.0 +qmail+courier-imap+vmailmgr
but dont want to make mistakes again so i followed the maildirmake HOWTO
that is in the /doc/ directory but i have a question.
In the LWQ is says the following :
Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:13:40PM -0700, Will Yadley wrote:
> Does anyone have an example of how to use splogger with daemontools (and how
> to remove the multilog stuff)? leaving 'splooger qmail' at the end of the
> /var/qmail/rc file was making qmail-send start an extra process at the
> beginn
"Jacob (Mettavihari)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Could you kindly suggest a way of making
>serialmail work with your script
>
>the part of your script that starts up qmail-smtpd
>--
>echo -n " qmail-smtpd"
>supervise /var/supervise/qmail/s
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
> Just change /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper from:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> ulimit -d 1024
> exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd ${1+"$@"}
>
> to:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> ulimit -d 1024
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd ${1+"$@"}
> cd /var/qmail/autoturn
> exec setlock -n
"Jacob (Mettavihari)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thank you very much.
You're welcome.
>From faq 5.3.
>
>If you have tcpserver installed, skip the inetd step, and set up (on two
>lines)
>
> tcpserver 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup YOURHOST \
> /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bi
While I was writing LWQ, I had several people ask if they could
translate it. I suggested they wait until version 1.0. I never heard
back from any of them.
I'd really like to get some translations going, so if you're
interested, please let me know. I'll help any way I can.
I di
Hi,
I installed qmail as described in LWQ. As I try to evaluate the logs
with qmail analog I run into trouble because multilog does not have the
timestamps needed by qmailanalog. Can I just replace any multilog entry
with splogger or is this no good idea? Can I create the timestamps in
multilog
Disclaimer: I don't use FreeBSD.
t_oo wrote:
> i've tryed to installed qmail 1.03 according "Life with qmail"
> http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html instructions on FreeBSD4.0, but
script
> /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run reporting errors:
>
> bash-2.03# /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Rick Updegrove wrote:
> Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything is
> started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
I recently set up an openbsd 2.8 box LWQ-style. The 'qmail'
* Kris Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rick Updegrove wrote:
>> Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems
>> everything is started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I
>> to follow LWQ?
> I may be way off base here, having ne
On 21.02.2001 20:04 + Kris Kelley wrote:
> Rick Updegrove wrote:
> > Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems
> everything
> is
> > started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
>
> I may be way off base here, hav
Rick Updegrove wrote:
> Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything
is
> started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
I may be way off base here, having never used OpenBSD, but couldn't you
create the LWQ qmail start-up scrip
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Rick Updegrove wrote:
> Since I do not have a init.d directory in OpenBSD and it seems everything is
> started from rc.conf and rc.local in OpenBSD how am I to follow LWQ?
The lack of the complicated sysv-style init and its dependencies is
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:24:04AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Just enter
> >
> >PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
> >svscan /service &
> >
> >in your /etc/rc.local
>
> Since we're talking
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just enter
>
>PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
>svscan /service &
>
>in your /etc/rc.local
Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
/var/qmail/supervise &". But putting:
/usr/local/sbin/q
* Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 09:36]:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:24:04AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> > Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
> > /var/qmail/supervise &". But putting:
> >
> > /usr/local/
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sorry Dave, but having such a beast like the sysv-init-script for qmail on
>OpenBSD is definetly not the correct approach. Thats against any BSD
>concept, especially the OpenBSD concept.
Nonsense. The "qmail" script from L
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
going to stop just because some upstart free OS's want to impose their
idea of the One True Filesystem Hierarc
* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 10:41]:
> "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
> I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
> going to stop just because some upstart free OS's wan
ecially the OpenBSD concept.
> Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
> init script mechanism, but it's also perfectly compatible with BSD and
> generally useful on all UNIX flavors as a qmail control
> interface. Maybe I should rename it qma
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 10:41]:
>> "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
>> I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
>> go
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
>>
>> Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
>> init script mechanism, but it's also perfectly compatible with BSD and
&g
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> man hier should be a lot older than OpenBSD or whatever. I mean, really.
Unix-88 said that this sort of non-vendor provided stuff should go in
/opt/{vendor}/, but SunOS 4.1.x chose not to do that and few others do
even now. (SunOS 4's HIER(7) sugges
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> >>
> >> Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the Syst
gt; What are the *BSD-approved equivalents for the above commands?
>
>svc -d /service/qmail-* and co. In general you are looking up PIDs and send
>them signals in BSD-world, not calling complex scripts.
"Complex scripts"? You think think the LWQ qmail script is complex?
Give me a b
tl start"?
/usr/sbin/httpd
> >> How is having a simple control interface like:
> >[...]
> >> against "keep it simple"?
> >> What are the *BSD-approved equivalents for the above commands?
> >
> >svc -d /service/qmail-* and co. In general you are looki
Hello :)
I just setup qmail using Life with qmail, and everything seems to be
working just fine. But I wanted to use POP3 with it, and somehow trying to
add pop3d to tcpserver just isn't working.
I'm still sort of new to he *nix world. Btw, I'm using FreeBSD 4.2, if it
matters. Anyway, thi
I installed qmail in accordance with lwq (dated 13 June 2001).
I am gone to chapter 2 Installation, and did not go to chapter 3
Configuratin yet.
Tried to stop qmail, but it does not stop by saying
qmail-send: no file
qmail-smtp: no file
But I have them in /service linked to /var/qmail
> Dave can probably give a more detailed answer to this, but you don't
> symbolicly link the directories into /service until you're ready to run
them.
> And even then, svscan won't start them until you do a svc -u (or -o)
> /service/servicename .
Everything I've read about svscan says that on
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dave can probably give a more detailed answer to this, but you don't
>symbolicly link the directories into /service until you're ready to run them.
That's not how LWQ's qmailctl works. The links in /service are
permanent.
>And even then, svscan won't
Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >And even then, svscan won't start them until you do a svc -u (or -o)
> >/service/servicename .
>
> Sure it will, unless there's a "down" file.
Of course, I received several corrections immediately after sending this. Mea
culpa.
Charles
--
-
I wrote:
> > Since the new LWQ sets up svscan to run independently of the qmail
control
> > script, would it not be a wise idea to include a "down" file in each
> > supervise directory, so that qmail and any other services would not
start
> > up when svscan is r
Constantine Koulis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the LWQ is says the following :
>
> Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir mailboxes, but it can't
> create them. Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake
> program that comes with qmail. E.
At 6:24 PM +0300 7/3/01, Constantine Koulis wrote:
>THAT MEANS THAT FOR EVERY VIRTUAL USER I HAVE TO DO MAILDIRMAKE
>and what is SKELETON?
Not at all. It means you have to create a Maildir in /etc/skel, which
is the "reference" directory for useradd to create new user
directories. Then, ev
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 06:24:42PM +0300, Constantine Koulis wrote:
[...]
> Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir mailboxes, but it can't create
> them. Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake program that
> comes with qmail. E.g., "maildirmake ~/Maildir". Be sure to r
>Hi Constantine,
>... Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake program that
>comes with qmail. E.g., "maildirmake ~/Maildir".
>...
>
>THAT MEANS THAT FOR EVERY VIRTUAL USER I HAVE TO DO MAILDIRMAKE
>and what is SKELETON?
no why. I have installed qmail with real life users
Hello all, I am new to qmail. I am running
Slackware 7.1 and trying to setup qmail using the instructions in LWQ. I get
to the following part and I am
stuck:#Create the script using
your editor or by downloading it with your web browser, then install it into
Thus said Dave Sill on Thu, 18 Nov 1999 15:43:43 EST:
> While I was writing LWQ, I had several people ask if they could
> translate it. I suggested they wait until version 1.0. I never heard
> back from any of them.
Looks like you'll be stuck using babelfish... :)
Andy
--
I'm also interested in a german version. So Markus and Roland: contact me.
CU
Holger
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 18. November 1999 21:44
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: LWQ translators wan
if one more hand for german translation is needed, let me know...
--
Alexander Jernejcic, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 03:43:43PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> While I was writing LWQ, I had several people ask if they could
> translate it. I suggested they wait until version 1.0. I never heard
> back from any of them.
>
> I'd really like to get some translations
> > While I was writing LWQ, I had several people ask if they could
> > translate it. I suggested they wait until version 1.0. I never heard
> > back from any of them.
> >
> > I'd really like to get some translations going, so if you're
> > inter
dd wrote:
> > > I'd really like to get some translations going, so if you're
> > > interested, please let me know. I'll help any way I can.
> >
> > I can take the portuguese translation...
>
> errm and i can do my best for a turkish translation...
QMAIL KISS YOU!!11!!
--Steve(sorry couldn't res
> > errm and i can do my best for a turkish translation...
>
> QMAIL KISS YOU!!11!!
eheh no way, that guy's totally dumb, you can't even compare him to
me man. some say he's actually a very smart person who made an extra lame
page and got millions of hits and became world-wide famous this way.
Clemens Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I installed qmail as described in LWQ. As I try to evaluate the logs
>with qmail analog I run into trouble because multilog does not have the
>timestamps needed by qmailanalog. Can I just replace any multilog entry
>with splogger
Hi all...
Does anyone use qmail-smtp-auth ?
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
Just wondering if it's safe to start the smtpd as requested by INSTALL in
qmail-smtp-auth.
LWQ starts smtpd differently, I don't want to upset the LWQ installation.
Can anyone offer any s
Neafevoc K. Marindale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just setup qmail using Life with qmail, and everything seems to be
> working just fine. But I wanted to use POP3 with it, and somehow trying to
> add pop3d to tcpserver just isn't working.
What "doesn't work"? What error messages do you
e service for qmail-pop3.
See:
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/8225/fid/223
For instructions on setting up qmail-pop3d the LWQ way.
-Dave
2001, YOON, Joo-Yung wrote:
> I installed qmail in accordance with lwq (dated 13 June 2001).
> I am gone to chapter 2 Installation, and did not go to chapter 3
> Configuratin yet.
>
> Tried to stop qmail, but it does not stop by saying
> qmail-send: no file
> qmail-smtp: no f
"YOON, Joo-Yung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now the qmail is running, and I attach the ps output for your information.
Please include /service on the commandline of svscan (inittab?). You
are running svscan on the root directory because you didn't give
parameters.
Change that and look at it
"Larry Masters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new to qmail. I am running Slackware 7.1 and trying to setup
>qmail using the instructions in LWQ. I get to the following part and
>I am stuck:
>
>#
>
>Create the script u
Hi, I am using the Life with qmail document and I have question with the start up
script. "setuser" is not found when I execute the script. Where can I find this
command?
I able to start qmail using /var/qmail/rc, however when I use the
"/usr/local/sbin/qmail stat". I have the following erro
I just discovered that if you are using the LWQ qmail rc script with
RHL 6.1, you need to add the following lines:
to the "start" section:
touch /var/lock/subsys/qmail
to the "stop" section:
rm -f /var/lock/subsys/qmail
Otherwise, qmail will not be properly shut down
Hi,
I want to evaluate the logs that are generated within ma LWQ-Setup. I am
not really sure which log directory contains what.
/var/loq/qmail
/var/log/qmail/smtpd
As one might guess the smtpd directory might contain any message that
enters or leaves the mailserver via smtp, right? But what is
List,
I recently decided to move my qmail-pop3d process out of inetd on my
RedHat 6.2 machine and under the control of daemontools like the rest of my
qmail processes. I installed semi-following LWQ, and making other changes
as I went. Daemontools and ucspi-tcp were installed from RPMs (if
On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 09:36:16AM -0700, Matthew Kaing wrote:
> Hi, I am using the Life with qmail document and I have question with the start up
>script. "setuser" is not found when I execute the script. Where can I find this
>command?
>
> I able to start qmail using /var/qmail/rc, however
>[root@ufo init.d]#
>
>Is the message above normal?
Yeah, if you don't have daemontools 0.53 installed. :-)
-Dave, who's beginning to think it's time to move LWQ to daemontools 0.61
o.k, I installed qmail 1.03+patches, courier imap 0.32 and vmailmgr 0.96.6
according to linux.org's HOWTO.
When it comes to Putting it all together (section 3)
it refers me to www.qmail.org to get configuration documentation. I then
used Life With Qmail to get qmail running.
It (LWQ) deta
Clemens Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I want to generate statistics and I use only the
> logs in /var/log/qmail (and I skip the ones in the smtpd subdir) do I
> then catch any mail that comes to/leaves/passes my server?
Yes. The smtpd logs record only the arrival of messages through
q
Clemens Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I want to evaluate the logs that are generated within ma LWQ-Setup. I am
>not really sure which log directory contains what.
>
>/var/loq/qmail
>/var/log/qmail/smtpd
>
>As one might guess the smtpd directory might contain
I saw this too, put "exec" before tcpserver
- Original Message -
From: "Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 9:38 PM
Subject: LWQ Init Script/qmail-pop3d
> List,
> I recently decided to move my
PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: LWQ Init Script/qmail-pop3d
> I saw this too, put "exec" before tcpserver
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAI
Thanks Kris Kelly! (Re: qpop3 keeps alive!)
- Original Message -
From: "Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: LWQ Init Script/qmail-pop3d
> Man, you just made my day
I am installing qmail via Davids LWQ and was not able to find the
daemontools-0.53 package at the koobera.math.uic.edu ftp site. Is this
critical and if so where can I find it now.
Thanks in advance...
-frank
"Gary Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It (LWQ) details a script to start qmail automatically and to allow it to be
>stopped gently.
>the problem is when I try to start qmail from the script
>(/etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail start) I get this error:
>
>svscan: warnin
>No, the file it's talking about is "supervise". What does:
>
> ls -l /usr/local/bin/supervise
>
>say?
It says:
ls: /usr/local/bin/supervise: No such file or directory
So where can I find supervise?
_
Get Your Private, Fr
"Gary Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It says:
>
>ls: /usr/local/bin/supervise: No such file or directory
>
>So where can I find supervise?
It's part of daemontools, the package that contains svscan. You've
obviously installed daemontools, but something must have gone wrong.
-Dave
>Gary Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Daemontools!!
>http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
I have daemontools installed from an rpm and supervise is in /usr/bin
instaed of /usr/local/bin
once again, a question, how do I get the script to recognise this as
/usr/bin is mentioned as being on the path
"Gary Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have daemontools installed from an rpm and supervise is in /usr/bin
>instaed of /usr/local/bin
That voids your LWQ warranty. Sorry.
>once again, a question, how do I get the script to recognise this as
>/usr/bin is me
All,
So I'm installing qmail on my RedHat 6 distrubution a la the "Life with
qmail" document, and its going great (I've been doing a little each day all
week) until section 2.8.2 when I am suppposed to type "/usr/local/sbin/qmail
cdb"
Well, I do this, and I get "bash: /usr/local/sbin/qmail: No s
On 9/23/99 at 3:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Franklin A Hays)
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had the thought:
> I am installing qmail via Davids LWQ and was not able to find the
> daemontools-0.53 package at the koobera.math.uic.edu ftp site. Is this
> critical and if so where can I find it now.
&g
It's at ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/daemontools/daemontools-0.53.tar.gz
You will most likely need to use an FTP tool instead of a web browser to
see it.
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Franklin A Hays wrote:
>
> I am installing qmail via Davids LWQ and was not able to find the
> da
Patrick Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>daemontools have moved up a version. Since LWQ is written for use
>with 0.53 and I found it easier to grab an rpm of daeomontools, but
>still do the regular qmail source install.
Daemontools 0.53 is still available from koobera using
"Timothy L. Mayo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's at ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/daemontools/daemontools-0.53.tar.gz
>
>You will most likely need to use an FTP tool instead of a web browser to
>see it.
No, I've downloaded it with IE 5 and Navigator 4.61. Some browsers
have trouble navigating
Ok, I've been following the steps in LWQ word by word and editing where
necessary for my system (uname -a: FreeBSD marilyn.cmgww.com 3.4-RELEASE
FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE #1: Fri Feb 18 17:54:53 EST 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/MARILYN i386).
My problem is when I run 'qmail
when I try to run qmail start after installing (the lwq way)
I get a lot of errors:
multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied
so I am assuming that a log directory hasnt got the right permissions or
ownership, my /var/log/qmail directory is owned by qmaill, so
.
(I am using "LWQ" and "running qmail", by Rich Blum, as guides and used the
CD that comes with "running qmail" to install FreeBSD 4.0 and the qmail.)
For a while, I had things running, but delivery to the local mailboxes was
using the mbox as the local delivery d
At 18:42 01/07/00 +0200, Steffan Hoeke wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 12:12:26PM +0100, Lou Hevly wrote:
>> Sorry to ask so basic a question, but after installing qmail successfully
>> following LWQ, I'm unable to find my log file. `ps` shows that multilog is >> bei
Warren 'Llama' Ernst wrote:
>
> All,
>
> So I'm installing qmail on my RedHat 6 distrubution a la the "Life with
> qmail" document, and its going great (I've been doing a little each day all
> week) until section 2.8.2 when I am suppposed to type "/usr/local/sbin/qmail
> cdb"
>
> Well, I do thi
"Bryan J. Ischo" wrote:
> Warr,
>
> Check the top line of the qmail file. It will name a program to be run
> to process the qmail script. Check to make sure that this program
> exists on your
> system and is runnable.
>
> For example, if the program is named as:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> Make sure t
Warren 'Llama' Ernst wrote:
> All,
>
> So I'm installing qmail on my RedHat 6 distrubution a la the "Life with
> qmail" document, and its going great (I've been doing a little each day all
> week) until section 2.8.2 when I am suppposed to type "/usr/local/sbin/qmail
> cdb"
>
> Well, I do this, a
"Warren 'Llama' Ernst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So I'm installing qmail on my RedHat 6 distrubution a la the "Life with
>qmail" document, and its going great (I've been doing a little each day all
>week) until section 2.8.2 when I am suppposed to type "/usr/local/sbin/qmail
>cdb"
>
>Well, I do
Aled Treharne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok, I've been following the steps in LWQ word by word and editing where
>necessary for my system (uname -a: FreeBSD marilyn.cmgww.com 3.4-RELEASE
>FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE #1: Fri Feb 18 17:54:53 EST 2000
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Ok, I've been following the steps in LWQ word by word and editing where
> >necessary for my system (uname -a: FreeBSD marilyn.cmgww.com 3.4-RELEASE
> >FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE #1: Fri Feb 18 17:54:53 EST 2000
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys
"Neil Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>when I try to run qmail start after installing (the lwq way)
>
>I get a lot of errors:
>
>multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied
>
>
>
>so I am assuming that a log directory ha
SF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I am using "LWQ" and "running qmail", by Rich Blum, as guides and used the
> CD that comes with "running qmail" to install FreeBSD 4.0 and the qmail.)
"Running qmail" has not received a very warm response f
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 11:18:09AM -0600, SF wrote:
> For a while, I had things running, but delivery to the local mailboxes was
> using the mbox as the local delivery destination, instead of Maildir - which
> I wanted to change it to, so I could use pop3d. I modified the rc file
> (which in Free
Hello,
I just attempted to install qmail on a FreeBSD 4 box following LWQ
(which did always work for my SuSE Linux boxes). I installed qmail,
daemontools and ucspi-tcp using the respective ports but when I try
root@beta 14:20:58 /etc/init.d # qmail start # (I put it there as I couldn't
On Wed 2000-04-26 (14:21), Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> I just attempted to install qmail on a FreeBSD 4 box following LWQ
> (which did always work for my SuSE Linux boxes). I installed qmail,
> daemontools and ucspi-tcp using the respective ports but when I try
>
> root@beta 14:20
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
[...] svscan: No such file or directory
If you install daemontools according to the instructions,
svscan will be in /usr/local/bin, or where you specified it to be (conf-home).
> [...] ignoring all advice
> that FreeBSD people are giving)?
If you i
On Wed 2000-04-26 (17:35), Mads E Eilertsen wrote:
> I've installed daemontools a couple of times now, on FreeBSD and other
> platforms, and never felt any need for a package. What are the
> specific arguments against doing this on FreeBSD?
Like on most other platforms - it makes it harder for s
I wrote:
> If you're unable to wait a day or two, it won't kill you if you install
> it manually. I should get around to upgrading it tomorrow, if not in
> the next few hours.
Ok, it took 34 hours, since I had to find out about repository copies.
It should work now.
Neil
--
Neil Blakey-Milner
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
