On 11 Jan 2012 22:08, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
I know what areas of data I am working on.
OK Just crashed it again ... but having done at least a couple of hours
work and saved MOST of it.
So to log current state ...
Flash area just went grey
Bottom
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
[follow-ups to legal-talk please]
David Murn wrote:
I have no interest in the legal detail of the licence, only
interested in
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 26/10/2010 10:04, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Andy Mabbetta...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On 25 October 2010 12:47, Ed Avise...@waniasset.com wrote:
Shaun McDonaldsh...@... writes:
I
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 25 October 2010 12:47, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Shaun McDonald sh...@... writes:
I have been adding the three letter short code as the ref tag when I have
been
editing around stations. e.g.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:02 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2010 00:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I wish i had a pony.
This is why things end up in a endless debate, people pose serious
questions and you either can't be bothered, or won't respond properly
Hi,
You can put in requests or bug reports through trac.
Details are on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenCycleMap
I don't believe anything is done, or planned to be done, with
bicycle=designated at the moment.
Dave
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:58 PM, john whelan
This is a direct consequence of OSM not being PD !
From our Homepage:
The project (OSM) was started because most maps you think of as free
actually have legal or technical restrictions on their use, holding back
people from using them in creative, productive, or unexpected ways.
This is
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Nick Black nickbla...@gmail.com wrote:
I would love to have an iPad app to map with. I've actually just come
back from a Mapzen POI Collector mapping trip around a town that could
have really used an iPad to add some roads and other features. But
from
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:19:42 +0200, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Hi,
Jonas Stein wrote:
In the IRC channel i was told, that there are users who paint
empty nodes in the map to mark things like
road is not
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi wrote:
Richard gave me an idea for mixing the stew.
Let's say that a user who stays with CC-BY-SA has drawn crossing streets and
buildings around the corner. Then another user who is willing to go with ODbL
locates
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi wrote:
Richard gave me an idea for mixing the stew.
Let's say that a user who stays with CC-BY-SA has drawn crossing streets and
buildings around the corner. Then another user who is willing to go with ODbL
locates
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:24 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 August 2010 23:04, Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
If you support the share-alike concept, I urge you to accept the new
Contributor Terms which provides for a coherent Attribution, Share-Alike
license
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:49 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 August 2010 23:44, Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de wrote:
In case i dont care and like PD more than CC-BY-SA or even worse the ODbl i
would
be more than happy to continue with CC-BY-SA and accept it to fail in court,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
SteveC-2 wrote:
One quote from the talk in particular comes to mind: it's a technique
that poisonous people can use to derail a consensus-based community from
actually achieving consensus. You have this noisy minority
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:05 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 July 2010 18:59, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederik, again you mix it all up. I said i'm fine with ODBL (and so
far everyone who rants about CT says nothing bad about ODBL). I truely
respect
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
I am currently trying to create a series of shapefiles from postcodes
(using OS Open Geo Data) using the code from Random Junk
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Kevin Peat ke...@kevinpeat.com wrote:
On 9 April 2010 18:40, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
Hasn't one of OSM's (many) mantras been doesn't matter if it's
approximate: someone can always improve it later or rough is better than
nothing? Sure, some
It's worth noting that the Yahoo aerial photography is also out of date; in
some
cases [1] people have traced streets from the photo which bear no relation to
what's on the ground. Yet nobody suggests we should stop tracing from it.
Yes they do.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm in line with this view too. We cannot assume that the OS mapping is
correct, it may or may not be current or accurate, so it's useful as a guide
in the absence of any other verification source.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:26 PM, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:46 PM, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
If we use only manual surveying, we can only
achieve coverage of about 1%. I don't think that is satisfactory. Imports
are
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 18:07 +0100, Dave Stubbs wrote:
Basically: please don't break the map :-)
perhaps a stupid question... Is there no version control? I couldn't
find anything on the wiki about it.
Sure.
But if you
Hi,
The Ordnance Survey OpenData released today contains a dataset called
Code-Point Open giving the coordinates of about 1.5 million postcodes.
I've added a layer onto the postcode area map to show this data in the
same way it's been showing NPE, OSM and FreeThePostcode data for some
time.
Go
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
The world doesn't require Potlatch 2 wondrousness. The world would
already sigh with relief if Potlatch could be made to not break
relation ordering when a way is split ;-)
Has the world
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 26 February 2010 19:44, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
There are two big advantages of a simple mode
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2010 19:44, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
There are two big advantages of a simple mode to an existing full editor:
- you don't have to write the OSM handling parts again, even a simple
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:07 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
...or figuring out how to attract more flash coders.
Speaking for myself, I didn't know there were opportunities to work on
PL2. A few more obvious
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk
wrote:
There have been a number of posts to dev on the subject, sorry you
missed them. If you want to get involved then that's great.
You can see
Free release of the raster products would also harm public perceptions
of Ordnance Survey.
The perception of OS is that they're data hoarders (which the tax payer
payed for) in the belief that 'knowledge is power'
Umm, no. The public perception of the OS is that they make pretty maps
of
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 02:30:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 22/12/09 14:11, John Smith wrote:
When does anyone plan to use SSL to protect passwords and users on OSM?
It's on my to do list to create a CSR and give to
Have you seen this?
http://www.osmfoundation.org/images/3/3c/License_Proposal.pdf
Under the section 'So what should I do?' 'Refuse', it says: Your
contributions will not be deleted
Yet if you click on the link to the backup plan
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Jason Cunningham
jamicu...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can I also be sorry for being pedantic and point out an issue with the
license.
The OSMF decided to base themselves in the UK and is
A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales. Company
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:19 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Sorry to be pedantic but the wording of the OSMF member vote is:
Do you approve the process of moving OpenStreetMap to the ODbL?
Yes, I approve.
No, I do not approve.
Unfortunately this sentence on which we are asked
as far as i can see the contributor terms definition says the same
thing, except ...
...except the context is different. With CC BY-SA you are giving everyone
the same rights. With the Contributor Terms the only one to have those
rights is the OSMF.
But only with the condition that
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:29:37 -0500, Ian Dees wrote:
Although it may/may not be illegal, it is definitely a breach of
contract.
Sorry for misleading title, but I still don't understand how this can be
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net wrote:
On 05/10/09 11:04, Dave Stubbs wrote:
As the person whose first came up with a no-names map for London
(well, actually it was a named map of London, turned into a nonames
map on SteveC's suggestion), I have an *official
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs writes:
I was convinced otherwise by some very persuasive arguments and now
think it's completely not worth doing and not at all important.
I'm not convinced. Could you share them?
a) what are you actually
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net wrote:
On 06/10/09 15:18, Dave Stubbs wrote:
a) what are you actually marking?
- no name in OSM -- we know that already
- the mapper didn't find a name -- so we shouldn't check again?
Probably not, no. Just as when
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Matt Amos writes:
forcing all mappers, editors and renderers to support it?
Why do people keep saying that I want to use force? From where do
they get this idea? Have I ever suggested the use of force? Gun,
knife,
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
For starters if the maintainers of JOSM Potlatch and Merkaartor encouraged
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
For starters if the maintainers of JOSM Potlatch and Merkaartor encouraged
the use of yes/no it would be a way forward.
Potlatch does indeed have 'yes' (rather than 'true'
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote:
No, he is a leader because we respect him. THAT is how leaders in
an anarchic state
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson
I'm tired of this silly true/false 1/0 yes/no up/down left/right
in/out fore/aft port/starboard debate/debacle. It's trivial, it's
stupid, we could just as easily toss a coin as engage in any rational
debate about how binary values should be expressed.
When it prevents flickr etc from
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Frankie Roberto wrote:
2009/9/29 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
It works for building=yes, but not building=true. Well, Flickr says
This is a feature in OpenStreetMap
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
I wouldn't read too much into it, especially as they said,
we’ve almost certainly got at least some of it wrong but hopefully we
got part of it right and can correct the rest as we go
Dave
You see
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Personally, I don't think these should be rendered on the main maps,
osmarender:renderRef is a tag to prevent rendering.
I said 'maps', plural. One renderer's trick of not showing certain
features is certainly
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org wrote:
2009/9/18 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
***PLEASE*** PULL THE PLUG ON HIM!
Is it a good idea to remove the Live Change Feature in Potlatch for everyone.
I'm thinking this is the cause for a lot of our problems.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:26 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 18/09/2009 10:53, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 18/09/09 10:33, David Earl wrote:
Tom - this is persistent continuous abuse. I really think we have to
block his IP address until such time as we can work out how to deal
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:19 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
wrote:
I agree. I think it would be even more useful to be able to quarantine
particular users changesets for manual review so
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 17/09/2009 14:38, David Earl wrote:
On 17/09/2009 14:35, David Earl wrote:
Another one at 13:56, also failed to revert
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2511524
changeset upload failed: 412
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
Hi,
I set about correcting a few dozen post code entries in NPE for south east
London, but the postcodes map doesn't seem to be updating:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Dan Karran d...@karran.net wrote:
2009/9/14 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
OK, back up and running now.
Thanks for getting that up and running again Dave.
Would it be possible for you to include labels for the postal sectors
on there as well, so
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:11 PM, MPsingular...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/09/2009, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
I'm against voting. Voting is a way to take responsibility away from the
individual. I think that in most cases we should strive to have
individuals responsible for
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
I'd like to do a Brainstorming about how a Revert-Tool could look like,
that is more open to the Community, can be used without programming
knowledge and is able to to reverts fast.
I'm thinking of a process like this:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Pierenpier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Dave Stubbsosm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
As far as I know most of the tools used for reverting currently are
also public -- the problem being, they're dangerous to use if you
don't know what
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
You could check the tool on the edits made over the previous two months
by Liam123, some of which have still not been reverted for lack of a
suitable tool to achieve it.
Are you talking about
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Lized...@billiau.net wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Peter Miller wrote:
Only 'established users' can upload images to Wikipedia and I would
suggest that the revert option is only available to established OSM
users. It would need to take many edits to get
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:57 PM, WessexMariowessexmario-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I'd like to use the OSM Cycle Map rendering at different zoom levels as
the base layer for a project I'm doing, but I want to overlay something
else, and the emphasised cycleways in large red lines are both
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 18 Aug 2009, at 10:30, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 18/08/09 09:27, Peter Miller wrote:
Andy mentions that copyright violation needs to go to the Data
Working
Group. Why? Sure the foundation needs a log of action of
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Tom Chancet...@acrewoods.net wrote:
Hi,
I set about correcting a few dozen post code entries in NPE for south east
London, but the postcodes map doesn't seem to be updating:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Tobias Knerro...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Tom Chance wrote:
- Tags are proposed on the wiki, no change to current practice
- If the proposal throws into question existing, accepted tags, defer the
proposal to small working groups
- These working groups study
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Tom Chancet...@acrewoods.net wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:13:39 +0200, Martin Simon wrote:
Path was and is intended to provide an alternative tagging scheme
for things tagged with footway/bridleway/cycleway before that is not
biased mode-of-transport-wise.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Stefan de Koninkste...@konink.de wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
And then you realise that the alignment of Yahoo Imagery is wrong
on most
places, and you have killed good vector material. Great job :)
Good
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Jeffrey Martindogs...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we want different policies for different areas and different kinds of
data.
For example once all the roads are mapped we freeze the roads, but we allow
free changing of street names until they reach a freeze point.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Matt Amos wrote:
LWG cannot entirely resolve these questions, as they need open
discussion and community consensus (which we obviously can't provide
on our own). even then, final interpretation is up to the
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:19:25AM +, Joe Richards wrote:
I am tagging some buildings which contain multiple addresses in them, but
not interpolated
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:16 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
For the record: I agree with Peter that we need to undo this user's
changes, however it is done, and that it could cause large parts of East
Anglia to be wiped out if data that happened to have his name on were to
be
2009/7/7 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com:
Ed Avis eda at waniasset.com writes:
Rather than plant_type=orange_tree or similar, I think it would make more
sense
to tag plants and trees with the scientific (Latin) name of their species or
hybrid. These are already standardized and the local language
2009/7/4 Jack Stringer jack.ix...@googlemail.com:
No need for relations.
Just tag each address with addr:postcode or postal_code and all is sorted.
Tag it with addr:postcode as that seems to be the system for now.
And in case you haven't seen it:
2009/7/4 Jack Stringer jack.ix...@googlemail.com:
The reson for removing it would help in clarifying which one is to be used.
Which one is that then? :-)
Also for the programmers it saves on having to call 2 tags.
Meh.. took me ten seconds for that map.
If we take the
atitude you suggest
2009/7/3 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 08:57, Tom Hughes wrote:
Thomas Schäfer wrote:
sorry the theme is for the most of the people off topic. They use the
application osm via internet. But the fundament of the internet
(its
protocol) is changing.
We (the admins) are all
2009/6/26 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Im sending it out to everyone, as its of international significance when
dealing with bulk data.
The 4 general tags
attribution=Natural Resources Canada
- tells the users what agency it came from (public/private)
2009/6/18 Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Joe Richards wrote:
Maybe http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0lon=-0zoom=2 would be more
diplomatic, but then we should be using a map that did not make the
Uk, India, Brazil and New Zealand all the same size. snip
2009/6/9 Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de:
Hi!
Dave Stubbs schrieb:
Which just tells you those aren't the appropriate tags of which matt
speaks.
Careful selection of tags means that nothing existing needs to change,
unless it's to make life easier for the user by adding filtering
features
2009/6/9 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jonathan
Bennettopenstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
Ed Loach wrote:
Have you a wiki page to say how to tag for things to render under
each category?
Tag... Render...
BURN HIM! BURN!
:-)
Gah, the common
2009/6/8 Stephen Gower socks-openstreetmap@earth.li:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:12:13AM +0100, Dave Stubbs wrote:
You could have done church_type=cathedral, church_type=church, and
church_type=chapel (arbitrary tag name choice... probably not a good
one) and let the renderer figure out
2009/6/8 Peter Dörrie peter.doer...@googlemail.com:
as frederik says, it doesn't need to be implemented in the API - all
of it can already be done client-side using the appropriate tags*.
Well several Users made the point that this would break all applications
that exist today, as they
2009/6/8 Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk:
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Sustrans do not have accurate locations for their mileposts and art so
are interested in data gathered by OSM contributors.
I'll try to get all the ones on the northern half of NCN 7 the
2009/6/4 Stephan Plepelits sk...@xover.htu.tuwien.ac.at:
Hi Folks!
I'm the one who originally created the proposal.
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:52:33PM +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Hmmm... I guess the main problem that people have is that a tag like
importance (or its synonyms) is
2009/6/4 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
I have been looking at the coverage of maxspeed limit data for highways in
the UK and we seem to have a right mix of styles.
Here is the data for bug chunk of England while avoiding including anything
from France or Ireland (which would include
2009/6/4 WessexMario wessexmario-...@yahoo.co.uk:
I propose that we adopt a new key: maxspeed_mph
It exists: maxspeed:mph
Problems I'll do inline:
It would be
- simpler for UK, USA and other imperial countries to enter the speed.
- less prone to error - users may not be used to kph
2009/6/4 WessexMario wessexmario-...@yahoo.co.uk:
Very helpful. And to be clear is says their should be a space between
the number and the unit, ie '50 mph' not '50mph'.
I wouldn't get too concerned about the space, computers can handle that well,
so
an optional whitespace should be
2009/6/2 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk:
Important to who?
A good question. Perhaps prominence rather than important?
I'm in two minds about the proposal. It feels like it is tagging for
the renderer, but could be argued that it is providing information
about how well known a place is to allow
2009/5/13 Rory McCann r...@technomancy.org:
On 30/04/09 13:17, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Greg Troxel
and you define the relation to
say that all ways in some area of some type should be in the relation.
You try to use relations to define a category but :
2009/4/30 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
At the risk of reopening earlier very lengthy discussions - this suggestion
seems to me to be an unnecessary misuse of the tag highway=cycleway which
has an accepted and fairly well agreed meaning. It also seems to be a prima
facie case of tagging
2009/4/16 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
Torsten Mohr wrote:
2. relations-090408.osm.bz2 (what is this one for? I did not use it at
all.)
It is included in the planet file you have downloaded; the extra
download is only for people who are not interested in the rest.
2009/4/16 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
Dave Stubbs wrote:
Somewhere between 4-5GB is required at the moment -- it increases all
the time though :-)
Oh, then I have seriously overestimated the memory usage... I was unable to
do Europe on a 2 GB machine so I figured the planet
2009/3/29 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com:
Can you spot it?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.4122lon=-7.3859zoom=12layers=00B0FTF
That's what you get for not building epic bridges, tunnels, and other
contour defying structures :-P
Dave
___
talk
2009/3/29 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
El Domingo, 29 de Marzo de 2009, Dave Stubbs escribió:
2009/3/29 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com:
Can you spot it?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.4122lon=-7.3859zoom=12layers=00B0
FTF
That's what you get for not building epic
2009/3/18 Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com:
On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:53 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
While the effort being put into links WITH wikipedia are to be
applauded, many of us are no longer contributing to wikipedia
because of
their propensity to kill of material that is not 'noteworthy'!
2009/3/17 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
On 16 Mar 2009, at 17:55, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Osmdbstats2.png
and I wonder why there is a sudden drop in the node count immediately
before commencing the TIGER import. - It looks as if half
2009/3/13 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Pieren Pieren wrote:
May I suggest a new tag:
landuse=blur
Superb. I've been wanting a tag like that for a while. I have now used it
for the first time, in a location not that far from where I live:
2009/3/8 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
On 7 Mar 2009, at 23:56, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Gervase Markham gerv-
gm...@gerv.net wrote:
b) If people are reverse-engineering our stuff, they need a
massive, sustained, continuous Mechanical Turk
2009/3/6 graham gra...@theseamans.net:
graham wrote:
How do I find out if I'm a member in good standing?
Just saw the relevant page:
http://foundation.openstreetmap.org/membership/
which sounds as though if you don't pay annually, even if not reminded,
you're probably dropped. Haven't
2009/3/5 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
On 27 Feb 2009, at 05:04, Ben Laenen wrote:
It looks like we finally got some kind of License plan for the step
towards the new license, so everyone check
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Implementation_Plan
Let me start with the
2009/3/5 Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Matt Amos wrote:
us trying to read a complex license
without comments is like lawyers trying to read complex code without
comments.
They're mostly hard to read because they're tedious in their detail. Legal
writing
2009/3/5 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
2009/3/5 Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com:
On Mar 5, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Matt Amos wrote:
us trying to read a complex license
without comments is like lawyers trying to read complex code without
comments.
They're mostly hard to read because
2009/3/4 Ulf Möller use...@ulfm.de:
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
then it emerges that this was an intentional change requested by the OSM
Foundation.
I haven't seen this emerging anywhere. (In fact, the OSM foundation,
represented by their board of directors, seems to have been remarkably
2009/3/4 80n 80n...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
You have discussed some elaborate plans about what data from a
non-relicensing
contributor would have to be deleted and what would have to be kept.
In the worst case, in the event of a dispute,
2009/3/4 Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com:
Hi All
I've read through a bundle of licence emails, and there is one aspect that
worries me, which hopefully someone can clarify.
From my understanding (and I dont speak legalese), under the CCBYSA license
you can take OSM data, create a
1 - 100 von 352 matches
Mail list logo
