RE: strange question

2002-07-22 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



do you have log in locally 
rights on the owa box?



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
We know that communication is a 
problem, but the company is not going to discuss it with the employees. 
(ATT Long Lines Division) 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:54 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: strange 
  question
  ive installed e5.5 
  sp4 on my test lan
  i then upgraded it 
  to e2k sp2
  i installled sp3 
  today..
  
  ever since it went 
  to e2k i cannot logon via OWA
  it prompts me for 
  username and password, but never accepts it..
  anyone else ever 
  see this?List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: IT staff behavior

2002-07-16 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: IT staff behavior





Sure wouldn't be acceptable in my organization - but we require users to enter trouble tickets so responses can be tracked.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


I owe the public nothing. -- J.P. Morgan 



-Original Message-
From: Andrew J. Lund, MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: IT staff behavior



This is a query on protocol.





My girlfriend calls me and tells me that her Outlook has lost several personal calendar items. This caused a double-booking of conference rooms and much pain and suffering. She is on a Mac with Outlook and I would imagine the servers are Win2K/Exchange 2K but I'm not certain.




At any rate, she tells the helpdesk people that she is missing items among other things. They come look at it, shrug their shoulders and say they'll be back later. They never return. In fact, she calls them and they forgot all about her problem. (Others have this problem as

well.) I don't know about you but if someone tells me something is missing from an email DB, I get right on it to figure out the issue (which is usually larger than just a few things missing).




I told her that this is NOT acceptable IT protocol. I would like to think that a smooth network is one where workstations and servers are humming, no one has problems with the equipment or software, backups are working, and security is tight. Am I wrong here? Am I overreacting when I tell her that she needs to bring down the hammer on these so-called network professionals?? She is in no position to do anything but complain to her boss who doesn't seem to care much...

Your thoughts...





~~


Andrew J. Lund, MCSE


Systems Manager


IEA - San Francisco


~~



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: OWA to Multiple Exchange 5.5 Server from one IIS4 Server (Que stio n)

2002-07-08 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



It will automatically allow 
this as long as the users from the other domains have the rights to login 
locally to the IIS box.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
The beatings will continue until 
morale improves... 

  
  -Original Message-From: David Elebute 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 
  11:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA to 
  Multiple Exchange 5.5 Server from one IIS4 Server (Questio 
  n)
  
  Does 
  anyone know where I can find some documentation on how to setup OWA pointing 
  to several different Exchange 5.5 servers while only residing on one IIS 4.0 
  server? I have been looking through TechNet with no success. Please advise if 
  you know how to accomplish.
  
  All 
  responses are greatly appreciated,
  
  David 
  Elebute
  Director of 
  MIS
  SuperClubs
  (MCP,CCNA)
  
  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Groupwise Migration and tasks

2002-06-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Groupwise Migration and tasks





Lotus bloats strikes again!!!


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


I owe the public nothing. -- J.P. Morgan 



-Original Message-
From: Thomas Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re:Groupwise Migration and tasks



The person you have sent mail to has been migrated from GroupWise to Exchange. The message has been automatically forwarded to your addressee.

Please update your Frequent Contacts, Personal Address Book, and any groups you may have with this persons email address. You may do this by deleting the person's email address and then add them back to your lists or groups by selecting the person's email address from the Novell GroupWise Address Book. 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: filtering spam

2002-05-31 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Check out Message Inspector 
from Elron SW. It "reads" the email and scores it based on criteria you 
set. So even if the word sex was in the body it could potentially flag it 
as spam.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
electrical system, which is good, 
because electricity can kill you. -- Dave Barry, "The Taming of the Screw" 


  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:58 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: filtering 
  spam
  Mail 
  Essentials doesn't have that option, but I'll be looking for that on what I'm 
  migrating to. The only reason the user was ticked was because management 
  sent out a memo stating that IT would be blocking those kinds of 
  emails..mgmt didn't have a clue  of course didn't ask for my input on 
  the wording of the memo :) Don't ya just love mgmt?
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 
2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
filtering spam

You can only do so 
much. The user needs to do their part too. If you are 
getting spam with no text, block the "no subject" or "no body" 
messages. I do that already

-Original 
Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 
2002 11:20 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
filtering spam


You 
are absolutely right Martin, the domains are forged, change frequently  
the from email addresses are faked also. Get some kind of content 
filtering software. Currently I use Mail Essentials from GFI, but will 
be migrating to a Linux flavored software that is going to be much more 
configurable when I learn how to configure it 
:)



I have 
a Sherry Abercrombie Porn Filter list  you're absolutely right, it is 
entirely too disgusting to post publicly. Just wait until someone at 
your companyreceives a porn email that has NO text in it at all that 
will trigger the filtering, it's just a bunch of pictures, ouch. I 
took a lot of heat on that one until I got the person that received it to 
understand that our content filtering is only for text, not pictures. 

-Original 
  Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 
  2002 8:03 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  filtering spam
  
  You 
  are wasting time. Most of the domains are forged and they change every 
  day.
  
  I 
  have recently started playing with content filtering. I pulled out a copy 
  of Webshield SMTP and are blocking by keywords in the subject. It is 
  working great. Ill bet we are 
  blocking about 75% of our focus which is porn 
  SPAM.
  
  
  
  I am 
  now working on the Martin Blackstone Porn Filter list, buts its too 
  disgusting to post publicly.
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 
2002 1:02 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
filtering spam

We use a third 
party product but it's manual entry too.If we get porn spam, 
then I will block the domain. We're up to about 60 and that seems 
to have reduced it to very small trickle. A lot of cz 
domains.



-sp

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 
  2002 12:58 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  filtering spam
  
  Isn't it 
  easier to block @aol.com at the IMS 
  instead?
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 
2002 
12:40 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Re: 
filtering spam

Wowza. How about 
teaching your users all about the delete key 
instead?



And 
thinking about content filtering 
software.



And web 
sites? You mean domain names, 
right?

  
  - 
  Original Message - 
  
  From: JFadigan 
  
  
  To: 

Messages Truncated after third reply

2002-05-17 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Hey Folks - Exch 5.5 sp4 on 
win 2k.

Seeing a problem where 
message threads are truncated after the third reply.

I have 20 meg limits on 
sending but these are not even close to that - less than one meg and it does not 
appear to be size at all but number of replies.

Is there a setting I have 
screwed up somewhere?

Thanks!


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On the other hand, you have different 
fingers. -- Steven Wright 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Dumb question

2002-05-13 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



nope.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
The judge asked, "What do you plead?" 
I said, "Insanity, your honour, who in their right mind would park in the 
passing lane?" -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Scot Parsons 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:32 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Dumb 
  question
  I should probably 
  know the answer to this, so be gentle.
  
  Does Exch. 5.5 
  Enterprise edition require NT Server Enterprise edition?
  
  ThanksList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange move....was...RE: Exchange newbie

2002-05-10 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



That is correct and after 
the Outlook Address book is installed you need to Right Click on the contacts 
folder and under Properties - Outlook Address book make sure there is a check in 
the box next to Show this folder as an email address book.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I eat swiss cheese from the inside 
out. -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Ben Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:49 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  movewas...RE: Exchange newbie
  
  Have you 
  double-checked that the Outlook Address Book is installed on the client as a 
  service? IIRC, in order for the contacts folder to be displayed as an 
  address book, that service has to be installed. Something to check at 
  least.
  
  
  Ben 
  Winzenz, MCSE
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator
  Peregrine 
  Systems
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: John Clark 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:45 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  movewas...RE: Exchange newbie
  
  Maybe 
  someone could explain how the contact lists are different?
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:28 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  movewas...RE: Exchange newbie
  
  
  I don't 
  remember what all you've done. 
  
  
  
-Original 
Message-From: John 
Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:33 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Exchange 
movewas...RE: Exchange newbie
So my 
exchange move is done...almost... I went from 5.5 to 2000 with a hop, skip 
and a thump. I guess that's what happens when you work for a 
department at a University that doesn't want to pay for training or 
testing!

I 
have a couple of problems I was hoping that someone could easily 
answer.

First 
the contact lists from the Outlook Address book do not work. Global 
address list does work. When you go to the address book and select 
Address book there are no entries, and when you select Contacts it says the 
list could not be displayed. The contacts folder associated with the 
address list could not be opened; it may have been moved or deleted, or you 
do not have permissions

Any 
help would be appreciated, TIA
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Can I Disable OOA Forwarding Rules

2002-04-25 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



you can not allow oof to 
the internet - but then no one on the internet gets them. A good 
thingIMHO.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+IT ManagerSpecial 
Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  April 25, 2002 2:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Can I Disable OOA Forwarding 
  Rules
  Server: WinNT4 SP6 Exch 5.5 SP4 Outlook 98/2000
  Does anyone know how to disable the O_ut of O_ffice 
  Assistant's capability to automatically forward emails to another address?
  We have had some problems with people setting OOA on and forwarding their 
  mail to a "free" mail service.Some services have 
  restrictions on the size of the email they will accept (2MB). Somebody sends 
  somebody the latest goofy MPEG file and it gets forwarded and rejected over 
  and over and, well, you know the rest of the story
  Thanks in advance.
  Dan MunleyList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: A little fine tuning help please...

2002-04-17 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



dude - it is the 
route.

you are not using DNS at 
this point because telnetted directly to the server.

The server is clueless 
about what the native domain is so it is considering everything a 
relay.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I used to own an ant farm but had to 
give it up. I couldn't find tractors small enough to fit it. -- Steven Wright 


  
  -Original Message-From: Michael Reid 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 
  11:41 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: A 
  little fine tuning help please...
  
  Sorry, it's 2K. I've 
  just worked on MX, so I'm going to see how that one fairs. Then I'll do the 
  route thing. One adjustment at a time 
  :]
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 17, 2002 2:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: A little fine tuning help 
  please...
  
  
  I'm sorry. Is 
  this Exch 55 or 2K. Since you didnt say, I will assume you have the same as I 
  do.
  
  In the Internet 
  Mail Connector you need to have the domain added under the routing 
  tab.
  
-Original 
Message-From: Michael 
Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:28 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Re: A 
little fine tuning help please...

I'm working the DNS part out 
with Jeremiah Watson (earlier response). What are you refering to by routing 
in IMS?



Michael

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: Martin Blackstone 
  
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  
  Sent: 
  Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:02 PM
  
  Subject: RE: A 
  little fine tuning help please...
  
  
  
  Two things. 
  Check your DNS.
  
  Also make 
  sure you have added the domain under Routing in the 
  IMS
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 
17, 2002 9:55 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: A little fine tuning help 
please...

So this is what 
I get when I send email to my domain:



 
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(reason: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED])



 
- Transcript of session follows -... while talking to 
scotiazone.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED]550 5.1.1 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]... User 
unknown

The funny thing 
is that this is a reply from a mail I sent out using the 
mail.scotiazone.com/exchange OWA. It mailed it out fine, when I replied, 
I get this. Any ideas? The user exists, I logged in through OWA no 
problem. 



Michael
List Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: A little fine tuning help please...

2002-04-17 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Exchange needs to know -- 
not windows - don't know E2K - on 5.5 it is the routing 
tab.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
The shortest distance between two 
points is under construction. -- Noelie Alito 

  
  -Original Message-From: Michael Reid 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 
  11:20 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: A 
  little fine tuning help please...
  Ok, that makes a bit of sense. I'm using W2K, 
  where do I tell it who it belongs to?
  
  Michael
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Zangara, Jim 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:37 
PM
Subject: RE: A little fine tuning help 
please...

dude - it is the 
route.

you are not using DNS 
at this point because telnetted directly to the server.

The server is clueless 
about what the native domain is so it is considering everything a 
relay.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I used to own an ant farm but had 
to give it up. I couldn't find tractors small enough to fit it. -- Steven 
Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Michael Reid 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 
  2002 11:41 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: A little fine tuning help please...
  
  Sorry, it's 2K. 
  I've just worked on MX, so I'm going to see how that one fairs. Then I'll 
  do the route thing. One adjustment at a time 
  :]
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 17, 2002 2:29 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: A 
  little fine tuning help please...
  
  
  I'm sorry. Is 
  this Exch 55 or 2K. Since you didnt say, I will assume you have the same 
  as I do.
  
  In the 
  Internet Mail Connector you need to have the domain added under the 
  routing tab.
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 
10:28 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: A little fine tuning 
help please...

I'm working the 
DNS part out with Jeremiah Watson (earlier response). What are you 
refering to by routing in IMS?



Michael

  
  - 
  Original Message - 
  
  From: 
  Martin Blackstone 
  
  
  To: 
  MS-Exchange 
  Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: 
  Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:02 PM
  
  Subject: 
  RE: A little fine tuning help 
  please...
  
  
  
  Two things. Check your 
  DNS.
  
  Also make sure you have added the 
  domain under Routing in the IMS
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, 
April 17, 2002 9:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: A 
little fine tuning help please...

So this is 
what I get when I send email to my 
domain:



 - The 
following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(reason: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED])



 - 
Transcript of session follows -... while talking to 
scotiazone.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED]550 
5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... 
User unknown

The funny 
thing is that this is a reply from a mail I sent out using the 
mail.scotiazone.com/exchange OWA. It mailed it out fine, when I 
replied, I get this. Any ideas? The user exists, I logged in through 
OWA no problem. 



Michael
List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter 
and FAQ

RE: Content Filtering Software - Cameo?

2002-04-17 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Content Filtering Software - Cameo?





We use IM Message inspector from Elron. Still in testing phase -- but it looks promising. But EXPENSIVE.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human intelligence long enough to get money from it. 



-Original Message-
From: Matt Dodge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Content Filtering Software - Cameo?



We are currently running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and have been having problems with questionable e-mails. I would appreciate any of your thoughts/experiences with content filtering software. We currently own MicroData's Melia Exchange reporting product and I was wondering if anyone had used another product of theirs - Cameo. Cameo is their content filtering software. I am grateful for any information/help.

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: no email but still able to modify GAL

2002-04-12 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Thanks - will try that - 
Appreciate the assist.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I bought a dog the other day...I 
named him Stay. It's fun to call him... "Come here, Stay! Come here, Stay!" He 
went insane. Now he just ignores me and keeps typing. -- Steven Wright 


  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 
  5:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: no email 
  but still able to modify GAL
  Sure, if you restrict what they can send to, you can block it 
  all. Not that I can imagine wanting to do that, but the theory sounds 
  alright.
  
  
  Don 
  ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 
2002 7:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
no email but still able to modify GAL
Delivery restrictions 
on the mail box would not allow them to send email within the 
org?



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I was born by Caesarian 
section...but not so you'd notice. It's just that when I leave a house, I go 
out through the window. -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 
  3:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: no 
  email but still able to modify GAL
  DeliveryRestrictions on the IMC is you're looking to block 
  outbound internet mail or set delivery restrictions on the individual 
  mailbox.
  
  Don 
  ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, 
    Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 
11, 2002 6:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: no email but still able to modify 
GAL
Ok - this is a 
weird one.

I have an account 
that needs to be an owner of some DL's in the GAL. But we do not 
want them sending email from this account at all.

I have been playing 
with permissions but if I get where they can't send - then they can't do 
anything else.

I removed all of 
the email address including the x400 but it still can 
send.

Any 
ideas?


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I was going 70 miles an hour 
and got stopped by a cop who said, "Do you know the speed limit is 55 
miles per hour?" "Yes, officer, but I wasn't going to be out that 
long..." -- Steven Wright 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: IIS on an Exchange 2000 box

2002-04-12 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: IIS on an Exchange 2000 box





SecureIIS!!!


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human intelligence long enough to get money from it. 



-Original Message-
From: daniele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: IIS on an Exchange 2000 box



Seeing one must use IIS on a Windows 2000 box running Exchange 2000 if one wants to use the Outlook Web Access.

What is the proper method to lockdown IIS under this environment?

I know of the lockdown utility, however is that the best method?

Daniele
.+-

@A+a0 z[lpjoZ \ૅzm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: RE : Norton Gateway 2.5

2002-04-12 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: RE : Norton Gateway 2.5





We use the gateway in conjunction with Antigen. That gives us four separate scanning engines and the ability to modify the routing of email on the fly without having to wait for DNS changes.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human intelligence long enough to get money from it. 



-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE : Norton Gateway 2.5



Yumm fish tacos.
M
PS it's friday
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:20 AM
Subject: RE: RE : Norton Gateway 2.5



Did someone mention fish tacos???


-Original Message-
From: Gérard Dumazet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE : Norton Gateway 2.5



For my knowledge of your language : what is the meaning of start on fish tacos I have seen that elsewhere on this list !

-Message d'origine-
De : John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 11 avril 2002 16:18
À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Objet : RE: Norton Gateway 2.5


Let's not get started on Fish Tacos.


John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5



well! I'm a meat and potatoes man myself, but a little fish does no harm...


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 03:14
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5



What kind of produce. I'm more into veggies than fruit.


-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Norton Gateway 2.5



Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm






__
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Viewing contacts

2002-04-12 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



tools - services - then the 
advanced tab - open these other mailboxes - will give u full access to the 
mailbox including all inboxes and all subfolders.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yesterday I parked my car in a 
tow-away zone...when I came back the entire area was missing. -- Steven Wright 


  
  -Original Message-From: Mathews, James 
  E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:34 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Viewing 
  contacts
  Thanks for your help. BTW got that I can't do it I will make the 
  pub. I don't have an email accounts under Tools unless I am missing 
  something. 
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:28 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Viewing 
contacts

Ah. No, it can not 
be done. Not that way. If they have admin rights on the others, they can 
open the actual mailbox via Tools/Email Accounts, but you do not want users 
doing that. I would suggest having them post those contacts in a pub, and 
control perms on that pub. Bon Chance!

-Original 
Message-From: Mathews, 
James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:22 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Viewing 
contacts


I am 
not following you sorry. Maybe not explaining well enough. We 
have some admin people who send out group emails to clients. These 
admins go through the partners contacts to get the addresses. So I 
havegiven permission to the admins to read and view the 
contact lists. One of the partners puts nothing in his contact list 
everything is in a sub folder of the contact list by company name he deals 
with.



If I 
go to file open... open other users folder... I do not have the option to 
open sub folders.



Now if 
your saying it cant be done that's cool and I do understand. 




I was 
not following open it via Email Account part. Maybe explain what you 
mean and I will be good to go.



Thanks 
for your help 

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:19 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Viewing contacts
  Why 
  don't you open it via Email Accounts? I don't think you can open 
  subfolders through "Open User's Folder"
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:14 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Viewing 
  contacts
  
  
  I need to view a contact list 
  that is in a sub folder of the main contact 
folder.
  
  
  
  when I go to open other user 
  folders it does not show the sub folder.
  
  
  
  if I open just the main 
  contact folder it does not show everyone in the sub 
  folders.
  
  
  
  OUTLOOK 2k 
  
  
  Windows 
  2K
  
  Exchange 
  5.5
  
  
  
  
  
  thanks
  
  
  
  James
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Off Subject - DNS Set Up

2002-04-11 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Off Subject - DNS Set Up





You are correct. DNS is a stupid human trick used to translate IP addresses into something we can actually remember such as www.mycompany.com.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Allen Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Off Subject - DNS Set Up



Would someone let me know if I am headed down the right path on my set up of DNS?


I have a book on Win2K Server and have read many times the chapter on DNS, and have gone through all of the sets in the book. ( or so I think )

What I want is to show www.mycompany.com instead of 65.65.65.65, and I am thinking that DNS is what shows the world the correct information. Am I on the right path with looking into DNS or is this done by some other means?

Thanks,


Allen


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Sent Items when using Send on Behalf Of

2002-04-11 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Sent Items when using Send on Behalf Of





http://victori.hypermart.net/


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



 -Original Message-
 From: Tim Boswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:40 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Sent Items when using Send on Behalf Of
 
 
 I hate to play 'me too' but I've been trying to figure out 
 how to do this for ages - if someone out there's got a toy to 
 do it I'd hugely appreciate a copy or a URL.
 
 TIA
 
 Tim Boswell
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 08 April 2002 12:20
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Sent Items when using Send on Behalf Of
 
 
 Apologies but someone contacted me about an add-in for 
 Outlook that would, when someone sends on behalf of another 
 user, write items to their Sent Items folder as opposed to 
 the primary mailbox's Sent Items folder. Sadly, I've 
 forgotten who it was, so could you drop me a line
 again:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Kevin 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and 
 FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





no email but still able to modify GAL

2002-04-11 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Ok - this is a weird 
one.

I have an account that 
needs to be an owner of some DL's in the GAL. But we do not want them 
sending email from this account at all.

I have been playing with 
permissions but if I get where they can't send - then they can't do anything 
else.

I removed all of the email 
address including the x400 but it still can send.

Any 
ideas?


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I was going 70 miles an hour and got 
stopped by a cop who said, "Do you know the speed limit is 55 miles per hour?" 
"Yes, officer, but I wasn't going to be out that long..." -- Steven Wright 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: no email but still able to modify GAL

2002-04-11 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Delivery restrictions on 
the mail box would not allow them to send email within the 
org?



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I was born by Caesarian section...but 
not so you'd notice. It's just that when I leave a house, I go out through the 
window. -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 
  3:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: no email 
  but still able to modify GAL
  DeliveryRestrictions on the IMC is you're looking to block 
  outbound internet mail or set delivery restrictions on the individual 
  mailbox.
  
  Don 
  ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 
2002 6:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: no 
email but still able to modify GAL
Ok - this is a weird 
one.

I have an account that 
needs to be an owner of some DL's in the GAL. But we do not want them 
sending email from this account at all.

I have been playing 
with permissions but if I get where they can't send - then they can't do 
anything else.

I removed all of the 
email address including the x400 but it still can send.

Any 
ideas?


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I was going 70 miles an hour and 
got stopped by a cop who said, "Do you know the speed limit is 55 miles per 
hour?" "Yes, officer, but I wasn't going to be out that long..." -- Steven 
Wright 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise

2002-04-04 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise





Total cake - 15 minute install.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


I was trying to daydream, but my mind kept wandering. -- Steven Wright 



-Original Message-
From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise



Have not tried, but http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q170280


-Original Message-
From: arae_net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 14:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise



has anyone upgraded Exchange 5.5 Standard Edition to Enterprise? It is supposed to be straight forward and retain all the configurations. Please offer any suggestions if applicable. thanks

JR




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: pst troubles, please help

2002-04-04 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: pst troubles, please help





Very possibly way off - but have you double checked file permissions and attributes? If the file was backed up to CD for instance it might still be read only. Try to take ownership of the file? 

Basics I know but you never know.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help



Compacted the file recently?
Did ScanPST do anything ?


-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 22:46
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help



Windows Explorer.


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pst troubles, please help



Where do you see the 584megs, inside of Outlook or Windows Explorer ?


-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 16:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: pst troubles, please help



I've got an evil .pst file that won't open now that I've reformatted the PC and recreated the Outlook account. This .pst file is approx. 584MB, not exceeding the 2GB limit... But, it's crashing everything that tries to get to it. When I open the mailbox, after approx. 7 minutes of cranking away at 100%CPU utilization, then I try to open this Personal Folders file, I get a message that I don't have permission to open it. What? I wonder if there's a way to get into this file? I've searched TechNet, Google, my archive of messages from this list. Anyone have a suggestion? Thanks in advance.



[EMAIL PROTECTED]





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: RE : datbase

2002-04-01 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Did the Exmerge here as 
well - Went great except for anyone with server based rules. Seemed to 
corrupt the space where exchange stores them. Had to export the rules - 
blast them - and re-import.

Other than that I have a 
clean store and getting solid backups - totally worth it!!


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+IT ManagerSpecial 
Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:08 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: RE : 
  datbase
  i 
  wound up having to delete my pub.ebd and create a new one.
  thank god no folders were homed there.
  

-Original Message-From: Gérard Dumazet 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
3:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE : 
datbase

I had the same pb 
recently and creating new server was the solution with MS 
support


-Message 
d'origine-De: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé: mercredi 27 mars 2002 
15:56À: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesObjet: 
RE: datbase


1018 
errors are internal problems with the page structure of the JET database. It 
prevents the database being backed up simply because your backup program 
figures there's no point in backing up a bad database. There's not usually a 
fix for this. On occasions, I've had to create a new mailbox server in the 
site and move all mailboxes off. It's usually (although not always) down to 
a problem with your disk. You don't have any caches set on your disk 
controllers do you?



Kevin

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 27 March 2002 14:01To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: 
  datbase
  
  ok
  
  
  
  I did what MS 
  said..
  
  exmerged it 
  out
  
  created a new 
  DB
  
  exmerged it back 
  in
  
  
  
  the store runs, 
  and people work, but i cannot back it up
  
  I get this in the 
  event log
  
  MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted 
  page (118500) with error -1018. Please restore the databases from a 
  previous backup
  
  ?
  
  
  Michael 
  Ross
  Panduit 
  Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland 
  Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 
  60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange 
  Administrator
  
  
  List Charter 
  and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: datbase

2002-03-27 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



bet this is what caused my 
corruption as well.

When the firmware is 
flashed is there any potential for data loss? I have an identical machine 
I can build to as a restore server if needed.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I'm moving to Mars next week, so if 
you have any boxes... -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  March 27, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
  We 
  had the same problem here. Upgraded the firmware and drivers and have 
  not seen it since. Thought the firmware flash and driver update was not 
  as "straight forward" as the instructions stated. It took a couple of 
  tries to get the procedure right.
  
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:24 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
See Don Ely's response. He's the one that had a problem and solved 
via an update of the firmware. 

  -Original Message-From: Chris Norris 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:17 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  What model Dell server? The 2450? The problem I am 
  aware of with the Dell raid controllers on this specific server concerns 
  the firmware, not the drivers. Dell says you must upgrade the 
  firmware before loadingW2k, not just Exchange.
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
2:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
datbase
Are you sure you have the latest drivers for the raid 
controller? I remember somebody having a problem with Dells and 
exchange. Might want to check the Dell site and look specifically 
for Exchange. 

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 
  11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  datbase
  ok
  this is a dell server
  i load array manager
  and my virtual disk shows
  Read policy : Read-Ahead
  Write Policy : Wrtie- Thru
  Cache Policy : Direct I/O
  
  I dont see any alarms about the disk 
  hardware...
  

-Original Message-From: Rob 
Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
March 27, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: datbase
So you have exmerged out and recreated on the 
same hardware? As someone else said 1018's are likely to be 
caused by hardware problems. Check out the caching on your 
controller, and does your controller write anything to it's own 
internal event logs?? Don't some HP NetRAID cards do 
that? Maybe other vendors do similar?

Thanks
Rob


-Original Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 
2002 15:52To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: datbase
True, but the problem is I don't have another server 
to put up in that site. So Ill have to track 
down the hardware issue I did an isinteg 
-pri -test alltests It came back with all 
Zero's .. Like it should. 
-Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:30 
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: datbase 
Trouble is of course that you can spend ages trying 
to find it. I believe (through my experience with 1018 errors), even 
if you find the hardware problem the structure may still be 
corrupted so you will still have to move data off of the disk. My 
view is that you might as well do this from the start. Easiest way 
to do that is to add a mailbox server to the site and move 
mailboxes. Remember you don't have a good backup so you can't do it 
that way.
Kevin 
-Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 March 2002 15:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
RE: datbase 
These errors are typically hardware problems, so 
unless you find the hardware problem 
Neil Hobson 
Silversands 

RE: Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



ok - Circular logging 
disabled and you were right Michael - there is a corruption in the 
priv.edb. UGH.

Offline backup tonight and 
every night until I can have the system on Saturday for 
Isenteg.

Thanks for all the help 
guys. I bet this will solve my problem.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Competence, like truth, beauty, and 
contact lenses, is in the eye of the beholder. -- Dr. Laurence J. Peter 


  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:51 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  if 
  you disable circular logging, you can recover from point of failure.. that is 
  why you should turn it off.
  

-Original Message-From: Matt Bullock 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 
2002 12:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Backup Exec Problem
Circular logging:
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314605

MS 
seems to think you can flip the switch on or off at leisure. I have 
always had it disabled so I couldnt tell you what would happen if I 
re-enabled it.

Matt Bullock

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
  11:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Backup Exec Problem
  we do backup from a 
  different server - two of them backing up all of my servers individually 
  onto Dell DLT drives.
  
  We have been toying 
  with disabling circular first so I guess with 25 gigs I should be able to 
  - but if this does not work I don't want to not have a way back and then 
  have this server get overwhelmed with uncommitted log 
  files.
  
  If I disable circular 
  logging can it be re-enabled without much issue?
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Ever notice how irons have a 
  setting for *permanent* press? I don't get it... -- Steven Wright 
  
  

-Original Message-From: Matt 
Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 
March 22, 2002 11:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
Then I guess the next thing I would try would be to disable 
circular logging. I have 2 servers running Backup Exec 8, one with 
a DDS3 and one with a DDS4, neither have circular logging enabled. 
The remote agent backup has me worried too. Are you backing up the 
exchange database from another server? That is something I havent 
tested before. I always do local backups when it comes to 
exchange. Never worked for a company with a large enough store to 
require anything else.

Matt Bullock
(Up the 101 in Westlake)

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 
  2002 10:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
  Did a test backup 
  that was on one one tape - it failed in the exact same 
  place.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
  Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
  91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I went to the hardware 
  store and bought some used paint. It was in the shape of a house. I 
  also bought some batteries, but they weren't included. So I had to buy 
  them again. -- Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: Matt 
Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Friday, March 22, 2002 10:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
Problem
Try backing up just the exchange stuff using 1 tape if 
possible instead of a full backup with multiple tapes. 


  -Original Message-From: 
  Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Friday, March 22, 2002 10:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Backup Exec Problem
  
  Hey 
  Folks - This list has been so helpful I am dipping into the well 
  once again

RE: Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



as soon as the boss comes 
in and authorizes the 250 I am going to call pss and see what could have caused 
this. The server is only three months old. Then see what they 
suggest. I will post what they recommend. I was looking on tech tips 
and there are a lot of us in this boat.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Executive ability is deciding quickly 
and getting somebody else to do the work. -- John G. Pollard 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:20 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  since we are in the same boat, what are you going to do to fix your 
  corruption?
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
Exec Problem
ok - Circular logging 
disabled and you were right Michael - there is a corruption in the 
priv.edb. UGH.

Offline backup tonight 
and every night until I can have the system on Saturday for 
Isenteg.

Thanks for all the help 
guys. I bet this will solve my problem.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Competence, like truth, beauty, 
and contact lenses, is in the eye of the beholder. -- Dr. Laurence J. Peter 


  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  10:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Backup Exec Problem
  if you disable circular logging, you can recover from point of 
  failure.. that is why you should turn it off.
  

-Original Message-From: Matt 
Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
March 26, 2002 12:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
Circular logging:
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314605

MS seems to think you can flip the switch on or off at 
leisure. I have always had it disabled so I couldnt tell you what 
would happen if I re-enabled it.

Matt Bullock

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 
  2002 11:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
  we do backup from 
  a different server - two of them backing up all of my servers 
  individually onto Dell DLT drives.
  
  We have been 
  toying with disabling circular first so I guess with 25 gigs I should 
  be able to - but if this does not work I don't want to not have a way 
  back and then have this server get overwhelmed with uncommitted log 
  files.
  
  If I disable 
  circular logging can it be re-enabled without much 
  issue?
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
  Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
  91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Ever notice how irons have 
  a setting for *permanent* press? I don't get it... -- Steven Wright 
  
  

-Original Message-From: Matt 
Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Friday, March 22, 2002 11:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
Problem
Then I guess the next thing I would try would be to disable 
circular logging. I have 2 servers running Backup Exec 8, one 
with a DDS3 and one with a DDS4, neither have circular logging 
enabled. The remote agent backup has me worried too. Are 
you backing up the exchange database from another server? That 
is something I havent tested before. I always do local backups 
when it comes to exchange. Never worked for a company with a 
large enough store to require anything else.

Matt Bullock
(Up the 101 in Westlake)

  -Original Message-From: 
  Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Friday, March 22, 2002 10:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



that kills single instance 
storage. how big is your database? mine is 14 gigs. I would 
hate to exmerge over 400 users.

I will call them after 
lunch.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I had to stop driving my car for a 
while...the tires got dizzy. -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:10 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  PSS 
  suggested I do a eseutil/p, but they decided to have my exmerge it out, create 
  a new blank db and exmerge it back in
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
Exec Problem
as soon as the boss 
comes in and authorizes the 250 I am going to call pss and see what could 
have caused this. The server is only three months old. Then see 
what they suggest. I will post what they recommend. I was 
looking on tech tips and there are a lot of us in this 
boat.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Executive ability is deciding 
quickly and getting somebody else to do the work. -- John G. Pollard 


  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  11:20 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Backup Exec Problem
  since we are in the same boat, what are you going to do to fix your 
  corruption?
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, 
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 
26, 2002 1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
ok - Circular 
logging disabled and you were right Michael - there is a corruption in 
the priv.edb. UGH.

Offline backup 
tonight and every night until I can have the system on Saturday for 
Isenteg.

Thanks for all the 
help guys. I bet this will solve my problem.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Competence, like truth, 
beauty, and contact lenses, is in the eye of the beholder. -- Dr. 
Laurence J. Peter 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  March 26, 2002 10:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
  if you disable circular logging, you can recover from point of 
  failure.. that is why you should turn it off.
  

-Original Message-From: Matt 
Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
Problem
Circular logging:
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314605

MS seems to think you can flip the switch on or off at 
leisure. I have always had it disabled so I couldnt tell you 
what would happen if I re-enabled it.

Matt Bullock

  -Original Message-From: 
  Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Friday, March 22, 2002 11:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  we do backup 
  from a different server - two of them backing up all of my servers 
  individually onto Dell DLT drives.
  
  We have been 
  toying with disabling circular first so I guess with 25 gigs I 
  should be able to - but if this does not work I don't want to not 
  have a way back and then have this server get overwhelmed with 
  uncommitted log files.
  
  If I disable 
  circular logging can it be re-enabled without much 
  issue?
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear

RE: Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



anyone use raid 10 on 
exchange?

I am wondering if this 
caused my database corruption.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Genius is ten percent inspiration and 
fifty percent capital gains. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:22 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  If 
  you have corruption in the store.. EXMERGE might fail on several mailboxes 
  depending on where the corruption is.
  I 
  have experienced this myself and the store would not move 3 mailboxes(out of 
  250)due to internal corruption. I had to save those out 
  individually(.PST) and then some folders wouldn't download due to same 
  corruption.
  
  The 
  good news was that I tried to run ESEUTIL on it afterwards and it came back 
  with a 50meg file once completed.. Basically a blank 
store.
  
  So 
  the destroy and re-create store option maybe your best 
  solution.
  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:10 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  PSS 
  suggested I do a eseutil/p, but they decided to have my exmerge it out, create 
  a new blank db and exmerge it back in
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
Exec Problem
as soon as the boss 
comes in and authorizes the 250 I am going to call pss and see what could 
have caused this. The server is only three months old. Then see 
what they suggest. I will post what they recommend. I was 
looking on tech tips and there are a lot of us in this 
boat.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Executive ability is deciding 
quickly and getting somebody else to do the work. -- John G. Pollard 


  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  11:20 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Backup Exec Problem
  since we are in the same boat, what are you going to do to fix your 
  corruption?
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, 
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 
26, 2002 1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
ok - Circular 
logging disabled and you were right Michael - there is a corruption in 
the priv.edb. UGH.

Offline backup 
tonight and every night until I can have the system on Saturday for 
Isenteg.

Thanks for all the 
help guys. I bet this will solve my problem.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Competence, like truth, 
beauty, and contact lenses, is in the eye of the beholder. -- Dr. 
Laurence J. Peter 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  March 26, 2002 10:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
  if you disable circular logging, you can recover from point of 
  failure.. that is why you should turn it off.
  

-Original Message-From: Matt 
Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
Problem
Circular logging:
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314605

MS seems to think you can flip the switch on or off at 
leisure. I have always had it disabled so I couldnt tell you 
what would happen if I re-enabled it.

Matt Bullock

  -Original Message-From: 
  Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Friday, March 22, 2002 11:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  we do backup 
  from a different server - two of them backing

RE: Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



they want me to exmerge as 
well - gonna take forever and I hate the idea of losing single instance 
storage.

I bet it was that d*** raid 
10. I TOLD them I didn't want to do that!



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I saw a close friend of mine the 
other day... He said, "Stephen, why haven't you called me?" I said, "I can't 
call everyone I want. My new phone has no five on it." He said, "How long have 
you had it?" I said, "I don't know... my calendar has no sevens on it." -- 
Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  the 
  NT 4.0 cluser we used to have caused our corruption last summer.. TWICE in one 
  month
  
    
    -----Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
6:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
Exec Problem
anyone use raid 10 on 
exchange?

I am wondering if this 
caused my database corruption.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Genius is ten percent inspiration 
and fifty percent capital gains. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - 
  HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:22 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
  Exec Problem
  If you have corruption in the store.. EXMERGE might fail on several 
  mailboxes depending on where the corruption is.
  I have experienced this myself and the store would not move 3 
  mailboxes(out of 250)due to internal corruption. I had to save those 
  out individually(.PST) and then some folders wouldn't download due to same 
  corruption.
  
  The good news was that I tried to run ESEUTIL on it afterwards and 
  it came back with a 50meg file once completed.. Basically a blank 
  store.
  
  So the destroy and re-create store option maybe your best 
  solution.
  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 
  1:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Backup Exec Problem
  PSS suggested I do a eseutil/p, but they decided to have my exmerge 
  it out, create a new blank db and exmerge it back in
  

    -Original Message-From: Zangara, 
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 
26, 2002 1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
as soon as the boss 
comes in and authorizes the 250 I am going to call pss and see what 
could have caused this. The server is only three months old. 
Then see what they suggest. I will post what they recommend. 
I was looking on tech tips and there are a lot of us in this 
boat.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Executive ability is deciding 
quickly and getting somebody else to do the work. -- John G. Pollard 


  
  -Original Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  March 26, 2002 11:20 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
  since we are in the same boat, what are you going to do to fix 
  your corruption?
  

-Original Message-From: 
Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec 
Problem
ok - Circular 
logging disabled and you were right Michael - there is a corruption 
in the priv.edb. UGH.

Offline backup 
tonight and every night until I can have the system on Saturday for 
Isenteg.

Thanks for all 
the help guys. I bet this will solve my 
problem.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 

RE: Spell Check

2002-03-25 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Spell Check





I use www.spellchecker.com great support and cake to install.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spell Check



http://www.messageware.com/products/pluspack/pluspack.html



-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Spell Check



Is anyone aware of a third party spell checker for OWA. If not how is Yahoo offering this to their web clients? Thanks


Brien Mayer 
Senior Network Administrator
Merchant's Tire
(703)393-4416
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-25 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



we do backup from a 
different server - two of them backing up all of my servers individually onto 
Dell DLT drives.

We have been toying with 
disabling circular first so I guess with 25 gigs I should be able to - but if 
this does not work I don't want to not have a way back and then have this server 
get overwhelmed with uncommitted log files.

If I disable circular 
logging can it be re-enabled without much issue?



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Ever notice how irons have a setting 
for *permanent* press? I don't get it... -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Matt Bullock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
  11:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
  Exec Problem
  Then 
  I guess the next thing I would try would be to disable circular logging. 
  I have 2 servers running Backup Exec 8, one with a DDS3 and one with a DDS4, 
  neither have circular logging enabled. The remote agent backup has me 
  worried too. Are you backing up the exchange database from another 
  server? That is something I havent tested before. I always do 
  local backups when it comes to exchange. Never worked for a company with 
  a large enough store to require anything else.
  
  Matt 
  Bullock
  (Up 
  the 101 in Westlake)
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
10:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Backup Exec Problem
Did a test backup that 
was on one one tape - it failed in the exact same place.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I went to the hardware store and 
bought some used paint. It was in the shape of a house. I also bought some 
batteries, but they weren't included. So I had to buy them again. -- Steven 
Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Matt Bullock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 
  2002 10:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Backup Exec Problem
  Try backing up just the exchange stuff using 1 tape if possible 
  instead of a full backup with multiple tapes. 
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 
2002 10:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Backup Exec Problem

Hey Folks - 
This list has been so helpful I am dipping into the well once 
again.

We are not 
getting a solid backup of our exchange server. We have contacted 
Veritas and done every step they suggested and we have had zero 
luck.

Environment:
Exchange 5.5 
sp4 running on Windows 2000K SP2 Circular logging enabled until I 
can get a solid backup.
Backup Exec 
8.5 running on NT 4. SP 6a
Remote 
agents and Exchange agents installed (and reinstalled ad 
naseum)

It seems to 
be failing on the logs. I have a 25 gigs of space on the log drive 
so I can disable circular but I am concerned of the ramifications of 
that as well without a solid backup. I have full access to the 
server as I CAN do a Brick Level Backup but for obvious reasons would 
prefer not to.


TIA for any 
direction!




Here is the 
output of the log file. The server name has been changed to 
protect the innocent.



OFO: Started for device: "\\exchange\C$"

Performing Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 10:00:01 
PM"Backup of "\\exchange\C$ "Backup set #2 on storage media #1Backup set 
description: "Exchange"Backup Type: NORMAL - Back Up Files - Reset 
Archive BitBackup started on 3/21/02 at 10:11:16 PM.

Backup completed on 3/21/02 at 
10:17:12 PM.Backed up 12718 files in 810 directories.Processed 
1,358,719,818 bytes in 5 minutes and 56 
seconds.Throughput rate: 218.4 
MB/min--OFO: 
Started for device: "\\exchange\D$"

Performing Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 
10:00:01 PM"Backup of "\\exchange\D$ 
"Backup set #3 on storage media #1Backup s

RE: Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-25 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Thank Bonnie - we are 
reconfiguring backup now to use the service account and will try it without 
ofo.

The account we were using 
does have top level access to exchange.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
The more pretentious a corporate 
name, the smaller the organization. (For instance, The Murphy Center for 
Codification of Human and Organizational Law, contrasted to IBM, GM, ATT 
...) 

  
  -Original Message-From: Miller Bonnie L. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
  11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
  Exec Problem
  
  Not 
  sure what Veritas has suggested already, but it sounds like it might be a 
  permissions issue. I wouldn't 
  want to leave it this way, but have you tried attaching to the server for 
  backups by using the exchange service account and then only backing up the 
  last two items (Directory and Information Store)? We back up our E2k servers with BE 8.5 
  from a different machine than the Exchange servers. We backed up our EX5.5 server the same 
  way for several years before that using Veritas software w/o resorting to 
  BLB. I would also question having 
  the option checked to use OFO-shouldn't need it for just the stores (again, 
  separate the job from your drive backups, where you can use OFO). One other thing-have you attempted to 
  run this at a different time? 
  Scheduled jobs or other Exchange tasks might be running in the 
  night.
  
  Just 
  ideas,
  Bonnie
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Zangara, 
  Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:18 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Backup Exec 
  Problem
  
  Hey 
  Folks - This list has been so helpful I am dipping into the well once 
  again.
  
  We are 
  not getting a solid backup of our exchange server. We have contacted 
  Veritas and done every step they suggested and we have had zero 
  luck.
  
  Environment:
  Exchange 5.5 sp4 
  running on Windows 2000K SP2 Circular logging enabled until I can get a 
  solid backup.
  Backup 
  Exec 8.5 running on NT 4. SP 6a
  Remote 
  agents and Exchange agents installed (and reinstalled ad 
  naseum)
  
  It 
  seems to be failing on the logs. I have a 25 gigs of space on the log 
  drive so I can disable circular but I am concerned of the ramifications of 
  that as well without a solid backup. I have full access to the server as 
  I CAN do a Brick Level Backup but for obvious reasons would prefer not 
  to.
  
  
  TIA for 
  any direction!
  
  
  
  List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Backup Exec Problem - update

2002-03-25 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Disabled circular 
logging. Updated BE with latest build - (don't know the number the backup 
guy did it) Using exchange service account as backup account for this 
job. Rebuilt backup job without open file option and not backing up 
anything on that server except system stat and IS and DS with flush committed 
logs. 

Did a restart of the 
services before backup ran. Zero errors.

Still dies at flushing 
logs. Now I am thinking of going to a new backup software - anyone use 
commvault?



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects 
Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
  11:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
  Exec Problem
  we do backup from a 
  different server - two of them backing up all of my servers individually onto 
  Dell DLT drives.
  
  We have been toying with 
  disabling circular first so I guess with 25 gigs I should be able to - but if 
  this does not work I don't want to not have a way back and then have this 
  server get overwhelmed with uncommitted log files.
  
  If I disable circular 
  logging can it be re-enabled without much issue?
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Ever notice how irons have a 
  setting for *permanent* press? I don't get it... -- Steven Wright 

  

-Original Message-From: Matt Bullock 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
11:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Backup Exec Problem
Then I guess the next thing I would try would be to disable circular 
logging. I have 2 servers running Backup Exec 8, one with a DDS3 and 
one with a DDS4, neither have circular logging enabled. The remote 
agent backup has me worried too. Are you backing up the exchange 
database from another server? That is something I havent tested 
before. I always do local backups when it comes to exchange. 
Never worked for a company with a large enough store to require anything 
else.

Matt Bullock
(Up the 101 in Westlake)

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
  10:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Backup Exec Problem
  Did a test backup 
  that was on one one tape - it failed in the exact same 
  place.
  
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I went to the hardware store 
  and bought some used paint. It was in the shape of a house. I also bought 
  some batteries, but they weren't included. So I had to buy them again. -- 
  Steven Wright 
  

-Original Message-From: Matt 
Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 
March 22, 2002 10:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Problem
Try backing up just the exchange stuff using 1 tape if possible 
instead of a full backup with multiple tapes. 

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 
  2002 10:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Backup Exec Problem
  
  Hey Folks 
  - This list has been so helpful I am dipping into the well once 
  again.
  
  We are not 
  getting a solid backup of our exchange server. We have contacted 
  Veritas and done every step they suggested and we have had zero 
  luck.
  
  Environment:
  Exchange 
  5.5 sp4 running on Windows 2000K SP2 Circular logging enabled 
  until I can get a solid backup.
  Backup 
  Exec 8.5 running on NT 4. SP 6a
  Remote 
  agents and Exchange agents installed (and reinstalled ad 
  naseum)
  
  It seems 
  to be failing on the logs. I have a 25 gigs of space on the log 
  drive so I can disable circular but I am concerned of the 
  ramifications of that as well without a solid backup. I have 
  full access to the server as I CAN do a Brick Level Backup but for 
  obvious reasons would prefer not to.
  
  
  TIA for any 
  direction!
  
  
  
  
  Here

Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-22 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message




Hey Folks - This 
list has been so helpful I am dipping into the well once 
again.

We are not getting a 
solid backup of our exchange server. We have contacted Veritas and done 
every step they suggested and we have had zero luck.

Environment:
Exchange 5.5 sp4 
running on Windows 2000K SP2 Circular logging enabled until I can get a 
solid backup.
Backup Exec 8.5 
running on NT 4. SP 6a
Remote agents and 
Exchange agents installed (and reinstalled ad naseum)

It seems to be 
failing on the logs. I have a 25 gigs of space on the log drive so I can 
disable circular but I am concerned of the ramifications of that as well without 
a solid backup. I have full access to the server as I CAN do a Brick Level 
Backup but for obvious reasons would prefer not to.


TIA for any direction!




Here is the output 
of the log file. The server name has been changed to protect the 
innocent.



OFO: Started for device: "\\exchange\C$"

Performing Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 10:00:01 
PM"Backup of "\\exchange\C$ "Backup set #2 on storage media #1Backup set 
description: "Exchange"Backup Type: NORMAL - Back Up Files - Reset Archive 
BitBackup started on 3/21/02 at 10:11:16 PM.

Backup completed on 3/21/02 at 10:17:12 
PM.Backed up 12718 files in 810 directories.Processed 1,358,719,818 
bytes in 5 minutes and 56 seconds.Throughput rate: 218.4 
MB/min--OFO: 
Started for device: "\\exchange\D$"

Performing Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 10:00:01 
PM"Backup of "\\exchange\D$ 
"Backup set #3 on storage media #1Backup set description: 
"Exchange"Backup Type: NORMAL - Back Up Files - Reset Archive BitBackup 
started on 3/21/02 at 10:17:46 PM.

Backup completed on 3/21/02 at 10:18:51 
PM.Backed up 368 files in 23 directories.Processed 306,994,352 bytes 
in 1 minute and 5 seconds.Throughput rate: 270.3 
MB/min--OFO: 
Started for device: "\\exchange\E$"

Performing Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 10:00:01 
PM"Backup of "\\exchange\E$ 
"Backup set #4 on storage media #1Backup set description: 
"Exchange"Backup Type: NORMAL - Back Up Files - Reset Archive BitBackup 
started on 3/21/02 at 10:19:25 PM.

Backup completed on 3/22/02 at 1:02:39 
AM.Backed up 15 files in 10 directories.Processed 35,041,397,882 bytes 
in 2 hours, 43 minutes, and 14 seconds.Throughput rate: 
204.7 
MB/min--Performing 
Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 10:00:01 
PM"Backup of "\\exchange\Microsoft 
Exchange Directory "Backup set #5 on storage media #1Backup set 
description: "Exchange"Backup Type: FULL - Database  Logs (flush 
committed logs)Backup started on 3/22/02 at 1:02:55 AM.

Backup completed on 3/22/02 at 1:03:30 
AM.Backed up 1 Exchange Server store(s)Processed 171,983,118 bytes 
in 35 seconds.Throughput rate: 281.2 
MB/min--Performing 
Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 10:00:01 
PM"Backup of "\\exchange\Microsoft 
Exchange Information Store "Backup set #6 on storage media #1Backup set 
description: "Exchange"Backup Type: FULL - Database  Logs (flush 
committed logs)Backup started on 3/22/02 at 1:03:30 AM.

Drive and media information from media 
mount:Changer Name: DELL 1Drive Name: DELL 1Media Slot: 5Media 
Cartridge Label: DLT032102S5Targeted Media Set Name: Media4-5Backup set 
#6 on storage media #2The Exchange Store service is not responding. Backup 
set aborted.^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Backup completed on 3/22/02 at 2:16:04 
AM.Backed up 0 Exchange Server store(s)Processed 14,865,715,288 bytes 
in 1 hour, 9 minutes, and 48 seconds.Throughput rate: 
203.1 MB/min




Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I was sad because I had no shoes, 
until I met a man who had no feet. So I said, "Got any shoes you're not using?" 
-- Steven Wright 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Backup Exec Problem

2002-03-22 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Did a test backup that was 
on one one tape - it failed in the exact same place.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I went to the hardware store and 
bought some used paint. It was in the shape of a house. I also bought some 
batteries, but they weren't included. So I had to buy them again. -- Steven 
Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Matt Bullock 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
  10:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup 
  Exec Problem
  Try 
  backing up just the exchange stuff using 1 tape if possible instead of a full 
  backup with multiple tapes. 
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 
10:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Backup 
Exec Problem

Hey Folks - This 
list has been so helpful I am dipping into the well once 
again.

We are not 
getting a solid backup of our exchange server. We have contacted 
Veritas and done every step they suggested and we have had zero 
luck.

Environment:
Exchange 5.5 sp4 
running on Windows 2000K SP2 Circular logging enabled until I can get 
a solid backup.
Backup Exec 8.5 
running on NT 4. SP 6a
Remote agents 
and Exchange agents installed (and reinstalled ad 
naseum)

It seems to be 
failing on the logs. I have a 25 gigs of space on the log drive so I 
can disable circular but I am concerned of the ramifications of that as well 
without a solid backup. I have full access to the server as I CAN do a 
Brick Level Backup but for obvious reasons would prefer not 
to.


TIA for any direction!




Here is the 
output of the log file. The server name has been changed to protect 
the innocent.



OFO: Started for device: "\\exchange\C$"

Performing Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 10:00:01 
PM"Backup of "\\exchange\C$ "Backup set #2 on storage media #1Backup set 
description: "Exchange"Backup Type: NORMAL - Back Up Files - Reset 
Archive BitBackup started on 3/21/02 at 10:11:16 PM.

Backup completed on 3/21/02 at 10:17:12 
PM.Backed up 12718 files in 810 directories.Processed 1,358,719,818 
bytes in 5 minutes and 56 seconds.Throughput rate: 218.4 
MB/min--OFO: 
Started for device: "\\exchange\D$"

Performing Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 
10:00:01 PM"Backup of "\\exchange\D$ 
"Backup set #3 on storage media #1Backup set description: 
"Exchange"Backup Type: NORMAL - Back Up Files - Reset Archive 
BitBackup started on 3/21/02 at 10:17:46 PM.

Backup completed on 3/21/02 at 10:18:51 
PM.Backed up 368 files in 23 directories.Processed 306,994,352 bytes 
in 1 minute and 5 seconds.Throughput rate: 270.3 
MB/min--OFO: 
Started for device: "\\exchange\E$"

Performing Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 
10:00:01 PM"Backup of "\\exchange\E$ 
"Backup set #4 on storage media #1Backup set description: 
"Exchange"Backup Type: NORMAL - Back Up Files - Reset Archive 
BitBackup started on 3/21/02 at 10:19:25 PM.

Backup completed on 3/22/02 at 1:02:39 
AM.Backed up 15 files in 10 directories.Processed 35,041,397,882 
bytes in 2 hours, 43 minutes, and 14 
seconds.Throughput rate: 204.7 
MB/min--Performing 
Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 
10:00:01 PM"Backup of "\\exchange\Microsoft Exchange Directory "Backup set #5 on storage media 
#1Backup set description: "Exchange"Backup Type: FULL - Database 
 Logs (flush committed logs)Backup started on 3/22/02 at 1:02:55 
AM.

Backup completed on 3/22/02 at 1:03:30 
AM.Backed up 1 Exchange Server store(s)Processed 171,983,118 bytes 
in 35 seconds.Throughput rate: 281.2 
MB/min--Performing 
Remote Agent backup

Media Name: "Media created 3/21/02 
10:00:01 PM"Backup of "\\exchange\Microsoft Exchange Information Store "Backup set #6 on storage media 
#1Backup set description: "Exchange"Backup Type: FULL - Database 
 Logs (flush committed logs)Backup started on 3/22/02 at 1:03:30 

RE: D****** F######: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loo p.

2002-03-20 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Thanks 
Stu!



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
We're living in a golden age. All you 
need is gold. -- D.W. Robertson. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 
  5:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: D** 
  F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum hop count 
  exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
  I 
  took that address out Jim.
  
  Stu
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 
11:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: FW: 
D** F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum 
hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
Anyone else getting one of these bounces for every message 
sent to the list? 
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT 
Manager Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear 
Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message- From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM 
To: Zangara, Jim Subject: DELIVERY 
FAILURE: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count 
exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
Your message 
 Subject: RE: performance issues 
was not delivered to: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
because: 
 Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; 
Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop. 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Having trouble getting in to the Administrator account

2002-03-20 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Having trouble getting in to the Administrator account





Change the account assigned to the mailbox to your personal one and see if you can open it that way. 


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Steve Jacobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Having trouble getting in to the Administrator account



Help.


I recently re-installed Exchange 5.5 after reconfiguring the entire network. I can access all my other mailboxes just fine, but when I try to access the Administrator account, it comes back and asks me for my userid and password, which I give as Administrator and the administrator password. It won't take it, and keeps re-asking. I can cancel out, but I really want to the bounced e-mail.

Any thoughts on what is going on?


Steve Jacobson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: performance issues

2002-03-19 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: performance issues





I would suggest you max out the ram on the machine.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: performance issues



Hello folks, 


Have a hardware issue that has required me to consolidate users from 2 servers on to 1 server. Users are complaining about Outlook just hanging. This is an Exchange 5.5 sp4 site running on NT 4.0 sp6 servers. The hardware itself is a Compaq DL 380 Dual Pentium III - 733 with 500 mb of ram. There is plenty of disk space on the all 3 partitions.

The server went from having about a 190 users on it to having 370 users. I thought that there would be more then enough CPU and Memory on this box to accommodate the additional users so that I could trouble shoot the other box but it doesn't appear so.

Does this box sound like it should be able to accommodate this many users? Does it need more memory?


Performance monitor shows much higher CPU usage for the STORE which is to be expected with increase in users but its not pegged all the time. 

Opinions?



Bob F. 


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





FW: D****** F######: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.

2002-03-19 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: FW: D** F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded.  Message probably in a routing loop.





Anyone else getting one of these bounces for every message sent to the list?


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Zangara, Jim
Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.


Your message


 Subject: RE: performance issues


was not delivered to:


 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


because:


 Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Anyone replicating Exchange across a WAN link?

2002-03-18 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Anyone replicating Exchange across a WAN link?





We are exploring using double take to do this.


A single server here running double take and another in nyc with a dedicated T1 between the two.


Going to cost a boatload but the boss said zero downtime.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone replicating Exchange across a WAN link?



It sounds scary.


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone replicating Exchange across a WAN link?



Don't do it.. Unless you have a business need that is very justifiable, and you want to toss some $'s at it.


--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE



-Original Message-
From: Sasha Kipervarg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone replicating Exchange across a WAN link?



Hello,


Has anyone successfully clustered an Exchange database across a WAN link? Anotherwords, all the benefits of clustering Exchange, but a situation where the other Exchange server is sitting at a datacenter, ready to take over it's partner (across a WAN link) role.

I have read about NSI's GeoCluster and that sounds like it would work, but hoped someone had practical experience with the package (or others if they exist).

tia, Sasha


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: HELP! My IMS is down and I am out of ideas.

2002-03-15 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: HELP! My IMS is down and I am out of ideas.





I am pretty sure that outlook replaces the exchange mapi with a version of it's own. You might try to reservice pack and see if that brings the correct version back into play.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: HELP! My IMS is down and I am out of ideas.



Hi Everyone,
 I restarted my Exchange Server running 5.5 after I had uninstalled MS Outlook on it to move Outlook to another partition, and now my IMS is not coming back up. I am getting an error Event ID 4116, and 4018. 4018

states: Unable to start the Internet Mail Service because MAPI could not be initialized. I have looked through the Knowledge base, and have checked all of the areas that they suggest, but I am still not able to start the service. I am here all night until I can get this up so I would appreciate any help.

Thank you in advance,


Nick Symiakakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Connected site uses Internet Mali AND x400

2002-03-14 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Verified

Sites on 5.5 are sp4 sites 
on 2K are sp2. I am 5.5 they are 2K.

No differences in x400 and 
SMTP except obvious organizational ones.

strange fact - one of the 
users on the foreign system has an email address from my domain and he receives 
mail fine through the x400 if I use my native domain. However if I just 
pick him from the GAL exchange uses his native SMTP address and the message sits 
in my IMS Q but stillgets delivered to himvia x400. Same for 
DL's as well.

How strange is 
this?

Any 
ideas?



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I was sad because I had no shoes, 
until I met a man who had no feet. So I said, "Got any shoes you're not using?" 
-- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 
  4:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Connected site uses Internet Mali AND x400
  actually don't know that 
  - don't have any control over the other sites. I can find out what SP 
  they re running.
  
  I am 5.5 
  sp4
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of 
  Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman 
  Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  

-Original Message-From: David N Precht 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 
3:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Connected site uses Internet Mali AND x400
All servers at the same SP for 2k and 5.5 ?

  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 
  2002 17:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Connected site uses Internet Mali AND x400
  Hey Folks 
  -
  
  Strange question and 
  my upstream guys are clueless.
  
  We are part of a 
  *huge* organization with a mix of Exchange 5.5 and 2000 sites. Mail 
  flows from my site to all of the other connected sites using X400 without 
  an issues except for this new site they just migrated in. 
  
  
  These guys are using 
  Exch 2000 and used to be stand alone until we absorbed them. I am 
  assuming they used the Server Migration Wizard to bring it in but I was 
  not involved in it. My site is Exch 5.5 sp4.
  
  My problem is 
  whenever my users send email to anyone in this one particular site it 
  tries to use the Internet Mail service while it still delivers the email 
  using the X400. The end result is they get the email but I have to 
  go in and bounce messages from the IMS that say "Host 
  Unreachable".
  
  Thisis the case 
  for mail messages and messages to their main distribution list which is 
  listed in my main distribution list.
  
  Not a major thing but 
  I am sick of users calling asked why they get the bounce even though the 
  mail was delivered.
  
  Any ideas would be 
  appreciated.
  
  TIA
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
  Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  I went to a general store. They 
  wouldn't let me buy anything specifically. -- Steven Wright 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Connected site uses Internet Mali AND x400

2002-03-13 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Hey Folks 
-

Strange question and my 
upstream guys are clueless.

We are part of a *huge* 
organization with a mix of Exchange 5.5 and 2000 sites. Mail flows from my 
site to all of the other connected sites using X400 without an issues except for 
this new site they just migrated in. 

These guys are using Exch 
2000 and used to be stand alone until we absorbed them. I am assuming they 
used the Server Migration Wizard to bring it in but I was not involved in 
it. My site is Exch 5.5 sp4.

My problem is whenever my 
users send email to anyone in this one particular site it tries to use the 
Internet Mail service while it still delivers the email using the X400. 
The end result is they get the email but I have to go in and bounce messages 
from the IMS that say "Host Unreachable".

Thisis the case for 
mail messages and messages to their main distribution list which is listed in my 
main distribution list.

Not a major thing but I am 
sick of users calling asked why they get the bounce even though the mail was 
delivered.

Any ideas would be 
appreciated.

TIA


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I went to a general store. They 
wouldn't let me buy anything specifically. -- Steven Wright 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Connected site uses Internet Mali AND x400

2002-03-13 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



actually don't know that - 
don't have any control over the other sites. I can find out what SP they 
re running.

I am 5.5 
sp4


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of 
Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, 
CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  
  -Original Message-From: David N Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:35 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Connected 
  site uses Internet Mali AND x400
  All 
  servers at the same SP for 2k and 5.5 ?
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 
2002 17:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Connected site uses Internet Mali AND x400
Hey Folks 
-

Strange question and my 
upstream guys are clueless.

We are part of a *huge* 
organization with a mix of Exchange 5.5 and 2000 sites. Mail flows 
from my site to all of the other connected sites using X400 without an 
issues except for this new site they just migrated in. 


These guys are using 
Exch 2000 and used to be stand alone until we absorbed them. I am 
assuming they used the Server Migration Wizard to bring it in but I was not 
involved in it. My site is Exch 5.5 sp4.

My problem is whenever 
my users send email to anyone in this one particular site it tries to use 
the Internet Mail service while it still delivers the email using the 
X400. The end result is they get the email but I have to go in and 
bounce messages from the IMS that say "Host 
Unreachable".

Thisis the case 
for mail messages and messages to their main distribution list which is 
listed in my main distribution list.

Not a major thing but I 
am sick of users calling asked why they get the bounce even though the mail 
was delivered.

Any ideas would be 
appreciated.

TIA


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I went to a general store. They 
wouldn't let me buy anything specifically. -- Steven Wright 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Mobile Information Server

2002-03-10 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Anyone using 
this?

I have a guy who wants 
outlook on his cell phone and this looks slick.

Any 
worries?

TIA

Jim
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: SSL on OWA

2002-03-07 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: SSL on OWA





Someone mentioned thwate - they were just purchased by version but are still cheap - 225 for two years.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA



Funny guy...


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA



Gee William... Why would you recommend Verisign... :)


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 14:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA



I recommend Verisign.


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 6:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA



Why not just gen up your own self-signed cert?


John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! 



-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA



Our current cert is nearing expiration. Verisign has also opted to up the cost to almost 900 bucks. With aspirations of putting a cert on the workstyle server as well as some secure web sites we are looking to an alternative to verisign. With CA built into windows it seems like a good alternative.

Jonathan


-Original Message-
From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA



Not sure you need to set up a CA at all. Just use the cert and you will be fine.


David


-


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server

2002-03-06 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server





This is also possible with Double Take. It maintains two copies of the server and automatically takes over if the primary fails.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server



I needed that after a day like today. Almost decided to hang it up and become a park ranger.




-Original Message-
From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server



thanks





-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server



Hug?


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server



I have 4 of them. :o(



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server



http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/55/help/default.asp?url=/exchange/en/55
/help/default.htm



We looked at it once and decided against it. More trouble than its worth.


-Original Message-
From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server



Does MS have Whitepapers on this?


Jeán Paul Reece



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server



Yes. That is clustering.


-Original Message-
From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Fail-Over Server



I know that there are clustering products out there, but can you setup 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to point to a single Store in the event one fails the other picks up where the other left off?

Jeán Paul Reece




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove messa ges

2002-02-27 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Folks -

One of my outer offices is 
running Exch 5.5 sp 4 STANDARD. I have requested the tech there to upgrade 
to Enterprise but that is another story. 

He is out today and I 
started getting calls from his users not being able to connect. I checked 
and sure enough he passed the 16 gig limit.

I have never had to deal 
with this. How can I reduce the size of the IS without it being 
started?

I have been searching 
technet but have not found anything yet.

Any links greatly 
appreciated!

Thanks.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I want to get a tatoo of myself on my 
entire body, only 2" taller. -- Steven Wright 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove m essa ges

2002-02-27 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Thanks guys - was in total 
panic this morning.

Went ahead and called PSS 
since I had never done the eseutil and they had an even more elegant solution. 


I ftp'ed the i386 directory 
from an Enterprise version of exchange to that machine and ran the setup. 


Boom - 15 minutes later 
store back up and limit removed.

Why this guy never did this 
in the first place is beyond me.

Thanks for all the 
help!



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
While I was gone, somebody rearranged 
on the furniture in my bedroom. They put it in EXACTLY the same place it was. 
When I told my roommate, he said: "Do I know you?" -- Steven Wright 


  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 
  11:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 gig 
  limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove m essa 
  ges
  Defragging it means running eseutil. From a cmd 
  prompt the proper syntax would be: eseutil /d priv.edb /is 
  This must be run from the drive that the priv.edb is located and this drive 
  should have a minimum of 16 GB free space or the defrag will not complete, you 
  should really have about 110% of the size of the database in free space 
  available for the defrag to run. The exchange services must be stopped 
  in order for the defrag to run, and you can expect it to take a while to 
  run. 
  
  Once 
  you get this completed and this server back online, you need to think about 
  setting mailbox limits, running mailbox manager on a regular basis, until this 
  office can upgrade to Enterprise.
  
  Good 
  Luck,
  
  Sherry
  

-Original Message-From: Dan Bartley 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
27, 2002 1:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove messa 
ges

Defrag 
it.


Best 
Regards,Dan 
BartleySenior MIS ManagerNetCarrier 
Inc.
-Original 
Message-From: Zangara, 
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
February 27, 2002 13:32To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: 16 gig 
limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove messa 
ges


Folks -



One of my outer offices is 
running Exch 5.5 sp 4 STANDARD. I have requested the tech there to 
upgrade to Enterprise but that is another story. 



He is out today and I started 
getting calls from his users not being able to connect. I checked and 
sure enough he passed the 16 gig limit.



I have never had to deal with 
this. How can I reduce the size of the IS without it being 
started?



I have been searching technet 
but have not found anything yet.



Any links greatly 
appreciated!



Thanks.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT 
ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


I 
want to get a tatoo of myself on my entire body, only 2" taller. -- Steven 
Wright 


List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove m essa ges

2002-02-27 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove m  essa ges





They didn't say a word but we do have a blanket MS license so I don't have to worry.


Had to pay the PSS bill tho.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove m essa ges




Glad you got it...nice solution from PSS...just curious, did they ask for a licence before suggesting that : )


Patrick





 

 Zangara, Jim 

 jzangara@premier To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 

 eradio.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 cc: 

 02/27/2002 03:11 Subject: RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove 

 PM m essa ges 

 Please respond to 

 MS-Exchange 

 Admin Issues 

 

 



Thanks guys - was in total panic this morning.


Went ahead and called PSS since I had never done the eseutil and they had an even more elegant solution.


I ftp'ed the i386 directory from an Enterprise version of exchange to that machine and ran the setup.


Boom - 15 minutes later store back up and limit removed.


Why this guy never did this in the first place is beyond me.


Thanks for all the help!





Jim Zangara, MCSE+I
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer
Premiere Radio Networks
A Division of Clear Channel Communications
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Direct: (818) 461-8620
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



While I was gone, somebody rearranged on the furniture in my bedroom. They put it in EXACTLY the same place it was. When I told my roommate, he said: Do I know you? -- Steven Wright

 -Original Message-
 From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:37 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can
 remove m essa ges


 Defragging it means running eseutil. From a cmd prompt the proper
 syntax would be: eseutil /d priv.edb /is This must be run from the
 drive that the priv.edb is located and this drive should have a
 minimum of 16 GB free space or the defrag will not complete, you
 should really have about 110% of the size of the database in free
 space available for the defrag to run. The exchange services must be
 stopped in order for the defrag to run, and you can expect it to take
 a while to run.


 Once you get this completed and this server back online, you need to
 think about setting mailbox limits, running mailbox manager on a
 regular basis, until this office can upgrade to Enterprise.


 Good Luck,


 Sherry
 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:02 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I
 can remove messa ges


 Defrag it.




 Best Regards,
 Dan Bartley
 Senior MIS Manager
 NetCarrier Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 13:32
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I
 can remove messa ges


 Folks -


 One of my outer offices is running Exch 5.5 sp 4
 STANDARD. I have requested the tech there to upgrade to
 Enterprise but that is another story.


 He is out today and I started getting calls from his
 users not being able to connect. I checked and sure
 enough he passed the 16 gig limit.


 I have never had to deal with this. How can I reduce the
 size of the IS without it being started?


 I have been searching technet but have not found anything
 yet.


 Any links greatly appreciated!


 Thanks.




 Jim Zangara, MCSE+I
 IT Manager
 Special Projects Engineer
 Premiere Radio Networks
 A Division of Clear Channel Communications
 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500
 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
 Direct: (818) 461-8620
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I want to get a tatoo of myself on my entire body, only
 2 taller. -- Steven Wright


 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Blackberry Enterprise server for Exchange

2002-02-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Been using it here without 
issue. Greatsystem but I agree about their 
support.

Getting ready to 
decommission my first server and their support said nothing was needed for 
blackberry - then I dig some more and find an article warning about 
it.

Oh 
well.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
I was in the grocery store. I saw a 
sign that said "pet supplies". So I did. Then I went outside and saw a sign that 
said "compact cars". -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros 
  - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 
  26, 2002 12:28 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Blackberry Enterprise server for Exchange
  Does anybody have 
  the Blackberry enterprise server for Exchange working without any major 
  issues? BB support is just not helping so I was wondering if 
  anybody
  here uses this 
  tool. I'm running Exchange 55 a windows 2000 server. Any input 
  would be veryhelpful.
  
  NelsonList Charter and 
  FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  This electronic message and any attachments 
  contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The 
  information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and 
  access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, 
  any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this 
  information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
  electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that 
  you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank 
  you.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Apple connection to Exchange

2002-02-21 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



yes - the RCP fix along 
with the hosts file totally solved our problem.

My support call with MS was 
free because it was a known bug.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Time is the most valuable thing a man 
can spend. -- Theophrastus 

  
  -Original Message-From: Eric Brouwer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 
  2002 10:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Apple connection to Exchange
  Jim, 
  are you still out there? Did this resolve your 
issue?
  
  I am 
  having an eerily similar experience
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, December 15, 
2001 12:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Apple connection to Exchange
Possible fix found -

According to PSS and some tests we ran, my Exchange server is not 
listening on canc_ip_tcp which is required for MAC connectivity. He 
has provided my a hot fix to solve it Q297534 unfortunately he provided me a 
bum link to download the fix. So till Monday we wait. No big 
deal, luckily the MAC users are off this weekend. 

If 
anyone wants more details let me know.

  -Original Message-From: Kevin Loney 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 
  2001 1:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Apple connection to Exchange
  My experience was the same as Jons. I have one Mac G4 that gets 
  configured via DHCP, all I added was the Exchange Server name, the mailbox 
  name and the user info. I have had fewer problems with the Mac than my 
  Wintel machines.
  
  Kevin Loney
  
-Original Message-From: Bonner, Jon 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
1:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Apple connection to Exchange
I regularly 
connect to the campus Exchange server from home using my personal iMac. 
It is running OS X and Outlook 2001 (running in Classic mode). When I 
set this up for the very first time, I just installed Outlook 2001 and 
told it my mailbox name. It simply worked like it was supposed to work. 
I've also used Outlook 2001 on the iMac here in the office that is 
running Mac OS 9. It too connected just like you'd expect it to - on the 
first try.
Jon Bonner 

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 
  2001 1:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Re: Apple connection to Exchange
  That was cold... yet on target... But 
  words hurt sometimes ;)
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Doug Eubank 
To: MS-Exchange 
Admin Issues 
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
12:24 
Subject: RE: Apple connection 
to Exchange

MAC = Overpriced Etch-A-Sketch.

  -Original Message-From: 
  Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Friday, December 14, 2001 12:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Apple connection to 
  Exchange
  Keith -
  
  Thanks - sorry if I sounded frustrated - two very vocal 
  users and I guess ignorance breeds contempt as far as MACs go for 
  me. 
  
  Using Outlook 2001 - when I resolve the name I start with 
  IP and Alias and resolve to Computer Name and User 
  name.
  
  Static IP address even on the same subnet plugged into the 
  same switch as the exchange server.
  
  Not sure about the domain in the Additional Search Domains 
  will check that first thing in the morning. Already have the 
  ticket open with PSS - boss didn't care - we will just get in the 
  queue in the morning if this doesn't resolve 
  it.
  
  Thanks for the advice!
  
  
  
  
  
-Original Message-From: 
Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Apple connection to 
Exchange
Jim,
Did you get your problem 
resolved?
If not are you using Outlook 2001 or 
Outlook 8.x

Server Side rules quit working for SOME users

2002-02-21 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Hey Folks 
-

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Win 2K 
SP2

Yesterday several people 
started complaining that server side rules no longer work for 
them.

Rebuilt the the rule - no 
good.

No changes have been made 
to the system and rules work fine for others (me for 
instance).

Searched TechNet but did 
not find anything that seemed relevant.

Any one else seen 
this?

TIA for any 
ideas.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
There's no such thing as a free 
lunch. -- Milton Friendman 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Server Side rules quit working for SOME users

2002-02-21 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



No changes to the network 
at all in this time frame. Strange - these guys are all physically located 
within about 30 feet of each other. Not reporting any other connectivity 
issues.



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Waste not, get your budget cut next 
year. 

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  February 21, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Server Side rules quit working for SOME 
  users
  Rules use RDP. Any changes to connectivity 
  between those users and Exchange?
  
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 
2002 12:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Server Side rules quit working for SOME users
Hey Folks 
-

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Win 
2K SP2

Yesterday several 
people started complaining that server side rules no longer work for 
them.

Rebuilt the the rule - 
no good.

No changes have been 
made to the system and rules work fine for others (me for 
instance).

Searched TechNet but 
did not find anything that seemed relevant.

Any one else seen 
this?

TIA for any 
ideas.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
(818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
There's no such thing as a free 
lunch. -- Milton Friendman 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Moving an Exchange server

2002-02-08 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Moving an Exchange server





http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:42 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Moving an Exchange server
 
 
 I have a complicated situation. We had a server with 
 exchange on it die, so we brought exchange on another one. 
 Since it was working we left it that way (with exchange on 
 both) and looked at buying a new server to out exchange on. 
 We have done so and now will move all of exchange onto our 
 new server. Here is what I am going to do:
 
 1. Move mailboxes to new server.
 2. Re home public folders
 3. Test by bringing down both of the existing servers.
 4. Uninstall exchange on first one and then the other 
 server. That will leave only the one (new and running W2K 
 with Ex5.5; old ones were running NT w/ 5.5). What else do I 
 need to do?
 
 -Roger Hanna
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Doing test restore with transaction logs...

2002-02-07 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Doing test restore with transaction logs...





Two words - DOUBLE TAKE!


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



 -Original Message-
 From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:48 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Doing test restore with transaction logs...
 
 
 A MS PSS dude told me once while helping me, I just finished 
 helping a guy restore an exchange server by replaying years 
 of transaction logs on an empty DB. I would think it could 
 be done then...
 
 How is your backup server integrated into your AD site?
 Need some info!
 
 jlc
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:10 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Doing test restore with transaction logs...
 
 Hello again,
 
 Going to try to explain my question again, seeing that I 
 haven't gotten any feedback yet. We are looking at setting 
 up a hot site with servers, leased line, etc where a full 
 backup location could be utilized in case of complete 
 building loss. We are looking for a relatively reliable 
 method to get our mail backups off-site nightly and we are 
 discussing the possibilities of just send our transaction 
 logs nightly to this remote site, along with 1 or 2 tapes 
 with a full backup. If I needed to, could I restore the full 
 backup, copy the logs for that week, restart the IS and once 
 the logs are replayed, be back in business? Would this work? 
 Any comments, articles, kb's or alternative options are 
 highly appreciated.
 
 Thanks again,
 
 Mike Z
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Zatkalik 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:15 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Doing test restore with transaction logs...
 
 
 Hello all,
 
 Trying to do some testing in regards to DR on Exchange 5.5 
 sp3 on NT4. We are looking into doing backups over the wire, 
 and wondering if I send the transaction logs offsite, at the 
 same location that has our full backup tape, can I do a 
 restore using these logs? After reading through the 5.5 DR 
 guide from MS, it sounds like you can replay the logs, 
 actually sounds like you have to play them back, but what is 
 the syntax of this command? All of the kb articles I see are 
 dealing with recovering after transaction log drive is lost. 
 Sorry for the newbie question, but realized that I don't know 
 exactly how to do this. I have, numerous times before, 
 completed a full restore to a separate server and recovered 
 multiple mailboxes without any problems, but haven't tried to 
 restore using the logs, for an up to the minute restore. 
 Thanks in advance for information, or even kbs that could 
 help in this matter.
 
 tia,
 
  Mike Zatkalik
  
  
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ 
 at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Force logout of users

2002-02-01 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



what was the 
hack?


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of 
Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, 
CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  
  -Original Message-From: Jamie Domingue 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 
  2:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Force 
  logout of users
  
  Never mind I found a 
  reg hack that will take care of 
  this.
  
  Thanks 
  
  
  Jamie 
  Domingue
  Systems Integrator 
  II
  Global Data 
  Systems
  337-291-6535
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Jamie 
  Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 
  2002 4:33 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Force logout of 
  users
  
  Using Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows 
  2000 server.
  
  Question: Is there a way to ensure that all 
  users remain logged out of Outlook/Exchange for a period of time so that I can 
  move mailboxes to a different server?
  
  The users have been informed but I 
  would like to ensure that no one tries to access their mailboxes during the 
  move.
  
  Thanks in 
  advance.
  
  Jamie 
  Domingue
  Systems Integrator 
  II
  Global Data 
  Systems
  337-291-6535
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Replication

2002-01-28 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Replication





No.


All OWA needs is IIS properly configured and OWA itself. It does not need a full install of exchange to function - just connectivity to exchange - it uses NetBIOS names so make sure your WINS is good or put a hosts file. If your current server is running out of room I bet a dozen Krispy Kremes that it is the IIS log files getting unruly.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



 -Original Message-
 From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:06 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Replication
 
 
 So I don't need the message transfer agent running on the OWA server?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:22 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Replication
 
 Owa doesn't replicate...the owa itself only passes through 
 web requests to the exchange server.
 
 
 
 thanks,
 
 Fred Valdez
 Network Administrator
 -Original Message-
 From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:59 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Replication
 
 
 Oppps, I guess I should have mentioned that OWA is on it's 
 own server and that I'm pretty sure it's replicating.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:43 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Replication
 
 OWA just connects to your server - it does not hold any 
 information from there.
 
 I bet your problem is the IIS log files.
 
 
 Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
 IT Manager
 Special Projects Engineer 
 Premiere Radio Networks 
 A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 -Original 
 Message-
 From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:20 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: OWA: Replication
 Hello Everyone,
 
 Hopefully your Monday is going better than mine.
 
 I have an issue with my OWA server. It would appear that I 
 have run out of disk space and thus causes the server crash. 
 Big surprise huh? Anyway, my question is this, does the OWA 
 server have to have room for replication between itself and 
 the main Exchange server? Do I have to have the same amount 
 of disk space on both servers? Or can I find a way just to 
 pull the info from the main server without any replication?
 
 TIA
 
 Garland Mac Neill
 Sys Admin
 Solbourne
 ] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ 
 at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 List Charter and 
 FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Replication

2002-01-28 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



They just opened near here 
- it is taking over as the IT department's preferred form 
ofbribery :)


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of 
Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, 
CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
  NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:38 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Replication
  Wow, 
  you MUST be sure if you bet an entire dozen.
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 
4:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Replication
No. 
All OWA needs is IIS properly configured and OWA 
itself. It does not need a full install of exchange to function - just 
connectivity to exchange - it uses NetBIOS names so make sure your WINS is 
good or put a hosts file. If your current server is running out of 
room I bet a dozen Krispy Kremes that it is the IIS log files getting 
unruly.
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT 
Manager Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear 
Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 -Original Message-  
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:06 PM 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: Replication  
  So I don't need 
the message transfer agent running on the OWA server?   -Original Message- 
 From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]  Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:22 AM  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  
Subject: RE: Replication   Owa doesn't replicate...the owa itself only passes through 
 web requests to the exchange server. 
  
  
thanks,   Fred 
Valdez  Network Administrator  -Original Message-  From: 
Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:59 AM 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: Replication  
  Oppps, I guess I 
should have mentioned that OWA is on it's  own 
server and that I'm pretty sure it's replicating.   -Original 
Message-  From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:43 AM 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: Replication  
 OWA just connects to your server - it does not 
hold any  information from there. 
  I bet your problem 
is the IIS log files.Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
 IT Manager  Special 
Projects Engineer  Premiere Radio Networks 
 A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403  Direct: 
(818) 461-8620  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 -Original  
Message-  From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:20 AM 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: OWA: Replication  Hello 
Everyone,   
Hopefully your Monday is going better than mine.   I have an issue with my OWA 
server. It would appear that I  have run out of 
disk space and thus causes the server crash.  
Big surprise huh? Anyway, my question is this, does the OWA  server have to have room for replication between itself and 
 the main Exchange server? Do I have to have the 
same amount  of disk space on both 
servers? Or can I find a way just to  pull 
the info from the main server without any replication?   TIA   Garland Mac Neill 
 Sys Admin  
Solbourne  ] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt- 
software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
 List Charter and FAQ  at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 List Charter and FAQ at:  
http://www.sunbelt- 
software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
   List Charter and  FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- 
software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange re-org

2002-01-23 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Exchange re-org





http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm


Ed Crowley server Move method. Works.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



 -Original Message-
 From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:25 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange re-org
 
 
 #1 resource - The link to the complete Exchange FAQ is here 
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 
 -Original 
 Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:00 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Exchange re-org
 
 
 I am in need of references that explain adding a new Ex 
 server and moving the users, connectors etc from the 
 bridgehead server to it, then retiring the bridgehead server. 
 We are running 5.5SP4 on NT4 SP5 in an NT4 Domain. New Server 
 will be EX 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP2 in the same NT4 domain. I have 
 been to Slipstick and thence MS TechNet already, I just 
 wanted to know of any other resources I should be looking at.
 
 Thanks!
 
 ***
 Michael K. Brownell
 Senior Network Administrator
 Express Messenger Systems/California Overnight
 
 Support Desk: 888.594.6306
 Office : 602.333.4401
 Cell : 602.315.5668
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ 
 at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Outlook XP Question/Oddity

2002-01-16 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



I have seen 
where it will not mark an emailed replied to after replying - I have had to go 
into my sent items to make sure I didn't imagine sending the reply. 


Exact same 
setup.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd 
Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

I put up my thumb... and 
it blotted out the planet Earth. --Neil Armstrong 

  
  -Original Message-From: Moody, 
  Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 1:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook XP Question/Oddity
  If 
  you have an e-mail that has happened to that would be OK to send to an 
  anonymous person, then forward it to me. Better yet, do a resend if 
  possible. I'll reply and see if it happens here.
  
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 3:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Outlook XP Question/Oddity
No, I can't replicate it, it really seems to be a random 
occurrence.

  
  -Original Message-From: Moody, 
  Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook XP 
  Question/Oddity
  I am running the identical setup and have not had that 
  problem. Do you have any steps to try to replicate 
  it?
  

-Original Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Outlook XP 
Question/Oddity
I have a 
question about Outlook XP. Sometimes when I reply to a message in 
Outlook XP, it will bold the original message in my inbox like it has 
not been read, but it does not do this all the time, others on my team 
running Outlook XP have experienced the same thing. Has anyone 
seen this/know what causes it?

Server: Exchange 5.5 sp4, NT 4.0 sp6
Workstations: Windows 2K sp2, Office/Outlook 
XP

It's not 
causing any problems, just an oddity that I can't seem to find a rhyme 
or reason to, but when Office/Outlook XP gets rolled out to my user base 
I know it will become an issue. I have done a TechNet search, but 
apparently it's either not been reported to MS, or I'm not using the 
right search phrase.

Thanks for 
any input,

Sherry 
Abercrombie
Data Center Administration 
Team
Information 
Technology
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Block out sending mail to a specific user

2002-01-04 Thread Zangara, Jim



you 
could block sending to his domain by putting a false entry in your LMHOSTS file 
(might be the hosts file need to double check) on your exchange server. 
That would mis-direct all email sent to that domain to whatever bogus IP address 
you gave it.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere 
Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Lester 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:54 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Block out sending 
  mail to a specific user
  I want my users to not send a mails to an outside 
  user. How should I go about it on the server end ?
  
  Thankx
  
  LesterList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Calendar

2002-01-02 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Calendar





http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechnol/exchange/maintain/featusability/cfbook.asp

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




 -Original Message-
 From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:38 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Calendar
 
 
 I have NO idea if what I'm trying to accomplish will work or 
 not, so I've come to the experts. What we want to do is 
 share a calendar that will be used by the entire department 
 for scheduling appointments in the Conference Room. This 
 way, users can use the Calendar to see when the Conference 
 Room is available. A mailbox has been created called 
 Conference Room. Usually, when you schedule an appointment, 
 the Calendar is not marked until that appointment is 
 accepted. However, we don't want to have to have someone 
 manually go in and accept every one of these messages in the 
 Conference Room mailbox. Is this making any sense, and if 
 so, is there anyway to setup an account to automatically 
 accept a meeting when it is requested?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Robert
 
 
 *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
 
 This electronic mail message and any attachments to this 
 electronic mail message contain confidential information 
 belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client 
 privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended 
 only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the 
 recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended 
 recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
 copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in 
 reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed 
 information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
 this electronic mail message in error, please forward the 
 electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then 
 remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system.
 
 *** The Dayton Power  Light Company. ***
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2

2001-12-14 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2





What utility?


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:42 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2
 
 
 There is a nice little 3rd party instant messaging app for it 
 that integrates with AOL, MSN, and Yahoo IM clients. Really 
 slick and pretty fast as well.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:41 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2
 
 
 I miss my blackberry:(
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:36 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2
 
 
 It does not need a reboot. I have done two BES' (NT 4.0 SP6a 
 servers) without a reboot.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:37 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2
 
 
 If it asks, you're ok -- just wait till the end of the day. 
 It's if it DOESN'T ask you, but goes ahead and reboots 
 anyway... THEN you're in trouble.
 
 -- Drew
 
 Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
 Dictators ride to and fro upon tigers which they dare not 
 dismount. And the tigers are getting hungry. - Winston Churchill
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Mezzone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:21 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2
 
 
 Yes from SP1. It doesn't mention anything in the readme but 
 with my luck it will ask me to reboot. It seems like all I 
 have to do is fart in the server room and NT asks me if I 
 want to reboot.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:19 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2
 
 
 I am not sure ... just from SP1 ?
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Robert Mezzone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 15:13
 Subject: Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2
 
 
  Does upgrading to Blackberry Enterprise Server SP2 require 
 a reboot of
  the NT server or restarting of any Exchange Services, other than the
 Blackberry
  Service. It doesn't mention rebooting in the documentation.
 
  Thanks.
 
  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 _
 
 Do You Yahoo!?
 
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Apple connection to Exchange

2001-12-14 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Possible fix found -

According to PSS and some tests we ran, my Exchange server is not 
listening on canc_ip_tcp which is required for MAC connectivity. He has 
provided my a hot fix to solve it Q297534 unfortunately he provided me a bum 
link to download the fix. So till Monday we wait. No big deal, 
luckily the MAC users are off this weekend. 

If 
anyone wants more details let me know.

  -Original Message-From: Kevin Loney 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
  1:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Apple 
  connection to Exchange
  My 
  experience was the same as Jons. I have one Mac G4 that gets configured via 
  DHCP, all I added was the Exchange Server name, the mailbox name and the user 
  info. I have had fewer problems with the Mac than my Wintel 
  machines.
  
  Kevin Loney
  
-Original Message-From: Bonner, Jon 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:15 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Apple 
connection to Exchange
I regularly 
connect to the campus Exchange server from home using my personal iMac. It 
is running OS X and Outlook 2001 (running in Classic mode). When I set this 
up for the very first time, I just installed Outlook 2001 and told it my 
mailbox name. It simply worked like it was supposed to work. I've also used 
Outlook 2001 on the iMac here in the office that is running Mac OS 9. It too 
connected just like you'd expect it to - on the first 
try.
Jon Bonner 

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
  1:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
  Apple connection to Exchange
  That was cold... yet on target... But words 
  hurt sometimes ;)
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Doug 
Eubank 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 
12:24 
Subject: RE: Apple connection to 
Exchange

MAC = Overpriced Etch-A-Sketch.

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 
  14, 2001 12:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Apple connection to 
  Exchange
  Keith -
  
  Thanks - sorry if I sounded frustrated - two very vocal users 
  and I guess ignorance breeds contempt as far as MACs go for me. 
  
  
  Using Outlook 2001 - when I resolve the name I start with IP 
  and Alias and resolve to Computer Name and User 
  name.
  
  Static IP address even on the same subnet plugged into the same 
  switch as the exchange server.
  
  Not sure about the domain in the Additional Search Domains will 
  check that first thing in the morning. Already have the ticket 
  open with PSS - boss didn't care - we will just get in the queue in 
  the morning if this doesn't resolve it.
  
  Thanks for the advice!
  
  
  
  
  
-Original Message-From: Keith Nelson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 
13, 2001 10:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Apple connection to 
Exchange
Jim,
Did you get your problem resolved?
If not are you using Outlook 2001 or Outlook 
8.x.
If your using the old version try Outlook 2001 from http://www.microsoft.com/mac/
Also are you resolving the names using DNS. If so how are the 
macs getting their IP address, DHCP or static?
On the Mac in the TCP/IP control panel do you have your 
domain name in the Additional Search domains. If not it might help 
having it there.

I hope this info helps. I started off as a mac person and 
still consider them real computers. However I don't think they are 
real network clients just like win9x isn't a real network 
client.

Keith 
NelsonNetwork AdministratorOrange County High School of the 
Arts[EMAIL PROTECTED](714) 560-0900 ex5910 


  -Original Message-From: 
  Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Apple connection to 
  Exchange
  
  Didn't want to stay on hold but they have an entire 
  MAC/Exchange group! I was way surprised.
  
  
  
-Original Message-From

Apple connection to Exchange

2001-12-13 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Hello 
-

Does anyone 
know of any whitepapers or troubleshooting guides to help me resolve 
connectivity issues with MAC's to my exchange 
server?

We are 
running Exchange 5.5 sp5 on NT4 SP6a. The MACS are running OS9.1 and 
Outlook for Mac and have a host file that points to the correct server. 
They are able to ping the server I can resolve their name and the server name 
using IP/Alias, but they cannot open their information store. They get 
Exchange Server offline error. I can open their store from any real 
computer (notice I am NOT a MAC fan) using their credentials and can use OWA 
from the MACs.

Any 
ideas?



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Apple connection to Exchange

2001-12-13 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message




Didn't 
want to stay on hold but they have an entire MAC/Exchange group! I was way 
surprised.



  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 
  6:40 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Apple 
  connection to Exchange
  they 
  might say DUDE, you are SO not supported for 245$
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 
2001 21:34To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Apple connection to Exchange
thanks - 
no dashes and using Outlook not the MAC client and the names do resolve - 
just can't open.

I am 
calling PSS - see if they have any ideas.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio 
Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  
  -Original Message-From: David N. 
  Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 
  13, 2001 6:31 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Apple connection to Exchange
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q183772
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q149596
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, 
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
December 13, 2001 21:14To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Apple connection to 
Exchange
Hello -

Does 
anyone know of any whitepapers or troubleshooting guides to help me 
resolve connectivity issues with MAC's to my exchange 
server?

We 
are running Exchange 5.5 sp5 on NT4 SP6a. The MACS are running 
OS9.1 and Outlook for Mac and have a host file that points to the 
correct server. They are able to ping the server I can resolve 
their name and the server name using IP/Alias, but they cannot open 
their information store. They get Exchange Server offline 
error. I can open their store from any real computer (notice I am 
NOT a MAC fan) using their credentials and can use OWA from the 
MACs.

Any 
ideas?


List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange2000 opinions

2001-12-12 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Spellchecker.com puts out a great OWA spell checking 
client. costs a grand but works great and the support is 
excellent.

http://www.spellchecker.com/corporate/


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd 
Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  
  -Original Message-From: Purviance, Chad 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 
  2001 7:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange2000 opinions
  
  OWA Spelling 
  check
  
  It is the number one 
  request I get from clients and the only solution out there is good but they 
  appear to want the customers themselves. The statement "All your Exchange2000 
  customers are belong to us" really bothered me.
  
  BTW only slightly 
  joking, The Messageware folks have a great product but the support angle is 
  that of a direct consulting company. As a consultant I will not allow a 
  product vender who directly competes, direct access to my clients. 
  
  
  Just funny that 
  way. 
  ;-)
  
  CJP
  
  BTW: If others have 
  had better interaction with Messageware, let me know AND the contact person. I 
  really need the solution for a coupld clients ... 
  just very concerned with the attitude I was giving. 
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 
  2001 10:36 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Exchange2000 
  opinions
  
  
  If you 
  were in a position of influence, what really bad things about Exchange2000 
  would you change and/or improve? What really irks you? What is the 
  product missing?
  
  
  
  OWA?
  
  Migration 
  issues?
  
  AD?
  
  Admin?
  
  Need for 
  third party apps?
  
  
  
  I don't 
  have any influence, but a summary will be delievered to those who 
  do.
  
  
  
  Email me 
  offline if you'd prefer.
  
  
  
  William 
  Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  +++The information transmitted is intended only for 
  the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
  and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
  use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons 
  or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received 
  this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this 
  document.+++
  The information transmitted is intended only for 
  the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
  and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
  use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons 
  or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received 
  this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this 
  document.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange2000 opinions

2001-12-12 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



my 
pleasure :)

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 
  3:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange2000 opinions
  Cool 
  tool ! Thanks for the link !
  

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 
2001 17:05To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange2000 opinions
Spellchecker.com puts out a great OWA spell checking 
client. costs a grand but works great and the support is 
excellent.

http://www.spellchecker.com/corporate/


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio 
Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  
  -Original Message-From: Purviance, 
  Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  December 10, 2001 7:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange2000 opinions
  
  OWA Spelling 
  check
  
  It is the number 
  one request I get from clients and the only solution out there is good but 
  they appear to want the customers themselves. The statement "All your 
  Exchange2000 customers are belong to us" really bothered 
  me.
  
  BTW only slightly 
  joking, The Messageware folks have a great product but the support angle 
  is that of a direct consulting company. As a consultant I will not allow a 
  product vender who directly competes, direct access to my clients. 
  
  
  Just 
  funny that way. 
  ;-)
  
  CJP
  
  BTW: If others 
  have had better interaction with Messageware, let me know AND the contact 
  person. I really need the solution for a coupld 
  clients ... just very concerned with the attitude I was giving. 
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 
  2001 10:36 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Exchange2000 
  opinions
  
  
  If 
  you were in a position of influence, what really bad things about 
  Exchange2000 would you change and/or improve? What really irks 
  you? What is the product missing?
  
  
  
  OWA?
  
  Migration 
  issues?
  
  AD?
  
  Admin?
  
  Need 
  for third party apps?
  
  
  
  I 
  don't have any influence, but a summary will be delievered to those who 
  do.
  
  
  
  Email me offline 
  if you'd prefer.
  
  
  
  William 
  Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  +++The information transmitted is intended only 
  for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
  confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
  dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, 
  this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
  is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender 
  and destroy any copies of this document.+++
  The information transmitted is intended only 
  for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
  confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
  dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, 
  this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
  is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender 
  and destroy any copies of this document.List Charter 
and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Hacking tool to .pst files

2001-12-12 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Hacking tool to .pst files





Try this one - says it was contributed by one of this list's exchange gurus - William.


http://www.securiteam.com/tools/6G00B1F0AS.html


-Original Message-
From: Brad Metzler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hacking tool to .pst files



Trust me, I'll make it as painful as possible, however it would be nice to
actually be the hero at the end. However given that your link doesn't work,
I don't want to get ahead of myself :) 


(that link is redirected to their home page now and I'm not finding such a
utility readily apparent from that page, but thanks for trying). 


Brad


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hacking tool to .pst files



http://www.msexchange.org/files/pst19upg.zip 
To use this, you must agree to hold the PST in mention at least 3 days. The
user must be warned in advance that this is a very risky operation and there
is no guarantee it may work. You must make them sweat. Then when you give it
back, you will be a hero.


-Original Message-
From: Brad Metzler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Hacking tool to .pst files



One of our ever wise staff members managed to lock herself out of her
personal folders by setting a password on it which she can not recall. This
file of course contains 'mission critical' information for her (blah blah
blah). Anyone have a name or URL for a good pst password hacking tool?
Thanks


Brad


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: can I delete msgs by subject?

2001-12-11 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: can I delete msgs by subject?





The new version of antigen (6.5) supposedly gives you that ability but I have not had a chance to install and test it yet.

-Original Message-
From: Bonner, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: can I delete msgs by subject?



Is it possible to delete messages out of all the thousands of mailboxes in
the store based on subject? I know that you could do this with the
ExMerge.exe utility, however it processes mailboxes too slowly to be
practical, so I was wondering if there was a faster, quicker method.


Thanks in advance...


Jon Bonner




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: can I delete msgs by subject?

2001-12-11 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: can I delete msgs by subject?



yeslooks like your right - I was planning on downloading it the day 
I ran my tests - didn't read it wasn't out yet.

Rats - 
that was my project for the holidays.

  -Original Message-From: Bonner, Jon 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:57 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: can I delete 
  msgs by subject?
  We actually use 
  Antigen, but I didn't think 6.5 was available yet, not even as a beta 
  version.
  
  Jon 
  Bonner 
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 
2001 10:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
can I delete msgs by subject?
The new version of antigen (6.5) supposedly gives you that 
ability but I have not had a chance to install and test it yet.
-Original Message- From: 
Bonner, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: can I 
delete msgs by subject? 
Is it possible to delete messages out of all the thousands 
of mailboxes in the store based on subject? I know 
that you could do this with the ExMerge.exe utility, 
however it processes mailboxes too slowly to be practical, so I was wondering if there was a faster, quicker 
method. 
Thanks in advance... 
Jon BonnerList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: OWA Issue I know you can solve - so do it

2001-12-10 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



this may be 
really stupid but have you tried to re-synch your domain 
controllers?


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd 
Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  
  -Original Message-From: Ellery July 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:40 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA Issue I 
  know you can solve - so do it
  
  This persons mailbox 
  is 120 meg - so that is may last resort ( 125 is my current limit). Yes she 
  does have offline folders.
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Kevin 
  Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:37 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: OWA Issue 
  I know you can solve - so do it
  
  
  delete 
  the account and recreate it... universal computer fix 
  it.
  
  
  
  
  --
  Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE 
  CKST
  
-Original 
Message-From: Ellery 
July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:26 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
Issue I know you can solve - so do it
They 
get to the logon password/username screen and all it does it keeps asking 
them. We even used the domain/username thing. No 
avail.

BTW, 
ask a stupid question maybe something simple was 
overlooked.

-Original 
Message-From: Kevin 
Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:27 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
Issue I know you can solve - so do it


I was 
going to ask some stupid Questions then I saw who this was. So here comes my 
best.



They 
do have login local rights? we are talking 5.5 here? what does it tell you 
when they try to login?


--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE 
CKST
-Original 
  Message-From: Ellery 
  July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:00 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: OWA Issue 
  I know you can solve - so do it
  I have two people who are not 
  able to access OWA - everyone else can. The two people do have Domain 
  Users rights. Interestingly they had lock out problem referenced in 
  Q278299 but with that (maybe) fixed they can not access 
  OWA
  
  ellery 
  july
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: OWA session timeouts changed after applying MS01-057

2001-12-09 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: OWA session timeouts changed after applying  MS01-057





Hey Dan -


I applied that patch the day it came out to my OWA server, Nt 4.0 sp6a Exch 5.5 sp 4 IE 6. Have not had the session timeout problem you mentioned. Just tested with 5 minutes of inactivity. 



-Original Message-
From: Dan Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 5:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA session timeouts changed after applying MS01-057



PS... does anyone know how to fix this issue :)


-Original Message-
From: Dan Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 10 December 2001 11:02
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA session timeouts changed after applying MS01-057



Hi Folks


Has anyone else noticed that after applying MS01-057 (Q313576) that users sessions are timing out after 1 minute or so ?

Cheers


Dan Yarrow
NT/2000 Systems Administrator
Central Queensland University
Information Technology Division


Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +61 7 4923 2151
Fax +61 7 4930 9254




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: [virus] For those of you who dont see the big picture

2001-12-04 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



I am so 
grateful my systems are configured to block .scr, exe's and a ton of other 
extensions. If the file is legit we tell the sender to change the 
extension and we will rename it.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd 
Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  
  -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 
  4:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [virus] 
  For those of you who dont see the big picture
  It 
  is on there machines. no need to reopen it.. :  But yes you can 
  still kill it with ISscann. I am doing that right now on a 
  server.
  
  
  --
  Kevinm M WLKMMAS, 
  UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
  

-Original Message-From: *ExchangeAdmin 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 
2001 4:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
[virus] For those of you who dont see the big picture
Excellent point, but regardless you can still use ISSCAN to remove 
attachments from your IS right? That way after your done rebuilding 
all of your machines, someone can't re-open it ;-)

  -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 
  2001 4:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  [virus] For those of you who dont see the big picture
  Cleaned or not, it is still on the machines that 
  sent it. Read what it does? cleaning the server is only the 
  beginning..
  
  http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_GONE.AVSect=T
  
  
  --
  Kevinm M WLKMMAS, 
  UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
  

-Original Message-From: 
*ExchangeAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - 
W32.goner.a@mm
Not sure about E2k, but if you are using 5.5 check out 
Q224493 
Danny Cahoon Network 
Engineer Saflink Corp 
-Original Message- From: 
Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:43 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 

Hi there,  
Is there any tool with which I can clean all the 
mailboxes on my exchange from this dirty "Hi" message?  Thanks mal   -Original Message- 
From: Bob Fronk (BTR Technologies, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:13 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 
 Configure NAV for 
Exchange to block attachments. This stopped "goner" in its 
tracks. I block: *.com, *.exe, *.scr and also the "double 
extensions" like *.jpg.vbs. and assorted others. 
http://service4.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/docid/271215411348 
 Bob  -Original Message- 
From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:03 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 
 We just got this 
one. Norton's on Exchange and the desktops did NOT catch 
it and our virus definitions are current, so be 
careful. We are downloading Antigen as I 
type.  Karen 
Palmer SCJD   List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Delay messages

2001-12-03 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Delay messages





The delay option is in corp. mode as well. But it does not do what the original poster asked which is delaying messages over one mb - it simply delays the selected message. Kind of a pain that I doubt users would actually do. It does take a third party to effectively do this.

Jim Zangara - IT Manager



 -Original Message-
 From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 8:37 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Delay messages
 
 
 I am running IMO (Internet Mail Only) Outlook XP on Win2k 
 In a particular Unsent message, clcik on Options -  Do Not Deliver
 before ~
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 23:26
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Delay messages
 
 
 Would you care to elaborate on this? I've run both O2K and O2K2, I've
 yet find this option. In fact, it's not possible without a 
 third party
 software package.
 
 D
 
 Profanity is the one language all programmers know best.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:25 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Delay messages
 
 
 With Outlook 2000 and XP, you can
 
 -Original Message-
 From: LE PERDRIEL Jean-François [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:38
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Delay messages
 
 
 How could i delay sending messages which are (for example) 
 over 1 Mb. I
 would like to send them after 8 P.M.
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 _
 
 Do You Yahoo!?
 
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 _
 
 Do You Yahoo!?
 
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: mail forward

2001-11-29 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: mail forward





Use the server redirector. Works like a champ and doesn't require CR's.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




 -Original Message-
 From: Luis Esteves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:54 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: mail forward
 
 
 Hi everybody. I'm in the final stages of seting up an 
 Exchange2000 server and I'm kinda' stumped with something I 
 hope is pretty basic.
 
 We have 4 employees here that have e-mail pagers. I want all 
 incoming e-mail to be delivered to their exchange mailbox and 
 be automatically forwarded to their Blackberry account. I 
 suspect that this is handled in the 'recipient policies' but
 
 TIA,
 -
 Luis Esteves
 Digital Connexxions Corp.
 Network Administrator
 Tel: (905) 338-8355
 Cell: (905) 334-7448
 http://www.dconx.com
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Anyone have any issues with secureiis and owa...

2001-11-13 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message




Works 
seamlessly here - not using SSL tho - had to modify one of the default settings 
but would not run without it.



  
  -Original Message-From: Michael Plotsker 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 
  7:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Anyone have 
  any issues with secureiis and owa...
  with and with out ssl
  Michael D. 
  PlotskerTechnology ConsultantKJ Technology Consulting, Inc.T. 
  718-575-1595C. 917-406-4215F. 212-202-5013mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange SMTP Routing

2001-11-09 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing





We use NAV for gateways as a mail relay that sends to exchange running antigen and then to the desktops with nav CE


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Why don't they just make mouse flavored cat food? -- Steven Wright 



 -Original Message-
 From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:08 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
 
 
 I agree - without exception.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:44 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
 
 
 NT Servers can be just as secure as Unix servers, if you 
 apply the proper patches. You do apply the proper patches, don't you?
 
 -- Drew
 
 Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
 TEN THINGS YOU CAN DO TO PREVENT WAR 
 http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11597
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:37 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
 
 
 Are you sure you want to put NT machines on the firewall? 
 Shouldn't there be UNIX machines there for better security?
 
 --
 Matt Lathrum
 General Dynamics Decision Systems
 When cryptography is outlawed,
 bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
 
 -Original Message-
 From:  Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:53 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Exchange SMTP Routing
 
 Currently we run;
 
 Exchange 5.5 SP4
 WinNT4.0 Sp 6A
 
 We also currently have our mail routed to us and 
 scanned\filtered by an outside company which costs $$. We 
 are looking at building a server that just does SMTP 
 relay\filtering\scanning and put it in our DMZ. We are also 
 looking at putting Trend virus scanning on the box so that 
 our mail is scanned by two different AntiVirus companies 
 before delivered to the users desktops. Our logic behind 
 this is sometimes Trend comes out with a pattern a little 
 quicker than Symantec, so we do both. We also do attachment 
 filtering with Norton For Exchange.
 
 I guess I have a couple of questions about this;
 
 1. What is everyone else using for SMTP relay. What 
 software, location of server, etc.
 
 2. What is the best SMTP relay software\hardware? Should I 
 just use another install of Exchange on a regular server`?
 
 Any suggestions or relevant web sites will be greatly appreciated.
 
 Regards,
 Shawn
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ 
 at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ 
 at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange SMTP Routing

2001-11-09 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing





Exactly. Plus it gives me the ability to send mail to different servers via domain name without having to worry about MX records or DNS. Everything points to the gateway.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Why don't they just make mouse flavored cat food? -- Steven Wright 



 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:21 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
 
 
 Nope. Smart. I always put an AV gateway in front of any mail 
 server. Plus the gateway can queue mail if the server goes 
 down or during service work.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andrew Duey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:21 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
 
 
 Paranoid?
 
 --Andrew Duey, MCSE
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:15 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
 
 We use NAV for gateways as a mail relay that sends to 
 exchange running antigen and then to the desktops with nav CE 
 Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
 IT Manager 
 Special Projects Engineer 
 Premiere Radio Networks 
 A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 Why don't they just make mouse flavored cat food? -- Steven Wright 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Leblanc, Shawn [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:08 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing 
  
  
  I agree - without exception.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Drewski [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:44 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing 
  
  
  NT Servers can be just as secure as Unix servers, if you apply the 
  proper patches. You do apply the proper patches, don't you?
 
  
  -- Drew
  
  Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! 
  TEN THINGS YOU CAN DO TO PREVENT WAR 
  http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11597 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:37 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing 
  
  
  Are you sure you want to put NT machines on the firewall? Shouldn't 
  there be UNIX machines there for better security?
  
  --
  Matt Lathrum
  General Dynamics Decision Systems 
  When cryptography is outlawed, 
  bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. 
  
  -Original Message- 
  From: Leblanc, Shawn [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:53 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: Exchange SMTP Routing 
  
  Currently we run;
  
  Exchange 5.5 SP4
  WinNT4.0 Sp 6A
  
  We also currently have our mail routed to us and 
 scanned\filtered by 
  an outside company which costs $$. We are looking at building a 
  server that just does SMTP relay\filtering\scanning and put 
 it in our 
  DMZ. We are also looking at putting Trend virus scanning 
 on the box 
  so that our mail is scanned by two different AntiVirus companies
  before delivered to the users desktops. Our logic behind 
  this is sometimes Trend comes out with a pattern a little 
  quicker than Symantec, so we do both. We also do attachment 
  filtering with Norton For Exchange. 
  
  I guess I have a couple of questions about this;
  
  1. What is everyone else using for SMTP relay. What software, 
  location of server, etc.
  
  2. What is the best SMTP relay software\hardware? Should I 
 just use 
  another install of Exchange on a regular server`?
  
  Any suggestions or relevant web sites will be greatly appreciated.
  
  Regards,
  Shawn
  
  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  
  
  List Charter and FAQ
  at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  
  
  
  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  
  
  List Charter and FAQ
  at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ 
 at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-09-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Ed  Crowley Server Move Method






Hey Folks


The errors on my current exchange server and the fact that the previous guy set it up as a bdc and other things running on it has prompted me to move it to a new better stronger faster box only running exchange. I am going to utilize the Ed Crowley method but I had a question I was hoping someone could answer.

Is it possible to move users to the new server and place them in recipient containers?


TIA 


Jim


There was a power outage at a department store yesterday. Twenty people were trapped on the escalators. -- Steven Wright 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-09-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



definitely a 
few I would like to put in there!


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

I play the harmonica. The 
only way I can play is if I get my car going really fast, and stick it out the 
window. -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
  NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:42 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ed Crowley Server Move 
  Method
  Sure, unless of course you don't like them. In which case, the 
  recycle bin g.
  
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Ed 
Crowley Server Move Method
Hey Folks 
The errors on my current exchange server and the fact that 
the previous guy set it up as a bdc and other things running on it has 
prompted me to move it to a new better stronger faster box only running 
exchange. I am going to utilize the Ed Crowley method but I had a 
question I was hoping someone could answer.
Is it possible to move users to the new server and place 
them in recipient containers? 
TIA 
Jim 
There was a power outage at a department store yesterday. 
Twenty people were trapped on the escalators. -- Steven Wright 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Step Two Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-09-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Step Two Ed Crowley Server Move Method





Exchange 5.5 sp5 on win 4.0 sp 6a (Both machines)



In step two of my migrations I am hitting something I don't understand. Please forgive my ignorance if this is a simple thing. The text reads:

2. In the old server's Information Store properties, change the location of the mailboxes' Public Folder server to be the new server. This will take care of any newly created public folders. (You'll have to stop and restart the Exchange services before this will take effect.)

I see on the bottom of the properties page the home server is set to the old server. How do I change that? In the Instances tab there is a EventConfig_NewServer setting that is already on the left. 

I have searched the Q and found several articles relating re-homing public folders but I am not positive that is what I need to do and want this box to be pristine from day one. FYI I don't have any public folders as yet on the old or new server.

Any advice will be appreciated


TIA


Jim







List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





Blackberry CDO.dll hotfix

2001-09-17 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Blackberry CDO.dll hotfix





Getting ready to install the blackberry enterprise server on one of my machines and in reading the docs I had a quick question. They mention that we need to update the CDO.dll according to Q289606. I have downloaded the file but I want to be sure if it goes on the exchange server or the blackberry server?

If on exchange has anyone had a problem with it? I hate installing into exchange. Gives me a cold sweat just to think about it.

Thanks


Jim


I bought some powdered water, but I don't know what to add to it. -- Steven Wright 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Blackberry CDO.dll hotfix

2001-09-17 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



thanks - 
doing separate just wanted to make sure where the fix goes - appreciate the feed 
back. Will install on Blackberry box


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Disc space -- the final 
frontier! 

  
  -Original Message-From: Mitrik, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:05 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Blackberry 
  CDO.dll hotfix
  Jim,
  You 
  are not going to install it into the Exchange.Blackberry server should 
  be different box with Exchange Administrator software. This is not Exchange 
  server.
  This 
  fix should be appliedto Blackberry box, notto Exchange 
  server.
  Blackberrybox will use just one mailbox for 
  sending messages to wireless network.
  PeterM
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 17, 
2001 2:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Blackberry CDO.dll hotfix
Getting ready to install the blackberry enterprise server on 
one of my machines and in reading the docs I had a quick question. 
They mention that we need to update the CDO.dll according to Q289606. 
I have downloaded the file but I want to be sure if it goes on the exchange 
server or the blackberry server?
If on exchange has anyone had a problem with it? I 
hate installing into exchange. Gives me a cold sweat just to think 
about it.
Thanks 
Jim 
I bought some powdered water, but I don't know what to add 
to it. -- Steven Wright List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: OWA / Web Access

2001-09-11 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: OWA / Web Access





I would double check with your firewall provider.


From outside I can get DNS resolution to your domain but not a ping reply.


I suspect you need a conduit opened in your firewall to allow incoming port 80 (assuming that is where you put OWA) connections.

Just a thought.


-Original Message-
From: Jeff A. Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA / Web Access



I can't get OWA/WEB site access externally, internally I can tho.
WatchGuard tech support has assured me everything is going thru the
firewall properlly (they dialed into my firewall directly). I have a
laptop that I am using to dial-out and use to connect externally (i.e.
it is not connected directly to my network).


Jeff


-Original Message-
From: Briggs, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 13:12
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA / Web Access



Jeff:


Can you get the initial web page from your OWA server - the login page?
If
not, seems like a firewall issue.
Can you put a PC just outside the firewall to do testing - this will
remove
the ISP router as an issue.


Bruce


-Original Message-
From: Jeff A. Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA / Web Access



I have been trouble shooting a problem for what feels like a year now
g. I'm hoping one of you guru's out there can guide me a little.


Problem: Unable to access OWA / Web site externally.


Platform: 1 server with E2K, Win 2K Server, IIS. 1 server with Win 2K
server that handles DNS, Wins, etc. 1 Netopia router, and 1 WatchGuard
Firebox II firewall.


Info: We can recieve and send email internal  externally fine.
Internally we can access OWA and our website. Our ISP reports that
everything is going thru the router (and nothing is being NAT'ed at this
level). Our firewall people say port 80 requests are making it thru the
firewall properly and that they are not being handled by E2K, and more
than likely its an SMTP connector problem. 


Frankly, at this point I am stumped...I inherited this mess and don't
even know how to proceed from here. Any thoughts?


Jeff Clarke
IT Manager
Micro Molding Technologies, LLC



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: How does one send an HTML formatted email?

2001-09-10 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: How does one send an HTML formatted email?





Create the document in Word - then select File - Send To - Mail Recipient.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 





-Original Message-
From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How does one send an HTML formatted email?



We would like to send a prepared HTML file not as an attachment but as an HTML formatted email using OUTLOOK. The server is set so that the user can choose either Plain Text or Rich Text Format. The client is set to format outgoing emails as HTML and Word has been chosen for editing email messages (we have also deselected Word in our tests), however Outlook only wants to send the file as an attachment or paste it as a text file. Would anyone have any idea of how to accomplish this task. In Outlook Express one can do this very easily!.


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: How does one send an HTML formatted email?

2001-09-10 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



I got the 
impression they tried that and outlook only wanted to send it as an attachment 
or plain text.

 
(we have also deselected Word in our tests), however Outlook only 
wants to send the file as an attachment or paste it as a text 
file.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Integrity has no need for 
rules. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 
  10, 2001 5:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  How does one send an HTML formatted email?
  I 
  leave Word out of the equation altogether. 
  
  Select Tools--Options--Mail Format
  Select HTML
  
  In a 
  new email: Format--HTML
  
  Or 
  am I missing something from this question?
  
  William
  
  Amend your favourite website:
  Smurf the web!
  http://websmurfer.devnull.net/
  Pity 
  the URL!
  http://firefly.sparse.org/~mrt/
  Pornolize
  http://www.pornolize.com/
  eJive?
  http://www.ejive.net/
  Or pick a dialect:
  http://rinkworks.com/dialect/
  http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/jbc/home/chef.html
  
  
  
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 
  3:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: How does 
  one send an HTML formatted email?
  Create the document in Word - then select File - Send To - 
  Mail Recipient. 
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I Special Projects 
  Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 
  91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  -Original Message- From: m2web 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:38 PM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: How does one send an 
  HTML formatted email? 
  We would like to send a prepared HTML file not as an 
  attachment but as an HTML formatted email using OUTLOOK. The server is set so 
  that the user can choose either Plain Text or Rich Text Format. The client is 
  set to format outgoing emails as HTML and Word has been chosen for editing 
  email messages (we have also deselected Word in our tests), however Outlook 
  only wants to send the file as an attachment or paste it as a text file. Would 
  anyone have any idea of how to accomplish this task. In Outlook Express one 
  can do this very easily!.
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





OWA Access from Different Server

2001-09-09 Thread Zangara, Jim



Hello

I am part of a WAN 
that has several bridgehead servers and about a hundred Exchange 5.5 sp4 
servers.

I am responsible for 
two of these servers that bothemail addresses on 
ourdomain.

One of these servers 
has a direct internet connection so we are using it for OWA.

Users who mailbox 
reside on that server have no problems at all accessing OWA.

Users whose 
mailboxes are on the other server cannot access it at all. 


They get Unable to 
get inbox - I know it is not an alias issue as we use the full SMTP 
address.

I thought it was 
trust but we have a reciprocal trust relationship and I can access all files on 
their domain and they can access all of mine. We also use wins replication 
that seems to be working fine (no error messages).

I am thinking I need 
a connector between the two servers. In looking at the setups (that I 
inherited) we have site connectors to different bridgehead 
servers.

Can anyone point me 
in the direction to go to learn how to set this up?

Could not find 
anything on Microsoft or in the archives.

Ordered a couple of 
books but would like to get a jump on this if possible.

TIA

Jim
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: SMTP Authentication

2001-09-06 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Users.

They like 
Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without having to 
(horrors) click something.

These people 
are sales people based in remote offices and not the most accepting of learning 
ANYTHING new.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

The only way to amuse some 
people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Sean Martin 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 
  06, 2001 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  SMTP Authentication
  I 
  forget..why isn't OWA an option?
  
  Regards,
  
  Sean Martin, 
  MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell  
  CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, 
  Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 
  229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 
2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP 
Authentication
Hello 
Could not find anything on the Archives on this so hopefully 
one of you will have dealt with it 
Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a 
Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in the 
process of implementing it. My boss has talked to MS PSS just to be 
sure and he is telling me we are going to need to use a different SMTP 
server for them to send against. I thought using the setting in the 
POP connector for Exchange to relay for authenticated users in conjunction 
with having the Outlook client be set to "My Server requires Authentication" 
should allow them to send. These guys will be using various methods of 
accessing the internet from DSL to dialup so I cannot set IP settings for 
it.
I have not implemented this yet but my tests from home using 
my cable modem seem ok. 
Any one have any insights? 
TIA 
Jim 
Why isn't the word "phonetically" spelled with an "f"? -- 
Steven Wright List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication 
  unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains 
  confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If 
  you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at 
  (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, 
  please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have 
  received the communication in error.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: SMTP Authentication

2001-09-06 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



Outlook can 
automatically check pop accounts at intervals - say 5 
minutes.

Offices are 
part of the organization and I have requested either to put them on the WAN or 
to allowVPN which we have availablebut higher ups want it this 
way. 

I even 
suggested leaving them on the old server which is a pop server and just set up 
CR's for them to get them on the GAL but got shot down on 
that.

I don't like 
doing it this way personally but


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Let a fool hold his tongue 
and he will pass for a sage. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Sean Martin 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 
  06, 2001 2:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  SMTP Authentication
  Well 
  correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're implementing POP, won't the users have 
  to click something to send/receive their messages, even from 
  Outlook?
  
  Are 
  these remote offices part of your organization? Is setting up a VPN between 
  eachoffice an option?
  
  Regards,
  
  Sean Martin, 
  MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell  
  CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, 
  Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 
  229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 
2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
SMTP Authentication
Users.

They 
like Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without 
having to (horrors) click something.

These 
people are sales people based in remote offices and not the most accepting 
of learning ANYTHING new.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

The only way to amuse 
some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Sean Martin 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  September 06, 2001 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication
  I forget..why isn't OWA an option?
  
  Regards,
  
  Sean Martin, 
  MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell  
  CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 
  300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 
  561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 
06, 2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: SMTP Authentication
Hello 
Could not find anything on the Archives on this so 
hopefully one of you will have dealt with it 
Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a 
Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in the 
process of implementing it. My boss has talked to MS PSS just to 
be sure and he is telling me we are going to need to use a different 
SMTP server for them to send against. I thought using the setting 
in the POP connector for Exchange to relay for authenticated users in 
conjunction with having the Outlook client be set to "My Server requires 
Authentication" should allow them to send. These guys will be 
using various methods of accessing the internet from DSL to dialup so I 
cannot set IP settings for it.
I have not implemented this yet but my tests from home 
using my cable modem seem ok. 
Any one have any insights? 
TIA 
Jim 
Why isn't the word "phonetically" spelled with an "f"? 
-- Steven Wright List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this 
  communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail 
  communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended 
  only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, 
  please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the 
  sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the 
  sender immediately that you have received the communication in 
  error.List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  DO

RE: POP access to email

2001-09-06 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



William 
-

Was 
rereading your response and just noticed the second line 


POP 
doesn't support subfolders below the inbox, either.

Is that just in Exchange POP? 


I have always had multiple subfolders below my inbox 
on the old POP server we are moving off of.

Thanks.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

One night I walked home 
very late and fell asleep in somebody's satellite dish. My dreams were showing 
up on TV's all over the world. -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  September 04, 2001 11:29 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: POP access to email
  If 
  these clients are in the office sometimes and away other times, there is a 
  client setting to leave a copy of email on the server.
  
  POP 
  doesn't support subfolders below the inbox, either.
  
  Not 
  that these things matter since we'll all be switching to 
  WindowsRG:
  
  http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/uploads/27000/27549_winrg2.swf
  William
  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 
  2001 11:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  POP access to email
  Thanks 
  William - 
  
  I was 
  looking in the archives for your responses to POP. I was thinking it 
  missed some point of antivirus scanning but cannot image that anti-gen would 
  leave such a big hole.
  
  If I can 
  allow pop then my life just got a bit easier.
  
  Appreciate 
  the help.
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
  Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks 
  A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
  Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
  461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  No question is so 
  difficult as that to which the answer is obvious. 
  

-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
September 04, 2001 11:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: POP access to email
It's not *bad* practice.

It's one of the client options.

You must properly secure your server against relay should you allow 
SMTP from the same POP clients. 

Personally, I favour IMAP as the remote client 
protocol.

William

-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 
2001 11:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: POP 
access to email
I remember reading on here many months ago that it is a bad 
practice to allow users to pop into your exchange server. 
I cannot remember why and I am running that battle 
now. 
I searched the archives but do not see anything. 
Can someone point me in the right direction? 
Jim 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: SMTP Authentication

2001-09-06 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



not a Clear 
Channel issue - just our little division - they even have stranger rules but I 
am not going to go there.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

You are going to have a new 
love affair. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Sean Martin 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 
  06, 2001 2:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  SMTP Authentication
  Bummer. Well I think Clear Channel has a couple of stations up 
  here in Anchorage. I could round up some people that are listeners and call 
  the powers that be and voice our disapproval of their suggested configuration 
  for remote access to corporate email. If you think that would help. 
  ;o)
  
  Wish 
  I could be of more help. Good luck.
  
  Regards,
  
  Sean Martin, 
  MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell  
  CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, 
  Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 
  229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 06, 
2001 1:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
SMTP Authentication
Outlook 
can automatically check pop accounts at intervals - say 5 
minutes.

Offices 
are part of the organization and I have requested either to put them on the 
WAN or to allowVPN which we have availablebut higher ups want it 
this way. 

I even 
suggested leaving them on the old server which is a pop server and just set 
up CR's for them to get them on the GAL but got shot down on 
that.

I don't 
like doing it this way personally but


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura 
Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 
461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Let a fool hold his 
tongue and he will pass for a sage. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Sean Martin 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  September 06, 2001 2:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication
  Well correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're implementing POP, won't 
  the users have to click something to send/receive their messages, even 
  from Outlook?
  
  Are these remote offices part of your organization? Is setting up a 
  VPN between eachoffice an option?
  
  Regards,
  
  Sean Martin, 
  MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell  
  CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 
  300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 
  561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 
06, 2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication
Users.

They 
like Outlook - they like the automatic checking for new messages without 
having to (horrors) click something.

These people are sales people based in remote offices and not the 
most accepting of learning ANYTHING new.


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 
Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

The only way to 
amuse some people is to slip and fall on an icy pavement. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Sean 
  Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: SMTP Authentication
  I forget..why isn't OWA an option?
  
  Regards,
  
  Sean Martin, 
  MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell  
  CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 
  300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 
  561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 
September 06, 2001 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: SMTP Authentication
Hello 
Could not find anything on the Archives on this so 
hopefully one of you will have dealt with it 
Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6a 
Sent a question about POP a few days ago and am in 
the process

POP access to email

2001-09-04 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: POP access to email





I remember reading on here many months ago that it is a bad practice to allow users to pop into your exchange server.


I cannot remember why and I am running that battle now.


I searched the archives but do not see anything.


Can someone point me in the right direction?


Jim







List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: POP access to email

2001-09-04 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



most of 
these guys use a pst anyways.
 
 I know I know - but do they 
listen?

I am just 
waiting for the next computer crash so I get the luxury of saying I told you 
so.

Would love 
to do OWA but these people are "too important" to bother with 
that.
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

My school colors were 
clear. We used to say, "I'm not naked, I'm in the band." -- Steven Wright 


  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  September 04, 2001 11:20 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: POP access to email
  For 
  starters? The first time one of your users sucks all his email off the server, 
  they will know.
  Second, OWA
  

-Original Message-----From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 
2001 11:08 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: POP 
access to email
I remember reading on here many months ago that it is a bad 
practice to allow users to pop into your exchange server. 
I cannot remember why and I am running that battle 
now. 
I searched the archives but do not see anything. 
Can someone point me in the right direction? 
Jim 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





DL's in OWA

2001-08-29 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: DL's in OWA






Strange problem -


Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 sp6a


User created DL's available in Outlook - stored in their Exchange profile are not available from OWA. I see several blank contact records that I am assuming are these but no way to access them. Is there a workaround for this? I searched MS but could not find anything.

TIA


Jim




There are no accidents whatsoever in the universe. --Baba Ram Dass 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: DL's in OWA

2001-08-29 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: DL's in OWA






Didn't know that - Thanks



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DL's in OWA



It is a known issue that in any version of Exchange Server Outlook contact distribution lists are not supported by OWA.


Siegfried /


-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DL's in OWA



Strange problem - 
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 sp6a 
User created DL's available in Outlook - stored in their Exchange profile are not available from OWA.  I see several blank contact records that I am assuming are these but no way to access them.  Is there a workaround for this?  I searched MS but could not find anything. TIA 

Jim 


There are no accidents whatsoever in the universe. --Baba Ram Dass 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: SMTP Servers

2001-08-28 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: SMTP Servers





SLMail from Seattle Labs and Imail from Ipswitch are decent pop 3 email servers.


-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP Servers



Hello All,

Does anybody know of any good alternatives to Exchange. I have a client
that has about 5 users and doesn't want to pay the price for Exchange so
i am searching for a cheaper, or better yet free, alternative. Any
recommendations?
.+-

@Aͫa20 z[lpjofZ\嶅zm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Orbz

2001-08-27 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: RE: Orbz





Sorry - should have been more specific.


Not my exchange server. Client's pop3 ipswitch server set wide open for relay. Not on my network at all. Jerk of a client I am probably going to drop but I hate walking away from something that is half a**ed set up. Owner wants to send and receive his ixnet.com account from his office and won't take no for an answer.

Maybe if his corporate email starts bouncing


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Orbz



VPN from home, or OWA.

You will not be able to send or receive mail from 20 % of population, if you are on Open Relay List.


-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Orbz




What are the consequences of an open relay? I know of one that I cannot get them to change because one users wants to send email from his home account. It makes me angry but they will not listen. Maybe if I show them some valid reason other than being black listed they might wake up.

Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 





-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:55 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Orbz 



 And I also don't like the fact that some outside organization is
determining how we as admins set up our systems. 


When your system is configured as an open relay, then spammers are able to
steal your resources and use them to steal other people's resources. They're
not forcing anyone to use their lists - the lists are available as a service
only. The people who use those lists have chosen not to receive mail from
open relays. They're merely protecting their own property from misguided
and/or malicious property owners/caretakers such as those who run open
relays. 


You are free to ignore them, if you wish. But you must be prepared to deal
with the consequences if you do. 


BTW, Siegfried, how's that Event Sink coming to allow E2K to use the RBL? 


-Michèle 
Immigration site:  http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
http://LadySun1969.tripod.com  
Our new 2001 Miata:  http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley  
Tiggercam:  http://www.tiggercam.co.uk http://www.tiggercam.co.uk  
- 
Diplomacy is the art of saying nice doggie!... Till you can find a rock. 
- 



-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:38 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Orbz 



I have been watching my IMS queue. I haven't found any from ORBZ but from
ORBS Mail-abuse, RBS or something like that and two others I just can't
remember.


I haven't had a problem with them removing me from there lists, usually
takes less than a day and usually in a few hours. 


I don't like the fact that you get black listed and you are not notified.
And I also don't like the fact that some outside organization is determining
how we as admins set up our systems. I know I can't fight it, but it is the
way it is. 


Joseph Radar Mann, MCT, MCSE 
x4550 
epage [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:16 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Orbz 


Individual mail admins can block on their own, even without using one of the
blackhole lists. 


Also check www.mail-abuse.org to make sure you're not in their RBL. 


-Michèle 
Immigration site:  http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
http://LadySun1969.tripod.com  
Our new 2001 Miata:  http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley  
Tiggercam:  http://www.tiggercam.co.uk http://www.tiggercam.co.uk  
- 
I can make this light before it changes. - Famous Last Words 
- 



-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:10 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Orbz 



I found a junior admin had opened us up. I fixed it, twice, fixed the
Junior Admin once, and am still finding sites that blocks us