Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

ivated his theory of SR. The line you quote brings them all together. Is it accurate? I don't know but it makes him appear very thorough. harry On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 3:05 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: says -> >>The aberration of

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

I should not have said "seems". It does more accurately predict the amount of stellar aberration. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_(astronomy) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_(astronomy)> harry On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:33 AM ROGER ANDERTON mail

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

>>>seems <<< ??? When contrasting a Newtonian calculation with an Einsteinian calculation - its usually not given. -- Original Message -- From: "H L V" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 15:18 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

Aether On 12.11.2023 12:59, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: I think there are aspects of QM that are rather well established, but much less so with SR. It seems to me that Quantum Physics is open to many different interpretations and really isn't dogmatic about which is true.<< QM I (SChrödigner)

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

I think there are aspects of QM that are rather well established, but much less so with SR. It seems to me that Quantum Physics is open to many different interpretations and really isn't dogmatic about which is true.<< Like Quantum physics - SR is open to different interpretations, but unli

Re: [Vo]:Re: Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

Jonathan You say: "So it really is amazing how big of a shambles it all is!" Yes, its a shambles. Part of the problem was pointed out by an early critic of relativity -> G. BURNISTON BROWN Bulletin of the Institute of Physics and Physical Society, Vol. 18 (March, 1967) pp.71—77 https://www

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

you give me the basics of what you cover, what the mistranslations ae and what else has been changed that I haven't mentioned above? A recap of sorts? On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 04:18, ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: my videos dealing with Einstein t

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

y has been misunderstood https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TiJZA-trjU -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 13:28 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether One-way and two-way speed of light wo

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

mentioning the one way speed of light, i would imagine if he went to the point of saying "one way speed of light" in german that would have been odd to drop the "one way" part. But will check out what the translation issue is, thanks. On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 23:13, RO

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

erous different interpretations - so people have different beliefs as to what it "is" Same as what happens to other religious texts (such as the Bible) - gets different translations -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, 9

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

but it is -- Original Message -- From: "Jonathan Berry" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 06:34 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether I doubt it's a translation issue. On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 22:24, ROGER ANDERTON &l

Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether

Part of the problem is - can translate Einstein's 1905 SR paper in different ways into English. In 1905 he doesn't mention one-way and two-way lightspeed. So, now in retrospect can try to impose on him what he should have meant using those terms. -- Original Message -- From: "Jonatha

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

quot; To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 14:33 Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li If there's any truth to the testimony before Congress, we already have the tech. On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 5:56 AM ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wr

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

Re: [Vo]:ChatGPT goes bonkers

Similar thing dealt with in this fiction tv series - Westworld https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westworld_(TV_series) where humans can go to an amusement park where there are androids/robots, where can abuse the androids in any way one likes - rape, kill etc - equivalent to a more advanced "se

Re: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year

here in the hands of the Ukrainians - they would already have been toast by now. Terry Blanton wrote: Regretfully, I agree. ROGER ANDERTON wrote: Ukraine was not supposed to have nukes by earlier agreements with Russia, hence Ukraine wanted to join NATO to get acces

RE: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year

-- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, 4 Jan, 23 At 00:41 Subject: RE: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year Ukraine was not supposed to have nukes by earlier agreements with Russia, hence Ukraine wanted to join NATO to get access to nukes - and tha

RE: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year

Ukraine was not supposed to have nukes by earlier agreements with Russia, hence Ukraine wanted to join NATO to get access to nukes - and that was seen as breaking agreements with Russia hence one of the reasons for Putin's invasion - i.e deemed Russia was provoked. If Ukraine secretly has nuk

Re: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year

minous New Year On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 6:25 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: You mean mercury sulfide? Supposedly exaggerated unfounded claims are made about it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_mercury <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_mercury>

Re: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year

- "they" are not telling us -- Original Message -- From: "Terry Blanton" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, 1 Jan, 23 At 03:52 Subject: Re: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year Right and they utilize Red Mercury. On Sat, Dec 31, 2022, 9:06 PM ROGER ANDERT

Re: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year

maybe Zelensky is using it to blackmail West to support him? -- Original Message -- From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" Sent: Sunday, 1 Jan, 23 At 01:39 Subject: Re: [Vo]:2023 -- An ominous New Year Yes I remember seeing some of this years ago. We have to remember that Ukr

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

n dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: I take it that the photo is not the best so doesn't show everything; and heat was so bad at one time that it spread a long way. You mean the heat magically jumped 70 feet, and then sprea

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

ay, 22 Jun, 22 At 23:38 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: So, you are not sure and only "think" and could be wrong. Well, pretty sure. I can always be wrong. (I suggest you practice saying that to you

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

typo correction -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 22:47 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone Jed: So I think it was an artifact of the photo. So, you are not sure and only "think"

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 22:26 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: It wasn't as massive a fire as you are trying to make out. I have read ab

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

typo correction -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 19:00 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone Jed I found reference to the documentary - https://www.buzzfeed.com/kristinharris/titanic-the-ne

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

have happened, just bad engineering. Silkwodd pointed out bad engineering at Atomic plant and that made her a martyr etc -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 18:17 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

f the best in the world. And they didn't think about building a bigger sea wall? etc -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 16:46 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <m

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

At 16:50 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Stigmergy (/ˈstɪɡmərdʒi/ <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/English> STIG-mər-jee <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Pronunciation_respelling_k

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

ou misunderstand definitions -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 16:56 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: definition

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

2 At 16:56 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: definition 2 to act in harmony toward a common end https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspire <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspir

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

t; To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 16:36 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: There are open conspiracies - That is a contradiction of terms. The dictionary definition of "c

RE: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

022 9:49 AM To: Vortex Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: This is getting too diverted. What you were saying sounded like a conspiracy theory. Perhaps it did sound like that, but it was not. Be

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

incompetent people at each stage of the process. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 15:16 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrot

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

://www.forcingchange.org/open-conspiracy/ -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 14:48 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: This

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

ethod, but when it comes down to what they actually do - its usually the opposite. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 01:59 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ande

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 01:26 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Please provide proof. You don't need me to do that. There are many authoritative sources on line, at

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

-- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Wednesday, 22 Jun, 22 At 00:49 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Some of the people who spread consp

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

Jed Rothwell wrote:Some of the people who spread conspiracy theories are themselves corrupt. Some work for the Russian government. Their purpose is to disrupt U.S. society and destroy our institutions. You should not trust everyone who tells you there is a criminal conspiracy. They may have u

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

://www.chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Myron_Evans.html -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Tuesday, 21 Jun, 22 At 16:37 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: I think

RE: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

its cancel culture at work. an - Einstein is wrong video I was watching has disappeared -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpWq_gw31ao I think a lot of things are going to disappear. It used to be - Web was open to all ideas; now its about censoring -- Original Message -- Fr

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

Internet search algorithms have been changed; because protests were made that algorithms were creating echo chambers. In discussions of news media , an echo chamber refers to situations in which beliefs are amplified or reinforced by communication

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

Internet censorship does occur, dealt with by wiki at - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship if conspiracy then openly admitted conspiracy -- Original Message -- From: "Nicholas Palmer" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, 18 Jun, 22 At 02:06 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

AI being used to remove fake news -> How AI can Remove Fake News https://bywire.news/articles/how-ai-can-remove-fake-news -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, 13 Jun, 22 At 21:54 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and chen

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

information is being purged from internet as part of the political campaign to delete fake news -- Original Message -- From: "Esa Ruoho" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, 13 Jun, 22 At 17:17 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone Not only that but seems like http://e

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated emission and Pre-Quantum Physics

"There's still a good bit of unfinished business with certain 18th-century breakthroughs that've languished.." That is correct. Physics students are misinformed by the physics establishment about physics history, especially missing out most of stuff in 18th century. -- Original Messa

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated emission and Pre-Quantum Physics

/youtu.be/w1vi0yk7BvU?t=248 <https://youtu.be/w1vi0yk7BvU?t=248> harry On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 8:28 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Also (i) Boscovich theory led to Quantum theory -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1vi0yk7BvU <https

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated emission and Pre-Quantum Physics

Also (i) Boscovich theory led to Quantum theory -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1vi0yk7BvU (ii) Einstein working from Boscovich theory -> https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2197/1/012002/meta So progression from 18th century theory of Boscovich to modern physics ---

Re: [Vo]:This smells like an April 1 joke

well the link to place an advance order -> doesn't go to that so, therefore infer joke -- Original Message -- From: "Jones Beene" To: "vortex" Sent: Saturday, 2 Apr, 22 At 02:36 Subject: [Vo]:This smells like an April 1 joke https://www.whichev.net/2022/04/01/elon-musk-announces-te

Re: [Vo]:mRNA Vaccine Reverse Transcribed into Liver DNA

----- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, 14 Mar, 22 At 07:17 Subject: Re: [Vo]:mRNA Vaccine Reverse Transcribed into Liver DNA serves us all to follow the government's recommendations. << can't trust governments when run by satanists

Re: [Vo]:mRNA Vaccine Reverse Transcribed into Liver DNA

serves us all to follow the government's recommendations. << can't trust governments when run by satanists -- Original Message -- From: "CB Sites" To: "vortex-l" Sent: Monday, 14 Mar, 22 At 03:22 Subject: Re: [Vo]:mRNA Vaccine Reverse Transcribed into Liver DNA Your right. We sh

Re: [Vo]:$2 million prize for simple/reproducible LENR experiment

"ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, 1 Mar, 22 At 01:35 Subject: Re: [Vo]:$2 million prize for simple/reproducible LENR experiment i.e. Einstein wrong about gravity etc. -- Original Message ------ From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent

Re: [Vo]:$2 million prize for simple/reproducible LENR experiment

i.e. Einstein wrong about gravity etc. -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, 1 Mar, 22 At 01:33 Subject: Re: [Vo]:$2 million prize for simple/reproducible LENR experiment How about an antigravity effect -> wou

Re: [Vo]:$2 million prize for simple/reproducible LENR experiment

How about an antigravity effect -> would that count? According to Einstein -> if heat metal (and if no chemical reactions going on) then the weight of the metal increases; but that doesn't happen and instead the metal decreases in weight - i.e. antigravity explained at -> https://www.yout

Re: [Vo]:Asked & Answered

.This doesn't happen in any other area of science.<< I point out in my videos -> moving goalposts happens all the time in Einstein's relativity -> relativists claim one thing one moment and move goalposts and claim something different later. Special Relativity moving goalposts - the clo

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

May be an image of 5 people and text that says more deletions to follow -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 23:52 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouT

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

onday, 20 Sep, 21 At 23:19 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads Just så the Said in germany in the 1930is. Government can do as they want. The government wants our best. On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 13:09 Jed Rothwell <mailto:jedrothw.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

I disagree, it is fascism when corporations and government are in partnership. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 18:09 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ishers for the benefit of the public since colonial times.<< myth -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:29 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads R

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Emails https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGvRzwdnnM0 -- Original Message ------ From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:10 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads government and big tech

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

is that free? -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:10 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> >

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

tolerate until kill it https://awareity.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/temp_frogs.png -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:51 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

they hooked me -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:56 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> >

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

more things have to pay for all adds up -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:40 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

wiki says -> YouTube is an American online video sharing and social media platform owned by Google . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube so is a pl

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

21 At 14:46 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: It is not their constitutional right to censor. It most certainly is their right! Facebook or the Washington Post

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Then "they" can up the price. Point is -> used to be free; so tried to get people hooked on something that was free and then fleece them. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 14:50 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

---- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 19:14 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with big tech to censor --> T

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

not allowed to censor and big tech allowed to censor is nonsense, when government and big tech are the same thing. -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 18:51 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

It is not their constitutional right to censor. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads AM ROGER ANDERTON <m

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

s for "dangerous" -> as per Manhattan project -> parts of physics is deemed "dangerous" and has to be censored. -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 02:03 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

te-all-proven-correct.html etc. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 01:47 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Not really new, its the same old trick everytime; its like how illegal drugs are pushed -> the dealer gives you them free until you are hooked then you ha

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

uot; without YouTube ads Oh. You learn something new every day. I see you can pay them to delete the ads for $12 a month, with YouTube Premium. This I did not know, because I am out of it. Far, far out of it. Light years away from it. - Jed On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:12 PM ROGER ANDERTON

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Youtube has started putting adverts on all videos now; they should have sent you a message telling you what they were going to do; maybe its in your spam folder. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: c...@googlegroups.com; "Vortex" Sent: Friday, 17 Sep, 21 At 19:12 Subject

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers

the message I get is -> no access to that site from Europe due to EU (European Union) Laws -- Original Message -- From: "Terry Blanton" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, 9 Sep, 21 At 16:19 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers Unintended consequences https://www.wfla.com/communi

[Vo]:vacuum drop tower

Hi Does anyone here have access to a vacuum drop tower; I want to do an antigravity experiment

Re: [Vo]: uap report out

I think -> most people in general (especially many scientists) are afraid of the idea of ETs. ET signals can easily be picked up using Tesla technology but SETI just ignores them. As my friend Peter Cheasley found out-> Argonaut Peter Cheasley, VE2TPR, sends along this 3.5 GHz detection from

[Vo]:Special relativity: the pedagogical trick

Special relativity: the pedagogical trick Special relativity has been misunderstood by the mainstream physics community, and physics students have been taught wrong!Physicist Don Lincoln effectively is telling us that the Great Richard Feynman didn't understand relativity. But what Richard Fe

RE: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

Well, aliens supposedly refer to people as containers for souls Robert Lazar mentioned a book that contained the history of earth and that it said that humans were referred to as ..containers for souls" and that souls could be traded in something like a barter system. The aliens are doing it

Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

Probably Social Darwnists -> where think they can do whatever they like to inferior species -- Original Message -- From: "Terry Blanton" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, 20 May, 21 At 23:53 Subject: Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month On Thu, May

Re: [Vo]:planetary formation

1) If both the Sun and the planets formed from the same gas/dust cloud, how come the Sun is mostly Hydrogen and the Earth is a rocky planet?<< one theory/hypothesis/speculation is that there were supermassive stars (that have lived out their lives and died) in early universe where the heavi

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

ity to make a prediction about stellar aberration it has to use a definite one way speed of light because stellar aberration only involves light moving one way. This seems to be inconsistent. Harry On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 4:45 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wr

[Vo]:Moving goalposts

Latest video: Moving goalposts: Einstein's 1905 clock mistake Historical documents are treated as cannot be modified, and so Einstein's papers keep getting reprinted without correction to their mistakes, and without notes on them saying they are in error. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaU

Re: [Vo]:superluminal mind

ances. Harry On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:39 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: development of Boscovich theory led to quantum physics, Dragoslav from Serbia talk on Boscovich-> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1vi0yk7BvU <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1vi0yk7BvU>

RE: [Vo]:superluminal mind

Slobodan Nedic<< also deals with Boscovich theory. People like Tesla and Boscovich get missed out of Western Science education Boscovich 18 th century and used to be part of physics education before WWII then gets missed out. Boscovich statute-> Ruggiero Boscovich - Jesuits Ireland d

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

t: Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory Ok I watched it. Are you arguing that if Einstein were alive today he would say that it is possible to measure the one way speed of light. Harry On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:35 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: now pu

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

now published video on Youtube: "cannot measure one way lightspeed" deals with mistranslation of Einstein's paper, relativists moving goalposts etc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC9P644TXzY&feature=youtu.be -- Original Message -- From: "ROGER ANDERTON&q

Re: [Vo]:Buster Keaton and the Michelson Morley experiment

Well one of the things that has confused me when taught relativity is- if have length contraction of an object in one direction and not perpendicular to that direction; then surely its getting denser along the contracted length and then increase gravitational force in the perpendicular direct

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

because they fear others will think less of them.<< People disagree about math -- Original Message -- From: "H LV" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, 8 Dec, 20 At 19:14 Subject: Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:31 PM ROG

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

was an update, making that spacetime curved to give GR was another update. Roger -- Original Message -- From: "H LV" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, 8 Dec, 20 At 15:47 Subject: Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:27 AM ROGER ANDERT

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

speed of emission from a source is always c with respect to the aether regardless of the motion of the source through the aether. However that would have consequences in terms of conservation of momentum which would need to be examined. Harry On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 3:55 PM ROGER ANDERTON

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

s to learn about the history of physics. Harry On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 3:55 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: That's anyone way of putting it. But memes like -> "emission theory makes wrong predictions in other domains" give the fa

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

those other domains. harry On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 1:51 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: Good animation. emission theory DOES NOT makes wrong prediction in other domains. What probably really talking about is misapplying emission theory in other

Re: [Vo]:animation of emission theory

Good animation. emission theory DOES NOT makes wrong prediction in other domains. What probably really talking about is misapplying emission theory in other domains the claim "emission theory makes wrong predictions in other domains" is just a meme promoting a falsehood It is an example

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

latory motion. The only thing it experiences is a continual change of location wrt to the aether frame. Harry On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:38 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: It's wave-particle duality; so have a particle model and wave model for photon

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

light. However, while the measured velocity of light could decrease or increase in the moving frame, I still think the rules should ensure that the velocity of light of wrt to the aether does not change. harry On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:21 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com>

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

y just forward motion. (These additive and subtractive rules ensure that the speed of light wrt to the aether frame is always C.) Harry On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: The problem with "aether" is that there are lots o

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

l have to explain the null result and all other apparent confirmations of relativity theory. Harry On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 11:05 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: fudging math is standard part of science/physics Einstein's work not even properly t

Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy

a reversal from how it was in Einstein's day and for most of the 20th century. Harry On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 11:05 AM ROGER ANDERTON mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote: fudging math is standard part of science/physics Einstein's work not even properly translate

  1   2   >