2 wheels in the front, ewww.
This one is a 2 wheeler...
http://ecobike.diytrade.com/sdp/462663/4/pd-2542849/3022998-1264277/Electric_Folding_Bike.html
But it's funny that the motor for New Zealand, Australia and Singapore has a
200W motor but USA has 500W...
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:37 AM,
That's not how inductive or resonant transfer works.
Imagine a magnet rotating in space end over end, does it's field radiate
like rays of light? No.
Does it lose (radiate) much energy? No.
However it is possible to tap energy from it if close enough to it.
Now as for the ring of metal, did you
A magician was employed to make Panama disappear I think it was, saw a thing
on it recently...
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:04 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
From: Mr. Beaty
...
Re: [Vo]:Progress in invisibility cloaks
...
Years ago I recall seeing
It was the port of Alexandria and Suez Canal, hidden by Jasper Maskelyne..
The show was the pilot of That's impossible with Jonathan Frakes...
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:23 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
A magician was employed to make Panama disappear I think it was, saw a
thing
Infected by the virus of the mind that makes you press the button again and
again...
Except for blowing the world up it's harmless...
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Sun, 30 Aug
2009
20:14:29 -0500:
Hi,
Can the point be made that incase anyone incredibly green just dropped on
the list, this is a joke and Magniwork is a scam.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
As advertised by Robert Park 8^) in his What's New, get info on where to
buy your kit for
Has a suitably constructed (magnetic steel?) slip ring been shown not to
produce the effect?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
It's hard to see how AM balances; that's true. However, take a look at
the attached jpeg,
such a contact in many ways.
Would it not be good to identify if the ball bearings play a real part in
this?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Harry Veeder hvee...@ncf.ca wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, August 20, 2009 9:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo
1: High Impact Interval Training - So called cardio is bad for heart health2:
Vitamin C and Lycine - rebuilds the heart and ateries see Linus Pauling
3: Ubiquinol - Especially good for CHF, effective cure
4: Cayenne Pepper immediately if a heart attack hits, can revive patients
5: Instead of a
Looks like he ripped off:
http://www.rexresearch.com/craig/craig.htm
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
You didn't like the 100th Monkey recital?
Terry
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
This research is
You mean a man biting dog story surely?
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Steven Krivit
stev...@newenergytimes.comwrote:
Jed - I'm waiting for the man bites dog story.
At 02:34 PM 7/24/2009, you wrote:
Ho-hum news:
:
John Berry wrote:
I made a simple so-called Tesla Coil, the secondary is a pancake coil
without top electrode and has a resonant frequency of 760khz, the
primary circuit is a NST and I have used microwave diodes to rectify it
so the coil is run on DC.
Most of the time I have the Variac
the arc despite having a
larger capacitance it manifested the effect only weakly.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
John Berry wrote:
I connected a signal generator to the secondary and hung the
oscilloscope lead in the air, that is how i found
I should have said a point concentrates charge and electric field density,
it does not concentrate voltage.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:45 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I'm not sure it is silly, counter intuitive but *maybe* right.
A point concentrates charges and voltage
I made a simple so-called Tesla Coil, the secondary is a pancake coil
without top electrode and has a resonant frequency of 760khz, the primary
circuit is a NST and I have used microwave diodes to rectify it so the coil
is run on DC.
Most of the time I have the Variac set to severely limit the
reception of the high frequency, preferably the high
frequency coil would sit inside the low frequency coil.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Harvey Norris harv...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 7/15/09, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
From: John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo
Replying only to the answer and only to a part of the answer...
Lenz law indeed insists the the induction is 90 degrees out of phase,
however if a current is allowed to flow in the receiving coil then it's self
inductance will cause the phase to be pushed as far as 180 degrees out.
If the phase
That's the spirit!
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:09 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to OrionWorks's message of Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:28:05 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
They came.
They knocked on our door. We pretended nobody was home.
They got the hint.
They left.
...we ended up getting
You miss the point though.Personally to me it looks fake, probably because I
am not used to seeing glowing plasma ring UFO's, and possibly because
something didn't fit (for example no glow on clouds that I recall seeing).
There is a strong bias which requires extraordinary proof to prove
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:22 PM, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.comwrote:
John,
You have stated:
I saw this and then read his comment, so I knew
what he was talking about and I had the same objection,
this disproves the person claiming his 10 year old faked it.
There are many prosaic
The story is fake as Robin points out, the UFO look digital to me but then
again some real things can do. (and the best CGI can probably fool anyone)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:30 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:30:36 -0500:
Hi,
Robin can answer what he did and did not mean, however I have no doubt he
saw what I did.
The claim is that it is just a reflection in the window of a torch.
However as the UFO rises into the clouds it becomes partially obscured.
I saw this and then read his comment, so I knew what he was talking
Problems with this being as claimed:
1. It goes into the clouds and includes being dimly visible so you would
need one material to block it and another to attenuate it's brightness.
2. You would need to move the torch with every wiggle of the camera because
it stays fixed in the background even
I am an open minded guy, I mean I'll look at something a bit skeptically but
will quickly accept wherever the weight of evidence leaves.
All of these oh no ...'s gonna get is are really without any good
evidence.
How so many people believe this crap is beyond me, it seems that to believe
it you
had 3 close friends
die.
And polio had not been a problem for years and never was, there is no reason
to believe it would have come back.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
John Berry wrote:
Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared
That is getting a bit too close to politics, I know because I wanted to make
a political reply regarding elections...
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:55 AM, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.comwrote:
From Ed Storms:
I could go on, but you can see that some really big lies,
along with many smaller
that.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
John Berry wrote:
There are a number of things I disagree with (including Spanish flu) but
the only one i can be bothered with is your claim that it always helps more
than it harms.
I did not say
I have not
read:
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html
No doubt many more exist on the subject.
Personally I'd rather talk about physics/energy/antigravity.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
John Berry wrote:
I didn't read the second post from you when
Yeah, but who says that talking to anyone will help, watch this about
someone calling Verizon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCJ3Oz5JVKs
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Steven Krivit
stev...@newenergytimes.comwrote:
So I called Comcast to fix a billing problem…and I got to hear Shaq and
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 9:14 PM, John Berry wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
wrote:
Sure, I have a view. If you feel the idea has merit I think you should
more fully
electromagnets a twist that their field strength suddenly grows.
So anyone know if this is genuinely verified experimentally?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:35 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 9:14 PM
it is to me
still quite comforting that there is a huge hole with an extraordinarily
promising answer either way (IMO).
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:21 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
I read the paper and indeed it hit on something I have puzzeled on, wanted
to know and may have even asked
of posting irrelevant material
on a thread and then calling out an individual to comment on it is less like
that of a compliment than it is like a troll.
On Jun 28, 2009, at 12:35 AM, John Berry wrote:
Not the intention.
Also trolling for what, an intelligent conversation on topic for the list
voltage that could maybe cancel the effect
out, also any negative inductance could be confused with some capacitance.
Ok, so maybe I can't answer it right now
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:48 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Horace, while I don't fully understand your FE generator on page
BTW all of this reminds me of an idea I had a very long time ago.Later
someone had the same idea (or stole mine) and put it here:
http://www.geocities.com/nayado/
http://www.geocities.com/nayado/The problem of Bill's spiraling current
not causing a magnetic field but the protons causing the field
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
Sure, I have a view. If you feel the idea has merit I think you should
more fully write up your idea, add any diagrams that might be relevant, and
include any formulas or computations you think are relevant, and post
A few thoughts, btw I have not fully comprehended everything you've said yet
but I'll have a crack at it...
From the stationary view point a magnetic dipole would be created only if
electron drift tended not to spiral.
The magnetic field would be generated by the rotating protons .vs non
spiraling
a torque on the individual
ball bearings?
Ah, maybe that's what you mean?
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:51 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
A few thoughts, btw I have not fully comprehended everything you've said
yet but I'll have a crack at it...
From the stationary view point a magnetic
I don't think this can be considered political as no one votes for the UN or
WHO and it's a health warning not a discussion or about political view
points.
Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to the
numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern especially as large
, John Berry wrote:
I don't think this can be considered political as no one votes for the UN
or WHO and it's a health warning not a discussion or about political view
points.
Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to the
numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:14 PM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, John Berry wrote:
From the stationary view point a magnetic dipole would be created only
if
electron drift tended not to spiral.
Then a simple spiral-shaped coil would not produce a magnetic
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:25 PM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, John Berry wrote:
After re-reading I still fail to understand your contact point thought,
but
is it merely to produce a magnetic field in the shaft?
A Faraday motor has a radial current in a disk
amounts of effort and genius and
risk do so for things that are kinda pointless like sports or climbing a
mountain.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
John Berry wrote:
Is it 20 v or 20v?
20 V (capital V).
Alexander Hollins wrote:
seriously, did
Again I didn't conceal or lie by omission.
I said from the start that there is more and there was.
My reasons for not giving it all at the start makes sense and was given.
Also no results were distorted you must have misunderstood me.
Rather a means for the electrons to do what was claimed was
I am going to make a more complete reply, but if the only things that
existed were things I had done then this world would be a lot smaller than
it is and many things people take foregranted would not exist.
But assuming I did do all of those things where would we be? Still no where
as there are 6
1: Teslas Radiant Receiver
I did not pick up on the fact that it was a positive charge that the plate
collected, the Barbat patent suggested otherwise and it seems I didn't
notice.
Never the less he does specify that a capacitor with unusually high quality
must be used.
Of course this does not
capacitor links
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 3:28 PM
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, John Berry
wrote:
If something interests you, then test it.
Don't worry Bill, me and John have been swapping ideas on the Hiddink
thing. I'm gonna rig up some tests tonight. Have some
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, John Berry wrote:
By finding a strong thread of correlation however can confirm even the
most
spotty evidence.
Here's the critical question.
Which experiments have you personally performed
One day I bet you'll be a hundredaire!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mcallister
kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.comwrote:
Finally we can buy GALINSTAN gallium-based liquid metal
from scitoys.com)
I'd buy some, but I am a multi-dollar industry.
--Kyle
Is it 20 v or 20v?
Anyway yeah the spurious resolution thing is annoying.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
While you folks are doing experiments in your kitchen, I am translating a
paper from Japanese in my office. From each according to his abilities
if some like to experiment or also connect the
dots and they tend to see things the way I do then I consider that
a reasonable bet especially when there is IMO a mountain of evidence.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:49 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
One day I bet you'll be a hundredaire!
On Thu
Be careful, they are more dangerous than neon sign transformers for
instance, you probably know that but...
That's a lot of HV diodes!
I appreciate your expectation that nothing will happen, it is better to
be pleasantly surprised than disappointed.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Kyle
I don't think this post is squarely directed at me or accusing me of such
but as it could be interpreted as an accusation I have replied as if it
were...
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:40 PM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Colin Quinney wrote:
I calculated that in an
at 7:27 PM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.comwrote:
Refs please.
Michel
2009/6/23 John Berry aethe...@gmail.com:
Given the evidence that both of these effects exist, both the electron
being
ejected and arcs creating excess energy...
no
scientific value of course, you can claim any impossible thing and get
a patent for it.
Michel
2009/6/23 John Berry aethe...@gmail.com:
The former will take more time, but the latter have already been given.
Stiffler replication | variant
JLN Patent replication | variant
Edwin Gray
/achieved is
a very effective way of closing of science from any progress it does not
wish to see made.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:21 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
No, you make a mistake.
You have followed the line of thought that some forms of evidence have
value and others don't
an energy balance correctly, plus they refuse to engage in a
scientific debate. They are either badly deluded amateurs, or crooks,
but you would have to be a scientist yourself to appreciate this.
Michel
2009/6/23 John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
Let me have another crack at that, I rushed
Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, John Berry wrote:
No it is not, there is plenty of evidence that it is not EM as an EM
pulse
can't become a static charge.
A mixture of GHz e-field and ion cloud would mimic an anomalous radiation
which can charge a surface. I suggest
2009, John Berry wrote:
I considered that and more but IMO that moves from the realm of
probability
to debunking..
Debunking is totally different than criticism. Debunkers try to stop
thought, stop experiments, and say we should drop this topic because
of X.
Critics on the other hand say
not like the guy makes everything
up.
Yes, something did seem a bit odd about the self powered version I agree
with you there.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:25 AM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, John Berry wrote:
in the general region as both Hiddink claimed
I could be wrong but I think everyone here would be well aware of the
relative comparison?
Thinking that pipes would needed to deliver the water would not be a mistake
made by most of the people who can find the US on a map I think.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jed Rothwell
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
John Berry wrote:
Thinking that pipes would needed to deliver the water would not be a
mistake made by most of the people who can find the US on a map I think.
I do not understand this statement.
- Jed
outright reject it without consideration.
If anyone is unclear how the various different devices all show the same
magnetic and current condition I will happily make an image that shows all
of them.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:09 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
That is fine then, as long
Slowly dying should not be expected to generate the effect.
The capacitance apparently increasing on the death of the plasma is curious.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Kyle Mcallister
kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.comwrote:
--- On Tue, 6/23/09, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle,
this makes sense, John's something decidedly more instant which
can easily make it through insulators is most probably a plasma
turnoff generated EM pulse.
Michel
2009/6/22 William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, John Berry wrote:
That was my initial objection also, I believe
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, John Berry wrote:
That was my initial objection also, I believe that *can* happen.
I also know that sometimes when a plasma is turned off the charges
(electrons anyway) can be propelled
I considered that and more but IMO that moves from the realm of probability
to debunking..
Given the evidence that both of these effects exist, both the electron being
ejected and arcs creating excess energy it would seem to me that something
should not be ruled out simply because some improbable
Indeed not much, but there is no reason to believe that it should be
insufficient as we know the capacitance wasn't going to be very high, I have
not yet established if it is less than might be expected however.
Well Ok let's charge the cap with a few KV and then see if this emission of
electrons
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:45 AM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
Assuming for a moment the plasma was actually holding excess
electrons, why wouldn't they just fly to the inside of the glass
envelope, which is of course positively charged,
Reposted and revised version of the introduction to this idea for those who
missed it.
I like to make correlations to pick threads of truth out of the noise.
I believe I have found one that IMO seems to give an almost complete and
certain engineerable Free Energy effect, I believe that unlike
It's not so much seeing a reason for it to occur as i tend not to either as
much as there is evidence that it DOES in fact occur when the conditions are
met.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:08:15 +0200:
Hi,
that is the only objection I find at all of interest.
2009/6/20 John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
Note: I replied to this initially believing I was replying to a list I
joined for the Gray conversion tube, so it's slanted in that direction.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Michel Jullian michelj
hmmm, that seems reasonable.
I wonder if a metal-metal version would have a similar capacitance?
I might get a multimeter, play with some foil and wire and try to see if
that capacitance is any below the metal-metal version.
At any rate that it has capacitance is good and means that IMO it's
Great sounding solution, yeah I don't read most either.
Hell, is it just me or are people less likely to respond to a personal email
these days? I have both sent them off with no reply and been guilty of not
replying in a timely manner and possibly forgetting to do so myself a few
times.
There
the arc which can be done with an autoignotion
coil, wait, didn't you already suggest something like that?
But is 12v enough to keep it open? Or is it too much?
hmmm
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:45 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
More links...
JLN Patent
http://www.google.com/patents?q=10
No, for that you need armchair types.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
The garage researcher can get into the act anytime. In fact, most of us at
the margins of the professional community, as you say, were garage men
initially. My only point was that
of a capacitor apart.
Indeed, but the work in this case is provided for by the collapsing plasma
which appears to be a free effect that we don't need to pay for.
Michel
2009/6/16 John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
The invention is based on Faraday's problem:
Two concentric metal spheres do
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 3:12 PM, John Berry wrote:
Well you could have just said true.
That would be nonsense since I strongly disagree with you on almost every
point you make.
I think you misunderstand me.
After
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
John Berry wrote:
I do not think a skilled amateur or professional can contribute anything to
cold fusion without access to a fully equipped profession grade laboratory
and hundreds of thousands of dollars
...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* John Berry
Jones, have you read my variable capacitor post, subject: On Topic in
any detail?
If so can I have your opinion on it? I think it was you that actually
identified the
patent co-invented by JLN?
Cannot comment on that now due to a contractual agreement
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Well Frank, such ideas have value only when they show why and how most
observed behaviors occur and how to make the behavior occur more
consistently and at higher levels. All theories I know about met only a
small
@eskimo.com
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 9:29 PM
V, and John Berry in particular,
Figured I should make a more aptly titled thread for
this,
as Enough Already doesn't make much sense in light
of what
we're talking about. :)
Yep had to look at that before reply.
I have all
]:Plasma capacitor
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 9:29 PM
V, and John Berry in particular,
Figured I should make a more aptly titled thread for
this,
as Enough Already doesn't make much sense in light
of what
we're talking about. :)
Yep had to look
The alternate list however would not kill the current Vortex, Ok I'd go
since I don't care for 99% but no one will miss me as I have tended to lurk
99% of the time.
THIS vortex will stay the same as it is essentially free of such content
anyway and this content will get a chance to perhaps grow,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:03 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I think you will find that there is a voltage rise, but not an energy
increase.
The reason for the voltage rise is that the capacitance is suddenly
reduced,
while the charge remains more or less constant. Any energy increase would
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/6/17 John Berry aethe...@gmail.com:
An additional thought.
I believe that one issue would be that such an experiment might well
become
deficient of the charge that is applied to the plasma.
Why should
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/6/17 John Berry aethe...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/6/17 John Berry aethe...@gmail.com:
An additional thought.
I believe that one
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:28 AM, John Berry wrote:
The alternate list however would not kill the current Vortex, Ok I'd go
since I don't care for 99% but no one will miss me as I have tended to lurk
99% of the time
, at 12:24 PM, John Berry wrote:
Just what *is* a viable standard? To what degree should content be
valued over courtesy? Just how anal do we have to become?
You are the only one being anal about it so far...
The term *anal-retentive* (or *anally retentive*, *anal retentive
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* John Berry
... on the contrary, this is probably the only board on the net (one of
the few, anyway), where there are enough open-minded scientists and serious
thinkers to give these subjects a measure of due
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
John Berry (he who signs not his name) wrote:
Cold Fusion is somewhat fringe, but as much respect as I have for Jed's
dedication I can not imagine either in a technological nor
political-business-economic way
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Kyle Mcallister
kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.comwrote:
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, though Gray has air and hence no inner tube between
the plasma and the metal terminal.
What is he using as plasma? Corona?
No, A channel
The invention is based on Faraday's problem:
Two concentric metal spheres do not touch and form a capcitor C.
That one is charged up to a potential V.
Then the outside sphere is removed.
The remaining sphere is a 1-terminal Capacitor c.
The potential on that sphere is momentarily C/c x V.
It is
3 lists, that would just be unmanageable.Better is a rule of thumb, politics
should be allowed as long as it is strictly on topic politics that isn't
causing a problem, otherwise as with any other off topic subject it ought to
go to B.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:42 AM, OrionWorks
3 lists, that would just be unmanageable.Better is a rule of thumb, politics
should be allowed as long as it is strictly on topic politics that isn't
causing a problem, otherwise as with any other off topic subject it ought to
go to B.
Not to mention the cost of running an extra list to Bill.
AGREED!
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
*Sorry, you are absolutely right. I suggest this is the way the list can
be handled without Bill having to get involved at all.*
Ed
On Jun 16, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Alexander Hollins wrote:
And at this
Good idea Ed.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
I suggest a public discussion stops when anyone objects. Following the
objection, anyone who wishes to continue the discussion privately can make
their wish known publicly. These people would be put on the
Hopefully though it is the end of this whole affair as it is about finding a
resolution.
It is still interesting how many are putting their energies into that.
I am afraid my specifically On Topic thread looks like it will die due to
inattention, version 1.0 died over at Overunity.com due to lack
beliefs but you aren't being asked to only
believe Hiddink.
I am happy to explain anything you may not get, though the idea is very
simple.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net wrote:
--
*From:* John Berry [mailto:aethe...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net wrote:
I am afraid my specifically On Topic thread looks like it will die due
to inattention, version 1.0 died over at Overunity.com due to lack of
general interest.
I think it got some attention. We just don’t know what to make
601 - 700 of 975 matches
Mail list logo
