Re: pix and xlate timeouts [7:52048]

2002-08-28 Thread Paul Lalonde

I've also noticed that a CLEAR ARP will resolve the problem temporarily.
Very, very strange behaviour indeed.

Paul
[remove 'nospam' from my e-mail address to reply]

David Armstrong  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Yes, and they're very annoying. I installed a 506 last Friday. Mostly the
 problem is with users who are receiving their IP's via DHCP configured on
 the PIX but occasionally a user with a static address has this problem.
 CLEAR XLATE temporarily resolves  the problem. I was getting ready to
delve
 into the solution on CCO but thought I'd check here first.

 Evidently I'm not alone. I'll reply here when the answer is found.

 David Armstrong

 Jorge Gittins  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Has anyone here experienced problems with the new ios  6.2 on the pix. I
  have noticed when I installed it that some users can connect to the
  internet until I issue clear xlate command.
 
  These are my current timeouts:
 
 
  timeout xlate 3:00:00
  timeout conn 12:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 rpc 0:10:00 h323
  0:05:00 s
  ip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
  timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52227t=52048
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NAT dilemma [7:42762]

2002-04-27 Thread Paul Lalonde

John,

Two things I can think of:

1. The cable provider is probably providing you with a default gateway
*anyways* in your DHCP request. Likely, you don't need that static route
after all.

2. As far as I can tell, your route wouldn't work in any event.  Routing out
via a physical interface works fine in serial point-to-point situations when
the other next-hop router is going to receive the packet anyway... but
routing out via an Ethernet interface will likely just *drop* the packet
onto that broadcast domain (subnet) without pointing it to a specific next
hop. Keep in mind that Ethernet is a broadcast-based multi-access medium. By
routing to the physical Ethernet interface, you're basically dropping the
packet on the wire, not shoving it directly to the next-hop router.

Hope this helps!
Paul



John Zaggat  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi guys/gals,

 I am using a 1605R with 2 ethernet interfaces as
 gateway to my cable service provider. My dilemma is
 that when I put a default route to outside NAT stops
 working. I verified this by using a sniffer. Without
 default route everything seems to work fine but it's
 just bugging the hell out of me that why is it so. Can
 some one enlighten me ?
 Here is my config:

 Router#sh run
 Building configuration...

 Current configuration : 939 bytes
 !
 version 12.2
 service timestamps debug uptime
 service timestamps log uptime
 no service password-encryption
 service udp-small-servers
 service tcp-small-servers
 !
 hostname Router
 !
 !
 ip subnet-zero
 ip name-server 66.75.160.42
 ip name-server 66.75.160.41
 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.10
 !
 ip dhcp pool INSIDE
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.1.1
dns-server 66.75.160.42
 !
 ip ssh time-out 120
 ip ssh authentication-retries 3
 !
 !
 !
 !
 interface Ethernet0
  ip address dhcp
  ip nat outside
  no cdp enable
 !
 interface Ethernet1
  ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
  ip nat inside
  no cdp enable
 !
 ip nat inside source list 1 interface Ethernet0
 overload
 ip classless
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet0  no ip http server
 no ip pim bidir-enable
 !
 access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
 no cdp advertise-v2
 no cdp run
 !
 line con 0
 line vty 0 3
  login
 line vty 4
  password cisco
  login
 !
 end

 =
 JZ
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
 http://health.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42770t=42762
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AGS+ Router Question [7:38726]

2002-04-07 Thread Paul Lalonde

Have you ever seen one of those AGS routers humming away? :-)  Let's put it
this way... they use standard 110V power, alright, but draw upwards of 7
AMPs.

Not only that, but they have a high-output fan blower assembly that runs
right off the 110V main power. No dinky 12V fan here! :-)

In short, they're loud, they're power hungry, but they're also FAST and very
suitable for low-cost Cisco lab racks!!

Paul

H Howard Lewis Bloom  wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Exactly what kind of power are we talking about here?  I've seen this
 routers on Ebay and seen nothing about special power requirements.
 It's standard 110 Volt right?



 On 18 Mar 2002 19:01:35 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Letterman)
wrote:

 it should be free, since it'll cost a fortune
 to power it.I got a 4000 with a 4 port serial
 module to do the frame switch part, works great and
 the electric company doesn't get my pay check...
 
 
 Larry Letterman
 Cisco Systems
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:23 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: AGS+ Router Question [7:38726]
 
 
 At 05:46 PM 3/18/02, Jeff Barr wrote:
 I was thinking of buying an AGS+ router for a frame relay/x.25 switch
for
 my
 lab. Are there any reasons I would want to buy a 2500 series(2522 or
2523)
 over one of these? Also, the IOS on the one im looking at is pretty old
 (like 9.x if im right?). Will this cause any problems?
 
 Yes. The frame-relay switching command wasn't added until 10.0! But you
 could upgrade the IOS, maybe.
 
 The AGS is infamous for being very noisy and requiring lots of power.
 
 But it's probably cheap! ;-)
 
 Im not going to use
 it for anything else other than to simulate the frame realy/x.25 cloud.
 
 TIA,
 Jeff
 
 
 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40750t=38726
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AGS+ parts needed! [7:39921]

2002-03-30 Thread Paul Lalonde

Greg,

Radio Shack has a handful of ON / OFF toggle switches that will do the job
nicely. You may need to shore up the diameter gap between the Radio Shack
on/off switch and the hole in the AGS chassis with washers, but it's a nice
quick fix.

Paul

Greg Macaulay  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi all,

 I recently purchased an AGS+ on eBay and unfortunately it was damaged in
 shipment.  Please don't waste BW telling me the shortcomings of the AGS+
 over the 2520 series -- I already know that -- but cost was a major
factor!

 Anyway, the area that was damaged was the on/off switch.  Also the metal
 guard around the switch and the back plate.  Very simply, the seller did
not
 package the router correctly and left a space between the rear of the
router
 and the side of the box.  During shipment, the router probably constantly
 slid back and forth, with the switch each time hitting against the side of
 the box and whatever solid object was on the outside.  The plates probably
 can be reshaped with some careful banging and tapping.  But the main
 item is the on/off switch!

 It has a neck which broke off from the main part of the switch with each
 part having a part that the other needs for the whole to function.

 In any event, I have searched the CCO to no avail!!  Does anyone have any
 idea as to how/where I can obtain a replacement switch??  Any and all
 suggestions will be quite welcome.

 Thanks to all in advance.

 Greg Macaulay
 Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth
 Lifetime AARP member
 Retired Attorney/Law Professor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39959t=39921
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Loading IOS on a 4000M [7:35689]

2002-02-17 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi

I don't think the NP-6E is supported on the 4000-M... only the 4500 and
4700.

Paul

Gragg Vaill  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I admit to being stuck, I have inherited a 4000M that is blank (no IOS)
 and for the life of me I cannot figure out how to get the IOS loaded on
 it. The console port is a DB-25 and I do not have a working Ethernet
 card for it. I do have a couple np-4t cards though. Speaking of Ethernet
 cards for this model, I have a couple np-6e cards that give the
 following error on boot up %nim-2-badnimid: BAD NIM ID. I'm guessing
 that means the cards are bad (boy am I glad that they were part of the
 inheritance!) and if they aren't, what does the error mean and how would
 on go about fixing it? Thanks in advance for your time, I do greatly
 appreciate it.

 Gragg Vaill




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35700t=35689
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Terminal Server setup [7:33439]

2002-01-28 Thread Paul Lalonde

To do reverse telnet to some Cat switches (with the RJ45 port), you need to
hardwire pins 1 and 8 on the Cisco rollover cable. I had the same problem
with a 2924XL and this solved the problem.

To do this, just nick the side of the rollover cable on pin 1 and pin 8 --
just enough to expose the conductor. Then solder a small strand of wire
between pin 1 and pin 8.

Should solve the problem.

Paul Lalonde

 wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 All,

 I have a home lab setup and all the devices in the lab I can reverse
telnet
 to from my 2509, except for a 1924EN switch. When I try to reverse telnet
 into this switch I never get a prompt back it just sort of hangs. I can't
 seem to find anything on CCO in reference to this. I am sure some of you
 guys have setup this same type setup before any help would be appreciated.
 This is really confusing me something that seems so simple. I have 7 other
 devices that I am able to reverse telnet into except for this one.
 Maybe if you can point me to some docs or provide a sample config that
 would be greatly appreciated.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33518t=33439
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ebay question [7:32808]

2002-01-23 Thread Paul Lalonde

I have dealt with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have had no problems.

In fact, I had purchased a couple of Bay switches about eight months ago
that were advertised with rackmount brackets, but didn't arrive with any. I
followed up with him and he subsequently sent me the two I requested, plus
TWO EXTRA pairs for my troubles. Great guy!

Paul

Stuart Laubstein  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Has anyone used the seller   [EMAIL PROTECTED] before?   Anyone got any
 good ebay sellers to recommend?

 thanks

 stuart




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32946t=32808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MZMaker IOS c2500-js-l.12.1.10 [7:32748]

2002-01-21 Thread Paul Lalonde

Guys,

This is exactly what is happening. Unfortunately, Will has a 2500 without
the 2MB of soldered on-board DRAM, thus he only has 14MB of RAM for use by
run from RAM images.

Will, you'll need to find a smaller image!   Or, find a 2500 mainboard with
the 2MB of soldered on-board memory. :-(

Paul [PCL]


Gaz  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Will,

 I'm guessing a little at this one. The memory at 0x00E392A4, from a quick
 bash on the calculator is around 14.5 Mb.
 Your router has 14336 Kbytes of main memory available for the IOS.
 Someone posted a thread a few days ago, which mentioned the two different
 types of 2500. One with 2Mb RAM soldered to main board and one without.
 Looks like yours is one without so is using the first 2mB(ish) for IO.
 So it actually only has 14336 Kbytes available RAM.

 As I said, guessing a little, so anyone feel free to jump in and correct.

 Regards,

 Gaz

 Will Francis  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Hi Guys
 
  I'm just in the process of building my home lab and I read quite a few
  previous posting suggesting that one can use MZMAKER to compress
 enterprise
  version of  IOS 12.1 to run from a 2500 series router with 8mb flash and
  16mb Dram.
 
  I just tried this and my router just keep on rebooting itself, any ideas
 at
  all will be greatly appreciated.
 
  System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE
  Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems
  2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory
 
  %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 12.0 may not be
correctly
  understood.F3: 8564+6636705+165012 at 0x1000
 
  Error : memory requirements exceed available memory
  Memory required : 0x00E392A4
 
  Exception: Software forced crash at 0x111E (PC)
 
 
  Thanks in advance !!!
 
  --
  Regards,
 
  Stanley.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32755t=32748
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 7010 [7:32780]

2002-01-21 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi there,

Older 7000s will only accept newer IOS versions with the optional RSP7000
upgrade kit. The RSP7000 kit upgrades a 7000 or 7010 router to the
equivalence of a 7507 or 7505.

Paul

M. Nabelsi  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Has anybody tried to upgrade 7010 to an IOS over 11.2.  In other words,
can
 other 7000 IOS work on 7010? 12.0 or over..
 Thanks in advance!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32782t=32780
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cisco 26xxx to run 8mbps [7:32628]

2002-01-21 Thread Paul Lalonde

[Insert tongue-in-cheek comment here]

Just a dumb guess, but I'd suspect that if you're looking into a satellite
carrier, they might have 1 or 2 ideas of their own as to what you'll need.

After all, they've probably done this once or twice in the past, being
satellite carriers and all.

You never know, but they might actually have sales people and technical
people who would gladly sell you this solution.

[End of tongue-in-cheek comment]

As always, free advice gets you exactly what you pay for. :-)

Paul

suaveguru  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 you are perfectly right if you are thinking in the
 point of view of Fiber but in the point of view of
 using a satellite carrier as transport than a single
 8mbps makes sense and if that's the case how are we
 going to solve it?


 regards,

 suaveguru
 --- Paul Lalonde  wrote:
  Hi there,
 
  When you say 8Mbps, what kind of service are you
  referring to?
 
  Frame Relay relies on T1, so the max you will get is
  1.5Mbps.  Are you
  looking for a solution with, say, 6 T1s to provide
  you with the 8Mbps you
  need?
 
  Or, are you looking for a solution that will allow
  you to do 8Mbps over
  Frame Relay over a single link?  I might be putting
  my foot in my mouth, but
  I don't think such a service exists. That's what ATM
  is for.
 
  A 2600 would likely be running out of breath with 6
  T1s, even fast-switched.
  Look at a 3640 for your needs.
 
  Paul
 
  suaveguru  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   hi all
  
   thanks for all the comments and tips given by some
  of
   you guys . It seems like a 26xxx cannot cater for
   8mbps traffic . If this is so what is the min
  cisco
   router that supports 8mbps and what interface this
   router will need?
  
  
   thanks
  
   suaveguru
  
   __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
   http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
 http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32785t=32628
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SNAM resources [7:32653]

2002-01-20 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi Dennis,

Glad to have another CCIE candidate on board!

However, I don't believe a CCIE track still exists where SNA is covered.
Apart from data-link switching (SDLC, etc.) I don't know how well that SNAM
course maps to the CCIE program. I could be totally off-base, though.

In any event, good luck with your studies!

Paul

Dennis Cooper  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi guys

 I have been lurking for some time and have found the group to be very
 informative.  I am studying towards CCIE and towards that end I am doing
the
 SNAM course and associated exam.  Is there a practice exam site someone
 could point me to?

 Regards

 Dennis Cooper
 CCNP/CCNP Security/CCDP/MCSE/CCSA




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32654t=32653
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cisco 26xxx to run 8mbps [7:32628]

2002-01-20 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi there,

When you say 8Mbps, what kind of service are you referring to?

Frame Relay relies on T1, so the max you will get is 1.5Mbps.  Are you
looking for a solution with, say, 6 T1s to provide you with the 8Mbps you
need?

Or, are you looking for a solution that will allow you to do 8Mbps over
Frame Relay over a single link?  I might be putting my foot in my mouth, but
I don't think such a service exists. That's what ATM is for.

A 2600 would likely be running out of breath with 6 T1s, even fast-switched.
Look at a 3640 for your needs.

Paul

suaveguru  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 hi all

 thanks for all the comments and tips given by some of
 you guys . It seems like a 26xxx cannot cater for
 8mbps traffic . If this is so what is the min cisco
 router that supports 8mbps and what interface this
 router will need?


 thanks

 suaveguru

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
 http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32656t=32628
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ATM Questions [7:32333]

2002-01-17 Thread Paul Lalonde

$1400-$1500 is a pretty good price.

The ATM module provides the ability to do LANE.

I know Optimum Data (www.optimumdata.com) had them for a really good price
at one time.

Paul

Ed Chuchaisri  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Also, what do you think it's the fair price for this?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32353t=32333
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Secure communications without an IPsec feature for IOS ? [7:31757]

2002-01-12 Thread Paul Lalonde

Christian,

A couple of primitive means of securing communications... but by no means as
secure as IPSEC.

1)  GRE tunnel interface with 'tunnel key' statement for basic protection of
encapsulated traffic. Follow this up with #2 for more security.
2)  Very restrictive access lists permitting only the other peer and denying
everything else (is this practical in an Internet usage scenario?)

Other than encryption and hashing algorithms, there's not much else (I
think!)

Regards,
Paul Lalonde

Cristian Piatnitchi  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi to everybody

 I am wondering if  is there any method to encrypt / secure the
 communcation between 2 routers without to use an IPsec based IOS. I am
 searchig for a cheaper sollution based on a basic IOS 12.0(5) for a 2600
 and IOS version 12.0(3c) for a Cisco 3640.

 cisc0 2600 ios image : c2600-i-mz.121-1
 cisco 3640 ios image : c3640-i-mz.120-3c

 Any advice would be appreciated
 Thanks in advance
 Cristian




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31757t=31757
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: REALLY old ios upgrade [7:31520]

2002-01-10 Thread Paul Lalonde

Steve,

Sounds like an old boot ROM monitor. Simply set the config register to 0x101
and reboot the router. This will allow you to boot from the ROMs and have
access to the flash memory for writing.

Commands are:  o/r  0x101
and:  i(to re-initialize)

Hope this helps!
Paul

steve skinner  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Chaps,

 i am trying to upgrade a router`s ios but am having some problems...

 it is version 10.2.5 ..

 when it boot`s i do the control break and i get into r-mon mode (i
 think)but the commands are different to the usuall...

 there is simply an L for load but don`t boot
 B for load from tftp and boot...

 but nothing about setting an ip address accesing the flash or anything..!!

 when i follow the on-screen i.e L c2500_l_d-112.bin 10.1.1.1 i get timed
 out..

 ANY IDEA`S ANYONE!!


 cheers in advance

 steve


 _
 Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
 http://www.hotmail.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31526t=31520
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT but related [7:31450]

2002-01-09 Thread Paul Lalonde

Mike,

Contact me offline.

Thanks!
Paul

Mike Sweeney  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I'm looking for something a bit odd but with good reason. I need an
original
 copy of Cisco ACS version 1.0  I'm willing to pay a small amount for this
so
 it's a chance to dig through the software archives and get a bit of beer
 money for a very old CD.

 The reason for wanting this old software is simple. I want to try Cisco's
 interface to their TACACS software. Currently I use a Linux flavor of
TACACS
 which works but I'm struggling with the logging which I want. Since 1.0
was
 TACACS only, it fits the bill perfectly. There had been one on Ebay but it
 was overpriced in my opinion.

 Thanks

 MikeS




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31455t=31450
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ISDN Stimulators [7:29787]

2001-12-20 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi there,

I had an ISDN stimulator, once.  When my ISDN performance wasn't as good and
satisfying as I thought it should be, I'd give it a little stimulation.

Kidding aside, if you're looking for an ISDN SIMULATOR, your best bet would
be to look into companies like Teltone, Emutel, etc.  Even Cisco 2600/3600
routers with ISDN interfaces can simulate the ISDN network, now. Fun stuff!

Paul

AlefTec PvtLtd  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi

 Can some one pls suggest me good ISDN Stimulators which i can use in my
labs
 for BCRAN.
 I am looking for following features:
 ISDN BRI and
 ISDN PRI

 Thanking u in advance.

 Merry Christmas




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29790t=29787
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ISDN Stimulators [7:29787]

2001-12-20 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi,

Try the following links (variety of ISDN network emulation for PRI and BRI)

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft/121
t/121t3/dt_q931.htm

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft/121
t/121t2/dt_qsig.htm

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft/121
limit/121x/121xi/121xi_3/dt_brint.htm

Hope this helps!
Paul

Robert  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Do you have any info on setting up a router as a simulated ISDN switch?

 Paul Lalonde  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Hi there,
 
  I had an ISDN stimulator, once.  When my ISDN performance wasn't as good
 and
  satisfying as I thought it should be, I'd give it a little stimulation.
 
  Kidding aside, if you're looking for an ISDN SIMULATOR, your best bet
 would
  be to look into companies like Teltone, Emutel, etc.  Even Cisco
2600/3600
  routers with ISDN interfaces can simulate the ISDN network, now. Fun
 stuff!
 
  Paul
 
  AlefTec PvtLtd  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Hi
  
   Can some one pls suggest me good ISDN Stimulators which i can use in
my
  labs
   for BCRAN.
   I am looking for following features:
   ISDN BRI and
   ISDN PRI
  
   Thanking u in advance.
  
   Merry Christmas




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29811t=29787
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: can't ping 'through' router..help? [7:29724]

2001-12-19 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi there,

From the looks of it, you've got private IP addresses on the inside of your
router, and public (Internet) addresses on the outside.

What's happening is traffic originating from the 192.168.2.x network is not
reachable by the Internet. Why?  The Internet does not allow routing to
private IP addresses. Private IP addresses include 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0,
192.168.0.0, etc. etc.

What you'll need to do is implement NAT (network address translation) on
your router to hide your internal IP addresses... mask them behind the
real outside interface of your router, so to speak.

Try something like this:

access-list 1 permit 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
ip nat inside source list 1 interface FastEthernet1/0 overload

int FastEthernet 1/0
 ip nat outside

int FastEthernet 0/1
  ip nat inside


Try this and see what happens!

Best of luck,
Paul Lalonde



to cisco new  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 hi...i have a question regarding router configuration.  i'm trying to set
up
 a 2621 router but am running into a problem, i can't ping through the
router
 (ie, no traffic going through the thing).  i can ping from the 2621 to a
dsl
 router, and from the 2621 to a pc i've set up on the lan, but i can't get
 traffic from the internet (dsl1) to the pc, and vice versa.  i've enabled
a
 default route out, as well as rip?  i'm kind of new at this so any help
 would be...well, helpful.  here's my config:

 !
 hostname myrouter
 !
 enable secret X
 enable password X
 !
 ip name-server 207.155.183.72
 !
 ip subnet-zero
 ip domain-lookup
 ip routing
 !
 interface FastEthernet 0/0
 no shutdown
 description will be connected to Internet(dsl 2)-not connected
 ip address 66.89.59.194 255.255.255.192
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip mroute-cache
 keepalive 10
 !
 interface FastEthernet 0/1
 no shutdown
 description connected to ethernet
 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip mroute-cache
 keepalive 10
 !
 interface Ethernet 1/0
 no shutdown
 description connected to Internet (dsl1)
 ip address 168.103.127.153 255.255.255.248
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip mroute-cache
 keepalive 10
 !
 router rip
 version 2
 network 66.0.0.0
 network 192.168.2.0
 passive-interface Ethernet 1/0
 no auto-summary
 !
 !
 ip classless
 !
 ! IP Static Routes
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet 1/0
 no ip http server
 snmp-server community public RO
 no snmp-server location
 no snmp-server contact
 !
 line console 0
 exec-timeout 0 0
 login
 transport input none
 !
 line vty 0 4
 login
 !

 thanks in advance...
 pete




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29725t=29724
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Need Help : Cisco 508-CS [7:29310]

2001-12-15 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi,

Actually, you had the right idea. But I think you mean:

router#config t
router(config)#line 1 8
router(config-line)#transport input all

Paul

Router Man  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Try these commands:

 router#config t
 router(config)#line vty 0 4
 router(config-line)#transport input all

 After you enable these commands you should be able to telnet to the
Terminal
 server using a port number.  For example telnet x.x.x.x 2001 will connect
 you to port 1 on your server. x.x.x.x is the ethernet port ip address that
 you have already configured
 Sam Ho  wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Dear all :
 
  I get a Cisco 508-CS recently. I can access the console and configurate
 the
  ethernet. I can use telnet to access this 508 console. I have two cisco
 2501
  router.
 
  I want to connect these 2501 console to this cisco 508-CS for reverse
  telnet. However, I am not able to locate any reference or sample
  configuration.
 
  Would anyone give me a hand ?
 
  Thanks
 
  Best Regards
 
  Sam Ho
  CCNA




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29324t=29310
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Serial tunneling [7:29070]

2001-12-13 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi Naafi,

Do you mean STUN or async tunneling?

I think that as long as you have enough flash memory and DRAM (you should be
fine) to run IP PLUS, you can do STUN and BSTUN.

Async tunneling doesn't require anything more than the base IP set, so yes,
you should be fine.

Paul

Naafi Matovu  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 HI.

 Can a 2610 with 32mb memory support serial tunneling...


 Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29097t=29070
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MAC Cookie problems with RSP7000 in a 7000 router [7:29098]

2001-12-13 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi,

I've recently installed an RSP7000 upgrade kit into an older 7000-series
router (with an RP1 and SP processor).

Everything worked fine with the original processors, but after I installed
the RSP7000 kit, I get the following message:

RSP-4-Cookie: Corrupt or missing Mac address cookie using random base
.5e03.6100

I've checked the archives, and it appears that the EEPROM that maintains the
MAC address table for this unit has gone south. The archives mentioned that
the RSP7000 would need to be replaced. Is there an easier way?

I have access to EEPROM programming equipment.. could this be easily
rectified on my own? This router is for my own home use in a CCIE lab
environment so I can't afford to put SmartNet on the unit just to get one
small chip replaced.

Please advise. Thanks!

Paul Lalonde




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29098t=29098
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :- [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Paul Lalonde

Chuck,

You didn't fail, buddy, you simply got one BIG step closer to achieving it.

It's all about learning, right?  I totally admire your approach, and I
applaud your determination.

The next one's got your name on it... count on it!

Paul


Chuck Larrieu  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my
 excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presented required
 detailed and intimate analysis. Alas, that was not the case.

 For those ninnies who complain that the one day lab devalues the process,
 all I can say is WRONG!
 The lab I saw was far more difficult than I remember from my previous
 attempt, and my previous attempt was NOT easy. In my first attempt, I did
 not see anything I couldn't do. This time, although FAR better prepared, I
 saw LOTS of things I couldn't do. IMHO, the one day format, with the
 elimination of the monkey tasks, allows Cisco to demand a lot more. The 26
 points previously allocated to terminal server setup, cabling, and
 troubleshooting all go someplace. WOW! The places they went! Previous
topics
 that were glossed over appeared in depth. Cisco continues to up the ante,
 and not always in ways one might expect. Some things I wouldn't have
 expected were there in spades. Probably THE major factor continues to be
 reachability. If you don't understand the implications of the given
network
 topology, and given interactions, you will be screwed.

 The topology presented was interesting. Amazing what one can do on a six
 router / two switch pod to wreak havoc and let you know what an idiot you
 are. Devious doesn't begin to describe it. Bootcamp and IPExpert - it
ain't
 the number of routers, boys!

 The e-mail feedback is amusing, but not particularly informative. I failed
 with a score greater than 20, meaning I can go back in 30 days for more
 humiliation, if I so desire. the breakdown percentages ( not scores )
would
 be of more interest if I were sitting with the proctor discussing the whys
 and the expectations. Otherwise it does me no god at all. for example, I
 solved a particular problem doing something a particular way. It worked
just
 fine in terms of the results. Yet on that section I scored very poorly.
What
 were they looking for?

 Fat fingers are still the major enemy for me, at least. It's no fun fat
 fingering on a Cat 5K. Not by any means. It also helps to be certain layer
 two stuff is done correctly.

 Well, debriefing will be fun. I have the topology duplicated in my home
lab,
 and I will enjoy analyzing the problems I saw in the real lab. No you
 can't telnet in to look. DON'T ASK!

 In terms of seating, it appears to me that there are now more racks in the
 lab, in San Jose, anyway. Half the seats are taken by those testing. The
 other half seem to be those used the previous day. the proctors crank
 through the idle racks, grading the previous day's results.

 One last thing. I know what CCO says, and I know what IOS I saw on my
rack.
 Rats. The advertised IOS would have gone a long way towards eliminating a
 particular problem I had. Not complaining, because any CCIE should have
been
 able to solve the particular puzzle no matter what the IOS involved. Just
 observing that some things are still in the process of change.

 The proctors are still the good folks I remember from last time. Too bad
we
 are not given the opportunity for more interaction afterwards. I would
 really have enjoyed discussing my results.

 Whelp, another time.

 Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28143t=28142
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Anybody have the updated boot ROMs for Cat5000? [7:27542]

2001-11-28 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi there,

Anybody have a line on the updated boot ROMs for the Cat 5000 Supervisor II?

I need new MCP and NMP boot ROM images to support CatOS 5.x. I've ordered
boot ROM upgrades for other platforms under contract for my customers in the
past, but is there a way for an end-user without a contract to order them?

I had heard that Cisco charged only for the cost of shipping. Is this true?

Regards,
Paul Lalonde




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27542t=27542
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IPSec VPN [7:26137]

2001-11-13 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi Jim,

Sounds like you're using an older IOS with flaky IPSEC code. Try upgrading
to one of the 12.2 releases. Solves a lot of IPSEC issues.  May also need a
policy route map on the router side (internal interface) to set the DF bit
to 0 (don't fragment). Will solve MTU issues with IPSEC between the two
boxes.

Paul Lalonde

Jim Bond  wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hello,

 We've got 3660 at central office and PIX at satellite
 ofices to do IPSec VPN. Sometimes PIX couldn't connect
 3660 and I have to reboot 3660 to make it work. I'm
 wondering if there is a easy way, say clear the
 connection, so I don't have to reboot the 3660?

 Thanks in advance.

 Jim

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
 http://personals.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26141t=26137
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Two default routes on the same router [7:25750]

2001-11-10 Thread Paul Lalonde

Randy,

What you want to do is implement policy routing with a route map. A route
map will allow you to direct your specific subnets' traffic to their
preferred gateway.

Check out the following link:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/36.html

Hope this helps!
Paul Lalonde

McHugh Randy  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Does anyone know if you can have two completley different default routes
and
 on the same router in totally two different subnets pointing to two
totally
 different gateways?
 For instance
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 25.13.240.1

 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 65.11.213.1

 Will the router parse each one separatley or will neither one of them
work?
 This is on a 2514 .

 Thanks
 Randy




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25766t=25750
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: HELP!! [7:25784]

2001-11-10 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hmm.. what platform?

clear crypto isakmpon an IOS router


clear crypto isakmp sa in config term mode on a PIX

Hope this helps,
Paul Lalonde

John Chang  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 To clear the IKE SA is the command clear isakmp or clear isakmp sa?
 Thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25788t=25784
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CISCO3000back-back [7:25076]

2001-11-02 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi Dave,

What specific model of 3000 routers do you have?

For the single-serial port models (3102, 3202, etc) the easiest way to get
this to happen is to pick yourself up a couple of cheap CSU/DSUs on eBay, a
couple of 72-0671 V.35 DTE cables (I believe they are also called CAB-NP2VT2
or something similar), and make yourself a back-to-back CSU/DSU cable.

Cheap Adtran 56/64 CSU/DSUs are probably your best bet.

This way, you'll be able to do point-to-point and Frame Relay back-to-back
configurations on your router.

Unfortunately, the older 3000s don't support DCE clocking, so back-to-back
cables aren't available for these units.

Hope this helps!
Paul Lalonde

Dave Sinclair  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I am a newbie to the router world and have acquired two old Cisco 3000
 routers.  I want to hook them up back to back via the serial ports for a
 home lab.  Does anyone have configuration info on this?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25094t=25076
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Upgrading IOS through Console Cable [7:24435]

2001-10-28 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi,

Given that you probably don't have any other modules in the router that you
can do this on (like Ethernet, Token Ring, or Serial)...

You can do this by configuring your AUX port for asynchronous routing and
connecting to it with your PC over a special null-modem cable.

The following link describes how to configure your PC to talk to a Cisco
router over a null-modem cable to the AUX port:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/103.html

You will need the mdmcisco.inf null-modem driver for your operating system.

Here are some basic tasks:

1. Configure a dial up networking connection on the PC. You'll need a
special modem driver to support PC-to-Cisco async connections over PPP.
Check out the link above. Assign a static IP address to the PC dial-up
adapter (ie. 192.168.0.1)

2. Configure the Cisco router AUX port to perform asynchronous routing. Do
the following:

line aux 0
  speed 38400
  parity none
  databits 8
  stopbits 1
  flowcontrol hardware
  modem inout
int async 0 (* you might need to use a different interface # - use 'show
line' to find your AUX port interface #)
  async mode dedicated
  async default routing
  ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0
  encapsulation ppp
  keepalive 5
  pulse 5
  no shutdown

3. With these two configuration steps, you should be able to 'dial' into
your Cisco router over the null-modem cable using PPP. At this point, you
will have a network-layer connection to the Cisco router and should be able
to TELNET, TFTP, and perform flash management (ie. uploading a new IOS
version).

IT WILL BE SLOW... BUT IT WORKS!

Paul Lalonde



Ali RETy  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 How can I upgrade IOS on 4000 Router through console connection.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2t=24435
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: No Keepalive [7:24446]

2001-10-28 Thread Paul Lalonde

I think this is because Ethernet / Fast Ethernet interfaces generate their
own keepalives and thus keep themselves up. Serial interfaces receive their
keepalives from the remote end and rely on return communications to bring
the interface up.

Paul


Tribavan Raina  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi..

 When we give no keepalive command on ethernet or fast ethernet ,the port
and
 line protocol come up but when we do the same thing for serial port why
 doesnt it work.

 May be it is a silly  question.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24447t=24446
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Spliting 2 B channels between 2 routers, how? [7:24187]

2001-10-26 Thread Paul Lalonde

John,

The message you're seeing might require you to remove the LDN from the 'isdn
spid' statement on each router. I know this is how you had it configured on
one router already, but try it on both.

Eg.  isdn spid1 6025551313

However, ensure that you configure only 'isdn spid1' on each router. Don't
configure 'isdn spid2' on either.

Check out the following link:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html

Let me know!
Paul


John Hardman  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi

 Well your advice and a timely bit of telco magic (they called me right
after
 I posted, don't know what they did, nor do I think they do either ;-) the
TE
 problems have been solved.

 However I am now getting this...

 00:03:55: %ISDN-4-INVALID_CALLEDNUMBER: Interface BR0, Ignoring call, LDN
 and Ca
 lled Party Number mismatch

 Number mismatch... humm... any ideas? I have tried playing with the dialer
 map number and the LDN number to no avail.

 BTW the config now matches to the advice from Paul.

 TIA
 --
 John Hardman CCNP


 Paul Lalonde  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Hi John,
 
  Two things I've noticed.
 
  If you use basic-ni as the ISDN switch, you should configure your 'isdn
  spid' statement as follows. Note that you include the LDN (local dial
  number) in the SPID with no area code:
 
  On router #1:
 
  isdn spid1 6025551313 5551313
 
  On router #2:
 
  isdn spid1 6025551212 5551212
 
  ALSO... *don't* configure 'isdn spid1' on router #1 and 'isdn spid2' on
  router #2. Instead, configure 'isdn spid1' on BOTH routers. Both routers
  should then pick up the relevant TEI from the ISDN switch. 'spid2' is
only
  valid if you've already defined 'spid1' on the unit.
 
  I've been successful doing this a number of times. Let me know how it
 works.
 
  Paul
 
 
  John Hardman  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Hi All...
  
   I have a question... I remember reading somewhere that it was possible
 to
   split two B channels of a BRI line between two routers. Here is my
  layout...
  
   ISDN Network -- Adtran NT1 ACE -- S/T#1 -- Router1 S/T#2 --
Router2
  
   Things work great if I config to have both B channels on one router,
or
  have
   just one B channel on one router. However when I split them, the first
   router to boot contacts the ISDN switch and gets two TE assigned, even
   though I have only one SPID config'ed on the BRI interface. When the
  second
   router contacts the switch to get a TE it gets an error, TE not
 assigned,
   terminal down state.
  
   Here are the relivent configs and show outputs. Any ideas what is a
miss
   here?
  
   TIA
  
   - Router 1 -
   interface BRI0
ip address 172.20.10.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
dialer idle-timeout 900
dialer map ip 172.20.10.2 name r3 broadcast 6025551212
dialer-group 1
isdn switch-type basic-ni
isdn spid1 6025551313
ppp authentication chap
  
   -- Show ISDN Status Router 2 -
   Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
   ISDN BRI0 interface
   dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
   Layer 1 Status:
   ACTIVE
   Layer 2 Status:
   TEI = 88, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State =
MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED
   TEI 88, ces = 1, state = 5(init)
   spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 sent, spid1 valid
   Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 0, tid = B
   Layer 3 Status:
   0 Active Layer 3 Call(s)
   Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0
   The Free Channel Mask:  0x8003
   Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0
  
   - Router 2 -
   interface BRI0
ip address 172.20.10.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
no ip route-cache
ip ospf demand-circuit
no ip mroute-cache
dialer idle-timeout 900
dialer map ip 172.20.10.1 name r4 broadcast 6025551313
dialer load-threshold 80 outbound
dialer-group 1
isdn switch-type basic-ni
 isdn spid2 6025551212 6025551212
ppp authentication chap
  
   -- Show ISDN Status Router 2 -
   Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
   ISDN BRI0 interface
   dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
   Layer 1 Status:
   ACTIVE
   Layer 2 Status:
   TEI = 82, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = TEI_ASSIGNED
   TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down)
   spid2 configured, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid
   Layer 3 Status:
   0 Active Layer 3 Call(s)
   Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0
   The Free Channel Mask:  0x8003
   Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0
  
  
  
   --
   John Hardman CCNP




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24240t=24187
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misc

Re: Spliting 2 B channels between 2 routers, how? [7:24187]

2001-10-25 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi John,

Two things I've noticed.

If you use basic-ni as the ISDN switch, you should configure your 'isdn
spid' statement as follows. Note that you include the LDN (local dial
number) in the SPID with no area code:

On router #1:

isdn spid1 6025551313 5551313

On router #2:

isdn spid1 6025551212 5551212

ALSO... *don't* configure 'isdn spid1' on router #1 and 'isdn spid2' on
router #2. Instead, configure 'isdn spid1' on BOTH routers. Both routers
should then pick up the relevant TEI from the ISDN switch. 'spid2' is only
valid if you've already defined 'spid1' on the unit.

I've been successful doing this a number of times. Let me know how it works.

Paul


John Hardman  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi All...

 I have a question... I remember reading somewhere that it was possible to
 split two B channels of a BRI line between two routers. Here is my
layout...

 ISDN Network -- Adtran NT1 ACE -- S/T#1 -- Router1 S/T#2 -- Router2

 Things work great if I config to have both B channels on one router, or
have
 just one B channel on one router. However when I split them, the first
 router to boot contacts the ISDN switch and gets two TE assigned, even
 though I have only one SPID config'ed on the BRI interface. When the
second
 router contacts the switch to get a TE it gets an error, TE not assigned,
 terminal down state.

 Here are the relivent configs and show outputs. Any ideas what is a miss
 here?

 TIA

 - Router 1 -
 interface BRI0
  ip address 172.20.10.1 255.255.255.0
  encapsulation ppp
  no ip route-cache
  no ip mroute-cache
  dialer idle-timeout 900
  dialer map ip 172.20.10.2 name r3 broadcast 6025551212
  dialer-group 1
  isdn switch-type basic-ni
  isdn spid1 6025551313
  ppp authentication chap

 -- Show ISDN Status Router 2 -
 Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
 ISDN BRI0 interface
 dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
 Layer 1 Status:
 ACTIVE
 Layer 2 Status:
 TEI = 88, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED
 TEI 88, ces = 1, state = 5(init)
 spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 sent, spid1 valid
 Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 0, tid = B
 Layer 3 Status:
 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s)
 Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0
 The Free Channel Mask:  0x8003
 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0

 - Router 2 -
 interface BRI0
  ip address 172.20.10.2 255.255.255.0
  encapsulation ppp
  no ip route-cache
  ip ospf demand-circuit
  no ip mroute-cache
  dialer idle-timeout 900
  dialer map ip 172.20.10.1 name r4 broadcast 6025551313
  dialer load-threshold 80 outbound
  dialer-group 1
  isdn switch-type basic-ni
   isdn spid2 6025551212 6025551212
  ppp authentication chap

 -- Show ISDN Status Router 2 -
 Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
 ISDN BRI0 interface
 dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
 Layer 1 Status:
 ACTIVE
 Layer 2 Status:
 TEI = 82, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = TEI_ASSIGNED
 TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down)
 spid2 configured, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid
 Layer 3 Status:
 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s)
 Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0
 The Free Channel Mask:  0x8003
 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0



 --
 John Hardman CCNP




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24208t=24187
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PPP Multilink studies - interesting results [7:21623]

2001-10-02 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hmm.. If this were the case, though, wouldn't I expect to only see 64Kbps of
bandwidth for a single user session on a 128K multilinked ISDN call?

Seems to me if the link were loaded up properly, you'd see the combined
aggregate.

Paul Lalonde

MADMAN  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Yes you verified what I have harped a few times, the added complexity
 of multilinking not to mention the several bugs I have encountered, is
 why I say just use CEF and load share per packet/destination.  Also
 multilinking nor CEF give your greater speed but you do have more
 bandwidth.  If you have a 2 lane verses a 4 lane highway the additional
 2 lanes won't enable you to go any faster but you can get twice as many
 cars to their destination.

   So yes two T1's will give you twice the thruput in x time but the
 links are still 1.5M no matter how you slice it.

   Dave

 Chuck Larrieu wrote:
 
  A couple of weeks ago there were a couple of discussions on this board
 about
  using multiple T1's to improve data throughput. If memory serves, there
 were
  two possible ways to do this: 1) per packet load sharing and 2) PPP
  multilink
 
  for no particular reason I decided to do a little study on PPP
multilink.
  Well, OK, I do have two particular reasons - an upcoming Lab and a
customer
  who is asking about this.
 
  So, I build a scenario as follows:
 
 serial0  token ring
  R6R5---R4
   ||
serial1
 
  to test throughput, I used extended ping, with multiple pings and
various
  size payloads, from a loopback on R4 to a loopback on R6.
 
  the routing protocol was EIGRP, done to assure per packet routing
between
 R6
  and R5 as a control.
 
  My results were interesting, to say the least. unexpected, but so
 consistent
  that there is no question, in my mind, anyway, about some of the
 assumptions
  many of us make about various load sharing and multiplexing options.
 
  a summary of the results are using the Cisco router reporting of
  min/avg/max round trip times - the middle number is the one to watch.
 
  packet size   PPP multilinksingle serial link configured as PPP
  multilink
 
  1000  24/24/13220/20/104
 
  1500  28/29/52   24/27/112
 
  500   16/19/64   12/13/104
 
  6412/14/60 4/7/104
 
  note that in every case, the single link, configured for PPP multilink,
is
  SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the dual link.
 
  Interesting. So I constructed some further experiments, using extended
 ping,
  multiple packets of variable size - range 64 to 1500:
 
PPP multilinkper packet load share   single T1
 
 8/17/136   4/17/136  4/17/144
 
  these figures are from over 15,000 pings per scenario, so it is not a
case
  of random chance here. there is no difference whatsoever between the
 results
  of a single serial link, per packet load sharing over two serial links,
and
  PPP multilink. what is most surprising is that a single serial
connection
  proves JUST AS FAST as a dual serial connection.
 
  Now what I conclude from this is an opinion that multiple T1's DO NOT
 really
  do much for you in terms of more bandwidth. At least for the kinds of
data
  flows I am able to generate in the lab.  Furthermore, PPP multilink is
  actually harmful to throughput. So I gotta ask - is load sharing really
  adding anything to the mix? Really? In real world scenarios and data
flows,
  where is it that you are gaining anything?
 
  Lastly, I set up a final scenario in which I sent 5000 byte packets.
this
  means fragmentation and reassembly would occur, because the MTU on all
wan
  interfaces is 1500 bytes. Here are the results when pinging 5000 times
 using
  a 5000 byte payload:
 
  single serial link: 64/66/168
 
  per packet load share: 64/64/168
 
  ppp multilink: 48/52/172
 
  note here that the load sharing scenario is slightly faster than the
single
  serial link, and that the ppp multilink is FAR AND AWAY faster that the
  other two. I suspect the reason for this is efficiencies gained under
the
  multilink scenario when fragmenting and reassembling the oversized
payloads
 
  In any case, I hope this presentation will lead to some good discussion
of
  bandwidth and results. would it be fair to suggest that peoples' efforts
to
  solve what they perceive as bandwidth issues by implementing multiple
WAN
  links is really a study in fruitless activity?
 
  Maybe I should have set up some IPX scenarios?
 
  Chuck
 --
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367

 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21704t=21623
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure vi

Emphasis on token ring switching on CCIE Lab [7:21715]

2001-10-02 Thread Paul Lalonde

Obviously, I don't want to get into NDA issues here, but I see that Cisco
has the 3900 token ring switch on the CCIE lab exam equipment list.

Is token ring switching considered an emphatic hands on topic for CCIE lab
preparation?  Anyone know how important this particular technology is in the
bigger scheme of things?

Paul Lalonde




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21715t=21715
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to upgrade ios on 2502 [7:18449]

2001-09-04 Thread Paul Lalonde

I think the original responder assumed that you had a second router that you
could use.

Theoretically, the only way to upgrade a single router like this would be by
removing the existing flash memory SIMM and replacing it with another flash
memory SIMM that had the IOS version you need.  Perhaps a friend may help?

At the least, you'll need a second router (and connect them back-to-back
with the serial ports) or a token ring hub / token ring NIC in your
workstation.

Paul Lalonde

ietobe  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 How to do it?

 Tks

 ietobe
 CCNP CCDP
 Jason  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Have you consider using the serial port ? ;-)
 
  ietobe  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Hi,
   does anybody know how to upgrade ios version on 2502, as you know
I
 do
   not have a token ring card on my pc or any other rouer. The router
does
  not
   provide copy xmodem: flash: command and does not have xmodem command
 under
   rom ios. How do I upgrade ios software from console port?
  
   TKS
  
   ietobe
   CCNP CCDP




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18457t=18449
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: % Connection refused by remote host

2001-02-20 Thread Paul Lalonde

Make sure 'transport input all' is set on the line you're trying to
reverse-telnet into.

Paul

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 I'm playing with 2511 terminal server and plugged a router and a firewall
on
 the async ports. But when I try to connect to the fire wall with 2001 I
get
 an error msg  "% Connection refused by remote host", I can ping it and I
can
 telnet to it via cross-over cable!!??.

 Any device.

 Regards,

 Tarry

 --
 Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Router 1700 showing Junk

2001-01-02 Thread Paul Lalonde

It certainly sounds like Hyperterminal settings need to be changed. Some
people fiddle with the config-register on their routers and end up changing
the baud rate (to 2400, 4800, etc.)

Word to the wise, though... if you change your baud rate in HYPERTERMINAL
then you have to 'disconnect' and 're-connect' for the settings to take
effect. Simply changing the baud rate didn't fix the communications problem
until I did the disconnect/re-connect.

Paul

Hitesh Pathak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Dear All,

 I'm having a problem with my 1700 series router. The problem is whenever I
 start my router it shows continously junk characters on the console.
 Nothing seems to be working. i have tried changing diff PC as well as
 console cable. Also I have checked for terminal settings like Baud rate ,
 stop bits , Flow control etceverything is perfect. I am using windows
 98 as a terminal (Hyper Terminal).

 Can anyone help me on this?can it be a DRAM corruption problem. Router
 has 8 mb of DRAM.

 many thanks in advance.



 
 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AUX Port

2001-01-02 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hey,

Throw in the following and see what happens:

speed 19200
modem type autoconfigure

this should set the AA on the modem.

Paul

"Austin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
92ssgt$rg2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:92ssgt$rg2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I have a Cisco 2511 Access Server.
 I want to connect to the 2511 via Modem. I have an old Motorola 14.4
modem.
 The aux port has the ffg config:

 line aux 0
 login
 password cisco
 modem inout
 transport input all

 I have the phone line plugged into the Modem (where it says TO WALL) and I
 have the Parallel connector (Modem) from Cisco's console kit plugged into
 the Modem Parallel Port. Then I have a regular Cisco console cable running
 from the modem to the aux port.

 When I call the number it just rings and rings. The modem does not answer.
 What am I doing wrong or what am I not doing?
 All help appreciated.


 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MZMaker utility (other way around though)

2000-12-11 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi Chris,

Just run PKUNZIP or any UNZIP engine against the image. It'll discard the
preamble but should generate the original IOS image as a result.

Paul

Chris McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

   Does anyone know if it's possible to decompress an
 mz IOS image?  How is it accomplished?  IIRC, it's
 GNUzipped with an executable tag at the lead in of the
 file.

 Thanks for the help,
 Chris M.

 --- Paul Lalonde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Sam,
 
  Images for the 800, 1000, 1600, 2600, 3600 ... are
  already compressed to run
  from DRAM. You can't use the MZMAKER utility on
  these images.
 
  MZMAKER was written specifically for the many 3000-
  and 2500-series systems
  in use by our groupstudy peers. The 3000- and
  2500-series routers don't have
  "compressed from the factory" images like these
  newer routers do.
 
  Regards,
  Paul
  [PCL]
 
 
 
  "Sam" wrote in message ...
  Hello friends
  Could anyone who has used the MZMaker utility to
  compress IOS images =
  tell me if I can use it to compress images for a
  1600 router.
  I have done it on a 2500 and it works great.
  My 1600 has 4MB Ram and 6MB Flash and am not able
  to load large images. =
  This is for a home lab so I am not too concerned
  about slow booting or =
  response.
  
  
  Thanks
  
  Sam
  
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
 http://shopping.yahoo.com/

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MZMaker utility

2000-12-10 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi Sam,

Images for the 800, 1000, 1600, 2600, 3600 ... are already compressed to run
from DRAM. You can't use the MZMAKER utility on these images.

MZMAKER was written specifically for the many 3000- and 2500-series systems
in use by our groupstudy peers. The 3000- and 2500-series routers don't have
"compressed from the factory" images like these newer routers do.

Regards,
Paul
[PCL]



"Sam" wrote in message ...
Hello friends
Could anyone who has used the MZMaker utility to compress IOS images =
tell me if I can use it to compress images for a 1600 router.
I have done it on a 2500 and it works great.
My 1600 has 4MB Ram and 6MB Flash and am not able to load large images. =
This is for a home lab so I am not too concerned about slow booting or =
response.


Thanks

Sam

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Newbie question on Multilinking

2000-12-09 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi there,

Just do the following:

multilink virtual-template 1

interface virtual-template 1
   encapsulation ppp
   ppp multilink
   ... assign serial link IP address (eg. ip address 192.168.255.249
255.255.255.252)

interface serial0
   no ip address
   encapsulation ppp
   ppp multilink

interface serial1
   no ip address
   encapsulation ppp
   ppp multilink

This will bind the two physical serial connections into a single "virtual
access" interface and enable Multilink PPP.

Paul

"Network Operations" wrote in message 90t36m$ug$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I want to multilink 2nos 64Kbps Leased Lines ( to aggregate 128Kbps) both
links connected on same cisco routers on either side (Model of Cisco router
is different on both sides) . pls let me know how this configuration can be
done  also if any particular IOS version is reqd. Is this function limited
to any model of cisco router or it is possible on any model.

Thanks in advance
Akshay




_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: WIC-2A/S Courier Modems?

2000-12-05 Thread Paul Lalonde

Greg,

Synchronous mode only works on a dedicated leased line connection. Ie. the
connection is always on, not switched like an analog dial call.

Paul

"Greg Reaume" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
90eh6d$j21$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:90eh6d$j21$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi There,

 I have a 1750 with a WIC-2A/S (2 Asynchronous/Synchronous Serial) and 2
USR
 Courier V.Everything modems attached via 2 DB25-SmartSerial cables.  The
 courier modems have a synchronous mode I'd like to use and was wondering
if
 anyone here has tried this configuration before.  I've tried putting the
 couriers in sync mode and using in-band v.25 dialer on the dialer
interface
 but I keep getting a message saying encapsulation failed in the debug.
I've
 tried both PPP  HDLC and got same message.

 I don't have too much experience with dial-up so I may be doing something
 wrong as far as configuration goes.  I've just done ISDN before.  If
anyone
 could provide a sample config or suggestion to get me on the right track
I'd
 really appreciate it.  I've already spent the last 3 days scouring CCO for
 some configs but all dial-up stuff with chat-scripts and the like are for
 asynchronous and I can't seem to find much on sync.  I'd like to use PPP
if
 possible and bond the two channels.

 TIA,

 Greg


 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: config-register 0x0000 on 2500

2000-12-03 Thread Paul Lalonde

If your config register is 0x0, you won't even be able to boot into a usable
IOS to change it... so don't bother trying "config term" !!!

Instead, at the  prompt, type:  o/r 0x2102
and then:  i

to re-initialize the router. Done!

Paul

"Jeff Duchin" wrote in message 904b9h$vi0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I just got into one of my 2500's and found the subject line config very
primitive and I'm wondering how the hell do I change it back to 0x2102???


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Memory in 2501

2000-11-22 Thread Paul Lalonde

Try single-sided 4MB or 16MB parity memory. I don't think the 2500s like
double-sided memory.

Paul

"Jeff Duchin" wrote in message 8vh0e0$sd4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What's up guys and gals. I'm upgrading the memory in 2 2501'a and one
of
them is not registering the new memory I've tried 8 and 16mb 72 pin
sims.

see below:

cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision A) with 1024K/1024K bytes of memory.
Processor board serial number 01289263
X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant.
Bridging software.
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
Authorized for Enterprise software set.  (0x0)
1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface.
2 Serial network interfaces.
32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of flash memory sized on embedded flash.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Perplexing: DHCP fails from Ethernet segment to Token Ring segment

2000-11-14 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hello all,

I've configured a Cisco 2513 router to do full bridging between its Ethernet
port and its Token Ring port. I'm using plain transparent bridging (bridge
'x' protocol ieee).

The network is broken down into two segments:  one switched 10/100 Ethernet
segment, and one Token Ring segment. The Cisco 2513 sits in between the two.

Currently, the majority of the workstations and servers (including an NT
Server running DHCP services) are on the Token Ring side.

Initially, I had problems bridging the two segments together because of
MAC-address bitswapping issues (Token Ring uses an inverted MAC address,
Ethernet doesn't).

These issues have been resolved by using the 'bridge
bitswap-layer3-addresses' command.

However, when Windows 9x/Windows NT workstations on the Ethernet side
attempt to obtain a DHCP address through the bridge (to the NT Server on the
Token Ring network), they fail to obtain IP addresses.

Statically assigning an IP address to these machines works fine!

I'm thinking that, perhaps somewhere in the DHCP REQ and ACK packets, the
Ethernet MAC addresses are not being handled properly on the NT Server DHCP
server. Could the IP address assignments be sent back to an invalid MAC
address?

Any help would be appreciated!

Paul Lalonde



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Pin outs.

2000-11-02 Thread Paul Lalonde

I believe they are exactly the same connector, but the RJ48 has a "key"
(notch) in the bottom corner. This prevents it from plugging easily into a
plain RJ-45 jack.

Paul
RAUNIYAR RAJEEV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Pine.GSO.4.21.0011020953250.9960-10@taiwan">news:Pine.GSO.4.21.0011020953250.9960-10@taiwan...
 I am trying to connect a RJ-48C to a RJ-45  what would the pinout be?
 Regards

 RR







 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: access server can't access the dial in- pls help :(

2000-10-18 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi,

Sometimes you need the 'modem type ...' or 'modem type autoconfigure' line
to allow the router to configure the proper lines on the modem.  After
finding my USR modem, my access server would answer automatically.

Hope this helps,
Paul

"Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Dear all,

 I have configured a access server as shown below, I attach my modem in
Asyn
 1 port and I can reverse telnet to it and the phone line got no problem.

 Besides, I used use a PC (win95) with a modem installed.  In win95, I use
 hyperterminal to connect the PC modem and tested the at command,.. it
work,
 so I used atdt 7 (my access server phone no) but I only heard the ring
 ring tone, the access server never accept it but I can see from the word
 RING RING on the access server's modem at command console.  What should I
 configure to let the access server modem pick up the call





 ###

 interface Ethernet0
  ip address 60.200.166.11 255.255.252.0
  no logging event subif-link-status
 !

 interface Async1
  ip unnumbered Ethernet0
  encapsulation ppp
  no logging event subif-link-status
  async dynamic address
  async mode interactive
  peer default ip address 60.200.166.15
 !
 ip classless
 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 60.200.164.1 permanent
 !
 line con 0
 line 1
  password abc123
  autoselect ppp
  login
  modem InOut
  transport input all
  stopbits 1
  speed 2400
  flowcontrol hardware

 ==
 De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
 is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
 onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
 de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
 ==
 The information contained in this message may be confidential
 and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
 receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
 herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


 ==

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VPN 3DES ON 2MB Link with 25XX

2000-08-04 Thread Paul Lalonde

Hi Christophe,

The 2500-series routers would *NOT* be capable of performing 3DES processing
with a 2MB link. To put it into perspective, I recently spoke to an engineer
from Cisco and he confirmed that one of the higher end routers, the 3640,
will only perform 3DES encryption at a rate of 512Kbit. The 3640 is easily
10+ times faster than the 2500 series.

As well, a 1600-series router performing only DES (56-bit) encryption is
only capable of about 64kbit/sec processing. This router is comparable in
performance to the 2500-series. 3DES processing, then, would be far less and
would be VERY poor.

Therefore, the 2500 wouldn't even be capable of managing 64 Kbit or 128 Kbit
of 3DES processing. Your 2Mb link would be better served by something like
the Cisco VPN Concentrator 3005 or similar.

Regards,
Paul Lalonde, CCNP

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hello,

 I wish to setup a 3DES VPN between two sites (a local and a remote site)
on
 a 2MB serial link using 2 2502 cisco routeurs. I will have 30 people
 working on the remote site using telnet session, NT file and print with
 servers in the local site.

 Do you think the 25XX could handle such calculation (3DES processing) for
 such amount of user. If yes is someone already setup such thing ?

 regards,
 Christophe.

 ___
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---


___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]