Hi,
Is this the new version toug, I have no hand's on experence in trouble
shooting, I am planning to write this monday CCNP support,
how many questions will be on simulation , are they really tough?
Thank you
Sunil
Message Posted at:
Hi,
Is this the new version toug, I have no hand's on experence in trouble
shooting, I am planning to write this monday CCNP support,
how many questions will be on simulation , are they really tough?
Thank you
Sunil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49835t=49496
This is not the first time I have seen this happen. A bit over a year ago I
did some training on RiverDelta, now part of Motorola, (cable modem UBRs
like the Cisco 7246's) equipment and they had the exact IOS on their UBRs as
Cisco did on theirs. From the training it looked like they had only a
Yes, it is focused on EIGRP, OSPF, and BGP. I just took it a couple of weeks
ago for a client commitment and it didn't stray from those topics (at least
on my exam).
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cluett [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 5:34 PM
To:
Not sure whether Cisco could close them down if they wanted.
Wouldn't like to be on Cisco's side as they roll in to China.
They can probably do enough business in their own part of the worls to keep
the family fed and watered.
Do China abide by everyone elses laws?
Dunno...
Priscilla
Cat 6509 seems to like to do it too
Core-1(config)#do sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) c6sup1_rp Software (c6sup1_rp-DSV-M), Version 12.1(11b)E4, EARLY
DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
-Original Message-
From: Moffett, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL
To reinstall the IOS on a 2600 with an incorrect image, you will need to
use TFTP from ROMMON.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/76.html
Make sure the image that you download is correct for the exact 2600
model you have. For the 2651, depending on what you want to do, I would
use a 12.2
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I can't for the life of me remember what the recommended
maximum number of clients on one segment is, I think it was
either 300 or 500.
IP is 500
IPX is 300
AppleTalk is 200
NetBIOS is 200
Mixed is
Hi All,
I am trying to pilot the survival remote site on the Cisco 1760-V router
with the VIC-2FXO module and 2 Cisco 7960 IPphones. Is it possible to setup
the SRS with these equipments without the CallManager? Can I manually
configure the IP phones and map them on the Cisco routers? Thanks!
All,
I passed the CCNA, and found it varied as far as what types of questions the
asked. Is the Routing exam the same. So far the study material seems very
focused on OSPF, EIGRP, and BGP. Any coments?
Rob Cluett, CCNA
Message Posted at:
They are currently doing on the order of 4 billion in annual sales IIRC.
At 05:42 PM 7/26/2002 +, David Armstrong wrote:
Does anyone remember what happened to Compaq when they reverse engineered
IBM's PCs and then sold their products at significantly lower prices?
Has anyone seen this
This is an excellent addition to the IOS. I have been anticipating a
command with this functionality for quite some time as Juniper has had this
capability from the beginning of JunOS.
By the way, it works on a 2500 series router with 12.2(8)T5 code!
MADMAN wrote in message
[EMAIL
Doesn't work on a 7206 VXR
At 7/25/2002 06:00 PM, MADMAN reminisced:
Thought this was pretty cool!!
c7304(config)#do sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 7300 Software (C7300-JS-M), Version 12.1(1.23.020716.), CISCO
DEVELOPME
NT TEST VERSION
Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by
Re-Install the Correct IOS.
. . wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi
I have a Cisco 2651 with two Fast Ethernet interfaces. I have accidentally
installed a Cisco 2600 IOS image. now when I do a show run the
interfaces
are not there anymore. I tried to make it
If you don't want the run the IGP on the firewall, then just run
something between the 2 gateway routers. iBGP would do the trick, and
you are running BGP anyway. You could still use HSRP for your own extra
router redundancy, but not for upstream selection.
On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 16:28, sam
With custom queueing you can classify the traffic as well as give parameters
as to how many packets each queue will service before moving on the next
one. With CBWFQ, each class is treated as a WFQ so that large flows don't
choke out the smaller ones.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
You can start by blocking TCP port 554 (see RFC 2326).
BTW, Steaming Audio - does that involve a 900 number?
:-)
Hth,
Ole
~
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
RWR Enterprises, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From what I can see, you've initiated NAT, but didn't define a NAT Pool
of addresses. So, I can only deduce that the PIX is defaulting to PAT
operation rather than just not allowing traffic across the PIX at all.
(wasn't that nice of Cisco :-] )
I'm just starting to study the ins/outs of PIX,
Theoretically yes.
But the ip is reserved and nearly ever changes..
From: Jake
Reply-To: Jake
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can get it to work (Pix 515 behind cable modem [7:49744]
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:44:35 GMT
Is the outside interface doing DHCP from the ISP with the setroute
I think that you should wait until it is actually illegal to purchase this
equipment and then go on a diatribe. Until then the prospect of solid
competition is good for all. Even if it does become illegal in this country
you have got a hard row upstream in some Asian countries to get them to
did more research, would a next-hop-self on RA and RB respectively do
the trick?
sam sneed wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a pair of 2621's and 2 reduandant ethernet handoffs to my ISP. 1 is
a
primary and the other is a backup which should only be used
Kevin- Disregard my last post... I read your message wayyy to quickly,
and interpreted it to be asking why you were getting PAT results rather
than NAT as expected.
In reflection, I realize what you are actually asking, and also realize
that the configuration is missing Access Lists or Conduits.
Kevin,
Kim's right... If you've posted your entire config, then you've not opened
any ports. By default, the PIX won't allow traffic through. You have to
specifically enable what you want.
Create an access list and apply it to the inside interface:
access-list acl_inside permit ip any any
If I understand you correctly, I don't think that HRSP is what you
need. HRSP is good if upstream serial interfaces go down, or something
like that, or for router redundancy, but in your situation I would
suggest letting your IGP determine which upstream is active, based on
who is still
Didn't Apple have a successful case against Franklin back in the early
80's? I remember having a Franklin or two in school along with all the
other real Apple IIe boxes, but I seem to recall that Apple nailed them
and made them stop making IIe clones.
John
Kent Hundley 7/26/02 1:42:34 PM
Thanks
Ill let u know what the outcome is..
From: Craig Columbus
To: Kevin O'Gilvie
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can get it to work (Pix 515 behind cable modem [7:49744]
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 12:09:50 -0400
Kevin,
Kim's right... If you've posted your entire config, then you've not
I have a very small network, only 3 networks so i really don;t want to run
an IGP. I especially don't want to run it on my firewall. The ISP suggested
the HSRP solution since we are using static route between our firewall and
these 2 routers. I know there has to be way to do this and am trying to
To erase the flash, try:
Router#erase flash
To boot to ROMMON, try:
Router#config t
Router(config)#config 0x2100
Then reload. To change the configuration register back to boot from flash
while in ROMMON, try:
rommon1confreg 0x2102
Hope this helps,
robert
Message Posted at:
Are you using Windows NT?
McHugh Randy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I did a write erase and reload on a 4000 router and now cant access it via
the console. Just get a blinking prompt. Any suggestions? All the terminal
settings are correct.
thx
Message
I am considering deploying QoS features in our ISP. The ISP has about
60 thousand users in total, and I was thinking of setting a general
traffic policy.E.g., I would like to set HTTP traffic down to a very
low delay, to make the network seem faster to end users. I suppose
what I am
Try this site.
http://www.mibcentral.com/index.shtml
Ken Trexler
Ken's Web Page(http://www.geocities.com/trexken_2000)
America is not like a blanket--one piece of unbroken cloth, the
same color, the same texture, the same size. America is more like
a quilt--many patches, many pieces, many
Forgive me for being rude. It was certainly not my intention.
JR
--
Johnny Routin
Don Claybrook wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Thanks, Johnny, but I know the protocol around here and I note with irony
that in your misguided attempt to keep me from being
change the outside interface to auto, create dhcpd address pool and enable
dhcpd pool inside.
int e0 auto
dhcpd enable inside
dhcpd address 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.15 inside
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49803t=49744
what you need to do is;
ip addr outside 10.1.2.2 255.255.255.0
ip addr inside 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
access-list access_out per ip any any
access-group access_out in int outside
nat (inside) 0 0 0
be careful with what are you going to permit in access-list
Message Posted at:
Does anyone remember what happened to Compaq when they reverse engineered
IBM's PCs and then sold their products at significantly lower prices?
Has anyone seen this company listed on a US stock exchange? I wouldn't be
surprised if these guys did very well.
David Armstrong
Message Posted
if there are no address translations then
for connections initiated from outside to internal
network, is static command needed ? (I am providing
an access list for connections initiated from the
outside network though, anything else needed ??)
--- John Green wrote:
this setup is simple with
Team,
For those security people on the Cisco World, Normally which interface do
you use the most, the CLI or the PDM. I am in the process of setting up
standards and we would like to define one for having access to our Pix.
Thanks,
Juan Blanco
two questions here:
first so no static command would be needed ? is that
correct ?
second, about the nat statement
nat (inside) 0 0 0
the cisco docs show actually 4 zeros, the last being
flags while the first two meaning 0.0.0.0 right ? did
you miss out the last zero ?
--- Peter zhang
Thanks Peter,
Ill try that..
From: Peter zhang
Reply-To: Peter zhang
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Can get it to work (Pix 515 behind cable modem) [7:49744]
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 17:56:38 GMT
change the outside interface to auto, create dhcpd address pool and enable
dhcpd pool inside.
We are primarily a Cabletron shop. We have a lot of vh2402's and I wanted to
see if there was someone on the list that had both the vh2402's and the
catalyst 2950-24's. I've read the specs on both of them but I wanted to hear
the real world comparison. TIA.
No contest - the CLI.
Juan Blanco wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Team,
For those security people on the Cisco World, Normally which interface do
you use the most, the CLI or the PDM. I am in the process of setting up
standards and we would like to define one
this setup is simple with two networks
with no address translations anywhere.
10.1.1.0/24 ---PIX--- 10.1.2.0/24
i have put in two access lists, one each for both
interfaces
access-list access_in permit ip any any
access-list access_out permit ip any any
access-group access_in in
If you can live with the fact that PDM is very slow, then use PDM, it's far
more intuitive for access control (which is what PIX is made for...)
Aurelian
-Original Message-
From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Group,
Regardless whether Huawei reverse-engineered Cisco products or not.
Regardless the fact that their OS almost match with Cisco and they offer
platforms with almost same conventions and even introducing same
certifications to gain credability for them.
I believe it's Cisco's concern
I would added eigrp stub connected on spoke routers (I think you need ios
12.0) if you don't do that, based in my experience, you're going to have
SIAs on your backbone. See the following link:
Yes, I'm not sure what platforms it does work on, I tried it on 2500's,
2600's and 4500's with no luck
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Check this new
I cant change any configurations on the Modem.
Its a Motorola Surfboard usXXX
optimum online set it up.
Do u know how I can go about getting into that modem to check the configs?
From: Mike Sweeney
Reply-To: Mike Sweeney
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Can get it to work (Pix 515 behind
Juan,
I love your quote.
Keep the CLI going I think that keeps you more tuned..
Dont want to become Checkpoint!!
Or Windows vs Unix..
From: Juan Blanco
Reply-To: Juan Blanco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CLI vs PDM [7:49774]
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:45:39 GMT
Team,
For those security
Hi group,
Huawei routers were introduced into the local market sometime in the past 2
months in an asian networking exhibition called Communicasia.
That's where I met the Huawei distributor whom had volunteered to provide a
demo set for me to play with (myself from an international mnc, has
Craig Columbus wrote:
Am I the only one who finds it troubling that this company has,
apparently,
copied Cisco's proprietary designs and is selling them as their own?
Your concerns are reasonable, however, cisco is big, they're majorly
profitable, and they have access to the best lawyers
Ya but you don't need the do command.
Dave
Juan Blanco wrote:
Please, correct me if I am wrong, but you can execute any command on the
pix's box while you are in config mode as well
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Hi all,
I can't for the life of me remember what the recommended
maximum number of clients on one segment is, I think it was
either 300 or 500.
IP is 500
IPX is 300
AppleTalk is 200
NetBIOS is 200
Mixed is 200
Also, those numbers from Cisco are pretty dated. These days
I have the do command in config mode (in c3640-i-mz.122-5d.bin), but the
output is only:
router(config)#do ?
. Version number
-Original Message-
From: Dan Penn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Check this new command
Tom Scott wrote:
BTW what does wei mean in futurewei and huawei?
Thief? Copy Cat? One who has no innate creativity and takes ideas from
others? ;-)
Seriously, they can't possibly have stolen the actual IOS code or Cisco
would close them down. Most of the protocols are industry standards,
My pleasure John. Please keep us informed about the results of your
implementation and if all is working fine, I'm very intersted in that kind
of summarization in eigrp
JohnZ wrote:
Thank you David and Steven, I didn't even know the existence of
stub command
in Eigrp. I learn something new
What code rev is this in? I have some 12.2(5)+ and I don't see it. Is
this just in specific 12.1 Development Test images?
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Check this new command out
Groupstudy,
I'd be very very surprised if Huawei violated Cisco's rights, simply because
Huawei is the largest networking gear company in China, if they did anything
suspicious, Cisco would surely find them. From what I know, Huawei is a
pretty ethical company for a multi national corporation,
Your do command is this
router(config)#downward-compatible-config ?
. Version number
router(config)#downward-compatible-config
- Original Message -
From: Moffett, Ryan
To:
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: Check this new command out [7:49717]
I have the do
On 3620 with 12.2(8)T5 works:
R1(config)#do ?
LINE Exec Command
R1(config)#do show mem
HeadTotal(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b)
Largest(b)
Processor 6270252018864864 9399224 9465640 9249100
9412936
I/O390 7340056 4821752
It appears to be int 12.2.8T5. I downloaded it into a 7206 after
someone from Cisco mentioned he thought it was available in 12.2.8T
It's not going to fix anything but it can be convenient!!
Dave
Moffett, Ryan wrote:
What code rev is this in? I have some 12.2(5)+ and I don't see it.
Here is how I got mine to work.
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.11.20 53 216.254.25.74 53
extendable
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.11.20 53 216.254.25.74 53
extendable
The first line is if someone else is a secondary dns server for you and
you do zone transfers that's why tcp.
Hi
I have a Cisco 2651 with two Fast Ethernet interfaces. I have accidentally
installed a Cisco 2600 IOS image. now when I do a show run the interfaces
are not there anymore. I tried to make it to boot from boot but the
interfaces is not showing up.
If you can give me some help, that would
I geuss no-one believes in buying American made anymore. No wonder our
economy is as bad as it is. I had to say it.
Please send all flames to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Alex Lei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL
Is the outside interface doing DHCP from the ISP with the setroute command.
If so, this would mean that your global ip on your outside interface
changes. Am I correct to assume this??
Kevin O'Gilvie wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dear All,
Below is my config.
Can someone tell me
Just thought I'd comment on this
Let me issue a disclaimer first:
I've never heard of these routers until this thread. I'm only responding
to the information presented in these posts. I've been, so far, unable to
verify the information presented for myself. If I'm mistaken, and the
I was able to use it on my 2600's running 12.2(8), and only tried a
handful of commands, which DID work.
Ex:
Router-DAL-GateWay(config)#do ?
LINE Exec Command
Router-DAL-GateWay(config)#do show ?
LINE
Router-DAL-GateWay(config)#do sh ip int brie
InterfaceIP-Address
I think it would be hard to prove that they copied Cisco product.
Otherwise, we can also say AMD copied Intel, Microsoft copied Apple.
Just my thought.
Yoshi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Craig Columbus
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002
I am new to the pix so please verify these entries before you try them
(older version of pix) you need to add conduit statements. This version of
PIX (6.2(2)) may be able to use access lists so check on that prior to
putting in the conduits. Once you have entered the conduit statements clear
I have a pair of 2621's and 2 reduandant ethernet handoffs to my ISP. 1 is a
primary and the other is a backup which should only be used if the primary
fails. On my side i am running HSRP for fault tolerance RA is configured
asprimary in my HSRP group. I will be doing BGP peering with my
I don't think there's anyone in this industry who hasn't reverse engineered
something in order not to pay royalties. Something like EtherChannel comes
to mind. I think DEC originally created hunt-groups for trunking
technologies long before Cisco had EtherChannel. I heard Cisco
reverse-engineered
Ok Craig, you need to gather some more info before you start spreading
piracy rumors. I just talked to the the west coast channel manager for
Huawei, Yes their routers are very similar to cisco, But he assured me that
they in no way reverse-engineered them. They have been designed with the
cisco
Didn't you even bother to read the disclaimer I put in my post?
I didn't start this thread, I'm not the one who said that they had reverse
engineered Cisco's products, I'm not the one who stated that even the
product lines were named the same. I'm not spreading rumors and I
specifically
My frame-relay switch died, so I put 2 1700 routers back-to-back to get
enough interfaces.
I made sure to use the interface type nni between the two 1700, yet it
looks like the two frame-relay switches are not talking to each other.
Anyone try this trick before. This is what I get:
frame2#show
No,
CCNA is very easy compared CCNP except the CCNP(switching), remaining are
not harder than CCNA, requires indepth study ,,,
Sunil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49848t=49829
--
FAQ, list archives, and
I dont have an aux port on this router and I am using windows 2000. Any one
have any other suggestions?
thx
Randy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49850t=49692
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I think they are not in the same class of switches, so a direct comparison
is tough. Here's some thoughts...
- The 2950 is newer, therefore newer ASICs. The VH-2402, aka ELS100 has been
around for about three years.
-The VH is mostly ASIC based where the firmware is only 500k in size. The
2950's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I can't for the life of me remember what the recommended
maximum number of clients on one segment is, I think it was
either 300 or 500.
IP is 500
IPX is 300
AppleTalk is 200
NetBIOS is 200
Mixed is 200
Also, those numbers
I appreciate the response. Basicallly we buy the vh2402 for workgroup
access layer connections. we use no stacking (i heard if you stack 7
vh2402's it takes 18 minutes to boot up..geeze!) or fiber/gig uplinks. we
usually have the 2402's uplinked (over copper) to a 2h252 thats linked to
our 6000
Yes, I didn't read the requirements. If this had been an actual CCIE test
objective, I would have received 0 points.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
David j wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I would added eigrp stub connected on spoke routers (I think you need ios
I don't think stub generate summary routes like it does in OSPF. You still
need to summarize.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
David j wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I would added eigrp stub connected on spoke routers (I think you need ios
12.0) if you don't do that,
wonder if this helps explain why Cisco's stock tanked recently, and is now
around 11 bucks?
much as I'd like to see prices plummet - I lose a good bit of business to
non Cisco solutions these days, with customers watching their dollars - the
spillover here in California would not be pretty, and
I would think you would need a static NAT to allow the security 0 interface
to initiate a coonection to the higher sec interface.
Clayton
John Green wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
two questions here:
first so no static command would be needed ? is that
82 matches
Mail list logo
