Re: [OSM-talk] Welcome box on the new map page

On 18:17 2013-12-01, SomeoneElse wrote: The changeset close time has a dotted underline and the mouse pointer changes from a hand to a question mark - I still don't know what this is supposed to signify. That's HTML's abbr tag. It's primarily meant to give abbr title=three-letter

Re: [OSM-talk] Welcome box on the new map page

On 00:35 2013-12-02, Christian Quest wrote: Where have the translations gone ? The welcome, help and about are now english only ? This is the most critical point in this switch that looks a bit premature to me. The OSM website is translated at translatewiki.net. Every time an interface

Re: [OSM-talk] Long tail challenges - was: Re: Bitcoin Spam

On 17:53 2013-12-03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: besides the bitcoin tag there is a name, a website, a phone number and a human readable note. Clicking on the website you'll also get an adress (housenumber). On 19:06 2013-12-03, Steve Bennett wrote: There's no way OSM really wants to be a

Re: [OSM-talk] Not attaching polygons to roads

On 16:02 2014-02-21, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:29 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com mailto:molto...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with the matter of taste argument insofar as I dont complain to mappers who initially glue areas to lines. It's just data that can

Re: [OSM-talk] Not attaching polygons to roads

On 01:36 2014-02-23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am 23/feb/2014 um 00:44 schrieb Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us: A residential subdivision here will often place a decorative fence or hedge along the road, with a sidewalk in front of it, but the subdivision maintains everything up

Re: [OSM-talk] Canadian OSM POI quality

On 2014-06-08 21:57, Paul Norman wrote: Inconsistent tagging was observed with some shops, such as variability between amenity=restaurant and amenity=fast_food. This should reflect differences between locations but may not. Inconsistent names were also observed, such as Walmart, Wal-mart, and

Re: [OSM-talk] Come back Osmarender, all is forgiven!

On 2014-06-23 20:14, Russ Nelson wrote: The only complaints I see about the standard map are the ones coming from railfans who want to see the abandoned railroads put back. I'm still holding my breath for landuse labels at z14... [1] [1]

Re: [OSM-talk] Own wikipage for every single speed limit??

On 2014-08-28 04:37, Jochen Topf wrote: Redirect pages can have a bad effect, though. Taginfo will show if a wiki page exists for a key or tag. Taginfo can't know why there is a redirect. Is this a case where the redirect directs from a typo page to the real page or is this a case where, like in

Re: [OSM-talk] Own wikipage for every single speed limit??

On 2014-09-05 13:22, Jochen Topf wrote: On Fr, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:51:40 -0700, Minh Nguyen wrote: On 2014-08-28 04:37, Jochen Topf wrote: Redirect pages can have a bad effect, though. Taginfo will show if a wiki page exists for a key or tag. Taginfo can't know why there is a redirect

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM tiles under CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia requires 2.5 or later

On 2014-11-20 13:57, Leeds Tracker wrote: Hello all, I was about to upload a map exported from the main site (SVG using Mapnik style) which I see is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 Wikimedia Common's upload page requires 2.5, 3.0 or 4.0 (using

Re: [OSM-talk] Request for feedback: new building colours in openstreetmap-carto

On 2014-11-28 14:37, Mihkel Rämmel wrote: By making all religious buildings highly visible on the current buildings demo style it makes a great style to use when you want to visit all the religious places nearby but nothing else. I do not know about the rest of the world but at least in a

Re: [OSM-talk] wiki history function problem?

On 2014-12-20 02:18, Richard Z. wrote: Hi, since some time the wiki history (show diffs between versions) always displays empty changesets for me: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Date_namespacediff=1119628oldid=1119586 displays an empty box and says (Nessuna differenza)

Re: [OSM-talk] wiki history function problem?

On 2014-12-20 03:15, Tom Hughes wrote: On 20/12/14 10:44, Tom Hughes wrote: On 20/12/14 10:18, Richard Z. wrote: displays an empty box and says (Nessuna differenza) which is clearly wrong. Did anyone else notice the problem? I am logged in and have my settings to only display diffs, not full

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposal - automate rendering examples on OSM wiki

On 2015-03-24 04:09, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: Is there any kind of API enabled for OSM wiki allowing automated uploads of files? The OSM wiki can transclude images from Wikimedia Commons, which has a process for batch uploading images:

Re: [OSM-talk] New features in iD - looking for feedback and beta testers..

On 2015-03-27 14:55, Dave F. wrote: Until there's a logical, common sense way to select, split, continue unstitch ways that meet at intersections, I'm sticking with P2. As a power user, I found these operations a lot less frustrating after discovering that selecting a way, holding down

Re: [OSM-talk] Can wikidata links help fight name inflation?

Phil phil at trigpoint.me.uk writes: Transliteration is something that can be done at application level, and a traveller would have learned the basics. You still need to be able to check the street names against.what is on the sign. Then why not have a single transliteration? A single cryllic

Re: [OSM-talk] Can wikidata links help fight name inflation?

On 2015-05-31 14:19, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: On 30/05/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: It seems that for names nobody cares to say whether they are signposted or not (or maybe only when the sign is different from the actual name), while for ref it seems common

Re: [OSM-talk] The Proposed Great Colour Shift

On 2015-08-21 03:13, Colin Smale wrote: While we are at it, what about specific symbols for train/metro stations per operator? That is also a great landmark for map users. I'd love to see that in the Transportation map. The difference with highway shields is that the Standard style is already

Re: [OSM-talk] The Proposed Great Colour Shift

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org writes: Along these lines, the standard style as it isn't too far off from what Americans expect out of a motorist-oriented roadmap (though mapgeeks might see it as a bit German by comparison to our maps).  Surface streets tend to be all the same color

Re: [OSM-talk] The Proposed Great Colour Shift

Lester Caine lester at lsces.co.uk writes: Just what is the convention in the US, Russia or China? Regarding the U.S., Paul and I describe the conventions here in detail: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-August/073892.html But the short version is: real highway shields.

Re: [OSM-talk] open question about boundaries sharing nodes with ways or nodes

Mike Thompson gmail.com> writes: > > Sometimes, such as in the case of the boundary between the US states of Ohio and Kentucky, it is the low water mark on one bank[1] (in this case the court held that it was the low water mark of the north bank of the Ohio River in 1792, not the present low

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

instead of a larger, recurring task. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/wikidata and previous threads on this list -- Minh Nguyen <m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

Martin Koppenhoefer gmail.com> writes: > > > sent from a phone > > > Il giorno 10 giu 2016, alle ore 01:58, Minh Nguyen nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> ha scritto: > > > > > > * “Administrative territorial entity” is the superset of “human > > set

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

Martin Koppenhoefer gmail.com> writes: > > > sent from a phone > > > Il giorno 09 giu 2016, alle ore 02:23, Minh Nguyen nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> ha scritto: > > > > If I understand correctly, you’re referring to a situation where, for > > instanc

Re: [OSM-talk] iD news: v1.9.6 released

(Sorry, I sent from the wrong address, so this message got stuck in moderation.) Martin Koppenhoefer gmail.com> writes: > > > > Sorry that it took me a while to reply, I was out of office and just came back now. > > > Il giorno 10 giu 2016, all

Re: [OSM-talk] Could we just pause any wikidata edits for a month or two?

On 15/10/2017 05:39, Michael Reichert wrote: And even if detecting disambiguation pages in Wikipedia would miss too much of them, you could use Wikidata to check if the Wikipedia page the Wikidata item points to is a disambiguation page according to Wikidata? While wroting the paragraph above,

Re: [OSM-talk] Could we just pause any wikidata edits for a month or two?

Great questions. I've attempted to answer a few of them below: On 03/10/2017 09:56, Christoph Hormann wrote: * To what extent has there been information transferred systematically from Wikidata and Wikipedia to OSM based on wikidata ID references (like adding names in different languages). As

Re: [OSM-talk] Bot edits on the OSM wiki

On 2019-02-24 11:18, Christoph Hormann wrote: Yesterday was the first time (that i am ware of at least) a bot has edited an OSM wiki page on my watchlist - with today and yesterday combined 17 edits of tag and key pages spamming my watchlist feed. I'm not sure if it's on by default, but

Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today

Vào lúc 06:40 2022-10-25, Marc_marc đã viết: when to migrate the data to ohm, I am convinced. however, having tested it this month, it's horribly non-ergonomic and I don't believe for a moment that it's within the reach of an iD contributor nor of an average contributor with josm, unless a

Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today

Vào lúc 16:41 2022-10-26, Zeke Farwell đã viết: On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 1:11 PM Greg Troxel > wrote: I think people should keep in mind that a culture of deltionism is demoralizing to contributors and harms OSM more than a few  marginal items in the

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of "Proprietary" imagery to edit OSM

Vào lúc 07:11 2022-10-30, Greg Troxel đã viết: But then the company doing the editing should document which company's imagery and which revision year they are using. Things should be as transparent as possible, and this doesn't feel that way. There was a recent subthread on this issue on the

Re: [OSM-talk] remove link to Wikidata from infoboxes is a valid arg to remove it from wiki page and data items ?

Vào lúc 08:46 2022-09-30, Andrew Hain đã viết: The Wikidata links haven’t gone away; they’re in the OSM data items where they are easily machine readable and can be curated against accidental divergences between languages. The other description arguments could just as easily follow (there’s no

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

Vào lúc 00:59 2023-01-03, Simon Poole đã viết: Not quite unexpected this discussion has already gone off on a tangent about stable ids. My question on the other hand would be: what do you actually want to achieve and what would you expect an application to do with the parameter? Furthermore,

Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template)

Vào lúc 06:49 2022-11-29, Simon Poole đã viết: Am 29.11.2022 um 15:30 schrieb Greg Troxel:    It seems obvious that asking a US entity to enter into a contract under foreign law (and the same is almost certainly true for any government entity in any other jurisdiction) is just not going to

Re: [OSM-talk] StateOTMap 2015 video is "private"

orry again for the inconvenience! [1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqjPa29lMiE2IlsRsfhi1aFGZfQLQDCrS [2] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqjPa29lMiE17qqIDxgONEMVkHzYjtLtW -- Minh Nguyen President, OpenStreetMap U.S. Board of Directors ___ ta

Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template)

Vào lúc 15:48 2022-11-28, Tobias Knerr đã viết: On 28.11.22 at Simon Poole wrote: What is "OSM Contributor Terms compatibility" supposed to be? Ok, this is clearly imprecise wording.¹ The context is that we would like to offer data donors a standard legal text that they can use to make

Re: [OSM-talk] StateOTMap 2015 video is "private"

as we hear about them, but apparently changing them en masse would spam the channel's followers with notifications. (These videos are all wonderful, but not all of them are evergreen!) I'll follow up with our staff and hope to get your video sorted out shortly. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Re: [OSM-talk] StateOTMap 2015 video is "private"

Vào lúc 14:21 2022-12-01, Michał Brzozowski đã viết: > but apparently changing them en masse would spam the channel's followers with notifications. ( Are you sure? If you upload a video (which in many contexts works like making it public) you can choose not to notify the subscribers. I found

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

Vào lúc 05:42 2023-06-27, Yves via talk đã viết: That would be again discussing with the proponent, as Brian started. Taginfo chronology already show one mass edit and revert, best to make sure there's not another waste of energy beforehand. The mass edit and revert were performed by the same

Re: [OSM-talk] Intercultural differences / cultural diversity / OSM communication behaviors

Vào lúc 19:03 2023-05-03, Imre Samu đã viết: In addition to this, new OSM community members should be prepared for the potential culture shock they may encounter, especially those who come from a top-down corporate environment. It's important to remember that OpenStreetMap is characterized by

Re: [Talk-vi] Talk-vi Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1

Ngày 2012-04-18 4:05 AM, Lê Thanh viết: Chao anh Minh anh co the gui lai bang tieng Viet khong dau duoc khong? Thu anh gui bi loi, khong doc duoc. Thanh Chao cac ban, Toi da xay dung lai trang dau tieng Viet tai OpenStreetMap Wiki. [1] Trang nay co khung ban do thay doi hang ngay. Bay gio

Re: [Talk-vi] BẢN ĐỒ OSM GHI QUẦN ĐẢO HOÀNG SA LÀ SANSHA CỦA TRUNG QUỐC

://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2003113136 [4] http://mlm.jochentopf.com/?zoom=1lat=0lon=0layers=B0Tlang=vi -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-vi mailing list Talk-vi@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Talk-ca] Can-Amera border, states and provinces.

with fewer twists and turns will show up lighter when zoomed out. That is, Mapnik doesn't perform any smoothing on country boundaries yet. Also, changeset 17070 [1] sounds like an attempt to address this issue. [1] http://trac.osm.org/changeset/17070 -- Minh Nguyen m...@zoomtown.com

Re: [Talk-ca] Canadian OSM POI quality

On 2014-06-08 21:57, Paul Norman wrote: Inconsistent tagging was observed with some shops, such as variability between amenity=restaurant and amenity=fast_food. This should reflect differences between locations but may not. Inconsistent names were also observed, such as Walmart, Wal-mart, and

Re: [Talk-us] U.S. Bike Route 76

Ngày 3/11/09 8:48 PM, Paul Johnson vie^'t: Spencer Riddile wrote: Chris, What would the advantage/disadvantage be of using a different network name (usbrs vs. ncn) for U.S. bike routes. The author of open cycle map would have to adjust their symbolization if we started using usbrs. Is it

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On 4/11/09 11:38 PM, Nicholas Vetrovec wrote: Posted on the US Page to help coordinate US Interstate relations. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highways_Relations We'll need this kind of coordination for U.S. routes as well. -- Minh Nguyenm...@zoomtown.com AIM: trycom2000;

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On 4/12/09 11:23 AM, Joseph Jon Booker wrote: On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:39:45 -0700 Apollinaris Schoellascho...@gmail.com wrote: 2 relations are easier. adding role to thousands of members is a pain. and we need to split relations with API 0.6 anyway So how do we handle the case

[Talk-us] Duplicate TIGER imports

A few weeks after DaveHansen imported the TIGER data for Ohio [1], RSatterf reimported the data for Greene County, Ohio [2]. As a result, every single way in the county is duplicated. On top of that, RSatterf's import also added a loose node (not connected to any way) for every node of every

Re: [Talk-us] Duplicate TIGER imports

On 4/14/09 5:25 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 19:22 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Minh Nguyenm...@1ec5.org wrote: A few weeks after DaveHansen imported the TIGER data for Ohio [1], RSatterf reimported the data for Greene County, Ohio

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping HOAs

://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Swimming_pool). leisure=swimming_pool is supported by Osmarender. That renderer also adds a nice icon if you add sport=swimming. -- Minh Nguyen m...@zoomtown.com [[en:User:Mxn]] [[vi:User:Mxn]] [[m:User:Mxn]] AIM: trycom2000; Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog

Re: [Talk-us] Can-Amera border, states and provinces.

with fewer twists and turns will show up lighter when zoomed out. That is, Mapnik doesn't perform any smoothing on country boundaries yet. Also, changeset 17070 [1] sounds like an attempt to address this issue. [1] http://trac.osm.org/changeset/17070 -- Minh Nguyen m...@zoomtown.com

Re: [Talk-us] I am that MSP/St. Cloud, MN person

the padlock icon), and delete the original way (select the way and press Shift+Backsp). You'll also have to disconnect overpasses etc. as Apollinaris mentioned. -- Minh Nguyen m...@zoomtown.com [[en:User:Mxn]] [[vi:User:Mxn]] [[m:User:Mxn]] AIM: trycom2000; Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes

Re: [Talk-us] CDPs and admin_level

. There's an exception to every rule. :) -- Minh Nguyen m...@zoomtown.com [[en:User:Mxn]] [[vi:User:Mxn]] [[m:User:Mxn]] AIM: trycom2000; Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Talk-us] City boundaries on the Canada/US border

-Canada, US-Mexico, US-Pacific, US-Atlantic borders tied together with one super relation? Do any of the tools support these? Potlatch 2 does, so I'm sure the desktop editors do too. -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org AIM: trycom2000; Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

INDIANA and ILLINOIS with slightly larger I N and I L for readability? [2] [1] http://elrond.aperiodic.net/mtiles/cutouts/15/8690/12512.png [2] http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=15lat=38.68386lon=-87.53913layers=B0 -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org AIM: trycom2000; Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

Ngày 2012-04-03 5:17 AM, Phil! Gold viết: * Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-03 02:19 -0700]: Displaying concurrent shields in bunches is certainly an improvement over all the maps that just pick one shield to display, and they look like reassurance sign assemblies to boot. But it's still

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

#List_by_designation [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/409222 [4] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1661720 -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org AIM: trycom2000; Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

Ngày 2012-04-05 5:46 AM, Phil! Gold viết: * Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com [2012-04-05 08:14 -0400]: * Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-04 11:54 -0700]: Looks like the Indiana Toll Road has no relation yet. That's fine. We don't have a shield for it yet either. :) Ah. And that's because

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

Ngày 2012-04-05 5:14 AM, Phil! Gold viết: * Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-04 11:54 -0700]: More requests: in addition to its circular-shield state highway system, Kentucky also has an ad-hoc parkway network. [1] At least some of them are tagged `network=US:KY:Parkway` with a shield URL

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

Ngày 2012-04-11 4:23 PM, Phil! Gold viết: * Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-04 11:54 -0700]: More requests: in addition to its circular-shield state highway system, Kentucky also has an ad-hoc parkway network. At least some of them are tagged `network=US:KY:Parkway` with a shield URL

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

There's an ALT I-75 that needs its own sequence file: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2118037 It'd look like this: http://roadfan.com/altn75c.JPG -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org AIM: trycom2000; Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org

Re: [Talk-us] Fixing TIGER street name abbreviations

%26_Suffix_Indication -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Consensus on SR for state route versus state abbreviation?

of a conspiracy than a one-man crusade. :) -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations

with the township name in `modifier`? [1] http://www.angelfire.com/oh5/countysigns/ [2] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ohio_county_route_shield_templates -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org

Re: [Talk-us] 'creative' mapping

://www.vandemarkfarm.com/fun/lost-land-corn-maze.html [4] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2554858 -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Talk-us] First vs 1st

. -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] First vs 1st

] Elegant? I meant illegible. [2] And I wouldn't bother for `addr:housenumber`. That really was a straw man. ;-) -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Talk-us] An admin_level for CDPs?

county lines doesn't necessarily mean they should sit above counties. Some states allow cities and villages to cross county lines, but they're still admin_level=8. SteveA California [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio#CDPs [2] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=census -- Minh

Re: [Talk-us] An admin_level for CDPs?

On 2013-01-01 2:18 PM, stevea wrote: On 12/31/12 5:12 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: I'd argue that not all governmental boundaries need to be tagged as boundary=administrative. In Ohio, we've started to retag CDP boundaries with boundary=census and place=locality but without admin_level. [1][2

Re: [Talk-us] An admin_level for CDPs?

. -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Anyone ever talked about adding more Land Ownership data to OSM?

. -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Anyone ever talked about adding more Land Ownership data to OSM?

Ngày 2013-01-09 5:30 AM, Kevin Kenny viết: On 01/09/2013 03:24 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote: While filling in townships in the Greater Cincinnati area, I've also been working on TIGER's rather artful interpretation of the area's municipal boundaries, motivated by the Mapnik style's prominent

Re: [Talk-us] US Shields Development Server

/openstreetmap-carto -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

the `ref` tag as human-readable, not necessarily machine-parsable. That's what route relations are for. Imagine if we still insisted on machine-readable `is_in` tags! [1] http://osm.org/browse/way/4843509 -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

in '08). But that was before I understood the state's road networks, and my edits there have long since been reverted. Now my penance is holding out against California-style refs in my home state. :-\ -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org

Re: [Talk-us] US Bicycle Routes in KY, TN, AL, MS, and GA

frequently. [1] http://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/ -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] OpenCycleMap and bannered routes

`, `modifier=Scenic`, and of course `state=proposed`. [1] But OpenCycleMap sticks misleading 50 badges all along the route. I'm loathe to set the `ref` tag to 50 Scenic, as mappers once did on bannered road routes. So what's this armchair mapper to do? [1] http://osm.org/browse/relation/2532436 -- Minh

Re: [Talk-us] US Bicycle Routes in KY, TN, AL, MS, and GA

` with `ref=UGRR`, reflecting the fact that Nathan actually mapped the Underground Railroad Route. He did this in Southwest Ohio already. -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Removing US Bicycle Route tags

. The same can't be said of those resolutions. :-) [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16442009 [2] http://www.adventurecycling.org/resources/blog/a-trip-to-the-midwest-update-on-indiana-and-ohio/ [3] http://ci.london.oh.us/files/Resolution%20138-12.pdf -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5

Re: [Talk-us] Neighborhoods / Zillow

be better for geocoding. -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5.org; Blog: http://notes.1ec5.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

that I gave up updating our status page. [1] The county route relations haven’t seen much progress lately, due to a lack of motivation from the shield renderer project. ;-) [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio/Route_relations/State_routes -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org

Re: [Talk-us] TorhamZed imports

=retail, but that may still be suboptimal. Do we have better tags for truck stops, as opposed to toll road service areas? (I'd prefer not to tag the entire premises as amenity=fuel, since I'd previously drawn in all the canopies as building=roof, amenity=fuel, hgv/motorcar=designated/no.) -- Minh

Re: [Talk-us] Shields are up!

On 2013-07-29 11:12 AM, Richard Welty wrote: can someone please explain to me where to find documentation on the trick that's being used to generate customized SVG files for each of the counties based on the pentagonal shields? There's no trick, unfortunately. I'm just embedding images that I

Re: [Talk-us] route relations and non-rendering of shields

On 2013-08-04 1:21 PM, Richard Welty wrote: there are some NYS routes where we want to build relations, but we don't actually want any sort of ref tag or shield rendering, at least not by default. these are the NYS reference routes, generally numbered 9xx followed by a letter. four of these

Re: [Talk-us] Complex intersection mapping

On 2013-10-14 10:42 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: So what are we talking about? Intersections like this one, where one or more dual carriageways come together at an at-grade intersection: https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/6438c196-bb92-4f66-81dc-9b75186286ba/0e8f07ff527c6a85c0dec426b9b79f1e

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State highways.

] suggests that symbol= is used elsewhere (and for non-motor routes) to provide human-readable descriptions of symbols, while osmc:symbol= is for parseable values and wiki:symbol= is for Commons file names. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:symbol -- Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org Jabber: m...@1ec5

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State highways.

On 01:11 2013-11-27, Peter Davies wrote: Martijn, I think it would be conceptually clearest for all the 2-way single carriageway ways to point the same way and would suggest that this should normally in be the direction of increasing milepoints/pointes kilometriques (usually northwards or

Re: [Talk-us] Relation editor support for north/south and east/west similar to forward/backward

On 23:12 2013-11-26, Florian Lohoff wrote: On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 03:46:47PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote: So the relation between the east--west and north--south member roles is equivalent to the relation between forward--backward. Because the cardinal direction is commonly included on the

Re: [Talk-us] Marion and Lane County, Oregon county roads

On 23:48 2013-12-01, Paul Johnson wrote: Looking at Marion and Lane Counties in Oregon, I'm wondering what the source material is for much of the references, since I'm not familiar with any county road numbers in either of those counties (or for that matter, anywhere else in Oregon, and would

Re: [Talk-us] Oklahoma relations spreadsheet

On 11:31 2014-01-12, Peter Davies wrote: This is really helpful in confirming to me that I can't use relations in my apps, as there are too many unfinished ones. Can anyone tell me if they know of anyone else with such a spreadsheet for any other states? Actually, road route relations are

Re: [Talk-us] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Using 'Kort' outside of Switzerland

On 09:20 2014-01-19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2014/1/18 Peter Davies peter.dav...@crc-corp.com mailto:peter.dav...@crc-corp.com Would it depend on (say) whether or not the street is actually posted in Japanese as well as in English? Or should another criterion be suggested?

Re: [Talk-us] Any foursquare/OSM editing update? How about Craigslist?

On 16:07 2014-01-19, Randy Meech wrote: Why not? Because if you make a venn diagram of users who want to use a local/mapping product and users who want to edit one *actively*, there's honestly not much overlap. Products need to do right by their users. We offered the ability to edit the map on

Re: [Talk-us] State ref tags on ways: Use of unique ISO/ANSI/USPS 2-letter state codes in RELATIONS as well as WAYS?

On 16:04 2014-03-11, Peter Davies wrote: I thought I would make my proposal stand out a bit more by adding words to the title. :-O There are some weird things, like Nebraska's state law that requires NDOR to have a state road link to every community of a 100 people or more. I've changed some

Re: [Talk-us] State ref tags on ways: Use of unique ISO/ANSI/USPS 2-letter state codes in RELATIONS as well as WAYS?

On 07:21 2014-03-13, David ``Smith'' wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Minh Nguyen That said, I don't find a particularly strong case for leaving bare numbers in ways' ref tags. How about when the actual route marker is generic? A few states here and there use the plain circle

Re: [Talk-us] Geopolitical divisions in Ohio

Hi David, On 21:54 2014-03-15, David Days wrote: Minh, I appreciate your response--a little more detail on my end might help answer some of your questions and clarify my goals. I live near Portsmouth, OH (heh...in those hilly areas of which you speak), and I'm working on an electoral

Re: [Talk-us] Geopolitical divisions in Ohio

Somehow I posted this to talk-us instead of imports-us. Sorry about that. -- m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Geopolitical divisions in Ohio

Somehow I sent this to talk-us instead of imports-us. Sorry about that. -- m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] State ref tags on ways

On 23:53 2014-03-27, Elliott Plack wrote: Interesting note about this in Maryland. My friend Mike showed me that some mappers have been using the *county* route numbers on some county roads in Maryland. All county roads in MD have a 4 digit number that starts with CO, like CO1150. CO is also the

Re: [Talk-us] USBRS WikiProject seeks volunteer mappers

On 2014-05-31 14:06, Serge Wroclawski wrote: Since there is no signage for these routes, this is an import and should be following the import guidelines. In the past, on-road bike routes were typically advertised via maps and annual guidebooks rather than reassurance markers. The U.S. Bike

Re: [Talk-us] USBRS WikiProject seeks volunteer mappers

On 2014-06-01 10:46, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Generally in the UK we only map proposed NCN routes when a) we have some personal knowledge of them, and b) the route has a serious likelihood of being signposted in the next couple of years This is pretty much the standard for mapping

  1   2   3   >