disappear, he is currently little more than a LENR
saboteur.
On 10 September 2012 15:14, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
And any trust that may have been re-established in Rossi is now totally
destroyed.
No one in his right mind would
were there. And we know
that Rossi has lied on many other occasions too (eg shipment of 1MW unit).
Totally massively untrustworthy.
On 10 September 2012 15:58, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
To what faked results are you referring exactly?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Robert Lynn
reading about the thermal camera:
http://www.optris.com/thermal-imager-pi160?file=tl_files/pdf/Downloads/Infrared%20Cameras/PI_Brochure.pdf
http://www.optris.com/thermal-imager-pi160?file=tl_files/pdf/Downloads/IR-Basics.pdf
Has stated accuracy of +/- 2% which at typical 1000K of Rossi's
Also I note that there is no neutron detection in the radiation measurements
On 9 September 2012 10:29, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.comwrote:
reading about the thermal camera:
http://www.optris.com/thermal-imager-pi160?file=tl_files/pdf/Downloads/Infrared%20Cameras/PI_Brochure.pdf
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/09/high-temperature-e-cat-report-published/
No glaring problems. Though for the life of me I can't work out where the
reactor is in the arrangement - they detail the outer and inner tubes
(which are not the reactors, their mass is consistent with dense 310 SS,
Just realised, if top of reactor was significantly cooler than bottom then
all power calculations would be bollocks. Were there checks done on this
and could the internals have allowed such an uneven heat distribution?
From current results 4-5 times the number of wires (=60-75W) should just
about be self-sustaining, and should probably not run-away.
On 22 August 2012 08:11, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Someone suggested that Celani's device could not handle a much higher
temperature than it
Just how hard would it be to detect if Deuterium is the product in Ni-H
LENR?
I don't have good data on P-P=D fusion, but based on mass difference it
releases about 2.31e-13J/deuteron formed. Assuming that to really produce
a strong Deuterium signal in needs to double in concentration from about
translations:
To err is human, to knowingly persist in error is diabolical.
The mountains will be in labor, and a ridiculous mouse will be brought forth
very apt.
On 20 August 2012 20:23, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking this paper with very mixed feelinga.
Admiration
Is there any way to guesstimate – assuming the best reasonable kind of
insulation is added to retain heat, something like aerogel, etc – how much
more mass of active wire (if any) would be necessary to get close to a
nominally self-sustaining system?
** **
Jones
That would be
Our IC engine testing euphemism for fires and explosions was a thermal
event
On 18 August 2012 14:49, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:40 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Fast Recomb?
Fast recombination of the H2 and O2 back into water and heat.
Neutrons are hard to shield and when absorbed can produce radioactive
materials. Could this be a potentially killer blow to otherwise safe LENR?
Fission reactors typically create up to 10^13 neutrons per cm² per second,
and this experiment was only making about 20 per s, over (I assume) the
From those numbers (30°C room, 120°C at 48W and 140°C when LENR active) I
calculate 16W excess if you assume all radiative heat transfer. But it
will actually be slightly less than that because the hotter tube surface
will convect heat away at a rate that is roughly proportional to the air to
Quick look through. A variety of materials tried with hydrogen and
deuterium. Best results 1-2W per gram of Ni35-Cu8-Zr57 and Hydrogen, at
573K (300°C) running for weeks quite happily. They found adding Cu to NiZr
made it work much better. They are getting far better results than they
get
And another in the economist (in the middle of an 8 minute audio from
Babbage Column prefaced by a discussion on walled gardens), 3:40 on. Very
negative and critical, and probably rather embarrassing to the columnists
in a few months time.
Probably the most sensible solution is that the atmosphere was
significantly thicker. 30% less heat input would drop the earth's
temperature by about 20°C, but 20% more mass of air would increase the
temperature by about 20°C at ground level. We know that during the age of
the dinosaurs that
Wire diameter 0.2mm, 1000mm long gives 0.031cm³, or about 500W/cm³, you
were off by a factor of about 1000. It is likely that not the whole
thickness is active, and this is only early days in development, not even
running at high temperature yet.
On 15 August 2012 02:23, Daniel Rocha
Argh, I meant a factor of 100 (never a good look to cock up your own
arithmetic when correcting someone)
On 15 August 2012 02:32, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Wire diameter 0.2mm, 1000mm long gives 0.031cm³, or about 500W/cm³, you
were off by a factor of about 1000
that
count (in terms of the heat energy from the inner tube).
On 11 August 2012 03:52, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
A technical analysis at last!
On 2012-08-11 04:05, Robert Lynn wrote:
Looks like Rossi has invented a tube furnace,or bought one and coated
So, he's a NATO Colonel, a Professor, an engineer the secret customer (used to
certify the 1 MW device), and has a history with Rossi during the PetrolDragon
affair?
ecat builder ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the google translation... I think this is terrible news.. Since
Fioravanti
Looks like Rossi has invented a tube furnace,or bought one and coated it in
a refractory.
Not a very convincing picture. No visible connections for gas or other
fluids, no temperature sensors, just a couple of electrical supplies.
Typically shoddy Rossi work, and again I ask myself is this
Very nice.
Most interesting 5:50 that power output increased with lower pressure
(about 4bar H2 better than 8bar)
Has anyone managed to find the report that has all of this data in it (saw
page 40 on one of the pages he was talking about)
On 9 August 2012 14:58, Akira Shirakawa
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/download/file.php?id=23
As with Rossi still no 3rd party validation but lots of very interesting
information:
As many have speculated Defkalion are using a plasma source of quite high
power, 24kV, 22mA at several kHz (automotive level performance), TZM
On 9 August 2012 18:01, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-08-09 18:55, Robert Lynn wrote:
Most interesting 5:50 that power output increased with lower pressure
(about 4bar H2 better than 8bar)
I wondering it wasn't the decrease in pressure which caused an increase
Hadn't noticed but Akira linked to Celani's report above.
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/PresICCF17_NewA3A.pdf
Excellent level of detail, including exact alloy used (isotan44, a constant
electrical resistivity alloy) should allow for many replication attempts -
and just one flawless public
Nice to see some positive results coming in from someone who is prepared to
share their results. Any word on temperature of reaction?
On 7 August 2012 09:55, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello group,
This new blogpost by Steven Krivit is certainly worth a read. It's about
Oh good grief. This is a forum for the discussion of science, not the
fantastical belief systems of illiterate, misogynistic, homophobic,
xenophobic, genocidal and religiously intolerant subsistence farmers whose
ill-founded opinions on matters scientific, moral and ethical are almost
entirely
a 1°C increase in the earth's temperature increases the energy radiated
away by about 1.5%. Using your 6000:1 figure for current human energy
releases we could increase our energy consumption by about 100 times (ie
1/60th of suns input energy) and only increase the Earths temperature by
1°C on
No
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_Law_of_Headlines
On 2 August 2012 12:40, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=2000category=Environment
Is There A Large Pyramid Underground Between
Mt. McKinley and Nome, Alaska?
Worried about sea level rise? Just pump seawater up into the middle of
Antartica, it will freeze and reduce sea level and no need to
desalinate. The central Arctic never gets warm enough for ice to melt, at
best it sublimes (like Greenland apart from a surface melting about every
150 years, one
Nano-scaled powders melt at temperatures up to hundred degrees below
the melting point of the bulk material.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melting-point_depression
That may also apply to small surface features.
On 24 July 2012 03:10, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Properties: The
The true test is how many parts remain on the bench after reassembly.
On 20 July 2012 14:52, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
From Abd,
...
When I was a kid, I took lots of things apart and looked at how
they were put together. Sometimes I even managed to put
Always fascinates me that liberal is a pejorative in US when elsewhere in
the world it describes people who champion personal freedom from invasive
rules and laws - which in most peoples eyes is a good thing. Is this a
semantic shift or conflation manufactured by the religious right or was it
The pumps will be multistage and intercooled to reduce compression costs,
the temperature will never get that high.
With that size pipe and pressure I can see why pipe breaks are so
devastating.
On 17 July 2012 20:29, David Jonsson davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com wrote:
Nord Stream is 1200 km
In a Mike McKubre presentation at SRI a year or so ago he described a
series of experiments in P-D where they measured and correlated Helium
production with excess heat and (if I recall correctly) got a result very
close to the expected heat release from D-D=He and He concentrations that
increased
plug that is visible has turned various
colors, also the look of high temperature operation.
Robert Dorr
At 01:44 PM 7/15/2012, you wrote:
Sorry for the double post and a correction, I said the part was Ford
Motorcraft Number SP-509, but it should be Ford Motorcraft Number SP-507.
Robert Dorr
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/16/e_cat_opens_australian_web_shopfront/
I would need a lot of convincing that they were on the up-and-up before
giving them any of my money.
Motorcraft Number SP-509. They are almost the same,
short of a body that is not quite threaded all the way to the tip.
Anyway I have to say that it most certainly a spark plug and not a glow plug.
Robert Dorr
At 12:44 PM 7/15/2012, you wrote:
I supposed DGT can replace spark plug for glow plugs
Motorcraft Number SP-509. They are almost the same,
short of a body that is not quite threaded all the way to the tip.
Anyway I have to say that it most certainly a spark plug and not a glow plug.
Robert Dorr
At 12:44 PM 7/15/2012, you wrote:
I supposed DGT can replace spark plug for glow plugs
Sorry for the double post and a correction, I said the part was Ford
Motorcraft Number SP-509, but it should be Ford Motorcraft Number SP-507.
Robert Dorr
In discussing Rossi's prey, it may be germaine to look back at this
statement, from a PetrolDragon contemporary, in The Magic of Mr. Rossi:
Acerbi: “In the years where he was working here, he didn’t produce a single
drop of oil, as far as we know. What he did was creating just a media event. He
Maybe it will work out, but only with subsidies of some sort. To me and
most others who have looked hard at this idea in the past it is a publicity
exercise lacking a sound economic basis. (I have been involved in
analysing sailing ships professionally, and have another friends who worked
on
So perhaps what we need is Poo-Roombas http://www.irobot.com/uk/ on every
farm? Or train dogs to collect crap (they seem to like eating the stuff
well enough) rather than using children as is common in the 3rd world.
It's probably cheaper and easier to dry and burn the excrement to create
energy
controlled airfoils:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbosail
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Free Shipping
From: Robert Lynn
Recently-analyzed data from BaBar, a high-energy physics experiment based at
the US Department of Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, show that a
particular type of particle decay called 'B to D-star-tau-nu' happens more
often than the Standard Model says it should
Church of England (or possibly Conservation of Energy)
On 18 June 2012 17:10, Harvey Norris harv...@yahoo.com wrote:
What does CoE stand for, I guess it means in a closed system? Thy symbols
dont match the words very well, so I cant find the meaning
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal
There is no technical reason why CSP cannot become competitive with other
technologies, especially if you factor in the cost in lives, health, and
global warming from the alternatives such as coal and natural gas from
fracking. Of course it is not competitive now. If I had a cold fusion
1/ The power source is too diffuse, and the sun doesn't shine at night
meaning you need a huge plant to produce significant power.
This is 110 MW on 1,600 acres. That is excellent power density. Better
than uranium fission or coal, when you take into account the land needed
for the mines
thorium fuel cycle is to use hot fusion is some
way in a hybrid to eliminate the need for uranium235 and plutonium. But the
LFTR advocates say that fusion is not viable.
So currently a LFTR with a PURE thorium fuel cycle is a fantasy.
Cheers: Axil
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Robert Lynn
I was involved in a CSP project a few years back, and as much as I enjoyed
the tech side of it I have to agree with you. Large scale CSP is probably
cheaper than large scale PV, but after you factor in maintenance, fighting
BANANAs ( Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything) and
Hi Vortex,
I was wondering what might be the best way to try transmuting bismuth
into radioactive polonium. I was thinking something along the lines of
taking some bismuth powder, loading it with pressurised deuterium or
hydrogen gas that had been sparked with a spark plug for a while.. any
I'm sorry, but as an engineer if you imagine that you can build a fusion
powered spacecraft with an exhaust velocity of 7.5e6m/s and 40MW of engine
power per kg of spacecraft (from rocket equation with 20% fuel use in 2
days at 1g thrust), when nobody can yet build a viable self sustaining
fusion
be possible for a spacecraft to achieve 1% of
the power and acceleration levels you suggest at an Isp of 7.5e6m/s, but I
wouldn't bet on it.
On 6 June 2012 21:31, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:55:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
You don't understand the nature
are simply too high.
On 6 June 2012 23:22, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 22:49:45 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
That is a luxury you do not have
with fusion in an ultra-high Isp engine.
It is also a luxury you don't need.
The trick is to perform
I used a pair of binoculars to project the image of the transit on to a dark
surface. With a bit of eyepiece-focusing, the transit was quite clear.
I think that the Venus blemish may be too small to be coherent with a simple
pinhole.
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be interested
Check out he pashen discharge curves:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paschen_Curves.PNG
and you will see that spark length is heavily dependent on the gas
composition and pressure. higher pressure means shorter spark at same
voltage, you won't get a 12mm spark in high pressure H2
Discharging
: Axil
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out he pashen discharge curves:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paschen_Curves.PNG
and you will see that spark length is heavily dependent on the gas
composition and pressure. higher
As I understand it Blacklight has an exceptionally high Promises:Products
ratio over the first 20 years of their existence, and have burned through
an enormous amount of money from investors (no doubt hurting a fair number
of people and careers for those that believed in them). Does this latest
On the contrary, Heinz may love the idea. The faster the ketchup escapes, the
more likely you are to overpour. When that occurs, the 66 servings per bottle
become, in practice, substantially fewer. This means the bottle will need
replaced more frequently, and Heinz sells more ketchup.
Date:
: [Vo]:Robert Moog- Synthesizer Birthday 78- Google -Player On-line
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 08:40:10 -0400
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
And Macs.
On May 23, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Ron Kita wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L,
Too Col, http://www.google.com has a Moog that you can play on their
website.
I
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding
So, arcing in a hydrogen environment produces monoatomic hydrogen from diatomic
hydrogen, eh?
From: jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:29:59 +0800
Seems to me that Woomera
Checking on use of spark plugs with high pressure hydrogen:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschen%27s_law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paschen_Curves.PNG
Hydrogen appears to have a lower breakdown voltage of about 60-70% of
air at same pressure. So should be able to use an air gap that is
Interesting, the guy that is starting this Open Source Project is
named Gary Wright from Las Vegas. The guy that turned in Rossi in
Florida for building nuclear reactors was also named Gary Wright from
Las Vegas. A coincidence?
Robert Dorr
At 08:44 AM 5/18/2012, you wrote:
I should add
Japanese are importing massive amounts of LNG to compensate. The Asian LNG
price has spiked to almost 4x US and 2x European price in last year based
mostly on increased Japanese demand but it should come down over next
couple of years as the market adapts (more LNG plants and Ships will be
built).
Meh, I think the real reason it was never sold is it just wasn't that
special. There is a very low probability that it would have been a product
that would have been commercially competitive with existing thermal
protection materials (from either cost or performance point of view).
For the high
They were 400 years late to the party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wan_Hu
On 16 May 2012 12:31, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Did the first manned rocket launch in 1961 carrying Yuri Gagarin? Or
did it launch in 1933 carrying Otto Fischer?
Perhaps the deputy minister of snakes and clowns?
I've totally lost interest in Rossi says. Too many lies, evasions and
misdirections and even 7 months after the October 2011 demo (that he
claimed was a commercial product he would deliver to a customer until he
was caught out) he is still doing
Seems Italian Govt doesn't have any better info than we do, but they have
taken the time to look at it, and see the obvious flaws in Rossi's visible
efforts.
On 13 May 2012 23:20, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
In
Noticed that too. Very heavy on marketing, very light on development which
considering how big a deal the first successful commercial LENR development
would is as a technology would be very short sighted.
Being charitable maybe they already have a large technical staff, or maybe
they plan on
Interesting, P21, 22 are key page for me. But having looked at it for a
few minutes it doesn't appear that they are getting particularly good
results (though admittedly it is hard to figure what we are looking at and
who knows if these are their best results).
P21 Power output seems to be
Spark plugs make for easily removable/modifiable, cheap and easy high
voltage, high current and high temperature electrical feed-throughs into
pressure or vacuum vessels. I don't think you can read to much into their
use.
At 04:42 PM 5/10/2012, ecat builder wrote:
Wow. That is a spark plug on
Is this parody? The GGE website still appears to be solely SunCube-centric.
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 05:19:53 -0700
From: gowatso...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Cool Fusion launch in Adelaide
Hi Guys
Green and Gold Energy is proud to announce the launch of our CoolCat ™
I've listened to a little of it so far (Valerio Ciampoli of NichEnergy on
behalf of Piantelli at University of Sienna) they are getting very good
results and releasing some excellent data. Most of the slides have been
seen before, but good to have a commentary for it.
Before long, the New York Times will be but a room of servers. The editors will
be relegated to choosing computer-generated stories from those most
recommended for their target demographic. At least they'll have fewer typos.
The the 618°C temperature that you quote for the RR300 is MGT
(measured gas temperature) which is actually the turbine outlet
temperature. As such it will be 2-300° C below the Turbine inlet
temperature. Small gas turbines like the RR300 with uncooled turbine
blades have turbine inlet
A quick reading and first impressions:
1/ It appears then that they are using 100's of Watt input from a rectified
Variac. Though actual power input is only hinted at with Variac Range of
60-240V and 0.3-9A input, (spanning 20-2160W), though later on they mention
120-160V and as little as 0.3A
While Brillouin seems well founded, disciplined and scientific it does
appear that they have a pretty major problem in that their COP at 2.1
is too low to be commercially useful. I believe they achieved that
almost a year ago if the info on their website is anything to go by,
and yet in their
[mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
*Sent:* Monday, April 23, 2012 7:10 AM
... The main one is silane – which is a molecule like methane but with
silicon at the core instead of carbon. Robert Zurbin suggest this in “The
Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must” and NASA
has picked up
The larger wind turbines run into a wall with scaling of volume ³ (=mass
and cost) vs swept area ² with increasing rotor diameter, so that the
economics probably start to get worse at sizes beyond those already in use
(apart from perhaps reducing maintenance costs). Makani
Thanks Akira. Very interesting, though many of the slides lack
explanations and I think we have seen some of it before.It is still
wonderful to see some real data and very positive looking results (20W
input 20+71=91W output at 260°C). So a gain of about 4.5. That is enough
(just barely) to
It looks like a sad puppy.
Robert Dorr
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/atmoney/news/20120411-OYT1T01265.htm
- Jed
It's appallingly ugly! :(
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
research, we should be
concentrating on developing cheaper options using available
technology.
On 11 April 2012 23:43, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
A space-elevator must climb about 4km, even at 200km/hr that will
take more than
Space elevators for earth are probably unworkable, though they could
be pretty good for Mars (from Phobos) and maybe for the moon.
A space-elevator must climb about 4km, even at 200km/hr that will
take more than a week and requires a huge amount of power to be
supplied to the climber. That
No chance. Requires massive budget, and technology that isn't yet
available. Electromagnetic catapults have never achieved the high
velocities required, not to mention the mega-engineering to create a
track 100's of km long that is levitated 20km above the earth by a
huge magnetic field, and yet
Flying cars can eliminate the need for cities, and many of the problems
that cities create:
-crime and other social problems arising from lack of community
-hugely expensive housing driven by high land prices
-wasted lives commuting
-environmental issues from high population densities
-expensive
Short of using a LENR type device on board a drone, my guess is they
would use Americium 241 in an Alpha-Voltaic configuration.
At 02:24 PM 4/4/2012, you wrote:
Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.comjanap...@gmail.com wrote:
This huge cost for a nuclear heat source no matter which one they
A nice article on LENR progress providing only broad strokes, but a few
recent links:
http://cleantechauthority.com/lenr-finally-getting-traction/
It's worth a recap of recent news, I think. CERN, MIT and NASA discussions
were promising, but there has been a lack of news on the development
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:05:48 -0500, James Bowery wrote:
So what do you guys think?
Why has Brillouin such difficulties to collect 6 million?
Maybe the vortex-crowd should put their money where their mouth is,
and invest.
(suppressing my Homerian laughter.)
As long as LENR can't be patented
suggested by
the speaker but I realize that he had no way of knowing that this resource
would come into being.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Apr 1, 2012 8:08 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:There is no tomorrow
It will be horrendously expensive, but I would like to think that as smart
as the Japanese are, they will come up with some creative solutions to
mitigate the cost - and maybe ultimately it won't be as expensive as
currently imagined. My parents told me that when they visited Nagasaki
and
Maybe the best long term answer for nuclear is to put reactors in large
barges or on platforms 10's-100's of miles off-shore. While they would be
more vulnerable to the elements they would not threaten any land.
Very well presented. The first half should be looked at by all
politicians responsible for implementing the long term plans required
to maintain our standard of living. But I disagree with the ultimate
conclusions. All the problems presented including mineral, and water
shortages (possible
Global warming has become an extremely polarising issue. There are
strong science based arguments on both sides but whichever side you
believe is to some extent a 'faith based' judgement as you can find
contradictory journal papers and analyses on almost every issue (other
than the actual general
The updated Brillouin hypothesis for how the reaction works,
interesting reading. Note that they do comment on the reaction
reaching a run-away state when the lattice is heavily loaded that
overwhelms the local capacity to absorb the energy and results in the
release of some neutrons and x-rays -
Looks like a stealthy UAV of some sort, accompanied by the sound of an
engine. That round patch in the underside could be a radar (like
AWACS) or a lift fan such as used by
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_Aeronautics_X-Hawk
There is a huge amount of military RD work done in the middle of
Oh dear, Joe Romm again torturing the numbers until they confess.
That graph employs the most advantageous manipulation available (a 10
year running average) to hide the fact that if you fit a line through
the recent temperature record you have to go back more than a decade
to show any warming
Besides page 4, it is also missing pages 1,2 and 28 (Figure 9).
Robert Dorr
An important paper, relative to Ni-H which is on the LENR archive site:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GernertNnascenthyd.pdf
has a page missing - page 4 - and it could be important.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:10:20 -0500, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
See:
http://energycatalyzer3.com/news/rossi-loses-major-supporter-lets-reporter-into-his-home
For some time now it would appear that Sterling has been showing more
support of DGT's efforts as compared to Rossi's.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2012/Report5-Rossis-Profitable-Career-in-Science.shtml
New Energy Times attempts to demonstrate the profitability of the alleged
investment scheme.
//Excerpt of note:
Energy Catalyzer Patent Applications - Italian Deadline Approaches
A deadline is
Speed increases as the satellite orbits closer to its parent, and slows as the
orbit is extended. As the x-axis is a linear representation of time, the
changes in speed during orbit serve to compress the wave troughs and expand
the wave peaks. Thus the wave resembles more of a bouncing ball
201 - 300 of 697 matches
Mail list logo
