ing pagefile, ergo Exchange wants to use memory if it is
available. Now do you understand why we always use that line?
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, October
Why is that correct?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2003 16:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
The correct line is, "You didn't buy all that memory just to have it go
unused, now did you?"
Ed Crowley
Something strange is happening with POP3 clients on our Exchange 5.5 SP4
server. When they send mail to other mailboxes on the exchange server, no
problem, the mail arrives immediately. When they send to external recipients
the mail takes ages to be delivered, e.g. we sent a test message on Thursda
ackup
Veritas NetBackup can be fully controlled via CLI.
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:47 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Brick Level Backup
> Subject: RE: Brick
We are being forced to re-evaluate arcserve by our development team because
it's the only product they've found that they can properly interface with
via CLI or API. This isn't for exchange backups, but I still feel a bit sick
about the idea of arcserve being installed on any of our servers.
We're
gt; Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
>
>
> I do.
>
> It is rather annoying to hear people speaking incorrectly.
>
> Please drive through.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, Au
Do you enjoy correcting people's grammar when you're not on the internet?
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 August 2003 19:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
>
>
> That would be "you're"
are set to be of
Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly.
Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP?
-Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uselessthoughts.com
- Original Message -
From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm thinking about trying out citrix
> -Original Message-
> From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Entourage
>
>
> So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative?
>
> -Origina
> Configuring an Outlook for the Mac to
> connect across subnets? I need that ongoing pain like I need
> another hole in my head.
It's not hard, just a hosts file or DNS entry then it workshow is this
so different from windows?
> > Why did they get rid of the Outlook product?
>
> Hopefull
An update is available for office X on the mac which includes the new
exchange-aware entourage.
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/downloads.aspx?pid=download&location=/mac/DOWNL
OAD/OFFICEX/exchangeupdate.xml&secid=5&ssid=14&flgnosysreq=True
Our first impressions are that it's a load of rubbish. Seems
ng off the option for the Information Store, but
> have now modified the job to backup the PRIV.EDB as well.
> Only reason we're doing this is because we would like to have
> the actual PRIV.EDB in a backup media for access by one of
> our 3rd party applications that can access t
3rd party applications that can access the PRIV.EDB, and
> extract mailboxes or actual messages.
>
> Paul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subjec
No, you don't have to stop the services.
Please clarify how you are using veritas; i.e. are you looking on the
relevant drive and ticking priv.edb as a file to backup? If so, this won't
work, you need to tick 'Microsoft Exchange Information Store' in the veritas
directory tree. If this doesn't app
, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: best linux av?
Yes, I see your point, although I'
-
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 04 July 2003 15:50
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: R
Jason
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel
> > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 10:22 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: best linux av?
> >
&
and above whatever gateway virus
> protection you might be running.
>
> Jason
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel
> > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:56
--
> Paul Hutchings
> Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
> Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 04 July 2003 14:56
> > To: Exchang
ike Scanmail on the
> Exchange box, given the file blocking capabilities and all.
>
> regards,
> Paul
> --
> Paul Hutchings
> Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
> Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -Original
> Me
just wondering if anyone has a favourite AV scanner for linux with postfix
as the mta? our trend renewal is coming up and i'm thinking i'd like to
remove the CPU burden of AV scanning from the exchange box and put it on our
linux relay which also does the spam filtering.
thanks
dan.
_
s to see what's going on.
>
> -Jeroen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Atkinson, Daniel
> Sent: woensdag 18 juni 2003 14:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: slow login with mac clien
client exchange profile
> to see if the slow logon still occurs?
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2003 13:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: slow login with mac clients after restore.
>
>
>
nything earlier than Mac OSX. If you are running MacOSX
> > then bring up a terminal window and run it from there.).
> >
> > This will do for a start.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Nate Couch
> > EDS Messaging
> >
> > > --
>
n use MacPing to determine this if you
> run anything earlier than Mac OSX. If you are running MacOSX
> then bring up a terminal window and run it from there.).
>
> This will do for a start.
>
> Regards.
>
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
>
> > --
>
last night we did a restore because we've been getting some database errors
in the event log. we restored from a good backup and played in the log files
as normal - everything worked great and we're up and running again, except
now our mac users with outlook 2001 take about 5 minutes to log in.
t
2. What domain are these users logging into?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:54 AM
> Subject: seems like a name resolution problem
I have an exchange server at another office on the end of a vpn tunnel. When
the users from that office come here to work they can't connect to it.
Similarly, when our users go there they can't connect to the exchange server
here. The servers are in different orgs and different nt domains, no trust
Is this wireless calendar or sync?
> -Original Message-
> From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 January 2003 14:23
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
>
>
> Exchange
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [ma
I have a user working at a customer site who has mail forwarded from an
account on the customer's Groupwise server to our exchange server. She can
read the mail fine when dialled in with Outlook, but no good with OWA. The
mails appear as attachments called 'read.htm' and when she opens them it
says
You could do this in excel using VBA, write a little app that will parse the
text file and update the excel sheet. Any VB/VBA developer should be able to
help you with this.
> The idea is to find/create a little code that pushes the data
> in this txt file to exell on a daily basis.
>
> Do y
We are in a trial period with blackberry on the O2 (BT cellnet) network -
it's working very well.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 November 2002 15:43
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000
You need to read the disaster recovery white paper (search on
support.microsoft.com) and get daily online backups working properly. When
you have this worked out, get a recovery server (any old box will do, just
get a big IDE disk in it for the IS) and do some test restores. Also
configure deleted
We have four domains with a complete-trust model. Mailboxes have NT accounts
from any of these domains. No problems here...never had any issues sharing
calendars. This is exchange 5.5.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 November 2002 18:22
> To:
You need to configure trend e-manager (if you have it) to block it with a
rule that detects something in the subject line or message body.
This is not a virus, it is more of a confidence trick, although NAV is now
detecting the software that installs if you follow the link. As usual, this
is causi
You don't have to import it, just use file/open in outlook
> -Original Message-
> From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: viewer of PST
> Sensitivity: Private
>
> Hi exchangers,
>
> Does anyone know of a utility th
Yes I have a 2.2gb user.
I tried to set a 2.3gb limit to stop it getting any worse, but exchange 5.5
seems to only let me set up to about 2.1gb - is this normal behaviour?
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 October 2002 09:25
> To: Exchange
ECTED]]
> Sent: 18 July 2002 14:45
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: dead public folders
>
> I've experienced a similar problem in the past due. Q152433 should help
> you.
>
> Ant.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EM
Hi guys,
Our chicago office turned off an exchange server without telling us - this
was the only server in their site. They moved the mailboxes elsewhere and
trashed the server.
We removed the site connector to clean up the directory but their public
folders are still showing in our hierarchy.
Do you people know
USA qualified
for next phase of cup?
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 15:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday
The Wings won last night
Stanley is home in Detroit
Now I can get sleep.
__
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atkinson,
Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: R
7;t Modify
Gremlins.
-Original Message-----
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Distribution List Owner Can't Modify
Hi all,
I have a guy here who is owner of a load of distribution lists. He reported
to m
Hi all,
I have a guy here who is owner of a load of distribution lists. He reported
to me today that he can no longer modify the list memberships via outlook. I
found I could fix the problem by going into the distribution list properties
(where he is showing as owner) and re-selecting him as the
--- Original Message -----
From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
>
> Yes we can claim your spelling is wrong. It's our language and
Yes we can claim your spelling is wrong. It's our language and you lot don't
talk it right or spell proper.
Come on, you even think we're playing the 'soccer' world cup right now.
dan.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:57
nd question
On 5/31/02 9:08 AM, "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running trend scanmail/emanager and I can't figure out how to block
> messages completely - i.e. if I set up a rule to block messages with the
> subject 'test', when
I have it set to delete - still the messages get through...
-Original Message-
From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 May 2002 15:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: trend question
You will have to set the "Action" to delete. when setting the policy up.
THis is on te
Hi all,
I'm running trend scanmail/emanager and I can't figure out how to block
messages completely - i.e. if I set up a rule to block messages with the
subject 'test', when I send a message with the subject 'test' from hotmail I
still get a message in the recipient's inbox with subject 'test'
No you don't have to reboot.
I have re-installed 5.5 so many times (during DR testing) that I could do it
with no limbs. I even know the CD-key.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 May 2002 16:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Ex
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the urgent flag. This triggers
an immediate site visit from The Queen of England, who has recently
completed her MCSE (some people say she used braindumps).
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 May 2002 1
I have a large movie collection in a PST file, which I access across the
network.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 May 2002 16:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: completely OT
How does this affect Exchange ??
Yours,
Julian Stone
---
Do everything. The whole program flow. In 3D.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 17:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mailflow chart
Possibly I could do one up right quick. Local, intrasite or extrasite? What
kind of site conne
Yeah, the way outlook handles online/offline is rubbish, especially what
happens if the connection to the server is lost.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 16:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Switch to "Online"
In current ver
it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today!
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp
"Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for
Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz
8-16-01
- Original Message
ans you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz
8-16-01
- Original Message -
From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:44 AM
Subject: RE: Delegating Admi
Sorry, 5.5 sp4.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 11:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Delegating Admin Duties
What version of Exchange?
- Original Message -
From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL P
I never had any issues with exchange-aware apps on the SBS. They just see a
regular 5.5 server so I'm sure scanmail would be fine.
Might be worth mailing trend though.
dan
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 11:42
To: Exchange Discussio
Hi guys,
We have a few sites around the country but they all access a central
exchange server here at head office. I'm thinking about delegating admin
duties (i.e. creating new mailboxes) to the technical guys at each site.
Is there any best practice here? I know I could create separate recip
Could this be the cached directory thing that also delays a change in
primary NT Account?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q179065
dan
-Original Message-
From: Romeo, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 18:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Give them the user rights to log on locally on the owa box.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 April 2002 15:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA
Hello,
I created two new users and both cannot access their mailbox on OWA.
When I tr
We had similar problems with our SAN after adding some new disks and
assigning these to a separate non-exchange server - outlook started giving
lots of 'requesting data from server' messages and other apps using the SAN
for data storage also suffered poor performance.
A complete shutdown and rest
Yeah, well, how many technical experts are going to work as a first-line
phone jockey?
> I sense that through any of the brands the first level
> support people are just there to go through the very basic
> troubleshooting and try to make you believe that there is
> nothing really wrong with y
Hi guys,
We have an exchange org with 2 sites. If a user in the UK site picks an
address of a user in the US site from the GAL, delivery fails with an NDR
like this...
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
IMCEAEX-_O=SEVEN+20WORLDWIDE+2C+20INC+2E_OU=MIDWEST_cn=RECIPIENTS_cn=GEORGE+
Forget the ping, it may well be discarded by a firewall. Telnet to the
remote mailserver on port 25 by typing this into the command line...
telnet mail.spectra.ca 25
if that fails try
telnet 24.85.12.237 25
if that works, look at your DNS. If it fails, phone your ISP.
Dan.
-Origin
For peace of mind I used to take a weekly offline backup on Saturday nights,
automating the stop/start of services with a batch file. After many
successful trial restores with online backups, I stopped doing it.
Restarting the services once in a while sounds like a good idea though - I
might sche
> Yowza. Keep these posts coming.
> They want to cluster here and I am fighting the good fight with these
>little snippets!
Well, the arguments are simple...
1. you have to do active/passive clustering, so you'll always have one
expensive server doing absolutely nothing. What a waste!
2. All y
My production server is a high-spec DELL box with plenty of redundancy built
in. I have an identical recovery server which when not needed for recovery
purposes runs slave DNS, secondary WINS, monitoring for the production
server etc. We have a SAN for the directory and store data, with lots of
re
> He doesnt need the Exchange Agent to do an online Exchange-aware backup of
> the store.
Really, how? I think the exchange options are greyed out in our backup exec
until you install the agent.
Dan
_
List posting FAQ: htt
if there are any more jobs
> with cars where you work
>
> Lucky devil!
>
> Phil
>
> -
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: A
review yesterday
got a company car now
plus salary raise
:)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAI
in england, the 'home secretary' is perhaps the most powerful person in the
country, moreso than the prime minister in many ways.
a secretary is also a kind of bookcase, i believe.
> That sounds like nonsense. Colin Powell doesn't seem to be terribly
> offended to be called that.
>
> Ed Crowl
i have, curling rules. i always wanted to have a go at the sweeping...they
go mental with those little brooms...
> I haven't seen a good curling match in years =)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 04
d play..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
>
>
> Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring.
>
> -Original Message-
hange Discussions
> Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
>
>
> did everyone stop playing golf suddenly?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subjec
iginal Message-
> From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
>
>
> Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAI
> did everyone stop playing golf suddenly?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:16 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
>
>
> yes, that'
ely football/soccer is also boring.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson,
> Daniel
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
>
>
> haha, corr
haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one
that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet
to kick the ball...
seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start
and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks.
>
if you mean, 'add an additional exchange server to an existing exchange
site', just run the installer on your new hardware and follow the wizard. it
takes about five minutes.
> Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too
> a existing
> exchange server.
>
>
> ___
gt;
> Hopefully last question:
>
> What if the Public folder has subfolders?
> 1. How do you get them in the favorites?
> 2. do you have to set offline for each subfolder?
>
>
>
> Joshua Morgan
> PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
right click the folder under your favourites, bring up properties, go to
synchronization tab, configure...
> -Original Message-
> From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 January 2002 15:41
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folders and OST
>
>
> SO iset
exchange + mscs = sleep deprivation
look forward to cluster services failing for no apparent reason, exchange
services not responding properly to actions in cluster administrator,
dubious failover etc etc
in 4 months with the cluster we had plenty of downtime during working hours,
terrible. Sinc
norton wins? are they mad?
symantec are too slow with their updates, hours behind trend during recent
outbreaks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sites
is this essential? i just checked our pix and smtp fixup is enabled - i'm
not aware of any problems though...
> -Original Message-
> From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 January 2002 12:23
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Troublesome I
mine is set to run early hours when the backup finishes.
dan.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 January 2002 17:19
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IS Maintenance
>
>
> What is the best practice for IS maintenance?? Do you have it run
tell them you can show them how to access mailboxes if they want you to, but
also tell them that there might be legal implications that they should check
with their human resources people or the company lawyers.
if you're not qualified to offer legal advice, then they should know that,
and shoul
use Outlook as it's intended - as an exchange client, not imap or pop3. then
you get all the collaborative features of exchange (scheduling, public
folders, custom forms etc etc). without this you're not really justifying
the outlay for exchange.
give the laptop users offline folders and set up O
> versions if
> needed. If you can tie it back into the Exchange system then
> you'll be the
> hero.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Atkinson, Daniel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:02 AM
> > To: Ex
.
>
> Of course all of the about is a behavioral issue, so there is
> not much we
> can do about it other than to educate the users.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Atkinson, Daniel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2
problems."
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Atkinson, Daniel
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: PST policies
>
>
> thanks fo
IS is small enough that you don't waste your time waiting
> when you have to do something with your IS.
>
> Brian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atkinson,
> Daniel
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:20
;s?
>
> PST's on file servers aren't "bad" per-say, just a waste of time and
> resources and a potential headache for the admin...
>
> Joe Pochedley
> "I like deadlines,"
> cartoonist Scott Adams once said.
> "I especially like the whooshing
mpaq Computer Corporation
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atkinson,
> Daniel
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
&g
it does take about 24 hours to get all the way around the world, but you
will find zone transfers to regional dns servers can happen almost
instantly. for example, if i update my external dns hosted here in london
and reload, the new records are correctly served by DNS servers in other
parts of th
> Get your boss fired
> Then take control of your life
> Work from home all day
this is sound advice
though how best to get boss fired?
time to plant some drugs
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Ar
> Working from home rocks
> VPN and VNC
> means laundry gets done
yes it rocks it's true
but you must convince the boss
that's what i can't do
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
ok, check this pst scenario:
exchange site in uk, 450 users, 400mb mailbox limit, 30gb store.
servers are located in london, remote sites in northern cities connect via
2mbps links.
users often hit the mailbox limit and have to archive to pst. in london,
they just move items to a pst on their l
ed there if
> your monitoring workstation is on the other side of the DMZ?
> Or do you
> simply use some kind of paging system when it reaches a threshold?
>
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
>
> > --
> > From: Atkinson, Daniel
> > Reply To: [EMAI
e the
> lazy route you
> are likely to pay for it in other ways.
>
> Regards
>
> Dom.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 11:46
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: firewall problem
>
ld you know if the hosts attached (seeming to be specified) are
> actually the hosts you specified?
> .. you would not.
>
> B
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 01:46
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Sub
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
