Den 2010-09-06 07:16:26 skrev John Kaufmann kaufm...@nb.net:
In a message dated 2010.09.05 02:29 -0500, Jeffrey Needle wrote:
JBF, when I saw Jeffrey's question I recalled having the same problem,
fixed by turning off one of Writer's many automagical features which
are
on by default - but
JBF, when I saw Jeffrey's question I recalled having the same problem,
fixed by turning off one of Writer's many automagical features which are
on by default - but I could not remember where. Now, after seeing your
reply to Jeffrey, I find this even more curious:
In a message dated
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 02:13 -0400, John Kaufmann wrote:
JBF, when I saw Jeffrey's question I recalled having the same problem,
fixed by turning off one of Writer's many automagical features which are
on by default - but I could not remember where. Now, after seeing your
reply to Jeffrey, I
Le 05/09/2010 08:13, John Kaufmann a écrit :
JBF, when I saw Jeffrey's question I recalled having the same problem,
fixed by turning off one of Writer's many automagical features which
are on by default - but I could not remember where. Now, after seeing
your reply to Jeffrey, I find this
In a message dated 2010.09.05 02:29 -0500, Jeffrey Needle wrote:
JBF, when I saw Jeffrey's question I recalled having the same problem,
fixed by turning off one of Writer's many automagical features which are
on by default - but I could not remember where. ...
Menu Tools Autocorrect
J-B,
In a message dated 2010.09.05 02:36 -0500, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Under: Tools Autocorrect Options Options tab ... I still
don't see which option turns that behavior on/off ... Can you fill
in the blank, please?
It is the checkbox Apply numbering - symbols ...
I wish it were
Le 04/09/2010 06:52, Jeffrey Needle a écrit :
Using OO 3.x on both Windows and Linux platforms.
When I type a paragraph and begin it with something like:
1. The first paragraph.
2. The second paragraph.
OO automatically reformats the paragraph with a hanging indent. I
want it to
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Le 04/09/2010 06:52, Jeffrey Needle a écrit :
Using OO 3.x on both Windows and Linux platforms.
When I type a paragraph and begin it with something like:
1. The first paragraph.
2. The second paragraph.
OO automatically reformats the paragraph with a hanging
Using OO 3.x on both Windows and Linux platforms.
When I type a paragraph and begin it with something like:
1. The first paragraph.
2. The second paragraph.
OO automatically reformats the paragraph with a hanging indent. I want
it to just accept my input as typed. How do I turn this off?
On 07/27/2010 08:36 PM, RA Brown wrote:
David Middlekauff wrote:
Dear Users:
I need help in converting Hotmail messages to a CSV (comma separated
value)
flat file for database importing. Can this be done using any Open
Office
software? I believe it can be done by importing into Outlook and
David Middlekauff wrote:
Dear Users:
I need help in converting Hotmail messages to a CSV (comma separated value)
flat file for database importing. Can this be done using any Open Office
software? I believe it can be done by importing into Outlook and then to a
CSV file, but I am looking for
Dear Users:
I need help in converting Hotmail messages to a CSV (comma separated value)
flat file for database importing. Can this be done using any Open Office
software? I believe it can be done by importing into Outlook and then to a
CSV file, but I am looking for other solutions.
--
David Middlekauff wrote:
Dear Users:
I need help in converting Hotmail messages to a CSV (comma separated value)
flat file for database importing. Can this be done using any Open Office
software? I believe it can be done by importing into Outlook and then to a
CSV file, but I am looking for
Greetings,
I have created a document with openoffice.org writer it is an applications
with fields to enter info from applicant. I have been trying an trying to
figure out how to save this so no one can change the application but the
applicants can enter their info an return it to me. I
On 06/17/2010 12:27 PM, Jay Ramona Cramer wrote:
Greetings,
I have created a document with openoffice.org writer it is an applications
with fields to enter info from applicant. I have been trying an trying to
figure out how to save this so no one can change the application but the
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:17:19 -0500, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
On 03/15/10 14:05, Richard Travers wrote:
In article
c4797ebf1003150850n13d84bb2jb91cf5cba2767...@mail.gmail.com,
jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
This is used for:
* TeX/BibTex files;
On 03/16/10 05:13, netsecur...@sound-by-design.com wrote:
snip
In actuality the first couple of lines of a file often identify the source
program when you look at them with a hex editor. This should be common
I never said there wasn't some other method to identify the file, I was
just saying
That larger base is a direct result of the ongoing criminal activity
that microsoft has engaged in for the last twenty odd years. This
ongoing criminal enterprise is enhanced by the fact that every court
that has convicted microsoft of their criminal activity has punished it
by blowing
On 15 March 2010 03:54, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2010-03-14 3:57 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
James, write to me off list about what is missing for you in KDE SC
4.4. I file bugs and feature requests at BKO and if something is
missing (many things still are, I know) I'd like to
Can we possibly mark this thread now as OT and preferably as OL (Off List).
It's no longer anything to do with the OP's message.
Not pointing any fingers, but it has definitely passed its sell-by date.
Thanks.
//J
-
To
On 2010-03-14 10:07 PM, James Knott wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
However, simply pointing out facts - that Windows has the vast
majority of the installed user base, or that it doesn't crash all
of the time
To which I pointed out the often illegal means MS uses to force
market share.
Which is
On 2010-03-15 4:15 AM, James Wilde wrote:
Can we possibly mark this thread now as OT and preferably as OL (Off
List). It's no longer anything to do with the OP's message.
Not pointing any fingers, but it has definitely passed its sell-by
date.
That's funny, seeing as you are the (other)
On 2010-03-15 3:57 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 15 March 2010 03:54, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2010-03-14 3:57 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
James, write to me off list about what is missing for you in KDE
SC 4.4. I file bugs and feature requests at BKO and if something
is missing
Wrong James.
:)
//J
On Mar 15, 2010, at 11:28 , Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-15 4:15 AM, James Wilde wrote:
Can we possibly mark this thread now as OT and preferably as OL (Off
List). It's no longer anything to do with the OP's message.
Not pointing any fingers, but it has definitely
In article 4b9c4b23.2050...@rogers.com, James Knott
james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-13 7:23 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
When you save a document for the first time, the Save As window
opens. At the bottom near the middle is a check box. It is labeled
In article 4b9d9671.70...@rogers.com,
James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Or is the BSOD just a myth that I've personally experienced?
I often wonder. It is certainly something that I have never experienced. And
I have been working on Microsoft systems since the early days of the IBM
Richard Travers wrote:
In article4b9c4b23.2050...@rogers.com, James Knott
james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-13 7:23 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
When you save a document for the first time, the Save As window
opens. At the bottom near the middle
On 2010-03-15 7:59 AM, Richard Travers wrote:
Interesting to see your tirade on Microsoft's business practices (no
argument there), but no mention of IBM's pivotal role in Microsoft's
success.
Or Bill Gate's foresight in seeing the bigger picture, and that the
future was in the s/w, not the
On 2010-03-15 8:16 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
ENOUGH ALREADY! And yes I am YELLING this at the top of my lungs.
STOP IT!
You're right, this should have been moved to the discuss list a long
time ago.
My apologies for being a primary instigator...
--
Charles
Tanstaafl wrote:
Cool... I'm looking forward to the day KDE is ready to run on Windows
(laughing as James spills his $beverage all over his keyboard)... ;)
http://windows.kde.org/
Need some paper towels???
-
To
Richard Travers wrote:
In article4b9c4b23.2050...@rogers.com, James Knott
james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-13 7:23 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
When you save a document for the first time, the Save As window
opens. At the bottom near the middle
On 2010-03-15 8:31 AM, James Knott wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
Cool... I'm looking forward to the day KDE is ready to run on Windows
(laughing as James spills his $beverage all over his keyboard)... ;)
http://windows.kde.org/
As I said, when it is *stable*... which it ain't even close yet, and
On 2010-03-15 7:17 AM, James Wilde wrote:
Wrong James.
:)
Wups, sorry... :)
--
Charles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
Richard Travers wrote:
In article4b9d9671.70...@rogers.com,
James Knottjames.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Or is the BSOD just a myth that I've personally experienced?
I often wonder. It is certainly something that I have never experienced. And
I have been working on Microsoft
Crap - and I just noticed that the posts I thought I was sending
privately were sent to the list, because of reply to munging.
Now that Thunderbird has proper reply-to-list capability, I'm starting
to understand the arguments against reply-to munging...
Anyway, sorry for the extra OT noise...
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:38, Richard Travers wrote:
What exactly is wrong with using an extension to identify a file type? It is
a simple, straightforward system that works.
Because that system _fails_ more often than it succeeds.
it makes it immediately obvious from the file name what
James Knott wrote:
Those were PC-DOS, CP/M-86 and pCode. I have no idea what happened to pCode,
but for whatever reason, CP/M wound up being more expensive than PC-DOS.
pCode was more expensive than CP/-86. It also was tied up in litigation
that threatened to require, via court order, that
In article c4797ebf1003150850n13d84bb2jb91cf5cba2767...@mail.gmail.com,
jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:38, Richard Travers wrote:
What exactly is wrong with using an extension to identify a file type? It
is a simple, straightforward system that
On 03/15/10 14:05, Richard Travers wrote:
In article c4797ebf1003150850n13d84bb2jb91cf5cba2767...@mail.gmail.com,
jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
This is used for:
* TeX/BibTex files;
* e-Sword Bible resources;
* Pocket e-Sword Bible resources;
* At least five other
On 3/13/2010 9:34 PM, James Knott wrote:
It's a problem in Windows, but not Linux, OS/2 and I expect Mac.
Unlike other operating systems, Windows still relies on the file
extension to determine the file type. Is the rest of the world
supposed to be stuck in the past because Microsoft can't get
On 3/14/2010 12:09 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
I have an idea about that: Maybe you can type the file suffix
yourself and then OpenOffice.org saves in that format
automatically? I don't know, didn't try it myself since I refuse
to save as anything but ODF.
That's how The GIMP works...
On 03/14/10 09:05, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/14/2010 12:09 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
I have an idea about that: Maybe you can type the file suffix
yourself and then OpenOffice.org saves in that format
automatically? I don't know, didn't try it myself since I refuse
to save as anything
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/13/2010 9:34 PM, James Knott wrote:
It's a problem in Windows, but not Linux, OS/2 and I expect Mac.
Unlike other operating systems, Windows still relies on the file
extension to determine the file type. Is the rest of the world
supposed to be stuck in the past because
In other operating systems an extension is not needed. I use Linux here,
which does not need the extension. I also used OS/2, for many years and
again the file extension is not necessary. It's only Windows that's
crippled in this regard.
What Linux is that which does not need the filename
On 14 March 2010 16:19, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/13/2010 9:34 PM, James Knott wrote:
It's a problem in Windows, but not Linux, OS/2 and I expect Mac.
Unlike other operating systems, Windows still relies on the file
extension to determine the file
Dotan Cohen wrote:
In other operating systems an extension is not needed. I use Linux here,
which does not need the extension. I also used OS/2, for many years and
again the file extension is not necessary. It's only Windows that's
crippled in this regard.
What Linux is that which
On 3/14/2010 10:12 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
On 03/14/10 09:05, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/14/2010 12:09 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
I have an idea about that: Maybe you can type the file suffix
yourself and then OpenOffice.org saves in that format
automatically? I don't know,
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I suggest you learn from the real world. You might also want to read up on
the Netscape vs Microsoft trial about how MS claimed they couldn't remove
Internet Explorer, because it was part of the operating system, even though
at the time it wasn't. However, with the next
On 3/14/2010 10:19 AM, James Knott wrote:
I have worked with computers for over 34 years. I have worked at IBM
providing 3rd level support for OS/2 and Windows. I have used Linux
for many years. In short, I have a lot of hands on experience with
Linux, Windows, OS/2 and other. I am speaking
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/14/2010 10:19 AM, James Knott wrote:
I have worked with computers for over 34 years. I have worked at IBM
providing 3rd level support for OS/2 and Windows. I have used Linux
for many years. In short, I have a lot of hands on experience with
Linux, Windows, OS/2 and
On 3/14/2010 10:39 AM, James Knott wrote:
The list goes on and on, proving that Microsoft is a very unethical
company, that does not hesitate to use illegal means to force market
share.
All of which, while true, has absolutely nothing to do with what you
were replying to, or the issue under
On 3/14/2010 11:01 AM, James Knott wrote:
If fanboism is expecting reliable, safe computing, then I'm guilty
of it.
Fanboism is making totally ridiculous and unsubstantiated claims about
one product vs another.
Both of your claims are in that category.
Properly installed and maintained,
That's not been my experience. I verified it last night before I posted, by
turning off automatic file name extension and creating a file. OOo had no
problem opening it, when I clicked on the file. I run the KDE desktop. I
can't say either way about Gnome, as I don't use it. I also used
Dotan Cohen wrote:
That's not been my experience. I verified it last night before I posted, by
turning off automatic file name extension and creating a file. OOo had no
problem opening it, when I clicked on the file. I run the KDE desktop. I
can't say either way about Gnome, as I don't use
Thanks for the info. I appreciate it. Ann
--- On Sat, 3/13/10, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
Subject: Re: [users] Help needed
To: users@openoffice.org, aglo...@yahoo.com
Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 7:27 PM
Ann wrote:
When I initially
I wonder if there's a difference between KDE 4 and 3.x, which I use.
That could be.
James, write to me off list about what is missing for you in KDE SC
4.4. I file bugs and feature requests at BKO and if something is
missing (many things still are, I know) I'd like to know about it so
that I
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:00:22AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/13/2010 9:34 PM, James Knott wrote:
It's a problem in Windows, but not Linux, OS/2 and I expect Mac.
Unlike other operating systems, Windows still relies on the file
extension to determine the file type. Is the rest of the
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Windows, how does that fact negate the equally-valid fact that Windows has a
larger install base of users?
That larger base is a direct result of the ongoing criminal activity
that microsoft has engaged in for the last twenty odd years. This
ongoing criminal enterprise
On 2010-03-14 5:09 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:00:22AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/13/2010 9:34 PM, James Knott wrote:
It's a problem in Windows, but not Linux, OS/2 and I expect Mac.
Unlike other operating systems, Windows still relies on the file
extension to
On 2010-03-14 3:57 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
James, write to me off list about what is missing for you in KDE SC
4.4. I file bugs and feature requests at BKO and if something is
missing (many things still are, I know) I'd like to know about it so
that I could file an issue. Thanks!
Ummm... are
Tanstaafl wrote:
However, simply pointing out facts - that Windows has the vast majority
of the installed user base, or that it doesn't crash all of the time
To which I pointed out the often illegal means MS uses to force market
share. They sure didn't get there by producing quality products.
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-14 3:57 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
James, write to me off list about what is missing for you in KDE SC
4.4. I file bugs and feature requests at BKO and if something is
missing (many things still are, I know) I'd like to know about it so
that I could file an issue.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:51:44PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
..snip..
James, your fanboism is really boring.
As is yours.
? what pray tell are you talking about? And spare me if you are going to
try to equate my criticism of James' blatant fanboism as the
2010/3/13 Ann aglo...@yahoo.com:
When I initially started using openoffice in lieu of microsoft word I had no
problems. For some reason something changed and docs saved as office with
.doc extension do not keep the extension when attached in an email. Also,
They don't appear in the
Ann wrote:
When I initially started using openoffice in lieu of microsoft word I had no
problems. For some reason something changed and docs saved as office with .doc
extension do not keep the extension when attached in an email. Also, They
don't appear in the directory as a .doc.
On 2010-03-13 7:23 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
When you save a document for the first time, the Save As window
opens. At the bottom near the middle is a check box. It is labeled
Automatic file name extension. This should be checked. Normally, it
is, but if you accidentally unchecked it, it
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-13 7:23 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
When you save a document for the first time, the Save As window
opens. At the bottom near the middle is a check box. It is labeled
Automatic file name extension. This should be checked. Normally, it
is, but if you accidentally
2010/3/13 Richard Detwiler rlsha...@aol.com:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-13 7:23 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
When you save a document for the first time, the Save As window
opens. At the bottom near the middle is a check box. It is labeled
Automatic file name extension. This should be
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:40:45AM -0500, Richard Detwiler wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
Which begs the question - why is that checkbox even there? All it does
is cause this problem (our users have been bit by it a lot too)...
Good question -- not sure why anyone would ever have the need or
Ann wrote:
When I initially started using openoffice in lieu of microsoft word I had no
problems. For some reason something changed and docs saved as office with .doc
extension do not keep the extension when attached in an email. Also, They
don't appear in the directory as a .doc.
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-13 7:23 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
When you save a document for the first time, the Save As window
opens. At the bottom near the middle is a check box. It is labeled
Automatic file name extension. This should be checked. Normally, it
is, but if you
Richard Detwiler wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-13 7:23 AM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
When you save a document for the first time, the Save As window
opens. At the bottom near the middle is a check box. It is labeled
Automatic file name extension. This should be checked. Normally, it
is,
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
Good question -- not sure why anyone would ever have the need or desire to
save a file w/o the file name extension.
I have an idea about that: Maybe you can type the file suffix yourself
and then OpenOffice.org saves in that format automatically? I don't
know,
On 03/13/10 20:36, James Knott wrote:
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
Good question -- not sure why anyone would ever have the need or
desire to save a file w/o the file name extension.
I have an idea about that: Maybe you can type the file suffix
yourself and then OpenOffice.org saves in that
When I initially started using openoffice in lieu of microsoft word I had no
problems. For some reason something changed and docs saved as office with .doc
extension do not keep the extension when attached in an email. Also, They
don't appear in the directory as a .doc. Something is screwy
Hallo,
I'd like to do something with a database and a spreadsheet, but
am a bit stuck because I don't know hot to start/do it.
What I'd like to do:
Have a database with entries like:
name. ingredient1, ingredient2..ingredientn
In a spreadsheet:
enter a name
find the name and ingredients in the
Hallo Brian,
Op zaterdag 06 juni 2009 schreef Brian Barker aan Hans Beekhuizen:
BB I'm not sure why you need a database here: perhaps you don't.
BB If the database is to contain only a table of names and
BB ingredients, a spreadsheet would serve just as well.
I was thinking about a database,
2008/7/6 David Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:00 , Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
These come from soffice.bin. Jucy:
So you've tracked the source of the error down to OpenOffice itself.
I'm out of my depth here, so hopefully somebody else on the list has an
On Jul 4, 2008, at 20:22 , Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
I am trying to get OO 2.4 to run on my 10.5.4 system.
In the past, I used 2.0 and 2.2 on a 10.4.{4-11} system, and it
worked fine.
I have upgrade my system to 10.5
I have installed the X11 upgrade from the optional installs.
I
I am trying to get OO 2.4 to run on my 10.5.4 system.
In the past, I used 2.0 and 2.2 on a 10.4.{4-11} system, and it worked fine.
snip
I'll do my best. 1st off, here's the background: Tiger and earlier
versions of OS X used the trusty/rusty X11R6. For Leopard, Apple made the
On Jul 5, 2008, at 11:13 , Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
Ok, the current behavior:
1. X11 now starts up nicely, as needed.
I can even run xlsclients, and the X server will start up. All good.
2. If I click on the OOo 2.4 launcher, then I get an xterm window. A
few seconds later, I get
You never actually told us whether or not you applied the Xquartz
2.2.3 package, or indeed what version of X11 you have. Other than that,
open up /Applications/Utilities/Console and check for recent logs.
2.2.3 package just installed.
Console log:
xlsclients to start up X:
Jul 5
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:00 , Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
These come from soffice.bin. Jucy:
Jul 5 11:56:41 ip72-205-206-251 soffice.bin[13859]: ***
_NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x2b53c20 of class NSCFArray
autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking\nStack: (0x935c3bbc
I am trying to get OO 2.4 to run on my 10.5.4 system.
In the past, I used 2.0 and 2.2 on a 10.4.{4-11} system, and it worked fine.
I have upgrade my system to 10.5
I have installed the X11 upgrade from the optional installs.
I have used software update check, and it tells me that I have the
Dear sir/ma'am,
I was thinking of downloading open office2. But I had a doubt regarding the
same. Suppose I create a presentation using open office, will i be able to run
this presentation(with all th effects etc) on computer not using open office?
Thanking You
Nikhil George
From
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Nikhil George wrote:
Dear sir/ma'am,
I was thinking of downloading open office2. But I had a doubt
regarding the same. Suppose I create a presentation using open office,
will i be able to run this presentation(with all th effects
etc) on computer not
Nikhil George wrote:
Dear sir/ma'am,
I was thinking of downloading open office2. But I had a doubt regarding the same. Suppose I create a presentation using open office, will i be able to run this presentation(with all th effects etc) on computer not using open office?
Thanking You
Nikhil
2008/1/25, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 25 January 2008 09:02:15 Kimber Nohr wrote:
I really hope someone here can help me. I am 2 weeks behind in my
billing
and that is pretty serious for our business. I am feeling rather
desperate...please help.
I recently completely lost my
On Friday 25 January 2008 09:02:15 Kimber Nohr wrote:
I really hope someone here can help me. I am 2 weeks behind in my billing
and that is pretty serious for our business. I am feeling rather
desperate...please help.
I recently completely lost my MS Office Suite and downloaded OO as a most
I really hope someone here can help me. I am 2 weeks behind in my billing
and that is pretty serious for our business. I am feeling rather
desperate...please help.
I recently completely lost my MS Office Suite and downloaded OO as a most
excellent replacement. I have been doing well with
2008/1/25, Kimber Nohr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I apologize...didn't mean to offend. I have never done this before and am
completely unfamiliar with this forum of asking for help. I am not yet
familiar with the proper etiquette, but will do my best to pick up on it
and
learn quickly. Is there a
I apologize...didn't mean to offend. I have never done this before and am
completely unfamiliar with this forum of asking for help. I am not yet
familiar with the proper etiquette, but will do my best to pick up on it and
learn quickly. Is there a way I can go back and change the title of my
I have uploaded the screenshots at mytempdir site. Below is the link to
access the file uploaded. Hope it will clear my problem.
http://www.mytempdir.com/1272049
Is there any possibility to rectify the above mentioned problem?
OpenOffice.org converts Microsoft Word documents quite well in
On 21/03/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Greetings!
We have come across your e-mail id from OpenOffice site.
We are using OpenOffice in order to convert input byte array in MSWord
format into output byte array in PDF format on the fly before displaying
the document to
2007/3/21, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Greetings!
We have come across your e-mail id from OpenOffice site.
We are using OpenOffice in order to convert input byte array in MSWord
format into output byte array in PDF format on the fly before displaying
the document to the end user
Hi Rohit
We are using OpenOffice in order to convert input byte array in MSWord
format into output byte array in PDF format on the fly before displaying
the document to the end user on internet. We are facing a problem in one
type of the document conversion. I am attaching a screenshot in order
Hi,
Greetings!
We have come across your e-mail id from OpenOffice site.
We are using OpenOffice in order to convert input byte array in MSWord
format into output byte array in PDF format on the fly before displaying
the document to the end user on internet. We are facing a problem in one
2006/11/27, Dan Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 27 November 2006 12:35 pm, Roshanak Razavi wrote:
I am a new Mac user. I recently Installed Open office that required
me to have X11. For some time it was working very well until there
was an update for X11. after I updated X11, my open
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 03:05 am, Guy Voets wrote:
2006/11/27, Dan Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 27 November 2006 12:35 pm, Roshanak Razavi wrote:
I am a new Mac user. I recently Installed Open office that
required me to have X11. For some time it was working very well
until
Good link, but how does this reply help the OP who is not
subscribed? If anyone replies to one of my emails to this list,
please always check for a listed CC. This indicates that I know the
OP is not subscribed. In such cases, please include the email address
in the CC of my email so that
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
