[newbie-it] unscribe

2000-09-27 Per discussione ZILIANI Andrea





Fw: [newbie-it] unsubscribe

2000-09-27 Per discussione Francesco Parrotta




- Original Message - 
From: Francesco 
Parrotta 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:30 AM
Subject: [newbie-it] unscribe




[newbie-it] unscribe

2000-09-27 Per discussione Marco . Malinverni






[newbie-it] unsubscribe

2000-09-27 Per discussione ZILIANI Andrea






RE: [newbie-it] lancio di una shell dal desktot KDE

2000-09-27 Per discussione Giovanni Adinolfi

intendevo come collegarlo ad un icona del desktop

grazie
mago merlino

Il mer, 27 set 2000, hai scritto:
 Guarda bene il "desktop" (scrivania) : ci dev'essere la rappresentazione di 
 un piccolo monitor
 sul pannello di kde.
 Clicca li' e sim-sala-bim ecco una console..
 ciao
 
 = Original Message from Giovanni Adinolfi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 at 27/09/00 12.42
 salve,
 vorrei lanciare una shell dal desktot, come posso farlo??
 
 Giovanni Adinolfi




RE: [newbie-it] lancio di una shell dal desktot KDE

2000-09-27 Per discussione Sergio Agosti

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 intendevo come collegarlo ad un icona del desktop
 
 grazie
 mago merlino
 
 Il mer, 27 set 2000, hai scritto:
  Guarda bene il "desktop" (scrivania) : ci dev'essere la rappresentazione di 
  un piccolo monitor
  sul pannello di kde.
  Clicca li' e sim-sala-bim ecco una console..
  ciao
  
  = Original Message from Giovanni Adinolfi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  at 27/09/00 12.42
  salve,
  vorrei lanciare una shell dal desktot, come posso farlo??
  
  Giovanni Adinolfi

Ciao, ecco il collemamento per lanciare la bash, copialo sul desktop (se non
funziona ti spiego come crearlo).
 Bash.kdelnk


[newbie-it] problemi con il kernel

2000-09-27 Per discussione marco

salve, ho dei problemi a compilare il kernel:
nella dir usr/src/linux dò il comando make xconfig, e mi viene risposto:

"no rule to make target 'xconfig'. stop.
premetto che accedo da root e che non funziona neanche con make config
o menuconfig.
saluti Marco





Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mwinold

In a message dated 26-Sep-00 21:27:25 Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

 So I buy a
 Ford. 
oh buy an engine that is impossible to work on and dies all the time sounds 
like

WINDOWS!!!
ford = windows of the automobile industry




[newbie] Questions triggered by glibconfig.h not found

2000-09-27 Per discussione Rick Commo

Not sure if this question belongs here or in [expert], so I'll start here
since I've just subscribed to both.

I am a fairly recent Mandrake 7.1 user.  After purchasing "GTK+ / Gnome
Applications Development" I needed to install the various support libraries.
I used RPMDrake and installed a bunch of developer libs that came on the MD
7.1 CDs.

I tried compiling a simple "hello world" program with the addition of the
line
#include gnome.h

This was done to check header dependencies.  I got an error along the lines
of "glibconfig.h not found".  I know that glibconfig.h exists at the path
/usr/lib/glib/include/glibconfig.h.

glibconfig.h is referenced in various GTK headers as
#include glibconfig.h

This would lead me to believe that any GTK app compiles will have to be done
with -I options pointing to "/usr/lib/glib/include" (and a lot o others as
well).

So I assume that I was quite naive to try the compile with the simple
command
cc foo.c

The questions:

(1) Is it normal practice to just use a simple "#include name.h" statement
in .C and .H files and then use -I options for the root paths?  That seems
to be the case.

(2) Would it be considered good style to globally define include options
sets at the shell level so that you can have them quickly in any simple
makefile or do most people define over and over again in each makefile.   I
realize that doing the former will tie the makefile to a particular user
environment, but I am curious.

Cheers and thanks,
-rick






[newbie] gaim config

2000-09-27 Per discussione Frank Morris

I just installed 7.1, everything seems to be working fine, except when I
tried to log on to gaim I was told that it was "not configured" now what
do I do?

Thanks,

Frank





Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Jay

On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 Has any one heard?
 
 The Microsoft Antitrust Case is going to a lower court. And if George W.
 Bush has his way. Mr. Bill
 will be able add - force people to accept what comes with Windows? It's a
 sad day.
 
 Just my $0.02
 
 Roman
-- 
Pardon my French, but who gives a s**t.  Let Microcrap do what they want. 
Let's face it, they have had ZERO innovation since the release of Windoze 95. 
Each "upgrade" is basically cosmetic with a few OEM packages thrown in for
added "benefits".  Windoze ME is worthless and not necessary.  Let them act how
they want, they will get theirs in the end.  Once other OS's (Linux, the new OS
X) start to take off in the desktop market, they will be forced to reactbut
remember, everything Microsoft has they bought or stole from somebody...let's
see 'em try to buy Linux.  I think Gates might have to look up Open-source in a
dictionary.

Jay
"May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your heart with 
gladness, that stays forever after."
"May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
http://www.mrsnooky.com





Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Robin Regennitter

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:

Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related to
Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But what
I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.

Rob

 On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  Has any one heard?
  
  The Microsoft Antitrust Case is going to a lower court. And if George W.
  Bush has his way. Mr. Bill
  will be able add - force people to accept what comes with Windows? It's a
  sad day.
  
  Just my $0.02
  
  Roman
 -- 
 Pardon my French, but who gives a s**t.  Let Microcrap do what they want. 
 Let's face it, they have had ZERO innovation since the release of Windoze 95. 
 Each "upgrade" is basically cosmetic with a few OEM packages thrown in for
 added "benefits".  Windoze ME is worthless and not necessary.  Let them act how
 they want, they will get theirs in the end.  Once other OS's (Linux, the new OS
 X) start to take off in the desktop market, they will be forced to reactbut
 rremember, everything Microsoft has they bought or stole from somebody...let's
 see 'em try to buy Linux.  I think Gates might have to look up Open-source in a
 dictionary.
 
 Jay
 "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your heart with 
gladness, that stays forever after."
 "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
 http://www.mrsnooky.com




Re: [newbie] gaim config

2000-09-27 Per discussione Jay

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 I just installed 7.1, everything seems to be working fine, except when I
 tried to log on to gaim I was told that it was "not configured" now what
 do I do?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Frank
-- 
Get the latest release.  I believe it to be at http://www.marko.net or
something like that.  Maybe Cnet has it.


Jay
"May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your heart with 
gladness, that stays forever after."
"May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
http://www.mrsnooky.com





Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Jay

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 
 Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related to
 Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But what
 I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
 

--
It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very stable and
easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!  So, although
it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.


Jay
"May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your heart with 
gladness, that stays forever after."
"May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
http://www.mrsnooky.com





[Re: Re: [newbie] 7.1 Post-install problem - re-post! ]

2000-09-27 Per discussione elldee

Mark

Thanks for this.

try reinstalling and this time don't do the HDD optimization. I don't
think with a drive that big and a system as efficient as linux that you're
going to really need to worry about optimizing, and I suspect that there
is a small , but apparently noticable enough hardware conflict going on
there. I also suspect that it will all evaporate as soon as you install
without optimizing.

I don't actually remember 'choosing' HDD optimisation! I'll have to go
do it again... paying more attention this time :-).

I don't think I'll get a chance to try it before Saturday but I'll
let you know the result.

Thanks again.

Lance





Re: [newbie] Messages are repeating themselves...

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mark Weaver

Ken,

Thank you very much. That little recipe got slammed into the .procmailrc
file REAL quick. Awesome!

thanks again,

-- 
Mark

**  =/\=  No Penguins were harmed   | ICQ#27816299
** _||_ in the making of this |
**  =\/=  message...| Registered Linux user #182496


On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Ken Wahl wrote:

 On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Has anyone else noticed that the messages are repeating themselves on the
  list?
  
  
 
 A few but not too many, maybe 4-5/day.  If they are identical messages
 with the same message id and you are using procmail, you can weed them out
 by adding the following as the first recipe in your .procmailrc
 
 :0 Wh: msgid.lock
 | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
 
 This will create a message id cache file in your mail directory that is
 checked against before any mail is delivered to your inbox(es).  Since all
 emails have a unique message id unless they are true duplicates or carbon
 copies then they will only make it through if the message id is not
 already in the cache file.  If the message id matches one found in the
 cache then the message is discarded.
 
 I've been using it for the past couple of weeks and it works well,
 especially at removing list replies that are cc'd to the original author.
 
 The full documentation for the above is listed in man procmailex.
 
 HTH
 





Re: [newbie] OpenGL

2000-09-27 Per discussione John Couturier

OpenGL, is the "Mesa" rpms.  You will need to make sure you install the Mesa-devel rpm 
for the compile to work.  They should be on the CD.




-- Original Message --
From: KompuKit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 21:41:22 -0400

I have a Pentium 233 MMX 64 mg ram
a S3 video card Rev 1.0 drivers (in windows)

I'm trying to install a game: Search and Rescue for Linux
helicopter game that requires OpenGL...
it won't compile...unless it's on my system...
I have Mandrake 7.02...does this come on the CD?
if so, what's the RPM called...
-- 
 Registered Linux User:167369
=KompuKit=
Kit Goins   ICQ# 7110071
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lowell, Mass.
Web Designerhttp://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
WebServer:  http://kompukit.dyndns.org
(Server Runs between M - F 6pm-12am, S  S 12pm-12am EST)
=KompuKit=






[newbie] 56K MDC modem not working...

2000-09-27 Per discussione weller


Dear all,

Please help - I am only one step away from configuring Linux (Mandrake 7.1)
and removing Windows from my machine FOREVER :)

At present I can't get Linux to recognise my modem - I am pretty sure that
it is not a Winmodem (there isn't anything anywhere that says it is a
Winmodem #8211; the words "HSP, HCF, or DSP" do not appear at all). It is
a 56K Main-Daughter-Card clone, not a PCMCIA card, but built on the mother
board.

If I were to install the drivers under Windows the Modem will come up
under:

'? Other Devices' - '? PCI Card'

in the Device Manager and would run in COM3 (ttsy2). Yes - it was not
listed under #8216;modems#8217; in Windows, but under '? Other Devices'.
Although when the Windows driver was installed it magically changed to a
modem!?!

I didn't try on configure it while installing Linux. I have tried kppp
since installation and then tried to communicate with it, but it says that
the modem is busy? So I presume it is there #8211; just doing something
#8211; maybe a lock file somewhere?

This is all the information that I can obtain from the modem: 
MODEM 56K MDC
COM 3
IRQ 5
Address D800
Manufacturer - Compact Flash Technology

The laptop is a Chicony MP-995 machine. What I can get from the manual is:
Intel BGA-1 on board uPGA-1 socket for Celeron
Intel 440MX

Any guesses / answers? Should I have configured it whilst installation - or
does this not matter?

Many thanks in advance,
Andy

-- 
Andy Weller
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.

I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.

Any *useful* information now??

On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
  grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.
   
 you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  




Re: [newbie] 7.1 Post-install problem - re-post!

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

I would look in my /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit file and 
check for references to hdparm commands,
when you find these, you can then comment them
out if you like or change them to your liking.

There should be some info on this (the hdparm command
and its parameters) on http://www.mandrakeuser.org
just do a search for hdparm or visit:

http://www.mandrakeuser.org/hardware/hide2.html



On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Patti Wavinak wrote:
 If I recall correctly when you install it says that it is NOT a good idea 
 to set the hard drive optimisation function. I do not know if you can 
 "undo" that or if you need to reinstall and not use that function.
 
 I don't know if this helps but at least I answered giggle
 
 Patti - Registered Linux User #184611
 
  Original Message 
 
 On 9/26/00, 3:47:31 PM, Lance Dow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding 
 [newbie] 7.1 Post-install problem - re-post!:
 
 
  Hi There
 
  I posted the message below to the list on Saturday. So far, I've had only
  one response which, unfortunatly, didn't take me forward in any 
 meaningful
  way (thanks anyway Paul). I can't believe no one else knows the answer.
 
  Can sombody help me out... please?
 
  Lance
  __
 
  Hi Guys
 
  Finally got 7.1 installed on my new system - Athlon 700, 128MB, 13.6G HDD 
 -
  Linux only, no Windows. It all seemed to be going smoothly until it came 
 to
  the first re-boot. It reached the point where it says;
 
  Starting hard drive optimisation for hda  [OK]
 
  then it goes no further. I left it in that state for over an hour and it
  never moved. I could hear what sounds like disk accessing at round one
  minute intervals but  don't see any activity on the HDD light to confirm
  this.
 
  Any ideas where I go from here? How do I go about tracking down what the
  problem might be? I created a boot disk during the install and, I 
 suppose,
  I could use this to start the system. But I have absolutely no Idea what
  I'm looking for!
 
  One more thing. This message is part of the Interactive Startup (or Setup 
 -
  not sure). Is this anything like the setup on Windows where you can step
  through the entries in autoexec.bat and config.sys at boot-up, choosing
  which drivers etc are loaded? If so, how do I do it under Linux?
 
  Is there a troubleshooting HOWTO that covers this sort of thing?
 
  All help gratefully received.
 
  Regards
 
 
  Lance Dow




[newbie] Netscape browser...

2000-09-27 Per discussione Robert Griffiths

Hi, can anybody tell me how i can get colour on the netscape browsers 
interface, it's grey and the pic's on the buttons are black...if their's 
supposed to be colour that is. Any help would be great, thank's in advance..

 Robert.
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.





Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

No kidding thats why Billyboy hates linux, he can't touch it haha!

On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Mark Weaver wrote:
 Not really...He can't do a thing to the beautiful OS I'm running on my box
 that will likely still be running WITHOUT being rebooted once till they
 finally get done doodling around in court! I don't look for that to happen
 for another 5-10 years at least.
 
 -- 
 Mark
 
 **  =/\=  No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299
 ** _||_ in the making of this   |
 **  =\/=  message...  | Registered Linux user #182496
 
 
 On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Romanator wrote:
 
  Has any one heard?
  
  The Microsoft Antitrust Case is going to a lower court. And if George W.
  Bush has his way. Mr. Bill
  will be able add - force people to accept what comes with Windows? It's a
  sad day.
  
  Just my $0.02
  
  Roman
  
  
 




Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Ronald J. Hall

Robin Regennitter wrote:
 
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 
 Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related to
 Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But what
 I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
 
 Rob

AFAIK, Mac OS-X (and thats "ten", BTW), is the classic, slick Mac GUI sitting
on top of a version of BSD Unix. My little brother just paid $30 for a beta
version that he is going to install on his iBook. (go figure-paying that for a
beta! smile)

I watched a quicktime movie of this new OS in action, and it *looks* good, but
really, what can you tell from watching a demo? Give me hands on, everytime. ;)

-- 
 
   /\
   DarkLord
   \/




[newbie] ipchains and ssh

2000-09-27 Per discussione george . f . workman


Hello,

My first post on the newbie list...

I have been struggling for some time to get SSH to work on my Linux box
(2.2.13-4mdk : Mandrake 6.1).
I believe I finally have it up and running, because I am able to create a
SSH connection from/to the machine itself.

What I can't seem to manage is to make a SSH connection from an external
machine (I work in DC, Linux box is at home in OH).   I am trying using
FiSSH and I repeatedly get "Failed to Connect to Host."

Now, I do have a firewall up, and it is a pretty basic one in order to
provide IP-Masquerading (which works!), so I thought
maybe my problem was simply that the firewall wasn't letting the connection
to port 22.  So, after extensive research I felt
that what I needed to add was a couple rules to allow the connection in,
and I tried to add something like this (and other
similar variations):

ipchains -A input -p tcp -s xxx.xxx.com -d yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 22 -j ACCEPT
ipchains -A output -p tcp -d xxx.xxx.com -d yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 22 -j ACCEPT

But it isn't working - and I think my problem lies with xxx.xxx.com and
yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy (the source and destination addresses).

1.  I don't exactly know the source IP address for where I'm at, so is it
acceptable to use xxx.xxx.com instead?
2.  I have a variable IP - so how the heck do I populate yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
with my current IP address if I don't even know it?

For #2 - I've seen some people use $IPADDR which is all well and good, but
I don't know how to populate that variable without simply hardcoding and
that just presents the same problem again.

In addition, I typed in the ipchains commands (both above) at the command
prompt and used what my IP address is currently and I still couldn't
connect to it remotely via SSH.So now my entire solution has been
undermined.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
George





Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione David Boles


On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:42:33 -0500, Vic said:

 oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
  
  I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.
  
  Any *useful* information now??

With an attitude like that you will find that "help' is hard to come by
around here.

If you had spent more than a few seconds looking around you might have
found this:

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/Demo/Mandrake7.1/QuickLook/grub.
php3

  
  On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time, 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.
 
   you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  
  
  
  

-- 

David Boles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





RE: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mark Johnson

Pardon my heresy, but I don't think Linux will make it as a viable
alternative desktop for the masses (no offense intended)  for the following
reasons: 

1) the Linux community is too decentralized. 

2) there are no such things as standards, even defacto standards - Cut 
Paste is an example - there is not even any social pressure for developers
to adhere to a standard.

3) window managers make things too different - a nightmare for the corporate
world, even though you're running Mandrake (or Debian, or whatever) your
window manager makes the environment foreign to anyone that doesn't run that
window manager.

4) Linux developers work for free and are not subject to the same QA that
Apple is subject to.

5) Linux developers work for free; consequently their incentives to create
and contribute are different

6) Linux users in general would probably balk if they had to actually pay
for software

7) the average computer user is *required* to make *a lot* of effort
understanding how to "operate" the machine.  The complexity is not
sufficiently hidden from them when needed

8) there is a certain amount of elitism within the Linux community in
general which distains the stereotypical "aol/microsoft" user (no offense,
just an observation)

9) Linux is inherently a programmers/developers environment and
*specifically* geared to those kinds of folks

10) talk like what I'm doing here is not well received by the Linux
community in general

Again, don't get me wrong I really, really like Linux ( window managers)
and I would really like to see it be a viable alternative desktop. But from
my personal observations  (painful) personal experience and knowing the
expectations  abilities of my friends  family, it's not there yet.  I
don't expect it to be there in the next 5 to 10 years (even considering
internet time).  I think there will need to be a broad change in perception
among the Linux folks about the "computing world for average folks" before
that will happen.  Unfortunately, I think Linux will have to be backwardly
compatible with MAC and Windows - whatever that means.

ps: I've just installed HelixGnome (www.helixgnome.com) and it looks really
good though I haven't had a chance to use it yet!

-Original Message-
From: Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 2:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush


On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
-- 
Pardon my French, but who gives a s**t.  Let Microcrap do what they want. 
Let's face it, they have had ZERO innovation since the release of Windoze
95. 
Each "upgrade" is basically cosmetic with a few OEM packages thrown in for
added "benefits".  Windoze ME is worthless and not necessary.  Let them act
how
they want, they will get theirs in the end.  Once other OS's (Linux, the new
OS
X) start to take off in the desktop market, they will be forced to
reactbut
remember, everything Microsoft has they bought or stole from
somebody...let's
see 'em try to buy Linux.  I think Gates might have to look up Open-source
in a
dictionary.

Jay
"May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your
heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
"May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
http://www.mrsnooky.com





RE: [newbie] Installing 7.1 hangs at formatting boot partition

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mark Johnson

Thanks to everybody for their responses...

For the record what I had to do was use 7.0 installation CD to setup how I
wanted the drive partitioned then exited the installation after that step
and rebooted with the 7.1 CD and everything worked from there.  

I noticed that using auto-allocate on 7.1 it put the swap partition at the
front of the disk, however 7.0 put the swap in the middle with the /boot
partion in the front.  This might have been the problem as I think about it
more.  Does the /boot parition have to be located at the first physical part
of the drive?

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Installing 7.1 hangs at formatting boot partition

I had the same problem when I tried to do an upgrade. I solved the
problem by installing on a second hard drive, going to diskdrake on the
second hd, formatting the first hd as one partition. Once that was done
I went back to the first hd and did a clean install. Did not use the hd
optimizations... repeat, did not use the optimizations. Every thing went
just hunky dory. This is one solution if you have the space on a second
hd. Otherwise, I am at a loss to help. Dennis
-- 
Dennis M. a registered Linux User #180842




Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione F. E. Schaper

Hey Y'all,

Before I got into using Linux I used various versions of the MAC O/S and I
always found it to be somewhat unstable, the one thing I did like about it
was the fact that it was not nearly as dumbed down as Windows, it is easy to
use, but you still need to have some kind of understanding as to what the
machine is doing. Hopefully when OS/X gets all the way (it is available in
server packages) out they will somehow port it to run on Intel based
processor machines, and hopefully the stability problems will be corrected,
without having to compromise the ease of use.
If these things happen, and the work on developing a more consumer friendly
Linux product continues, Microsoft could be in for quite a shock.

Of course bad news for Bill is good news for the rest of us.

I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
television?

I may have to move to Canada next year.

Fritz




- Original Message -
From: Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush


On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:

 Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related
to
 Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But
what
 I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.


--
It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very stable
and
easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!  So,
although
it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.


Jay
"May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your
heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
"May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
http://www.mrsnooky.com








Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione bpremeaux

I don't have any screen shots I can forward, but you 
could look at 'info grub' which is the manual (I'm still 
trying to figure out how to print it out.  It's stuffed
into a couple *.bz2 files.)  Another excellent resource is - 

http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-faq.html

I hope these help.

Barry :-)

On Wed, 27 September 2000, Vic wrote:

 
 oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
 
 I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.
 
 Any *useful* information now??
 
 On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
   grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.

  you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  


_
The freedom to choose your own Internet access price.
Surfree.com - got to be free
http://www.surfree.com




Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Jon Roig

An intel port of OS-X is never going to happen. The whole Apple vision
depends on a consistent box to go with the OS -- in this case, a box that
only apple makes.

-- jon




 From: "F. E. Schaper" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:33:18 -0400
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
 
 Hey Y'all,
 
 Before I got into using Linux I used various versions of the MAC O/S and I
 always found it to be somewhat unstable, the one thing I did like about it
 was the fact that it was not nearly as dumbed down as Windows, it is easy to
 use, but you still need to have some kind of understanding as to what the
 machine is doing. Hopefully when OS/X gets all the way (it is available in
 server packages) out they will somehow port it to run on Intel based
 processor machines, and hopefully the stability problems will be corrected,
 without having to compromise the ease of use.
 If these things happen, and the work on developing a more consumer friendly
 Linux product continues, Microsoft could be in for quite a shock.
 
 Of course bad news for Bill is good news for the rest of us.
 
 I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
 that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
 Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
 approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
 television?
 
 I may have to move to Canada next year.
 
 Fritz
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
 
 
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 
 Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related
 to
 Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But
 what
 I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
 
 
 --
 It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very stable
 and
 easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!  So,
 although
 it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.
 
 
 Jay
 "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your
 heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
 "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
 http://www.mrsnooky.com
 
 
 
 
 





Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Jeff Malka

That is not very nice.  The guy was just trying to help and you bit off his
head.

Jeff Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux user  183185

- Original Message -
From: Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?


 oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.

 I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.

 Any *useful* information now??

 On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
   Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
   grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.

  you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  







Re: [newbie] ipchains and ssh

2000-09-27 Per discussione Daniel J. Ferris

At 08:11 AM 9/27/00 -0500, you wrote:

Hello,

My first post on the newbie list...

I have been struggling for some time to get SSH to work on my Linux box
(2.2.13-4mdk : Mandrake 6.1).
I believe I finally have it up and running, because I am able to create a
SSH connection from/to the machine itself.

What I can't seem to manage is to make a SSH connection from an external
machine (I work in DC, Linux box is at home in OH).   I am trying using
FiSSH and I repeatedly get "Failed to Connect to Host."

Now, I do have a firewall up, and it is a pretty basic one in order to
provide IP-Masquerading (which works!), so I thought
maybe my problem was simply that the firewall wasn't letting the connection
to port 22.  So, after extensive research I felt
that what I needed to add was a couple rules to allow the connection in,
and I tried to add something like this (and other
similar variations):

ipchains -A input -p tcp -s xxx.xxx.com -d yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 22 -j ACCEPT
ipchains -A output -p tcp -d xxx.xxx.com -d yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 22 -j ACCEPT

But it isn't working - and I think my problem lies with xxx.xxx.com and
yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy (the source and destination addresses).

1.  I don't exactly know the source IP address for where I'm at, so is it
acceptable to use xxx.xxx.com instead?
2.  I have a variable IP - so how the heck do I populate yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
with my current IP address if I don't even know it?

For #2 - I've seen some people use $IPADDR which is all well and good, but
I don't know how to populate that variable without simply hardcoding and
that just presents the same problem again.

In addition, I typed in the ipchains commands (both above) at the command
prompt and used what my IP address is currently and I still couldn't
connect to it remotely via SSH.So now my entire solution has been
undermined.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
George



I have the exact same setup as you do (almost) and ssh works from anywhere.

I just did this

ipchains -A input -p tcp -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 22 -j ACCEPT

If you are really concerned about the source address, try using the ip 
address instead of the hostname/DNS name, because it may resolve to 
something unexpected.

As you can see, in my example, I wasn't concerned with the source 
address.  Only the destination address and port number.

Dan





Re: [[newbie] Linux-Mandrake 7.2 Beta 3 - Hangs on shutdown]

2000-09-27 Per discussione Starz McCllelan

With this beta I've been getting a garbled screen and it would seem like it's
frozen but it's still going and it actually make it to shutdown ...

Starz

"Adam" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 - 
   Attachment:  
   MIME Type: multipart/alternative 
 - 
I use GDM for my login manager, when I goto reboot after logging out it just
hangs (doesn't even un-mount or kill any processes of any sort)



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

Well he flames people  can't I flame him too?

BTW thanks for the url

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Boles wrote:
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:42:33 -0500, Vic said:
 
  oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
   
   I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.
   
   Any *useful* information now??
 
 With an attitude like that you will find that "help' is hard to come by
 around here.
 
 If you had spent more than a few seconds looking around you might have
 found this:
 
 http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/Demo/Mandrake7.1/QuickLook/grub.
 php3
 
   
   On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
 grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.
  
you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  
   
   
   
 
 -- 
 
 David Boles
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

I tried that url, is the server down?

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Boles wrote:
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:42:33 -0500, Vic said:
 
  oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
   
   I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.
   
   Any *useful* information now??
 
 With an attitude like that you will find that "help' is hard to come by
 around here.
 
 If you had spent more than a few seconds looking around you might have
 found this:
 
 http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/Demo/Mandrake7.1/QuickLook/grub.
 php3
 
   
   On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
 grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.
  
you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  
   
   
   
 
 -- 
 
 David Boles
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

Many many many thanks!

Excellent!

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I don't have any screen shots I can forward, but you 
 could look at 'info grub' which is the manual (I'm still 
 trying to figure out how to print it out.  It's stuffed
 into a couple *.bz2 files.)  Another excellent resource is - 
 
 http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-faq.html
 
 I hope these help.
 
 Barry :-)
 
 On Wed, 27 September 2000, Vic wrote:
 
  
  oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
  
  I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.
  
  Any *useful* information now??
  
  On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time, 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.
 
   you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  
 
 
 _
 The freedom to choose your own Internet access price.
 Surfree.com - got to be free
 http://www.surfree.com




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

Ok wait a minute, I got it, must have been a network
glitch down the pipe, its back up.

Thanks

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Boles wrote:
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:42:33 -0500, Vic said:
 
  oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
   
   I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.
   
   Any *useful* information now??
 
 With an attitude like that you will find that "help' is hard to come by
 around here.
 
 If you had spent more than a few seconds looking around you might have
 found this:
 
 http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/Demo/Mandrake7.1/QuickLook/grub.
 php3
 
   
   On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
 grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.
  
you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  
   
   
   
 
 -- 
 
 David Boles
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Michael

Grub isn't anything fancy to look at (though more than lilo). A basic blue
box w/ a list of the OS's/kernels you can load. As it runs before the OS
screenshots are troublesome to get (not impossible). I think it's a little
nicer since you don't have to type in kernel names and it's easier for
non-geeks to grok.

*^*^*^*
Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
 on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
pickles at you? -- Real Genius

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Jeff Malka wrote:

 That is not very nice.  The guy was just trying to help and you bit off his
 head.
 
 Jeff Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Registered Linux user  183185
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 8:42 AM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?
 
 
  oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
 
  I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.
 
  Any *useful* information now??
 
  On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time,
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.
 
   you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  
 
 
 
 





Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

Sorry thought he was yellin at me like he did my room 
mate, I know Charley used my computer before
without asking me, and I told him about it,
changed my password and created him an account.

I asked the last flame he did to re direct it
to my room mate but he never did

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Jeff Malka wrote:
 That is not very nice.  The guy was just trying to help and you bit off his
 head.
 
 Jeff Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Registered Linux user  183185
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 8:42 AM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?
 
 
  oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
 
  I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots.
 
  Any *useful* information now??
 
  On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   In a message dated 26-Sep-00 13:44:39 Central Daylight Time,
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
Sorry for the dumb question, I am just wondering what
grub looks like and if there is a screenshot I can lookat.
 
   you can find it in the install demo at linux-mandrake.com  
 
 




Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Ronald J. Hall

"F. E. Schaper" wrote:

 I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
 that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
 Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
 approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
 television?
 
 I may have to move to Canada next year.

I agree that this is better left somewhere else...but I can't help it...I'll
never vote for a potential president whose agenda includes destroying the 2nd
amendment in order to achieve the (dubious) honor of removing firearms from
Americans!

I say again...never.

-- 
 
   /\
   DarkLord
   \/




Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Robin Regennitter

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:

yeah   I hope so,  Microcrap needs to be wipe out.  Open Source Rules!!   LOL

 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  
  Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related to
  Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But what
  I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
  
 
 --
 It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very stable and
 easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!  So, although
 it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.
 
 
 Jay
 "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your heart with 
gladness, that stays forever after."
 "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
 http://www.mrsnooky.com




Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mark Hillary

I think I will just stay in UK, we may Blair, and have no petrol (Got it at the
monent, just waiting for november when they are going to start the blockades
again) but its a nice country.

"F. E. Schaper" wrote:

 Hey Y'all,

 Before I got into using Linux I used various versions of the MAC O/S and I
 always found it to be somewhat unstable, the one thing I did like about it
 was the fact that it was not nearly as dumbed down as Windows, it is easy to
 use, but you still need to have some kind of understanding as to what the
 machine is doing. Hopefully when OS/X gets all the way (it is available in
 server packages) out they will somehow port it to run on Intel based
 processor machines, and hopefully the stability problems will be corrected,
 without having to compromise the ease of use.
 If these things happen, and the work on developing a more consumer friendly
 Linux product continues, Microsoft could be in for quite a shock.

 Of course bad news for Bill is good news for the rest of us.

 I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
 that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
 Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
 approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
 television?

 I may have to move to Canada next year.

 Fritz

 - Original Message -
 From: Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 
  Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related
 to
  Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But
 what
  I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
 

 --
 It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very stable
 and
 easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!  So,
 although
 it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.

 Jay
 "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your
 heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
 "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
 http://www.mrsnooky.com





Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Robin Regennitter

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
the only reason why Mac is different than Intel is the fact they run completely
different processors.  Mac is PPC   Intel is Pentium.

 An intel port of OS-X is never going to happen. The whole Apple vision
 depends on a consistent box to go with the OS -- in this case, a box that
 only apple makes.
 
 -- jon
 
 
 
 
  From: "F. E. Schaper" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:33:18 -0400
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
  
  Hey Y'all,
  
  Before I got into using Linux I used various versions of the MAC O/S and I
  always found it to be somewhat unstable, the one thing I did like about it
  was the fact that it was not nearly as dumbed down as Windows, it is easy to
  use, but you still need to have some kind of understanding as to what the
  machine is doing. Hopefully when OS/X gets all the way (it is available in
  server packages) out they will somehow port it to run on Intel based
  processor machines, and hopefully the stability problems will be corrected,
  without having to compromise the ease of use.
  If these things happen, and the work on developing a more consumer friendly
  Linux product continues, Microsoft could be in for quite a shock.
  
  Of course bad news for Bill is good news for the rest of us.
  
  I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
  that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
  Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
  approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
  television?
  
  I may have to move to Canada next year.
  
  Fritz
  
  
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
  
  
  On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  
  Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related
  to
  Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But
  what
  I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
  
  
  --
  It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very stable
  and
  easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!  So,
  although
  it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.
  
  
  Jay
  "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your
  heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
  "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
  http://www.mrsnooky.com
  
  
  
  
 




RE: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Robin Regennitter

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
I think you'll be surprise.

 Pardon my heresy, but I don't think Linux will make it as a viable
 alternative desktop for the masses (no offense intended)  for the following
 reasons: 
 
 1) the Linux community is too decentralized. 
 
 2) there are no such things as standards, even defacto standards - Cut 
 Paste is an example - there is not even any social pressure for developers
 to adhere to a standard.
 
 3) window managers make things too different - a nightmare for the corporate
 world, even though you're running Mandrake (or Debian, or whatever) your
 window manager makes the environment foreign to anyone that doesn't run that
 window manager.
 
 4) Linux developers work for free and are not subject to the same QA that
 Apple is subject to.
 
 5) Linux developers work for free; consequently their incentives to create
 and contribute are different
 
 6) Linux users in general would probably balk if they had to actually pay
 for software
 
 7) the average computer user is *required* to make *a lot* of effort
 understanding how to "operate" the machine.  The complexity is not
 sufficiently hidden from them when needed
 
 8) there is a certain amount of elitism within the Linux community in
 general which distains the stereotypical "aol/microsoft" user (no offense,
 just an observation)
 
 9) Linux is inherently a programmers/developers environment and
 *specifically* geared to those kinds of folks
 
 10) talk like what I'm doing here is not well received by the Linux
 community in general
 
 Again, don't get me wrong I really, really like Linux ( window managers)
 and I would really like to see it be a viable alternative desktop. But from
 my personal observations  (painful) personal experience and knowing the
 expectations  abilities of my friends  family, it's not there yet.  I
 don't expect it to be there in the next 5 to 10 years (even considering
 internet time).  I think there will need to be a broad change in perception
 among the Linux folks about the "computing world for average folks" before
 that will happen.  Unfortunately, I think Linux will have to be backwardly
 compatible with MAC and Windows - whatever that means.
 
 ps: I've just installed HelixGnome (www.helixgnome.com) and it looks really
 good though I haven't had a chance to use it yet!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 2:56 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
 
 
 On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 -- 
 Pardon my French, but who gives a s**t.  Let Microcrap do what they want. 
 Let's face it, they have had ZERO innovation since the release of Windoze
 95. 
 Each "upgrade" is basically cosmetic with a few OEM packages thrown in for
 added "benefits".  Windoze ME is worthless and not necessary.  Let them act
 how
 they want, they will get theirs in the end.  Once other OS's (Linux, the new
 OS
 X) start to take off in the desktop market, they will be forced to
 reactbut
 remember, everything Microsoft has they bought or stole from
 somebody...let's
 see 'em try to buy Linux.  I think Gates might have to look up Open-source
 in a
 dictionary.
 
 Jay
 "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your
 heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
 "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
 http://www.mrsnooky.com




Re: [newbie] Netscape browser...

2000-09-27 Per discussione Z

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 Hi, can anybody tell me how i can get colour on the netscape browsers 
 interface, it's grey and the pic's on the buttons are black...if their's 
 supposed to be colour that is. Any help would be great, thank's in advance..

Netscape icons do not show colour in 24bpp resolutionit works fine at 32
and 16 bpp, edit XF86Config and enjoyfurther, look in
here..www.photo.net/users/sp/netscape1.html

ZZZ




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Vic

Oh ok, I wonder, is there a way I can create a "rescue" disc
in case I want to replace grub with Lilo in case it does not
co-operate?

I don't think I have grub installed, as it is just some
files in /boot/grub and no install.sh file.

Do I need to install some other software to activate it?

Well, off to snoop around in the faq about grub, although
I don't think I caught anything about how to specify a
runlevel, maybe I need to snoop more or something.
many thanks


On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Michael wrote:
 Grub isn't anything fancy to look at (though more than lilo). A basic blue
 box w/ a list of the OS's/kernels you can load. As it runs before the OS
 screenshots are troublesome to get (not impossible). I think it's a little
 nicer since you don't have to type in kernel names and it's easier for
 non-geeks to grok.
 
 *^*^*^*
 Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
  on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
 pickles at you? -- Real Genius
 
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Jeff Malka wrote:





Re: [newbie] mail-client software

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mandrake

I was just at the site and the links don't work to download the software.
Am I missing something here?

Eric
Subject: Re: [newbie] mail-client software
Date: Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 05:21:11PM +0100

Time to reply!

Quoting Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Mark Weaver wrote:
 
 Jay,
 
 Where at Tucows is Mahogony? I was looking all over and couldn't find it.
 
 It is Mahogany, not Mahogony...
 
 Paul
 
 --
 When is wisdom forfeited?
 Wisdom is lost in toxic words spread by poison-mongers,
 in unthinking words spread by empty headed non thinkers,
 and by those who have the truth but do not speak it.
 -Modern Celtic Triad
 
 http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
   -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-
 
 
 




Re: [newbie] 56K MDC modem not working...

2000-09-27 Per discussione ozgur cagdas

andy...im not sure about that this modem is not a win modem. the probability 
of using system resources by this device is very high if it's onboard. on 
the other hand you have to be sure about that you have enabled your onboard 
modem from bios settings. but the best way to get specific info about your 
modem is to contact with the manufacturor. if you can't find their site, try 
finding it from www.windrivers.com. i hope you achive your goal and remove 
windows from your system FOREVER. best regards;
Ozgur.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] 56K MDC modem not working...
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:33:25 GMT


Dear all,

Please help - I am only one step away from configuring Linux (Mandrake 7.1)
and removing Windows from my machine FOREVER :)

At present I can't get Linux to recognise my modem - I am pretty sure that
it is not a Winmodem (there isn't anything anywhere that says it is a
Winmodem - the words "HSP, HCF, or DSP" do not appear at all). It is
a 56K Main-Daughter-Card clone, not a PCMCIA card, but built on the mother
board.

If I were to install the drivers under Windows the Modem will come up
under:

'? Other Devices' - '? PCI Card'

in the Device Manager and would run in COM3 (ttsy2). Yes - it was not
listed under `modems' in Windows, but under '? Other Devices'.
Although when the Windows driver was installed it magically changed to a
modem!?!

I didn't try on configure it while installing Linux. I have tried kppp
since installation and then tried to communicate with it, but it says that
the modem is busy? So I presume it is there - just doing something
- maybe a lock file somewhere?

This is all the information that I can obtain from the modem:
MODEM 56K MDC
COM 3
IRQ 5
Address D800
Manufacturer - Compact Flash Technology

The laptop is a Chicony MP-995 machine. What I can get from the manual is:
Intel BGA-1 on board uPGA-1 socket for Celeron
Intel 440MX

Any guesses / answers? Should I have configured it whilst installation - or
does this not matter?

Many thanks in advance,
Andy

--
Andy Weller
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.





Re: [newbie] ipchains and ssh

2000-09-27 Per discussione george . f . workman



Dan,

I took out the source address and I'm still not able to connect.In your
example, I assume you have a genuine
IP address in place of xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.Do you have a static IP then?

Of course, I'm also starting to wonder if I'm barking up the wrong tree
here and maybe I have something else wrong elsewhere.   Any generic ideas
on what to check to make sure ssh works?And if I can get out the server
here with
telnet, I should be able to get out with ssh also, right?

Thanks,
George



"Daniel J. Ferris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mailed by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
09/28/2000 08:58 AM CST
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: [newbie] ipchains and ssh


At 08:11 AM 9/27/00 -0500, you wrote:

Hello,

My first post on the newbie list...

I have been struggling for some time to get SSH to work on my Linux box
(2.2.13-4mdk : Mandrake 6.1).
I believe I finally have it up and running, because I am able to create a
SSH connection from/to the machine itself.

What I can't seem to manage is to make a SSH connection from an external
machine (I work in DC, Linux box is at home in OH).   I am trying using
FiSSH and I repeatedly get "Failed to Connect to Host."

Now, I do have a firewall up, and it is a pretty basic one in order to
provide IP-Masquerading (which works!), so I thought
maybe my problem was simply that the firewall wasn't letting the
connection
to port 22.  So, after extensive research I felt
that what I needed to add was a couple rules to allow the connection in,
and I tried to add something like this (and other
similar variations):

ipchains -A input -p tcp -s xxx.xxx.com -d yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 22 -j ACCEPT
ipchains -A output -p tcp -d xxx.xxx.com -d yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 22 -j ACCEPT

But it isn't working - and I think my problem lies with xxx.xxx.com and
yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy (the source and destination addresses).

1.  I don't exactly know the source IP address for where I'm at, so is it
acceptable to use xxx.xxx.com instead?
2.  I have a variable IP - so how the heck do I populate yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
with my current IP address if I don't even know it?

For #2 - I've seen some people use $IPADDR which is all well and good, but
I don't know how to populate that variable without simply hardcoding and
that just presents the same problem again.

In addition, I typed in the ipchains commands (both above) at the command
prompt and used what my IP address is currently and I still couldn't
connect to it remotely via SSH.So now my entire solution has been
undermined.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
George



I have the exact same setup as you do (almost) and ssh works from anywhere.

I just did this

ipchains -A input -p tcp -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 22 -j ACCEPT

If you are really concerned about the source address, try using the ip
address instead of the hostname/DNS name, because it may resolve to
something unexpected.

As you can see, in my example, I wasn't concerned with the source
address.  Only the destination address and port number.

Dan







Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione jon roig

You're right (technically)... The main difference, though, is that there
are a million different configurations of intel machines, and only a
handful of apple boxes...

Remember mac clones? They didn't last too long, exactly for that
reason... even now, I can't get my stupid CD-R running on my Umax
s900... while it works fine on my ancient mac 7200

-- jon


On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Robin Regennitter wrote:

 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
 the only reason why Mac is different than Intel is the fact they run completely
 different processors.  Mac is PPC   Intel is Pentium.
 
  An intel port of OS-X is never going to happen. The whole Apple vision
  depends on a consistent box to go with the OS -- in this case, a box that
  only apple makes.
  
  -- jon
  
  
  
  
   From: "F. E. Schaper" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:33:18 -0400
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
   
   Hey Y'all,
   
   Before I got into using Linux I used various versions of the MAC O/S and I
   always found it to be somewhat unstable, the one thing I did like about it
   was the fact that it was not nearly as dumbed down as Windows, it is easy to
   use, but you still need to have some kind of understanding as to what the
   machine is doing. Hopefully when OS/X gets all the way (it is available in
   server packages) out they will somehow port it to run on Intel based
   processor machines, and hopefully the stability problems will be corrected,
   without having to compromise the ease of use.
   If these things happen, and the work on developing a more consumer friendly
   Linux product continues, Microsoft could be in for quite a shock.
   
   Of course bad news for Bill is good news for the rest of us.
   
   I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
   that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
   Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
   approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
   television?
   
   I may have to move to Canada next year.
   
   Fritz
   
   
   
   
   - Original Message -
   From: Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:56 AM
   Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
   
   
   On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
   On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
   
   Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related
   to
   Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But
   what
   I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
   
   
   --
   It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very stable
   and
   easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!  So,
   although
   it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.
   
   
   Jay
   "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your
   heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
   "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
   http://www.mrsnooky.com
   
   
   
   
  
 
 





Re: [newbie] Fw: 7.1 hardware bug

2000-09-27 Per discussione Pete Smith


- Original Message - 
From: "Al Collier" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Fw: 7.1 hardware bug


 Good luck buddie, 
Gee thanks :))
Pete






[newbie] tcpd

2000-09-27 Per discussione pawel kwas

I need to use tcp wrappers. Do I need to put something in inetd.config to
have it (tcpd) enabled at boot? I can't see any entry for it there.

What is "auth" in inetd.config? What does it do? There is no manual page
for it.

Also when trying "netstat -ta" I get a table entries that show ports 6000
and 1024 (are they open?).
What's on those ports and how to close them?

thanks

Paul





Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione GAPrichard

 Microspot lead the way, now everybody is trying to do it.  -Gary-

In a message dated 9/27/2000 9:20:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 AFAIK, Mac OS-X (and thats "ten", BTW), is the classic, slick Mac GUI sitting
 on top of a version of BSD Unix. My little brother just paid $30 for a beta
 version that he is going to install on his iBook. (go figure-paying that for 
a
 beta! smile)
  




Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Patti Wavinak

Okay I have been watching this thread and I just can't resist :-) Let's all 
join forces (and I do believe that there is a sufficient number of us) and 
everyone vote (write-in ballot) for the Gov of Minnesota -- Jesse "The 
Body" Ventura giggle Trust me, no one thought he was going to win the 
governorship 2 years ago but he did just like the masses do not believe 
that Linux will be a "viable" O/S against Winblows and I guess all I can 
say is Only Time Will Tell. :-)

Patti - Registered Linux User #184611



 Original Message 

On 9/27/00, 10:28:54 AM, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
regarding Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush:


 I'd rather pick a random name from the phone book rather than vote for
 either Bush or Gore. I'll probably end up picking a name from the EFF or
 something like that. It's better to choose someone I'd really want 
knowing
 my canidate has no chance of winning than to throw my vote in behind
 someone I wouldn't trust to run my Quake server and become just another
 zombie. Does anyone have any favorites for who we should vote for as the
 Geek platform? If you wanted to get serious you might pick something like
 Richard Stallman and Eric Raymond (I probably killed their names but oh
 well.. I misspell my own name too) but I can't imagine the two of them
 working together if they could avoid it. So this election day vote for 
the
 losser. :)

 *^*^*^*
 Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
  on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
 pickles at you? -- Real Genius

 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Ronald J. Hall wrote:

  "F. E. Schaper" wrote:
 
   I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
   that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
   Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
   approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
   television?
  
   I may have to move to Canada next year.
 
  I agree that this is better left somewhere else...but I can't help 
it...I'll
  never vote for a potential president whose agenda includes destroying the 
2nd
  amendment in order to achieve the (dubious) honor of removing firearms 
from
  Americans!
 
  I say again...never.
 
  --
 
 /\
 
DarkLord
 \/
 




[newbie] Formating IDE HD

2000-09-27 Per discussione Ricardo Zevallos

Hello.

I have been trying to install Linux Mandrake in my old computer and now I
cannot create a Linux partition.

Starting form my 1.2 Gigabyte IDE-HD with Windows NT4 system, I first
deleted the ancient NT partition and 
created a new PRI-DOS partition (using fdisk).

When I tried to reformat the HD (using the DOS format command) I found that
only 4M existed !!!

I have tried using MIPS to shrink the DOS partition and create a Linux
partition (at least 1G) unsuccessfully. 
MIPS gave an error in the boot record.

Then I tried to install Linux Mandrake 7.0 from a diskette using rawwrite
but I got the "no partition available" error.

I would like advice on how to define a partition for Linux (at least 1G).

The BIOS does not allow me to boot from CD.

Thank you.




 





RE: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Richard Garand

[replies below]

Richard Garand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12190132

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Ronald J. Hall
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 10:17 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush


 "F. E. Schaper" wrote:

  I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
  that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
  Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
  approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
  television?
executing 2 womenand how many men? 200? 2000?

  I may have to move to Canada next year.
yeah





Re: [newbie] Disk Partitioning Bad parameter passed

2000-09-27 Per discussione bascule

i don't know if this will help, but at the crash try alt-f3, alt-f4 etc
and see if there are indications on the consoles what was going on at
the time

bascule

Shawn Tayler wrote:
 
 Hi Guys,
 
 Just trying out Mandrake 7.1 and I can't get past the Partition setup page during 
the install.  It always chokes while
 formating the last partition on the HD.  The error says that a bad parameter was 
passed, but not to what it was
 passed to.
 





RE: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Richard Garand

I don't really understand how the US elections work, but if you're talking
about the president, wouldn't Nader be the best of the current candidates?

Richard Garand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12190132

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 11:29 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush


 I'd rather pick a random name from the phone book rather than vote for
 either Bush or Gore. I'll probably end up picking a name from the EFF or
 something like that. It's better to choose someone I'd really want knowing
 my canidate has no chance of winning than to throw my vote in behind
 someone I wouldn't trust to run my Quake server and become just another
 zombie. Does anyone have any favorites for who we should vote for as the
 Geek platform? If you wanted to get serious you might pick something like
 Richard Stallman and Eric Raymond (I probably killed their names but oh
 well.. I misspell my own name too) but I can't imagine the two of them
 working together if they could avoid it. So this election day vote for the
 losser. :)





Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Renaud OLGIATI

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Vic wrote:
 Oh ok, I wonder, is there a way I can create a "rescue" disc
 in case I want to replace grub with Lilo in case it does not
 co-operate?

I have the opposite problem: how can I re-install GRUB ?
It came as standard with my Mandrake 7.1 install, but was replaced by LILO
when I modified my boot procedure with Drakboot.

TIA,

Ron the Frog, on the banks of the Paraguay River.
 -- 
 
 Children are natural mimic who act like their parents
despite every effort to teach them good manners.
 
  ---  http://personales.conexion.com.py/~rolgiati  ---
 




[newbie] IRQ Questions

2000-09-27 Per discussione Aaron Benedict

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

It looks like my modem although on COM2 in Windows (ttyS1) is
actually using IRQ 5 instead of IRQ 3 (which is what it should be
according to the documentation that I read). My question has two
parts. 

1. How do I check which IRQ my modem is actually using under Linux 
and
2. If it needs to be changed, how would I do this?

Thanks,
Aaron

Aaron Benedict - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: 95DB 011B A173 B613 948E  A51A 0FE4 02EB 35EF C4F4
Yahoo Messenger ID: abenedict

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBOdJ3KSXx/pF+wJ/6EQJxCQCfaVFVul1ABXehz7fpDGxJEZ+OfPEAn1/O
fz+GR90U8nx8Qtz/FcdpBsO+
=tvfn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





[newbie] aircard 210

2000-09-27 Per discussione pawel kwas

is anyone here using sierra wireless cdpd aircard 210 on linux? I got the
pcmcia-cs-3.1.14-aircard.patch for it but have no idea how to apply that
patch. please email me if you can help.
thanks

Paul





Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Michael

Dunno. I didn't even look before overwriting the included copy of Win ME
(funny name eh?) on the new server with Mandrake. Windows blows
cheese. All that'd happen is someone would rewrite lilo/grub a little to
fix it and then it'd work again. The OS can't really tell the difference.

*^*^*^*
Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
 on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
pickles at you? -- Real Genius

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, goldenpi wrote:

 Dont feel great just yet-I hear twindows millenium is going to write its boot
 code to the MBR so that it cannot be used in a duelboot. Douptless m$ has some
 exuse-probably say its to combat virus that write to the boot record even
 through there 10 yeard old.
 
 Oppinions of my new sig? I hope it comes through.
 
 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  Hey Y'all,
  
  Before I got into using Linux I used various versions of the MAC O/S and I
  always found it to be somewhat unstable, the one thing I did like about it
  was the fact that it was not nearly as dumbed down as Windows, it is easy to
  use, but you still need to have some kind of understanding as to what the
  machine is doing. Hopefully when OS/X gets all the way (it is available in
  server packages) out they will somehow port it to run on Intel based
  processor machines, and hopefully the stability problems will be corrected,
  without having to compromise the ease of use.
  If these things happen, and the work on developing a more consumer friendly
  Linux product continues, Microsoft could be in for quite a shock.
  
  Of course bad news for Bill is good news for the rest of us.
  
  I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
  that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
  Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
  approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
  television?
  
  I may have to move to Canada next year.
  
  Fritz
  
  
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
  
  
  On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
   On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  
   Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related
  to
   Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But
  what
   I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
  
  
  --
  It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very stable
  and
  easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!  So,
  although
  it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.
  
  
  Jay
  "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill your
  heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
  "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
  http://www.mrsnooky.com
 -- 
 ==
 Goldenpi- programer, unreal level creator, linux user and all round geek.
 If you are reading this, I sent this mail from linux.
 





Re: [newbie] OpenGL

2000-09-27 Per discussione Larry Hignight

Well it kind of depends.  OpenGL is a graphics library and I seriously
doubt that there is an OpenGL rpm on your system.  Try rpm -qa | grep
opengl.  The missing OpenGL support that the game is refering has to do
with your graphics card drivers.  So the question becomes what kind of
graphics card are you using and does it support OpenGL.  A OpenGL rpm
would be something developers would use in order to create graphic
images, etc.  

Larry

-- 
Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta Tester  Caldera Linux 2.4

  5:10pm  up 2 days, 21:06,  4 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.12, 0.08


KompuKit wrote:
 
 I have a Pentium 233 MMX 64 mg ram
 a S3 video card Rev 1.0 drivers (in windows)
 
 I'm trying to install a game: Search and Rescue for Linux
 helicopter game that requires OpenGL...
 it won't compile...unless it's on my system...
 I have Mandrake 7.02...does this come on the CD?
 if so, what's the RPM called...
 --
  Registered Linux User:167369
 =KompuKit=
 Kit Goins   ICQ# 7110071
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lowell, Mass.
 Web Designerhttp://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
 WebServer:  http://kompukit.dyndns.org
 (Server Runs between M - F 6pm-12am, S  S 12pm-12am EST)
 =KompuKit=




Re: [newbie] DSL

2000-09-27 Per discussione Robert Scripter

Steve Dressler wrote:
 
   I have 2 win98 machines, and networked with ADSL going to both computers,
 I also have a IBM Server 320 with mandrake 7.1 installed on it.  How much
 trouble is it to connect it to the network so I can have DSL going to it?
 
   Sorry if this has been topic before.

If your DSL is connected to one of the Win98 machines, you could use a
program called NAT32 - http://www.nat32.com - that will easily connect
all machines through one.  I use it right now and it is awesome.  I
highly recommend it.

Rob Scripter




Re: [newbie] Geforce 2 driver

2000-09-27 Per discussione Larry Hignight

Maybe because you have a Gforce 1 and not a 2 (as the original poster
asked about).  

Duh!  

Why don't you read some of the faq's I pointed out in the previous
post.  It might help you out a bit.  I'm also going to assume that your
XF86Config file refers to a 'nv' driver and not the newer 'nvidia'
driver.  

Larry

markOpoleO wrote:
 
 Ok so explain to me why MD 7.1 detected my video card a Geforce 1...duh.
 LOL
 
 markOpoleO
 - Original Message -
 From: "Larry Hignight" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 9:57 PM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Geforce 2 driver
 
  MarkO,
 
  Well that's kind of funny.  Because if you go to the supported hardware
  section of the linux-mandrake web site there is a link to instructions
  that are awfully similar to the ones I posted below.  But just to be
  sure.  I ran over and checked the Linux Drivers page ... funny thing.
  Requirement 2.1 says that Nvidia drivers require XFree4.01 to work.
  Directly above that it says that the Riva and NV1 chips are supported
  under XFree4.0 ... not Gforce 1 and 2.  Which would probably explains
  some of the threads we get around here about once or twice a month
  bitching about installing XFree4.01.  If you don't believe me go to
  irc.openprojects.net channel #loki and ask jlundy if nvidia drivers are
  supported by Mandrake 7.1  he works in the driver dept. at Nvidia so
  I think he should know.
 
  Larry
 
  markOpoleO wrote:
  
   What are you talking about?!  MD 7.1 Supports Geforce 2 and 1 cards
 right
   during install.
   You can allways upgrade to 4.1.0 if you want..
  
   markOpoleO
   - Original Message -
   From: "Larry Hignight" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 7:46 PM
   Subject: Re: [newbie] Geforce 2 driver
  
Dominus Paparum wrote:

 quick question before I install LM, does it come with drivers for
 the
   geforce2? i can download them from nvidia how do i install these
 drivers?
   the file extention is .rpm what do i do with it?

 
 Get Email, News, Links and The Best Selection at
 http://AnimeNation.com
   
Dominus,
   
First, do us all a favor and set your email client to wrap outgoing
messages at 72 characters or less.  Thanks.  If your new to Linux and
not comfortable working from a command line then forget about it for
right now.  I don't think any distro currently has support for Nvidia
"built in".  That may have already changed with the release Red Hat 7
though.  I'm sure Mandrake 7.2 will also support Nvidia cards out of
 the
box.  If you still feel up for a project here is what I did in a
nutshell to get my Gforce working.
   
A.  Your gonna have to upgrade to XFree4.01
.5  Almost forgot ... mv /etx/X11 and /usr/X11 to /etc/X11-old and
/usr/X11-old
1.  goto www.xfree86.org and download Xinstall.sh and extract
2.  take a look at the readme files while your there
3.  run 'sh Xinstall.sh' then download the correct binaries
4.  install the binaries
5.  run /usr/X11/bin/xf86config ... be sure to have your monitor
 manual
handy
   
B.  Install the Nvidia drivers
1.  Install the both rpm's ... no sweat here.  I had to --nodeps one
 of
them.
   
C.  Tweak XF86Config
1.  Refer to the faq at Nvidia under linux drivers
2.  I recall having to uncomment the glx line under modules
3.  Had to change the driver from nv to nvidia
   
voila ... your done for now.  I'm just leaving my machine on inittab 3
for now.  Whenever I want to play a game I simply 'startx' and run the
game from inside of twm which seems to be more stable then before I
 had
a Nvidia card.  Incedently, I'm also getting fairly significantly
 higher
frame rates under this setting then under WinME.
   
--
Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta tester  Caldera Linux
 2.4
  
  
 12:45am  up 1 day,  8:49,  5 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
  
  
   
 
  --
  Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta tester  Caldera Linux 2.4
  
   12:45am  up 1 day,  8:49,  5 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
  
 

-- 
Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta Tester  Caldera Linux 2.4

  5:15pm  up 2 days, 21:11,  4 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.07





RE: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Michael

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Pardon my heresy, but I don't think Linux will make it as a viable
  alternative desktop for the masses (no offense intended)  for the
 following
  reasons:
 
  1) the Linux community is too decentralized.
 
 This one I can agree on  ;-)

One of it's strongest points. What is decentralized is hard to stop. At
the same time the community backs it's leaders almost completely. If Linus
makes a choice the people will follow him because he is a smart leader. If
he is proven wrong he will admit it and go with the new way and give
credit where credit is due. This is one reason Linux is so
successful. Very decentralized but with strong vortexes of leadership. If
you don't like what the leader decides then your free to do your own
thing. If you prove them wrong then they usually will recognize your
proof.

  2) there are no such things as standards, even defacto standards - Cut 
  Paste is an example - there is not even any social pressure for
 developers
  to adhere to a standard.
 
 I think what you are refering to is there are no "cattle" developers.
 Standards are only standards if everyone follows them .. who's to say my
 standard is the right one. In the same respect that MS or APPLE follow
 standards so does linux ... but Linux goes one better ... name and prove
 ANY other operating system that actually follows the RFC's for its tcp /
 udp stack. No time to get into ALL the *relevant* standards that ARE
 followed .. this is just one example.
 

Anyone who thinks there are no standards obviously haven't followed
Linux. It all began based on public standards. A free version of those
standards. Where there were not yet standards new standards have been made
and submitted to the proper authorities as new standards. I have used
pretty much every WM for X and it's been a steady progression. KDE  Gnome
have both comitted themselves to standardizing cutpaste, dragdrop, etc
and are working towards making their components work across both. Jabber
has created one of the best references for XML in a real-world product and
they are setting the standard for interdevice communication and instant
messages. PHP and Perl are open specs that anyone can add to or make their
own version of. Both have completely been rewritten at least once to make
room for better versions.

  3) window managers make things too different - a nightmare for the
 corporate
  world, even though you're running Mandrake (or Debian, or whatever) your
  window manager makes the environment foreign to anyone that doesn't run
 that
  window manager.
  
 As a person in the corperate environment, I can also agree with this ... at
 the very low user level. Linux is Linux thats it  its applications that
 people are confusing with the actual operating system ... if you are in an
 X session and alt to a console it doesn't make ANY difference what window
 manager you are using ... its all command line anyway ...  lest we forget
 this is UNIX  maybe its time to teach more people right from the get go
 that the little pretty pictures aren't what make an Operating system.

If your company doesn't want to support more than one WM then don't. If
you do it isn't that hard to do, I know because I do it, and each user can
set their own prefs. Using NFS/NIS users only have to set things up once
and it is shared across all the machines they have access to. Windows and
MacOS can't even begin to touch that without a lot of weird voodoo.

  4) Linux developers work for free and are not subject to the same QA that
  Apple is subject to.
 
 
 WAY off on this one. As a developer working on an open project you are
 slammed harder than anyone else to make something that exceeds
 expectations... you think people who pay for things can be demanding 
 try coding for free LOL and not only offer it for free...but give people
 the means to contact you PERSONALLY so they can reach you whenever they
 want.  Its an awsome and exciting thing ... if you code because you love it
 ... not *just* because it feeds you plus its not just an installed base of
 10 people who you had to sell your software to  becasue its free 10's
 of thousands of people (including smarter coders) will be sending you
 *feedback* before you know it, if there are ANY problems they are usually
 pointed out pretty quickly. This is the only real way to get the QA
 corperations make it LOOK like they have. (isolated testing by a team or
 teams who punch a clock) In the same respect this is how projects are
 guaged to live and prosper of die off.  I guess for some it is pretty hard
 to comprehend loving something so much you would spend all your free time
 working on it with the only goal being to make it better than everyone
 elses  especially when you give it away for free.

Right on. As a sysadmin I can say I dread when I have to use commercial
software. It is buggier, harder to setup, and has much stricter
requirements than opensource software. As a 

[newbie] Another Mandrake review

2000-09-27 Per discussione Carroll Grigsby

CNET posted a review of Mandrake 7.1 this week - favorable but nothing
substantial. It's at linux.cnet.com/linux. The high point (for me, at
least) was the ad for RedHat 6.2. That's ok -- the same ad shows up on
the RedHat 7.0 review. They say the RH 7.0 file is 1 gb -- I think I'll
pass.
-- cmg




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Barry Premeaux

Vic wrote:

 Oh ok, I wonder, is there a way I can create a "rescue" disc
 in case I want to replace grub with Lilo in case it does not
 co-operate?

 I don't think I have grub installed, as it is just some
 files in /boot/grub and no install.sh file.

 Do I need to install some other software to activate it?

 Well, off to snoop around in the faq about grub, although
 I don't think I caught anything about how to specify a
 runlevel, maybe I need to snoop more or something.
 many thanks


Changing your default log in is done in /etc/inittab.  To change
from the text log in to graphical, you would change the line:

id:3:initdefault
to
id:5:initdefault

Since I don't trust my memory, I went back to the newbie archives
to get the info.  You will also find references on how to move from
LILO to GRUB and back again.   Mandrake installed GRUB
automatically for me, and I have been happy with it.  Since I'm
running only one OS, I haven't had a reason to fiddle with it.
Making changes is rather straight forward though.   You simply
need to edit the menu.lst file.  There are numerous examples
on how it should look.

Enjoy.


--
Barry :-)

Registered Linux User #183879







Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Michael

Where does he stand on IP ownership issues etc?

*^*^*^*
Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
 on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
pickles at you? -- Real Genius

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Patti Wavinak wrote:

 Okay I have been watching this thread and I just can't resist :-) Let's all 
 join forces (and I do believe that there is a sufficient number of us) and 
 everyone vote (write-in ballot) for the Gov of Minnesota -- Jesse "The 
 Body" Ventura giggle Trust me, no one thought he was going to win the 
 governorship 2 years ago but he did just like the masses do not believe 
 that Linux will be a "viable" O/S against Winblows and I guess all I can 
 say is Only Time Will Tell. :-)
 
 Patti - Registered Linux User #184611
 
 
 
  Original Message 
 
 On 9/27/00, 10:28:54 AM, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
 regarding Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush:
 
 
  I'd rather pick a random name from the phone book rather than vote for
  either Bush or Gore. I'll probably end up picking a name from the EFF or
  something like that. It's better to choose someone I'd really want 
 knowing
  my canidate has no chance of winning than to throw my vote in behind
  someone I wouldn't trust to run my Quake server and become just another
  zombie. Does anyone have any favorites for who we should vote for as the
  Geek platform? If you wanted to get serious you might pick something like
  Richard Stallman and Eric Raymond (I probably killed their names but oh
  well.. I misspell my own name too) but I can't imagine the two of them
  working together if they could avoid it. So this election day vote for 
 the
  losser. :)
 
  *^*^*^*
  Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
   on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
  pickles at you? -- Real Genius
 
  On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 
   "F. E. Schaper" wrote:
  
I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
television?
   
I may have to move to Canada next year.
  
   I agree that this is better left somewhere else...but I can't help 
 it...I'll
   never vote for a potential president whose agenda includes destroying the 
 2nd
   amendment in order to achieve the (dubious) honor of removing firearms 
 from
   Americans!
  
   I say again...never.
  
   --
  
  /\
  
 DarkLord
  \/
  
 





RE: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mike Tracy Holt



"F. E. Schaper" wrote:

 I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I think
 that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
 Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
 approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on national
 television?

 I may have to move to Canada next year.

I agree that this is better left somewhere else...but I can't help
it...I'll
never vote for a potential president whose agenda includes
destroying the 2nd
amendment in order to achieve the (dubious) honor of removing firearms from
Americans!

I say again...never.

--



/\

DarkLord

How about a potential president who claims to have invented the internet???
An 'A' for originality?

Mike





Re: [newbie] 3D Prophet II GTS 32 MB

2000-09-27 Per discussione markOpoleO

I have a 3d Prophet Geforce 1 DDR, it should detect it automaticlly during
install.

markOpoleO

- Original Message -
From: "James Boeck" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:02 PM
Subject: [newbie] 3D Prophet II GTS 32 MB


 I just bought a new graphics card the 3D Prophet II GTS 32 MB, does anyone
 know of any drivers or way to get this card to install in Mandrake Linux
 7.1.  I currently have a Matrox Millenium II in the machine so it will
still
 operate but it would be nice to use a decent graphics card.  Nvidia's
 drivers only cover Geforce One's and they mention the 2nd edition but does
 not give instructions on how to install them?  Any help would be
 appreciated.
 James Boeck
 _
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

 Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
 http://profiles.msn.com.







Re: [newbie] Geforce 2 driver

2000-09-27 Per discussione markOpoleO

Mandrake 7.1 uses the same drivers for Geforce 1 and 2...it is just the same
Nvidea drivers..DUH.

markOpoleO
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hignight" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Geforce 2 driver


 Maybe because you have a Gforce 1 and not a 2 (as the original poster
 asked about).

 Duh!

 Why don't you read some of the faq's I pointed out in the previous
 post.  It might help you out a bit.  I'm also going to assume that your
 XF86Config file refers to a 'nv' driver and not the newer 'nvidia'
 driver.

 Larry

 markOpoleO wrote:
 
  Ok so explain to me why MD 7.1 detected my video card a Geforce 1...duh.
  LOL
 
  markOpoleO
  - Original Message -
  From: "Larry Hignight" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 9:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Geforce 2 driver
 
   MarkO,
  
   Well that's kind of funny.  Because if you go to the supported
hardware
   section of the linux-mandrake web site there is a link to instructions
   that are awfully similar to the ones I posted below.  But just to be
   sure.  I ran over and checked the Linux Drivers page ... funny thing.
   Requirement 2.1 says that Nvidia drivers require XFree4.01 to work.
   Directly above that it says that the Riva and NV1 chips are supported
   under XFree4.0 ... not Gforce 1 and 2.  Which would probably explains
   some of the threads we get around here about once or twice a month
   bitching about installing XFree4.01.  If you don't believe me go to
   irc.openprojects.net channel #loki and ask jlundy if nvidia drivers
are
   supported by Mandrake 7.1  he works in the driver dept. at Nvidia
so
   I think he should know.
  
   Larry
  
   markOpoleO wrote:
   
What are you talking about?!  MD 7.1 Supports Geforce 2 and 1 cards
  right
during install.
You can allways upgrade to 4.1.0 if you want..
   
markOpoleO
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hignight" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Geforce 2 driver
   
 Dominus Paparum wrote:
 
  quick question before I install LM, does it come with drivers
for
  the
geforce2? i can download them from nvidia how do i install these
  drivers?
the file extention is .rpm what do i do with it?
 
  
  Get Email, News, Links and The Best Selection at
  http://AnimeNation.com

 Dominus,

 First, do us all a favor and set your email client to wrap
outgoing
 messages at 72 characters or less.  Thanks.  If your new to Linux
and
 not comfortable working from a command line then forget about it
for
 right now.  I don't think any distro currently has support for
Nvidia
 "built in".  That may have already changed with the release Red
Hat 7
 though.  I'm sure Mandrake 7.2 will also support Nvidia cards out
of
  the
 box.  If you still feel up for a project here is what I did in a
 nutshell to get my Gforce working.

 A.  Your gonna have to upgrade to XFree4.01
 .5  Almost forgot ... mv /etx/X11 and /usr/X11 to /etc/X11-old and
 /usr/X11-old
 1.  goto www.xfree86.org and download Xinstall.sh and extract
 2.  take a look at the readme files while your there
 3.  run 'sh Xinstall.sh' then download the correct binaries
 4.  install the binaries
 5.  run /usr/X11/bin/xf86config ... be sure to have your monitor
  manual
 handy

 B.  Install the Nvidia drivers
 1.  Install the both rpm's ... no sweat here.  I had to --nodeps
one
  of
 them.

 C.  Tweak XF86Config
 1.  Refer to the faq at Nvidia under linux drivers
 2.  I recall having to uncomment the glx line under modules
 3.  Had to change the driver from nv to nvidia

 voila ... your done for now.  I'm just leaving my machine on
inittab 3
 for now.  Whenever I want to play a game I simply 'startx' and run
the
 game from inside of twm which seems to be more stable then before
I
  had
 a Nvidia card.  Incedently, I'm also getting fairly significantly
  higher
 frame rates under this setting then under WinME.

 --
 Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta tester  Caldera
Linux
  2.4
   
 
 
  12:45am  up 1 day,  8:49,  5 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.03,
0.00
   
 
 

  
   --
   Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta tester  Caldera Linux
2.4
 
 
12:45am  up 1 day,  8:49,  5 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
 
 
  

 --
 Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta 

[newbie] Console error's?

2000-09-27 Per discussione charlsplant

Hello! estimados amigos de newbie(dear friends)
I'm having some problems installing "acroreader405.tar" and this is the
situation if I go by the book "LM7.0 Getting Started Manual" I'd try :
tar xvf  linux -ar-405.tar.gz -the answer is :"tar old option "f "
requires an argument - try :tar --help for more info"
According to MUO'S how to " Installing Non-RPm programs" the example they
used is "acrobat reader405" the same that I have. following the steps to 
unpack the archive I wrote:
 tar xzf linux-ar-40.tar.gz " .Console answer.."tar {child}:cannot open
archive linux' ' ' '  No such file or dir.." tar {child} :error is not
recoverable :exiting now  " 
and the story goes on.. even if I type " tar vzxf " commands (according
to Flupke) but the results are the same. the cdrom works okay ,but not
the command line..
What I have is LM7.0 -Complete" running (along) in 13.6 gig Maxtor
-CyrixInstead 6x86MX  64RAM .233 Mh. Can you tell  me what is the
problem? I'm fighting this for 3 months .
In advance let me thank you for your patient and your kindness.
Blessings.
Carlos




RE: [newbie] Another Mandrake review

2000-09-27 Per discussione Richard Garand

The mandrake 2-CD install was 1GB for mebut then i got the iso images
for the full CDs. If you download the ~700-2000 seperate packages you want,
it's probably a bit smaller.

Richard Garand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 12190132

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carroll
 Grigsby
 Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:45 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [newbie] Another Mandrake review


 CNET posted a review of Mandrake 7.1 this week - favorable but nothing
 substantial. It's at linux.cnet.com/linux. The high point (for me, at
 least) was the ad for RedHat 6.2. That's ok -- the same ad shows up on
 the RedHat 7.0 review. They say the RH 7.0 file is 1 gb -- I think I'll
 pass.
 -- cmg







RE: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Tyler Longren

I'm dual booting WinME and Mandrake right now.  I haven't payed much
attention to this thread.  I just saw something about dual booting
Mandrake and WinME.  If you have 2 hard drives, it's easy.  Put ME on
one, and Mandrake on the other.  Set the Linux drive to master, and
you're set.  If you have one hard drive, just install Mandrake AFTER
windows.

Tyler

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 5:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush


Dunno. I didn't even look before overwriting the included copy of Win ME
(funny name eh?) on the new server with Mandrake. Windows blows
cheese. All that'd happen is someone would rewrite lilo/grub a little to
fix it and then it'd work again. The OS can't really tell the
difference.

*^*^*^*
Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
 on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
pickles at you? -- Real Genius

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, goldenpi wrote:

 Dont feel great just yet-I hear twindows millenium is going to write
its boot
 code to the MBR so that it cannot be used in a duelboot. Douptless m$
has some
 exuse-probably say its to combat virus that write to the boot record
even
 through there 10 yeard old.

 Oppinions of my new sig? I hope it comes through.

 On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  Hey Y'all,
 
  Before I got into using Linux I used various versions of the MAC O/S
and I
  always found it to be somewhat unstable, the one thing I did like
about it
  was the fact that it was not nearly as dumbed down as Windows, it is
easy to
  use, but you still need to have some kind of understanding as to
what the
  machine is doing. Hopefully when OS/X gets all the way (it is
available in
  server packages) out they will somehow port it to run on Intel based
  processor machines, and hopefully the stability problems will be
corrected,
  without having to compromise the ease of use.
  If these things happen, and the work on developing a more consumer
friendly
  Linux product continues, Microsoft could be in for quite a shock.
 
  Of course bad news for Bill is good news for the rest of us.
 
  I'll leave the Presidential debate open for others to discuss as I
think
  that is too far off topic for this list, but I will ask you this:
  Do you want a President who, up until this point is most famous for
  approving the execution of 2 women, and for picking his nose on
national
  television?
 
  I may have to move to Canada next year.
 
  Fritz
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush
 
 
  On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
   On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, you wrote:
  
   Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not
related
  to
   Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.
But
  what
   I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled
OSX.
  
 
  --
  It is Mac.  But OS X is based on Unix.  The buzz is that it is very
stable
  and
  easy to use.  If Mac makes the OS X Intel compatible, watch out!
So,
  although
  it is not Linux, OS X is a perceived threat to Windoze.
 
 
  Jay
  "May the sound of happy music, And the lilt of Irish laughter, fill
your
  heart with gladness, that stays forever after."
  "May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend."
  http://www.mrsnooky.com
 --
 ==
 Goldenpi- programer, unreal level creator, linux user and all round
geek.
 If you are reading this, I sent this mail from linux.







Re: [newbie] When an X app fails how do I view error messages?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Anthony

Open up an xterm (or equivlant) and type in the name of the program that is
giving you problems. it'll give you error feedback. 

 When an X application running under GNOME fails, where do the error
 messages go,
 and how can I trap for them.  I am running Mandrake 7.1 with a  GUI
 login...
 Something's broke, and I am not sure how to view the messages.
-- 
Anthony
http://binaryfusion.net
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are. 




Re: [newbie] Formating IDE HD

2000-09-27 Per discussione Larry Hignight

Don't you just love fs support by MS?!  

Well, I can't see any reason for not wanting to flash the bios,
especially, if it will add something as convenient as a bootable
cd-rom.  Short of that maybe you can get a hold of a partition magic
floppy?  If you have another Linux machine maybe you could make a
bootable floppy disk with the Linux version fdisk?

Larry

Ricardo Zevallos wrote:
 
 Hello.
 
 I have been trying to install Linux Mandrake in my old computer and now I
 cannot create a Linux partition.
 
 Starting form my 1.2 Gigabyte IDE-HD with Windows NT4 system, I first
 deleted the ancient NT partition and
 created a new PRI-DOS partition (using fdisk).
 
 When I tried to reformat the HD (using the DOS format command) I found that
 only 4M existed !!!
 
 I have tried using MIPS to shrink the DOS partition and create a Linux
 partition (at least 1G) unsuccessfully.
 MIPS gave an error in the boot record.
 
 Then I tried to install Linux Mandrake 7.0 from a diskette using rawwrite
 but I got the "no partition available" error.
 
 I would like advice on how to define a partition for Linux (at least 1G).
 
 The BIOS does not allow me to boot from CD.
 
 Thank you.
 
 

-- 
Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta Tester  Caldera Linux 2.4

  7:00pm  up 2 days, 22:56,  4 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.05, 0.01





Re: [newbie] OpenGL

2000-09-27 Per discussione KompuKit

I thought I answered your question in my first email

Larry Hignight wrote:
 
 Well it kind of depends.  OpenGL is a graphics library and I seriously
 doubt that there is an OpenGL rpm on your system.  Try rpm -qa | grep
 opengl.  The missing OpenGL support that the game is refering has to do
 with your graphics card drivers.  So the question becomes what kind of
 graphics card are you using and does it support OpenGL.  A OpenGL rpm
 would be something developers would use in order to create graphic
 images, etc.
 
 Larry
 
 --
 Larry Hignight  Descent 3 Beta Tester  Caldera Linux 2.4
 
   5:10pm  up 2 days, 21:06,  4 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.12, 0.08
 
 
 KompuKit wrote:
 
  I have a Pentium 233 MMX 64 mg ram
  a S3 video card Rev 1.0 drivers (in windows)
 
  I'm trying to install a game: Search and Rescue for Linux
  helicopter game that requires OpenGL...
  it won't compile...unless it's on my system...
  I have Mandrake 7.02...does this come on the CD?
  if so, what's the RPM called...
  --
   Registered Linux User:167369
  =KompuKit=
  Kit Goins   ICQ# 7110071
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lowell, Mass.
  Web Designerhttp://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
  WebServer:  http://kompukit.dyndns.org
  (Server Runs between M - F 6pm-12am, S  S 12pm-12am EST)
  =KompuKit=

-- 
 Registered Linux User:167369
=KompuKit=
Kit Goins   ICQ# 7110071
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lowell, Mass.
Web Designerhttp://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
WebServer:  http://kompukit.dyndns.org
(Server Runs between M - F 6pm-12am, S  S 12pm-12am EST)
=KompuKit=




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Paul

2000-09-27. Incoming bitstream from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Vic wrote:
 Oh ok, I wonder, is there a way I can create a "rescue" disc
 in case I want to replace grub with Lilo in case it does not
 co-operate?

I have the opposite problem: how can I re-install GRUB ?
It came as standard with my Mandrake 7.1 install, but was replaced by LILO
when I modified my boot procedure with Drakboot.

Just run /boot/grub/install.sh as root and Grub is back in town :)

Paul

--
I am not in denial.
I'm just really picky about the reality I accept.

http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
  -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-





Re: [newbie] mail-client software

2000-09-27 Per discussione Paul

2000-09-27. Incoming bitstream from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I was just at the site and the links don't work to download the software.
Am I missing something here?

Eric
   Subject: Re: [newbie] mail-client software
   Date: Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 05:21:11PM +0100
 
 Where at Tucows is Mahogony? I was looking all over and couldn't find it.
 
 It is Mahogany, not Mahogony...

Search for Mahogany at www.google.com that will get you to their
webpage. If that doesn't work I am clueless...

Paul

--
I am not in denial.
I'm just really picky about the reality I accept.

http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
  -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-





[newbie] Brand new, and full of questions

2000-09-27 Per discussione Ralph Avery

I am completely new to Linux, and thoroughly confused, so please forgive my
naivete.

My system:

Video:ATI Rage/RageII PCI (ati_m64)
Sound:   VIA PCI Audio Controller (Onboard)
Modem: 5634BTS 56K Video Ready Modem (Hardware) Manuf: Texas Inst.
LAN: Linksys LNEPCI II PCI Ethernet Adapter
MB:   VIA EPox EP-7KXA
PRO:AMD Athlon Slot-A 650 MHz
RAM:128 PC-100 SDRAM
HD1: 20GB Maxtor
HD2: 15GB WD


First Question:

I recently tried to install Linux-Mandrake 6.5 or 6.2 (Whichever the case
may be, the cover says both) I already have Win 98, Win 2K, and Win NT on
this computer, so I bought another hard drive for Linux.  I used Partition
commander to create a Linux partition on the second hard drive (Both a
regular linux partition, and a swap partition).  I installed it according to
the rules, but LILO won't install.  I can boot it from the boot disk that I
created, but I can't boot it otherwise.  I tried to read up on it in the
manual, but that's in a different language.

Second question:

I booted Linux with the boot disk, and the GUI takes up more than my screen.
I can go to the right, left, up, or down with the mouse and it will follow
it, but it really seems strange.  Is this normal?





Re: [newbie] Console error's?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Adam

possibly try

tar -xzf linux-ar-40.tar.gz

that's how i've always done it
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 10:22 PM
Subject: [newbie] Console error's?


 Hello! estimados amigos de newbie(dear friends)
 I'm having some problems installing "acroreader405.tar" and this is the
 situation if I go by the book "LM7.0 Getting Started Manual" I'd try :
 tar xvf  linux -ar-405.tar.gz -the answer is :"tar old option "f "
 requires an argument - try :tar --help for more info"
 According to MUO'S how to " Installing Non-RPm programs" the example they
 used is "acrobat reader405" the same that I have. following the steps to 
 unpack the archive I wrote:
  tar xzf linux-ar-40.tar.gz " .Console answer.."tar {child}:cannot open
 archive linux' ' ' '  No such file or dir.." tar {child} :error is not
 recoverable :exiting now  " 
 and the story goes on.. even if I type " tar vzxf " commands (according
 to Flupke) but the results are the same. the cdrom works okay ,but not
 the command line..
 What I have is LM7.0 -Complete" running (along) in 13.6 gig Maxtor
 -CyrixInstead 6x86MX  64RAM .233 Mh. Can you tell  me what is the
 problem? I'm fighting this for 3 months .
 In advance let me thank you for your patient and your kindness.
 Blessings.
 Carlos
 
 
 
 





Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mwinold

yes macintosh is developing a system based on the linux/unix os, mirosoft 
helped a little ofcourse, but the new os looks promissing however stability 
of our precious kernel was sacraficed a little infact during the demo that 
steve jobs played, cant remember where off hand but one of the programs 
stalled however it did not bring down the whole os and was easily exited, you 
can find the article somewhere on abc.com




In a message dated 27-Sep-00 03:10:03 Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Isnt OSX a MAC versions of Operating System.  I thought it's not related to
 Linux.   Of course there are some Linux distributions for the Mac.  But what
 I've heard Apple is producing the next generation of O/S entitled OSX.
 
 Rob 




Re: [newbie] any screenshots of grub?

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mwinold

i think your blind next time read it pointed strait to it and only took me a 
minute to find it but here is the site

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/Demo/Mandrake7.1/QuickLook/grub.php3

enjoy


In a message dated 27-Sep-00 07:43:53 Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 oh gee that was phreakin helpful thanks for nothing.
 
 I loooked there and already found nothing but kde screenshots. 




Re: [newbie] off-topic (webring-app)

2000-09-27 Per discussione jon roig

I think I've seen some over at http://www.cgi-resources.com

(damn... startin' to feel like an ad for those guys)
-- jon

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, KompuKit wrote:

 Can someone tell me where I can get an APP or cgi-script
 of some sort..to HOST a WEBRING...on my server?
 
 FREE, of course
 





Re: [newbie] off-topic (webring-app)

2000-09-27 Per discussione Brian King

Try http://hotscripts.com

KompuKit wrote:

 Can someone tell me where I can get an APP or cgi-script
 of some sort..to HOST a WEBRING...on my server?

 FREE, of course
 --
  Registered Linux User:167369
 =KompuKit=
 Kit Goins   ICQ# 7110071
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lowell, Mass.
 Web Designerhttp://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
 WebServer:  http://kompukit.dyndns.org
 (Server Runs between M - F 6pm-12am, S  S 12pm-12am EST)
 =KompuKit=





Re: [newbie] Space problem - help!

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mwinold

heres a thought im running out of space myself and i dont have room on my 
laptop to install a 40gb hard drive. any suggestions??



In a message dated 27-Sep-00 12:01:36 Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Buy a second hdd? That's what I do. I see 40Gb'ers selling for $135 these
 days. Move your /home files there and reinstall Mandrake. You can try
 resizing but it's usually easier and safer just to add space. Also you
 might look to see if you have any non-programs in that partition (mp3's
 ec) and move them to /home. 




Re: [newbie] Microsoft and George W. Bush

2000-09-27 Per discussione Mwinold

research by some university shows that statistically linux is the second most 
popular os in the world, #1 is still winblows however there are many benifits 
in the linux community you have thousands of developers who find a bug post 
it and instantly thousands of others begin working on the problem and post a 
solution within record time!!, you can find that on one of the many linux 
news sites accompanying bill gates comment about linux!
i feel linux has potential given i am a dead beat basic programmer (cringes 
at the thought of microsoft programming) but from what i have seen of linux 
mainly mandrake proven #1 in usability and richness in features there can be 
an obtainable goal of uniformity soon grub, sawmill, kde and other guis will 
merely be a skin, i particularly like kde but thats only because it looks 
better and currently on my system is more stable, we have seen many 
advancements in the linux world as well, (ie microprogramming, qnx, trinux, 
the number one triumph of all started in the beginning stability)

the linux community can band together but it may take a little bit of effort 
we have many companys working together and more joining every day but i will 
give you that it is hard and everyone has their own ideas, who knows we may 
have a programmer who is analyizing every bit of code out there for linux and 
is secretly creating the ultimate linux os in his basement, the box for every 
user!!! 

i want to be that person but i have much to learn!




RE: [newbie] Brand new, and full of questions

2000-09-27 Per discussione Seth

welcome to the club!

First Question:

I recently tried to install Linux-Mandrake 6.5 or 6.2 (Whichever the
case
may be, the cover says both) I already have Win 98, Win 2K, and Win
NT on
this computer, so I bought another hard drive for Linux.  I used
Partition
commander to create a Linux partition on the second hard drive (Both
a
regular linux partition, and a swap partition).  I installed it
according to
the rules, but LILO won't install.  I can boot it from the boot disk
that I
created, but I can't boot it otherwise.  I tried to read up on it in
the
manual, but that's in a different language.

are you sure lilo is installed on your MBR? this is probably on
your windows drive I know it's scary to overwrite it but anything
can be fixed



Second question:

I booted Linux with the boot disk, and the GUI takes up more than my
screen.
I can go to the right, left, up, or down with the mouse and it will
follow
it, but it really seems strange.  Is this normal?

...this is normal it's a type of virtual desktop, it's annoying
for most but some like the extra desktop space it gives them.
Unfortunately I can't remember what to do to get rid of it, I think
you have to edit your xf86config file.
have you considered upgrading to mandrake 7.1? It is amazingly
better

good luck!

seth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...





Re: [newbie] Brand new, and full of questions

2000-09-27 Per discussione Alan Shoemaker

Ralph Avery wrote:
[snip] 
 First Question:
 
 I recently tried to install Linux-Mandrake 6.5 or 6.2 (Whichever the case
 may be, the cover says both) I already have Win 98, Win 2K, and Win NT on
 this computer, so I bought another hard drive for Linux.  I used Partition
 commander to create a Linux partition on the second hard drive (Both a
 regular linux partition, and a swap partition).  I installed it according to
 the rules, but LILO won't install.  I can boot it from the boot disk that I
 created, but I can't boot it otherwise.  I tried to read up on it in the
 manual, but that's in a different language.

Ralphlogin as root (or 'su -' to root) and in a console
type:

 lilo

lilo should now be installed where you told it to be installed
when you installed Mandrake.

 
 Second question:
 
 I booted Linux with the boot disk, and the GUI takes up more than my screen.
 I can go to the right, left, up, or down with the mouse and it will follow
 it, but it really seems strange.  Is this normal?

Yes, kinda'.  :-)  Press ctl-alt and then either the plus or
minus key as many times as it takes to get the screen back to
the way it was when you started.  You've just toggled through
all of the resolutions that were set during the installation. 
Only the highest resolution will fill the screen without any
part being hidden.

Alan




Re: [newbie] Space problem - help!

2000-09-27 Per discussione Michael

Buy a second hdd? That's what I do. I see 40Gb'ers selling for $135 these
days. Move your /home files there and reinstall Mandrake. You can try
resizing but it's usually easier and safer just to add space. Also you
might look to see if you have any non-programs in that partition (mp3's
ec) and move them to /home.

*^*^*^*
Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sungod robes
 on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little
pickles at you? -- Real Genius

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Sebastian Varges wrote:

 I installed Mandrake as the only OS on my PC with 2GB and used the
 standard settings. Now I have a space problem: there is no space left
 at all in directory '/' but 87% free in /home.  I have lots of strange
 errors because of the space problem in '/'. Deleting some application
 did not help much, and I don't want to delete all of them. 
 
 How can I move space from /home to '/'? Shall I use Diskdrake?? But
 how??? I did not find any documentation. 
 
 
 Thanks alot
 
 -- Sebastian
 





[newbie] Space problem - help!

2000-09-27 Per discussione Sebastian Varges

I installed Mandrake as the only OS on my PC with 2GB and used the
standard settings. Now I have a space problem: there is no space left
at all in directory '/' but 87% free in /home.  I have lots of strange
errors because of the space problem in '/'. Deleting some application
did not help much, and I don't want to delete all of them. 

How can I move space from /home to '/'? Shall I use Diskdrake?? But
how??? I did not find any documentation. 


Thanks alot

-- Sebastian




[newbie] Configuring LAN connection....

2000-09-27 Per discussione dan farley

hi. i log onto a LAN at syracuse university. how do i configure my 
connection to work? i have an 3com ethernet card. I found out how to get to 
the Network COnfig screen where i can enter my IP, default gateway and 
change stuff like that please help...what stuff do i need to know and 
how do i do it!!

dan
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.





Re: [newbie] kernel patch question - failed to patch

2000-09-27 Per discussione Adam

well if you're using patches from kernel.org it might be that they aren't
liking the mandrake kernel rpms' :P that's the first idea, second ".config"
is after you've configured a kernel, "save and exit" (on make xconfig)

I hope that this gives you some sort of an idea, but I'm sure there are many
more qualified users to answer this more clearly


Adam

- Original Message -
From: "Russ Petruzzelli" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 2:06 AM
Subject: [newbie] kernel patch question - failed to patch


 -=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 My first attempt to upgrade my kernel from 2.2.15 failed

 I downloaded   patch-2.2.16.gz  patch-2.2.17.gz   and ran

 gzip -cd /work/kernelpatches/patch-2.2.16.gz | patch -p0from
 /usr/src.

 I got a ton of reject files and failed hunks.

 I also tried using ./scripts/patch-kernel.  Same result.
 -=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 SYSTEM INFO.  Currently running linux-mandrake 7.1.  No special changes
 to the system made.
 -Originally installed from a CD and so far I've never installed
 a patch.

 Pentium 686 with 256 M memory.   13 Gigs of disk space.
 -=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 I did make a copy of my original src directory and redirected my soft
 link to my future-new src.

 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   12 Sep 24 21:13 linux -
 linux-2.2.17/
 drwxr-xr-x   17 root root 4096 Sep 24 19:18 linux-2.2.15/
 drwxr-xr-x   17 root root 4096 Sep 24 22:49 linux-2.2.17/
 -rw-r--r--1 root root  1318138 Sep 24 21:37 patch-2.2.16.gz
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   888488 Sep 24 21:37 patch-2.2.17.gz

 So if I've screwed up 2.2.17, I can go back to 2.2.15 by redirecting my
 soft link -- right?
 -=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Some output  (this was from my second try, thus the patch detected
 complaint):

 [root@bedrock src]#  ./linux/scripts/patch-kernel
 Current kernel version is 2.2.15
 Applying patch-2.2.16 (gzip)... Reversed (or previously applied) patch
 detected!  Skipping patch.
 4 out of 4 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file CREDITS.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/Changes.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 13 out of 13 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/Configure.help.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 11 out of 11 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/computone.txt.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 14 out of 14 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/kbuild/config-language.txt.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 9 out of 9 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/kernel-docs.txt.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/networking/shaper.txt.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 4 out of 4 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/nfsroot.txt.rej
 The next patch would create the file
 Documentation/sound/ChangeLog.ymfsb,
 which already exists!  Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/sound/ChangeLog.ymfsb.rej
 The next patch would create the file Documentation/sound/PSS-updates,
 which already exists!  Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/sound/PSS-updates.rej
 The next patch would create the file Documentation/sound/README.ymfsb,
 which already exists!  Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/sound/README.ymfsb.rej
 The next patch would create the file Documentation/sound/TODO.ymfsb,
 which already exists!  Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/sound/TODO.ymfsb.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 5 out of 5 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/video4linux/README.cpia.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
 Documentation/watchdog.txt.rej
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 5 out of 5 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file MAINTAINERS.rej
 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
 The text leading up to this was:
 --
 |diff -urN v2.2.15/linux/arch/alpha/boot/bootp.c
 linux/arch/alpha/boot/bootp.c
 |--- v2.2.15/linux/arch/alpha/boot/bootp.c Mon Aug  9 12:04:38 1999
 |+++ linux/arch/alpha/boot/bootp.c Wed Jun  7 14:26:42 2000
 --
 File to patch:etc