Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ed Mullen wrote: WLS wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 10:37 AM WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 6:34 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provi

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

WLS wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 10:37 AM WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 6:34 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provides more excitemen

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ed Mullen wrote: WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 10:37 AM WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 6:34 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provides more excitement... ;-) Ro

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 10:37 AM WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 6:34 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provides more excitement... ;-) Robert Kaiser Be

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 10:37 AM WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 6:34 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provides more excitement... ;-) Robert Kaiser Be daring - us

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 9/30/2010 10:37 AM WLS wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 6:34 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provides more excitement... ;-) Robert Kaiser Be daring - use 2.0.9pre :-)

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

W3BNR wrote: On 9/30/2010 6:34 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provides more excitement... ;-) Robert Kaiser Be daring - use 2.0.9pre :-) Be more daring and use 2.1b1.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 9/30/2010 6:34 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provides more excitement... ;-) Robert Kaiser Be daring - use 2.0.9pre :-) -- Ed http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1zhwu/ Powe

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Bill Davidsen schrieb: Boring! Installed and works. No excitement. Hah! Now I guess we just need to find you a release that provides more excitement... ;-) Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as foo

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Robert Kaiser wrote: The Mozilla community discovered a crash some of our users have been seeing at startup after updates to our previous releases. To fix that issue, SeaMonkey 2.0.8 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. Boring! Installed

Re: [OT - PJ's Website Tutorial] Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

ginal "SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available". You folks ought to at least have the courtesy to tag your subthreads so that others do not have to wade through seemingly endless off-topic "advise" to PJ. Where have you been, was redirected to general and no new comments for several

[OT - PJ's Website Tutorial] Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

x27;s original "SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available". You folks ought to at least have the courtesy to tag your subthreads so that others do not have to wade through seemingly endless off-topic "advise" to PJ. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ed Mullen wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: [let's do some snipping here...] using a Captcha does the same thing as using a username and password without the need for such and until Google bou

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ed Mullen wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Terry R. wrote: On 9/23/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard Terry R. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should stop spreading

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: Terry R. wrote: On 9/23/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard Terry R. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should stop spreading FUD. I know that,

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: [let's do some snipping here...] using a Captcha does the same thing as using a username and password without the need for such and until Google bought the leading ca

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Terry R. wrote: On 9/23/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard Terry R. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should stop spreading FUD. I know that, without DreamWeaver, P

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ed Mullen wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 23.09.2010 11:47, Ed Mullen wrote: --- Original Message --- Phillip Jones wrote: If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the priv

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: [let's do some snipping here...] using a Captcha does the same thing as using a username and password without the need for such and until Google bought the leading captcha software develo

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 23.09.2010 11:47, Ed Mullen wrote: --- Original Message --- Phillip Jones wrote: If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private content get in

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ed Mullen wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private content get into a password protected to change the content when needed. 1. User goes to URL of main site 2. User ent

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 23.09.2010 11:31, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private content get into a password protected to change the content when neede

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ed Mullen wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 23.09.2010 11:47, Ed Mullen wrote: --- Original Message --- Phillip Jones wrote: If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private content get into a password prote

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

W3BNR wrote: On 9/23/2010 12:31 PM Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Terry R. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should stop spreading FUD. I know that, without DreamWeaver, Phillip would

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Robert Kaiser wrote: The Mozilla community discovered a crash some of our users have been seeing at startup after updates to our previous releases. To fix that issue, SeaMonkey 2.0.8 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free download from www.seamonkey-project.org. I was never bitte

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 9/23/2010 9:14 AM On a whim, Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard Terry R. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should stop spreading FUD. I know that, without DreamWeaver, Phillip would not

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 9/23/2010 12:31 PM Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Terry R. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should stop spreading FUD. I know that, without DreamWeaver, Phillip would not even be ab

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 23.09.2010 11:47, Ed Mullen wrote: --- Original Message --- Phillip Jones wrote: If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private content get into a password protected to change the

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 22.09.2010 22:43, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- using a Captcha does the same thing as using a username and password without the need for such and until Google bought the leading captcha software developer, It was as secure as having a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 23.09.2010 11:47, Ed Mullen wrote: --- Original Message --- > Phillip Jones wrote: > >> If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add >> User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private >> content get into a password protected to change the content wh

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private content get into a password protected to change the content when needed. 1. User goes to URL of main site 2. User enters Username and P

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 23.09.2010 11:31, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > If it doesn't do what I need then I will figure out how to add > User-name/Password. But how does the User, the one that adds the private > content get into a password protected to change the content when needed. It would be

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Terry R. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should stop spreading FUD. I know that, without DreamWeaver, Phillip would not even be able to *have* a web site online. Geez. Do

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Phillip Jones wrote: [let's do some snipping here...] >>> using a Captcha does the same thing as using a username and password >>> without the need for such and until Google bought the leading >>> captcha software developer, It was as secur

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 10-09-23 8:14 AM, Headfrog wrote: Ever since I upgraded to 2.0.8, it has crashed totally four or five times every morning. Then it seems stable for the remainder of the day In SeaMonke, go to the address about:crashes (without the quotes) and tell us your latest crash IDs. We can then

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 22.09.2010 22:43, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- using a Captcha does the same thing as using a username and password without the need for such and until Google bought the leading captcha software developer, It was as secure as having a user name and pa

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: The forms scripts I use that happen to use a captcha technique cannot be accessed by anyone but a human being who can read and type. Maybe one day someone will build a piece of sw that can read a jumblepd-up bunch of pixels and correctly respond

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: So what is "Googel" going to do with your association members' names? Steal their bank accounts? If Google owns and knows the captcha database, then it wi

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Terry R. wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard >> It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should >> stop spreading FUD. I know that, without DreamWeaver, Phillip would >> not even be able to *have* a web site online. > > Geez. Do you feel good about y

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 9/23/2010 4:31 AM On a whim, Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on the keyboard It's very obvious Phillip knows not of what he speaks, and he should stop spreading FUD. I know that, without DreamWeaver, Phillip would not even be able to *have* a web site online. Geez. Do you feel good

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 22.09.2010 22:43, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > using a Captcha does the same thing as using a username and password > without the need for such and until Google bought the leading captcha > software developer, It was as secure as having a user name and password. No it do

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On Sep 15, 5:17 pm, Robert Kaiser wrote: > The Mozilla community discovered a crash some of our users have been > seeing at startup after updates to our previous releases. To fix that > issue, SeaMonkey 2.0.8 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a > free download fromwww.seamonkey-proje

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ed Mullen wrote: > The forms scripts I use that happen to use a captcha technique cannot > be accessed by anyone but a human being who can read and type. Maybe > one day someone will build a piece of sw that can read a jumblepd-up > bunch of pixels and correctly respond to them but it isn't possi

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: Lucas Levrel wrote: ---snip--- Do you think "Google and others" don't honor them? A resounding YES!! Google does honor them. I was considering a Captcha software to put on Web page on a website for an association, I found out that Goog

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: So what is "Googel" going to do with your association members' names? Steal their bank accounts? If Google owns and knows the captcha database, then it will be easy to bypass the captcha

Re: Google-free SM [Was: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available]

d...@kd4e.com wrote: So what is "Googel" going to do with your association members' names? Steal their bank accounts? Have you heard the pompous declarations of the head of Google? http://www.guntheranderson.com/v/data/forwhati.htm -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ Only in America are there

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Phillip Jones wrote: >>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: So what is "Googel" going to do with your association members' names? Steal their bank accounts? >>> >>> If Google owns and knows the captcha database, then it will be >>> e

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: So what is "Googel" going to do with your association members' names? Steal their bank accounts? If Google owns and knows the captcha database, then it will be easy to bypass the captcha and get private infor

Re: Google-free SM [Was: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available]

That soon people will not ask Google merely for information but will rely upon them for direction because Google has gathered so much data about them over so long a period of time that they know more about them than they do. Orwell's 1984 may be a few decades late but according to Google they are

Re: Google-free SM [Was: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available]

"d...@kd4e.com" wrote: >> So what is "Googel" going to do with your association members' names? >> Steal their bank accounts? > > Have you heard the pompous declarations of the head of Google? > > That soon people will not ask Google merely for information > but will rely upon them for direction

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 22.09.2010 13:54, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Lucas Levrel wrote: > ---snip--- > >> Do you think "Google and others" don't honor them? >> > A resounding YES!! Well, you're wrong, they do. > I was considering a Captcha software to put on

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 21.09.2010 16:40, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 21.09.2010 10:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- W3BNR wrote: On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_N

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> So what is "Googel" going to do with your association members' names? >> Steal their bank accounts? > > If Google owns and knows the captcha database, then it will be easy > to bypass the captcha and get private information. For example I

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Lucas Levrel wrote: ---snip--- Restore snip: There exist HTML meta tags telling bots not to index and even not to follow links. Do you think "Google and others" don't honor them? A resounding YES!!

Re: Google-free SM [Was: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available]

So what is "Googel" going to do with your association members' names? Steal their bank accounts? Have you heard the pompous declarations of the head of Google? That soon people will not ask Google merely for information but will rely upon them for direction because Google has gathered so much d

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: > Lucas Levrel wrote: > ---snip--- Restore snip: >> There exist HTML meta tags telling bots not to index and even not to >> follow links. >> Do you think "Google and others" don't honor them? > > A resounding YES!! Phillip, your paranoia is

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

> Phillip Jones wrote: Lucas Levrel wrote: ---snip--- Do you think "Google and others" don't honor them? A resounding YES!! I was considering a Captcha software to put on Web page on a website for an association, I found out that Googel had purchased it. So No

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Lucas Levrel wrote: ---snip--- Do you think "Google and others" don't honor them? A resounding YES!! I was considering a Captcha software to put on Web page on a website for an association, I found out that Googel had purchased it. So Now the members only pa

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Le 22 septembre 2010, Robert Kaiser a écrit : Phew, and I had hoped to not have this URL spread to widely because I have no clue what heavy hitting it and its links will do to the server - and when you publish it here, Google and others will probably go and follow every link to index it... T

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Philip Chee schrieb: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:25:24 -0500, Jay Garcia wrote: Look at the list of devs (module owners) here: http://www.mozilla.org/about/owners.html For SeaMonkey specific developers perhaps it would be better to look at:

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 22.09.2010 00:40, Philip Chee wrote: --- Original Message --- > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:25:24 -0500, Jay Garcia wrote: > >> Look at the list of devs (module owners) here: >> http://www.mozilla.org/about/owners.html > > For SeaMonkey specific developers perhaps it would be better to look at:

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:25:24 -0500, Jay Garcia wrote: > Look at the list of devs (module owners) here: > http://www.mozilla.org/about/owners.html For SeaMonkey specific developers perhaps it would be better to look at: Phil -- Philip Chee

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 21.09.2010 16:40, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 21.09.2010 10:11, Ray_Net wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- > W3BNR wrote: >> On 9/20/

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 21.09.2010 10:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- W3BNR wrote: On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote:

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 21.09.2010 10:11, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> W3BNR wrote: On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 19:34, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- W3BNR wrote: On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- W3BNR wrote: On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 13:27, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- >> Cripes Phillip!!! Re-read the message, especially the lines " ... >> reported by ..." >> >> How many of those reporters do you think/know are devs? My guess .. >> NONE!! >> > I can't make that guess because I don't know first

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 10:31, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 04:05, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 19:34, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> W3BNR wrote: On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- W3BNR wrote: On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- > W3BNR wrote: >> On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: >>> Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: > Jay Garcia wrote: >> That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

W3BNR wrote: On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found. You are not looki

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 10:31, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 13:02, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 10:42, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote:

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 10:31, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 13:02, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 20.09.2010 10:42, Phillip Jones wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: >> Jay Garcia wrot

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 10:31, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: >>> Jay Garcia wrote: >> That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. >> >>> I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 10:42, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where deve

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:31:38 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: >>> Jay Garcia wrote: >> That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. >> >>> I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 10:42, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Ray_Net wrote: >> Philip Chee wrote: >>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: >>> > That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. >>> I've never seen a case where de

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 10:44, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 20.09.2010 00:57, Philip Chee wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: >>> > That is not true, please stop spread

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 10:31, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: >>> Jay Garcia wrote: >> That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. >> >>> I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 20.09.2010 00:57, Philip Chee wrote: --- Original Message --- On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found. You are not looking hard enough. Look harder. I fixe

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found. You are not looking hard enough. Look harder. I fixed the following

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 04:05, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: >>> Jay Garcia wrote: >> That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. >> >>> I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a use

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 20.09.2010 00:57, Philip Chee wrote: --- Original Message --- > On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: >> Jay Garcia wrote: > >>> That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. > >> I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found. > > You are

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found. You are not looking hard enough

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found. You are not looking hard enough. Look harder. I fixed the following

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: > Jay Garcia wrote: >> That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. > I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user found. You are not looking hard enough. Look harder. I fixed the following bugs: Bug 86400 re

Bugs (was: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available)

David E. Ross wrote: Since 2003, I have submitted 246 bug reports. Let me take the opportunity to say Thank You. :-) Greetings, Jens P.S.: 172 since 2004 for me, and counting. -- Jens Hatlak SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker ___

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 19.09.2010 09:20, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 19.09.2010 08:29, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Developers never take bugs that users find as serious. They have the attitude of "what the h... does a dumb a...

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 19.09.2010 10:59, Jay Garcia wrote: --- Original Message --- > On 19.09.2010 09:20, Phillip Jones wrote: > > --- Original Message --- > >> Jay Garcia wrote: >>> On 19.09.2010 08:29, Phillip Jones wrote: >>> >>> --- Original Message --- >>> Developers never take bugs that users fin

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 9/19/10 7:20 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 19.09.2010 08:29, Phillip Jones wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> Developers never take bugs that users find as serious. They have the >>> attitude of "what the h... does a dumb a... user know about anything. We >>> d

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 19.09.2010 09:20, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 19.09.2010 08:29, Phillip Jones wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> Developers never take bugs that users find as serious. They have the >>> attitude of "what the h... does a dumb a... user

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Jay Garcia wrote: On 19.09.2010 08:29, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- Developers never take bugs that users find as serious. They have the attitude of "what the h... does a dumb a... user know about anything. We designed it the way it was supposed to work." only when a anoth

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

On 19.09.2010 08:29, Phillip Jones wrote: --- Original Message --- > Developers never take bugs that users find as serious. They have the > attitude of "what the h... does a dumb a... user know about anything. We > designed it the way it was supposed to work." ne when a another > developer come

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.8 Available

Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:23:37 -0400, Chris Ilias wrote: It would be best to ask in mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey about whether or not the change affected SeaMonkey mail composition intentionally or not. We share the same backend mailnews code with Thunderbird and the backend ht

  1   2   >