e benefits to both models, but the risks are much bigger on
one side.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:44 PM Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> I agree with Mateusz that the wiki IS the project's standard document for
> the meaning of tagging (from the perspective of data con
the Anglo-American legal context so I removed it.
However, perhaps there is a more polite way to say the same sort of thing,
without seeming to invite "getting away with it?"
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:36 AM Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.o
[This is the current text:]
This document is an attempt to summarize the expectations the OpenStreetMap
mapper community has for OSM data users regarding the attribution required
by the OpenStreetMap license.
In line with the general culture of OpenStreetMap it does not try to
provide step by
d make any comments for improvement if needed:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice
-- Joseph Eisenberg
(*Note that "everybody" does not include the interests of corporations,
which are not persons, but rather the interests of individual mapper
is broken?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Reddit is entirely blocked by all ISPs in Indonesia due to government
policy, so I am not able to participate in any discussions on that website
while I am living there.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:39 PM Rory McCann wrote:
> Hello OSMers,
>
> Some of us on the OSM F
Would you mind describing the proposed system here, in a concise form?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 7:36 PM TheAdventurer64 <
little.banana.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A user and I were talking about implementing a system for better mapping,
> as described here:
>
Many of the old "pack trail" labeled features near my home-town are now
overgrown and barely usable. I would be skeptical about the utility of this
tag - mappers will need to survey the trail in person before suggesting
that it is currently suitable for horse, mules or other pack animals
d the wikidata
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata>=* tag manually
4. Wikidata query: display the Wikidata SPARQL query."
What should we ask the developers to do so that this tool won't be
encouraging every to violate the Autom
.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 6:41 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:36 PM Mike N wrote:
>
>> On 9/22/2020 9:26 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> > The extra hamlet nodes are import remainders that haven't yet
>> been
&g
utside
databases are corrected, our data will be inaccurate as well, when it comes
to legal issues like boundaries.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 11:39 AM Bradley White
wrote:
> I echo this sentiment exactly as having taken place in California and in
>> my experiences with OSM
My goodness, look at that monstrosity:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1976405#map=8/46.459/-87.627
How can we claim that all of these patches of state-owned land constitute a
single OpenStreetMap feature?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:27 AM Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
The tag military=bunker is used not only for true bunkers, but for "any
kind of military installation built to withstand an attack." - quote from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dbunker
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:10 PM Bill Ricker wrote:
>
>
of land, that's just pure cadastre data. We might as well try to
map all the private land parcels and keep that information accurate - but
both tasks are too difficult, and the data is better provided by local
governments directly.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 9:50 PM Bradley White
of private/public land, there are no Forest Service signs at the
limits of private land.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:36 PM Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:11 PM Joseph Eisenberg <
> joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe there might
example with the Manistee National Forest, which used to be
mapped in a much simpler fashion and now has been re-made as many smaller
parcels.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 4:22 PM Clifford Snow
wrote:
> Paul,
> I don't have a definitive answer for you, but rendering usually
Is the track closed to everyone, or is it perhaps access=private, if the
landowner has access?
There is also a more specific tag for military bunkers: military=bunker
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Amilitary%3Dbunker
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:16 PM brad wrote
s a famous American reformer (Upton Sinclair) often said: "It is difficult
to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not
understanding it."
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:08 PM Mikel Maron wrote:
> Rory, I don't know about you, but I'm certa
We should not ask anyone to do 2 months development work for 2500 euros.
I believe this size grant is only enough for 1 to 2 weeks, based on
international prices (though
I do not have any paid experience in this field)
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:08 AM pangoSE wrote:
>
While the benefit of making Potlatch 2 on AIR is small, the cost is tiny.
2500 Euros is an insignificant price to pay for supporting an editor which
is still used by a couple of thousand long-term users.
I support this expenditure.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 10:05 AM Alexandre
No
Relations are not collections
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 9:23 AM Mike Thompson wrote:
> I have come across a number of examples[0] of route relations where all
> the trails in a given park have been put into a single relation. Is this a
> recommended use for route
It's perfectly reasonable to add surface=unpaved or similar based on aerial
imagery alone, if you have some experience in distinguishing different
surfaces of roads and tracks from aerial imagery.
Do you have evidence that most of the surface tags added by this user are
unreliable?
– Joseph
lly
in the relevant map style:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/style/admin.mss#L496
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:55 AM stevea wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2020, at 10:13 AM, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
> > It's not the tagging. Other relation
's gone. I also noticed that the Klamath National Forest
> is gone, as well.
>
> I'm glad to see august and more-technical members of OSM (Paul Norman,
> Joseph Eisenberg...) chiming into this thread.
>
> I am the most recent author of this relation. I made minor chang
Re: "recursion limits of the geometry assembler." - is this merely due to
the large number of inner and outer ways?
Is it related to the nodes that are shared by 2 outer ways?
– Joseph E.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:24 PM Paul Norman via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On
,
forestry etc., not for travel between settlements.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:17 AM John Whelan wrote:
> I've noticed a number of highways being changed in Africa from
> unclassified to track and from unclassified to tertiary.The ones I've
> noticed are Appl
nfo by parcel.
For example in Oregon you can get data at
https://www.oregon.gov/geo/Pages/sdlibrary.aspx
We should not try to map all land ownership data by parcel in OpenStreetMap.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:23 PM stevea wrote:
> Mike, I hadn't considered that, it di
to use nodes.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:36 AM Yury Yatsynovich
wrote:
> I saw addresses in SF mapped both ways -- some are mapped as nodes inside
> the buildings or on contours of buildings (as entrances); others are added
> directly on the ways/relations of
I mostly have mapped in parts of Indonesia where there was no data, and the
new road or river was mapped for the first time.
Usually I try to split roads and rivers every ~10 kilometers.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 8:46 AM Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.
You should check the measurement directly from aerial imagery in iD or
JOSM, or by visiting the location in person and measuring or estimating.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:24 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> since the complainer removed the source (google map)
You should check the measurement directly from aerial imagery in iD or
JOSM, or by visiting the location in person and measuring or estimating.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:24 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk...@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> since the complainer removed the source (google map)
gov/?page_id=405 - I believe this
is a boundary=protected_area
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 12:54 PM brad wrote:
> Good question. At first glance I don't think Leisure=park is wrong. The
> wiki is characteristically narrow since it says that it is green.
> lei
ant to know the legal zoning or property boundaries there are plenty of
data sources for that information, but OpenStreetMap is valueable because
it provides local knowledge of what is really there.
–Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:19 PM stevea wrote:
> Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
tag should be used in Seattle (or Portland, where
we have implemented similar short-term policies on "Neighborhood
Greenways") at this time. If the city redesigns these streets and lowers
the speed limit to 5 or 10 mph and legally allows pedestrians to use the
whole street at any times, th
imprecisely, and then later we can get it down to very precise
mapping of thin strips of trees and scrub between fields:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628402941 - if we want to
Joseph
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:48 PM stevea wrote:
> On May 28, 2020, at 5:12 PM, Joseph Eisenberg
>
rd just because it's allowed to plant a vineyard someday.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 3:51 PM stevea wrote:
> Mateusz Konieczny writes:
> > (quoting stevea)
> "treed farmland" or "heavily wooded residential" prove slightly
> problematic to
s) about these
> honorary/memorial names that aren't actually used but were created by some
> obscure congressional bill long ago.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Eisenberg
> Sent: May 26, 2020 2:54 PM
> To: Jack Armstrong
> Cc: Talk us
ted_States
But these can probably be tagged as "official_name=Ronald Reagan Highway":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan_Highway
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:15 PM Jack Armstrong
wrote:
>
> More than once in the past, users have attempted to “
I also think that it makes sense to have counties as admin_level=6 in
Connecticut and Rhode Island, if local people still know their counties and
the governments still recognize them for geographic, statistical and some
other legal purposes.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:42 PM
be mapped with coastline, since it is marine salt-water.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 7:57 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> has a ghosts water multipolygon,
>
> that keep moving over land.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi
Dear all,
Today, v5.2.0 of the OpenStreetMap Carto stylesheet (the default stylesheet
on the OSM website) has been released. Once changes are deployed on the
openstreetmap.org it will take couple of days before all tiles show the new
rendering.
Changes include:
- Add rendering for
I have removed the wikidata parameter from the Description template and
it's related documentation page.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
is passable by 2-track vehicles such as farm tractors,
logging trucks, or 4wd cars.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
(You might try the Tagging mailing list for questions about how to tag
something: tagg...@openstreetmap.org)
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:43 AM Kevin Broderick
wrote:
> Ideally, I'd say that m
.
Getting rid of the Wikidata parameter would solve this.--Andrew (talk)
06:26, 9 November 2018 (UTC)"
I've also noted that often the links are wrong, because a tag like
"craft=*" is not the same as the wikidata definition of "crafts".
.
— Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 8:20 AM Tom Lee via talk
wrote:
> At the risk of repeating others' words, I strongly encourage participants
> in this conversation to review the draft attribution guideline (
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Draft_Attribution_Guideline) and
&
It’s a database technically, but it’s a database purpose-built for making
maps. Hence the name OpenStreetMap.
The attribution goes on the map.
This is not a difficult requirement to meet.
—Joseph Eisenberg
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
/openstreetmap-carto/compare/v5.0.0...v5.1.0
As always, we welcome any bug reports at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
e database which includes
this information.)
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/3/20, Jack Armstrong wrote:
> The wiki for public_transport=stop_position states, “If the stop on the
> public transport route has a defined platform, there is no benefit in adding
> public_transport=stop_position.
than only in another website or
database, please make corrections.
Also see update of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approval_status
with this value.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/17/20, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I would like to add a new status to
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/
All style users who upgrade to v5.0.0 should re-import the rendering
database so that the changes to lua transformations will take effect.
Because of this requirement, it may take longer than usual for this
version to be implemented by the rendering servers for the "Standard"
map tile layer at
ccording to best
practices:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/18/20, Harald Schwarz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the creation of the object:* tagging was the result of many remarks and
> disscussions. Most people agreed that the addr
se users, but would not suggest that the tag
needs to be removed, and it might change status in the future based on
use by mappers.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/18/20, Jmapb wrote:
> On 3/17/2020 10:52 AM, Wayne Emerson, Jr. via talk wrote:
>> However, among your examples you cite "gnis:fea
d=* etc)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:gnis:feature_id
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q1607 - nhd-shp:fdate
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q1606 - nhd-shp:fcode
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
That's great, if you are committed to going back and changing all the
opening_hours again in a month or two.
But it could be a bad idea in the long term if there is no follow-up
to return the hours to the regular ones afterward.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/14/20, Eric Christensen via Talk-us wrote
akes it clear that I used Esri imagery to map the streams and
rivers, right?
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/10/20, Sören Reinecke via talk wrote:
> Hey
>
> some ideas about identifying such changes:
>
>
> Example changeset comment where a mapper did armchair mapping:
> Data upda
SM map data."
Lot's of buzz words there! But it sounds like it is a combination of
computer algorithms and human checking for vandalism and errors.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/10/20, Michal Migurski wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I’m writing to let you know about a new OpenStreetMap project Facebook just
)
If they are just 1 or 2 kilometers off, then it would be worth keeping
them with a fixme=* on each one for local mappers to correct the
location later.
But that doesn't sound like it is the case in this situation.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 3/10/20, Mario Frasca wrote:
> hello here,
>
> I wi
Is there any update about the attribution guidelines?
At this point is there a chance that further comments and concerns
will be addressed, or is this a "done deal", where community input is
no longer going to be considered?
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/19/20, Simon Poole wrote:
> Th
ent raster
tiles when requested.
If you want to see this happen, we could use more volunteers with the
time and ability to work out the issues.
See: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3201
- Joseph Eisenberg
* (I personally tried to stop rendering bays and straits a
user can pick the language in that case.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/24/20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 24. Feb 2020, at 11:44, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>>
>> We're not there yet though; we're kind of shouting down Tomek because
>> he's aggressi
Yuri, I did not find a way to open an issue about the bot
(https://github.com/Sophox/sophox/tree/metabot/metabot is a branch, so
any issues would appear to be about Sophox). Is there an appropriate
place to request changes, besides Talk:Date_items?
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/19/20, Mateusz
t;© OSM" for a tiny watch screen or
tiny map that is less than 200 pixels wide (but more than 100 pixels).
It should only be necessary to use a tiny icon with a link to a
separate page if the screen or image is less than 100 pixels wide.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/20/20, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
gible to me. Too many jargon terms. But I
will note that "Slippery slope" is a logical fallacy, whether you use
it to argue for stronger or weaker license enforcement and terms.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/19/20, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> Am 19.02.2
> IMHO attribution should always be required 1. on the map 2. in high contrast
Agreed.
The main problem is that mobile devices, which are by far the most
common ways of accessing maps around the world, are only required to
provide attribution after a click or swipe, or even just on app
startup
ere >500 created by bot over Christmas (Dec 25-26th), I think
it's unlikely anyone has reviewed the recently created data items over
the past few months. Most are content-free (key=value is the only
property), but some probably need to be checked.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/19/20, Frederik Ramm wr
page should be be created by the Editor
application at the time when the “description=“ is added.
Is there any technical reason that would not work?
Could a stub Wiki Tag: or Key: page be created instead or in addition?
- Joseph Eisenberg
___
talk maili
ion or
translation or in JOSM or iD directly, but couldn’t the Item:Q* page be
created at that time?
-Joseph Eisenberg
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ans to maintain, and the page names
are too obscure (Item: Q19947 is meaningless) to be scanned by humans.
Therefore, I propose that Yurikbot be changed to only add new data
items for documented tags which already have a wiki page in at least
one language. I do n
. That's the problem
with relying on automated translation software... it doesn't work
well.)
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/18/20, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> Since this issue is somewhat controversial, it would be best to create
> a proposal page to suggest the proper way to tag continents, oc
moving the English name=* tags for
continents and oceans, and perhaps for many of the seas, but it's
important to get consensus about a major edit like this)
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 2/18/20, Tomek wrote:
> W dniu 20-02-15 o 19:17, Steve Doerr pisze:
>> On 15/02/2020 17:35, Tomek wrote:
>&
Is it proper to use amenity=college? That tag was originally developed
for insitutes of "Further Education" in the UK, which are a bit
different than North American junior/community colleges. Is anyone
using amenity=university instead?
- Joseph Eisenberg
_
> “ they don't really use numbers for roads except internally”
If they do not post signs, and locals do not usually know the numbers, then
there should not be a ref for those provincial roads in Openstreetmap.
-Joseph Eisenberg
___
talk mailing l
unless
openstreetmap can improve the originally imported data by checking it
against reality.
Remember, this is the "good practice" page we are talking about
editing, not the "how things really are done" page: we want to focuse
on the "Gold Standard", best
Dear all,
Today, v4.25.0 of the OpenStreetMap Carto stylesheet (the default
stylesheet on the OSM website) has been released. Once changes are deployed
on the openstreetmap.org it will take couple of days before all tiles
show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Remove rendering of
sense now.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 1/16/20, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>
> maybe i asked it wrong, there is no way per say, it is a land fill and there
> is something on the top, but to the
>
> tracers looking at bing it looks flat but it is a big mountain, on the one
features: a one-line description is not enough to explain how a
tag is used.
And it's much easier to translate a new page all in one place, in the
text editor, than having to edit things in the wiki data item and also
then write out the page.
-Joseph Eisenberg
On 1/15/20, pang...@riseup.net wrote:
will not work for all USPS postal codes.
Joseph Eisenberg
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ub.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2278
Related to Bays/Straits:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3634
Joseph Eisenberg
On 1/13/20, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so we've heard a broad range of opinions here, and no doubt many things
&
se=retail as areas with clear boundaries.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 1/12/20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 01:30 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
> joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 2:49 AM Mateusz Konieczny
>>
>> wrot
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 2:49 AM Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> or to use tricks like the “place=neighbourhood” one (which is based on
> POIs rather than polygons)?
>
> It is certainly wrong to do this.
>
I think the “trick” here is referring to the stand at practice of mapping
all place= features
continents (with
Africa, Australia and Antarctica).
Geographically, Africa is connected to Asia, with only the artificial
Suez Canal as a barrier, so 4 continents is also logical.
Naming and dividing the oceans leads to similar issues.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 1/8/20, Mario Frasca wrote:
> On 07/
regularly scheduled places for the train to stop.
-Joseph Eisenberg
On 1/8/20, Clay Smalley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Over the last few months, I've been doing some systematic improvements to
> the passenger railway network across North America. Much of this has been
> filling out p
tag for
each region, it does not seem that there is enough support for that
idea to happen, so for now we need to have name=* tags for things that
are going to be rendered on global maps.
(Note that Openstreetmap-carto does not render the names of oceans,
continents and seas, but does ren
Deadline is 3 days from now? If the goal is to to include a wider variety
of people from many countries, a longer deadline and messages in many
languages would be a good idea.
-Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 7:40 PM Christine Karch
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> SotM WG is looking
, we could change the license to allow database users to
pay for the privelege of not providing appropriate attribution. But
right now this is not allowed by the current license.
Joseph Eisenberg
Disclosure: I have no personal financial interest in Openstreetmap,
though I do spend lots of time and
n usage, but official documents will use
the other way with "of" in the middle.
Joseph Eisenberg
On 12/28/19, Tod Fitch wrote:
> Based on this discussion and my own checking to see what search engines are
> doing with the data, I think it would be okay to move the alt_name tag value
&
search
applications only.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 12/28/19, stevea wrote:
> Right: I've wondered if short_name would be appropriate in this case. Our
> wiki says short_name would work, Joseph says "not," though I suppose it is
> ultimately up to the search machinery and what i
ary as the first result:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Josephine - and there is no
short alt_name or short_name.
So I think there is no reason to have this information duplicated if
we are just worried about search.
-Joseph Eisenberg
On 12/27/19, stevea wrote:
> I truly love the l
> new freeway was just renamed for a congress person
In this case “official_name=“ with the whole congresspersons name would be
good, keeping the commonly-used name in “name=“.
-Joseph
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
I agree that the current OpenStreetMap data is wrong.
For example, I grew up in the Klamath National Forest, and that area should
include the Marble Mountain wilderness, it’s shouldn’t be a hole in the
National Forest.
-Joseph
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:40 AM Tod Fitch wrote:
> If I am
Thank you for the correction. So highway=trunk in German is similar to
expressway=yes in the USA?
Joseph
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 6:49 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 21. Dec 2019, at 01:10, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
> >
> > Unfor
e to
work.
It's also helpful that mappers in Germany and Japan can help map my
area here in Indonesia, adding rivers, lakes and roads based on aerial
imagery. They would have trouble if they needed to learn the hundreds
of local languages in each part of Indonesia to tag things properly.
-Joseph Eisenbe
I imagine you are following the import guidelines?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 12/21/19, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'd like to let you know about a recent
motorroad=yes and expressway=yes,
rather than tagging all expressways and motorroads as highway=trunk no
matter their classification or significance in the road network. And
adding maxspeed=, surface=, lanes= and access= will allow routing
applications and specialized renderers to treat these roa
lanes=, surface,
maxspeed=, expressway=yes, and motorroad=yes
The latter two tags could be useful for rendering if they were applied
consistently.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 8:29 AM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:26 PM Joseph Eisenberg <
>
Trunks are rarely expressways in remote parts of the world. In Britain,
where this tag started, many highway=trunk roads are not expressways or
motorroads.
Joseph
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 8:22 AM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:18 PM Joseph Eisenberg <
>
I would use highway=trunk the whole way for consistency. In Canada the
connecting highway is also highway=trunk. This makes sense because AK 2 is
linking Fairbanks, the largest city in this part of Alaska, with All the
cities in Canada and the lower 48 States.
-Joseph
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at
nglish, French,
Russian and Spanish.
But there is no perfect solution, and as mentioned, most database
users will want to pick a localized name of the form "name:=" so
these tags should be added.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 12/5/19, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> 5 Dec 2019, 22:12 by to...@disroot.o
to the dataset - in this case by
subtracting those features which are already a very closely aligned to
a `highway` way.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On 11/15/19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019 um 12:41 Uhr schrieb Christoph Hormann
> >:
>
>> Because the basis of
Dear all,
Today, v4.24.0 of the OpenStreetMap Carto stylesheet (the default
stylesheet on the OSM website) has been released. Once changes are deployed
on the openstreetmap.org it will take couple of days before all tiles
show the new rendering.
Changes include:
- Create darker river-color for
1 - 100 von 152 matches
Mail list logo
