So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9
I have a jsp page that imports com.polliard.db.RaidDB;
It also has a line that invokes a new instance of this class
RaidDB rdb = new RaidDB();
The code works on Jetty but when used with Tomcat I am getting the error
RaidDB cannot be resolved or is not a type.
Any
Unless I misunderstood, RaidDB.class should be located in directory
WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db and not
WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db/RaidDB.
Thomas Polliard wrote:
So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9
I have a jsp page that imports com.polliard.db.RaidDB;
It also has a line that invokes a
, June 03, 2005 2:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Confusion Land
Unless I misunderstood, RaidDB.class should be located in directory
WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db and not
WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db/RaidDB.
Thomas Polliard wrote:
So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9
I have a jsp page
./images
./images/space.gif
./raid.css
./header.jsp
--
Thomas Polliard
Sr. Systems Administrator, AOL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Polliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 2:55 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Confusion Land
It is located
Thomas Polliard wrote:
So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9
I have a jsp page that imports com.polliard.db.RaidDB;
It also has a line that invokes a new instance of this class
RaidDB rdb = new RaidDB();
The code works on Jetty but when used with Tomcat I am getting the error
RaidDB cannot be resolved
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Confusion Land
Unless I misunderstood, RaidDB.class should be located in directory
WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db and not
WEB-INF/classes/com/polliard/db/RaidDB.
Thomas Polliard wrote:
So I am running Tomcat 5.5.9
I have a jsp page that imports
yanjing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 5:18 AM
Subject: confusion to DBCP
I'm using mysql + tomcat as server to run jsp pages.
and there are JavaBeans too.
I have read a lot on the web that using a connection pool is very good.
I just wondering why
I'm using mysql + tomcat as server to run jsp pages.
and there are JavaBeans too.
I have read a lot on the web that using a connection pool is very good.
I just wondering why I should configure DBCP in tomcat?
i think if i write the database connection in jsp pages(not in beans)
I need configure
I would like to limit access to a directory path that I have in tomcat by
domain. I believe I can use the mod_access module with the allow directive
to do this. I found information about the directive at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_access.html#allow but I am still
slightly confused.
Hi,
Please follow the directions by user rmorriso on the following link.
It should work fine.
http://forums.devshed.com/archive/t-120081
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:11:15 + (GMT), Krishnakant Mane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello all,
im going to put a web application in java servlets
with
hello,
I have been going through the connection pooling docs
in the tomcat 5 documentation. and fortunately I
found out the sample for mysql jdbc.
now there is a confusion.
I want to know what is the difference between max
active and max idle connections.
I mean what is the concept behind
hello all,
im going to put a web application in java servlets
with tomcat 5 on a production ready server for real
time use.
I am thinking of using connection pooling but I am a
bit confused. I have initialised all my connections
in the servlet's init method and closed them in
distroy method.
so
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: connection pooling confusion help needed
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:11:15 + (GMT)
hello all,
im going to put a web application in java servlets
with tomcat 5 on a production ready server for real
time use.
I am thinking of using connection pooling but I am
I have been using Tomcat for quite some time now, and am still a bit shakey
on some of the configuration details. I am currently using Tomcat5 and I
want to my servlet to process all .jar and .jnlp files.
I have my servlet mapping set up in the web.xml:
servlet-mapping
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:35:34AM -0500, Mark Claassen wrote:
: I am currently using Tomcat5 and I
: want to my servlet to process all .jar and .jnlp files.
: [snip]
: My problem is that I want this to process all files, not just those in
: MySerlvet/
: [snip]
: How can I bundle this up as a
1) The T5.0 changelog claims:
Replace MX4J 1.1.1 with the Sun JMX 1.2 RI (remm)
2) The JDK 1.4.2 compat zip contains a jmx.jar; that
apparently contains mx4j - what version?
3) So is it mx4j or SUN JMX 1.2 RI or both? Why this
mess?
/sk
__
Do
I'm attempting to set a cookie in a servlet within my webapp and am running
into a problem
Inside the servlet, I create a cookie and add it to response. I then set
context and write HTML to the user. The html does a forward to another page
where I read all cookies.
As far as I can tell,
Apologies for asking the original question.
It appears the code works as expected - AFTER I restarted the server :(
On Monday 28 June 2004 01:32 pm, Robert Bateman wrote:
I'm attempting to set a cookie in a servlet within my webapp and am running
into a problem
Inside the servlet, I
Shapira, Yoav writes:
I think your testing, servlets, configuration is all fine. The
maxProcessors-1 observation is something I've noticed in the past, but
as you say I don't think many people care because they deal with ~75
maxProcessors (the default value).
Thanks - glad to know I'm not off
The second observation: two requests to the same servlet always
handled serially. Tomcat normally creates one instance of a servlet
for every declaration in web.xml. The exception is SingleThreadModel
(deprecated, don't use this) servlets. There's no provision in tomcat
to create more
V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors
/
Confusion
The second observation: two requests to the same servlet always
handled serially. Tomcat normally creates one instance of a servlet
for every declaration in web.xml. The exception is SingleThreadModel
(deprecated, don't use
Hi,
This suggested to me that with minProcessors=1 and
maxProcessors=2, the server would allow 2 concurrent connections.
Yup.
Seems maximum_concurrent_connections=(maxProcessors - minProcessors),
a slightly different relationship than I gathered from the docs.
I was hoping someone could
Yoav,
Thanks for the quick reply...
Create a servlet that takes a long time to process, so you can easily
observe the connections. Then make sure you make two concurrent
requests to that servlet, and that the servlet's HTML output doesn't
contain images, CSS references, or any other entities
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TC V4.1.29 Coyote Connector / minProcessors maxProcessors
/
Confusion
Yoav,
Thanks for the quick reply...
Create a servlet that takes a long time to process, so
I'm a little confused regarding TC V4.1.29 Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector
attributes minProcessors and maxProcessors. Server config docs state
minProcessors == number of connection threads to start initially
and maxProcessors == the maximum number of connection threads that
the server will create.
Hi all,
I am trying to create a security realm. I am confused as to where to
put the Realm directive. If I want to create a realm for a Context,
would I place the directive before or inside of the Context directive?
Thanks in advance.
--
_
Atreya Basu
Inside.
-Tim
Atreya Basu wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to create a security realm. I am confused as to where to
put the Realm directive. If I want to create a realm for a Context,
would I place the directive before or inside of the Context directive?
Thanks in advance.
, for example (not free, but
$35.00 isn't bad).
Also, see http://www.whichssl.org for more good info on the subject.
-dave
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Hi
, September 07, 2003 3:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Hi Dave,
how much does it cost at Verisign, and how long is it valid for? And is
this 'openssl' you mentioned a free alternative?
Adam
On 09/06/2003 03:21 PM Dave Wood wrote:
FINALLY!
I still don't
the way.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:40 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Well, after all this, I just discovered that VeriSign will basically let you
start over if it's within 30 days
, September 07, 2003 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Hi Dave,
how much does it cost at Verisign, and how long is it valid for? And is
this 'openssl' you mentioned a free alternative?
Adam
On 09/06/2003 03:21 PM Dave Wood wrote:
FINALLY!
I still don't know what I did wrong
Confusion
Well, after all this, I just discovered that VeriSign will basically let you
start over if it's within 30 days (which it is). So, for now, I'm going
down this path. Just talked to someone at V/S who said it would take just a
couple hours.
Oh, and I made a BACKUP of my new keystore file
, September 04, 2003 11:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Firstly, it looks like you should wipe you keystore and start again. To
use
a VS cert with Tomcat, the two options I know are:
1) Follow the instructions at http://www.comu.de/docs/tomcat_ssl.htm.
2
Barker
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Dave Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Bill. I think this highlights something I'm really not
understanding...
Didn't I generate an important private key
Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:04 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Thanks Bill. I think this highlights something I'm really not
understanding...
Didn't I generate an important private key somewhere along the line that I
can't just
keys as things that you can work with directly.
Thanks again,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jay Garala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 7:12 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Try the Java keytool help:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2
NOTE: You cannot export private key from keystore.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Thanks. With the exception of the openssl doc, I've been over these quite
/Verisign Confusion
NOTE: You cannot export private key from keystore.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Thanks. With the exception of the openssl doc, I've been
Hmm.. Did you create the PK in Tomcat's keystore or your JDK's keystore?
Try the keyclone? Clone your 'company' to 'tomcat'.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:07 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:21 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Hmm.. Did you create the PK in Tomcat's keystore or your JDK's keystore?
Try the keyclone? Clone your 'company' to 'tomcat'.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL
Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:12 PM
To: Tomcat Email List
Subject: SSL/Verisign Confusion
I'm having a problem getting an SSL certificate from Verisign working
correctly. I'm going to include everything I can think of that MIGHT be a
problem. Unfortunately
Message-
From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:07 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
I realize you can't do this with keytool. Is there no way to do it at
all?
I'm beginning to think I might be totally hosed here.
Thanks,
Dave
So it's possible then...? That's promising.
Thanks (in advance) very much.
-dave
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
I'm working on a tool to pull out
Confusion
I realize you can't do this with keytool. Is there no way to do it at
all?
I'm beginning to think I might be totally hosed here.
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jay Garala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:37 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE
-
From: Jay Garala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: SSL/Verisign Confusion
NOTE: You cannot export private key from keystore.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
in that messed up state.
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Have you thought of manipulating the keystore programmatically? Here's what
I'm having a problem getting an SSL certificate from Verisign working
correctly. I'm going to include everything I can think of that MIGHT be a
problem. Unfortunately, there are a couple things I can't quite remember
for certain. Here's the situation:
1. I generated the initial key using an
Firstly, it looks like you should wipe you keystore and start again. To use
a VS cert with Tomcat, the two options I know are:
1) Follow the instructions at http://www.comu.de/docs/tomcat_ssl.htm.
2) Using openssl or otherwise, convert your cert+key to a pkcs12 file, and
use that as your keystore
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSL/Verisign Confusion
Firstly, it looks like you should wipe you keystore and start again. To use
a VS cert with Tomcat, the two options I know are:
1) Follow the instructions at http://www.comu.de/docs/tomcat_ssl.htm.
2
Hello List... newbie question coming up:
Phaser charged...
Shields at 80%...
Photon torpedos loaded...
If I set up a jdbc connection object in one servlet, do I have to close it each time
or can the same connection be re-utilized by other servlets each using a different
sql statement
I agree with Nix, use a connection pool.
One connection per user may be ok when you've got, say, 5 concurrent
users but when you've got 1000, 1, Not scalable.
http://tomcatfaq.sourceforge.net/database.html
Hello List... newbie question coming up:
If I set up a jdbc connection object in one servlet, do I have to close it each time
or can the same connection be re-utilized by other servlets each using a different sql
statement (perhaps storing the connection as a session attribute?).
Is there a
The preferred way of doing this is to use connection pooling. The
primary reasons are scalability, speed and simplicity. If you have 5,000
people using your app at the same time, by your method you will have to
have 5,000 connections to the database (one per user) stored in the
various
Hello,
I'm attempting to set up a DataSourceRealm within a virtual host. What
I would like to do is have every virtual host have it's own DataSource
and have a private realm within the virtual host. In this way each
virtual host owner can manage their own users in a set of DB tables that
I have an expanded-war app where it will initially auto-deploy (ie. expand
the directories under /webapps), but not able to get it to hot redeploy
after changes are made. By 'hot', I mean automatically have a new.war file
re-expanded without restarting Tomcat.
If I make changes to the app and
Mark writes:
I have an expanded-war app where it will initially auto-deploy (ie. expand
the directories under /webapps), but not able to get it to hot redeploy
after changes are made. By 'hot', I mean automatically have a new.war file
re-expanded without restarting Tomcat.
If I make changes
At 12/3/2002 09:09 AM, you wrote:
Mark writes:
I have an expanded-war app where it will initially auto-deploy (ie.
expand the directories under /webapps), but not able to get it to hot
redeploy after changes are made. By 'hot', I mean automatically have a
new.war file re-expanded without
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Mark wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:07:29 -0500
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TC 4.1.12 auto re-deploy problem/confusion
I have an expanded-war app where it will initially auto-deploy (ie
Hi,
I am getting a little confused about the topic weather Tomcat 4.x ist having a
Connection Pooling implementet or not.
I was following the discussions the last few days and the answers have been a little
contradicting.
Therfore my question loud and clear ; )
Is there a Connection Pooling
Hi Rainer.
I am having the same confusion as you. Based on testing the time required to get each
connection, it appears as though the standard JNDI DataSource lookups do not return
any sort of a pooled connection - it took virtually identical times to get a
connection from the JNDI DataSource
Message-
From: Clearwater, Pete [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:25 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Confusion about ConnectionPooling with Tomcat 4.
Hi Rainer.
I am having the same confusion as you. Based on testing the time required to get each
connection
I've read the bug reports
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5647 )and scoured the
mesage boards and I am still confused as to whether there is a confirmed
version of Tomcat 4.0.x that will works correctly with isapi_redirect.dll
on IIS to create fully populated Ajp13Principal
Hi,
I am getting wierd results running Tomcat 4.1 XML. I want different
applications to have separate XML files, so have attempted to follow the
instructions
'If you wish to *not* make any XML parser visible to all web applications,
this can be accomplished by copying the xerces.jar file
Hi,
I have tomcat 4.0.1 running on a Redhat 7.1 system. I can get the examples
servlets working, the ones that come with tomcat.
I installed some simple servlets in webapps/ROOT and they work. I put one
in
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/classes/hello/HelloServlet2.class
and invoked it
Hi...
Hi,
I have tomcat 4.0.1 running on a Redhat 7.1 system. I can get the
examples
servlets working, the ones that come with tomcat.
I installed some simple servlets in webapps/ROOT and they work. I put one
in
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/classes/hello/HelloServlet2.class
Hi...
I believe that you need to modify the server.xml to add the context. As it
currently stands, Tomcat has no way of knowing that the directory hello
actually exists.
The statement to add (at the minimum) would be something like:
Context path= docBase=hello debug=0/.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List; David Bazell
Subject: Re: Servlet and Web.xml confusion
Hi...
Hi,
I have tomcat 4.0.1 running on a Redhat 7.1 system. I can get the
examples
servlets working, the ones that come with tomcat.
I
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Purcell, Scott wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:34:18 -0600
From: Purcell, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: web.xml file confusion
Hello,
I am working out of Martys book
List
Subject: Re: web.xml file confusion
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Purcell, Scott wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:34:18 -0600
From: Purcell, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: web.xml file confusion
Hello
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Purcell, Scott wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:19:09 -0600
From: Purcell, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: web.xml file confusion
Thanks Craig,
I think my issue
with org.apache.jsp.IOException.
This may be in turn related to some confusion between the public JspWriter
class and some underlying implementation class with the same unqualified
name.
As it happens, I don't need to use JspWriter, as it was only for debugging.
However, this sort of ambiguity could
(JspWriter, IOException), the import statements in the generated .java
files based on the .jsp files are too vague... java.io.IOException is
getting mixed up with org.apache.jsp.IOException.
This may be in turn related to some confusion between the public JspWriter
class and some underlying
--
because if both the internal Tomcat classes and other classes with the same
names are ALL imported explicitly, there's still as much potential for
confusion.
Using fully-qualified class names everywhere in application code slows down
development (more typing) and may reduce readability (ok, you
are ALL imported explicitly, there's still as much potential for
confusion.
the servlet code generated by jasper only imports the servlet and jsp
packages and the jasper packages perhaps even the jasper packages
shouldn't be imported, but hey...
I assume though that this fixed it?
cheesr
dim
But if I import explicitly java.io.IOException, it might cause
unqualified
references to the Tomcat IOException class to become mixed up too !
I dont think there is a tomcat IOException... the compiler was looking for
that class because it was compiling a servlet that referenced a class
Add instead
!-- Apache AJP13 support. Added IAW
http://jakarta.apache.com/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/mod_jk-howto.html
--
Connector className=org.apache.tomcat.service.PoolTcpConnector
Parameter name=handler
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: tomcat 3.2.3 confusion with mod_jk/ajpv13
I want to use the latest stable release of Tomcat with support for
SSL and Apache, so I've downloaded 3.2.3. Reading the docs, I find
hi friends,
can anybody help me ..i m in fix ..
1. some body said me that containts of work
directiory in tomcat are generated automatically and
normal functionaing of a site dosent get affected if
all class files in work directiory are deleted . is
this true ???
even if i delete all
The work directory is where .jsp files are compiled first to .java then to
.class files. You shouldn't need to worry about it at all. If you delete
files in there I think you could have problems while tomcat is running,
but if you stop tomcat you can certainly delete all the files and they
will
- Original Message -
From: vinod tomcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:19 PM
Subject: confusion
hi friends,
can anybody help me ..i m in fix ..
1. some body said me that containts of work
directiory in tomcat are generated
1. IF I UPDATE ANY JSP FILE AND UPLOAD , DO I NEED
TO MAKE ANY CHANGES WITH WORK DIRECT. SOME BODY TOLD
ME THAT I WILL HAVE TO DELETE THE CONCERNED .CLASS
FILES ???
2. IF I MAKE CHANGES WITH THE ANY CONFIGURATION
FILE ...DO I NEED TO MAKE ANY CHANGES WITH ANY OTHER
FILE ... I HAD
ok - hang on a second... no need for the caps... in case you weren't
aware, caps are interpreted as SHOUTING and is considered rude.
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-1] vinod tomcat wrote:
1. IF I UPDATE ANY JSP FILE AND UPLOAD , DO I NEED
TO MAKE ANY CHANGES WITH WORK DIRECT. SOME BODY
- Original Message -
From: vinod tomcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: confusion
1. IF I UPDATE ANY JSP FILE AND UPLOAD , DO I NEED
TO MAKE ANY CHANGES WITH WORK DIRECT. SOME BODY TOLD
ME THAT I WILL HAVE TO DELETE
Robert,
what are you trying to achieve here? There are two things about this
that strike me as odd:
1. in httpd.conf you have ServerName www.foobar.net, whilst in
server.xml you have host name=www.raptor.net - as I understand it
these should be the same name.
2. the DocumentRoot you have for
Robert Schmid wrote:
At 8/3/2001 08:53 AM +1000, you wrote:
Robert,
I have strange habits in site design I'd like to be able to swap an
index.html for index.xml. I've got a better understanding of things now,
but I'm not sure why there is an enforced segregation of files. Since most
of
I swear I've read the documentation! I have Virtual Hosts Contexts defined;
Server.xml
Host
name=www.raptor.net
Context path= docBase=/home/net/foobar/htdocs
debug=0/
/Host
Host
name=www.blackgryphongraphics.com
Context path= docBase=/home/com/barfoo/htdocs
Hi,
I'm just a bit confused. I currently have the following:
Solaris 2.7
Apache 1.3.14 (/usr/local/apache)
Tomcat 3.2 (/usr/local/tomcat3.2)
I built Apache with DSO enabled.
server.xml: (Is this correct?)
context path=""
docBase="/usr/local/apache/htdocs"
debug="0"
reloadable="true"
eally well
Filip
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Orchanian" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 11:03 AM
Subject: Apache/Tomcat confusion
Hi,
I'm just a bit confused. I currently have the following:
Solaris 2.7
Apache 1.3.14 (/usr/local/apac
I'm actually putting in the IP address of the server.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone
Hi,
Are you really entering something like
try this on unix:
at the prompt, type netstat -a |grep PORTNO
-Original Message-
From: John Bateman [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone
I'm actually putting
try this on unix box:
at the prompt, type out netstat -a | grep PORTNO
-Original Message-
From: John Bateman [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone
I can't do
I ask for
HEAD / HTTP/1.0
and this is returned
HTTP/1.0 500 Internal Server Error
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:17:26 GMT
Servlet-Engine: Tomcat Web Server/3.1 (JSP 1.1; Servlet 2.2; Java 1.2.2;
Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i386; java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Content-Language: en
Content-Type: text/html
the Tomcat servlet engine IS running?!?
-Original Message-
From: Jagannathan, Giri (c) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:18 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone
try this on unix:
at the prompt, type netstat -a |g
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:01:39AM -0400, John Bateman wrote:
I ask for
HEAD / HTTP/1.0
and this is returned
HTTP/1.0 500 Internal Server Error
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:17:26 GMT
Servlet-Engine: Tomcat Web Server/3.1 (JSP 1.1; Servlet 2.2; Java 1.2.2;
Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i386;
Hi
I'm a bit confused over all the documentation I've been reading. It tells me
to run the tomcat server in stand alone mode and verify that I can get the
servlets working before I try running it in or out of process with another
webserver.
This I understand, but I can't seem to find an example
jus try accessing http://serverip:8080 without the file index.html!! It
worked for me..
-Original Message-
From: John Bateman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 4:53 PM
To: Tomcat-User (E-mail)
Subject: confusion on running Stand alone
Hi
I'm a bit confused
You're getting DNS errors when you enter the "IP" number?
- Original Message -
From: Jagannathan, Giri (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 4:51 PM
Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone
jus try accessing http://serverip:80
"0" reloadable="true"
/Context
Very strange but then again it is the holloween season over here. :)
-Original Message-
From: Jagannathan, Giri (c) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 4:52 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: confusion on
try http://localhost:8080
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: confusion on running Stand alone
Hi,
Are you really entering something like
http://192.9.2.200:8080/index.html
99 matches
Mail list logo
