see much value.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:51 PM
Subject: [sca-java-integration-branch] Missing WSDL type imports causes
aymetrical behviour
Hi
I remember Dan
I think we need to reorg the itest directory for databinding a bit and I
need some help to get the maven bit correct as I'm a bit of a maven novice.
I'm looking at the integration branch at the moment as that is where the
tests are checked in but I don't see why these tests can't go in the trunk
Just took an update from svn, and removed my mvn repository, and am getting
failures in the sdo databinding tests starting with...
Running org.apache.tuscany.databinding.sdo.SDOExceptionHandlerTestCase
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.09 sec
FAI
LURE!
On 3/14/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just took an update from svn, and removed my mvn repository, and am
getting failures in the sdo databinding tests starting with...
Running org.apache.tuscany.databinding.sdo.SDOExceptionHandlerTestCase
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 3
I note that there are some checkstyle/pmd plugin configurations in the
testing/sca pom. Can anyone tell me if this is actually running. I've not
seen any indication in the mvn builds that I'm doing that it is. Maybe it's
just that the code is perfect or that I'm not configuring mvn properly!
On 3/14/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll probably not answer you question about differences, but what I
usually
just run mvn -Psourcecheck. But i have found very useful to use checkstyle
and pmd plugins inside IDE (my case eclipse).
On 3/14/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 3/14/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/03/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just given this a try with the windows binary builds and following
the
getting started instructions to run the calculator sample.
The first try failed as libxml2 and iconv are missing. I
On 3/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
I was using libxml2 2.6.27, seeing you had 2.6.24 i went looking for
that
but can't find a pre-compiled win32 version for that, so I tried
2.6.23 and
using that the sample runs fine.
...ant
Would it help to
On 3/15/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
I was using libxml2 2.6.27, seeing you had 2.6.24 i went looking for
that
but can't find a pre-compiled win32 version for that, so I tried
2.6.23 and
using
identifying violation right when you are coding.
On 3/14/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/14/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/14/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll probably not answer you question about differences, but what I
usually
just run mvn
On 3/15/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So that prompted me to check the licenses. Zlib and libxml2 look fine i
think though they do need to be added to the Tuscany LICENSE and NOTICE
files if the Tuscany code is using those APIs whether or not Tuscany
Native
is distributing them. Looks
in
transformer to interop and not creating interop/transformer.
I'll look at combining the transformer tests into interop
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 4:06 AM
On 3/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
In particular I will need to copy some schema and wsdl files from
one
module to another.
I notice that various build helper plugins are used in
various poms. Is there a recommended one for copying
On 3/15/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
I forgot to mention that the reason that so many XML files have
suddenly
appeared is that I've take the files that currently live in /
interop and
renamed and refactored them.
Thanks
On 3/16/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, apollogies for that. I have to admit that I'm a cvs person at
heart so
just getting to grips with svn. I ljust ooked up svn move and got
that why
didn't I look there first feeling, so I'll remember that for next
time.
Thanks for
On 3/20/07, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've downloaded the SDO src distribution on XP and it builds and runs as
advertised.
+1 from me.
Geoff.
On 20/03/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
...ant
On 3/16/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to
On 3/21/07, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/21/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/03/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/07, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've downloaded the SDO src
On 3/21/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's an example in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?view=markup
Hope that helps,
Kelvin.
On 21/03/07, muhwas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run hello world web service sample. I
am
On 3/21/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am glad you brought this point up.
You mentioned about constant confrontation between two sets of people. I
would say, unfortunately, this has been caused by a lack of diversity in
the community.
I hope most of these
On 3/22/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thanks for sharing this information - its really useful.
- Venkat
On 3/22/07, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We just finished the ServerSide demo and I figured I send a mail to
the list outlining how it went...
We
it to the list, if that helps.
Thanks
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:31 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: ServerSide Presentation and Demo
On 3/22/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thanks
On 3/22/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Now that the SPI is getting stable and we have the initial end-to-end
story for federation working, I would suggest we plan for the final
release for kernel 2.0, with emphasis on federation and user experience.
I was thinking about
On 3/22/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
My reply to Mario has all the detail to run the demo.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:00 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: ServerSide
On 3/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this issue will be raised again and again every time new members
come to try Tuscany trunk, and this is very bad for a project that is
trying
to build a community. Also, trying to quote an article Jim Marino sent
from
Martin Fowler
On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
+1.
I think it's in line with the proposal in my response to Meeraj.
One question: For a bundle to reference a module in the Tuscany
source tree, do we really have to copy (or use
On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
Ok, cool, so I can run a simple app in a single VM. Let me try it
out.
Just to set expectations, I don't think the system configuration in
the default runtime has been switched over
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:43 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Compilation status
On 3/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this issue will be raised again and again every time new
members
come
On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
stupidquestion
When you talk about flattening the module hierarchy do you mean this
literally in svn (which I like the sound of as I can never find
anything in
all the nested dirs - my
On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
Jeremy. This sounds like a simpler approach than what is there now.
I like
the idea but a question.
1) move everything that does not logical depend on
org.apache.tuscany:sca:1.0-incubating
On 3/26/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
Did you start ActiveMQ before you started the master?
Ta
Meeraj
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tag for TSSS demo code
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17
On 3/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/26/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
Did you start ActiveMQ before you started the master?
Ta
Meeraj
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Touché :)
On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, and here's a first test case of saying what I really think. I hope
nobody is going to slam me :-)
I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need
-Dtuscany.adminPort=2000 -jra start.server.jar master
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:41 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tag for TSSS demo code
On 3/26/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/26/07
On 3/26/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
By reading through a bunch of e-mails on this mailing list and adding my
imagination, I put together a conceptual diagram at the following wiki
page
to illustrate the kernel modulization.
...\tuscany\java\distribution\sca\demo\target\demo-2.0-alpha2-incubating
-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
5 - go to the bin directory of the uncompressed file and run java
-Dtuscany.adminPort=2000 -jra start.server.jar master
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
On 3/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for late replies Simon, I am offsite in India for the next two
weeks.
Regarding the SCDL, there was a post earlier in the list with the SCDL
(from
me). You can use
On 3/27/07, Antollini, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meeraj,
I finally got JXTA working! The problem was that the message being sent
was null...
In JxtaDiscoverService.java the code for sending the message was:
public int sendMessage(final String runtimeId, final XMLStreamReader
content)
On 3/28/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll go ahead to commit the last piece which integrates the databinding
framework with the latest core if there are no other concerns.
The new picture will be:
kernel/core: will depend on databinding-framework (the dependency would be
On 3/29/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand your clarification correctly, this vote is about putting
out
a single release with a certain number of modules in it, and with each
module having the same version number. In particular, this vote does
not set a
On 3/29/07, Brian Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm one of the Maven developers next-door at apache and the main
developer for the maven-dependency-plugin. We've had a few requests
recently from Tuscany users who have problems with the instructions or
with the pom. (I haven't found the
On 3/30/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Brian.
It's so nice of you to remind us. IIRC, the original problem was due to
the
newer versions of the maven-dependency-plugin as we referenced the
SNAPSHOT
version of the plugin in M2 driver. I think we have fixed the wrong
configuration
you're doing, you want unpack but just need
to put the config in the pom. Alternatively, you could add it to the
build and make it happen for the user automatically.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 12:03 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
On 3/29/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Raymond,
Once you have done this, I'd like to get started with syncing up the trunk
for complex and many valued properties since this depends on the
databinding
framework to trasform property definitions in SCDLs to JavaObejects.
-
Ok, so back in from Easter hols and I've debugged through the Calculator
sample with the newly organized trunk. You guys have been busy! I'd like to
get some more of the samples on line and hence learn more about how it
works. I was thinking of having a crack at composite-impl because this looks
On 4/11/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Ok, so back in from Easter hols and I've debugged through the Calculator
sample with the newly organized trunk. You guys have been busy! I'd
like to
get some more of the samples on line and hence learn more about
To debug the calculator sample I did a mvn -Peclipse eclipse:eclipse in
java/sca and imported the calculator sample project and all dependecy
projects, into eclipse. Is there a way of generating the workspace
automatically to avoid the import step? Looking at the eclipse plugin
documentation
On 4/11/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at how people is doing in Apache Abdera
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/java/trunk/BUILDING
I think you can use :
mvn -Declipse.workspace=/path/to/workspace eclipse:eclipse
On 4/11/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED
Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
3/ package names within the modules don't always match the module
name
which makes it trick to find classes sometimes. I don't have loads of
examples here but the problem I have was trying to find
o.a.t.api.SCARuntime
On 4/11/07, Salvucci, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I uploaded a document to
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/47512/TuscanyJAV
ASCA.pdf which contains some slides about Java SCA Runtime. They are
based on M2 but perhaps some graphics could serve to be reused
I'm trying to bring the composite-impl sample up. The sample uses nested
composite files and if fails trying to wire up the references from a top
level component (which is implemented in a separate composite - see [1]) to
another component.
The failure happens during the connect phase of
On 4/11/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to run the echo-binding testcases after updating the binding
implementation, but I'm getting the exception below.
Are we actually wiring services and references ?
java.lang.IllegalStateException: java.lang.NullPointerException
On 4/12/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If the calulator sample is working then I suppose the wiring is in place
isn't it ? Let me go and try this one.
- Venkat
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/11/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Regards,
+sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 4:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JAVA_SCA_M2 slides
On 4/11/07, Salvucci, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I uploaded a document to
http://cwiki.apache.org
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Composite configuration problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've not looked into this one specifically but it doesn't stop the test
passing. I do get more of these problem reports
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to bring the composite-impl sample up. The sample uses nested
composite files and if fails trying to wire up the references from a top
level component (which is implemented in a separate composite - see
.
Not sure it this would complicate things... it was just a thought... maybe
there are better options.
- Venkat
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Composite
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to bring the composite-impl sample up. The sample uses
nested
composite files and if fails trying to wire up
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to bring the composite-impl sample up. The sample uses
nested
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/12/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to bring
,
org.apache.tuscany.assembly.Component definition)
throws WiringException {
// Skip the composite
if(definition.getImplementation() instanceof Composite) {
return;
}
// End of skip
...
}
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
On 4/13/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With the current assembly model, how can we tell if a component reference
is
promoted by a comosite reference? I can get all the promoted references
from
CompositeReference but not the other way.
Thanks,
Raymond
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Simon.
For the composite component, it's probably not necessary to attach the
wire.
Can you try to add the following code in DeployerImpl.connect() to see
if it
helps?
public void
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Simon.
For the composite component, it's probably not necessary to attach the
wire.
Can you try to add the following code
for start doing it.
Keep in touch.
Regards,
+sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JAVA_SCA_M2 slides
On 4/12/07, Salvucci, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I'm
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Simon.
For the composite component, it's probably not necessary
On 4/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED
I just made the following change in ImportSDOProcessorTestCase to make the
SDO tests work. See commented out/new line below. The loader in this case
dereferences the rolver so you can't pass in null without getting an NPE.
I'm not sure what the intention is here so I haven't checked this in. We
On 4/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
3/ package names within the modules don't always match the module name
which makes it trick to find classes sometimes. I don't have loads of
examples here but the problem I have was trying to find
I'm having problems getting XSD includes to load in the databinding itest so
am interested to know if we are using a different version of
o.a.ws.common.XmlSchema than used to be the case. I'm getting an NPE in this
package because the baseUri in the XmlSchemaCollection is not set up
correctly.
On 4/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having problems getting XSD includes to load in the databinding itest
so am interested to know if we are using a different version of
o.a.ws.common.XmlSchema than used to be the case. I'm getting an NPE in
this package because the baseUri
On 4/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having problems getting XSD includes to load in the databinding
itest
so am interested to know if we are using a different version of
o.a.ws.common.XmlSchema
Static SDO used in the databinding tests with the Axis2 binding are not
being successfully identified as SDOs.
In SDODataBinding.introspect() one of the tests use to identify and SDO from
a Java type is as follows
HelperContext context = HelperProvider.getDefaultContext();
...
I've been caught out a couple of times now by the runtime silently failing
to work properly because I haven't put the correct set of extensions on my
classpath. Locally I have just put a printout in to warn me.
DefaultStAXArtifactProcessorExtensionPoint
public Object read(XMLStreamReader
Just doing a complete build from scratch (repo clean etc.) and I go the
following in the maven build
Running org.apache.tuscany.databinding.sdo2om.DataObject2OMElementTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.011 sec
FA
ILURE!
testTransform(
On 4/17/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Did you run with mvn clean install? It seems that you have some obsolete
classes in the target folder.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday
On 4/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get intermittent build failures when running the build in the testcases
which use the HTTP service, the error is pasted in below, is anyone else
seeing this?
Its really easy (in my environment) to recreate, change into
(HelperProvider.getDefaultContext()). Please let me know which test case I
can use to further investigate.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:04 PM
Subject: Use of HelperContext
On 4/13/07, Paulo Henrique Trecenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
How I can use the build of SCA?
The distribution script and same modules is not complete...
I can use the SNAPSHOT version for tests of my application...
--
Paulo Henrique Trecenti
Hi Paulo
Just going through cleaning my mail
On 4/13/07, muhwas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I was wondering if there is any way to get a reference
to web service interface using service name (in SCDL
file) only instead of doing
compositeContext.locateService(ClassName.class,composite)
thank you,
muhwas
through our whole runtime.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:04 AM
Subject: Notifcation of missing extensions
I've been caught out a couple of times now by the runtime
On 4/18/07, Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I don't have all the new code set up so let me just ask.
Is it possible with the code in trunk today to, over the default binding,
invoke a service that was deployed in a separate top-level-Composite?
That is, say, to deploy a component
On 4/18/07, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are done now:
1) Using SDO Java could move to 'user guide' on this page.
+1
2) Code structure can move to get involved or even to the architecture doc
+1 to moving to get involved
On 4/17/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
- I like the list of modules I think we should go with the module name
from the code and link to a separate
page for each one. (take a look I've made an example). We can then
use
On 4/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of extensions, bindings, services, samples which can then help
decide
On 4/19/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I created a prototype to play with aop-based logging and tracing. The
annotation-style aspect development seems to be simpler as it doesn't
require the aspectj compiler. You can see the code at:
On 4/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
- I like the list of modules I think we should go with the module
name
from
structure, hints on development, etc.
Haleh
On 4/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 4/20/07, Snehit Prabhu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there an updated version of this document (Extending Tuscany) that
reflects the current state of the trunk? Most of the classes in the models
shown are nonexistent today. Is the whole programming model depicted here
irrelevant?
thanks
On 4/20/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on focusing on the stability and consumability for the core functions,
other then helping on simplifying the runtime further and work on a Domain
concept, I also want to contribute around having a better integration with
App Servers,
On 4/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Luciano Resende wrote:
+1 on focusing on the stability and consumability for the core
functions,
other then helping on simplifying the runtime further and work on a
Domain
concept, I also want to contribute around having a
On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 23/04/07, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me
On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Welcome Andy
On 4/23/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
...ant
On 4/23/07,
Hi
At relatively short notice I've sorted out a trip to ApacheCon Europe in
Amsterdam next week. I expect to be there Tuesday evening through Friday and
would love to put faces to the names of any of the Tuscany crowd. So if you
fancy meeting up for a beer/juice/coffee etc. drop me a line and
Following on from the release content thread [1] I'd like to kick off a
discussion on how we resurrect support for a distributed runtime. We had
this feature before the core modularization and I think it would be good to
bring it back again. For me this is about working out how the tuscany
On 4/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that the java/sca/contrib directory has potential to confuse
people, as many modules under contrib have obsolete pom.xml files, are
not actively maintained and are not building.
I was thinking about renaming the pom.xml files
On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
The databinding itests seem to hang, blocking the build. Is anybody
else running into this?
I have moved these itests temporarily out of the build until this is
resolved.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant,
your note is well timed as I've had a couple of off-line chats with
people
in the last week about release naming, particularly with regard to the
effect that a milestone or alpha name can have on uptake of a release. In
the IRC chat of
Following Sebastiens post about the databinding test locking up (he went
ahead and removed it from the itest pom to get the build to work) I tried
the test and, once I had changed the poms to depend on http-jetty as they
used to, I got the same effect of the test hanging. The process is sitting
On 4/24/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing lots of Tomcat-related test failures when trying to build
the latest trunk code. I've done a new checkout and cleaned out my
maven repo. Here's a sample:
Running org.apache.tuscany.binding.axis2.itests.HelloWorldTestCase
log4j:WARN
On 4/24/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/24/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing lots of Tomcat-related test failures when trying to build
the latest trunk code. I've done a new checkout and cleaned out my
maven repo. Here's a sample
On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
I did try running the databinding itest with tomcat and it wasn't very
happy
Simon, what exceptions are you getting when running the databinding
itest with tomcat? do you have a log?
Thanks.
--
Jean
201 - 300 of 1885 matches
Mail list logo
