Hi!
And 6 interfaces are allowed only in the unrestricted PIX-515(E) version too.
Bye, HT
-Original Message-
From: Quek, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: how to find whether pix is running restricted or
Hi,
The question should be what you want to do with MPLS, so what is the
reason you want to implement MPLS in the first place.
- MPLS VPN's: EIGRP could be used
- Make core BGP free: EIGRP can be used
- MPLS Traffic Engineering: EIGRP can NOT be used, only OSPF/ISIS
For the first 2 you could
Dear Group,
i m facing a piculiar problem. i have 2 cat 6509's switches as CORE
connected back to back. Both the switches has 2 MSFC's (total four) as a
redundent. I have configured HSRP between them and even enabled MLS on both
the switches.
I have followed proper Cisco documentation for
From the SP point of view either use OSPF or ISIS for scalability,
standards and QoS features. For example only these two protocols will
allow you to do traffic engineering with MPLS over your backbone.
From the client point side EIGRP is not one of the protocols to be used
between PE-CE.
Elmer,
The way I read your config. You have enabled a single interface with
EIGRP routing, interface loopback17 of network 192.168.199.0/24.
You are redistributing all of EIGRP into BGP which only includes this
one network.
You are aggregating 192.168.192.0 255.255.248.0. The aggregate address
The 2 remote access books from Cisco will do the trick. I didn't use
Boson and still passed.
Theo
amir tahir
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/30/2002 01:58 PM
Please respond to amir tahir
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:CCNP Remote Access Exam
To announce your loopback interfaces, u can also use redistribute connected
with a route-map to filter which connected you want to redistribute (only
loopbacks) ...
Jim Brown a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmer,
The way I read your config. You have enabled a single
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
I've written some Perl scripts (on a LINUX box) to drive some router
tests. Perl is something I've taught myself, and don't have the
experience with it I do with C.
I got some vague advice from one of our people to write TCL/Expect
and plug that in -- another
I get the exact same thing on my 6506's. However, everything I've found on
Cisco's website leads me to believe this isn't an issue. They haven't
specifically said that, but the MLS troubleshooting doesn't even mention it
(at least not that I've found). Let me know if you find out anything.
Don,
Yes you can view the entire config at once, enter the following first
terminal length 0
Debbie
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Don Claybrook wrote:
Hello.
A customer asked me if I knew of a way to show the running configuration
all
at once, not page-at-a-time (-more-). I have no idea, but
Does anybody know if they anybody is going to distribute voucher for the new
CCDA and CCDP tests coming the next few weeks?
Regards,
Persio
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54538t=54538
--
FAQ, list archives, and
I would suggest that input errors is a general counter for all input
errors and that these are then split down in to more sepcific error types,
in this case CRC. Can anyone confirm this?
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Packet Errors
If you have a
Good morning all. I was wondering if someone could lend me a little help
about engineering OSPF in the backbone for an ISP network. I just had a
couple of questions and hopefully someone can give me some guidanceĀ
or even
some CCO links with some specific examples or better yet any material
[snip]
work, but I may not be able to answer the question correctly on paper.
And,
in my opinion, it's more important to be able to walk the walk than talk
the talk. What do you think?
You make some excellent points. I think it's more than a binary talk
the talk vs. walk the walk, the
Say, for example, that a customer has a small block of IP's and a
distribution router knows where that block is, via a connected route, like
a
/30 on a serial link. But later down the line the customer requests an
additional block of 64 IP addresses, what is the best way to send this
block
Rather than run OSPF to customers, it is generally much better to have
them use a default route to the ISP and for the ISP to run static routes to
the customer. OSPF to the customer is a huge land mine for the ISP and
should be avoided in almost every case.
Don
Chris Headings wrote in
Hi Puro,
Upgrading the Firmware image of a UFM (for that matter any non-redundant)
card will take it kind-of out-of-service, and it won't be available to
perform it's regular operations. So plan the downtime window for this
purpose, in advance.
Regards,
Vikram
puro prasad wrote:
hi all,
At 2:52 AM + 9/30/02, nrf wrote:
Chuck's Long Road wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
hey, friends, I'm always interested in learning something I didn't know
before. not claiming to know a whole lot about MPLS, but in terms of
operation, MPLS operates on top
Hi Ismail,
I think you need to reframe your question. If you ask me Eamp;M is an
interface type, and the numbers of channels would depend upon the line or
trunk on which you are using this interface type. So on a T1 facility
configured with a Eamp;M interface, the facility would be having 24
Well, this is exactly what Doyle has in Vol 2 p.188 where the router
CONFIGURED with thte aggregate-address command shows the more-specific
routes in its BGP table with S entries and to suppress the more-specific
routes you add the no-summary keyword. Doyle's config clearly has the
network
Great...
So it looks like I would then use the redistribute static subnets as well
as the redistribute connected subnets command within the OSPF process to
make sure ALL ospf enabled routers would know how to reach that specifc,
statically routed/connected, destination?
Chris
Message Posted
Dear Persio,
Don't have any idea but if you got any ifo then kindly let me know as well.
Thanks in Advance!
Ahmad
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54549t=54538
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
At 2:58 PM + 9/30/02, Don wrote:
Rather than run OSPF to customers, it is generally much better to have
them use a default route to the ISP and for the ISP to run static routes to
the customer. OSPF to the customer is a huge land mine for the ISP and
should be avoided in almost every case.
I myself have found that if you do a show run in hyperterm, then hit enter a
bunch of times and scroll up, the the scrambling above the window goes away.
It's only between the shaded area and the white box. Once it's all in the
shaded area, it should all be in order. Or you just just use
Analog = 1
Digital = 24
Ismail M Saeed wrote:
All,
Does anyone know how many voice channels the EM interface carry ?
Thanks and best regards
--
Bruce Enders Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chesapeake NetCraftsmeno:(410)-757-3050, c:(443)-994-0678
1290 Bay
Tim Champion wrote:
I would suggest that input errors is a general counter for
all input
errors and that these are then split down in to more sepcific
error types,
in this case CRC. Can anyone confirm this?
Yes, that's right.
Input errors is a general category. On an Ethernet interface,
Check out the groupstudy archives. I replied to a message a few weeks ago
regarding this exam. And whatever you do, don't use Boson. :-)
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: amir tahir [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have an even more fundamental question. ;-) Why does MPLS need a routing
protocol at all? Obviously, the forwarding of traffic doesn't use it.
Forwarding is based on the labels. Is it for the label distribution
component? Couldn't that be done with manual configuration?
Priscilla
nrf wrote:
I'm not sure I'm in complete agreement. The network I work for has several
distribution routers that contain around 1000 T1 speed customers. If we
were to static route each of their networks it would add about 1000 to 1500
lines of router configuration to the router. That would definately add
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Here's another benefit I see from certifications like this:
there are
things that all of us know how to do, but if asked to walk
someone through
it over the phone, couldn't do it. For example, for me it
would be DNS
configuration. I can do it, but I can't tell
Robert Edmonds wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In a large organization, I would recommend OSPF anyway. It's generally
considered to be more scalable the EIGRP.
Well, shyeeet, if you REALLY want scalability in an IGP, then there's only
one answer - ISIS.
Interesting. I don't work for an ISP bt have worked with many and I
have only ran into one that ran an IGP with it's customers and I was
suprised. My ancedotal evidence suggests that the vast majority either
run BGP or statics to announce customer networks. I know there are
plenty of ISP
Haakon Claassen (hclaasse) wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Perhaps the Multi protocol
Is in regards to the fact that it can support multiple routing contexts
(one per vrf)
That's a pretty weak definition of 'multiprotocol'.
More to the point, even if you're
I got an even more fundamental question - why does MPLS require IP at
all?
At the risk of starting a religious way, it's not called Internet
Protocol
Label Switching, it's Multi-protocol label switching. MPLS has
effectively
become a feature of IP, as opposed to a generalized control-plane
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have an even more fundamental question. ;-) Why does MPLS need a routing
protocol at all? Obviously, the forwarding of traffic doesn't use it.
Forwarding is based on the labels. Is it for the label
Mike Bernico wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm not sure I'm in complete agreement. The network I work for has
several
distribution routers that contain around 1000 T1 speed customers. If we
were to static route each of their networks it would add about 1000
Well I work for an ISP, and I would have to say that it depends. For most
customers (i.e. unmanaged) they just get a static route on the edge router
which get redistributed in OSPF. If the customer happends to be in our
managed program, we would then run OSPF to them. But if they happen to be
in
Howard,
Is there an audio tape that goes with the slides. If so, I'd being
willing to
pay so I could show this presentation to my CCNP students, including
the shameless plug. BTW, liked your concise explanation of CIDR
vs VLSM.
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco
Thank You everyone for the valuable input . This has helped me put the issue
in the correct prospective !!!
Cheers
Jaspreet
_
Consultant
Andrew NZ Inc
Box 50 691, Porirua
Wellington 6230, New Zealand
Phone +64 4 238 0723
Fax
I have an even more fundamental question. ;-) Why does MPLS need a routing
protocol at all?
To determine the potential topologies over which end-to-end, and
alternate (e.g., shared risk groups) paths can be established, and
THEN to which labels can be assigned on a node-by-node basis.
Haakon Claassen (hclaasse) wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Perhaps the Multi protocol
Is in regards to the fact that it can support multiple routing contexts
(one per vrf)
That's a pretty weak definition of 'multiprotocol'.
More to the point, even if you're
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Here's another benefit I see from certifications like this:
there are
things that all of us know how to do, but if asked to walk
someone through
it over the phone, couldn't do it. For example, for me it
would be DNS
configuration. I can do it, but I can't
nrf wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
[snip]
And I think this functionality was sadly lost. Not the transport
functionality, but the path-setup functionality. I think more work needs
to
be done on the ATM side of things to make MPLS more palatable to carriers
At 7:11 PM + 9/30/02, nrf wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In a large organization, I would recommend OSPF anyway. It's generally
considered to be more scalable the EIGRP.
Well, shyeeet, if you REALLY want scalability in an IGP, then
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Here's another benefit I see from certifications like this:
there are
things that all of us know how to do, but if asked to walk
someone through
it over the phone, couldn't do it. For example, for me it
would be DNS
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 7:11 PM + 9/30/02, nrf wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In a large organization, I would recommend OSPF anyway. It's
generally
considered to be
The following mail can't be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: look,my beautiful girl friend
The file is the original mail
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54574t=54574
Kent Yu wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
nrf wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
[snip]
And I think this functionality was sadly lost. Not the transport
functionality, but the path-setup functionality. I think more work
needs
Kevin Wigle wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
W2K/XP does that automatically. If you have the icon turned on in the
system tray for the nic, you will see when the cable is unplugged and when
it is plugged in again. (you don't need it turned on to work)
this has
I think if the following situation is explained, it would go a long way to
my sorting out other issues.
Given the config files pasted at the bottom of this message:
NetworkA = 172.29.10.0
NetworkB = 192.168.100.0
NetworkC = 172.29.30.0
RouterA hosts 172.29.10.0 and 192.168.100.0
RouterB
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 7:11 PM + 9/30/02, nrf wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In a large organization, I would recommend OSPF anyway. It's
generally
considered to
i'm sitting in on the routing 901 bsci (new exam) next week...any good
advice or look outs for the exam?? i took the global knowledge course 2
weeks ago and have the older version of the boson routing for exam 603.
should this be suffice. i heard the cisco press routing book is not a very
good
Howard,
Is there an audio tape that goes with the slides. If so, I'd being
willing to
pay so I could show this presentation to my CCNP students, including
the shameless plug. BTW, liked your concise explanation of CIDR
vs VLSM.
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco
Jelly doughnut? I don't get it - I thought he was talking about the Shiite
population in Iran which dominated news a couple decades ago with the rise
of the Ayatollah Khomeini...
A Berliner, er, jelly doughnut sounds a bit tasty, though... JFK sure
thought so - especially in Germany...
Bill
Jelly doughnut? I don't get it - I thought he was talking about the Shiite
population in Iran which dominated news a couple decades ago with the rise
of the Ayatollah Khomeini...
A Berliner, er, jelly doughnut sounds a bit tasty, though... JFK sure
thought so - especially in Germany...
JFK is
I got an even more fundamental question - why does MPLS require IP at
all?
At the risk of starting a religious way, it's not called Internet
Protocol
Label Switching, it's Multi-protocol label switching. MPLS has
effectively
become a feature of IP, as opposed to a generalized
Just thinking what are the best practices to route between vlans. We have 6
vlans at work, the main reason for multiple vlans is to minimize the impact
of Broadcasts. We are running eigrp on the RSM/cat5500. Is this how most
people configure it out there ? Also we are planning to add a seperate
OK, no laughing or flaming, but I have a customer that is all Mac-based.
They are planning to upgrade their e-mail server. Does anyone have any
suggestions for a good e-mail server that will meet these requirements:
Must support SMTP and POP, obviously. No need for IMAP.
Should support about 200
What was the question?
At 08:25 PM 9/30/2002 +, Kohli, Jaspreet wrote:
Thank You everyone for the valuable input . This has helped me put the issue
in the correct prospective !!!
Cheers
Jaspreet
_
Consultant
Andrew NZ Inc
Box 50
It might depend on the address of the device in Amsterdam that you are using
to ping. If the router, then do an extended ping and use the 172.29.30.1 as
the source address. Ping to 192.168.100.15. It should work.
If you are pinging from a workstation or the router using a valid
172.29.30.x
At cisco we run eigrp on the 6509/msfc, setup vlan interfaces and route
between
them. The telephone subnets are just more vlan interfaces that pass dhcp
data to the
phones , just like the data networks.
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems, IT-LAN
JohnZ wrote:
Just thinking what are the best
Hi,
Just want to clarify something. Let say i have middle-size network which all
the switches (around 4) connected together to a router. The backbone of the
network should be the toward the WAN side which is from the router onsward
rite? Or is it the connection from the switch to the router?
Anybody have any ideas ? router tryes to boot, but goes in to rommon
rommon 8 meminfo
Main memory size: 32 MB. Packet memory size: 16 MB
Available main memory starts at 0xa000e000, size 0x1ff2000
Packet memory starts at 0xa800
NVRAM size: 0x2
rommon 9 dir
usage: dir
rommon 10 dir
Does anyone know of a good book (not too big) that cover access list in
detail?
Thanks
Karl
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54592t=54592
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
O'Reilly has a book called Cisco IOS Access Lists. It is 250 pages and
covers a few topics. Basics, Security Policies, Routing Policies, Debugging
Lists, Route Maps etc.. I have read bits and pieces of this book and have
found it to be not a bad book.
Kim
Message Posted at:
Check your flash for crash info files. You can read through these and or
download them to add to your TAC case. You have a memory error and may need
to swap out a stick of memory.
Searching Cache Error Exception 4700 and Cache Parity Exception 4500
separately gives you many links that will
What's your lab setup? I'm studying for the lab too. I have: (1)2610,
(1)2611, (1)2501, (1)2924, and (1)2912.
Keith
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
when you get to the lab, let me know..I am in San Jose and I have a lab
setup...
Cisco Rookie
Have one here with me now that I refer to every now and then. Got it in
2000, so may be a new version of this book now.
Cisco Access Lists, Field Guide
McGraw Hill
Held/Hundley
Isbn: 0-07-212335-4
John
Sydney, Australia
-Original Message-
From: Karl West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I live in Hayward by the way...
Keith wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What's your lab setup? I'm studying for the lab too. I have: (1)2610,
(1)2611, (1)2501, (1)2924, and (1)2912.
Keith
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Thank you
I already swapped memory once, but I will try it again.
Kim Graham wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Check your flash for crash info files. You can read through these and or
download them to add to your TAC case. You have a memory error and may
need
to
Need a study partner in or around Stockton,CA to study for the CCIE RS
Written the the lab. If you around Stockton let me know so we can hook up
and knock this test out.
Cisco_King
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54599t=54599
Jimmy wrote:
Hi,
Just want to clarify something. Let say i have middle-size
network which all
the switches (around 4) connected together to a router. The
backbone of the
network should be the toward the WAN side which is from the
router onsward
rite? Or is it the connection from the
There is a book called Cisco Access Lists Field Guide, by Gilbert Held.
Paperback, 288 pages
I have a copy and it is pretty good. Some of it is a copy'n'paste of CCO (or
vice versa), eg reflexive ACLs.
cheers
Simon Dartford
Design Engineer
Advanced Solutions
Telecom New Zealand
Internet:
I sat this yesterday!
It is a bit differnet, and in my opinion, better.
Better because there is actual router simulation involved. I had to configure
OSPF on one!
I was caught out on IS-IS as I only started to study that at 6am the morning
on the exam. My diligence was rewarded with %20 on
I personally think upgrading to MAC OS X would most definitely offer more
choices.
I use a combination of Postfix and Qpopper (on FreeBSD) both of which I know
will run on MAC OS X.
Communicate PRO is supposed to be an EXCELLENT commercial email server with
SMTP/POP/IMAP capabilities all built
Any know how to simulate a CMTS? I have a few uBR900's in a lab
environment, and would love to use the cable interface. Since I don't
know much about the cable infrastructure, I don't know if I can use the
interfaces without a CMTS (i.e. back to back cable interfaces)
Any suggestions?
Thanks for the feed back...
- Original Message -
From: Simon Dartford
To:
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 10:09 PM
Subject: RE: access list [7:54592]
There is a book called Cisco Access Lists Field Guide, by Gilbert Held.
Paperback, 288 pages
I have a copy and it is pretty
I've been involved in Formal International Standards Bodies, where
the Camel was developed as a functional specification for a Mouse.
The market and the world are far faster than the carriers would like
it to be.
Here I must disagree. The fact is the traditional carriers basically are
Wow, I am the opposite. I use OSPF as much as possible here, mainly due to
the fact I had used it whilst in my early stages of networking. I really
like OSPF and love how it it scales nicely in my networks. I honestly
thought that a large portion of the routing test would be focused on OSPF.
Hey everyone...
I passed MCNS, PIX and VPN last week! Just letting everyone know that this
group is a great learning resource and I use it all the time...it helps!
Thanks!
--
Dain Deutschman
CNA, MCP, CCNA
Data Communications Manager
New Star Sales and Service, Inc.
Message Posted at:
Hi,
Can any one suggest good books/ URL for the Wireless LAN
exam, as the part of Partner Specialization program.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards... Anil
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Message
Dain,
Congrats!
I can see that you are still hitting them!
Congrats!!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54610t=54607
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
Yes.. It is not due to duplex mismatch, as I had fixed both sides to 100
full duplex and if I switch to autodetect, the collision error will appear.
I had patched the cables to other switches ports, but the problem follows.
All the problem PCs are quite near to each other as there are all in the
Hi
Had the same error recently on a 4500. Swapped memory sticks (flash ram)
with the same results. We raised a TAC call with Cisco, and were advised
that the backplane was faulty.
Regards,
John Botha
MCSE, CCNA,CCNP,CCDA,CCDP
CS IT Solutions
Tel: +27 (0) 11 686-6257
Fax: +27 (0) 11 686-6269
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I got an even more fundamental question - why does MPLS require IP
at
snip a bit
I've been involved in Formal International Standards Bodies, where
the Camel was developed as a functional specification for
85 matches
Mail list logo
