On 1 Nov 2009, at 17:58, Chris Hill wrote:
Christoph Böhme wrote:
And another update of NOVAM:
- Internet Explorer 8 should now work (make sure it is not in
compatibility mode). It is quite slow though compared to the other
browsers.
I'll try this out later.
- The naptan:Bearing tag
On 1 Nov 2009, at 20:40, Chris Morley wrote:
Christoph Böhme wrote:
And another update of NOVAM:
This seems to be useful tool and I like the addition of the bearing
symbols. But the current ones are equilateral triangles and three-way
ambiguous. The meaning can be worked out after a bit of
On 1 Nov 2009, at 22:09, Christoph Böhme wrote:
Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk schrieb:
Same on Safari Mac 4.0.3
I tried printing with Chrome (which uses Webkit too, I think). It
did print the map, but always moved it to Scotland first. Perhaps
Safari is less of a scottish
In addition to the rest of the answers in the thread you can double
click to centre the map then copy the shortlink and add ?m to the end
of the url (assuming that your using the default Mapnik layer
otherwise it's m).
Shaun
On 1 Nov 2009, at 14:16, Jason Cunningham wrote:
I asked early
On 1 Nov 2009, at 20:17, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyway, to resume all this discussion - PLEASE don't trace from photo
without permission for OSM, whatever your temptations are.
Permission from whom, and in what form?
I doubt that we would be able to help as we don't have information
like the weather, tire pressures, type of vehicle or similar.
Shaun
On 1 Nov 2009, at 21:12, Emilie Laffray wrote:
Hello,
it seems that a research group is asking for GPS data in order to
improve cars. I think it would be
On 29 Oct 2009, at 18:28, bernhard wrote:
Hi all
Is there an easy way to download all Tiles?
No, but you can generate them yourself:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapnik
Laptops are capable of rendering tiles live locally.
It's not just some GigaBytes, rather tens of TerraBytes.
I'm
On 28 Oct 2009, at 22:49, Christoph Böhme wrote:
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com schrieb:
On 27 Oct 2009, at 22:58, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Looking good, I'm thinking of adding timetable_case=yes/no/empty to
the list of required fields.
Good stuff - I have been through my local
On 27 Oct 2009, at 22:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/10/24 Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk
OpenCycleMap is a project by two members of the OSM community
(gravitystorm and randomjunk). It's great that people like it and
find
it useful, and it's a fantastic example of what
sudo gem install geo
or some other similar gem.
Shaun
On 26 Oct 2009, at 18:24, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use osm2midi[1] on a small piece of data, but fue to my
ifnorance of ruby, I stumble upon this:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
Andy Robinson is the person to speak to. Ideally buy a batch for your
local mappers too. I have about 7 in London if anyone around London
(or whereever I'm likely to be next) wants one.
Shaun
On 25 Oct 2009, at 19:54, Mike Ryan wrote:
Hi All
I remember once that someone did some
On 24 Oct 2009, at 10:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/10/23 Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk:
Dave F. wrote:
Could it be possible to change the render a the highest detail
level or
two, to display the C+number. In the example you give it they would
certainly fit.
Hi Edward,
You need a capacity of at least 20 before it is shown. The reason for
needing a larger number of spaces before it was rendered with a big C
was due to places like http://www.opencyclemap.org/?zoom=18lat=51.49685lon=-0.12529layers=B000
where it would show lots of blue C's beside
It is probably due to a fresh planet import.
http://matt.sandbox.cloudmade.com is currently up to date.
Shaun
On 23 Oct 2009, at 15:21, Ian Caldwell wrote:
I put a few roads in last night and when I checked them this morning
they were missing from the level 14,15,16 in Maplink. I then added
On 23 Oct 2009, at 18:02, Christopher Covington wrote:
From the wiki,
Parking spaces along streets are currently not tagged. Only parking
lots of reasonable size are mapped, not every place where a car
could be
parked.
Is there any solution to this? At, for example, the student
Hi,
Do you have some examples?
Shaun
On 22 Oct 2009, at 14:00, Bev M Ewen-Smith wrote:
Hi,
I am getting reports from users looking at OSM in different towns in
UK, of randomly disappearing streets.
Is there some mischief afoot?
Regards
Bev
Examples:
Sands Road, Gap Road and Gap Crescent
On 22 Oct 2009, at 14:19, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Shaun,
You mean the examples Bev gave aren't good enough?
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Shaun McDonald
Sent: 22 October 2009 2
Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Shaun McDonald
Sent: 22 October 2009 14:39
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Cc: osm-talk Talk; Bev M Ewen-Smith
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Randomly disappearing streets
Hi Bev,
Rather I
On 21 Oct 2009, at 09:44, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Peter Childs schrieb:
Yes But,
If a Pub is tagged
amenity=pub
disused=yes
The thing looks like a put (ie large pub like lables) hence
works relatively well as a land mark, it just happens to be closed
and
does not sell Beer anymore. Its still
On 21 Oct 2009, at 18:58, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Sure, so lets get that page showing how things should be onto the
wiki
I think we've got that bit already:
On 20 Oct 2009, at 12:05, Lesi wrote:
how will you tag unmined deposits in such a scheme?
If there is a unmined deposit, the mineshaft is not in use anymore
- disused=yes
Do NOT use something like disused=yes as a modifier, you instead need
to add an extra level of indirection, so that
On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:44, Lesi wrote:
On 20 Oct 2009, at 12:05, Lesi wrote:
how will you tag unmined deposits in such a scheme?
If there is a unmined deposit, the mineshaft is not in use anymore
- disused=yes
Do NOT use something like disused=yes as a modifier, you instead
need to
In Potlatch select the way and then hit the h key or click the number
in the lower left to get to the same dialog.
Shaun
On 19 Oct 2009, at 18:17, MP wrote:
I encountered way http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30722618
From history it seems it was probably some forest before someone
barrier=hedge is what I would use.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge
Shaun
On 17 Oct 2009, at 08:50, David ``Smith'' wrote:
Does anyone have a suggestion on mapping/tagging the lines of trees
that tend to be found along rural property lines?
Example:
When would that be appropriate? A link to a photo would be useful.
Shaun
On 17 Oct 2009, at 14:51, Anthony wrote:
Along with foot=yes if appropriate?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
barrier=hedge is what I would use.
http
the aerial, it's not clear whether or not that's the case.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
When would that be appropriate? A link to a photo would be useful.
Shaun
On 17 Oct 2009, at 14:51, Anthony wrote:
Along with foot=yes if appropriate
I've just added http://blog.osmfoundation.org/ to http://blogs.openstreetmap.org/
(Yep watch that s again)
Shaun
On 16 Oct 2009, at 11:06, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
OSMF has established a new Blog which will be used to communicate
official
announcements and other OSM
On 15 Oct 2009, at 12:09, Peter Miller wrote:
Does anyone know if the London Congestion zone boundary included in
OSM? I can find it on a quick inspection of part of the boundary.
Which part of the boundary can you find it? Unless you meant can't in
your last sentence. ;-)
Also note
On 13 Oct 2009, at 12:04, Claudius wrote:
True. In german we say Schutzhütte (losely translates as protection
hut) and the german wikipedia article shows good examples in
pictures:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzhütte (ignore the one in the lower
right corner). These shelters are only
On 13 Oct 2009, at 16:35, Gilles Corlobé wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
Envoyé : mardi 13 octobre 2009 16:38
À : Gilles Corlobé
Cc : talk@openstreetmap.org
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal
- RFC - (boundary=military)
Gilles
On 7 Oct 2009, at 11:06, Lars Francke wrote:
I'm sure someone else will be able to better answer this question but
it seems as if moderators and administrators are able to block
certain users from using the API.
Additionaly it seems as if there are now different roles for users:
administrators
Sorry, I'm a little too far away, in Dumfries for the Mapping Party
here, so if anyone in the central belt or north England wants to come
along, please do.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dumfries/MappingParty2009-10
Shaun
On 10 Oct 2009, at 06:15, Peter Childs wrote:
There is a
On 8 Oct 2009, at 10:39, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
oneway=no might be useful in the very rare case that mappers for
some reason keep marking a road as oneway, but it's actually not!
But I'd expect a note= to be more appropriate. Other than that, I
agree it and noexit=no
On 6 Oct 2009, at 21:24, Frankie Roberto wrote:
2009/10/6 Steve Chilton s.l.chil...@mdx.ac.uk
I am pleased to announce that the first of the OS 7th series out-of-
copyright maps are available for use in OSM.
Very brief details of the sheets and how to access them is available
on the wiki
On 3 Oct 2009, at 17:42, Mike N. wrote:
It needs to follow the road way to some extent, but it might be
possible
to simplify by reducing node count so that it doesn't exactly follow
the
road. In the samples I have seen, house placement is much
different than
the road path when
On 3 Oct 2009, at 17:42, Mike N. wrote:
It needs to follow the road way to some extent, but it might be
possible
to simplify by reducing node count so that it doesn't exactly follow
the
road. In the samples I have seen, house placement is much
different than
the road path when
On 29 Sep 2009, at 11:21, Claudius wrote:
Anyone (*blinking at Frankie*) knows how long it will takes after
adding
the osm machine tag untile the View in OpenStreetMap (btw. I think
that link should be written without spaces) link appears straight
below
the picture? And how long about the
Photos would be really, really useful for examples.
On 29 Sep 2009, at 13:33, Anthony wrote:
I have to admit I'm curious. What are the signs for that, and where
are they?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Nakor nakor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am wondering how you can map that when you
On 27 Sep 2009, at 20:06, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/9/26 bernhard b...@datenkueche.com:
The geolocation API in iPhone Safari does not give the correct
position.
Can somebody confirm that iPhone Safari has no access to GPS?
did you try to contact Microsoft support?
Why would
On 25 Sep 2009, at 09:04, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Hi Dave,
Some people have found more luck getting a GPS signal in the
carriage ends (I believe they're called the vestibules?) - however
it's a pretty uncomfortable journey stood their the entire time.
Yes it called a vestibule.
On 25 Sep 2009, at 15:27, Dave F. wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/09/09 13:16, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of
way,
and its associated
Another bad thing about that bot is that it is producing a changeset
for each edit, with nearly 10 changesets per minute.
On 25 Sep 2009, at 16:49, Pieren wrote:
Dear list,
A bot running under the user name BugBuster is currently modifying
many closed ways and remove nodes listed twice,
On 23 Sep 2009, at 23:50, Peter Miller wrote:
On 23 Sep 2009, at 19:32, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I was out checking a few bus stops in East Lothian
(cycling from Musselburgh out along the coast to North Berwick).
Pretty much all of them had no information other than a flag which
On 24 Sep 2009, at 09:04, John Smith wrote:
2009/9/24 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk:
We?
The talk-au list
Anyway, you all seem to have missed source=User Defined on map
It also says on the map features page:
You can use any tags you like as long as the values are verifiable.
However, there
On 24 Sep 2009, at 12:54, John Smith wrote:
2009/9/24 Someoneelse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
I think that it's easy to get too prescriptive...
I'm not suggesting anyone do any of that, I'm pointing out how silly
it is to say gps is more precise than saying survey.
A survey could mean
On 20 Sep 2009, at 20:27, Timothy C Litwiller wrote:
county highway = residential surface=paved smoothness=good
poor county highway = residential surface=paved smoothness=bad
Please don't use smoothness=* as it is not a descriptive tag.
Shaun
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
You'll find that this has been talked about on the talk-gb and the
talk-transit mailing lists as they are not of global importance,
rather just nation UK importance.
Shaun
On 21 Sep 2009, at 10:06, Mike Harris wrote:
Hi
Can someone expand a little on what is happening with the NaPTAN bus
On 21 Sep 2009, at 14:34, Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Guenther Meyer d@sordidmusic.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 07:16:45AM +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Hi, I haven't seen billiard and snooker tags. Have you tagged any
billiard club, and if you have
On 21 Sep 2009, at 15:22, Norbert Hoffmann wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
sport = billard
billard = pool
or
sport = billard
billard = snooker
There are currently no such tags in OSM Wiki, should we suggest
these
tags ot is it ok to just start using them? How will then other
people
know
On 21 Sep 2009, at 16:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/9/21 Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk:
The documentation comes after some significant usage of the tag.
There is no
need to spend time documenting everything straight away.
yes, and if different approaches for the same
There is more information available on this wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Planet.osm/FAQ
Shaun
On 21 Sep 2009, at 20:33, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
I tried to import planet-090916.osm.bz2 into the postgres database
using osmosis, using empty schema from:
URL:
On 18 Sep 2009, at 15:13, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Then, make a node on each track to represent where the trains stop.
There can be more than one of these if there are a few stopping
points (eg platform 1a, 1b). Tag this railway=stop.
All of these stopping points, plus the platforms,
On 18 Sep 2009, at 17:42, Peter Miller wrote:
We then have enough information for people to play trains!
If the station has multiple levels then each element should have a
layer tag and we will need to consider how one manages a single level
(concourse) where one side has a level entrance to
Nice article, though I'm sure there is an inaccuracy there as the
Royal Mail don't actually know the exact locations of the post boxes,
instead they have a rough description which was provided through the
FOI.
Shaun
On 17 Sep 2009, at 10:48, Bob Kerr wrote:
Hi all,
Just in case you
On 16 Sep 2009, at 10:35, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Miércoles, 16 de Septiembre de 2009, Łukasz Jernaś escribió:
2009/9/16 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
With this and the new hi-viz vests, we could re-launch the OSM
merchandiseparaphernalia shop.
New hi-viz vests? Were and
On 16 Sep 2009, at 15:42, Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:14:15 +0200, Ben Laenen wrote:
The only thing highway=path says is that wide vehicles like cars
can't
drive there.
How do you differentiate from path and footpath tag? What is the
difference between them? Can you
Hi,
If you have any presentations from last years SOTM uploaded to
slideshare or similar, can you please add the link to it from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2008#Presentations
?
Shaun
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 15 Sep 2009, at 22:48, Thomas Wood wrote:
ref/local_ref has been argued here in the past, I can't remember the
reason for settling on the latter, I personally prefer the former.
ref should be a national reference whilst local_ref is a reference on
a more local basis, in this case usually
On 12 Sep 2009, at 19:05, Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
Steve Chilton wrote:
Friend is thinking of getting Nokia N97
Can it save GPS tracks for OSM uploading?
Can you use OSM maps on it in any way?
No info on N97 on OSM wiki.
You can use all the Java options available for other phones, which has
: ramp:luggage=yes|automatic|manual didn't see may of those..
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
I have used bicycle=yes where there is a guide rail to help people
take
their bike up and over the steps/bridge.
Shaun
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On 11 Sep 2009, at 17:10, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
I have used bicycle=yes where there is a guide rail to help people
take
their bike up and over the steps/bridge.
It's a matter of definition, I guess. My opinion is that the OSM
vehicle
class bicycle doesn't include
On 10 Sep 2009, at 11:21, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:05 PM, John Smith
deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/10 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
Because of the presence of the bicycle symbol on the ground, I'd say
highway=cycleway;bicycle=designated;foot=yes. If that
On 10 Sep 2009, at 19:40, Richard Weait wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Steve
Chiltons.l.chil...@mdx.ac.uk wrote:
I don't know whether I have missed something, or else am just
lucky, but mapnik is rendering the things I am editing super-fast.
Two new and different renders of
On 9 Sep 2009, at 17:00, Ian Dees wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Does the osmify bookmarklet
http://blog.johnmckerrell.com/2007/12/31/new-version-of-osmify-bookmarklet/
work in the Monopoly game?
No. It appears that they might be using a special
On 9 Sep 2009, at 17:16, Ian Dees wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk
wrote:
The game is built using Flash so the osmify bookmarklet won't work
as it needs the javascript api instead.
The game is built entirely with JavaScript and HTML
On 8 Sep 2009, at 12:21, Someoneelse wrote:
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Martes, 8 de Septiembre de 2009, John Smith escribió:
2009/9/8 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
It would be very nice to have JOSM add a source tag to the
changeset if a
WMS layer has been used during
On 8 Sep 2009, at 22:21, Eric Wolf wrote:
Further, you should only be using satellite imagery to generate OSM
data if the copyright has been released for that purpose (like
Yahoo's imagery in the US) or if the imagery is provided without
restriction (like USGS imagery).
Why do you
On 9 Sep 2009, at 00:02, Ian Dees wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-
kbc.org wrote:
On Wednesday 09 Sep 2009 2:40:49 am Anthony wrote:
Is it okay to use Google Street View to confirm turning
restrictions,
street names, etc? This seems like an obvious yes
On 7 Sep 2009, at 16:57, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
Thanks Shaun. I thought I'd have to find an example outside the UK.
Next time I travel on the tram I'll pay attention to traffic
restrictions instead of trying to fix some no-name streets.
:-)
I did think of another restriction, which
Hi,
You could use Osmosis to import the daily diffs and crop the data to
just india.
Shaun
On 4 Sep 2009, at 08:02, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
Hi,
I have a server serving India specific data from OSM. I need to
update the data
on a daily basis, whereas my current source for India data is
On 4 Sep 2009, at 17:08, Ed Avis wrote:
I think I'll still use my Garmin GPS for recording tracks, since I
presume it
has better sensitivity than the Blackberry's builtin GPS, but I
think you could
use this app to record traces too. I haven't dug around to see if
it lets you
export
On 4 Sep 2009, at 17:51, Ed Avis wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
[TMJ-Mobile app on Blackberry]
If your blackberry has bluetooth, you could use a bluetooth
GPS instead of the built in GPS.
I have a Garmin unit with USB - I wonder if I can connect that
somehow?
After all the Blackberry
On 31 Aug 2009, at 10:14, Jon Burgess wrote:
2009/8/31 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
There's a curious Mapnik problem in Peckham, London:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.47008mlon=-0.06592zoom=16layers=B000FTF
That industrial park has been split into two halves at that
particular
On 27 Aug 2009, at 00:15, Chris Fleming wrote:
On 26/08/09 16:29, Callum Noble wrote:
Hi Bob,
Sounds like a good idea.
I organized a meetup in Glasgow back in Feb '08. There were a few
Edinburgh people came through but in the end there weren't as many
people came as had posted to the list
On 24 Aug 2009, at 09:35, Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Nice to see it popular, however...
a few of us like to use a twitter search for openstreetmap to see
what humans are saying but recently pretty much all of the tweets we
receive for this search are from these bots.
Would it
When I'm fixing these, I just delete one of the ways in OSM and make
sure that all the other connections are correct. It really doesn't
matter about the tiger tags. As I don't know where there are county
boundaries, I've just been leaving them as is (though occasionally
been having to move
On 24 Aug 2009, at 18:56, Alexander Klink wrote:
Sorry, didn't think about that. I've changed the bot to use
osm.org, my bots will use that right away, I hope the other
bot owners will update as well.
8-)
There currently isn't a shortlink for the browse pages. Instead
you'll
need to use
On 22 Aug 2009, at 11:48, John Smith wrote:
--- On Sat, 22/8/09, Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
Not really. There's a lot of elevation data available in the GPS
traces, and since roads where incline=* is relevant are drawn along
GPS traces, it's a matter of exploiting that
Have you tried logging in?
Could you please try using the Lost Password form:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/forgot-password
Shaun
On 21 Aug 2009, at 10:36, Mike Harris wrote:
Hi
Kein Sprachproblem! Nur dass ich wüsste nicht, wie ich könnte sein
Problem erlösen!
Mit freundlichen
On 17 Aug 2009, at 16:42, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
To the left of those, you'll see a couple of yellow foldable
thingamajig. They
are supposed to stay folded at ground level to allow traffic, and
they can
be deployed up and locked up (with a key) in order to prevent any
vehicles
from
On 15 Aug 2009, at 00:38, Michal Migurski wrote:
Cool!
I made the mistake of ignoring my OSM-talk mail for a few days, I'm
really happy to see that people are thinking of ways to work with
Walking Papers. I've been building up some steam to work on another
set of change requests, now's the
On 13 Aug 2009, at 22:07, Liz wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Nick Black wrote:
I'm proposing having an open call on Monday 17th August at 6pm BST
at which
anyone interested can talk through their comments or concerns, as
we did in
Amsterdam during SOTM. I know that this is short notice
Mappers have in the past put in stubs with a few nodes tailing off, to
state that there is something here that needs to be surveyed further.
Shaun
On 14 Aug 2009, at 09:52, Mike Harris wrote:
Good idea - but can we do it simply by adding the stub of a way at the
relevant point?
Mike Harris
On 12 Aug 2009, at 11:16, John Smith wrote:
--- On Wed, 12/8/09, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, there is a way. You simply need to go
to the area.
More seriously, I don't see the point of this question
since all data that we are supposed to collect are based on
facts
On 12 Aug 2009, at 07:02, John Smith wrote:
--- On Wed, 12/8/09, Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
There is no consent on which way to go to express the
strict use case.
Does there need to be?
Not that this implies that I agree or disagree but strictly from a
technical point of view all you
On 12 Aug 2009, at 10:51, Liz wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
No. You should use highway=cycleway;bicycle=no if you have a cycle
path that you cannot walk on. Routing software already supports this.
They don't support routing cyclists over the highway=path. Are you
really
On 11 Aug 2009, at 08:35, Maarten Deen wrote:
Andre Hinrichs wrote:
Hi List,
I just discovered, that the whole site seems to be down including
www,api,gpx
Hope, that mail is working. I will update the status at wiki to DOWN
now. Please change if site is available again.
Everything
On 11 Aug 2009, at 09:20, Lauri Kytömaa wrote:
Roy Wallace wrote:
Is tagging the primary users intended to use the way verifiable? If
not, it shouldn't be tagged. If it is, then is footway/cycleway
As fine as it as a guideline, verifiability as a topic and was
introduced into the wiki only
On 11 Aug 2009, at 16:03, Markus Lindholm wrote:
2009/8/8 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Mike Harris wrote:
And I still don't think turnstile is in any way a type of stile
any more than a stile is a type of gate.
+1
The English word for turnstiles may end with stile for some
reason
On 11 Aug 2009, at 17:12, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/11 Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk:
Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass
in
only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a
turnstile
is just a node I have no idea.
A footway
On 11 Aug 2009, at 17:39, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Another property that turnstiles have is that usually one can pass
in
only one direction. But how that is going to be tagged if a
turnstile
is just a node I have no idea.
A footway going through it with the tag oneway
On 11 Aug 2009, at 18:01, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
oneway=yes isn't a good idea, as oneway is generally assumed to /
not/
affect pedestrians. (Or how many of you actually add an exception
for
pedestrians when mapping a highway with oneway=yes?)
The exception being
On 11 Aug 2009, at 06:41, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 Aug 2009, at 23:09, Bogus Zaba wrote:
With Denbighshire however I made a new relation (192442) and am
slowly
adding various ways that will make up this boundary. Not sure however
how to edit the Denbighshire entry in the wiki to add
Hi Tom,
This is being discussed on the talk-transit mailing list:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Thomas Wood who is doing the import is on holiday for a couple of
weeks at the moment if I remember right.
Progress status will be available on
On 10 Aug 2009, at 18:51, David Earl wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Ito OSM Mapper has reported no changes in Cambridge since 3/8,
otherwise
I'd have spotted this sooner. In fact, I've got no sessions recorded
for
any of the areas I'm monitoring since 4/8 - Peter, do you know why?
The
It would be interesting to see the same charts taking into account the
nonames, to take into account the places that have been traced but not
yet named.
Shaun
On 10 Aug 2009, at 23:35, Peter Reed wrote:
I have now fixed the problem I was having with measuring the length
of roads in
This has been discussed before on this list.
See thread:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-June/037891.html
And the dev list:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2009-May/015566.html
Shaun
On 9 Aug 2009, at 09:57, Steve Hill wrote:
I noticed that there seems to be
On 7 Aug 2009, at 12:46, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/4 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
Talking with my friends in Kosovo
the laptops are underpowered and hang using JOSM
the laptops are underpowered and hang using the browser and hence
Potlatch the
On 7 Aug 2009, at 00:06, Mark Williams wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
This is the A13 and it in the ncn13 relation which I think is wrong
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23406798
Any thoughts? Anyone fancy following it up?
Actually no, the NCN13 route _IS_ down the A13! Bizarre but
On 6 Aug 2009, at 12:06, John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Routers can look for an abutters tag just as easily as
using an urban area polygon.
The abutters tag is dwindling in use as landuse polygons should be
used
201 - 300 di 597 matches
Mail list logo
