> Anshul Chauhan wrote:
> > we have to copy KAM.cf to /usr/share/spamassassin only for its
> > integration with spamassassin or something else is to done
> >
> > I'm using spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el4.rf on Centos4.7
On 30.06.09 02:11, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Any add-on rules should be placed in the sa
Anshul Chauhan wrote:
> we have to copy KAM.cf to /usr/share/spamassassin only for its
> integration with spamassassin or something else is to done
>
> I'm using spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el4.rf on Centos4.7
Any add-on rules should be placed in the same directory as your local.cf
(ie: /etc/mail/spamas
we have to copy KAM.cf to /usr/share/spamassassin only for its integration
with spamassassin or something else is to done
I'm using spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el4.rf on Centos4.7
Warm Regards,
Anshul Chauhan
"Dream is not what you see while sleep, it's the thing that does not let you
sleep."
On Sat,
On 26.06.09 23:05, Roland Klein Overmeer wrote:
> I'm new to the list, and haven't been working with Spamassasin for long
> (about 1 year). It worked fine filtering spam, but now more and more are
> getting through. I found something called RulesDuJour on the net, but it
> seems it's not being upda
"R
> I'm new to the list, and haven't been working with Spamassasin for
> long (about 1 year). It worked fine filtering spam, but now more and
> more are getting through. I found something called RulesDuJour on
> the net, but it seems it's not being updated anymore. Is it usefull
> to stil use it,
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 23:05 -0500, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
> @Andy - I was able to parse the script that you sent me to which had
> neither my problem nor my solution
Actually it DID contain your problem AND the solution:
# Version 1.31 NOTICE! Rules du jour is no longer being maintained. As
the
@Andy - I was able to parse the script that you sent me to which had neither
my problem nor my solution within it but I did find 1 problem. On my config
it was listed as 99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf as well as the script that you sent a
link to. However, located at the download site it was 88_FVGT_Tripwir
Curtis LaMasters wrote:
> Now on to my next issue. Thank you Dan for helping me with the last
> one. I have RulesDuJour updating (probably too often) but I'm getting
> the following error. I've been able to find the issue on Google but
> no resolution. Hoping you can help me figure this out.
RD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking of looking into RulesDuJour as an alternative to
sa-update, as there hasn't been anything to update since July, unless
one installs yet unreleased versions of SpamAssassin. ("find var -ls"
to check.)
Why are you so concerned about updates for the sake of
I was thinking of looking into RulesDuJour as an alternative to
sa-update, as there hasn't been anything to update since July, unless
one installs yet unreleased versions of SpamAssassin. ("find var -ls"
to check.)
However reading this thread has scared me further.
(Shall I chuck Santa Claus (rms
>> The page describes how to select what channels sa-update
>> will update. You'll just have an extra sa-update in your
>> crontab; one for the official SA rules and one for the SARE rules.
>>
>
> I have only one sa-update in my crontab
Yes, sorry, it can be done using 1 sa-update line; I actual
>> What channels sa-update updates?
>>
>> And if I use the '--channelfile' what happens? Maybe
>> sa-update updates only the channels included in the file
>> specifided for the argument '--channelfile' or it adds
>> the file listed to the default list of channels
>> maintained by sa-update?
>
>
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
>> But it is.
>>
>> RulesDuJour delivery is broken, and it gives only HTTP-error page,
>> which causes the error.
>>
>> sa-update can deliver the rules without errors.
>
> However, I already use sa-update other than RulesDuJour, which is
> scheduled as follow:
The webp
> But it is.
>
> RulesDuJour delivery is broken, and it gives only HTTP-error
> page, which causes the error.
>
> sa-update can deliver the rules without errors.
However, I already use sa-update other than RulesDuJour, which is
scheduled as follow:
22 14 * * 1,2,3,4,5 sa-update && rcamavis
>> Using sa-update is the suggested method now:
>>
>> http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
>
> I don't think that this is related to the error discussed
> in this thread.
>
> rocsca
But it is.
RulesDuJour delivery is broken, and it gives only HTTP-error page, which c
> Using sa-update is the suggested method now:
>
> http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
I don't think that this is related to the error discussed in this
thread.
rocsca
Rocco Scappatura schrieb:
Hello,
It is some weeks that I get errors while I try to updates the SA
rulesets.
For example recently I get an error after the update of TripWire and
SARE rulesets:
***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssass
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:25 -0600, Reg Clemens wrote:
> I am getting the following error message from my (daily) update of
> SpamAssassin
> Rules
>
> ---
>
> Subject: RulesDuJour/deneb.dwf.com: 404 errors
>
>
>
> The following rules had errors:
> SARE 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf Ruleset had a
To:
Sent: Thursday, 2007, June 28 15:31
Subject: Re: RulesDuJour lint failed. Updates rolled back.
This must be an issue that needs to be raised with Prolexic, as they are
doing the DDoS protection for rulesemporium.com.
Can anyone reproduce this redirect outside of RDJ, and give me a dump of
t
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:56 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> By running a curl hit repeatedly on the RE server I reproduced the
> problem.
By running this test a couple of times I'm apparently now blocked by
RE :-P
Oh well .
Hope the info I sent was useful.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "In an
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 17:31 -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> This must be an issue that needs to be raised with Prolexic, as they are
> doing the DDoS protection for rulesemporium.com.
>
> Can anyone reproduce this redirect outside of RDJ, and give me a dump of
> the full transaction including ht
This must be an issue that needs to be raised with Prolexic, as they are
doing the DDoS protection for rulesemporium.com.
Can anyone reproduce this redirect outside of RDJ, and give me a dump of
the full transaction including http headers?
I'd rather fix the actual problem and not patch aroun
This problem is probably due to the way Rules Emporium is handling
traffic. If requests come too fast from the same address, or if their
server is busy, they send an HTML redirect page instructing the client
to try again in 0.1 second. Curl and wget don't understand "" and simply store the refres
>>
>Daryl is right, there is no fix due in 3.2.2 - I got the RDJ and the
>sa-update errors confused. I guess maybe I should dye my hair blonde.
>
>Apologies for any confusion I've caused.
>
Geez - blonde it is - it's sa-compile not sa-update!
I wonder if McDonalds have any jobs going :-/
Kind r
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:42:39 -0400, "Daryl C. W. O'Shea"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:48:02 -0400, David Boltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
>>> updates for a few weeks now.
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:48:02 -0400, David Boltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
updates for a few weeks now. Yes this would be since the DDoS attacks
on rulesemporium. It looks like the same problem people ha
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:18:28 +0200, Matthias Haegele
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nigel Frankcom schrieb:
>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:48:02 -0400, David Boltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
>>> updates for a few weeks now. Ye
Nigel Frankcom schrieb:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:48:02 -0400, David Boltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
updates for a few weeks now. Yes this would be since the DDoS attacks
on rulesemporium. It looks like the same problem people
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:48:02 -0400, David Boltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
>updates for a few weeks now. Yes this would be since the DDoS attacks
>on rulesemporium. It looks like the same problem people have been
>having with
David Boltz schrieb:
I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
updates for a few weeks now. Yes this would be since the DDoS attacks
[RDJ Problems ...]
btw:
Are there any additional things to know/caveats if i want to use
sa-update channels for RDJ:
(besides adding t
Matt Kettler writes:
> 2) Antidrug is a part of SA as of SA 3.0.0. If you're using antidrug
> with SA 3.0.0 or higher, you're possibly downgrading your antidrug
> rules. Unless you're using SA 2.64 or lower, you should remove
> antidrug.cf from your system completely.
>
> 3) If I ever make update
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
>>> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix?
>>>
>> Don't take this the wrong way, but did you read the erro
On Thursday 25 January 2007 12:33, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:20:09 -0500, Gene Heskett
>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>>On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
I got this email from Rules_Du_
On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix?
>
>Don't take this the wrong way, but did you read the errors at all?
>
>> Lint output: [16404] warn: config
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:20:09 -0500, Gene Heskett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix?
>>
>>Don't take this the wro
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I got this email from Rules_Du_Jour this morning, what is the fix?
Don't take this the wrong way, but did you read the errors at all?
> Lint output: [16404] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README:
> [16404] warn: config
On 8-Dec-2006, at 01:46, Mike Kenny wrote:
The configuration that I inherited had only got
TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE
SARE_EVILNUMBERS0 SARE_RANDOM"; in /etc/rulesdujour/config. This
obviously
allows a lot of spam to filter through (or at elaast would allow
the rules
to become outdated). Lo
Sorry about that! It's fixed now and 1.29b is available on the web site.
Max Matslofva wrote:
Hi
RulesDuJour 1.29 tries to fetch 70_sare_stocks.cf from
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf
The correct URL for 70_sare_stocks.cf is
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sa
Ernie Dunbar wrote:
In another thread, I noticed that someone had a SARE ruleset for stock
scams and the like. Since they had been plaguing us constantly in recent
months, I decided I should get rules_du_jour to update that ruleset for
us.
I quickly found out that rules_du_jour was horribly out
Oops, I musta missed that part. Hmm.. Maybe I could make a copy of
dujour that just looked for updates to blacklist_uri.
-Original Message-
From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:44 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RulesduJour
At 07:38 AM 11/2/2006, you wrote:
I have it set to go about about every six hours yet blacklist_uri always
seems to have an update. Is there any reason I couldn't up it to like
every four hours? Would that stress the rules servers a bit too much?
How often does everyone else update?
Well con
#Ronan McGlue wrote:
> can someone give me a listing of the latest timestamps regarding their
> rulesdujour updates?
> I've just noticed that none of the files have been updated on my
> machine since mid augaust... surely this isn't normal...
>
> thanks
>
> Ronan
>
I just updated antidrug this past
#Ronan McGlue wrote:
> can someone give me a listing of the latest timestamps regarding their
> rulesdujour updates?
> I've just noticed that none of the files have been updated on my
> machine since mid augaust... surely this isn't normal...
No, it's fairly normal. SARE_STOCKS is the only one th
BG Mahesh wrote:
> hi
>
> /etc/rulesdujour/config reads,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RulesDuJour]# more /etc/rulesdujour/config
> TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1 SARE_URI0
> SARE_URI1"
There are quite a few good rule sets from SARE. You may want to go to
www.rulesemporium
On Tuesday August 15 2006 12:41 pm, BG Mahesh wrote:
> hi
>
> /etc/rulesdujour/config reads,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RulesDuJour]# more /etc/rulesdujour/config
> TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1
> SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1"
> SA_DIR="/etc/mail/spamassassin"
> MAIL_ADDRESS="[EMAIL
I don't administer the SonicWall personally, but it has a "pro-active" web
filter, using rules that nobody here completely comprehends, to block
categories of Web Content.
The category that this URL was hitting was "Free Software Downloads".
We're a fairly small organization so it's easy for
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 09:19 -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
> I have found the problem: "Never underestimate the power of your own systems
> to make you feel dumb!".
>
> It seems that our SonicWall firewall, sometime recently, had decided that
> this
> was a forbidden site, so the "403" error was d
I have found the problem: "Never underestimate the power of your own systems
to make you feel dumb!".
It seems that our SonicWall firewall, sometime recently, had decided that this
was a forbidden site, so the "403" error was due to my own firewall blocking
access.
Have since "unblocked" the
My cron job runs once a day, at 21:15.
I just tried it, manually, and still get:
Rules Du Jour Run Summary:RulesDuJour Run Summary on strongbad:
The following rules had errors:
William Stearn's RANDOM WORD Ruleset was not retrieved because of: 403 from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blac
f you have
received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and
then delete the message from your computer system immediately.
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 9:21 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: R
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> On Monday June 26 2006 5:17 pm, you wrote:
>
> > Well that's just itI don't know where it's getting these. I
> > don't have SARE_URI2 in my rules_du_jour file to update. The
> > listing for the "ARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM" is listed as
> > "SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM". I can't
On Monday June 26 2006 5:17 pm, you wrote:
Tracey Gates wrote ..
> Well that's just itI don't know where it's getting these. I
> don't have SARE_URI2 in my rules_du_jour file to update. The
> listing for the "ARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM" is listed as
> "SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM". I can't seem to find
you have
received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and
then delete the message from your computer system immediately.
-Original Message-
From: David Filion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 3:55 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rule
Tracey Gates wrote:
I'm getting the following messages from the RulesDuJour run:
RulesDuJour Run Summary on yoursummit.com:
No index found for ruleset named ARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM. Check that this
ruleset is still valid.
SARE Top 200 spamcop ip addresses Ruleset (automatically generated) has
ch
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:26:25AM +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have to disable
> the SPF list from RDJ also, thank you.
FWIW, rules that require plugins should be wrapped in "ifplugin/endif"
containers. Especially if those rules are b
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Freitag, 24. März 2006 09:01 Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Is the SPF plugin enabled? The syntax looks fine, but it can't be
parsed if the plugin isn't loaded.
ARghl. I should not work late night... Thanks.
As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have
On Freitag, 24. März 2006 09:01 Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Is the SPF plugin enabled? The syntax looks fine, but it can't be
> parsed if the plugin isn't loaded.
ARghl. I should not work late night... Thanks.
As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have to disable
the SPF list
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Anybody else got this problem? Lots of warnings suddenly.
mfg zmi
[31721] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
whitelist_from_spf[EMAIL PROTECTED] [31721] warn: config:
failed to parse line, skipping: whitelist_from_spf
Is the SPF plugin enabled? T
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 15:01 +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 11:42 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> > Yousef Raffah wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> > >> Hi Yousef,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the interne
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 11:42 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> Yousef Raffah wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> >> Hi Yousef,
> >>
> >>
> >>> I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
> >>> not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to cha
Yousef Raffah wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
Hi Yousef,
I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to change the line
in /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
To this:
[ "${CURL_OPTS}" ]
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> Hi Yousef,
>
>
> >
> > I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
> > not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to change the line
> > in /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
> > To this:
> > [ "${CURL_OPT
Title: RE: RulesDuJour Recommendation
>
> Yea...those are really good. I didn't mention them as they
> are enabled
> by default in the latest SA versions. At least, they are if
> the network
> tests in general are enabled.
>
URIBL isn't on by default. Ju
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 07:47 am, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> Don't forget to use URIBL and SURBL Joey. They will stop a ton of spam.
Indeed they do, but..
If you are one of those poor souls who are still using dialup AND you have to
restart your system while offline, spamassassin will not s
Joey wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting worse.
> In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using RulesDuJour.
> What I would like to know is which rules are you using without too much
> headache so that we can implement them into ou
Loren Wilton wrote:
> > These are the ones that I use. I haven't had any problems with
> > them.
> >
> > SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
> > SARE_GENLSUBJ0
> > SARE_HTML0
> > SARE_HEADER0
> > SARE_OBFU0
> > SARE_URI0
>
> I would add that most people could probably run the "1" versions of
> the above "0" rule
> These are the ones that I use. I haven't had any problems with them.
>
> SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
> SARE_GENLSUBJ0
> SARE_HTML0
> SARE_HEADER0
> SARE_OBFU0
> SARE_URI0
I would add that most people could probably run the "1" versions of the
above "0" rule files *in addition to the "0" version* with abs
> I am, and have been for a while, using SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_HTML
> SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM TRIPWIRE EVILNUMBERS SARE_RANDOM SARE_WHITELIST
> SARE_OBFU SARE_STOCKS SARE_SPOOF to good effect (though someone will
> probably tell me that at least one of those is no longer advisable).
Nope, all s
Chris Santerre wrote:
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Joey wrote:
> > >
> > > As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting
> > > worse. In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using
> > > RulesDuJour. What I would like to know is which rules are you
Title: RE: RulesDuJour Recommendation
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:09 AM
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: RE: RulesDuJour Recommendation
>
>
> Joey wrote:
> >
> > As I
Hi Yousef,
I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to change the line
in /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
To this:
[ "${CURL_OPTS}" ] || CURL_OPTS="-w %{http_code} --compressed -O -R -s
-S -z -x proxy.nour.net.
Joey wrote:
>
> As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting
> worse. In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using
> RulesDuJour. What I would like to know is which rules are you using
> without too much headache so that we can implement them into our
> configuration.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I'm sure you are aware the spam these days seems to be getting worse.
> In an attempt to be more aggressive we started using RulesDuJour.
> What I would like to know is which rules are you using without too much
>
On Sunday 04 December 2005 22:46, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
>--max-conn-per-child=50
?? Thats also odd, 3.04 has been running just fine with that single
dash option for at least 6 months. Wierd. Anyway I put it back in
like above, and that works. Now to figure out why, with a -m5 setting,
its only
From: "Bob McClure Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 10:41:07PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings folks;
I just installed RulesDuJour, and ran it once by hand. It wasn't
labeling the subject line, so I edited my local.cf to turn that on,
didn't change anything else, but now a
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greetings folks;
I just installed RulesDuJour, and ran it once by hand. It wasn't
labeling the subject line, so I edited my local.cf to turn that on,
didn't change anything else, but now a 'service spamd restart'
fails with this error message nomograph:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 10:41:07PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings folks;
>
> I just installed RulesDuJour, and ran it once by hand. It wasn't
> labeling the subject line, so I edited my local.cf to turn that on,
> didn't change anything else, but now a 'service spamd restart'
> fails with
Hi Bob,
Thanks for this explanation; It solved my problem.
It turned out in /usr/share/spamassassin a translation-file was causing the
problems.
Cheers,
Thijs
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: zondag 25 september 2005 1:46
> Aan: Th
r 2005 15:46
Aan: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: RulesDuJour; lint failes
Did you just move from 2.64 or earlier? It looks like you have some
pre-3.0-only rules files. SOme of these appear to be standard SA
rules files.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "Thijs Koetsie
2005 15:46
Aan: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: RulesDuJour; lint failes
Did you just move from 2.64 or earlier? It looks like you have some
pre-3.0-only rules files. SOme of these appear to be standard SA
rules files.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "Thijs Koe
Spamassassin 3 on this
> server since I installed it.
>
> Cheers,
> Thijs
>
>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>> Van: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Verzonden: vrijdag 23 september 2005 15:46
>> Aan: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Onderw
n.apache.org
> Onderwerp: Re: RulesDuJour; lint failes
>
> Did you just move from 2.64 or earlier? It looks like you have some
> pre-3.0-only rules files. SOme of these appear to be standard SA
> rules files.
>
> Loren
>
> - Original Message -
>
Did you just move from 2.64 or earlier? It looks like you have some
pre-3.0-only rules files. SOme of these appear to be standard SA rules
files.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "Thijs Koetsier | Exception" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 5:02 AM
Subject:
Hiya Thijs,
Thijs Koetsier | Exception IT wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using spamassassin 3.0.4-2 on Debian 3.1 with Exim4, together with
RulesDuJour.
I have a question about the last, which I just installed for the first time.
I believe it's a fairly beginners-one, which I hope someone can help me
with
Jason Marshall wrote:
Yes! You should be able to add these directly to the config file in
the same way you are (I believe) currently adding them to the
built-in registry.
Thanks, Chris, do they just get added to the bottom, or do they need
to be contained in some kind of $variable="" decla
Yes! You should be able to add these directly to the config file in the same
way you are (I believe) currently adding them to the built-in registry.
Thanks, Chris, do they just get added to the bottom, or do they need to be
contained in some kind of $variable="" declaration?
Nope, it looks
Jason Marshall wrote:
When a new rules_du_jour is released, it downloads it, and i have to
manually add the "Personal Rule" snippets to the script again.
Is there a way to put those in the /etc/rulesdujour/config file so
that they don't need to be re-added all the time?
Yes! You should
Hi Peter,
Peter Kiem wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed there is a buildup of old rules in my
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour directory like this
109543 May 10 19:07 bogus-virus-warnings.cf
92609 Aug 10 2004 bogus-virus-warnings.cf.20040819-0402
93896 Aug 19 2004 bogus-virus-warnings.cf.20040823-0423
On Monday, April 4, 2005, 8:25:38 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Chris Santerre wrote:
>>I shall remove Bigevil info from the site tomorrow.
> Actually, if you wouldn't mind, Take the info down and replace it with a
> notice that the ruleset is dead and point them to using SURBL instead.
A good sugges
Chris Santerre wrote:
>I'm not involved in RDJ or bigevil, and I'm only very
>> slightly involved in
>> SARE, so I can't comment here.
>
>
>
>Slightly? You seem to forget how good your KungFu is ;)
>
No, I remember how good my KungFu is.. I just know I rarely have time to
use it for the be
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:40 AM
> To: Jim Knuth; Pete Geenhuizen
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
>
>
> At 02:13 PM 4/3/2005, Ji
At 02:13 PM 4/3/2005, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
Sorry, I don`t know. What say Matt Kettler? ;)
Hmmm, someone mentioned my name and has summoned me to this thread... hmmm..
1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page is
On Sunday, April 3, 2005, 10:34:12 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
> 2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use
> ws.surbl.org?
Yes, please use ws.surbl.org instead:
http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page isn't very clear and still
has info on how to use it with RDJ?
2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use
ws.surbl.org?
Hallo und guten Abend Pete,
danke für die Email vom 03.04.2005 um 19:34
Pete Geenhuizen schrieb - wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
Sorry, I don`t know. What say Matt Kettler? ;)
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page isn't very clear and still
has info on how to use it with RDJ?
2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use
ws.surbl.org?
Pete
--
"Unencumber
Hallo und guten Tag Pete,
danke für die Email vom 03.04.2005 um 18:52
Pete Geenhuizen schrieb - wrote:
> I've been getting the following error for a couple of days.
> The following rules had errors:
> Big Evil not found (404) at
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bigevil.cf
> Big Evil was not
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:44 AM
To: Dimitri Yioulos
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RulesDuJour problem - help please
Hi Dimitri,
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Happy New Year to all.
>
> I&#x
Hi Dimitri,
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Happy New Year to all.
I’ve searched the list archive, and found some references to my
problem, but no solutions, so here goes again (sorry for the long
post, but I want to provide as much info. as necessary):
I recently upgraded to spamassassin 3.0.2 running o
oulos
Subject: Re: RulesDuJour problem - help please
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: Rate limiting
in effect
Notice the text between and .
You can only get the rules a maximum of I believe 3 times in a 24 hour
period. Since they don't change very often, this is mor
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
