Re: TB Shut down on Periodical Check

2002-08-26 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Peter, On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:37:52 +0200 GMT (26/08/02, 22:37 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: JS>>> I'm not sure which problem area triggered TB to shut down but I JS>>> suspect it was the 150+ email addresses that were listed in the JS>>> subject line ;). PP> There's _no_ such limi

Re: "Automatically mark all as read in a folder once viewed" option

2002-08-26 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Alaeddin, On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:25:39 +0400 GMT (26/08/02, 20:25 +0700 GMT), Alaeddin Muntasser wrote: AM> I could not find key assignment in the help menu. Could you please AM> tell me how to get to that option? I'd like to do the same as ben. View / Edit Shortcuts and Options / Defin

Re: Wildcard filtering

2002-08-25 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Richard, On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 18:13:35 +0100 GMT (26/08/02, 00:13 +0700 GMT), Richard Lane wrote: RL> Sorry if this is blindingly obvious but it's driving me nuts. It is. RL> I'm trying to set up a filter that will filter @TheSameDomain.com RL> into a single folder but without much luck.

Re: Invalid Argument to date encode

2002-08-20 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Simon, On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:49:44 +0100 GMT (20/08/02, 19:49 +0700 GMT), Simon Higgs wrote: SH> What files do I have to delete to wipe the address book and start SH> again? Drive:\Program Files\The Bat!\Mail\TheBat.abd -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Lis

Re: HTML...

2002-08-20 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Adam, On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:53:51 +0100 GMT (20/08/02, 18:53 +0700 GMT), Adam Rykala wrote: AR> Its a proxy that kills ads, malicious javascript and stuff that like - consider AR> it a sanitiser for HTMl. You install it, point your web browser to use it as a AR> proxy and it cleans the

Re: Trial period expired - TB! blocked

2002-08-20 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Joyce, On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:56:11 +0200 GMT (20/08/02, 15:56 +0700 GMT), Joyce Sala wrote: JS> On day 30 TB! "yelled at me" that the trial period was finished, JS> would I want an extra extension of 7 days' evaluation? I obviusly JS> said yes, hoping to get the stuff by then. JS> Well,

Re: HTML...

2002-08-19 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Adam, On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 03:34:03 +0100 GMT (20/08/02, 09:34 +0700 GMT), Adam Rykala wrote: AR> Do you think there is any point of pushing TB! developers towards this - or some AR> similar system for rendering HTML? Could you describe in a few words what Proxomitron is and does? -- C

Re: anti-spam suggestions

2002-08-18 Thread Thomas F.
Hello John, On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:03:24 +1000 GMT (17/08/02, 08:03 +0700 GMT), John Phillips wrote: JP> And all gained from spam! Only cost me a fortune, of course. Since you know about the price, I see you read your spam attentively. That a boy! -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen

Re: HTML messages

2002-08-18 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Alaeddin, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:32:02 +0400 GMT (18/08/02, 14:32 +0700 GMT), Alaeddin Muntasser wrote: >> (much to some peoples disgust) or including an HTML feature in AM> Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity. It is not bad for some people, it is bad for all people.

Re: Customizable From field

2002-08-17 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Ivan, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 03:02:11 UT GMT (18/08/02, 10:02 +0700 GMT), Ivan Vecanski wrote: IV> When composing an email it seems that only the addresses of existing IV> accounts appear in the History drop down box for the From and Reply-To IV> fields. It won't remember other addresses I en

Re: HTML

2002-08-17 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jonathan, On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:45:43 -0500 GMT (18/08/02, 06:45 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> I haven't gone nto IMAP yet, but I did think we were talking about >> POP. The reason is that on a dial-up account, IMAP (if I understand it >> correctly) might require more online time

Re: Turning Off Msg List Status Pop-up

2002-08-17 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Peter, On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 17:22:51 +0200 GMT (17/08/02, 22:22 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: PM> Oops, I have never seen that. I have the setup as above - there have never PM> been any mouseover effects. Can it have to do with the OS (Win98SE here)? I get the tool tips also (Win98). Sele

Re: HTML

2002-08-17 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jonathan, On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 10:39:59 -0500 GMT (17/08/02, 22:39 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA> Why would you have to go about converting protocols? If I remember correctly JA> (you may want to look at the IMAP4rev1), the IMAP protocol supports the retrival JA> of partial bodies

Re: Font sizes

2002-08-17 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Databug, On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 15:45:17 +0100 GMT (17/08/02, 21:45 +0700 GMT), Databug wrote: D> Now i`ve sorted out how to change all the font sizes with the D> exception of the font in the lister tree. Does this size change in D> the system setting. Either way can someone give me a clue as

Re: moving TB (Files)

2002-08-17 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Tony, On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:07:29 +1000 GMT (17/08/02, 08:07 +0700 GMT), Tony wrote: T> The problem is that I transfered all of the content of my old Pentium T> 1 to a new Pentium 4 including stored E-Mail messages. T> I now can't open any of my registered version! Did you transfer the

Re: getting number of messages

2002-08-17 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Brano, On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 23:12:39 +0200 GMT (17/08/02, 04:12 +0700 GMT), Brano wrote: TF>> You'd better report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] then. B> I tried: B>- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - B> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> B> (reason: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: HTML

2002-08-17 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Pete, On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 20:46:37 -0600 GMT (17/08/02, 09:46 +0700 GMT), Pete Milne wrote: TF>> No. With the POP protocol, can just download mails (or not). In any TF>> case, a conversion could take place only after download. PM> Just a thought, it would save some bandwidth and maybe som

Re: HTML

2002-08-16 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Pete, On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:59:44 -0600 GMT (16/08/02, 22:59 +0700 GMT), Pete Milne wrote: PM> Forgive me if this has been asked before: AFAIK it hasn't been asked before. ;-) PM> Is there anyway to set TB! to "not" download any html mail, just PM> convert it to plain text? No. With

Re: getting number of messages

2002-08-16 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Brano, On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:30:33 +0200 GMT (16/08/02, 17:30 +0700 GMT), Brano wrote: TF>> Regardless, the Abort button should work in that case, too. I didn't TF>> check it, but it appears to belong to the same category. B> doesn't work. You'd better report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the

Re: getting number of messages

2002-08-16 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Brano, On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:42:51 +0200 GMT (16/08/02, 14:42 +0700 GMT), Brano wrote: B> No, I have different, I use w2k. But problem is: try to full your B> inbox with mails, lets say - around 100. When bat is getting number of B> messages don't allow to connect to inet (with some softw

Re: "not to me" filter problems

2002-08-15 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Julian, On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:47:30 +0100 GMT (16/08/02, 06:47 +0700 GMT), Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: JBL> In the sorting office, when you set up your filter, did you go to the JBL> Options tab, and select "Regular Expressions"? Filters do not use JBL> Regular Expressions by default. He

Re: Copy sent mail from folder to folder?

2002-08-15 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Blarp, On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:50:51 -0700 GMT (16/08/02, 08:50 +0700 GMT), Blarp wrote: B> I'd like to be able to send an e-mail from a particular folder (using B> that folder's templates) and have the sent e-mail copied or moved to B> another particular folder. How do I do this?? TB does

Re: getting number of messages

2002-08-15 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Brano, On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:25:28 +0200 GMT (15/08/02, 23:25 +0700 GMT), Brano wrote: TF>> Try the Abort button in that window. B> nothing works. I tried everything. Only one solution is via taskmgr B> shut down sending messages, and after that The BAT, and start it B> again. That's a

Re: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?

2002-08-15 Thread Thomas F.
Hallo DVM, On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 05:52:30 -0500 GMT (15/08/02, 17:52 +0700 GMT), Morton A. Goldberg, DVM wrote: > Those who were critical of the Spam Assassin folks for jumping to > unwarranted conclusions about The Bat!'s ratware capabilities might not > be aware that this very question was recen

Re: getting number of messages

2002-08-15 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Brano, On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:35:35 +0200 GMT (15/08/02, 19:35 +0700 GMT), Brano wrote: B> in this dialog The Bat! can't be cancelled and this windows hangs. B> If Bat can't determine number of messages (in that while connection is B> broken) this window can't be cancelled. Try the Abort

Re: Bug with Exclusion in Filter?

2002-08-15 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jonathan, On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 01:22:41 -0500 GMT (15/08/02, 13:22 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> Let's see. If the filter works if only the first address is in your >> addressbook, the filter conditions and actions should be correct. The >> function "check whether in AB" seems to c

Re: Removable drive

2002-08-14 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Wayne, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:46:56 -0700 GMT (15/08/02, 08:46 +0700 GMT), Wayne Black wrote: WB> Is it true that version 2.x of TheBat will have all files needed in WB> the main directory? In other words, no need for a registry file? I have not heard this, and frankly, I doubt it. The re

Re: Bug with Exclusion in Filter?

2002-08-14 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jonathan, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:24:48 -0500 GMT (15/08/02, 01:24 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh, you filter on the bounce addresses. Another smart idea I haven't seen before. :-) JA> Now for my Address book item for me: JA> Addresses: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: anti-spam suggestions II

2002-08-14 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Julian, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:18:35 +0100 GMT (14/08/02, 18:18 +0700 GMT), Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: >> I have seen some small time spammers get TOSd through SpamCop and I'm >> sure their blacklist is worthwhile but it's not going to reduce your >> spam if you report things to them. IMH

Re: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?

2002-08-14 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Lynn, On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:58:08 -0700 GMT (14/08/02, 23:58 +0700 GMT), Lynn Turriff wrote: LT> Oh dear .. and it's an old trackball, and kind of grubby, LT> too!lol! ROTFLMAO! Enjoy your meal... -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Proofread carefull

Re: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?

2002-08-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Lyle, On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:14:58 -0700 GMT (14/08/02, 00:14 +0700 GMT), Lyle Scully wrote: MT>>> Unfounded at that. No they're not professionals. LS> Actually most of them are in roles just like I am. And I do consider LS> myself a professional. I have been using SpamAssassin on our mai

Re: Log window size

2002-08-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Adam, On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:37:18 -0230 GMT (14/08/02, 00:07 +0700 GMT), Adam wrote: A> Every time I open the log window I can't see the buttons at bottom. I A> have to maximize it each time. Can I avoid this? I am not sure I understand this. Are the buttons out of your screen before yo

Re: Command Line

2002-08-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Daryl, On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:54:32 +0100 GMT (13/08/02, 23:54 +0700 GMT), Daryl Field wrote: DF> Has there been a discussion of making the backup feature 'driveable' DF> from the command line. Yes, there has been such a discussion. Repeatedly, even. Most are in favour of such a comma

Re: anti-spam suggestions

2002-08-13 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Dwight, On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:17:14 -0500 GMT (13/08/02, 22:17 +0700 GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: DAC> I've noticed that several include not only one of my current DAC> addresses, but an address which died about 3 years ago when DAC> ibm.net got swallowed by attglobal.net. If bounces clea

Re: Fw: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?

2002-08-12 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Matt, On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:41:30 -0700 GMT (13/08/02, 10:41 +0700 GMT), Matt Thoene wrote: MT> Wow, is there a full moon or something? I've posted a few messages to MT> various lists this week and have seen just brutal responses. My anger was not directed at you, but at people who make

Re: Fw: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?

2002-08-12 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Matt, On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:30:56 -0700 GMT (13/08/02, 05:30 +0700 GMT), Matt Thoene wrote: MT> Caught this thread on spamassassin. The Bat will thankfully NOT be MT> labeled as "ratware". How professional are these people? How much power (in which ever way) do they have? MT> Just noti

Re: "Sorting Office"

2002-08-12 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Miguel, On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:47:45 +0200 GMT (12/08/02, 20:47 +0700 GMT), Miguel A. Urech wrote: MAU> Sorry, I just understood the opposite. It seems that everybody did, so it was my fault, really. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Bright as Alaska

OT: Double Negative (was: "Sorting Office")

2002-08-12 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Clemens, On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:15:25 +0200 GMT (13/08/02, 05:15 +0700 GMT), Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote: CGS> Be careful with double negative, for me as a viennese it can mean CGS> something double bad, and not make it okay ... Speaking of double negatives, there is different u

Re: "Sorting Office"

2002-08-11 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Miguel, On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:23:18 +0200 GMT (12/08/02, 05:23 +0700 GMT), Miguel A. Urech wrote: >> I don't see a reason, apart from that all is displayed that you need >> to access. MAU> Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded. He's not asking MAU> to make it bigger, just

Re: asian fonts the 100ths :)

2002-08-11 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Clemens, On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:30:53 +0200 GMT (12/08/02, 04:30 +0700 GMT), Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote: CGS> well, I somehow can't belive that, cause it works in other CGS> applications too. I think, I just have to live without Asian Font CGS> support in TheBat, as it is way to

Re: "Sorting Office"

2002-08-11 Thread Thomas F.
Hello St, On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:45:04 +0200 GMT (12/08/02, 01:45 +0700 GMT), St - Musaic.Net wrote: SMN> This puzzles me: Is there any particular reason why the dialog- SMN> box for tweaking "Sorting Office" rules is non-resizeable?!?!? I don't see a reason, apart from that all is displaye

Re: "Redirect" sets Reply-To to me

2002-08-11 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Ricardo, On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 15:28:49 -0300 GMT (12/08/02, 01:28 +0700 GMT), Ricardo M. Reyes wrote: TF>> But one thing I would like to advise is that optional settings can be TF>> overdone. Please have a look here: TF>> http://www.zentrumderarbeit.org/TheBat%21/img/html-kit_preferences.gi

Re: "Redirect" sets Reply-To to me

2002-08-11 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Ben, On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 17:45:50 +0100 GMT (11/08/02, 23:45 +0700 GMT), Ben Kennish wrote: BK> But out of curiosity, why isn't there an option in the settings BK> that lets you "clear reply-to on redirect" ? BK> Shall I post it as a feature request? That is your privilege. Keep in mind

Re: asian fonts the 100ths :)

2002-08-10 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Clemens, On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 22:11:54 +0200 GMT (11/08/02, 03:11 +0700 GMT), Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote: >> Check out whether the font *size* you have chosen is actually one that >> you have in the corresponding fonts file. CGS> Well of course not. Courier New has no sets for J

Re: font after signature (repeat posting)

2002-08-10 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Ochrid, On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:18:39 +0200 GMT (2002/8/10, 23:18 +0700 GMT), Ochrid wrote: O> (That R understood Dutch, I knew, but Thomas? O> Or do you read Dutch like I 'read' German?) Ik kan niet nederlandse spraken, but I understand a bit. I grew up in Hamburg, which is just a 4 hour

Re: font after signature (repeat posting)

2002-08-10 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Ochrid, On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 17:43:20 +0200 GMT (2002/8/10, 22:43 +0700 GMT), Ochrid wrote: O> (met het schaamrood op de kaken): LOL! No need: O> I had not noticed one could scroll down! This has happened to several people before you. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen Th

Re: TOFNAME macro

2002-08-10 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Luc, On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 15:12:53 +0200 GMT (2002/8/10, 20:12 +0700 GMT), Luc wrote: L> I was wondering if it's not better to use the TOFNAME macro in all of L> them so the To field is used regardless of the recipient is in my AB L> or not. This would prevent me of switching between QT'

Re: asian fonts the 100ths :)

2002-08-10 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Clemens, On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 11:19:55 +0200 GMT (2002/8/10, 16:19 +0700 GMT), Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote: CGS> Strange thing is, that eg Chinese (GB...) characters are shown CGS> correctly in the list and headers, but not anymore in the body, CGS> thought it selects thr right en

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

2002-08-09 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Peter, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:49:06 +0200 GMT (2002/8/9, 17:49 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: TF>> However, I now have the month in numbers but want it in words (in TF>> English). I guess that's not possible with my Windows setting to TF>> Chinese. PP> Simply give it a try: change 'm

Re: Case sensitve email addresses

2002-08-09 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jonathan, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:14:47 -0500 GMT (2002/8/9, 23:14 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA> Not entirely true in extreme cases. It is possible to setup mail JA> services to act with case-sensitivity, making jon.angliss different JA> from Jon.Angliss. It is a pain to do, and re

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

2002-08-09 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Syafril, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:59:31 +0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 12:59 +0700 GMT), Syafril Hermansyah wrote: >> Does anybody know how I can set the language in the message list other >> than with the Regional setting? After all, my reply RegEx still works >> fine with English months (see above).

Re: Automate the task

2002-08-09 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Dave, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 00:07:07 -0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 14:07 +0700 GMT), Dave in Phoenix wrote: DiP> One of the virus sites had all this info including about how it uses DiP> cache files, but I forget which one it was Never mind, my question was "whether" and not "how", and you have a

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

2002-08-09 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Anthony, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 00:04:59 -0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 14:04 +0700 GMT), Anthony Xin Chen wrote: AXC> See Date/Time format specifier in Help for how to set it up. AXC> I changed it to the following, standard American date format. Thanks, that helps (I set it to the European standard).

Re: browser association (2nd posting)

2002-08-09 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Ochrid, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:36:49 +0200 GMT (2002/8/9, 14:36 +0700 GMT), Ochrid wrote: O> Mozilla is my default browser. IE takes over only when clicking O> an URL in a TB! message. Which browser is mentioned for .htm and .html in HKCR? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

2002-08-08 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Anthony, On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:02:23 +0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 12:02 +0700 GMT), Thomas F. wrote: TF> I can fully confirm this! I have set my region to Chinese (Taiwan), TF> and now the attachment default file is "*.*". You have saved my life! TF> (Well, not quite, but you

Re: Automate the task

2002-08-08 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Dave, On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:01:07 -0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 04:01 +0700 GMT), Dave in Phoenix wrote: DiP> Often "From" addresses are found by the virus in address book or DiP> cache file for browswer. Make that "Windows Address Book" (WAB) instead of "address book". If you are only using TB's

Re: The defualt file extension in Attachment Save Dialog

2002-08-08 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Anthony, On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:00:53 -0700 GMT (2002/8/9, 04:00 +0700 GMT), Anthony Xin Chen wrote: AXC> My OS is Win2K Traditional Chinese version with Service Pack 2. I am on C-Win98 (Traditional Chinese, Taiwan - Big5). AXC> The problem occurs whenever I set the region to English (US)

Re: font after signature (repeat posting)

2002-08-08 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Roelof, On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 23:12:59 +0200 GMT (2002/8/9, 04:12 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: RO> Two possibilities: RO> 1) Stop using dash,dash,space,enter in your template for that list. RO> (Helps only when you're really the only one.) You mean if he is the only one *member of that l

Re: CONTACT LIST WINDOW

2002-08-04 Thread Thomas F.
Hello KoMpLoT, On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:46:00 -0300 GMT (04/08/02, 21:46 +0700 GMT), KoMpLoT wrote: TF>> K> -- K> but isn't there a mini-view like in OE? You have received replies to this. May I kindly advise you that the sig delimiter needs to be under your message, no tabove it. TB (and eve

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-04 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jonathan, On 04 Aug 2002 08:55:13 -0500 GMT (04/08/02, 20:55 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> You are not forced to reply at the top and bottom quote the whole >> message replied to. It is still no big effort to reply inline. JA> The problem doing that is with Outlook you have to go

Top-Reply (was: USING GnuPG...)

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello ETM, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002 22:22:55 -0400 GMT (04/08/02, 09:22 +0700 GMT), ETM wrote: E> A file folder (in the US) runs with the oldest paper at the E> bottom and the current papers proceeding in chronological filing E> order to the top of the stack. Is this a country thing? No, this is do

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Adam, On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 04:14:33 +0100 GMT (04/08/02, 10:14 +0700 GMT), Adam Rykala wrote: AR> Perhaps an FAQ entry is needed, explaining the position? It is sad that it seems to be necessary. AR> This is now officially an ex-horse, it has ceased to be (well I think so)!

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello ETM, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002 21:49:04 -0400 GMT (04/08/02, 08:49 +0700 GMT), ETM wrote: E> Is it OE or is it USA programming? Contrary to popular belief, I don't think it has to do with the MUA. Even if the cursor is put in at the top of the quote, you can still make a sensible reply. You are

Re: CONTACT LIST WINDOW

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello KoMpLoT, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 23:06:47 -0300 GMT (04/08/02, 09:06 +0700 GMT), KoMpLoT wrote: K>I just can't find a way to show the contact list window for rapid K>access... where can I find it? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. In an office: W

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jan, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 12:53:52 -0400 GMT (03/08/02, 23:53 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR> Don't have scandisk/ used chkdsk reports file record JR> segments unreadable 90276 thru 90287, unrecoverable JR> problems. Here is your problem. Some disk utilities will mark those sectors

Re: No Exit

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello alists, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 04:03:44 -0700 GMT (03/08/02, 18:03 +0700 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JP>>> Bat! will not close with this annoying message. T>> I confirm this bug. But then, is it a bug, or is just the third T>> button missing, the one called "Kill the tasks"? awc> comeon!

Re: problems installing new(ish) versions

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello David, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 19:12:28 +0800 GMT (03/08/02, 18:12 +0700 GMT), David Pascoe wrote: DP> I have tried uninstalled norton anti virus and even updated to the latest DP> msi (Microsoft Installer engine) [not believing that TB! would need it of DP> course] and still nothing. I don't

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Marck, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:33:29 +0100 GMT (02/08/02, 18:33 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP> So, at 1KB/sec that means a .775 second overhead per message to you. MDP> That's ยค 0.000222 per message. At a hundred messages per day, this stays within affordability range for me. I

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Miguel, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:47:47 +0200 GMT (02/08/02, 18:47 +0700 GMT), Miguel A. Urech wrote: MAU> I have an even more sophisticated filter that looks for MAU> _significant_ text in messages and evaluates its length in bytes. MAU> If significant text length is less than 5% of total mes

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Gerard, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 11:52:58 +0200 GMT (02/08/02, 16:52 +0700 GMT), Gerard wrote: G> I agree on your bandwidht concern. Give me (a DUN connection user) please a little math for this "waste of bandwidth". Please compare it to ML's that don't use these headers or footers, but many u

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Erik, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:54:59 +0200 (MEST) GMT (01/08/02, 03:54 +0700 GMT), Erik Janssen wrote: TF>> Is it the job of this firewall to make attachments useless? EJ> According to the help-file of ZA it should do the following: EJ> (sorry for the gigantic message!) We might have to mo

Re: Mail Server

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Pete, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:22:16 -0600 GMT (01/08/02, 08:22 +0700 GMT), Pete Milne wrote: PM> If I am reading correctly, it is possible to use TB! as a mailserver? If PM> I decide to host my own mailserver instead of my ISP's...I can use TB!? No, TB is only an email client, not an

Re: BatPost

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Thomas, On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:37:41 +0700 GMT (01/08/02, 02:37 +0700 GMT), Thomas F. wrote: TF> The search engine doesn't list it; but I just became a member by TF> sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it worked. :-) Nonsense. I sent a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a

Re: BatPost

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Kurgan, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:53:05 -0500 GMT (31/07/02, 12:53 +0700 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KLc> Must have been a glitch; I just looked and the link is still KLc> working. :) (Either that or the search engines simply hadn't KLc> refreshed yet.) The search engine doesn't lis

Re: Corrupted MESSAGES file

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Spike, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:45:44 -0500 GMT (31/07/02, 22:45 +0700 GMT), Spike wrote: S> I am experiencing a problem with a message folder file which S> contains over 2GB of mails (with attachments) which has become S> corrupted somehow. I did the 'normal' thing when this happens S> whi

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello David, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 07:29:25 +0100 GMT (31/07/02, 13:29 +0700 GMT), David Elliott wrote: DE> User Bernd Gauweiler failed ignore test. ROTFLOL! You really *had* me laughing out loud on this one. But be fair, he didn't know that Syafril is the list admin and the test related to a li

Re: Working with a Collect Account

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Eddie, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:02:37 +0200 GMT (31/07/02, 14:02 +0700 GMT), Eddie Castelli wrote: EC> @Tom: 'gric'?? EC> That's a total new word for me. Can you explain please? Yes; see TBOT. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Sie haben ein Alkoh

Re: Firewalls compatible with The Bat. Was: Question

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Erik, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:51:11 +0200 (MEST) GMT (31/07/02, 16:51 +0700 GMT), Erik Janssen wrote: EJ> What I do remember (you are also referring to that) is some renaming EJ> of attachments (the file extentions). When I disabled the Mail-Safe EJ> settings everything worked fine at my sy

Re: BatPost

2002-07-30 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Kurgan, On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:09:27 -0500 GMT (31/07/02, 03:09 +0700 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KLc> Since BatPost has no manual or visible support, I've started a KLc> mailing list specifically for those of us trying to use it, so we KLc> can compare notes, share advice,

Re: Filtering

2002-07-30 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Michael, On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 03:07:03 +0100 GMT (31/07/02, 09:07 +0700 GMT), Michael Thompson wrote: MT> No, I am not looking to filter on a Sender / Recipient kludges (In a MT> roundabout way I suppose I am) etc, MT> just on wheather that particular mail address is listed within a MT> spe

Re: Working with a Collect Account

2002-07-30 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Eddie, On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:21:57 +0200 GMT (30/07/02, 21:21 +0700 GMT), Eddie Castelli wrote: >> As far as your sending problem is concerned, find an isp that allows >> every outgoing address as long as you connect via it's own >> connections. EC> Do you know a good one? www.myrealbox

Re: Working with a Collect Account

2002-07-30 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Eddie, On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:23:36 +0200 GMT (30/07/02, 19:23 +0700 GMT), Eddie Castelli wrote: EC> Here my two questions: EC>- How are you handling/organizing your two Account in the 'collect' EC> account? I handle all my currently 7 accounts seperately. Like you, I also have

Re: Firewalls that don't interfere with TB. Was: Question

2002-07-29 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Clive, On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 06:25:06 +0100 GMT (30/07/02, 12:25 +0700 GMT), Clive Taylor wrote: LT>> Anybody know? I don't know any way to test it, other than LT>> Steve Gibsons port prober, which says it's cool ... Tested my firewall on Norton, which says I am fine. (GRC keeps saying the

Re: Firewalls that don't interfere with TB. Was: Question

2002-07-29 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Avram, On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:01:25 -0500 GMT (30/07/02, 02:01 +0700 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Acc> Zone Alarm and Black Ice are the only firewalls that have been recommended on a Acc> law office technology list I participate in. Why are the lawyers not recommending the otehrs? Were

Re: Problem with attachments being corrupted

2002-07-29 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jason, On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:16:18 -0400 GMT (29/07/02, 23:16 +0700 GMT), Jason Gottschalk wrote: JG> He receives large attachments from a variety of people, and most of JG> them are being corrupted when they are transferred out of the bat, JG> either to the hard drive or to a viewer. So

Re: test #1, please ignore

2002-07-29 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Bernd, On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:26:25 +0100 GMT (29/07/02, 21:26 +0700 GMT), Bernd Gauweiler wrote: BG> I don't think you have a very strong argument here. BG> You're obviously not too lazy annoying everybody with your test BG> messages. There is no need to get annoyed. Syafril is the list

Re: OT - AB for spammers

2002-07-28 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jonathan, On 28 Jul 2002 10:38:50 -0500 GMT (28/07/02, 22:38 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> >> 3.) often spam letters have "X-Authentication warning" in cludges JA> I know how to show the headers/source ;) I'm just saying... I've never JA> seen it in any of the spam I have got,

Re: As if we didn't have ENOUGH problems with ISPs...

2002-07-28 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Sergey, On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 17:36:03 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 22:36 +0700 GMT), Sergey Uvarov wrote: AR>> Skipping ads at the beginning of a DVD is a technical issue. SU> But it is spam :-). I bought film, not ads :-). No, you bought a DVD, containing ads (teasers) and a movie. Without the t

Re: Font size in message list window

2002-07-28 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Joyce, On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 15:21:34 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 20:21 +0700 GMT), Joyce Sala wrote: JS> I've tried in vain to reduce the size of the font in the Message List JS> window which seems to be a _huge_ 12 or 14 point size. JS> What am I missing? Options / Message List Colours and Fon

Re: Skipping parts not interesting

2002-07-28 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Miguel, On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 08:52:53 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 13:52 +0700 GMT), Miguel A. Urech wrote: MAU> That is, assign to Ignore Colour Group (light gray), and add the MAU> subject to my Ignore filter, which marks the messages as Read and MAU> Ignored as they come in. Doesn't that add up

Re: that annyoing beep

2002-07-28 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Rick, On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 08:10:26 -0400 GMT (28/07/02, 19:10 +0700 GMT), Rick Reumann wrote: RR> For example I think myrealbox.com is down right now Excerpt from Myrealbox' message dd 19. July to all subscribers: [...] > We will therefore take the weekend of July 27 and 28 to upgrade ou

Re: Skipping parts not interesting

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Arjan, On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 03:56:08 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 08:56 +0700 GMT), Arjan de Groot wrote: AdG> I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message AdG> that is being potsted on TBUDL. No. It is the right of every subscriber, but not the duty. I read the first and may

Re: Need help with a Klez filter!

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jonathan, On 27 Jul 2002 17:21:59 -0500 GMT (28/07/02, 05:21 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA> And that'd just give the possibly infected user another email address to JA> mail the virus too ;) Not necessarily. All those who get the info about the new address will also be told the r

Re: Need help with a Klez filter!

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Kim, On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 12:40:05 -0400 GMT (27/07/02, 23:40 +0700 GMT), Kim G. Henkel wrote: KGH> Again, I'm not concerned that I'm receiving these due to a virus - the KGH> virus doesn't effect me. What is a PITA is that I get 50+ of these a day, KGH> and I am wasting a growing amount o

Re: TheBat! filtered for spam (again)

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Paula, On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:00:27 -0400 GMT (28/07/02, 00:00 +0700 GMT), PFord wrote: P> If the X-mailer value is the problem, why doen't RIT Labs just remove P> it? Isn't it optional in a header? Yes, X-Mailer is optional. All X-headers are optional, and most other MUA-generated ones a

OT: netstat (was: No Exit)

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Peter, On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:31:00 +0200 GMT (27/07/02, 20:31 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: TF>> I didn't use netstat (which is buggy anyway), PP> In which manner? PP> I think you're talking about Windows 'netstat', because I'm sure my PP> Linux 'netstat' works like it should, but

Re: TheBat! filtered for spam

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Lynn, On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 12:09:20 -0700 GMT (27/07/02, 02:09 +0700 GMT), Lynn Turriff wrote: >>> However, I never understood who (apart from spammers) would need >>> the "mass mailing feature" and am not surprised that Ritlabs >>> apparently linked to spammer sites until recently. LT> I

Re: encoded message

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Tim, On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 08:41:59 +1000 GMT (27/07/02, 05:41 +0700 GMT), Tim wrote: T> I agree, and apologise. My excuse is that I'd just moved house and T> come down with the flu simultaneously, Don't worry. Get well soon. :-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Begin

Re: No Exit

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Peter, On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 21:17:20 +0200 GMT (27/07/02, 02:17 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: PP> If a connection hangs (for _whatever_ reason, nobody could tell me PP> yet; my 'netstat' both on server and client tells: there is no PP> connection anymore) the button ain't working; so

Re: Large attachments = dead connection

2002-07-19 Thread Thomas F
Hello Ben, On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:31:38 +0100 GMT (19/07/02, 15:31 +0700 GMT), Ben Kennish wrote: TF>> No such problem here. BTW I read somewhere that the SMTP protocol was TF>> made for files of no more than 1 MB. BK> I have never heard about a 1MB limit - whereabouts did you read this? As I

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >