Usually if it completely fails, it's faulty telco equip. Their stuff can
freak out (if it's faulty) if it see's all ones (has to do with the 12.5%
rule in B8ZS), all zero's (same principal) 4040 is a test pattern the telco
sends out. ABCD is another test pattern.
The fact
I didn't see the output of the int and service mod. You got major timing
issues with the clock on the line. That's your problem. Have them check
it and make sure you have the correct number of channels. Is it a Full T?
Also try swapping out the Wic t1, could be a bad piece of hard
are you sending the packets with the DF bit set? Check that. try all ones
or 4040 or all zero's pings. If those don't go trough, it's probably the
lec.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclos
No only bandwidth command. Can the capacity of a link, yes.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone ever passed it yet?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about 1.75Mbps.
If you take 10/255=3.9%
take 45Mbps (total speed of T3)* 3.9% and you get the approx answer of 1.75
Mbps.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTEC
You need to config the CSU/DSU or service-mod to utilize the correct number
of channels on the port, regardless of CIR. ELMI or traffic-shaping is used
to shape CIR speed.
SO if you orderd a full T1, but only had a 64K circuit (I hope you are using
the other channels for voice or something) you
As far as cisco, I can't imagine being able to filet on options type. I can
only think of the following examples to classfiy/filer on:
dscp
ip prec/tos
cos
input int
SA
DA
access-group
mpls
or or protocol as defined in NBAR
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: ht
IBM and Dell models are are supported also. I was talking to someone one
time about why they have such a restrictive policy, and they said they were
getting more PC support calls then CallMannager issues, so they just locked
down a few servers that they know could handle the software
You can always go to Cisco and use thier racks for free. If I need a few
days on a big router or ATM, I use their stuff. (I could never justify
purchasing all the equipment some people have -72xx routers, Cat 6500
switches, Wireless AP's, etc..) You just need to have your CCIE written
p
So I guess frame-relay assumes a smart network/dumb host type situation?
The only other thing I saw was Fred's statement
"...None of these companies had much IP experience at the time, and it was
mostly X.25-experienced people working on it. So the congestion issues
needed to be b
Technically you must buy from cisco, but I've seen other ways of getting it
lo load
""Jim Bond"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if I can load CallManager 3.1 on any
> Compaq server or I have to buy from Cisco? I got error
> message "
I have been searching as to the purpose of these FECN and BECN bits, and I
found this in an old newsgroup from 1994 from a guy who wrote part of Frame
Relay standards. Looks like Howard and Pricilla were right in that IP
wasn't a concern, as IBM had SDLC and ATT & BellCore had x.25
Someone on the list (I think it was Chuck) used to try and keep track of how
many new IE numbers they saw each week. I was wondering, with the new lab,
how many on avg are passing ea. week or month. Just curious.
Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31318&t=3
Check the load on the link. Check cpu load. Check sh int to make sure no
int's were reset. Check with your service provider to make sure they're not
having any problems, check with the LEC to check your circut to see if it's
dirty.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Ethereal. It's been ported from Linux to Win32. It's lightweight. But
it's not perfect and can crash.
www.ethereal.com
If you use Windows 2000 or XP, just be sure to install the winpcap diver 2.3
beta. Otherwise 2.2 should work.
http://netgroup-serv.polito.it/winpcap/
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
I have experience with all sorts of ones, from Distributed Sniffer Pro 4.5
down to the free ones like ethereal and eEye's one. I like ethereal the
best because it's so lightwweight (Sniffer is so taxing on PC's) and can
read any prodect's cap files. It does everything you need. The only
problem
I had some lunk with the Intergrating Voice and Data Networks book. Also
the internet helped me out.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
could you have duplex mismatches? Try locking them down to same speeds.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another question,
When's IPv6 gonna hit the mainstream? Or the backbone? Of all the stuff I
ever read on it, the main reason it came into play was because of the
impending depletion of public addresses. Well with NAT, firewall and other
proxy services handiling a lot of requests ont
I understand that FR is multi-protocol, but I feel confident in saying that
most traffic is IP based.
With that out of the way, historically, why did the writers of frame-relay
include BECN as a method of congestion control when 1, it isn't end-to-end
as TCP is, and therefore not as &quo
I hear what your saying. Layer 8 of the OSI model sucks. :)
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought it was badly written in that you had to know what Cisco said was
the right way to do things, regardless if it really was. You constantly had
to figure out what it was they wanted. I saw questions like "What feature
is *least* significant, and other vague ones.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
I hear what your saying. Layer 8 of the OSI model sucks. :)
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who pays for any feature in IOS? If you do David, I have a bridge I'd like
to sell you. I like to keep my network designs simple, not fancy.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondiscl
g=C3=A9n=C3=A9rales of the product: EuroPrice allows a conversion
automatis=C3=A9e = documents Word and Tableaux Excel = C3=A0 Euro. Its
int=C=A9gration = perfect = C3=A0 Word (95, 97, 2000 and XP) and Excel (95,
97, 2000 and XP) = make it tr=C3=A8s intuitive, and tr=C3=A8s powerful. A
module =
nothing yet. Cisco will be releasing DHRP soon though.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT happens first out. Access-list happens first in I believe.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A properly designed anti-virus scheme will have e-mail virus protection
software on the e-mail servers AND on the client. Plus, there ae way more
worms and virii in a corporate based, Outlook/Exchange mail system than any
web-based e-mail service. The worms are getting so bad, when they attack
Integrating Voice and Data Networks.
CVOICE
Look up these topics on CCO:
LLQ, FRTS, MLPPP, FRF.12, dial-peers, CallManager and H.323
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [
re you all have.
That dosen't mean we should all block e-mail. IM has a stigma as a toy for
teens on AOL, and it just isn't that way anymore. It does have it's place.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.h
It was the only test I ever failed. If you ask me, there's not much market
demand for CCDP's (which makes the test a low priority), and for the amount
you have to study to pass the test, it's not worth it. It's good to learn
though, because it covers a lot of broad topics,
My Bad. The RSA Certificate was for the Passport account. MSN Messenger
uses an MD5 hash. Still more secure than most e-mail accounts.
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I hate to break it to you, but almost al
d, not MSN
Messenger.
""David Tran"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >The messages are usually smaller than e-mail. And
> > no they aren't insecure (well besides the gaping hole AIM just patched).
> A
> > stateful fire
I can't imagine the problem with Messenger apps. I feel that instant
communication can be handy at times. Sometimes I hate waiting for an e-mail
response, and a messenger service fits that niche nicely. And no, they
don't waste bandwidth. The messages are usually smaller than e-mai
Is it necessary to memorize tcp/ip/udp/ppp etc,. packet structures for the
CCIE test? Does anyone out therre know that stuff cold without using a
sniffer?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31023&t=31023
--
question to the
entire group in hopes that some are strong in my weakness. SNMP and
management as a whole are not things I have ever dealt with beyond academia.
So first is there a MIB that defines the IP address of an interface?
Can I send a Trap if the IP address of an interface changes?
Is there a
Not real sure how to calcualte loss budget. I'm going to just have to
increase power and hope for best.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How does one bounce the signal? With a third access point, like a triangle?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will two Cisco Aironet Wireless Access points work through trees? The two
buildings are only 305m apart, but there are trees in between the two
buildings. In winter there are no leaves on the trees, so they have line of
sight, but with leaves in the spring and summer, will it still work?
Can th
t; That is one of the funniest hacks I've ever seen ;)
>
> Have you ever seen the one where that guy tried the ultimate coolant on
his
> motherboard? It was some kind of non-conductive oil cooled by a
> refrigerator compressor to below freezing. The entire motherboard
interfaces?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rohm
> PS: Is there a tool on CCO that would have helped me arrive at the answer?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30866&t=30857
--
FAQ, list archives, and
CCO login required. Click on configure a product, the find a product tab.
""Gaz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think it is the lowest price router, but I suppose it depends what you
> intend to do with it and what othe
Ole,
It is not unheard of for a cable between the CSU and the demarc (SJ) to
start flaking out. You said that "you did that", meaning what? Did you
replace the cable and reset the WIC or did you do one and not the other?
I've had a simple reseat of the cable into the back of the
It's not uncommon. It was probably a bad cable more than a loose WIC.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've heard of a Cisco antenna boosters. Check the qprg. or
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/witc/ao340ap/prodlit/airoa_ds.htm
Some directional antennas can get up to 25 miles. You may need a line of
sight though. Check with Cisco
FYI, Linksys wireless access points can be hacke
I may going out on a limb here, but I doubt it.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Jay Creasy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have any info on the IDS test. Specifically, Do you have to
> memories the couple hundered p
ansmit first. What I
don't
> understand is why there are runt frames that are exactly the same number
as
> the input errors. I have tried moving the cable to another switchport and
> the same issue - at least the switch is not a problem now.
>
> A runt frame is a packet that is l
quot;>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I read up on it. It appears to have been developed for beneficial purposes
> but is also a hacker tool. The written material says its a set of tools
> actually The relevant one uses ARP, not ICMP. (There was no mention of
ICMP
> being used.) It sends a
2002 12:36 PM
> To: 'Andrew Larkins'
> Subject: RE: Excess collisions on Ethernet interface [7:30769]
>
>
> Andrew,
>
> Check that your 3548 is configured as 10meg half duplex as well (NOT
> AUTOSENSE)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Lar
Dsniff uses icmp default gateway redirects (the ICMP message that tells
hosts that a differnt router has a better path to the destination network).
This will automatically make the user's PC redirect all traffic to your PC
dynamically (the client never knows about it), because he thinks you
I need to do more studying on this topic, so forgive me for asking, but why
does the conf. reg change according to line console speed?? I thought the
confreg was just a setting telling the router whare to boot from? Does it
do more?
""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in mess
As everyone else has said, this is normal for a shared access netowrk. Look
for routing protocol updates and other things as well . On ATT's
cable-modem network you can see the ospf hello updates, who the DR and BDR
is and other things. It can be fun. Try dsniff or some other program an
9.25/
>
> This is Cisco.com.
>
> Probably not a NAT/PAT issue.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: NAT problems. [7:306
Try Wendel Odom's CCNA Exam Certification Guide. Please try to config a
router a few times if you haven't yet before you take the CCNA. It will
make your knowledge more concrete.
For practice tests, try Boson.com, examcram.com, etc. Cisco even has some
tests that have the real qu
Someone at Cisco was just telling me about a guy who came in from Korea to
take the CCIE lab and during lunch, he called TAC on one of the problems.
The TAC tech recognized the problem as a lab problem from his CCIE test,
called down to the lab instructors to see if that person was taking the lab
Thanks.
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, it's in IEEE 802.3. It's in Clause 28 of the IEEE 802.3 2000 Edition.
> It might have been in earlier versions too.
>
> Priscilla
>
> A
ation is infamous for not working as advertised! ;-) It's not
> just Cisco equipment.
>
> There is definitely a problem when introducing older 10BaseT equipment
into
> the equation, which it sounds like Ole did. Perhaps one of the more
> hardware, physical-layer type engineers re
ch ethernet"
>
> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/ts_122701.html
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/servpro/solutions/long_ethernet/
>
> lots more.
>
> Interesting product and market. Interesting, because on the surface, it
> doesn't seem like it would b
I just did a serach and people on amazon hate it. I wouldn't waste your
money.
""Rob"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi folks,
>
> Anyone have any experience with the Cisco CCNP Training Kit? Any info
> or
Who is it trying to talk to? What is supposed to be happening? And what is
it that is happening exactly?
""Tom Richs"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone know why machines on a switch are arping itself such that it can
How is wildcard the natural method for hardware to match on? I can't
conceptualize it. I write it out in binary, and I can't figure out what
operation a processor would use to match on.
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EM
The Autosense feature should be taken with a grain of salt. If you need a
specific connection to work, you should set the speed and duplex manually.
One of the first thing I became aware of many years ago is that most "auto"
features are spastic at best ON ANY EQUIPMENT. Not just C
It's unfortunate that sometimes when things break, they don't perform in
expected ways. Rather it truly was an Autosense problem or not, who knows.
But it brings up a chance to talk about Autosense. I've had it bite me more
than once. I've had problems with Autosense that
Cisco will be comming out with DHRP which will do just that.
""2387"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello, I am looking for a simple program to monitor an ip and email me
when
> it
> goes up or down. Can anyone recommend a
t"?
Chuck
""Leigh Anne Chisholm"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> There are three possible states of a CCIE: Active, Suspended, and
Inactive.
> Active indicates you are a CCIE in good standing - you've met all of the
> c
I don't think the survey's are inflated. There's one on tcp mag also that
seems OK too. They seem right on topic.
""Puckette, Larry (TIFPC)"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> A new direction for the topic It
gt; ""Leigh Anne Chisholm"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > There are three possible states of a CCIE: Active, Suspended, and
> Inactive.
> > Active indicates you are a CCIE in good standing - you've met all of the
&
Not for a while. There hasn't even been a beta yet. They'll announce the
change months in advance.
""gavin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know if the ccie written will change on Jan 1
>
> Or som
I tried the online ones that are free from Cisco and they're pretty good for
the basic and intermediate stuff.
There are only a few that are free though and you need to have avalid login.
No guest accounts.
""juno vtv"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"&g
What defines an active CCIE? The thing I don't get is you have to recertify
every two years, but the cert can expire after one if you are not "active".
What is active? Do you have to answer e-mail surveys every month or
something?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=
I thought the .# (EX: 12.2(1.2) the .2 means it was internal build) after in
a IOS release meant it was internal build only? How could one DL an
internal IOS build?
""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> As a fin
As a final fwp to this post, I opened a case with Cisco and found that
indeed I had run into an IOS Bug. IOS 12.1E, 12.1T and 12.2 are not
recommended as they all suffer from this bug. Apparently this was broken
somewhere in 12.1. Here is a list of versions that have the fix:
12.2(2.2)T 12.2(1.2
s and Data Link Switching Plus
VI: Controlling Networks and Network Access
14: Mastering Access Lists
VII: Enhanced Network Protocols; The Quick and Dirty Feature Sets
15: Configuring NAT
16: Using HSRP
17: Configuring NTP
18: Final Practice Labs
Appendix A: Route Maps
Appen
The guy's description said it was brand new, even though the category said
used. I can't imagine it being used.
""juno vtv"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I only see one in stock at half.com and it's used. Am I in the wrong
place?
Message Posted at:
http:
ou have it
> yet? I don't know why I'm asking now since my copy will be here tomorrow.
> :-) I'm just curious to see if anyone else has had a chance to crack its
> pages yet.
>
> John
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30256&
Why does Cisco want so many people to get their CCIE?
""Rich Russell"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> www.bestwebbuys.com/books
>
> ranks the books from cheapest to most expensive with shipping
>
> Rich
> www.thetestpage.net
>
> ""juno vtv"" wrote in message
>
I was reading on the IETF pages that IBM claims to have patented some or all
portions of the MPLS IETF standards. How valid is their claim and could it
hold up? I remember a few years ago that Lucent was trying to cash in on
ATM which BellLabs invented in the 80's. That didn't
In a secondary interface, you can have 1 interface with 2 addresses/subnets.
A subinterface is different in that you create multiple interfaces, as
opposed to the 1 in the secondary interface. You do all the addressing by
creating sepreate logical interfaces. These subinterfaces look like
I took them both. CIPT is easy, not very detailed and a Sylvain test. I
had about 60 questions, not 125. EVODD and PBX Fundamentals are hard and
are online and not fun. QOS is just as bad.
""Dave Luancing"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROT
:30121]
>Chuck,
> You'll get my vote on being the Saruman! Howard, is it
possible
>that there might be a few copies of your new book on hand for sale. I got
>to thinking a signed copy would do nicely for all of us who haven't seen
the
>movie yet...Imagi
SUCCESS!!
I wanted to pass along a thanks to those of you that took the time to work
on this yesterday. Further, wanted you to know that I have successfully
configured it today. I was trying this yesterday on 2 2600s that were
running Version 12.2(2)XA. Today, I switched over to 2 2500s that are
that route. All of my
results follow the examples until this point. I've tried the lab several
times and my configs are correct. If anyone has had any luck with this lab
or if you could throw it together real quick, I'd appreciate it. It only
requires 2 routers and a fairly simple config.
Please is need i help in relation to above subject. Is there any other way
that i can transfer data from one pc to another,without using Dial up modem?
My company is in the business of data transering & am looking into this
issue.
Kind regards,
Mike.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupst
If I may suggestPlease pay particularly close attention to how you
address the devices that you intend to advertise. I often have customers who
purchase 2 T1s and want to acquire equal loads on both. The mistake is when
they advertise a www server that takes all of the traffic. Based on
I've read Doyle Vol II. Now I'm reading Caslow. I've flipped through
Halabi's book. He actually has a statement regarding RR vs. Confed.
According to Halabi, "Cisco recommends RRs to solve the full-mesh IBGP
issue." It would seem that RRs are easier to implement if y
I'm currently tearing apart BGP as part of my IE studies. It's not too bad
since I come from a Network Service Provider background. But, I have run
into a conflict in regards to RRs vs. Confeds. I probably don't need to
straighten this out for the Written but when it comes to the
I mean the gateway on your PC if you are on the 12.x.x.x network when
trying. it.
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> FYI,
>
> I plugged that exact config you sent into a 2621 with 12.2.6 IOS and it
&
FYI,
I plugged that exact config you sent into a 2621 with 12.2.6 IOS and it
worked fine. I could telnet into an Exchange 2000 server via 25 and 110 on
the same LAN , and on the external lan usine the natted external IP addres.
It worked in both instances with 25 and 110 with CBAC on and with
.2.6a (I know I'm crazy but I might want
> > cisco's support)
> > what version of IOS have these problems?
>
> I know it wasn't in 12.2!! As i said before, I don't think it's doing
> anything cept eating up NVRAM when you add, for example, inspect h
via telnet, you're in. Only
CBAC would block it if you tried to login into the server, or some other
ESMTP command, and that's only if it was on. You sure the server isn't bad?
""Ray Brehm"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The routing protocol info should be passed over a separate network like ss7
is. It would aslo prevent bgp flapping also when links are so flooded even
hello's can't get through.
""Eric Rogers"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL P
The prefix command is just a command that adds that number to the digits the
router will pass. When you dial 9 right now, the router has no match for
that number and imediatley gives you that busy signal. When you dial 8, it
shouldn't give you a busy signal until the interdigit timeout
The CBAC dosen't understand ESMTP commands I think. Don't watch smtp on
CBAC. I ran into that problem before.
""Ray Brehm"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a 2621 with IOS IP/FW that I'm unable to conn
According to RFC 1305, NTP uses UDP.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Mcfadden, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NTP Question [7:29770]
A friend of mine was doing a PIX installation on the edge of a W2K
connection-less at the layer 2 level (frame relay). Higher levels will take
care of retrans.
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> a PVC is connection oriented - by definition - otherwise the virtual
circuit
> won&
No reason in particular. Just thought it was more taxing than OSPF.
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >I need an internet gateway router (via DSL connected to a Flowpoint)
which
> >currently has a
I need an internet gateway router (via DSL connected to a Flowpoint) which
currently has a static route to the ISP to know when the netowrk goes down
and not just that flowpoint's local ethernet interface. I need the gateway
router to dial up via isdn using dialer-watch. I'd rathern
Is it feasable to have an ISP set up an OSPF routing area with it's
customer, and have them inject a single external route into the area, where
one can distribute it as a default route? If I create a NSSA, and they give
us a route to them, is that OK? Any downfalls?
Steve
Message Post
When you burst, you get DE's. It's not a problem.
FECN and BECN are status messages from frame switch telling router to slow
down (you can ignore them if you want). DE's are just tags on the packet
that tell the frame switches that if it has to drop any packets due to
congesti
801 - 900 of 1310 matches
Mail list logo
