Hi Group.
I have a DSL connection with a DSL modem connected on my NM-4T module .
modem generates its internal clock at 528000 bps.
and other side ( customer ) is same modem with this clock
I want to know at this clock ( 528kbps ) , at a time the total ( SEND +
RECIVE ) can not be over 528kbps
Timo- Which version of the PDM are you referring to that has the VPN config
capability??
I have 1.1.2 now, and I have not found that functionality... Am I just
overlooking something!?!?!
TIA for your response.
-Mark Odette II
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi all,
I passed my written test a few months ago and just finished to build a
lab at home.
I'm curious to know what subjects are asked at the LAB test Routing
Switching. I do not want to know in detail whats happening at the
test but just the topics like:
BGP
OSPF
ISDN Frame
VPN
IPsec etc
Hi Group.
I have a DSL connection with a DSL modem connected on my NM-4T module .
modem generates its internal clock at 528000 bps.
and other side ( customer ) is same modem with this clock
I want to know at this clock ( 528kbps ) , at a time the total ( SEND +
RECIVE ) data can not be over
Hi all,
I would like to find out some info about Cisco SmartNet. Can I buy a
SmartNet (for a particular category) for EOL equipment? This is for cisco
2503 for example.
Thanks.
Widjaja
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40795t=40795
Hi Mason,
I doubt that there is an universal VPN clients that can make a VPN
connection to a Cisco VPN product, except the client made
by Cisco.
Last time I did attend a two days training for VPN 5000, at that
time we have to use VPN 5000`s client.
HTH
- Original Message -
From:
How about lock the courier inside the box, throw away the key, keep the
diamond?
Patrick
Ramsey
cc:
To everyone, thank you for your advice, what you wrote seems reasonable.
However it seems this would mean if there are only single channel
connections (64k or 56k only) [m]route-cache and fair-queue can remain
enabled. I'll try that asap.
Heiko Herold
--
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL
With PDM 2.0 and PIX OS 6.2 you will be able to do this. It was suppose to
be out last month.. I guess they are still working the bugs out of it...
Tim
CCIE 9015
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark Odette II
Sent: Monday, April 08,
Very extensive, mad :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40800t=40785
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
Does anybody know of any sites similiar to R1R2.com that allow you to
configure a Pix Firewall ??? Or any software similiar to Boson Router Sim
that
will allow you to configure a Pix ???
Or any other suggestions regarding Pix hands-on training ...
Kind regards ...
Paul ..
Message Posted
I had classes at Cisco on SAFE (EXCELLENT STUFF IF ANYONE GET'S TO GO!!) ,
and the Cisco rep said the same thing - never put anything in core. If you
look at the SAFE blueprint for Enterprises, the IDS aren't in the core
either (I checked last week).
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
The Cisco site says you are responsible for anything in IOS 12.1. If
the test were any more specific, it wouldn't be as highly regarded as it
is.
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 02:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I passed my written test a few months ago and just finished to build a
lab at
I don't think you can, besides bridging on every internet hop.
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 23:14, cage wrote:
how can I make the netbios over Internet except the dlsw+ ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40804t=40784
--
Hello i currently have a masters in telecom and i am also ccna, wireless .
My CCNA runs out may of 2003. Should i go for the ccnp or go for the
security specialization.
Thanks Joe R.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40805t=40805
BGP Rules of thumb:
BGP advertised prefix must also exist in local IGP table.
iBGP learned prefix must also exist in local IGP table
-or use #no sync on iBGP learning router, but if you do, you'd sure as
hell better know why you disabled it.
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 09:22, Phil Barker wrote:
Guys
Any of you familier with issues between ISDN and Cisco VPN Client (IPSEC
3DES). All of my ISDN users unable to VPN using Cisco VPN Client, and we
have pICX 515.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40807t=40807
--
How about lock the courier inside the box, throw away the key, keep the
diamond?
With that answer, you probably would get the Microsoft job, but
they'd offer you one in competitive marketing!
how about lock his box inside your box, let him keep his key and send the
key with your box with
Dear Group,
I'm confused.
In a multi-vendor enviroment I've to design a VLANs scenario.
So I can prefer 802.1Q tagging (standard) on the trunk link. And then? How
to
manage the VLAN informations?
Is VTP (or DTP) a cisco protocol?
Is there a standard in order to manage the vlan information
How about NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NBT) and encapsulate
it with IPSec. Another idea is using a GRE tunnel to
pass the NetBIOS to the next hop.
I don't think you can, besides bridging on every internet hop.
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 23:14, cage wrote:
how can I make the netbios over Internet
Actually the answer to this is very simple... The '0x' means
hexadecimal - this has been mentioned several times. The '0' indicates
that it is a number, as opposed to a variable. 0xff can be
interpreted by the parser as a number, but xff would be interpreted as
a variable name...
Mike Bray
Looking at the traffic should not slow anything down. The IDS blade has its
own processor and is a completely separate device from the sup. If
anything, the IDS blade may not be able to keep up with the traffic and you
may miss some traffic for inspection, ie. the IDS blade might not catch all
Is it possible to send nonroutable traffic through a GRE Tunnel?
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 10:12, Engelhard M. Labiro wrote:
How about NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NBT) and encapsulate
it with IPSec. Another idea is using a GRE tunnel to
pass the NetBIOS to the next hop.
I don't think you can,
No, we upgraded it ourselves Rico, I was there throughout the ninetieswe
went from Banyan environments to IP (Unix/NT).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rico Ortiz
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I can think one one good reason why you would disable sync, you can't
redistribute 100K routes into ANY IGP. Why are you so concerned about
disabling sync?? It should be default.
Dave
Jay wrote:
BGP Rules of thumb:
BGP advertised prefix must also exist in local IGP table.
iBGP
Hi all,
can anyone tell me if you have two cat3548's configured with an crossover
connecting them (trunk port for all intensive purposes) and you port mirror
vlan 1 on a single port on one of the switches (all ports are in vlan 1) will
you get all traffic to the mirror port including those from
Not once you have successfully completed your CCNP. As long as you shift
yourself into the design-frame of mind, you should have no problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
amanda lalli-cafini
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 10:26 PM
To:
test
amanda lalli-cafini wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi Andy,
gee... passing a cisco test in 2 weeks would be pretty fast.
regards,
amanda
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40817t=40732
It's not default for the same reason why unicast rpf (antispoofing) is
not default in ISO; because people are stupid, and under poor design, it
could produce very undesirable and hard to troubleshoot results. In
other words, if you don't know why you are disabling synchronization,
don't do it.
hey amanda..
passing a cisco (ccnp) test in 2 weeks is easy..
these ccnp tests are very easy but soon they would all change into
640-603,4,5,6 which are not going to be that easy..
i myself completely my ccnp-4 exams in 40 days.
amanda lalli-cafini wrote in message
[EMAIL
took that bscn test today, 69 ?'s and a bunch of time, but finished with
only about 8 minutes left. Equal mix of EIGRP/OSPF/BGP and a couple of
questions (each) regarding the rest of the exam outline. scored an
801..but it's passing.
Message Posted at:
I don't think it can.
As far as I know, it can do IP/IPX/DecNet/AppleTalk/Vines/CLNS.
NetBios over TCP/IP will work with GRE but not straight NetBios or SNA.
If GRE works with NetBios or SNA, it will be cool.
I think that is why we use DLSW with NetBios and SNA connection.
Ed
-Original
Hello all,
I schedule myself to take the new CCNA exam next week, could someone let me
know should I buy all three Boson exams or just the #1 exam is good enough
for
the new version.
Thanks
Philip
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40822t=40822
It might be good to post some sanitized configs.
Without that, my first guess would be to check what you define as
interesting traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Curious [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ISDN and VPN (IPSEC
This is why we love Priscilla. :-)
Here we were making the ASSumption that we were using a classfull subnet
mask.
Thank you, Priscilla, for once again letting us know we aren't really
worthy! :-)
--Tim
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
How many bits are defining network IDs and how many are
I worked my last contract I don't want to say where, but a major
educational testing place. They still had banyan Vines in 2001. although
I didn't touch it besides migration. I didn't think it was still around.
We migrated them to Windows 2000. The banyan Vines servers left, but the
mindsets of
Paul,
Go to Ole Drews Jensen's website: www.routerchief.com, Free Software,
and download the PIX QUIZ - PIX command trainer. This is an excellent,
free software.
This small software will help you master the PIX commands in no time!
Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I believe you are right... You are working on a ROUTER, therefore, it
prefers to ROUTE ROUTABLE traffic. If you take the ROUTING option away,
then it will attempt other configured methods of forwarding traffic.
--Tim
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
At 11:50 AM 4/6/02, nntp.groupstudy.com
Hello all,
I schedule myself to take the new CCNA exam next week, could someone let me
know should I buy all three Boson exams or just the #1 exam is good enough
for
the new version.
Thanks
Philip
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40829t=40829
There may be another problem with the Scenario 3:
How R1 int0 will talk to R2 int1 if they are on the same subnet? Are you
going to bridge ip traffic?
-- Lidiya White
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 9:20 PM
To: [EMAIL
AFAIK, if you have to two switches connected via a trunk link and you mirror
VLAN1 to a port, you should see all of the traffic in VLAN1 (i.e. from all
switches involved in that VLAN). You'll probably run into a situation where
all of the traffic in VLAN1 will overrun your mirror port (which on
I understand the what sync does and I also assume that someone setting
up such an config, dual homed full routing, should understand BGP
fundamentals.
It's like auto summerization, I have never seen it fix anything but I
have seen it cause problems many times.
Dave
Jay wrote:
It's not
You can use NetBIOS over TCP/IP (using some kind of encryption if you
choose), or if you have Cisco routers at either end connected to the
internet, you can use DLSw+ to form peers between those two routers to
tunnel the NetBIOS across any IP network (LAN/WAN, etc) which allows Layer 2
NetBEUI is non-routable. NetBIOS is routable. NetBIOS over TCP/IP should
supposedly work over the Internet. For example, can't you do file sharing
over the Internet? That uses NetBIOS and SMB of CIFS.
(I'm a Mac person, but in theory it should work. ;-)
Priscilla
At 10:43 AM 4/8/02, Jay
The biggest obstacle is the fact that most ISP's filter NBT traffic. It
works just fine over a VPN connection, as the ISP doesn't see the NBT
packets; they see VPN traffic. Basically all you have to do is get around an
access list blocking ports 137, 138, and 139.
-Original
At 12:15 PM 4/8/02, Michael Williams wrote:
AFAIK, if you have to two switches connected via a trunk link and you mirror
VLAN1 to a port, you should see all of the traffic in VLAN1 (i.e. from all
switches involved in that VLAN).
Only traffic that actually crosses the mirrored port, though,
A little bird told me that old, non IOS routers were
still topics on the beta for RA...
--- Steve Ringley wrote:
Its an interesting question about the exam though as
the 700 series is not
on the current product list. I am working on this
exam next, and hate to
spend time on something
See comments below.
At 11:19 PM 4/7/02, Kent Browning wrote:
Thanks a lot Priscilla. This is what I was looking for.
I suppose my part 2 to the previous question would make more sense if I used
live IPs like Scenario 3
Scenario 3
==
---int0-(R1)-int1 int0-(R2)-int1 ---
Router
You certainly can do file sharing over the internet - saying 'NetBIOS'
is routable is a bit misleading though... It's the underlying protocol
that determines its ability to be routed...
-mike bray
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL
This thread has been taken out of context. The real initial question
was whether or not you could bridge over the internet. E.g., have 2
LANs that are Layer 2 Bridged over the internet. Somewhat like DLSw+
can do for NetBIOS and SNA. It would have the same effect as doing
this: (which you
I agree.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: netbios over internet [7:40784]
You certainly can do file sharing over the internet - saying 'NetBIOS'
is routable is a bit misleading
The original question was:
how can I make the netbios over Internet except the dlsw+ ?
He didn't say bridging. You did.
Priscilla
At 01:29 PM 4/8/02, Jay wrote:
This thread has been taken out of context. The real initial question
was whether or not you could bridge over the internet. E.g.,
Of course it may require more than 2 weeks for your CCDP if you haven't
completed your CCDA which is a requirement.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
amanda lalli-cafini
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 10:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
im discussing here at my company to deploy ip/tv . has anyone tried it
what do i need. i was reading at cisco web site that you need a nt server
which will have the digitizer card...
George Gittins
Internet Systems Manager
Weslaco, Tx 78599
Phone (956)9696557
Message Posted at:
The only traffic from the mirror port that would be from
the other switch would be trunked data. Local traffic on the
other switch will not traverse the trunk and would not be seen.
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, OK, well what about my question then? Is there any way to do this?
this: (which you can't do)
int tunnel0
tun sour 10.10.10.1
tun dest 10.20.20.1
bridge-group 1
int eth0
bridge-group 1
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 14:15, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
The original question
Correct
-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Puzzles - WAS RE: My interview story [7:40553]
The first one is simple if you relate it to public key sharing in
network
security.
Place
Actually 0' is physically impossible due to the width of the rope
needing to be taken into account, but that's just a technicality.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Puzzles - WAS
we use ip/tv extensively at the cisco campus for all sorts of
multicast video. I can put you in touch with our ip/tv broadcast
manager if you like...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Gurus-
I have a situation where I am using IRB to bridge a network over a
T1. I have been trying to get this backed up by using an ISDN BRI dialback
with dialer profiles. I have been mostly unsuccessful except for roughly 3
minutes where it worked and then ceased working and has not
Hello, all :-)
I was hoping one (or many) of you could help me with a question I have: how
do I lock-down ports on a server? I know how to lock them down on firewalls
and routers, but how to do it on a server is my question. I know it's a
general question but any assistance would be most
Which operating systems?
On windows the most common way to to disable services from the control
panel. Do a netstat -an to see which ports are open. Then you can shutdown
services that have those ports open.
On UNIX/LINUX you can do the same netstat -an. Most of the services can be
disabled in
do you men ethernet ports or tcpip ports?
Ethernet ports are done in the driver autonegotiate/speed/duplex settings
locking down tcpip ports is entirely different. TCPwrappers will wrap
daemons and applications under *nix... not so sure there is an equivalent
for microsoft or
Thank you, Sam. Your instructions were clear and simple to follow. I was
refering to a Windows system. I gave it a try and already idenitified open
ports (which I also learned from using WS PingPro). I will now attempt to
close/end some services. Thanks again.
Charlie
sam sneed wrote in
I got a message saying it was not a valid value. Is that because I tried to
just do one zero (my thinking being it would then give me the valid options
for holdtime)
I tried
ROUTER BGP 100
neighbor 1.1.1.1 timers 0 ?
Anthony Pace
Chris Camplejohn wrote in message
[EMAIL
Patrick -
I was refering to TCP/IP ports. Thanks for your reply. Sam's message came
in very handy and answered my question as well. Thanks again.
Charlie
Patrick Ramsey wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
do you men ethernet ports or tcpip ports?
Ethernet ports
Charlie,
As others noted, it depends on your OS. I would recommend doing a search on
google for your OS+hardening. You'll probably find what your looking for.
Also consult your vendors web site and http://www.sans.org for more info.
HTH,
Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Priscilla is correct, normally a span only shows unicast for the VLAN on the
switch where the span is enabled plus any bcast or mcast from other switches
that have active ports in the VLAN in question. However, there is a remote
span capability that has been added to the 6000 series in 5.3 code
I know that many of you studying for your CCIE lab are looking for good
deals on some of the more critical peices of CCIE lab gear.
As some of you may or may not know, the Catalyst 3900 series was
originally made by Olicom, and known as the Olicom OC-8600 (Catalyst 3900)
and the OC-8601
Jay wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
OK, OK, well what about my question then? Is there any way to do this?
Yes - UTI
this: (which you can't do)
int tunnel0
tun sour 10.10.10.1
tun dest 10.20.20.1
bridge-group 1
int eth0
bridge-group
The router will bridge all traffic on those interfaces EXCEPT IP. If you
want to bridge IP you disable IP routing or use CRB or IRB which lets you
configure your choice of bridge/route per protocol per interface (in the
case of IRB you route into the bridge group via the BVI.
Anthony Pace
Yes there is, it's called GVRP which is part/extension
of 802.1q. Not all vendors support this though so
YMMV.
VTP, DTP are Cisco propiertary.
--- TP wrote:
Dear Group,
I'm confused.
In a multi-vendor enviroment I've to design a VLANs
scenario.
So I can prefer 802.1Q tagging (standard)
I meant to add to this thread yesterday and didn't get around to it.
Be aware that there are bugs with PPP Multilink and fancy queueing (as
Cisco puts it) in IOS 12.0. Or at least when interworking 12.0 with
either 11.2 or 12.1 - I don't think I've confirmed it with 12.0 at both
ends.
By
Hi Charlie,
FYI, Microsoft just release the Security Operation Guide for Windows 2000
server. Here is the link to it
Hope this help!
Bac
-Original Message-
From: Charlie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hardening Ports?
I am trying to configure a PIX firewall behind the Cayman DSL router.
Because we only have one Public IP address which is used by Cayman router. I
will use 192.168.1.x and 192.168.0.x for the two segments of PIX. Cayman
router does NAT job for all users. In this case, could I configure the PIX
You can also try using the IP Filtering feature from Windows NT/2000. It
should be under the advanced configuration for TCP/IP.
cheekin
- Original Message -
From: Charlie
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:40 AM
Subject: Re: Hardening Ports? [7:40852]
Thank you, Sam. Your
Thanks for the info. What will they think of next? ;-) You better have big
pipes between those switches. I love the way Cisco gives you enough rope to
hang yourself. I was glad to see that they don't let you SPAN BPDUs. You
could really screw things up that way! ;-)
Priscilla
At 05:37 PM
4/8/2002 9:45pm Monday
I have two Catalyst 3920's connected to two 3640 router w/ NM 1FE1R2W.
I do not see what the big deal is about this switch !!!
Can you please explain the TrCRF and TrBRF thing ?
Thanks a great deal,
Richard
//
Brian wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
hello daniel :
you can do it
Daniel Ma wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am trying to configure a PIX firewall behind the Cayman DSL router.
Because we only have one Public IP address which is used by Cayman router.
I
will use 192.168.1.x and 192.168.0.x for
3524 .try it.
Ouellette, Tim wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Team,
can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our
6509's. Port 7/2 is connected via fiber to a 3524 closet switch. We've
tried replacing the gbic's on both the 6509 and
My apologies. Posted to the wrong group.
cheekin
- Original Message -
From: Chee Kin
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: Hardening Ports? [7:40852]
You can also try using the IP Filtering feature from Windows NT/2000. It
should be under the advanced
Tim,
I've had a similar problem in the past between a 5500 and 6509. It was a
bad blade in the 5500.
R/
Dave
On 4/8/02 10:54 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ouellette, Tim wrote:
Team,
can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our
6509's. Port 7/2 is
Hi,
You did not paste your configs, but they should be similar to below:
On the 3524 switch
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
On the 3524, use the following command:
show interface g0/1
All you have to do to do NetBIOS over the internet is either use WINS or
reference the share by IP address, assuming you are using either NT or
Win2K.
For instance, from a command prompt:
net use X: \\123.123.123.123\C$ /user:ntdomain\ntusername
Thththththats all folks.
God knows why you
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Only traffic that actually crosses the mirrored port, though,
right?
Broadcast /multicast traffic for the VLAN as well as traffic
directed to
ports on the switch doing mirroring that are in VLAN 1.
You're absolutely right. I can't explain my lack of thorough
Tim,
This should do it for you
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html
It appears that you didn't disable trunk negotiation on the 6500. Since the
3500XL doesn't support DTP you are having trouble.
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
From:
Kent Hundley wrote:
However, there
is a remote
span capability that has been added to the 6000 series in 5.3
code that
does allow you to see the traffic for an entire vlan from any
switch in the
net:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/41.html#remote
Is there an equivalent version in
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
For example, can't you do
file sharing
over the Internet? That uses NetBIOS and SMB of CIFS.
(I'm a Mac person, but in theory it should work. ;-)
A Mac person? I thought you had good judgement? (Please no flames, it's
a good natured joke)
You *can* indeed
Hi group ,
we have around 400 computers in the building on the lan .I have one 2610
router which is our gateway router on the ethernet of the router i am
recieving huge amount of multicast and crc4 errors . I have one more
Telendus router which connected with my customer on serial .The
You cant use dtp with 3524, use the
set trunk */* nonegoitate dot1q to force it to trunk...
Also make sure you enble on the ge 0/1 on the 3524 as a switch port mode
trunk with dot1q encapsulation
That will force it to trunk, and life will be sweet. We use Dual 6509's with
10 3548XLs and its
I disagree that most ISP's block the following:
tcp or udp 135 (mapping)
tcp or udp 137 (NetBIOS Name Service)
udp 138 (NetBIOS datagrams - the actual data)
tcp 139 (NetBIOS Session)
Any more than they block the rest of it. If they did, for one thing, your
firewalls wouldn't be blocking this
Dear guys,
I have a stupid question (I'm sure) but I do not have any idea to approach
this question. I was using promicious in RA, RB,RC, and remote peer Ra to
RB, but I don't know how to use only one peer to build session Between
RA,RB,RC.
RA === RB === RC
Can you build session from RA to
Thanks for the quick response guys.
Found a faulty mx extender between the 6509 and the 3524.
Does the 3524 support pagp? I did receive a message from David mentioning
something about having the 6509 being set to negotiate the dot1q. I'll have
to look into this a little more.
Anyone one else a
usmdlz1329000101 (enable) sh trunk 7/2
* - indicates vtp domain mismatch
Port Mode Encapsulation StatusNative vlan
--- - ---
7/2 on dot1q not-trunking 1
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
94 matches
Mail list logo
