Wish I had thought to put this site together.
http://drunkdialcongress.org/
Cheers,
Judah
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
A major part of the peace process is for Israel to stop building new
settlements.
That is a FACT.
The United States wants a guarantee from the Israeli Prime Minister that
Israel will STOP building new settlements.
The Israeli Prime Minister said he is NOT going to give any guarantees.
This is af
Sounds like Obama gave the spoiled brats the spanking they deserved.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:12 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
This is my last post on
This is my last post on this thread due to false accusations and other events.
Be that as it may, I'm leaving with a news article that points directly back to
the beginning of this thread - Obama's actions in the middle east and how it
neither supports peace nor makes our allies feel like allie
Jerusalem is the Capital of Israel according to Israel
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> No, Rush doesn't get to decide where it's capital is.
>
> Israel can move their capital wherever they want inside their borders.
> Currently, they have chosen Tel Aviv.
>
~~~
[mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:30 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The region was held by other countries...but there has been political
> administrative units called
No, Rush doesn't get to decide where it's capital is.
Israel can move their capital wherever they want inside their borders.
Currently, they have chosen Tel Aviv.
Judah
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So Israel doesn't even get to decide where it's capital is.
>
> On Thu, Mar 2
stine has been used since the Romans were there...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:52 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
>
>
> The name Pal
So Israel doesn't even get to decide where it's capital is.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Someone might want to tell Rush that the debate isn't about building
> settlements in Tel Aviv.
>
~|
Want to
Someone might want to tell Rush that the debate isn't about building
settlements in Tel Aviv.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I know this is going to piss everyone off but since I'm already famous
> for my poor debating skills what the hell:
>
> "I know Bibi Netanyahu. I'm going
140BCE is the 2nd century BCE, btw.
After the death of Alexander the Great, the formerly vast kingdom was
split up. The area encompassing modern day Israel/Palestine was under
control of Antioch IV when the Jews began to rebel under Mattathias
Maccabeus and his sons.
I was named after Judah Macc
I know this is going to piss everyone off but since I'm already famous
for my poor debating skills what the hell:
"I know Bibi Netanyahu. I'm going to call him up and say, 'There's an
easy way to fix this problem with Obama over building homes in your
own capital. Just change Israel's name to 'I
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> There was independent Jewish kingdom in the region from 140BCE to 37
> BCE under the descendants of the leader of the Maccabees. Â It was
> conquered by Pompey in 37BC. It went from being a client kingdom to a
> province administered by
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Larry C. wrote:
>
> The point remains that it was a deliberate provocation aimed at the
> Vice-President and by extension the country. A deliberate insult. It
> would be the same if immediately before Netanyahu's last visit, the
> State Department announced a $5
There was independent Jewish kingdom in the region from 140BCE to 37
BCE under the descendants of the leader of the Maccabees. It was
conquered by Pompey in 37BC. It went from being a client kingdom to a
province administered by the governor of Syria in 37 AD.
BTW the Maccabees were classic expe
So as leader of the country, Netanyahu is not responsible for what his
underlings do? yet the right wing has had tempertantrums when they
slightly disagree with something an Obama underling has done.
Isn't there a disconnect here?
The point remains that it was a deliberate provocation aimed at t
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> IF you go back further, the reason the Romans booted them out was because of
> their terrorist activities.
>
After the Romans had conquered Judea, you mean? How convenient that
you left that part out. I suppose you think ithe Roman conques
No, the crisis was started by the moron Joe Biden, who totally failed
to listen when Netanyahu said he had not been aware of the new
building permits.
And yet again, you totally fail to understand that we can't cut off
aid to Israel. Do you really believe the Israelis would cave on a
position the
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The region was held by other countries...but there has been political
> administrative units called Palestine.
There weren't and you're own links prove that.
~|
Want to
: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:31 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
>
> It is what was used by governments that ruled the region since the Romans
> renamed it...regardless of why they renamed i
ity
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
Sorry Larry. I was sure it was you that called the Jews the Original
terrorists. Must have been someone else.
Again, I apologize.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons
wrote:
>
> that is pure and utter bullshit. I have ne
Thank you for your apology. I'm surprised I have to admit, I wasn't
expecting one. It takes a gentleman to own up like that.
Best regards,
larry
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Sorry Larry. I was sure it was you that called the Jews the Original
> terrorists. Must have been s
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
>
> It is what was used by governments that ruled the region since the Romans
> renamed it...regardless of why they renamed it...with the exception of the
> Ottomans as they used different naming conventions.
But it wasn't, there was never
Sorry Larry. I was sure it was you that called the Jews the Original
terrorists. Must have been someone else.
Again, I apologize.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> that is pure and utter bullshit. I have never equated Jews with
> terrorists. Do not put words into my
>
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:56 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
>
>
> Do we have to do this again. I guess we do. Balfou
mail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:48 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Palestine is a variant of Philistine...it's the ancient Greek name for
> Philistines:
But I already told you it
itz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:32 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
So you're saying it's a lie? I mean, the way you say it with a link to
Fox implies that you do.
If a news source, a trusted news source in Israel
as Palestine does not have
> that much control over the militant groups. Time for Israel to stop acting
> like a spoiled fucking brat and grow the fuck up.
>
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
> Sent: Wednesday
that is pure and utter bullshit. I have never equated Jews with
terrorists. Do not put words into my mouth to support your crap. Your
tinfoil had is on too tight on your pointy little head.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> They're all extreme lefties that called the Jews the terr
;t matter what it used to mean but how it is used.
You didn't have to use the word, but your states says that is what it is.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Oba
>From perusing the site and seeing the tone of the other articles and op ed
pieces, until I see it elsewhere, yeah.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:32 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power dr
...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:27 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
Are you on crack? There's no connection whatsoever to the Canaanites.
Totally different ethnic groups let along cultures.
And again, we're talking the name o
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Palestine is a variant of Philistine...it's the ancient Greek name for
> Philistines:
But I already told you it's a Hebrew word for invaders. If you look to
see where the Greeks got the word from you'd know that.
> In the 5th century BCE
seoffusion.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:48 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
>
>
> It's what you say to someone who supports Israel to delegitimize them
> in arguments. "Of course you're arguing for Israel, you&
Sorry, but the logic fails when confronted by historic fact. Again,
show me documented locations where the Arab population of the area
were referred to as Palestinian before the mid 1900's.
> IF a place is called Palestine, then the people would be called
> Palestinians
> (even the Jews called th
ch 25, 2010 9:35 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
>
>
> United Nations Middle East envoy Robert Serry, who met with President
> Shimon Peres in Jerusalem on Wednesday, said, "There is no
> humanitarian problem in Gaza."
>
>
LOL
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:23 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
Well he should have put it in the bible then, I mean why wait until
1890 to create a god given right?
On Thu, Mar
moral
policies.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:48 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
It's what you say to someone who supports Israel to delegitimize them
in arguments.
sday, March 25, 2010 9:41 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
>
>
> So you're saying that the Arabs of today using the name Palestinian
> are actually the Philistines of ages ago? That's the only people who
> used anything near the
t's pretty simple logic.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:45 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
No it doesn't. yes it does. no it doesn't. yes it does
turn until he says so.
>
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:33 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
>
>
> Do you even know what Zionism means?
>
Well he should have put it in the bible then, I mean why wait until
1890 to create a god given right?
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Yes...the belief that an Israeli homeland is a god given right. Even large
> groups of Jews disagree with it. Most people consider it
rsday, March 25, 2010 9:41 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
So you're saying that the Arabs of today using the name Palestinian
are actually the Philistines of ages ago? That's the only people who
used anything near the name till the mid 1900's.
On 3
That's a real non-biased source. That looks like the Israeli version of Fox
News.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:35 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
United Na
that
they cannot return until he says so.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:33 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
Do you even know what Zionism means?
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Eric
Ah, because I thought the word had no meaning after 1948.
I bet he'll use neo-con next.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> It's what you say to someone who supports Israel to delegitimize them
> in arguments. "Of course you're arguing for Israel, you're a zionist".
>
It's what you say to someone who supports Israel to delegitimize them
in arguments. "Of course you're arguing for Israel, you're a zionist".
It's used by people in a way that people use nigger, kike, whop,
chink. Doesn't matter what it used to mean but how it is used.
I can't say anything good ab
o: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
>
>
> For the land, never for any people. The use of Palestinian to refer to
> Arabs of the area began in the mid 1900's.
>
> On 3/25/10, Eric Roberts wr
So you're saying that the Arabs of today using the name Palestinian
are actually the Philistines of ages ago? That's the only people who
used anything near the name till the mid 1900's.
On 3/25/10, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> What I posted begs to differ...
~
You said it, not me. I never implied it in the least.
I've already debunked the whole humanitarian crisis thing in another
thread and if anyone is treating the people in Gaza as less than
human, it's their fellow Palestinians. If innocent civilians are made
to suffer by their terrorist 'government
United Nations Middle East envoy Robert Serry, who met with President
Shimon Peres in Jerusalem on Wednesday, said, There is no
humanitarian problem in Gaza.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/136180
That was last month. Again, if you did the basic research you would
see that the
Do you even know what Zionism means?
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Sounds pretty Zionist...
>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion
The historical record says otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:24 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
For the land, never for any people. The use of Palestinian to
Sounds pretty Zionist...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:17 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
I don't know who this guy is but it's in line with what I've read over
t
For the land, never for any people. The use of Palestinian to refer to
Arabs of the area began in the mid 1900's.
On 3/25/10, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> Palestine has been used since the Romans were there...
~|
Want to reach the C
Again, no it is not. The agreement specifically excluded Jerusalem and
if America is going back on its agreement...
But I said this before and you seem to have missed it.
On 3/25/10, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> It's a violation of the agreements to build no new settlements.
I don't know who this guy is but it's in line with what I've read over
the years:
http://www.rosenblit.com/Palestine.htm
Actually, if you read the entire wiki post you'll realize it agrees
with my comments
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> What I posted begs to differ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:48 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
While Palestine in some form or another was sometimes used to refer to
the land it
What I posted begs to differ...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:48 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
While Palestine in some form or another was sometimes used to refer to
the land it never
While Palestine in some form or another was sometimes used to refer to
the land it never represented a nation, ever. There was never a
country called Palestine. The name came from the Romans mocking the
Jews by naming it after their old enemy the Philistines. Yet it was
not actually used to repres
None of this Matters. God has decreed it be so. Those people in Gaza are
less than human.
This has nothing to do with logic.
On 25 March 2010 09:14, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> It also doesn't matter who else is building walls. Just because someone
> else is doing it doesn't mean it is right for Is
...the rest of the world definitely disagrees.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:52 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
The name Palestinians was not used to identify the A
Palestine has been used since the Romans were there...
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:52 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
The name Palestinians was not used to identify
It's a violation of the agreements to build no new settlements.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:07 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
Palestinian side? You mean the
The name Palestinians was not used to identify the Arab population of
the area until recently. If you want to say that Arabs lived there, go
ahead. But they did not have a country any more than the Jews did. The
British ruled there, the Turks, the Caliphate, the Crusaders, Greece,
Rome, etc. We're
fusion.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:56 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
Do we have to do this again. I guess we do. Balfour declaration,
league of nations, UN partition plan, Israel. There is a history here.
Why does Israel have any less right to
com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:58 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
>
>
> Again, when. There have been no settlement expansions in years. If
> you're going to make an inflammatory statement, back it up. And no,
> Jerusa
power drunk on the Middle East
Again, when. There have been no settlement expansions in years. If
you're going to make an inflammatory statement, back it up. And no,
Jerusalem is not a settlement.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> No...Netanyahu created it by ex
Again, when. There have been no settlement expansions in years. If
you're going to make an inflammatory statement, back it up. And no,
Jerusalem is not a settlement.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> No...Netanyahu created it by expanding the settlements. Let's give cre
that pretty clear. He made it pretty clear that he and
> his fellow neo-fascists have no intention of complying with international
> agreements. They have no intention of allowing a Palestinian state.
>
>
>
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto
They're all extreme lefties that called the Jews the terrorists and
wanted the world to look away while the powers of the region sorted
the problem out.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I dont know who any of them are...as you can see, my name is Eric Roberts.
> I think
No...Netanyahu created it by expanding the settlements. Let's give credit
where credit is due.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 6:40 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
O
-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
Dana, Gruss and Larry have all made the same arguments as you. I see a
pattern.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Problem is that most people here in the states support Israel because it
> fits in
s. They have no intention of allowing a Palestinian state.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 4:29 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
1. Jews have been in Israel and Jerus
Hillery says a lot of things. Doesn't make them true. She just said
that Hamas was the ones who named a square after the terrorist
responsible for the worst attack in Israel's history. She knows for a
fact that it was the PA. She just didn't want to say it.
Truth? politics? What do they have to do
Didn't Hillary just say "Israels survival could be in jeopardy unless
it reaches a peace deal with Palestinians?"
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Eric Roberts wrote:
>>
>> I dont support Israel because I think they are no different than
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> I dont support Israel because I think they are no different than Hamas
> other then they use their military to terrorize people. We need to cut off
> support completely, especially after this most recent incident where they
> essential to
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Judah Mc wrote:
>
> Uh, by this same logic we would not have lost over $8 billion dollars
> in *cash* in Iraq. And, well, we did.
Come on, man, we didn't lose it. Someone stole it!
~|
Want to re
1. Jews have been in Israel and Jerusalem specifically for all of
those years. We're not some new element that never existed there.
Passover starts next week and it ends with a single sentence. A
sentence said for generations by millions of Jews. Next your in
Jerusalem. NO other people on earth sa
Dana, Gruss and Larry have all made the same arguments as you. I see a pattern.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Problem is that most people here in the states support Israel because it
> fits in with the Christian end times scenario. If Israel does not occupy
> Jerusal
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> With the amount of people with an irrational hatred for Jews and
> Israel out there, do you think that the program is not heavily
> watched? No, that's not a persecution complex. Like I said, the aid is
> a lightning rod.
>
Uh, by thi
chael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:58 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Obama power drunk on the Middle East
With the amount of people with an irrational hatred for Jews and
Israel out there, do you think that the program is not heavily
watche
"Even after the Cold War, Israel continues to be a vital American
strategic partner. In 2007, the U.S. ambassador to Israel revealed
that Israeli technology was being used by the U.S. armed forces in
Iraq to protect them from Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) that
were responsible for most U.S.
With the amount of people with an irrational hatred for Jews and
Israel out there, do you think that the program is not heavily
watched? No, that's not a persecution complex. Like I said, the aid is
a lightning rod.
But you're right, of the 2.7 billion (for 2010) that is given to
Israel in the fo
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Michael Dinowitz <
mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
> Do you really think that a single cent is not accounted for?
>
Yes, actually.
well, it's accounted for in that SOMEONE knows what it's actually being
spent on
--
We're riding out tonight
To case th
There is not a government program in existence for which "every single
cent" is accounted for, and even IF that were the case here, US
funding of any part of the Israeli budget frees up money to fund
research. Frankly, I don't care if the US gives money to Israel, I
just find it a specious argume
We're not talking actual money here. It's not as if America is
delivering a crate of bills. We're talking 'credit'. Public credit.
Credit linked to an aid package that is ALWAYS used as a point against
Israel whenever the topic comes up in almost every location. Even
here, every time Israel is tal
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Michael Dinowitz <
mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
> From the aid package? none. The aid is specific in what it allows and
> 'fuzzy' things like research is not part of it.
> Research deals are a totally different thing and most of those
> research deals are
>From the aid package? none. The aid is specific in what it allows and
'fuzzy' things like research is not part of it.
Research deals are a totally different thing and most of those
research deals are military in nature, at least those with the US
government.
--
Michael Dinowitz
On Wed, Mar 2
And how much of that tech research was paid for with US aid to Israel?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> I wonder how many of the technologies we take for granted came from
> Israel, specifically internet based technologies (you would be
> surprised). I wonder how much
Well, we're tied to oil so we're not really free to do a lot. But even
with that, we can have a positive effect. We have to move slowly,
carefully, forcefully and fairly. We have to know when to be loud,
when to be soft, and when to be quiet. We have to remember that
everyone in the region is look
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Michael Dinowitz <
mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
> Not many people do know how and why the aid is distributed. Not all of
> our aid to Egypt is tied in such a way, just about 2 billion worth is.
>
> The biggest problem I have with Obama is that the Middle
Not many people do know how and why the aid is distributed. Not all of
our aid to Egypt is tied in such a way, just about 2 billion worth is.
The biggest problem I have with Obama is that the Middle East is a
huge web where a pull on one string will tug another and another. Tug
aid to Israel and
Yeah, Egypt is definitely vital.
I was unaware that US aid to Egypt was tied to the peace treaty with Israel.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> They don't need us, but we need them. Mike is right, we can't lose
> Egypt or there goes the Middle East.
>
> On Tue, Mar 23,
They don't need us, but we need them. Mike is right, we can't lose
Egypt or there goes the Middle East.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:00 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> I dunno...if we want to support Israel for the simple humanitarian reason
> that they are in a hostile area, and we feel that every people s
I dunno...if we want to support Israel for the simple humanitarian reason
that they are in a hostile area, and we feel that every people should have a
right to live in peace in their own home country...then i'm cool with that.
But according to Mike, they don't need us for securityso unless th
The aid that has to be spent in America? The aid that is limited to
military equipment and is used mostly on fuel, ammunition, and the
like? One of the links I provided to Maureen discussed this in more
detail.
The aid (about 3 billion) was part of the peace treaty with Egypt and
I'm all for kill
What I do not understand about that they give us more etc., is that it
ignores the multi billions in aid every year from the US.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:06 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Michael Dinowitz <
> mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Sounds good to me
I wonder how many of the technologies we take for granted came from
Israel, specifically internet based technologies (you would be
surprised). I wonder how much military tech that we use comes from
Israel. Advanced weapons, armor, anti-rocket defense systems, drones.
And medical. And green. And an
They didn't even start construction.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So they did NOT stop the construction.
>
> On 23 March 2010 11:03, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
>
>>
>> And yes, there has been moves behind the scenes to stop it.
~~~
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
