John Chapman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question
>
> >
> > even though I didn't had very pleasant experience with inter7 I still
> &g
>
> even though I didn't had very pleasant experience with inter7 I still
> get trying to help all of people who search their mailing list and who
> send me e-mails because of those bugs ( just trying to follow open
> source license) ..
>
> so robin so you can go and ... yourself
Well now. I
: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 04:15:49AM -0400, alexus wrote:
>
> Dear alexus,
>
> > let me just end my lines with
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 04:15:49AM -0400, alexus wrote:
Dear alexus,
> let me just end my lines with that even though looks like inter7 is
> bunch of i'm sure they are still a good people:)
Let me begin my assessment of your ad hominem attack with an exec
summary: you suck.
Having pro
gh looks like inter7 is bunch of i'm
sure they are still a good people:)
- Original Message -
From: "Dushyanth Harinath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question
> a perfe
ducts.. it seems to
> us that either they don't know nothing about those products themselves
> or else I don't know...
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
commercial support for one of their products.. it seems to us that either
they don't know nothing about those products themselves or else I don't
know...
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTE
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:28:16PM -0400, alexus wrote:
> can someone suggest me place where to look how to make qmail smtp auth?
look at http://www.qmail.org
>
> i was able to do it via vpopmail but i'm sure there is more "native" way:)
what do you mean with that ?
>
can someone suggest me place where to look how to make qmail smtp auth?
i was able to do it via vpopmail but i'm sure there is more "native" way:)
- Original Message -
From: "Keary Suska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail List" <[EMAIL PRO
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 03:07:38PM -0600, Keary Suska wrote:
> Does anyone have comments, recommendations, or warnings over the various
> SMTP Auth patches available? I can't seem to find any hard information to
> compare them.
There are several patches available, the best is, i
Does anyone have comments, recommendations, or warnings over the various
SMTP Auth patches available? I can't seem to find any hard information to
compare them.
Keary Suska
Esoteritech, Inc.
"Leveraging Open Source for a better Internet"
> Hi,
>
> I've read all that I can find on the subject and tried to build this
> setup a few different ways with a few peoples patches and all with no
> luck.
>
> I built checkpassword .9 setup for MySQL... if I test it it works.
>
> I built qmail-smtpd with the patch to authenticate and call chec
Hi,
I've read all that I can find on the subject and tried to build this
setup a few different ways with a few peoples patches and all with no
luck.
I built checkpassword .9 setup for MySQL... if I test it it works.
I built qmail-smtpd with the patch to authenticate and call checkpassword.
Eric
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:36:49AM -0400, Joshua Nichols wrote:
> Well first, if you're using gnu patch (which you should be) that
> command is malformed.
Probably a typo, since there was obviously some data for patch to work on.
> If it weren't, I may guess "wrong -pnum".
No, the output clearl
I've already solved my problem. The file qmail-smtpd.patch was
damaged. I used a new file and it worked ok.
Thanks.
Andrés
> >
> > patch > qmail-smtpd.patch
> >
> > What might be happening
> >
Well first, if you're using gnu patch (which you should be) that command is
malformed. If it weren't, I may guess "wrong -pnum".
'man patch'
--joshua.
> Hi ,
> I have tried to install the Krzysztof Dabrowski 's SMTP-AUTH patch and
> when we execute the command:
>
> patch > qmail-smtpd.patch
>
> I get the following error list,
>
> patching file `qmail-smtpd.c'
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
> Hunk #2 F
Hi,
I installed YAQSAP (Yet Another qmail SMTP AUTH Patch)
from Eric M. Johnston, which works fine for me. But
now collegues told me that with smtp-auth passwords are
sent non-encrypted over the net. Does anyone of you has
experiences with smtp-auth and SSL? What exactly do I
have to configure
Hi,
does anyone have good tips on how to install
smtp-auth for qmail? I want to allow a few
clients with dynamic IP-adresses to relay
over my server. I tried out a few patches.
But it doesn't work correctly. I use Outlook
Express to test it. When I deactivate
"Server needs authen
At 02:48 PM 6/20/01, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
> Encourage your customers to use non-broken MUA.
I think in fact that Eudora is not broken here (although the human
factors engineering could be improved upon perhaps). The problem behind the
problem was given. Another way to ask the perceived pro
Jost Krieger wrote:
> > Encourage your customers to use non-broken MUA. Our company refuses to
> > support anything other than Outlook Express, Netscape Messenger, and our
> > own web-based e-mailing service. You might try that: promoting a
> > web-based e-mail service they can access FROM ANYWH
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:38:37PM +, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
> joc wrote:
>
> >There it is. any wise thoughts here?
> >
> > Thanks
> > John
>
> Encourage your customers to use non-broken MUA. Our company refuses to
> support anything other than Outlook Express, Netscape Messenger, an
joc wrote:
>There it is. any wise thoughts here?
>
> Thanks
> John
Encourage your customers to use non-broken MUA. Our company refuses to
support anything other than Outlook Express, Netscape Messenger, and our
own web-based e-mailing service. You might try that: promoting a
web-based e-m
Hello.
I received a fortune cookie today some here may like:
It is harder to ask the right questions than
to find answers for the wrong questions.
Lucky # 6,8,38,40,45
A perceived problem I am trying to solve is that sending mail from
eudora win 4.3 or 5.1 with AUTH enabled to a qmail serv
Hi, I need to install the Patch to use the authenticated SMTP. I'm thinking
of using version 0.26, but I have a doubt. Maybe you can help me. I would
need to know what happens if I don't deliver to the qmail-smtpd neither the
third nor the fourth argument. This is so because I would only use an
u
Hello,
I have been playing with qmail for a while now,
I have been using a pop before smtp (ugg) solution for remote users
I noticed in ports, a qmail-tls package (FreeBSD 4.3 system)
Last night, I installed this package on a mock-up server but have been
unable to
get it working with clie
I'm confused. I have a qmail server that I want to use as an outgoing
smtp server. It has Solaris 8 - qmail 1.03 patched with smtp_auth patch
version .30 and checkpasswd. I just need for sales guys to auth thru
the server. I don't want to be an open relay. I can't get either outlook
2000 or nets
I've seen that... For those that like Outlook, I recommend an ugly thing:
create 2 profiles for the same account :-/
The fist profile just receive (SMTP server: NOSERVER.NODOMAIN), and the
second - the default profile - just sends (POP3 server:
NOSERVER.NODOMAIN)...
I would appreciate if someone
hem.
Martin Gerardi offered the following solution on the vmailmgr list:
use Eric M. Johnston's smtp-auth patch and set checkvpw suid-root.
I have now idea how secure this is, even Bruce did not make any
promises.
Any comments if this is good or bad are highly appreciated.
bye
/ch
Hi all,
I host a lot of virtual domains but the Outlook cannot send after receive. I
was looking for some way to chenge this setting in the outlook but until now
no luck.
Is there a posibility to enable smtp authentication through the vmailmgr?
I have installed the version of qmail-smtpd.c w
Joshu=E9 Mart=EDn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But when I tried to apply the two patches to Qmail sources (f=
irst=20
>the TLS patch and then the AUTH), the second patch rejects parts of th=
e
>AUTH patch. I tried to apply manually the parts of the patch that
>were rejected, but the resul
were rejected, but the resultant qmail-smtp didn't allow authenticate
nor encript.
Anyone has applied the two patches correctly or can make Qmail
support TLS and SMTP AUTH?
Thanks.
Hi, All
I am using with vpopmail, sqwebmail,
and I wana my email system with smtp
authorazition.
then I get http://www.nimh.org/hacks/qmail-smtpd.c
to replace the original source in qmail,
and then complie, install .
and my auth run script is as following:
/usr
0
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: smtp auth problems
>
> but i don't have to make auth plain or something
> before i can mail. i just us
> 1. mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2. rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 3. data
>
> and send the message
>
> can anyone give me a hint, why the authentification isn't working?
Hello,
i'm quite a newbie to qmail
i just installed qmail with inetd configuratio using system accounts
as mail user. running qmail-pop3d for the pop access and courier-imap.
qmail-pop3d is using checkpassword for authentification and its
working fine.
know i wanted to install qmail
hello all, i use qmail with mysql support.
yesterday my smal mailserver was used to spawn, now i
need to implement one smtp auth, like pop before smtp (BUT
WITH MYSQL), or any other advices for smtp auth and/or
encryption that works with mysql ?
thanks4 your passion
mike
hi
i don't know perhaps i would better ask in a vpopmail-list but i think i'm
right here also so i'll ask... and please don't flame me ;-)
i've patched qmail with the smtp-auth patch of
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/smtp-auth/
and everything works fine (also with v
Hi all...
Does anyone use qmail-smtp-auth ?
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
Just wondering if it's safe to start the smtpd as requested by INSTALL in
qmail-smtp-auth.
LWQ starts smtpd differently, I don't want to upset the LWQ installation.
Can anyone offer any s
>I did have a problem with patching qmail-smtpd (I got a warning about a
>return type, see earlier e-mail on list) but I'm not sure if that's the
>problem.
>/etc/shadow is owned by user/group root.
the roots of your (and 90% of other people's problems) are 2
a) either your qmail-smtpd is not ab
John P. wrote:
> I wanted to avoid using the cmd5checkpw program as I didn't want to have
two
> sets of password files to update. Also I'm using Outlook Express so that
> means plaintext passwords only (?) - so I only put one argument on the
> qmail-smtpd line.
Regardless of your set-up, the patc
> Therefore, qmail-smtpd modified with the patch will require two
> "checkpassword" type arguments, one to handle simple passwords, the other
to
> handle CRAM-MD5.
>
> Dabrowski also wrote his own replacement for checkpassword, cmd5checkpw,
> specifically to handle the CRAM-MD5 scheme. However, t
John P. wrote:
> I have patched qmail-smtpd with Krzysztof Dabrowski's SMTP-AUTH patch and
> have changed the line in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run to end "..
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /bin/checkpassword /bin/true &2>&1" and have
been
> trying to
Hi All,
I have patched qmail-smtpd with Krzysztof Dabrowski's SMTP-AUTH patch and
have changed the line in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run to end "..
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /bin/checkpassword /bin/true &2>&1" and have been
trying to send e-mail from an IP add
Is it possible to run smtp-auth using the system password databse and
files?
As I read it you have to be running 'virtual users' with a separate
passwd file, I have done this on other boxes (not running smtp-auth) but
this system has real users with real shells and they just happen
Resolved the problem myself (finally ...):
Was a startup-skrip problem:
problematic:
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` (--> returns a number on my box)
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" -u
"$QMAILD
Hi
I have qmail 1.03 running with vpopmail.
I patched qmail-smtpd with esmtp-tls and smtp-auth.
When I run it "stand-alone" (not supervised) it works perfectly,
authentification via vpopmail-passwdfiles etc.
when I want to run it via svscan / supervise, I can't authenti
Hi,
I've authored YAQSAP (Yet Another qmail SMTP AUTH Patch) which is a bit
more DJBized than the others right now in that it uses DJB's libraries
exclusively. Functionally, it's not all that different from Krzysztof
Dabrowski's version except that it sets TCPREMOTEINFO
take a look at vchkpw from www.inter7.com
they keep a rules list based on the tcpserver rules list that gets an ip added
to it when a user pops their mail off, then removes it after a configurable
amount of time.
MHP
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001, Alexander Meis (simmail] wrote:
Hi...
is there a possibil
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:45:32PM +0100, Alexander Meis (simmail] wrote:
> Hi...
>
> is there a possibility with qmail to do a pop-before-smtp for authenticating
> a user
> to qmail so that all users can send mail to my qmail ?
>
Of course. Go to www.qmail.org, search auth. You'll find somethi
Hi...
is there a possibility with qmail to do a pop-before-smtp for authenticating
a user
to qmail so that all users can send mail to my qmail ?
Regards,
Alexander Meis
Hi :)
has anybody a running system with qmail, SMTP AUTH patch and user
management by vmailmgr ? I run into problems by using the checkvpw program
of vmailmgr ... my first problem was that checkvpw wanted to change group
and user ... as it was started by qmaild. I solved this one by setting
Am 19.12.2000 um 10:08:05 schrieb Clemens Hermann:
Hi,
Problem solved,
> /bin/true
is /usr/bin/true in FreeBSD ;-)
thanks for the help
/clemens
Am 18.12.2000 um 18:13:49 schrieb Kris Kelley:
Hi Kris,
thanks for your help!
> It may be a matter of permissions. When invoked from patched
qmail-smtpd,
> both checkpassword and cmd5checkpw do not have root access.
Therefore, they
> must be given permission to look at /etc/poppasswd. One way
Hi,
I am having some trouble setting up Krzysztof Dabrowski's SMTP-AUTH
patch with qmail.
I applied the smtp-auth patch and it run through without errors.
I compiled qmail out of the ports collection af FreeBSD 4.2 and
according to LWQ.
qmail itsself seems to run o.k. (I tested it with t
rt smtp-auth patch
I have installed/compiled the smtp-auth patch into my qmail installation,
but I cannot figure out what file to modify to add support for it. I am
running qmail 1.03 on freebsd. I tried adding it to
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run, but it does not seem to take.
Any help w
I have installed/compiled the smtp-auth patch into my qmail installation,
but I cannot figure out what file to modify to add support for it. I am
running qmail 1.03 on freebsd. I tried adding it to
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run, but it does not seem to take.
Any help would be greatly
rstag, 14. Dezember 2000 21:08
> To: QMail Mailing List
> Subject: Re: RE : Smtp AUTH
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Charles Trtanj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:04 PM
> Subject
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Trtanj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:04 PM
Subject: RE : RE : Smtp AUTH
> Well i started the smtpd server with this command "tcpserver -c20 -x
> /var/qmail/contro
he user
had first to login with pop3 and after that he can send emails.
P.s. with telnet i got a connection and auth works.
Thx for helping
Charles
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2000 18:14
> To: QMail Mai
> Hi I just want to know if there is a solution for Smtp AUTH. I
> tried qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26.tar.gz but it doesn't work :-( ...
The only other option is qmail-smtpd-auth's immediate predecessor, a patch
written by "Mrs. Brisby". If you can't get qmail-s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi I just want to know if there is a solution for Smtp AUTH. I
tried qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26.tar.gz but it doesn't work :-( ...
Please
help me cause i spend more than 5 hours on this fu. problem
thx
Charles
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
hello,
does anyone know about an sasl patch for qmail?
or are there builtin features for sasl smntp auth i haven't found yet?
thanks in advance
achim.
Hans-Juergen Schwarz wrote:
> I agree with everybody of you. The problem is that the customer is a
> reseller who is hosting quit a few domain on my server and he told
> me he can´t do this thing to his customers, because they would not
> like it. So I got to find a way to please him. I told my c
Hello all,
Tuesday, November 07, 2000, 1:49:46 PM, you wrote:
> Milen Petrinski wrote:
>> Yor problem is not with qmail setup, but the users. thay can get thair mail
>> befor sending outgoing messages, if they select "recieve" first from the
>> drop-down menu in right of the button - tell them
Milen Petrinski wrote:
> Yor problem is not with qmail setup, but the users. thay can get thair mail
> befor sending outgoing messages, if they select "recieve" first from the
> drop-down menu in right of the button - tell them to read the help.
>
> Milen
Users must check before they can send ou
en <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 12:32 PM
Subject: smtp-auth and smtp after pop
> Hello all,
> I installed qmail 1.03 and vpopmail 4.9.4 with the "enabled roaming
> users" feature on my system. But now I got big problems
ossibility. Does anybody know a patch for it? I
found the one under http://www.nimh.org/hacks/qmail-smtpd.c is that
what I want and can I use the "enable-roaming-users" feature in
vpopmail together with this smtp-auth thing (depending on what my
customers need and for those who use real M
gt; >
> > i've applied qmail-ldap-1.03-2701.patch and it's working fine. i
> > also have pop3 and imap working (courier-imap 1.2.1). Now i need to use
> > SMTP AUTH so i can deal with roaming users.
> > i've applied qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26, but i can'
> From: Juan Calderon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:29:10 -0500
>
> hi guys. just a question.
>
> i've applied qmail-ldap-1.03-2701.patch and it's working fine. i
> also have pop3 and imap working (courier-imap 1.2.1). Now i need
hi guys. just a question.
i've applied qmail-ldap-1.03-2701.patch and it's working fine. i
also have pop3 and imap working (courier-imap 1.2.1). Now i need to use
SMTP AUTH so i can deal with roaming users.
i've applied qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26, but i can't get it work.
issue, although maybe it would solve the problem I'm trying to solve
right now).
I'd like to patch my smtpd to allow SMTP AUTH on the firewall.
What do I need to do?
I'm thinking that since I have access to the LDAP server from the firewall, I
can validate the users against that. Will
of philosophical question, I suppose. But it
> actually causes problems.
Unpatched qmail does not support the SMTP AUTH command. You must be a
patch.
Technically, "AUTH=LOGIN" is incorrect. However, Netscape's MUA, and later
Outlook and Outlook Express, were coded to expect t
69).This might be some kind of philosophical question, I suppose. But it
> actually causes problems.
>
> What do you think? Is this a bug or some kind of feature? ;)
qmail doesn't implement SMTP AUTH at all. You must be running a patched version
of qmail, so you should probably talk to whoever made the patch about it.
Chris
Hi,
I am actually a EXIM user; I´d like to route my mail via a smart host - he
uses qmail. This is where this mailing list comes into sight. :)
My uplink wants me to use SMTP authentification, which my mailer supports.
Actually, it will still not try to authentificate. I suppose that the
followi
As in subject.
Changes in this release:
- changed the error message when problems with starting checkpassword
occour. This was a big source of question ("out of memory") that i receive
in my e-mail.
- Joerg Strohmayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] showed me light in the dark. I've read
th
Ken Jones wrote:
>
> Does anyone have vpopmail working with smtp authentication?
A couple of weeks ago, I posted an updated patch to let smtp-auth use
vpopmail 4.8.6 for authentication. The original instructions are still
at http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/faq.html .
Ken - is your problem just with Netscape? Did you uncomment out the #DEFINE
SMTPAUTH_NETSCAPE_WORKAROUND line??
> -Original Message-
> From: kbo [mailto:kbo]On Behalf Of Ken Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 11:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
Does anyone have vpopmail working with smtp authentication?
I'm trying to make the
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
code work with vpopmail and netscape 4.72. But
no luck so far.
If you have it working, what is your startup line
for tcpserver/qmail-smtpd? What changes did you
m
Hi all
I used qmai-ldap for my Email server, and it worked well, after patching
qmail-smtp-auth-0.24, I have some problem
_ Does anyone successfull in patching qmail-smtp-auth, and how does it work
?
_ Does I need TLS and ssl for using with smtp-auth, currently I don't have
Than
>I'm not completely sure how the authenticated SMTP conversation
>looks like. You have two possible approaches:
>
>1. qmail-popup like. You start SMTP conversation as a root, grab a
>username/password, verify it, drop root and go on. (That's what
>qmail-popup -> checkpassword -> qmail-pop3d seque
it). The program also has the correct logging of failed attempts and
correct timeouts.
[I am leaving aside other approaches like having an extra database
for smtp-auth passwords, and not touching /etc/shadow. It's not a
bad idea either, though. That database now can be limited to
qmaild user -
>It's as simple as that.
so we finally need a good , versatile solution for it. Because a lot of
users have problems with it and not everyone wants to go ahead and patch
his way through qmail-smtpd.
Brush
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 May 00, at 15:31, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote:
> Don't you think that this histeric reaction is a bit too far?
> checkpassword is certainly safer suid program that most of suids in
> your system.
No it is not. Any program which allows to enumera
>Do not, EVER, do that. The moment you do, checkpassword becomes a /bin/su
>replacement without any logging or limiting.
Don't you think that this histeric reaction is a bit too far?
checkpassword is certainly safer suid program that most of suids in your
system.
And another one:
>Don't do t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 May 00, at 8:52, Denise Williams wrote:
> solution: /bin/checkpassword needs to be suid'ed to root for those
> systems using shadow passwords.
Don't do that! You have just created a target for a dictionary attack;
suid /bin/checkpassword is /
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 08:52:05AM -0400, Denise Williams wrote:
> Hi, I received mail from Krzysztof Dabrowski that solved my problem.
>
> solution: /bin/checkpassword needs to be suid'ed to root for those systems
> using shadow passwords.
Do not, EVER, do that. The moment you do, checkpassword
]
Sent: May 29, 2000 9:32:33 AM GMT
Subject: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5
Hello,
I am having problems using smtp-auth from an MS Outlook Express 5 client.
Namely I can do pop but I can't smtp-auth. I can also smtp.
__
FREE Personalized Email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 29, 2000 9:32:33 AM GMT
Subject: smtp-auth and MS Outlook Express 5
Hello,
I am having problems using smtp-auth from an MS Outlook Express 5 client.
Namely I can do pop but I can't smtp-auth. I can also smtp.
My setup:
Server: Running Linux 2.2.12-20, Redhat 6.1
Hello,
I am having problems using smtp-auth from an MS Outlook Express 5 client.
Namely I can do pop but I can't smtp-auth. I can also smtp.
My setup:
Server: Running Linux 2.2.12-20, Redhat 6.1
Qmail-1.03
tcpserver out of ucspi-tcp-0.88
supervise out of daemontools-0.70
SMTP-AUTH patch:
I am trying to scrounge up a test server to try this on.
Steve P.
- Original Message -
From: "Rainer Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steve Peace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: smtp-auth and amavis...
> Hi!
>
> &
to look at,
you can get it at
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
Thanks,
Steve P.
- Original Message -
From: "Rainer Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steve Peace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 2:3
> Steve Peace wrote:
Hi!
> Has anyone tried installing the smtp-auth qmail patch after installing
> the amavis ant-virus wrapper? I tried and was no longer able to send
Sorry, no.
> or receive mail. I had to re-install the qmail binaries and then
> re-install amavis. Any he
At 21:12 2000-05-16, you wrote:
Has anyone tried installing the
smtp-auth qmail patch after installing the amavis ant-virus
wrapper? I tried and was no longer able to send or receive
mail. I had to re-install the qmail binaries and then re-install
amavis. Any help or knowledge would be
Has anyone tried installing the smtp-auth qmail patch after
installing the amavis ant-virus wrapper? I tried and was no longer able to
send or receive mail. I had to re-install the qmail binaries and then
re-install amavis. Any help or knowledge would be
appreciated.
Steve P.
t;
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 11:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: SMTP AUTH - is there a patch for it in qmail?
> >
> >
> > > http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
> > >
> > > Kris
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
... what about others?
>
> thanks,
> Colin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Krzysztof Dabrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 11:34 PM
> Subject: Re: SMTP AUTH - is there a patch for it in qmail?
>
>The page mentions that Outlook 97 doesn't work what about others?
Outlook'97 does not have support for smtp-auth at all.
'98 supports it. exactly like outlook express.
Kris
Does this work with any Outlook versions?
The page mentions that Outlook 97 doesn't work what about others?
thanks,
Colin
- Original Message -
From: Krzysztof Dabrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 11:34 PM
Subject: R
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
Kris
Hello all,
is there a SMTP AUTH patch for qmail?
Regards,
Robert Varga
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
