- there are enough ridiculous wars around without
> my help (um,
> I hope that doesn't start another discussion!)
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> CLEMENT Francis wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Message d'origine-
> >>De : Jeff
Hello Davide and list
I use Glst 0.22 from months now ..
With it, spam was reduced drasticaly without any complex filter products.
But I have a little problem : Ramdomly, some glst filters continues to run
indefinitively taking up to 99% cpu !!
This does not affect xmail delivery but I have to k
Think about DNS port 53 on UDP and TCP !
Generaly you need (basic firewalls rules) :
For Outgoing traffic :
From any local ports (>1024) to externals UDP:53, TCP:53 (DNS)
From any local ports (>1024) to external TCP port 25 (SMTP)
If you use Xmail POP3Link feature add :
From any local port
Do you have any Ip filtering products ?
(firewalls, IP filters, filtering sofware, ...)
Some have detection rules that prevent telnet like sessions on somes ports
(slow responses from telnet to 'normally' not so slow well know ports) ...
Or simple some other rules blocking ...
Francis
-M
The BIG problem is to find when to send the error or not as spammers
generaly use legitimate emails as 'From'*/'MAIL FROM' !!
The best is to use filtering tools like glst (will eliminate 90% spammers
how connect directly to your server) and then spamassassin like products to
qualify possible spa
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 12 juillet 2005 05:57
> À : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
> Objet : [xmail] Re: Glst 0.22 problem
>
>
>
..
..
>
> I have no idea ;) Maybe some locking problem in the GDBM
> library? I will
> look into i
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Harald Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 25 août 2005 08:53
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: Official 'Powered by XMail Banner' ...
>
>
>
> Too much white space on the left and the word "Server" should be
> readable. Si
Thanks Davide
I will install them ASAP
As I restarted to a 0 size glst.dbm and have no more problems (db size is
currently 1.5Mo), do you want I revert back to the saved dbm (13Mo) ?
Francis
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 25 aoû
want to know what 'xmail' is, you'd click the link anyway.
>
> Rob :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
> On
> Behalf Of Harald Schneider
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:57 PM
> To: xmail@xm
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Harald Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : vendredi 26 août 2005 09:45
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: Powered By Banner
>
>
>
> If it is beneath, it should read "empowered" or "inside" or something
> like that ..
>
Or simpl
Hello Davide
Please, correct me if i'm wrong :
On incoming mail xmail make decision to run IN filters or OUT filters on
'final' recipient local or not.
Now, suppose a local user [EMAIL PROTECTED] that have a have a mailproc.tab for
this user that redirect to multiple accounts :
2 local [EMAIL
This problem was previously reported on this mailing list.
Seems (but not completly clarified/debugged at this time) 'xmail 1.21' have
some problems with some 'domains' zones setup (hotmail and yahoo in most
cases).
Seems xmail or dns server or tcp stack ? finaly choose the domain A record
and no
As I said, I have to setup a 'no-production' server to get dns tcp dumps to
help find the problem.
At now, here are some infos :
Configuration :
XMail Server :
- Windows 2000 server SP4 + all patchs
- XMail 1.21
- XMail directed to use "SmartDNSHost" to point to DNS server
Dns Server used :
> -Message d'origine-
> De : jonn ah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 31 août 2005 10:31
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
> delivered
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> would downgrading to a previous xmail version so
As I said, xmail 1.17 (with smartDNSHost too and same microsoft dns server)
worked well.
But I will take a try asap with a test server without smartdnshost at all
(xmail doing completly the dns search from root servers)
Even if Hotmail and Yahoo are busy and slow, it does not explain the A
recor
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Rob Arends [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 1 septembre 2005 01:53
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
> delivered
>
>
>
> Francis,=20
>
> This is the exact error I have had before. I
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Rob Arends [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 1 septembre 2005 14:51
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
> delivered
>
>
>
> Francis, this also true for me:
>
> > Yes
> > The problem is EX
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Edinilson J. Santos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 1 septembre 2005 20:37
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
> delivered
>
>
>
> I'm with the same problem since 1.21 but, because we a
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Leonardo Fogel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 1 septembre 2005 23:50
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
> delivered
>
>
>
> Although yahoo.com has 4 mx records and each mx record
> has
> -Message d'origine-
> De : John Kielkopf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : vendredi 2 septembre 2005 07:47
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
> delivered
>
>
>
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >greenbaycc.org. 86400
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Edinilson J. Santos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : vendredi 2 septembre 2005 15:02
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
> delivered
>
>
..
..
..
>
> I'm discarding DNS problems.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : samedi 3 septembre 2005 19:52
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get del
> ivered
>
> There are two issues that has been reported. One is a DNS
> is
rom the same
> >>configuration, so it seems somehow related to XMail.
> >>On this issue I have found XMail to be extremely RFC
> compliant (I think
> >>that was one of Davides intentions) and it may be that MS
> SMTP is doi
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 5 septembre 2005 19:44
> À : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
> Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get del
> ivered
>
>
>
> On Mon, 5
I think you missed to create some XMail domains and/or accounts ...
Remember that XMail don't use ANY system account (except the one defined to
run xmail itself...)
Nor xmail comes with any domain (except a sample) nor xmail create any
domain based on os level computer name
Nor xmail comes with
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Ross Gohlke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : vendredi 9 septembre 2005 17:45
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: XMail + SSL patch
>
>
>
> Alas, I'm on FreeBSD! Is there Linux stunnel?
>
> PGP would protect the mail itself, but is a separa
Hello Davide
At this time, glst 'next gen' seems work with a database greater than 13Mo
(and started with a old database allready 10Mo ...)
Just a question : How to reduce the database size (remove wast space) ? Does
glst (gdbm?) do this automaticaly ? or have we to 'dump' the database then
2005 19:31
> À : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
> Objet : [xmail] Re: GLST and Win32 GDBM ...
>
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
>
> > At this time, glst 'next gen' seems work with a database
> greater than =
> > 13Mo
> >
&g
Hello Sergio
What is the current size of you glst.dbm database ?
Seems my problem is then the database becomes too big ( > 10MBytes)
Thanks
Francis
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Sergio Casagrande [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 6 octobre 2005 10:55
> À : xmail@xmailserver.
Mine is a Dell with Intel processor and Intel Chipset
So, don't think it is a 'hardware problem' (and xmail and others processes
and windows continue to run normally ... except more slowly because of glst
100%cpu ...)
Thanks
Francis
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Michal Altair Va
> I think I give up on this. With another user, we've been able
> to identify
> where the infinite loop is, and it is a condition that should
> never happen
> if the database is not corrupted. The GDBM bug list (and
> google) does not
> show any sign of such reports, and GDBM is pretty heav
Hello Davide
xmail 1.22-pre01 seems resolv in most cases the 'A ptr' use problem then mx
entries availables.
I say 'in most cases' because after first attempt with my current setup, I
needed to stop use the '"SmartDNSHost"' setting in my server.tab file to
make it work (I need to get more time
Hello Sergio
What is the current glst data base size ?
Not sure related but I had a problem with glst with base greater than
10Mbytes (on win32)...
Try this :
Save the current glst database
Delete the existing one
See if problem occurs again
Francis
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Sergio
The simple is DefaultSMTPGateways ...
The related xmail doc part for outgoing smtp auth is 'SMTP CLIENT
AUTHENTICATION'
(http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#smtp_client_authentication)
So, if I don't make mistakes (Davide correct me if I'm wrong...), here is a
example :
Suppose the isp sm
No options. If filter fail to run without returning a error code, xmail
continues as if filter returned 'ok'
And IMHO it's the best solution, as 99% filters generaly reject only a few
number of mails and if you had the option to say to xmail 'reject when any
filter don't run or timeout', you wil
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Chris L. Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 31 octobre 2005 15:03
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] the "!aex" flag
>
>
>
> Question,
>
> if "!aex" means don't run this filter if the user is Auth'ed,
Yes
> Shouldn't
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : samedi 29 octobre 2005 04:11
> À : Ladislav Sedivy
> Objet : [xmail] Re: Sending mail through my ISP
>
>
>
> Hiya!
>
> Since the docs show "cram-md5" in lower case I'd suggest doing it
> exactly as Francis
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Sönke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 2 novembre 2005 11:07
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: Failed filter
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on Wednesday, November
> 02, 2005 10:59
> AM:
>
> > My question originat
If you know the IP address of the 'spammer' (need to be fixed ip to work)
then add it to smtp.ipprop.tab with code "WhiteList=1"
This will bypass the ip checks done by xmail and then allow the incoming
smtp
Else I don't know simple setup.
At this time, we can't tell xmail that we want that [EMAI
As smtp-imap.tab takes precedence, you can't use it
First possible solution :
Use server.tab "SmtpConfig" variable setting it to "mail-auth" and ask your
mx servers to use authentication too to send to the xmail box
Second possible solution :
Create a filter.pre-data type filter that test (pseud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 8 décembre 2005 05:07
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Sending to multiple recipients
>
..
..
..
>
> The logs do not appear to give any clues.
>
For incoming smtp connexions does xmail sm
Are you sure it's legal in your country ?
I urge you to have a written query from your boss has you could be in
trouble doing this without final user knowledge !
Get in mind 'privacy' (in France, bosses can't do this even on
'professional' usage mailboxs ... only admin can read, on demand mails
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Vidmantas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 15 décembre 2005 10:07
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: hidden copy
>
>
>
> CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> > Are you sure it's legal in your country ?
Happy new year Davide and Xmail users !
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Message d'origine-
> De : garlic breath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 5 janvier 2006 09:31
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: help! spammers can still send thru my
> xmail even if
> open relay is closed!
..
..
..
> "set your local machines to send
> authenti
> -Message d'origine-
> De : garlic breath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : vendredi 6 janvier 2006 05:56
> À : xmail@xmailserver.org
> Objet : [xmail] Re: help! spammers can still send thru my
> xmail even if
> open relay is closed!
>
>
> >
> >
> > So don't put 192.168.x in s
As you explained, the mail route from exchange to final server is :
Exchange -> ASSP proxy -> clamSMTP -> XMail -> Internet
And the 'normal' bounce back route from Xmail is :
XMail -> Internet or Exchange with smtprelay in cmdalias
As show in your last exemple, more than one bounce is send f
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Erwin Meulensteen
>Envoyé : jeudi 26 janvier 2006 13:18
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] xmail vs sendmail
>
>
>
>Thanks for all the tips on Imap.
>Don't have it working yet, bet I'm getting ther
Do you mean that some mail never hit filters.in and filters.out ?
I never verified this ...
Do you have explicit samples routes in xmail for your 'in house' route ?
(how the mail comes in xmail, is there any mailproc file or custom file to
be processed and what commands in them, where xmail fina
You have the option to install another instance of xmail on the same server
(different ip) just for these customers domains and clear CustMapList on it
:-)
Francis
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Filip Supera
>Envoyé : lundi 6 février
gzippd tarbals can be open with this tools (current version)
(and for many, with very old versions too ) :
7zip
unzip
powerarchiver
winzip
winrar
..
..
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
>Envoyé : mercredi 15 février 2006 04
Davide is true for Unzip :) remove from the list !
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de CLEMENT Francis
>Envoyé : mercredi 15 février 2006 10:41
>À : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
>Objet : [xmail] Re: glst tarbal
To reduce CustMapsList processing time, you can, with most of 'big
blacklist' mainteners (spamcop, rbl, ..) do local a mirror for the zones in
a local dns server, so you could reduce dns traffic dramaticaly and
custmaplist response time by saying xmail to use the local dns server.
Note that I ne
Hello Davide and list
I don't know if i reported this problem before so excuse me if allready
done.
On my xmail 1.22 (w2k sp4 win32 platform) I noticed the following symptom :
When a mail is send to an external 'TO' address (not handled by xmail) and
the 'TO' address is syntaxicaly bad in the d
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
>Envoyé : vendredi 17 février 2006 19:14
>À : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Xmail 1.22 retries on 'bad' email addresses !
>
&
After the thread related to "Xmail 1.22 retries on 'bad' email addresses !"
(in fact syntax error on domain fqdn in recipent email address) we conducted
a survey to our xmail servers to potential mail delay, mail lost,
configuration problem,
At this time, we discovered another 'strange' thin
I think smtp filters are currently triggered once for all rcpt, not for each
rcpt !
If actual smtp filters are triggering "per rcpt", it could be a great option
here too to have per 'allrcpt'
It should be a option on "per filter" (like "!eax" in smtp pre-data) to have
more granularity
So it co
GLST is very simple to install, even on win32
If you put all glst files (minimum are glst.exe and glst.conf) in
{GLSTDIRFULLPATH}
and have XMAIL root directory in {XMAILROOTFULLPATH},
to setup glst for xmail you need to :
1 - Customize
{GLSTDIRFULLPATH}\glst.conf
2 - Put in xmail file
{XMAILR
After reading RFC 2476, not at this time on many parts of rfc but you can
use smtp in filters to add some of the rfc functionnalities til xmail
implements them in code (like email syntax check, fqdn check, reject etrn on
submission port, add missing headers, confirm valid sender, ...) .
Francis
Hello Michal
To avoid any problems with glst (100% cpu usage on growing db, db corrupted,
) I use a scheduled batch script (once a day) to maintain xmail related
tools (av updated, glst maintenance, ...).
The glst batch look like this (GlstCleanUp.cmd) :
>>---
@echo o
Hello XMail'ers and Davide
Our xmail server configuration : W2000 Server SP4, Xmail 1.22 W32, Davide
glst, Henry avfilterpd (post-data scan), and no 'runtime' av scanner
activated
Some customers complains about no delivery of some incoming mails to our
server (even if mail comes from external or
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
>Envoyé : jeudi 18 mai 2006 07:59
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Local delivery and smail log question
>
>
>
>On Tue, 16 May 2006
Hello Davide
I restart here the various 'dns problems' for smtp delivery from xmail since
I have more and more complains about users saying our server is 'bad'
Configuration used :
Xmail 1.22 Win32 on Windows 2000 SP4
Xmail configured to directly resolve mx queries (no smartdnshost)
Local w
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Francesco Vertova
>Envoyé : lundi 22 mai 2006 13:16
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: xmail DNS problem : First sample
>
>
>
>At 12.30 22/05/06, you wrote:
>
>>First problem : Use of A domain
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rob Arends
>Envoyé : lundi 22 mai 2006 14:35
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: xmail DNS problem : First sample
>
>I am currently running 1.22 on Win2kSP4 - same as Francis.
>I also have in SE
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
>Envoyé : dimanche 28 mai 2006 18:17
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: xmail DNS problem : First sample
>
>
>
>On Sun, 28 May 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
>
>> So Davide, can you exp
I think this normal if you set 'list.dsbl.org:0' (:0 mode) in the
"CustMapsList"
(the connection is kept alive but only authenticated users can send mail )
So you permit xmail to wait for a possible authentication command (login,
) from the client after the helo/ehlo stage, and if the client
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dmitry
>Envoyé : jeudi 1 juin 2006 13:25
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] question about greetings
>
>
>
>
>Hi :)
>
>My mail server's greeting is look like that:
> 220 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [XMail
Not sure, as I didn't read the sources, but no way to put comments, doc
don't say nothing about them.
What I do now is working only on a copy as source file with comments (#) and
before overwriting glst.conf file, delete any lines beginning with '#'
(a macro can do the job)
I think adding '
>-Message d'origine-
>De?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Gideon So
>Envoye?: jeudi 15 juin 2006 03:55
>A?: xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet?: [xmail] Re: mail() function and smtp relay settings
>
>
>
>Hi David,
>
>drwx-- root root spool
>drwx-- root root sp
Cool ! No need to patch !
Thanks Jorn
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jorn Hass
>Envoyé : jeudi 15 juin 2006 10:04
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Comments in glst.conf
>
>
>
>Yes, glst allows for just that...
>Extract fr
Simple way is to share the same base for the two servers.
Primary xmail server with glst database and it shares (nfs, ...) the glst
directory on secure backoffice network (or with ssl/stunnel/vpn, ...)
Secondary xmail server glst points to this share.
Don't ask me about reliability and possible
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
>Envoyé : samedi 17 juin 2006 18:20
>À : 'xmail@xmailserver.org '
>Objet : [xmail] Re: GLST on secondary server
>
>
>
>On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, CL
Davide
I have just a question about the greeting and md5 challenge :
When doing a dnsreports.com on one of my domains, on 'Mail server host name
in greeting' test, dnsreports says :
WARNING: One or more of your mailservers is claiming to be a host other than
what it really is (the
As the final display of variables is dependent of the renderer, you can
choose encoding and charset you like.
But I think using a quoted printable encoding with unicode charset could be
the best choice (both are universal and many languages and tools handle them
well)
Francis
>-Message d'or
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Helio Cavichiolo Jr
>Envoyé : vendredi 21 juillet 2006 23:01
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] postmaster messages
>
>
>
>Is it possible to set xmail to send error messages to
>appropriate domain.
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Ladislav Sedivy
>Envoyé : samedi 22 juillet 2006 16:15
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Auth in SMTPFWD.TAB
>
>
>
>Hello all,
>Is there a way to specify authentication in SMTPFWD.TAB file?
>
>Than
When doing pop3 from a MUA (user software used to 'pop3' mails from the
server) the final destination of the 'poped' mails is the responsability of
the MUA.
Xmail /domains/... is the temporary location where xmail stores
the mails received via smtp and waiting for a pop3 MUA to retrieve them, not
But where it is
>getting stored =
>on the linux host isn't known?
>
>I didn't try the 'pop3links' xmail feature, but there must be
>some way =
>out to resolve this through the xmail files configuration.
>
>Many Thanks,=20
>Sachin
>
>-Origina
Sorry for this mail, but we had some connectivity problems last days.
Just to see if I'm allways subscribed !
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message t
Well, you use a 2.6.x kernel, good !
But this unique info is not suffisant to help you accuratly ...
Please, can you tell us the exact linux distribution you are using with
exact distrib version ?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: 10/1/06
Don't know 'in-spamblock.sh' ...
Any package name or link to the source web site ?
As xmail doesn't do 'content filtering' itself, the returned error is only
generated by the filter, so you need to ask for help to the
'in-spamblock.sh' author ;)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMA
Simple way, with no additional software (only in the windows box tools) :
At time of link full :
- in cmd line : "Netstat -a -n", to get list of currently open tcp
connections (find connections to port 110)
- using xmail pop3 log file, get the corresponding connected users
- check the mailbox
I had the same problem when changing some old scsi servers with new sata
servers
Solution we found : "Come back to scsi" :)
At low or medium price, Sata components (controlers and disks) are just good
for very small servers or medium professional workstations ...
You will never get the same perf
Hello
This post is not directly xmail or glst related, but I don't know where to
post at this time for informations.
Trying to use the content of glst-lame.dbm to generate some local blacklist,
i noticed that some entries indicate 192.168 private network !
As my internal network don't use this
Hello Edinilson
You need some tools like "Process Viewer" included in Windows 2000 (or 2003)
Support Tools available on the original CD, in the \support\tools directory
(launch the .msi file to setup)
W2000 SP4 :
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=f08d28f3-b835-4847-
b810-b
erver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: how many threads
How about just launch task manager, and choose View > Select Columns >
Thread Count :)
- Original Message -
From: "CLEMENT Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 8:23 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: how
>On Tuesday 24 October 2006 15:22, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > This post is not directly xmail or glst related, but I don't know where
>> > to post at this time for informations.
>&
The program used on the other side to do the 'reverse check' is simple not
RFC compliant :)
(Does the 'reverse check' an integrated Exim fonctionnality or an add-on ? I
don't know ...)
The exact RFC "mail from" syntax IS : MAIL FROM:
IMOO, changing xmail to accept no rfc compliant programms is
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de decker
>Envoyé : lundi 30 octobre 2006 12:41
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Email address reverse check
>
>
>
>Hellos,
>
>I'm on a different comp than usual so I may be off here since I'm
I agree with Davide
RFC not only apply to MTA but to MUA too and to final users too (programs or
humans) :)
As the MUA interacts with the user, it's to the MUA responsibility to
correct the user (automaticaly or not) if users can't be made RFC compliant
( hard to achieve :) ).
Francis
>-M
Me too :)
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
>Envoyé : lundi 30 octobre 2006 19:21
>À : XMail mailing list
>Objet : [xmail] Poll ...
>
>
>
>
>How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
>
>
>
>- Davide
>
>
>-
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Helio Cavichiolo Jr
>Envoyé : lundi 6 novembre 2006 22:53
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Copying messages
>
>
>
>Em Segunda 06 Novembro 2006 18:08, Davide Libenzi escreveu:
>> Ask CIA. This
Do you use another auth method with xmail ?
To remove 'Plain text' the response seems to be only in the source code by
remove sending 'LOGIN' when in a smtp session response and recompile.
Francis
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de David
With this setting ( ':0' ending each rbl entry), incoming connections are
closed with a smtp error code IF next two commands sends by client are not
HELO/EHLO and immediatly followed by a AUTH command to authenticate the
client.
There is no 'bounce' mail generated by xmail for CustMapList.
Fran
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: xmail@xmailserver.org
>Sent: 11/13/06 10:14 PM
>Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages
>> If the filter removed the message file, how do you plan to recover
>>from that? :)
>You don't - but a good MTA should *log* abnormal situations - like
Create dummy accounts in your xmail server (on a dummy domain like
relay.relay), one account for each sending server, then disable pop3 for
them (user.tab file setting)
Send your customers they respective login (syntax : [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and
password and ask them to use SMTP Authentication when
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
>Envoyé : jeudi 18 janvier 2007 18:55
>À : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: wlex doubt
>
>
>
>On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Filip Supera wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In smtp.ipprop.tab, I ha
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
>On Behalf Of CLEMENT Francis
>Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:10
>To: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
>Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail acting as a smarthost for dynamic IP's
>
>
>Create dummy accounts in your xmail server (
DNS support in xmail on xmail(2).
>
>
>Rob :-)
>=20
>_
>Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
>=20
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
>On
>Behalf
101 - 200 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
