Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
Hi I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct and for which routing protocols can I do it. Thanks for the help Pieter Jordaan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19232t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
Hi, Can you specify why your book state you cannot do so? Under what situation? Regards, Fanglo Phantom wrote: Hi I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct and for which routing protocols can I do it. Thanks for the help Pieter Jordaan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19233t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
Hi Neither books give any details as to why you would do it. The one says you can if you want (may in situations where you are using fram relay. The other book says you can't disable it at all (ever). Thanks Fanglo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Can you specify why your book state you cannot do so? Under what situation? Regards, Fanglo Phantom wrote: Hi I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct and for which routing protocols can I do it. Thanks for the help Pieter Jordaan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19234t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All-In-One, Lab #43, BGP path selection [7:19182]
yes. The network statement that the authors used for OSPF would include that interface, so they decided that prevent RouterB and RouterC from sending updates to RouterA by issuing a passive-inteface statement. Think about why they did that - one reason they did that is because RouterA is in a different BGP autonomous system, and one typically prevents IGP updates from going out to an EBGP neighbor. The network from ser0/0 still needs to be advertised out ser0/1 (within the same BGP AS), hence its inclusion in the OSPF process. - Original Message - From: Alex Lee To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:31 AM Subject: Re: All-In-One, Lab #43, BGP path selection [7:19182] Group, There is a 'passive-interface Serial0/0' subcommand under 'router ospf 64' on both RouterB and RouterC. When I do a 'sh ip ospf int s0', I can see something like 'No Hellos '. Am I correct to assume that this 'passive-int serial0/0' is configured to prevent RouterB and RouterC from sending Hello packets out of their Serial0/0 interface to RouterA ? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19235t=19182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OffTopic: Cable Operators [7:19236]
Hi all, Is there anyone who works for a cable multiservice operator that use Cisco equipment? If you are the one, please reply to me in private please. Thanks, __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19236t=19236 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
you can't disable split horizon for IPX RIP. Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19237t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
For Cisco, the only IPX routing protocol that allows disabling of split-horizon is eigrp. See (watch URL wrap) http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/33.html for that and other IPX case studies, and search for split-horizon in the text for your specific issue. The solution given by Cisco is to use point-to-point sub-interfaces if using IPX RIP to work around the IPX split-horizon issue. - Original Message - From: Phantom To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:06 AM Subject: Re: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232] Hi Neither books give any details as to why you would do it. The one says you can if you want (may in situations where you are using fram relay. The other book says you can't disable it at all (ever). Thanks Fanglo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Can you specify why your book state you cannot do so? Under what situation? Regards, Fanglo Phantom wrote: Hi I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct and for which routing protocols can I do it. Thanks for the help Pieter Jordaan _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19238t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX OID [7:19241]
Hi group, We are currently using the MRTG tool to monitor our Internet Access. This tool has help us take decision regarding the upgrade of our link to the Internet. Behind our router's we have Cisco PIX Firewall. We would like to monitor the number of connections made trought our PIX with MRTG. Can you please indicate me the correct ObjectID in order to monitor the number of connections/s made trought the PIX. Any information regarding other ObjectIDs, for the cisco PIX, that we should monitor in order to determine the usage is welcome. Thank you group Rock BASSOLE Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19241t=19241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QUERY ON IPX WAN [7:19242]
Hi all, need help, does any one know how to ensure that physical interface on FR connection has been point to point..? I can't find out. I was only able if I am using FR sub interface point to point. thanks Grad _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19242t=19242 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Renting equipment [7:18766]
same here, my time is Sunday 9/23, 6:00 pm-11:25 pm PDT. If anyone wants to share it with me (for free), please reply off-list. I just want about 3 hours with it to work on voice configurations (to make sure that mine will work). - Original Message - From: McMasters, Eric To: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:03 AM Subject: RE: Renting equipment [7:18766] Actually I books a block of time for Monday (9/10) yesterday morning after I read Mark's original email. A couple of minutes later I received confirmation and I'm all set for Monday. That's just what happened for me though. :- Hope everyone has a great weekend! GO CHIEFS!!! Eric -Original Message- From: Jkillion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Renting equipment [7:18766] Actually, the free lab days have been booked for some time now. Mark Bramblett wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... www.bfq.com for the next month they have this equipment and you can use it for free,plus lots more. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19244t=18766 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router as name server?? [7:19146]
I believe only the Distributed Director (4700-M), and most probably Cat6k and 7200 running SLB, can act as a DNS server. IMHO CM - Original Message - From: Ednilson Rosa To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 2:40 AM Subject: Router as name server?? [7:19146] Hi List! Is there any way of making a router act as a name server for the host names that are configured on it by the ip host command?? I would like to enter the hostnames of all routers of a network only on the central router and have it resolve the names for the other routers, instead of having to enter the ip host commands in every router or using a real dns server. Is that possible?? Regards, ER Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19245t=19146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
feedback on a configuration [7:19246]
hello everybody, please provide your feedback on the following configuration sent to me by a client i know some of the faults in it but i would like to hear more.. the ips are changed..for security ! ip subnet-zero no ip source-route no ip domain-lookup ! no ip bootp server ip inspect audit-trail ip inspect max-incomplete high 1100 ip inspect one-minute high 1100 ip inspect tcp max-incomplete host 50 block-time 10 ip inspect name Ethernet_0 tcp ip inspect name Ethernet_0 udp ip inspect name Ethernet_0 ftp ip inspect name Ethernet_0 h323 ip inspect name Ethernet_0 cuseeme ip inspect name Ethernet_0 realaudio ip inspect name Ethernet_0 smtp ip inspect name Ethernet_0 streamworks ip inspect name Ethernet_0 vdolive ip inspect name Serial_0 tcp ip inspect name Serial_0 udp ip inspect name Serial_0 ftp ip inspect name Serial_0 h323 ip inspect name Serial_0 cuseeme ip inspect name Serial_0 realaudio ip inspect name Serial_0 smtp ip inspect name Serial_0 streamworks ip inspect name Serial_0 vdolive isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 214.170.253.33 255.255.255.224 secondary ip address 214.170.253.1 255.255.255.224 ip access-group 100 in no ip redirects no ip unreachables ip inspect Ethernet_0 in no cdp enable hold-queue 100 in hold-queue 100 out ! interface Serial0 no ip address shutdown no cdp enable ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown no cdp enable ! interface BRI0 description connected to Internet ip unnumbered Ethernet0 ip access-group 101 in no ip redirects no ip unreachables ip inspect Serial_0 in encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache dialer idle-timeout 2147483 dialer string 400 dialer hold-queue 100 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap callin ppp chap hostname kspc-0012 ppp chap password 7 130607010F01 hold-queue 100 in hold-queue 100 out ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 BRI0 no ip http server ! no logging trap access-list 100 permit tcp host 214.170.253.4 any access-list 100 permit udp host 214.170.253.4 any access-list 100 permit udp host 214.170.253.47 host 194.170.1.6 eq doma access-list 100 permit udp host 214.170.253.47 host 194.170.1.7 eq doma access-list 100 permit udp host 214.170.253.48 host 194.170.1.6 eq doma access-list 100 permit udp host 214.170.253.48 host 194.170.1.7 eq doma access-list 100 permit tcp host 214.170.253.47 any eq smtp access-list 100 permit tcp host 214.170.253.10 any access-list 100 permit tcp host 214.170.253.50 any access-list 100 deny icmp any any redirect access-list 100 deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any access-list 100 deny ip 224.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 any access-list 100 deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any access-list 101 deny ip 214.170.253.0 0.0.0.127 any log-input access-list 101 permit tcp any host 214.170.253.47 eq smtp access-list 101 permit tcp any host 214.170.253.47 eq pop3 access-list 101 permit tcp any host 214.170.253.47 eq domain access-list 101 permit tcp any host 214.170.253.48 eq smtp access-list 101 permit tcp any host 214.170.253.48 eq pop3 access-list 101 permit tcp any host 214.170.253.47 eq 143 access-list 101 permit tcp any host 214.170.253.10 eq www access-list 101 permit tcp any host 214.170.253.50 eq 3389 access-list 101 permit udp any 214.170.253.0 0.0.0.127 eq domain access-list 101 deny icmp any any redirect access-list 101 deny ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip 224.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip host 0.0.0.0 any dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 1 protocol ipx permit no cdp run ! line con 0 password 7 060B0B32455A line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password 7 060B0B32455A login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19246t=19246 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: web pages not loading (from certain networks) but not a [7:19247]
This is a question which is probably a little off topic, and probably not relevant to the question, but I've been wondering about it for a while (minutes anyway). We had a similar problem although fairly localised that certain users within a network could not access certain web servers. Turned out to be the 'Do not Fragment' bit set on the server, and the traffic was being passed over a Triple DES link which pushed the packet size over the default MTU of 1500. I changed the encapsulation to PPP and upped the MTU to get over it. These same users are accessing the internet over the same link, with no problems, so I take it that setting the 'Do not Fragment' bit is not a regular thing? So after all that prattle, the question is: What is the reason for setting the 'Do not Fragment' bit? I remember reading somewhere that later versions of IOS have a setting which basically ignores this bit, but why set it on the server if it is OK to ignore it. Cheers, Gaz Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In answer to this puzzle, the consensus on NANOG was that the problem may be related to an MTU mismatch. A couple of folks keyed in on DSL and the described symptom, and noted that there have been similar problems caused by MTU issues within the DSLAMS used by the carriers noted in the message below. As of this writing, the guy who asked the question has not reported any further information. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: web pages not loading (from certain networks) but not a [7:19074] Saw this one on NANOG today. Any of you troubleshooting gurus want to take a crack? ( BTW, I believe I saw this problem myself today. OTOH, my issue could have been related to that stupid proxy my employer now makes me use. ;- ) I'll post the answer the NANOG folks suggested later this weekend. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nanog Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: web pages not loading (from certain networks) but not a routing issue. Ok guys, Interesting problem that seems to have started on Friday. Here's the deal, it seems that certain (not all) web pages on various sites we host are not loading for certain customers. It started on Friday with visitors on Verizon DSL waiting forever for pages to load. Yesterday and today PacBell DSL and some Netcom customers started complaining. This only seems to occur on HTTP traffic. If we have the visitors try HTTPS the pages load fine (with the normal encryption slowdown). We've looked at Layers 1-4, and can't see any problems, ping looks great, interfaces and cpus on routers, servers and switches look fine. It's almost like it's a transparent cache bug. Anyone know if Inktomi, or any major cache vendors rolled out any new code this week? For that matter does anyone know what caches Verizon and SBC use for starters? Other variables: it only seems to occur on IIS based systems (I know I know, no flame wars or suggestions for replacements). Although it's not happening on all of our IIS servers. Any clues are greatly appreciated. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19247t=19247 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TCP seq changed when cross Cisco PIX 525 [7:18764]
Hi I think you misunderstood me. 1. I'm worried about hackers like all other people in the world. 2. Described software not of such type, because it is not really opens TCP connection tube. a) TCP on machine that running software is not aware about sent SYN frames, therefore any attack related on my sequence number will have same effect as any other attack with random sequence number. b) TCP on target machine, is in SYN/RECVD state, i.e. also useless, relative to my software, for attacker, It can easy put it to same state. actually a thing that I did for it, sent SYN packet, that any kid can construct with any IP address and any seq number. Any way thank you for notice. Toly -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 11:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP seq changed when cross Cisco PIX 525 [7:18764] At 09:30 AM 9/9/01, Anatoly Shein wrote: Hi I'm not worried about hackers, the sending probe machine is not configured to You're different from the rest of the world then. receive any packet of this port. Actually probe is not sent via TCP stack, but using raw socket Therefore any hackers attempt to sent me packet will be answered with RST frame. Not if you're under attach and are unable to send a RST. Also I don't see any disadvantages of seq=1, it is easy to guess what is the next seq number Well, the rest of the world, especially security experts, see a disadvantage with seq = 1. also if you start from 342353122, for example. seq can be easy computed as seq next = seq + len + ( ( SYN | FIN ) flags ) ? 1 : 0; Am I wrong ? The problem occurs where the hacker doesn't actually see the first frame and has no idea what the sequence number is but is still able to send a reply that looks legitimate. It's documented in most security explanations. Do some research. Check descriptions of IP spoofing. I did a search on Google and immediately found this article that looks pretty good: http://www.fc.net/phrack/files/p48/p48-14.html Priscilla toly -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP seq changed when cross Cisco PIX 525 [7:18764] Always starting with TCP sequence number 1 is a bad thing. It makes it easy for a hacker to guess what the sequence number is and insert himself into a connection establishment. So PIX and other firewalls let you randomize the starting sequence number for TCP implementations that don't already do this. Priscilla At 02:48 AM 9/6/01, Anatoly Shein wrote: Hi I was encountered with strange situation. Probably one of your can help/heard about something alike. Problem description: There is sun machine connected to pair of Cisco PIX 525 On sun there is software sent TCP SYN probe packets with sequence number starts from 1 and increments for each packet. packets sent 1 for 50 mili seconds When packet cross router the sequence number is changed. This change is consistent for one set of packets but is not for subsequent set of packets for example : before ciscoafter cisco 1. TCP syn seq = 1 seq = 1 + x 2. TCP syn seq = 2 seq = 2 + x 3. TCP syn seq = 3 seq = 3 + x FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19248t=18764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Security Exam [7:19249]
Hi, This has been a great Cisco study site and enjoy most of it for the abundant of info that is shared on the discussion. Currently I am preparing for the Cisco Security Track and seeking some advise. I had been to Cisco site and there seems to have 4 exams to pass: 1) MCNS 2) Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced (CSPFA) 3) Cisco Secure Intrusion Detention System (CSIDS) 4) Cisco Secure VPN (CSVPN) Question is that must I pass the above exams? Need some confirmation on this Next I would appreciate greatly if anyone can recommend me the books to read up for each of the exam. Thank you very much have a nice day. With regards Steven Quek Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd Professional Service Main: 65-786 2288 DID: 65-580 5176 Mobile: 65-9797 4526 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19249t=19249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Security Exam [7:19249]
Hi Steven To do the full Cisco Security thing you must take 5 exams as follows and preferably in this order MCNS Pix Firewall Fundamentals Pix Firewall Advanced Cisco Secure VPN Cisco Intrusion Detection The reason for this approach as I always tell my staff students is that the MCNS is comprehensive and gives you a great deal of material in the other exams, especially the area of IKE, IPsec, ISAKMP etc. Books Cisco Press Managing Cisco Network Security Designing Network Security Cisco IOS 12.0 Network Security Cisco Secure Internet Security Solutions There is also the McGraw Hill Implementing Cisco Secure VPN's but that is so full of holes and errors I would not bother. There is a book from cisco Press on VPN's due late 2001 written by Andrew Mason Terri Smith and if it is half as good as Terri is as a VPN course instructor then it will be well worth the money. The odd one out is CSIDS which requires a deal of Unix knowledge especially Solaris, plus some Openview stuff. The key to all the exams is understand fully IKE, ISAkmp and the security process of why how. If you have not done CCNP or the BCRAN part of CCNPO then i wopuld recommend you take a look at it as background to the IOS side of security. Good luck and if you need any further specific info email me direct. Quek, Steven wrote: Hi, This has been a great Cisco study site and enjoy most of it for the abundant of info that is shared on the discussion. Currently I am preparing for the Cisco Security Track and seeking some advise. I had been to Cisco site and there seems to have 4 exams to pass: 1) MCNS 2) Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced (CSPFA) 3) Cisco Secure Intrusion Detention System (CSIDS) 4) Cisco Secure VPN (CSVPN) Question is that must I pass the above exams? Need some confirmation on this Next I would appreciate greatly if anyone can recommend me the books to read up for each of the exam. Thank you very much have a nice day. With regards Steven Quek Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd Professional Service Main: 65-786 2288 DID: 65-580 5176 Mobile: 65-9797 4526 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19250t=19249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Security Exam [7:19249]
Exam for PIX firewall Fundamentals has expired as on July 2nd 2001 ,ie test no : 9EO-559 , do check it up ,the training courseis still there from Cisco FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Len Lee/CHI/NTRS is out of the office. [7:19252]
I will be out of the office starting September 10, 2001 and will not return until September 14, 2001. I will respond to your message when I return. If this is an emergency, please call me on my cell-phone 312-352-0035 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19252t=19252 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Load Sharing vs Load Balance [7:18821]
Hi Dennis, The site below explains how to implement load sharing using BGP. Bcos of the very nature of BGP you can have one best route anad hence u can implement load sharing and not load balancing. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/40.html THanks Naresh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19254t=18821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
This is only for IPX RIP. Rob H. NP, DP, blah,blah,blah. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19255t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VERY Inexpensive DRAM for 2500 Series Routers! [7:19185]
I referrred to Chuck Senior because of his elder knowledge and because I've learned that he is a closet AARP member!! Greg M. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EA Louie Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VERY Inexpensive DRAM for 2500 Series Routers! [7:19185] I passed this subject by the Paul B., the List Moderator Chuck L. (Sr. List Guru!) before posting this and have their OK to go forward. So don't waste BW by flaming me! geez, Chuck... how Sr. ARE you??? ;-) and Greg, thanks for the info re: 2500 memory _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19257t=19185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX OID [7:19241]
A search on google.com for +pix +mrtg brought me here: http://www.hcity.net/~nomad/pix.html - Original Message - From: BASSOLE Rock To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:19 AM Subject: PIX OID [7:19241] Hi group, We are currently using the MRTG tool to monitor our Internet Access. This tool has help us take decision regarding the upgrade of our link to the Internet. Behind our router's we have Cisco PIX Firewall. We would like to monitor the number of connections made trought our PIX with MRTG. Can you please indicate me the correct ObjectID in order to monitor the number of connections/s made trought the PIX. Any information regarding other ObjectIDs, for the cisco PIX, that we should monitor in order to determine the usage is welcome. Thank you group Rock BASSOLE Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19258t=19241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Security Exam [7:19249]
Last year, passing MCNS gave you a specialization in security if you had your CCNP or CCDP but since has changed and you must pass all the exams.. Last year I belive only the MCNS book was available to buy but since the exam format has changed, they are releasing more books.. I guess they found out that not everyone can go take all those classes... http://www.ciscopress.com/book.cfm?book=196 http://www.ciscopress.com/book.cfm?series=1book=82 http://www.ciscopress.com/book.cfm?series=1book=170 http://www.ciscopress.com/book.cfm?series=1book=79 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19259t=19249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written [7:19260]
I passed my CCIE written on Friday with an 810. Thanks to everybody on the list that has helped. I would like to especially thank Dennis Laganiere and the guys at Network Learning Inc. (aka ccbootcamp). I used all of the books mentioned before on the list along with the CCIE written class that ccbootcamp.com put on. Every one there was very professional and I appreciate the extra time they spent with me and the others to really nail down the concepts I had troubles with. I don't know if they are planning on doing another CCIE written class, but I would highly recommend them to train you if they do. On to the real challenge of the lab. Jeremy Wright Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19260t=19260 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX OID [7:19241]
Try searching http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr =safe=offgroup=comp.dcom.net-management I'm pretty certain it has come up before. H.T.H. Dom Stocqueler BASSOLE RockTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX OID [7:19241] Sent by: nobody@groups tudy.com 10/09/2001 09:19 Please respond to BASSOLE Rock Hi group, We are currently using the MRTG tool to monitor our Internet Access. This tool has help us take decision regarding the upgrade of our link to the Internet. Behind our router's we have Cisco PIX Firewall. We would like to monitor the number of connections made trought our PIX with MRTG. Can you please indicate me the correct ObjectID in order to monitor the number of connections/s made trought the PIX. Any information regarding other ObjectIDs, for the cisco PIX, that we should monitor in order to determine the usage is welcome. Thank you group Rock BASSOLE Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19261t=19241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written [7:19260]
Congratulations. -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP, CQS-SNA/IPSS Wright, Jeremy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I passed my CCIE written on Friday with an 810. Thanks to everybody on the list that has helped. I would like to especially thank Dennis Laganiere and the guys at Network Learning Inc. (aka ccbootcamp). I used all of the books mentioned before on the list along with the CCIE written class that ccbootcamp.com put on. Every one there was very professional and I appreciate the extra time they spent with me and the others to really nail down the concepts I had troubles with. I don't know if they are planning on doing another CCIE written class, but I would highly recommend them to train you if they do. On to the real challenge of the lab. Jeremy Wright Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19262t=19260 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158]
The answer to this is defintitely no. Cisco Nuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... That's pretty coolFree TACACS server !!! I have configured TACACS before and yes we did have to put a login local option should the tacacs server fail. I was just playing around with the privilege command. Thanks for your help. I have a Unix box at work. Can I download the tacacs software on it, compile it and then use it on a NT 4.0 box? Any instructions/directions that you can provide is highly appreciated. From: Sean Young Reply-To: Sean Young To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 11:07:08 -0400 Don't mess around with privilege level command. Jeff is correct is that you should build yourself a TACACS server (after all, it is free). Another thing, Authorization, does it ring a bell? Even with TACACS, one of the complaint that I've heard about customers is that somehow, if the router can NOT reach TACACS server, somehow you will have to configure local authorization (i.e. on the router) for this to work. If the router can reach TACACS server, authorization on TACACS server can provide very fine granular control over what a user can/can't do. Download the TACACS source code from Cisco website and compile it on a UNIX box and you will have a TACACS server to play with. It is very simple. From: Jeff Chambers Reply-To: Jeff Chambers To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 02:00:50 -0400 You can reset a command to its normal priv level using the format privilege exec reset put_the_entire_command_here Configuring privilege levels for commands on a router can be very frustrating. It also doesn't scale well in a medium to large network. The best production method I have found is to use TACACS. You can assign all users privilege level 15 and allow or deny commands at the user or group level. In my testing (it has been 9 months or so, this may have changed), the user must be at privilege level 15 in order to receive valid output from the show running-configuration command. It will return a blank configuration if the user is not at privilege level 15. Jeff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 12:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Privilege Level command driving me nuts!! [7:19158] Hi,I am trying to configure privilege exec level commands on my router but am going nuts at the output of these commands:Basically, here is what I have configured:#enable secret level 3 cisco! #privilege exec level 3 ping#privilege exec level 3 traceroute#privilege exec level 3 show ip route#privilege exec level 3 show startup-configuration#privilege exex level 3 show running-configuration!# When I do a log in using enable secret level 3, I can get the output of the #sh star command but not of the #sh ru command?Also, when I do a sh ru on the router using regular privilege level(15), I see 2 additional commands automatically configured for me:#privilege exec level 1 show#privilege exec level 1 show ip It will NOT let me remove these 2 commands nor will it let me change this to privilege level 3.Nor will it let me remove any individual commands!!What's going on? Any ideas? Thank you for your help.Kind regards.Nuts!! Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19265t=19158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:18843]
Yeah - Original Message - From: Leigh Anne Chisholm To: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:59 PM Subject: RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:18843] Actually, it's likely the lawyer fresh out of lawschool will do a better job than the cratchety old lawyer that's had a few years to become jaded by the system or to get an over-inflated view of themselves. The new kid on the block has something to prove so he'll go that extra mile to do a superb job. Did I mention I used to head up an IT division at a major Canadian law firm? (-: My point is... experience doesn't always matter. Brilliance and the willingness to do a good job can compensate quite well for experience. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:18843] hey, Brad, aren't you the guy who was complaining on the other list about what the one day lab would end up doing? ;- may I point out that the CPA or the State Bar, or the real estate broker's exam, for that matter, are very difficult, and only a small percentage of takers pass first time through. So who do you want doing your taxes - the guy fresh out of accounting school, or the guy with a few years experience? How about if you find yourself in court for one reason or another? Want that lawyer fresh out of law school who happened to pass the bar first try through? Hey - he's smart enough! Isn't he? and for those wondering, I deliberately avoided using real estate broker examples because the house its up for sale, and I don't care about credentials, just as long as I get my price. Any CCIE's out there want to come live in California? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brad Ellis Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:18843] Chuck, Hi! Don't get me wrong, Im not saying CCIE's sh*t don't stink!!! I know a few CCIEs that I would let touch my network. However, I consider that the EXCEPTION and not the RULE. As a general rule of thumb, I consider the CCIE level of knowledge and applicable skills to be higher than minimal competence. I suppose it really depends on your definition of minimal competence. I define minimal competence as someone who has a fundamental understanding of networking with a small amount of hands-on experience. I would generally classify a CCIE to have a more in-depth understanding of networking fundamentals and quite a bit more hands-on experience than someone with minimal competence. Mr. Seltzer's writing says that the average CCIE is minimally competent in the product (I'd guess he was referring to Cisco). I think that's like saying NBA basketball players are minimally competent basketball players. To Michael Jordan that's probably true, but Im sure the general public would disagree. I suppose it really comes down to your definition of minimal competence. I have a great deal of respect for the majority of other CCIE's who I have come in contact with and consider calling them minimally competent to be an insult. -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... like everything else in this business, the answer is it depends. sorry folks, but CCIE's are not gods who walk among us. I personally know several CCIE's who are top notch and deserving of every dollar they get and every contract they land. I also personally know a couple who couldn't tell you how a packet gets from one interface to another in a router. all the CCIE certification proves is that you have passed Cisco's lab test. It does not prove one way or another whether you know jack about networking. I suggest that there is a percentage of the 2000 or so who have attained the cert since last year who did so only because they successfully memorized enough scenario configurations that they were able to luck their way through when their lab closely resembled one of those scenarios they memorized. I personally know several folks who passed over the last 18 months whose only hands on experience was in their practice labs. Of these, all were pretty sharp dudes, by the way. From personal experience I can tell you that I saw absolutely nothing in my lab that made me wish I'd spent more time reading RFC's, or Comer, or any of the other great books of the networking world. I saw plenty that made me wish I'd spent more time on certain practice materials readily available ( I refer to the commercially available products. please do not contact me for names and sources ) whenever this topic comes up, I see
Re: Access-list and Port Scanner [7:19123]
Here is a even better one for windows, free download. http://www.languard.com/languard/languard.htm Will Francis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Guys I'm currently looking at how secure are access-lists to act as a firewall. Guy I'm having no luck at all finding a windows port scanner which is similar to port scanners on Linux/Unix platform, for instance let say NMAP. Come on windows guys, however we wont get in to a conversation about platforms windows/Linux here, just after a good port scanner. cheers Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19263t=19123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 804 Problem [7:19266]
Has anyone experienced a problem with the 800 series that makes one of the POTS ports go off-hook and stay that way? I have an 804 that port 1 has gone off-hook and I cannot get it to reset itself. I have reloaded the router, re-programmed, and reloaded the IOS and still have the same problem. I called SBC and they show the ISDN line as being in service. Help? Kelly D Griffin, CCDA, CCNA Network Engineer Kg2 Network Design http://kg2.com 877.418.4025 Toll-Free 501.418.4026 Fax http://kg2.com 8Mb Flash for Cisco 2500 series routers for $47 16Mb DRAM for Cisco 2500 series routers for $24 Back-to-Back cables starting at $24 Octal cables for Cisco 2509 and 2511 for $28 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19266t=19266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast traffic tunnelling [7:19267]
Hi All, Just checking anyone has the experience on the multicast tunnelling configuration. I have configured three routers to use the Sparse mode for multicast traffice and they works perfectly. After I remove the centre router command, ip pim sparse-mode and try to use the tunnel to conect the first and third router. I have problem. I use the following command to config the tunnel within the first and third router. interface tunnel0 ip unnumbered type number tunnel source ip-addressa tunnel destination ip-address It seems that the mulitcast traffic does not go to the tunnel automatically. I have tried the ip mroute 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tunnel0. And it does not help. For simplicity, I use all the ethernet port for the connection. Any suggestion would be highly appreciated. Francis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19267t=19267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easyip cable modem [7:19187]
Yes, the 10 nework is the next hop out of my router. I did a trace to find what the hops were so that's what I used. I now have my 2900 switch hooked up to it and it works great!! Bob Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... interestingly, there was a short thread on NANOG about increased instances of script kiddie behaviour now that the college kids are back in the dorms. Just tonight there were a couple of posts about a big probe coming into someone's network, and originating from three particular blocks in Taiwan. get your NBAR up and running! Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Medeiros Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 3:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Easyip cable modem [7:19187] Now you need to setup a fat access-list or CBAC for some security from all the idiots on your cable subnet. You wouldn't believe the probes I get every day!! This will be a little challanging for you cus of your dynamic address. Of course, since your router will be up all the time, chances are you will keep renewing the same IP. Let me know if you need some help on that. Better do it soon cus NAT won't protect you much, and you definitely need protecting. I run IDS on my router and log all the probes and @!#$ heads spoffing internal address and stuff. And believe me, that log gets pretty large especially when school is out !! Take care Tony - Original Message - From: Bob Lepine To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:39 AM Subject: Easyip cable modem [7:19187] Woohoo. I got it working. I have my 2600 hooked up to my cable modem of which I am a DHCP client. Thanks to the group for helping me figure this one out! (Especially Tony Medieros and Leigh Anne Chisholm) I have now hooked the router up to my 2900 switch and have access to the net with all my computer. This will greatly enhance my studies. I am listing the configuration for those who need to do the same. Names have been altered to protect the innocent! Current configuration : 997 bytes ! version 12.1 no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname BobRouter ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors enable password 7 045907031F23404B13 ! ip subnet-zero ! ! no ip finger ip host laptop 192.168.0.3 ip name-server 24.229.12.230 ip name-server 204.186.0.201 ip name-server 204.186.0.203 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address dhcp ip nat outside half-duplex ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Ethernet0/1 ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside half-duplex ! ip default-gateway 10.227.49.1 ip nat inside source list 10 interface Ethernet0/0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.227.49.1 no ip http server ! access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 no cdp run ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password 7 05090A0A314E420C03 login ! no scheduler allocate end -- Bob Lepine MCSE,MCDBA,CNA,CCNA,MCT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19268t=19187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written [7:19260]
Congrats... now just that little detail called the lab ;-) James Haynes wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Congratulations. -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP, CQS-SNA/IPSS Wright, Jeremy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I passed my CCIE written on Friday with an 810. Thanks to everybody on the list that has helped. I would like to especially thank Dennis Laganiere and the guys at Network Learning Inc. (aka ccbootcamp). I used all of the books mentioned before on the list along with the CCIE written class that ccbootcamp.com put on. Every one there was very professional and I appreciate the extra time they spent with me and the others to really nail down the concepts I had troubles with. I don't know if they are planning on doing another CCIE written class, but I would highly recommend them to train you if they do. On to the real challenge of the lab. Jeremy Wright Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19269t=19260 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IOS [7:19270]
Guys I'm trying to configure an 2503 to do IP ADDRESS NEGOTIATED, receive dhcp ip address and do nat for my test lab at work. Guys I got a couple of IOS c2500-is-l.120-9.bin and c2500-d-l.120-9.bin, which one will do the above. Will Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19270t=19270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boson test sofware [7:18765]
Call and ask for Chad Altman he will hook you up. - Original Message - From: Hoa Ngo To: Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:06 AM Subject: Re: Boson test sofware [7:18765] I bought 2 CCIE written tests 1 and 2. After upgrading, they are gone. I email them, but no response. Howard From: Jason Reply-To: Jason To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Boson test sofware [7:18765] Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 02:59:41 -0400 Get it from www.boson.com . The registration would work for the new versions as well unless you .. In which case, you probably should be not be asking here.. Omer Ehsan Dar wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... hi all can anybody send me boson test version 3.5 or 3.6 plz I lost mine and I have to install the old tests again. Thanks Omer _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19271t=18765 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Exam [7:18808]
Manny, I totally agree with John. So much theory that you see in the CCIE written is covered in the CCNP tests. Plus, it takes a while to get the CCIE number behind your name, while you could have CCNP after your name after passing just one more written test. I personally recommend knocking out your last test, and then take the written. Whatever you decide, good luck! Dave Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19272t=18808 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multicast traffic tunnelling [7:19267]
You are missing the ip pim x command withing the Interface Tunnel config. kwock99 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, Just checking anyone has the experience on the multicast tunnelling configuration. I have configured three routers to use the Sparse mode for multicast traffice and they works perfectly. After I remove the centre router command, ip pim sparse-mode and try to use the tunnel to conect the first and third router. I have problem. I use the following command to config the tunnel within the first and third router. interface tunnel0 ip unnumbered type number tunnel source ip-addressa tunnel destination ip-address It seems that the mulitcast traffic does not go to the tunnel automatically. I have tried the ip mroute 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tunnel0. And it does not help. For simplicity, I use all the ethernet port for the connection. Any suggestion would be highly appreciated. Francis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19273t=19267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IOS [7:19270]
You will need a T version of the IOS to do DHCP negotiation. Kelly D Griffin, CCDA, CCNA Network Engineer Kg2 Network Design http://kg2.com 877.418.4025 Toll-Free 501.418.4026 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Will Francis Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IOS [7:19270] Guys I'm trying to configure an 2503 to do IP ADDRESS NEGOTIATED, receive dhcp ip address and do nat for my test lab at work. Guys I got a couple of IOS c2500-is-l.120-9.bin and c2500-d-l.120-9.bin, which one will do the above. Will http://kg2.com 8Mb Flash for Cisco 2500 series routers for $47 16Mb DRAM for Cisco 2500 series routers for $24 Back-to-Back cables starting at $24 Octal cables for Cisco 2509 and 2511 for $28 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19275t=19270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Concert Frame Relay - ? [7:19276]
Can anyone explain what Concert Frame Relay (CRFS) is? Is there a difference between it and the standard Frame Relay ? If someone could shed some light on this, or even point me to a place where I can do some more reading I would be grateful. Thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19276t=19276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
I did a lot of research on that topic last year when I developed Sybex's CCNA Virtual Test Center. The following is an excerpt from that product: Split horizon can be disabled on a Frame Relay interface for some protocols, such as TCP/IP, but it cannot be disabled for protocols such as IPX (except when using EIGRP) and AppleTalk. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phantom Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232] Hi I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct and for which routing protocols can I do it. Thanks for the help Pieter Jordaan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19277t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
I did that for all my RIF questions where you had to do the canonical-noncanonical thing. This saved a lot of time cause they needed some figuring. When I went through the whole test I felt very confident that I had passed even without answering those questions. So instead of hurting my brain doing the binary and applying the rules to the situation I guessed the answers. Real nice feature Huh! 84 for the win. I guess the world will never know if I can do a conversion, but I don't think the world will ever ask. Don - Original Message - From: Tom Keough To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 5:17 PM Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] Thanks for all your comments and email!! I'll let you know tomorrow about marking and returning to the answers... This will be my 14th certification exam and I have not had one yet that I could go back and change my answers. It will be great if I can on the written. Tomorrow, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE Tom Keough wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it tomorrow and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. Did you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me time was not a factor on the CCNP exams. TIA, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19278t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multicast traffic tunnelling [7:19267]
Thanks. I think I have put the ip pim x command. - Original Message - From: Marcos Hernandez To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:17 PM Subject: Re: Multicast traffic tunnelling [7:19267] You are missing the ip pim x command withing the Interface Tunnel config. kwock99 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, Just checking anyone has the experience on the multicast tunnelling configuration. I have configured three routers to use the Sparse mode for multicast traffice and they works perfectly. After I remove the centre router command, ip pim sparse-mode and try to use the tunnel to conect the first and third router. I have problem. I use the following command to config the tunnel within the first and third router. interface tunnel0 ip unnumbered type number tunnel source ip-addressa tunnel destination ip-address It seems that the mulitcast traffic does not go to the tunnel automatically. I have tried the ip mroute 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tunnel0. And it does not help. For simplicity, I use all the ethernet port for the connection. Any suggestion would be highly appreciated. Francis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19279t=19267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IOS IPSec [7:19280]
Hi Group, Can I use secondary address on an interface as IPSec tunnel endpoint? I'm thinking encapsulation will fail. Can someone confirm/correct my thoughts? Thanks .. Joe. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19280t=19280 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
I took the written Friday (passed with 810) and could go back through the previous questions. One quick note about the RIF's.pay attention to the ring numbers they give to you and know when they are hex or not. Remember when you need matching ring numbers, when you don't, and when ring numbers don't apply. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] I did that for all my RIF questions where you had to do the canonical-noncanonical thing. This saved a lot of time cause they needed some figuring. When I went through the whole test I felt very confident that I had passed even without answering those questions. So instead of hurting my brain doing the binary and applying the rules to the situation I guessed the answers. Real nice feature Huh! 84 for the win. I guess the world will never know if I can do a conversion, but I don't think the world will ever ask. Don - Original Message - From: Tom Keough To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 5:17 PM Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] Thanks for all your comments and email!! I'll let you know tomorrow about marking and returning to the answers... This will be my 14th certification exam and I have not had one yet that I could go back and change my answers. It will be great if I can on the written. Tomorrow, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE Tom Keough wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it tomorrow and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. Did you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me time was not a factor on the CCNP exams. TIA, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19281t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
routing / convergence [7:19282]
I am running eigrp in my routing and have two separate paths to a destination. One path has a higher metric of course. Sometimes when the lower metric link goes down, sometimes it doesn't converge so that routing will go through the higher link automatically. Sometimes it does converge and go through the high metric when the lower metric link goes down. At other times when it does converge when the lower metric fails it will route through the high metric however when the lower metric link comes back up it doesn't converge so that routing will go back to the lower metric link - it remains routing via the higher metric link until I do a clear ip route * which of course converges and recalculates the routes. Is there a command or a way to fix this so that it will do it automatically. Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19282t=19282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multicast traffic tunnelling [7:19267]
If you have a CCO account, check this out. Just tried and it worked. Dont worry about the PIX config (it's just part of the example). http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/tunnel_pix.shtml Marcos At 23:26 10/09/2001 +0800, kwock99 wrote: Thanks. I think I have put the ip pim x command. - Original Message - From: Marcos Hernandez To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:17 PM Subject: Re: Multicast traffic tunnelling [7:19267] You are missing the ip pim x command withing the Interface Tunnel config. kwock99 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, Just checking anyone has the experience on the multicast tunnelling configuration. I have configured three routers to use the Sparse mode for multicast traffice and they works perfectly. After I remove the centre router command, ip pim sparse-mode and try to use the tunnel to conect the first and third router. I have problem. I use the following command to config the tunnel within the first and third router. interface tunnel0 ip unnumbered type number tunnel source ip-addressa tunnel destination ip-address It seems that the mulitcast traffic does not go to the tunnel automatically. I have tried the ip mroute 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tunnel0. And it does not help. For simplicity, I use all the ethernet port for the connection. Any suggestion would be highly appreciated. Francis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19284t=19267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938]
I believe 1494 is upd and 1604 is tcp. One port is used for the browser sservice and is udp. A search on NAT on the citrix site will provide a doc and how to set up citrix for nat through a firwall c -Original Message- From: Jeff Smith To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/7/01 4:05 PM Subject: Re: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938] I am pretty sure that Citrix uses port 1604 also. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938] Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:23:19 -0400 make a static mapping static (inside,outside) conduit permit tcp glbol ip add (citrix port ) 1494 i guess and 80 for web shd work fine - Original Message - From: Matthew Tayler To: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:18 PM Subject: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938] Has anybody any experience on how I can allow remote workers using Citrix/nfuse through a PIX to access internal servers please. I have tried using the notes from citrix but they cannot help further and all I get when making the connection is a long delay and timeout. The idea is our home workers go to the site home page and hit a link which redirects them to the Citrix/nfuse server, where they login. I am not a Citrix expert and the in house Citrix guys are saying that any problems are on the PIX. They are talking about kicking PIX out and just using some freebi firewall from microsoft. Any help or config extracts would be appreciated _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19283t=18938 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268]
Thanks for that link Bill - it rocks! Sam. - Original Message - From: Bill Carter To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:23 AM Subject: RE: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268] Rob Thomas has done some good work on this. http://www.cymru.com/~robt/Docs/Articles/secure-ios-template.html ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^ Bill Carter CCIE 5022 ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Gragido Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268] The firewall IOS is quite good however, if you do not wish to utilize it you can simply create ACLs that reflect your desires accordingly. ACLs are in laymans terms, the low brow fire wall rule set so have at it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bond Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 8:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268] Hello, I'm trying to make a 1720 router as firewall. What IOS should I use? What ACLs should I put in the router? My understanding on firewall is to allow outgoing traffic and block incoming traffic unless it's originated from inside, is it correct? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19286t=18268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IOS [7:19270]
Neither, you need the T train if you wish to run 12.0. here is a helpful tool for such questions: Dave Will Francis wrote: Guys I'm trying to configure an 2503 to do IP ADDRESS NEGOTIATED, receive dhcp ip address and do nat for my test lab at work. Guys I got a couple of IOS c2500-is-l.120-9.bin and c2500-d-l.120-9.bin, which one will do the above. Will -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19285t=19270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
Yes and this is another reason you want to configure frame relay with p-to-p subinterfaces. Dave Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: I did a lot of research on that topic last year when I developed Sybex's CCNA Virtual Test Center. The following is an excerpt from that product: Split horizon can be disabled on a Frame Relay interface for some protocols, such as TCP/IP, but it cannot be disabled for protocols such as IPX (except when using EIGRP) and AppleTalk. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phantom Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232] Hi I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct and for which routing protocols can I do it. Thanks for the help Pieter Jordaan -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19287t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: routing / convergence [7:19282]
like to see your configs and IOS versions, earlier EIGRP releases were pretty bug riddled Dave Tom Richs wrote: I am running eigrp in my routing and have two separate paths to a destination. One path has a higher metric of course. Sometimes when the lower metric link goes down, sometimes it doesn't converge so that routing will go through the higher link automatically. Sometimes it does converge and go through the high metric when the lower metric link goes down. At other times when it does converge when the lower metric fails it will route through the high metric however when the lower metric link comes back up it doesn't converge so that routing will go back to the lower metric link - it remains routing via the higher metric link until I do a clear ip route * which of course converges and recalculates the routes. Is there a command or a way to fix this so that it will do it automatically. Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19288t=19282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SFM on 6500 [7:19289]
Hi all, I would like to know anyone work with SFM on 6500 before. Any thing I need to pay attention when I play with SFM. Thanks mak Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19289t=19289 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Concert Frame Relay [7:19290]
Here are a couple of links I found on a Google.com search for Concert Frame Relay Both have at least somewhat a description of the service. http://www.sunrise.net/en/pdf_SS_glo_CFrameRelay.pdf http://www.sunrise.net/en/bus/bus_pro/bus_pro_glo/bus_pro_glo_fra.htm (this one has a link to the above PDF file. Specs only and references RFC#854 http://www.iasnet.ru/00_ENG/03_8.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19290t=19290 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:18843]
Good point. However, you guys have only discussed the two extremes: no experience and the 30-years experience burnout. I'd rather hire a lawyer with 5-10 years experience who still has enthusiasm. Sometimes the new kid on the block does a great job and sometimes she or he often screws up quite a bit before learning the ropes. But these are generalizations. The particular individual is what counts. Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: Actually, it's likely the lawyer fresh out of lawschool will do a better job than the cratchety old lawyer that's had a few years to become jaded by the system or to get an over-inflated view of themselves. The new kid on the block has something to prove so he'll go that extra mile to do a superb job. Did I mention I used to head up an IT division at a major Canadian law firm? (-: My point is... experience doesn't always matter. Brilliance and the willingness to do a good job can compensate quite well for experience. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:18843] hey, Brad, aren't you the guy who was complaining on the other list about what the one day lab would end up doing? ;- may I point out that the CPA or the State Bar, or the real estate broker's exam, for that matter, are very difficult, and only a small percentage of takers pass first time through. So who do you want doing your taxes - the guy fresh out of accounting school, or the guy with a few years experience? How about if you find yourself in court for one reason or another? Want that lawyer fresh out of law school who happened to pass the bar first try through? Hey - he's smart enough! Isn't he? and for those wondering, I deliberately avoided using real estate broker examples because the house its up for sale, and I don't care about credentials, just as long as I get my price. Any CCIE's out there want to come live in California? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brad Ellis Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE [7:18843] Chuck, Hi! Don't get me wrong, Im not saying CCIE's sh*t don't stink!!! I know a few CCIEs that I would let touch my network. However, I consider that the EXCEPTION and not the RULE. As a general rule of thumb, I consider the CCIE level of knowledge and applicable skills to be higher than minimal competence. I suppose it really depends on your definition of minimal competence. I define minimal competence as someone who has a fundamental understanding of networking with a small amount of hands-on experience. I would generally classify a CCIE to have a more in-depth understanding of networking fundamentals and quite a bit more hands-on experience than someone with minimal competence. Mr. Seltzer's writing says that the average CCIE is minimally competent in the product (I'd guess he was referring to Cisco). I think that's like saying NBA basketball players are minimally competent basketball players. To Michael Jordan that's probably true, but Im sure the general public would disagree. I suppose it really comes down to your definition of minimal competence. I have a great deal of respect for the majority of other CCIE's who I have come in contact with and consider calling them minimally competent to be an insult. -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... like everything else in this business, the answer is it depends. sorry folks, but CCIE's are not gods who walk among us. I personally know several CCIE's who are top notch and deserving of every dollar they get and every contract they land. I also personally know a couple who couldn't tell you how a packet gets from one interface to another in a router. all the CCIE certification proves is that you have passed Cisco's lab test. It does not prove one way or another whether you know jack about networking. I suggest that there is a percentage of the 2000 or so who have attained the cert since last year who did so only because they successfully memorized enough scenario configurations that they were able to luck their way through when their lab closely resembled one of those scenarios they memorized. I personally know several folks who passed over the last 18 months whose only hands on experience was in their practice labs. Of these, all were pretty sharp dudes, by the way. From personal experience I can tell you that I saw absolutely nothing in my lab that made me wish I'd spent more time reading RFC's, or Comer, or any of the other great books of the
RE: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268]
He also has a BGP config that is real good. ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^ Bill Carter CCIE 5022 ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sam Deckert Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268] Thanks for that link Bill - it rocks! Sam. - Original Message - From: Bill Carter To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:23 AM Subject: RE: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268] Rob Thomas has done some good work on this. http://www.cymru.com/~robt/Docs/Articles/secure-ios-template.html ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^ Bill Carter CCIE 5022 ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Gragido Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268] The firewall IOS is quite good however, if you do not wish to utilize it you can simply create ACLs that reflect your desires accordingly. ACLs are in laymans terms, the low brow fire wall rule set so have at it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bond Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 8:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how to make a router firewall? [7:18268] Hello, I'm trying to make a 1720 router as firewall. What IOS should I use? What ACLs should I put in the router? My understanding on firewall is to allow outgoing traffic and block incoming traffic unless it's originated from inside, is it correct? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19292t=18268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Concert Frame Relay - ? [7:19276]
Concert is just a service provider. It is a subsidary of ATT and BT. Basically, the 2 companies decided to move a big portion of their international operations into 1 joint venture between the two... So, in essence, ATT frame relay and BT frame relay and Concert FRS are almost identical... differences are how they configure the settings and such but that is like that for all service providers.. Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19293t=19276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232]
Cisco does actually let you turn off split horizon for AppleTalk RTMP. I don't think it is officially supported, but it does work. It's also not officially supported by the AppleTalk specification (Inside AppleTalk). So this got me wondering about IPX RIP. Of course, disabling split horizon is not officially supported for IPX RIP, per Novell's specification. And Cisco does not officially support turning it off either, but would the IOS let you do it anyway? The answer seems to be no on my routers running 11.0, but it would be worth a try on a more recent router (if my husband would let me buy new routers... ;-) Albany#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. Albany(config)#appletalk routing Albany(config)#int e0 Albany(config-if)#apple cable 10-10 Albany(config-if)#apple zone noparking Albany(config-if)#no apple rtmp split-horizon Albany(config-if)#ipx routing Albany(config)#int e0 Albany(config-if)#ipx network 10 Albany(config-if)#no ipx split-horizon % Incomplete command. Albany(config-if)#no ipx split-horizon ? eigrp Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) Albany(config-if)#no ipx split-horizon eigrp % Incomplete command. Albany(config-if)#no ipx split-horizon eigrp ? Autonomous system number Albany(config-if)#no ipx split-horizon eigrp 10 Of course, as we all know, if you use EIGRP for AppleTalk or IPX, then you can disable split horizon. Priscilla At 11:39 AM 9/10/01, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: I did a lot of research on that topic last year when I developed Sybex's CCNA Virtual Test Center. The following is an excerpt from that product: Split horizon can be disabled on a Frame Relay interface for some protocols, such as TCP/IP, but it cannot be disabled for protocols such as IPX (except when using EIGRP) and AppleTalk. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phantom Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question about split horizon IPX [7:19232] Hi I am studying for CCIE Written, one of my books say that you can't disable split horizon for IPX the other says you can. Which one of these are correct and for which routing protocols can I do it. Thanks for the help Pieter Jordaan Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19294t=19232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written [7:19295]
I am preparing for the CCIE (routing and switching)written exam. I have many years of networking experience, theoretical and practical and other vendors equipment, but relatively new to Cisco. I am also CCNP and CCDP certified. How much of the written exam questions are Cisco equipment specific? Do I need in-depth knowledge of Cisco IOS commands to pass the written? Suggestions for studying the written? Materials? Book? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19295t=19295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19296t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
I guess someone ran across Larry Seltzer's article in Fortune Small Business... Doesn't this get us back to the discussion where I stated that experience isn't necessary the be-all and end-all of answering the question, Who's the best? My point (and I'll say it again) is that experience doesn't always matter. Brilliance and the willingness to do a good job can compensate quite well for experience. If there's a firm out there that's looking for a specific block of CCIE's and isn't willing to interview a person because their CCIE number is from the wrong block, then that's a firm you don't want to work for. They're not selecting the best candidate for the job--but rather the person that looks best to a client. I can show you one CCIE right now that is in the 2000 range that I don't think has got half the skills of Tony Medeiros - CCIE #6172. And that is that organizations loss... No skin off my nose... It just helps me filter out who NOT to work for. -- Leigh Anne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19297t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
And I would imagine that this particular job will be posted for a while. They just cut out a whole bunch of prospective candidates with their one silly requirement. Heather -Original Message- From: Eric Rogers [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19298t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errata for BCRAN [7:19299]
Hi all, I've been on the Cisco Press site and not seen any errata for the BCRAN book. Have I missed it somewhere, or did I just read the wrong book? I've done the exam, so it's not crucial, I was just looking for errata for CIT when I noticed there wasn't any for BCRAN. It is a possibility that I have the wrong book. Inside of the front cover seems to detail the old CCNP exams (ACRC etc), and Windows 95 seems to be the main OS in the book, although the exam didn't seem to come any further up to date. This is supposed to be the Feb 2001 edition of the CCNP certification library. My ISBN for the BCRAN book is 1-57870-171-6 Anybody confirm it for me please? Thanks, Gaz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19299t=19299 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19300]
Did you notice that they want 3-6 years experience in High Speed Networking as well. A CCIE below 3000 has well over 6 years experience. They don't even know what they're asking for. At 03:02 PM 9/10/2001 -0400, Eric Rogers wrote: I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Darren S. Crawford Network Systems Consultant Lucent Technologies - Sacramento email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] page via email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pager: 800-467-1467 You always have time for things you put first - Tucker Resources x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19300t=19300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
that is not a big deal. One recruiter asking for a sub-3000 CCIE ensures them someone with at least 5 years of CCIE experience. It may not be a reflection of their overall experience, but apparently that's not what he's looking for. If you had taken and passed your lab exam at this time last year, you would have been in the 6200 range - still not enough to qualify for this job. The range for the job is stated in the posting - BGP, OSPF, STP, RIPv1/v2. Note that the current CCIE lab doesn't test Spanning Tree Protocol. That one job posting is not enough to get excited about, IMHO. Shoulda, coulda, woulda got your cert - my first lab attempt was 6 years ago - what CCIE would that have made me, had I passed it? ... though the CCIE's today might have a broader range, the elder CCIE's did not have the WEALTH of study information and guides that we have today, so I'd call that a wash. The recruiter is trying to narrow the search down to about 2000 candidates, most of whom are probably either gainfully employed, or retired from active networking duty. - Original Message - From: Eric Rogers To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:02 PM Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19301t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCBOOTCAMP lab question [7:19175]
Why not just do them anyway? :-) -Original Message- From: Arun Upadhyay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCBOOTCAMP lab question [7:19175] Hi Group I have subscribe ccbootcamp practice labs for for my CCIE lab preparation. But their labs still has VINES, DECNET, APPLETALK, ATM LANE...Which are not part of CCIE lab any more. Can somebody suggest me who did or doing these labs that how should I attemp those particular labs which has these topics for configuration. Thanks. Arun __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19253t=19175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP lab question [7:19175]
Arun, Hi! The older labs still do include some topics not covered on the current CCIE exam. Therefore, you could just NOT do the configs for those topics when you do the earlier practice labs. It should be pretty easy to skip the topics not covered by the CCIE exam now. If you purchase them and need assistance getting around those topics, I'd be more than happy to help. The new labs (labs 15+) do take into account the changes that were implemented in the CCIE tested technologies. The newer labs also cover VoIP, ATM, and IPSEC. Since ccbootcamp.com is constantly adding labs to the subscription (currently at 20 labs), the new labs will always reflect any announced changes in the CCIE program (as well as the virtual racks). In my personal opinion, they are the best labs on the market (I thought they were so good, I now own part of the company!!). Without using them, I dont think I would have gotten my CCIE #! thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco: www.optsys.net Arun Upadhyay wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Group I have subscribe ccbootcamp practice labs for for my CCIE lab preparation. But their labs still has VINES, DECNET, APPLETALK, ATM LANE...Which are not part of CCIE lab any more. Can somebody suggest me who did or doing these labs that how should I attemp those particular labs which has these topics for configuration. Thanks. Arun __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19228t=19175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Switch/Simulator (UK) [7:19240]
Ebay has listings for used models all the time. I just purchased an Emutel Solo. IMO, it is probably the most flexible and configurable for various lab scenarios. My .02c, Rob H.NP, DP, blah,blah,blah **Of course, you could also go with a Teltone. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19256t=19240 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of assurance that candidates will have many, many years of experience. I don't know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an assumption regarding the correlation/magnitude of relevant experience with a given CCIE number. However, my guess is that simply by virtue of having such a low number that quite a few of the early CCIEs are now firmly entrenched in the upper ranks of management (and thus possibly, but not necessarily, out of touch with current technology in the field) -- but that assumption could be quite flawed. Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19303t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
Thanks to all who responded to my question regarding time pressure and the written... I passed with a score of 85%!!! What a relief. When I got home with my registration number in hand I went to the Cisco web site and tried to register for the lab. Too soon, the error message says it will take 3 to 5 days for my results to make it to the registration database...;-( I want to see if I have a choice of a one day or two day lab date, anyone know? BTW I could go back to review my answers! I marked six that I guessed at and at the end of the exam I still didn't know them, not much help for me. Thanks again, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP, MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19304t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19305]
Eric Rogers wrote: My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. I hope so!! ;) Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) O that hurts!! I joke with a couple guys in my group #1040 and 1076, about that, when they went the IOS was 9.1 and when I went 11.0 just came out and the docs for 9.1 were about a quarter of the 11.0 and so the razing continues... Keep in mind though there were no CCIE books, practice labs, support groups, mail lists, CCxx's. etc... DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Good luck to you!!! :) Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. agree Dave Just MY percecption I guess! -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19305t=19305 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
That job looks like it sucks anyway... sam sneed Eric Rogers wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19306t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
My question is, what happens if a CCIE loses his number do to not recertifying? For example, if CCIE# 4000 doesn't recertify, is that number eligible for new CCIE's since it is now open. So if I get my CCIE tomorrow and 4000 didn't recert, is his number available to me? -Original Message- From: Glenn Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of assurance that candidates will have many, many years of experience. I don't know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an assumption regarding the correlation/magnitude of relevant experience with a given CCIE number. However, my guess is that simply by virtue of having such a low number that quite a few of the early CCIEs are now firmly entrenched in the upper ranks of management (and thus possibly, but not necessarily, out of touch with current technology in the field) -- but that assumption could be quite flawed. Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19307t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
Congratulations!! That's very cool! As far as the lab, last time I checked CCO stated that any labs scheduled after Sep. 1 would be the one-day lab. If that's still the case, then you're stuck with the new lab. It may have changed, though. Check out CCO to find the details. Regards, John Tom Keough 9/10/01 1:59:33 PM Thanks to all who responded to my question regarding time pressure and the written... I passed with a score of 85%!!! What a relief. When I got home with my registration number in hand I went to the Cisco web site and tried to register for the lab. Too soon, the error message says it will take 3 to 5 days for my results to make it to the registration database...;-( I want to see if I have a choice of a one day or two day lab date, anyone know? BTW I could go back to review my answers! I marked six that I guessed at and at the end of the exam I still didn't know them, not much help for me. Thanks again, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP, MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19308t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
Tom, Congrats. You have will have about a 6 month wait in the 2 day format. This actually will be better when the 1 day format crancks up at the beginning of October. Again congrats. - Original Message - From: Tom Keough To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:59 PM Subject: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304] Thanks to all who responded to my question regarding time pressure and the written... I passed with a score of 85%!!! What a relief. When I got home with my registration number in hand I went to the Cisco web site and tried to register for the lab. Too soon, the error message says it will take 3 to 5 days for my results to make it to the registration database...;-( I want to see if I have a choice of a one day or two day lab date, anyone know? BTW I could go back to review my answers! I marked six that I guessed at and at the end of the exam I still didn't know them, not much help for me. Thanks again, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP, MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19309t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
One day all the way, unless you are willing to take within the next few weeks. There are dates open this month. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304] Congratulations!! That's very cool! As far as the lab, last time I checked CCO stated that any labs scheduled after Sep. 1 would be the one-day lab. If that's still the case, then you're stuck with the new lab. It may have changed, though. Check out CCO to find the details. Regards, John Tom Keough 9/10/01 1:59:33 PM Thanks to all who responded to my question regarding time pressure and the written... I passed with a score of 85%!!! What a relief. When I got home with my registration number in hand I went to the Cisco web site and tried to register for the lab. Too soon, the error message says it will take 3 to 5 days for my results to make it to the registration database...;-( I want to see if I have a choice of a one day or two day lab date, anyone know? BTW I could go back to review my answers! I marked six that I guessed at and at the end of the exam I still didn't know them, not much help for me. Thanks again, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP, MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19310t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
Congrats! Two day lab until 10-1-01 so my guess is you'll be doing the 1 dayer. Good luck Dave Tom Keough wrote: Thanks to all who responded to my question regarding time pressure and the written... I passed with a score of 85%!!! What a relief. When I got home with my registration number in hand I went to the Cisco web site and tried to register for the lab. Too soon, the error message says it will take 3 to 5 days for my results to make it to the registration database...;-( I want to see if I have a choice of a one day or two day lab date, anyone know? BTW I could go back to review my answers! I marked six that I guessed at and at the end of the exam I still didn't know them, not much help for me. Thanks again, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP, MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19311t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back to Back ISDN [7:19312]
This is a fine group and I lurk here often, please help if you can... Does anyone know if its possible to setup two C2503's back to back over a single ISDN line, assigning one spid to one router and the other spid to the second router? I have 2 Cisco 2503's with st Bri. Im using Motorola NT1 device with a single U interface and 2 ST ports. I have at my disposal a single ISDN line from SW Bell. I would like to split the spids at the nt1 device and practice my DDR with only one spid on each router. If this is possible, please forward any info you might have on exactly how to do this? Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19312t=19312 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938]
Actually, 1494 is TCP and 1604 is UDP. Here's a section from a working config (the IP's, of course, have been changed): static (inside,outside) 206.214.103.61 10.1.1.17 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 conduit permit tcp host 206.214.103.61 eq 1494 any conduit permit udp host 206.214.103.61 eq 1604 any conduit permit tcp host 206.214.103.61 eq www any The last line is for Nfuse. HTH, Randall -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ciaron Gogarty Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 09:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938] I believe 1494 is upd and 1604 is tcp. One port is used for the browser sservice and is udp. A search on NAT on the citrix site will provide a doc and how to set up citrix for nat through a firwall c -Original Message- From: Jeff Smith To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/7/01 4:05 PM Subject: Re: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938] I am pretty sure that Citrix uses port 1604 also. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938] Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:23:19 -0400 make a static mapping static (inside,outside) conduit permit tcp glbol ip add (citrix port ) 1494 i guess and 80 for web shd work fine - Original Message - From: Matthew Tayler To: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:18 PM Subject: PIX Citrix/nfuse access [7:18938] Has anybody any experience on how I can allow remote workers using Citrix/nfuse through a PIX to access internal servers please. I have tried using the notes from citrix but they cannot help further and all I get when making the connection is a long delay and timeout. The idea is our home workers go to the site home page and hit a link which redirects them to the Citrix/nfuse server, where they login. I am not a Citrix expert and the in house Citrix guys are saying that any problems are on the PIX. They are talking about kicking PIX out and just using some freebi firewall from microsoft. Any help or config extracts would be appreciated _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19313t=18938 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert? [7:19296]
The other thing worth considering here is that perhaps they want the bragging rights... face it, some company's (especially network consulting) hire CCIE's for their knowledge, as well as so they can say We have X number of CCIE's. Your initials don't just sound good after your name, but also your employers... With that thought, maybe this employer figures that by saying We have 5 CCIE's, all under the number 3000 they'll have some pretty good bragging rights. Dave Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19314t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
Just think. Howard B isn't qualified for that job because he didn't certify as a CCIE years ago. And as we all know, he doesn't even come CLOSE to having those kinds of qualifications! Simple point is... not everyone that's got years and years of experience certified with Cisco. Many people I know don't feel that they have to prove their knowledge by sitting an exam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EA Louie Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] that is not a big deal. One recruiter asking for a sub-3000 CCIE ensures them someone with at least 5 years of CCIE experience. It may not be a reflection of their overall experience, but apparently that's not what he's looking for. If you had taken and passed your lab exam at this time last year, you would have been in the 6200 range - still not enough to qualify for this job. The range for the job is stated in the posting - BGP, OSPF, STP, RIPv1/v2. Note that the current CCIE lab doesn't test Spanning Tree Protocol. That one job posting is not enough to get excited about, IMHO. Shoulda, coulda, woulda got your cert - my first lab attempt was 6 years ago - what CCIE would that have made me, had I passed it? ... though the CCIE's today might have a broader range, the elder CCIE's did not have the WEALTH of study information and guides that we have today, so I'd call that a wash. The recruiter is trying to narrow the search down to about 2000 candidates, most of whom are probably either gainfully employed, or retired from active networking duty. - Original Message - From: Eric Rogers To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:02 PM Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19315t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
I think they hang the number up in a hall some where. Kind of like retiring a basball or football number.;) Eric Lange Qwest Communications CCNA, CCNP -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] My question is, what happens if a CCIE loses his number do to not recertifying? For example, if CCIE# 4000 doesn't recertify, is that number eligible for new CCIE's since it is now open. So if I get my CCIE tomorrow and 4000 didn't recert, is his number available to me? -Original Message- From: Glenn Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of assurance that candidates will have many, many years of experience. I don't know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an assumption regarding the correlation/magnitude of relevant experience with a given CCIE number. However, my guess is that simply by virtue of having such a low number that quite a few of the early CCIEs are now firmly entrenched in the upper ranks of management (and thus possibly, but not necessarily, out of touch with current technology in the field) -- but that assumption could be quite flawed. Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19316t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
That very question came up in a discussion recently and though we didn't find the answer, (nor look very hard), I don't think the numbers would be recycled. If I lost mine, a real posibility if I don't get my a** in and get done with it, and I had to, God forbid, retake the lab, I assume I would get my number back. There appears to be enough people on this list so I'm sure someone knows the answer, anyone??? Dave Wright, Jeremy wrote: My question is, what happens if a CCIE loses his number do to not recertifying? For example, if CCIE# 4000 doesn't recertify, is that number eligible for new CCIE's since it is now open. So if I get my CCIE tomorrow and 4000 didn't recert, is his number available to me? -Original Message- From: Glenn Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of assurance that candidates will have many, many years of experience. I don't know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an assumption regarding the correlation/magnitude of relevant experience with a given CCIE number. However, my guess is that simply by virtue of having such a low number that quite a few of the early CCIEs are now firmly entrenched in the upper ranks of management (and thus possibly, but not necessarily, out of touch with current technology in the field) -- but that assumption could be quite flawed. Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19318t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
Argh. I forgot anything prefixed with a less than symbol gets turfed. After my comment about Howard not coming close to having those kids of qualifications, I put in a **insert teasing look here** comment. It was meant in jest. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leigh Anne Chisholm Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] Just think. Howard B isn't qualified for that job because he didn't certify as a CCIE years ago. And as we all know, he doesn't even come CLOSE to having those kinds of qualifications! Simple point is... not everyone that's got years and years of experience certified with Cisco. Many people I know don't feel that they have to prove their knowledge by sitting an exam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EA Louie Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] that is not a big deal. One recruiter asking for a sub-3000 CCIE ensures them someone with at least 5 years of CCIE experience. It may not be a reflection of their overall experience, but apparently that's not what he's looking for. If you had taken and passed your lab exam at this time last year, you would have been in the 6200 range - still not enough to qualify for this job. The range for the job is stated in the posting - BGP, OSPF, STP, RIPv1/v2. Note that the current CCIE lab doesn't test Spanning Tree Protocol. That one job posting is not enough to get excited about, IMHO. Shoulda, coulda, woulda got your cert - my first lab attempt was 6 years ago - what CCIE would that have made me, had I passed it? ... though the CCIE's today might have a broader range, the elder CCIE's did not have the WEALTH of study information and guides that we have today, so I'd call that a wash. The recruiter is trying to narrow the search down to about 2000 candidates, most of whom are probably either gainfully employed, or retired from active networking duty. - Original Message - From: Eric Rogers To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:02 PM Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19317t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setup a Home-Lab or spend that money on Rack time [7:19319]
Just a question :- 1. Should one spend money on setting up a home-lab. If so, then what are the exercises that one uses to practise on ? If you buy one of the subscriptions, would it not be better then to buy their Rack time as well, since their racks would be setup in line with their lab-subsription exercise itself ? Which brings me to my second question of course 2.Should one spend the money on a lab-subscription with adequate Rack time to try all their examples twice ot thrice over ? Just a little confused on which way to go with the money ? Any advice would be really appreciated Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19319t=19319 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
It took six business and eight regular days for mine to show up. Took mine on Wed showed up the next Thurs. You can call prometric/vue on Wed and see if they have your score in their database, then it is off to cisco. Still scheduling two-dayers. - Original Message - From: Tom Keough To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:59 PM Subject: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304] Thanks to all who responded to my question regarding time pressure and the written... I passed with a score of 85%!!! What a relief. When I got home with my registration number in hand I went to the Cisco web site and tried to register for the lab. Too soon, the error message says it will take 3 to 5 days for my results to make it to the registration database...;-( I want to see if I have a choice of a one day or two day lab date, anyone know? BTW I could go back to review my answers! I marked six that I guessed at and at the end of the exam I still didn't know them, not much help for me. Thanks again, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP, MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19320t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
If that were true someone would go on a shooting rampage. I'll bet that if you let your cert lapse and then recert at a later time you probably get your old number back. Just a hunch, someone know better. Don - Original Message - From: Wright, Jeremy To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:20 PM Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] My question is, what happens if a CCIE loses his number do to not recertifying? For example, if CCIE# 4000 doesn't recertify, is that number eligible for new CCIE's since it is now open. So if I get my CCIE tomorrow and 4000 didn't recert, is his number available to me? -Original Message- From: Glenn Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of assurance that candidates will have many, many years of experience. I don't know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an assumption regarding the correlation/magnitude of relevant experience with a given CCIE number. However, my guess is that simply by virtue of having such a low number that quite a few of the early CCIEs are now firmly entrenched in the upper ranks of management (and thus possibly, but not necessarily, out of touch with current technology in the field) -- but that assumption could be quite flawed. Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19322t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert? [7:19323]
You are right but to be a certified Cisco Gold partner for example you must ave a certain number of CCIE's per X revenue. Dave David Goddard wrote: The other thing worth considering here is that perhaps they want the bragging rights... face it, some company's (especially network consulting) hire CCIE's for their knowledge, as well as so they can say We have X number of CCIE's. Your initials don't just sound good after your name, but also your employers... With that thought, maybe this employer figures that by saying We have 5 CCIE's, all under the number 3000 they'll have some pretty good bragging rights. Dave -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19323t=19323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote: While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of snip Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) CNX numbers really were in Hex! Mine is 01CCDD. ;-) Priscilla (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19324t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
If you can develop the database technology to efficiently and elegantly clean up all records that refer to CCIE as so-and-so, you can have the number after so-and-so fails to recertify. That's the rule that I heard. Just kidding! ;-) Priscilla At 04:53 PM 9/10/01, MADMAN wrote: That very question came up in a discussion recently and though we didn't find the answer, (nor look very hard), I don't think the numbers would be recycled. If I lost mine, a real posibility if I don't get my a** in and get done with it, and I had to, God forbid, retake the lab, I assume I would get my number back. There appears to be enough people on this list so I'm sure someone knows the answer, anyone??? Dave Wright, Jeremy wrote: My question is, what happens if a CCIE loses his number do to not recertifying? For example, if CCIE# 4000 doesn't recertify, is that number eligible for new CCIE's since it is now open. So if I get my CCIE tomorrow and 4000 didn't recert, is his number available to me? -Original Message- From: Glenn Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of assurance that candidates will have many, many years of experience. I don't know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an assumption regarding the correlation/magnitude of relevant experience with a given CCIE number. However, my guess is that simply by virtue of having such a low number that quite a few of the early CCIEs are now firmly entrenched in the upper ranks of management (and thus possibly, but not necessarily, out of touch with current technology in the field) -- but that assumption could be quite flawed. Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19325t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
When they get close to giving out Certification C0FFEE, let me know. I'll be there with bells on! (-: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote: While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of snip Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) CNX numbers really were in Hex! Mine is 01CCDD. ;-) Priscilla (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19326t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
Oh no you don't! As the resident caffeine addict, I think I should have first dibs on that one. ;-) But since I'm such a nice guy I'd let you have it in trade for a year's supply of Folger's coffee (I have no standards ) John Leigh Anne Chisholm 9/10/01 3:29:16 PM When they get close to giving out Certification C0FFEE, let me know. I'll be there with bells on! (-: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote: While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of snip Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) CNX numbers really were in Hex! Mine is 01CCDD. ;-) Priscilla (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19327t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multihoming BGP with two seperate ISP's via single router that [7:19328]
Hello, I am multihoming BGP with two seperate ISP's via single router that is connected to a PIX. When I shutdown the one of my serial ports to one of the ISP's you can see the BGP table removing paths. All trace's show that the router starts routing to the ISP that is still active, but all the workstations on the inside of the pix interface can no longer route. I've read where the PIX Firewall does not support the use of BGP, and that I could use RIP between them. Does anyone have an example of this configuration? My searches on this subject within Cisco's knowledgebase have not been very successfull. Or if you can think of another solution for my setup, please let me know. Thank you, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19328t=19328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19321]
also another point to consider is that some current ccie might not , pass the lab on their first try...and f they dont what will happen to their numbers? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darren Crawford Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19300] Did you notice that they want 3-6 years experience in High Speed Networking as well. A CCIE below 3000 has well over 6 years experience. They don't even know what they're asking for. At 03:02 PM 9/10/2001 -0400, Eric Rogers wrote: I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Darren S. Crawford Network Systems Consultant Lucent Technologies - Sacramento email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] page via email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pager: 800-467-1467 You always have time for things you put first - Tucker Resources x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19321t=19321 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
Just think. Howard B isn't qualified for that job because he didn't certify as a CCIE years ago. And as we all know, he doesn't even come CLOSE to having those kinds of qualifications! Actually, you remind me of a dinner when I was teaching for what is now Information Innovations, headed by Gary Rubin. We were going around the table, comparing our CCSI numbers, and he very proudly claimed 93007. I looked at him with great compassion and said softly...Gary, I'm 93005. For that matter, I've never seen Tony Li, Yakov Rekhter, Dino Farinacci, Paul Ferguson, Paul Traina, Fred Baker, Dave Katz, Derek Yeung, Eric Rosen, etc., while they are/were at Cisco, sign themselves as CCIE. Among that list are the principal architects of BGP, ISIS, EIGRP, OSPF, QoS, and MPLS (at least the Cisco implementations). The list also includes the former head of the IETF and any number of WG chairs, IESG, and IAB members. As to the job posting -- are we sure it doesn't come from Catbert, evil HR Director? Simple point is... not everyone that's got years and years of experience certified with Cisco. Many people I know don't feel that they have to prove their knowledge by sitting an exam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EA Louie Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] that is not a big deal. One recruiter asking for a sub-3000 CCIE ensures them someone with at least 5 years of CCIE experience. It may not be a reflection of their overall experience, but apparently that's not what he's looking for. If you had taken and passed your lab exam at this time last year, you would have been in the 6200 range - still not enough to qualify for this job. The range for the job is stated in the posting - BGP, OSPF, STP, RIPv1/v2. Note that the current CCIE lab doesn't test Spanning Tree Protocol. That one job posting is not enough to get excited about, IMHO. Shoulda, coulda, woulda got your cert - my first lab attempt was 6 years ago - what CCIE would that have made me, had I passed it? ... though the CCIE's today might have a broader range, the elder CCIE's did not have the WEALTH of study information and guides that we have today, so I'd call that a wash. The recruiter is trying to narrow the search down to about 2000 candidates, most of whom are probably either gainfully employed, or retired from active networking duty. - Original Message - From: Eric Rogers To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:02 PM Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19329t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IOS [7:19270]
Dave Where is the helpful tool cheers MADMAN wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Neither, you need the T train if you wish to run 12.0. here is a helpful tool for such questions: Dave Will Francis wrote: Guys I'm trying to configure an 2503 to do IP ADDRESS NEGOTIATED, receive dhcp ip address and do nat for my test lab at work. Guys I got a couple of IOS c2500-is-l.120-9.bin and c2500-d-l.120-9.bin, which one will do the above. Will -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19330t=19270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
I'm sorry you can't have that number. It's the number of my Novell 3.12 server and is registered with the U.S. Department of Really Neat Novell Server Addresses. :) Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: When they get close to giving out Certification C0FFEE, let me know. I'll be there with bells on! (-: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] At 03:58 PM 9/10/01, Glenn Johnson wrote: While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the potential to be abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some heightened level of snip Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in HEX, maybe they will be unable to convert it properly :-) CNX numbers really were in Hex! Mine is 01CCDD. ;-) Priscilla (just kidding of course) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19331t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Confederations [7:19332]
Hi, I'm studying for the CCIE written Exam and am stuck on BGP confederations. From the material I've read, I am confused about whether to use separate autonymous systems numbers for each confederation or separate confederation numbers or both. Can some elaborate? Thanks! Joseph Berkeley Sr. Network Engineer CCNP 719-535-4736 VNET 622-4736 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19332t=19332 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
new purchase [7:19334]
Hi all was just wondering wether or not the Cisco 3102 would be worth having for a home lab I know that they are eol was just wondering if anyone had a opinion on this product the will be used for my CCNP. D'Wayne Saunders Network Admin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19334t=19334 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
The style reminds me a bit of some job ads I've seen for government jobs around here in the past. All guvvie jobs here used to have to be advertised (in theory at least), so if they already had someone lined up and didn't want to have too many other candidates the job criteria would just be very narrow... Doesn't look much like a guvvie job though. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 11/09/2001 09:00 am - Buri, Heather L. cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for [EMAIL PROTECTED]the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] 11/09/2001 05:23 am Please respond to Buri, Heather L. And I would imagine that this particular job will be posted for a while. They just cut out a whole bunch of prospective candidates with their one silly requirement. Heather -Original Message- From: Eric Rogers [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296] I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my attention. dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser) This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a number range for a CCIE job!!! My question aloud is this - With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the less value to the customer/employer/client. Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5 years ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-) DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now. Me: Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz Headhunter: Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in the long run. Just MY percecption I guess! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19337t=19296 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FR question - Configuring Fractional T1 on the WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:19335]
Ole, I was going to post this yesterday but got called on to make a house call to a sick router :-( Not in direct answer to your question, but I suggest you look into traffic shaping at the hub. Using traffic shaping, you can prevent the hub from trying to send data down a PVC at greater than 256 kbps - without traffic shaping, the router doesn't know that the other end can only deal with 256 kbps, but the telco's switch does and will drop any traffic above 256kbps. A presentation at Networkers 2000 Melbourne had some good guidelines for frame relay traffic shaping - I don't know a URL (or even if it's online still), but drop me a note if you're interested. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 10/09/2001 03:07 pm - Ole Drews Jensen To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR question - Configuring Sent by: Fractional T1 on the WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:19119] nobody@groups tudy.com 09/09/2001 03:21 am Please respond to Ole Drews Jensen Thanks to all of you who replied to this one. And yes, the host has 768 kbps bandwidth, and each of the three branch offices has 256 kbps. All I needed to know was if I needed any timeslot config on the subs, but I now know that I don't. Thanks again, and have a great weekend, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 1:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR question - Configuring Fractional T1 on the WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:19093] I had read the message as each of the branch offices having a 256K link. in any case, Rik, you are probably correct in your interpretation as well. Only Ole can clarify what he meant. My point ( and yours ) is that there is no way or need to do further configuration on the host site with regards to the frame connection. The timeslots are not reserved in terms of which DLCI uses which timeslots or group of timeslots. all data will go out the physical interface as fast as the wire permits. the layer three to layer two mapping will determine which PVC gets which of those frames. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rik Guyler Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR question - Configuring Fractional T1 on the WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:19091] However, it appears that Ole wants to (correct me if I'm wrong) limit the bandwidth per DLCI. Is this true? If that's the case, unfortunately there is no way to do this on the router. When you order a FR circuit, you are typically ordering a T1 for layer 1 so you really are just getting 1 pipe capable of flowing 768k. The DLCIs converge into this pipe in a logical fashion, not a physical one, hence the layer 2 stuff (FR encapsulation) needed at this point. --- Rik Guyler -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR question - Configuring Fractional T1 on the WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:19081] Ole, my man, you are trying to outsmart yourself, and you're a pretty smart guy ;- Your T1 module is for the telco interface only. You purchased 768K, it appears. Your DLCI's / PVC's will share that 768K with no further layer 1 actions on your part once you have properly configured the layer one stuff - the timeslots and B8ZS and ESF and yellow alarm and loopback and clock source, you are done with the service module. All that remains is assigning the DLCI's to the appropriate subinterface, and IP addressing for the PVC's, and you are on your way. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FR question - Configuring Fractional T1 on the WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:19057] I am now on unknown territory, where no man in my shoes has walked before. I have a Frame Relay
