RE: 640-604 Switching [7:58384]

2002-12-03 Thread Siddiqi Kenan
I am interested in trading. Please contact me on my e-mail address. Cheers, Kenan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58429&t=58384 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.htm

RE: Monitoring SPF algorithm [7:58408]

2002-12-03 Thread alaerte Vidali
Any Thoughts? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58432&t=58408 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PRO

Re: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread alaerte Vidali
>From my experience the passing score were 70% Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58431&t=58400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosur

Support exam how to prepare [7:58430]

2002-12-03 Thread Siddiqi Kenan
Hi there, First of all, thank you to all of those who helped and guided me for the exam. Passed it. Here is what I learnt from my experience: 1. Passing score was 755, I had 58 questions (but this varies from person to person) 2. The best way I found to prepare for this exam was using the offical

Re: Home lab setup FRAME SWITCH [7:58204]

2002-12-03 Thread Larry Letterman
Yes, your correct... The ones I have at home are 4500 routers with 4700 cpu's... Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 4500 Software (C4500-BOOT-M), Version 11.1(22), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1998 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 28-Sep-98 18:10 by richv Ima

CCIE LAB Preparation - Anyone on same path!! [7:58433]

2002-12-03 Thread kaushik khakhar
Hello @, I have started preparing for my CCIE LAB again (2nd try in Feb). Now the LAB is changed with new additonal switch 3550 and so on. Anyone who is in the same direction, can get in touch to get and share views/inputs. Regards, Kaushik Khakhar A ---

Re: Collision [7:58389]

2002-12-03 Thread Larry Letterman
Most likely the previous 10/half interface on the switch and the router were not linked at the same speed/duplex or the other router had an issue with the setting. To be safe I would set the switch port and the router interface to 100/full or 10/full and there should be no issues then. and yes

RE: QOS on 40003 [7:58412]

2002-12-03 Thread Juan Blanco
Johnman, Based on Cisco Recommendation the following is the baseline for traffic classification Traffic TypeLayer 2 COS Layer 3 IP Precedence Layer 3 DSCP Voice RTP 5 5 EF Voice

Re: Specific BGP Question [7:58428]

2002-12-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HI Jim, Part 1: I guess the filter list take priority over the route-map as they are the first to be listed in "sh run" config. part 2: Yes Map1 and Map2 are valid as the cond adv. feature use the general terms route-map and this includes all types of filter lists. But why you want to use access l

RE: Regarding Router rental business? [7:58422]

2002-12-03 Thread Ellis, Andrew
Guys, the spelling is getting terrible. Even painful to read. -Original Message- From: wma2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Regarding Router rental business? [7:58422] Hi guys: I and my freind just got tones of C

RE: QOS on 40003 [7:58412]

2002-12-03 Thread Juan Blanco
Johnman, Based on Cisco Recommendation the following is the baseline for traffic classification Traffic TypeLayer 2 COS Layer 3 IP Precedence Layer 3 DSCP Voice RTP 5 5 EF Voice

RE: AS 5400 lost carrier [7:58361]

2002-12-03 Thread John Botha
Hi We have had similar problems with different routers acting as NAS dialup servers. The main reasons for disconnected carrier on modems: - The router not earthed properly in the cabinet - The "mica modem " command - if you are using mica modems, of course. Hope it helps :) Regards, John Botha

Re: I seems Confused.....Peer-to-to TCP/IP Network [7:58255]

2002-12-03 Thread Godswill Oletu
Hi Mark and All! This is to thank everyone who responded or think through my question but could not response. I have been able to resolve the problem. Actually, I install Checkpoint NG on the Windows NT 4.0 system for my home lab but had not being using it. So I completely forgot that its securi

Re: RE: Regarding Router rental business? [7:58422]

2002-12-03 Thread B.J. Wilson
> Guys, the spelling is getting terrible. Even painful to read. Agreed. The three R's are *not* "readin', routin', and 'rithmetic." ;-) BJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58442&t=58422 -- FAQ, list archives, an

Re: Specific BGP Question [7:58428]

2002-12-03 Thread Peter van Oene
Hi Jim, Some thoughts inline. On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 02:16, Jim Devane wrote: > Hello all, > > Long time lurker, first time poster. > > I have a router that is multi-homed between 16631 and 701. > I have a new client who is buying transit from us. > They are multi-homed to us and 1239. > A bu

RE: configure spanning tree mode [7:58365]

2002-12-03 Thread Brett
Which Sup.Eng. are you using in the 4006? The 4xxx does 802.1Q, not ISL, so that may be a problem. b. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of puro prasad Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: configure spanning t

ntp stateless packet [7:58446]

2002-12-03 Thread John Tafasi
Hi group, Below is the output of debug ntp packets on my router. It show that the router is sending ntp stateless packets. Why is that? What it means? When will the router send stateless packet? Dec 2 22:43:12.909: NTP: rcv packet from 10.10.10.2: Dec 2 22:43:12.909: leap 0, mode 3, version

Need a solution [7:58447]

2002-12-03 Thread Guruprasad Sanjeevi
Hi group, Howdy? I have my branch office located in India and our headquarters in US .The offices are connected via 512kbps IPLC. These offices have their own separate Internet links. Now we are opening one more office in India. We need a solution like this...

for PIX VPN gurus... [7:58448]

2002-12-03 Thread Edward Sohn
I have a requirement in which a single Headquarters PIX needs to VPN over the internet to a single remote site which have two separate PIXes (connected the same site LAN). The goal is to introduce redundancy into the VPN connection to the remote site. Unfortunately, it has to be like this due to

RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread Bernard
Cisco is using a sliding scale based on overall failure rate of the exam. As of 10/19, you needed a 58% to pass, not the 70% . The required % to pass will change over time, again based on failure rate. This exam is much more doable now. It is not as scary as it used to be at 70%. Bernard >

Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]

2002-12-03 Thread Tunde Kalejaiye
hi, i upgraded my acs 2.6 to a 3.0 when i read ur mail in reference to changing user passwords. i cant seem to get this working...i cant find attributes 17 and 21 in the acs configuration. any info is highly appreciated. thanks - Original Message - From: "Elijah Savage III" To: Sent: Tu

Re: RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread B.J. Wilson
I would think that this would be a bad thing, for two reasons: one, the number of people who put "CCIE Written" on their resumes will increase, and the availability of lab dates will decrease. US$0.02, BJ ---Original Message--- From: Bernard Sent: 12/03/02 11:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Question on CCIE lab equipment? [7:58414]

2002-12-03 Thread bill cisco-guy
Would be nice to know but I doubt you will get a answer since you then know what they can and can't test on. Only one for sure is token ring. They said no token ring after nov 4 so why would they have a interface What is even more of a issue is that they took out the 2500's Now they can test all t

Configuring A digi portserver for cisco anyone!!! [7:58453]

2002-12-03 Thread Matt
Does anybody have an idea on how to configure a digi portserver (terminal) so i can connect through it to my cisco routers. I have set up an ip address of 10.0.0.1 for the terminal server and can log in no problem whatsoever,however, Whilst i am in the root mode i cannot reverse telnet to any of th

OSPF E1 or E2 [7:58454]

2002-12-03 Thread p b
One of the cisco press books indicates one should use type 1 externals when the route is being advertised by >1 ASBR and type 2 externals when there's a single ASBR. Are there any issues if one uses type 1 external even when the route is being advertised by a single ASBR? It would seem useful,

RE: for PIX VPN gurus... [7:58448]

2002-12-03 Thread Roberts, Larry
Taking a guess, but could you specify multiple destination IP's under the crypto map peer statement? PIX#(config) crypto map TEST 10 set peer 10.20.30.1 10.20.30.2 PIX#(config) show crypto map Crypto Map: "TEST" interfaces: { } Crypto Map "TEST" 10 ipsec-isakmp Peer = 10.20.30.1

RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread קורן לב
Someone should say this already : There is no experties-checking in any ccie written exam! The ccie is a rip-off! 50% memory questions (like "what vip version is eprom-value:01e00" and other shit.." I got the "official exam certification guide" I am a ccip/ccdp/ccnp and I never got so miss-leaded!

Ccie is a rip off! [7:58458]

2002-12-03 Thread קורן לב
Someone should say this already : There is no experties-checking in any ccie written exam! The ccie is a rip-off! 50% memory questions (like "what vip version is eprom-value:01e00" and other shit.." I got the "official exam certification guide" I am a ccip/ccdp/ccnp and I never got so miss-leaded!

CCIE written [7:58457]

2002-12-03 Thread קורן לב
Someone should say this already : There is no experties-checking in any ccie written exam! The ccie is a rip-off! 50% memory questions (like "what vip version is eprom-value:01e00" and other shit.." I got the "official exam certification guide" I am a ccip/ccdp/ccnp and I never got so miss-leade

RE: RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1
They better not be putting CCIE written, see point 2 below... I posted this in a thread on the jobs@groupstudy list - straight from the source: Discussion Thread Response (Marisol) 11/21/2002 08:50 AM Dear Bill: Thank you for your patience. 1) When using the logos for business cards or signat

Re: configure spanning tree mode [7:58365]

2002-12-03 Thread MADMAN
the 4000 with a SUPIII will allow ISL. Dave Brett wrote: > > Which Sup.Eng. are you using in the 4006? The 4xxx does 802.1Q, not > ISL, so that may be a problem. > > b. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > puro prasad > Sent: Sun

RE: for PIX VPN gurus... [7:58448]

2002-12-03 Thread Daniel Cotts
A diagram would help. I'm visualizing the remote site as having one Internet connection. The gateway router's inside interface connects to a hub/switch. The outside interfaces of the two 506s connect to this hub/switch. The inside interfaces of the 506s connect to a second (common) hub/switch which

PPP events [7:58462]

2002-12-03 Thread wolfgang klages
Group, Couple of PPP questions... [1] I'm looking at the debug output of a PPP negotiation on a Cisco router. The router receives a CONFREQ in the 'Closed' state. RFC1661 specifies that the router should reply with a Terminate-Ack. However, the router replies with a CONFREQ of its own. The router

Re: rate-limit question [7:58423]

2002-12-03 Thread Mariusz T.
U?ytkownik ""William Lijewski"" napisa3 w wiadomo6ci [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > For rate-limit, is there a default "exceed-action" ? I have been looking in > the documents and all of the configs I seem to find all have the > "exceed-action drop", what I am wondering is what ha

Re: Question on CCIE lab equipment? [7:58414]

2002-12-03 Thread nrf
""bill cisco-guy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Would be nice to know but I doubt you will get a answer since you > then know what they can and can't test on. > Only one for sure is token ring. > They said no token ring after nov 4 so why would they have a interf

Re: Ccie is a rip off! [7:58458]

2002-12-03 Thread Johnny Routin
Sorry the CCIE cert is not the easy paper cert like the other certs you have. If you can't handle it then go get msce instead. JR -- Johnny Routin ""wexo la"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Someone should say this already : > There is no experties-checking i

Re: OSPF E1 or E2 [7:58454]

2002-12-03 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 5:00 PM + 12/3/02, p b wrote: >One of the cisco press books indicates one should use >type 1 externals when the route is being advertised by >>1 ASBR and type 2 externals when there's a single >ASBR. This is just plain wrong. The reason you have E1 and E2 is to have different routing polic

RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]

2002-12-03 Thread Elijah Savage III
Exactly what capacity are you using the Radius box in? I use my radius box with a Cisco 3030 concentrator all users logging in via vpn are authenticated against the concentrator. There is nothing special you have to do on the radius box to allow for changing of passwords upon expiration, but on the

TEST Off topic!!!! [7:58468]

2002-12-03 Thread Elijah Savage III
Is there something going on with groupstudy mail server I notice last night mail was queueing up on my mailserver, and I have set 3 messages within the last 24 hours that has not shown up on the board. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58468&t=58468 --

Re: OSPF E1 or E2 [7:58454]

2002-12-03 Thread p b
Comments inline: Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > > At 5:00 PM + 12/3/02, p b wrote: > >One of the cisco press books indicates one should use > >type 1 externals when the route is being advertised by > >>1 ASBR and type 2 externals when there's a single > >ASBR. > > This is just plain wrong. The

RE: Ccie is a rip off! [7:58458]

2002-12-03 Thread Mirza, Timur
btw, to add what "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" said, the bruno text is practically irrelevant when it comes to the written -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ccie is a rip off! [7:58458] Someo

RE: Home lab setup FRAME SWITCH [7:58204]

2002-12-03 Thread Elijah Savage III
The 4000 will support the interfaces but it has to be a 4000M+. r2#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 4000 Software (C4000-D-M), Version 12.1(16), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 09-Jul-02 05:56 by kellythw Image text-bas

RE: Home lab setup FRAME SWITCH [7:58204]

2002-12-03 Thread Elijah Savage III
Are you sure about this I can't find anything on CCO where these modules are not supported on the 4000 I also know someone right now who has 2 of the NP 4T modules in a 4000M and using it as a frame switch for his lab. -Original Message- From: J.D. Chaiken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: rate-limit question [7:58423]

2002-12-03 Thread Dale
What is the best way to rate-limit a subnet on a 3640 (IOS 12.2) ? I've tried the following with no success: rate-limit input access-group 151 128000 8000 256000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop rate-limit output access-group 150 128000 8000 256000 conform-action transmit exceed-action d

Re: Ccie is a rip off! [7:58458]

2002-12-03 Thread Peter van Oene
Sorry, are you flaming the Cisco test, or some book? On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 12:11, W'WW(W WW wrote: > Someone should say this already : > There is no experties-checking in any ccie written exam! > The ccie is a rip-off! > 50% memory questions (like "what vip version is eprom-value:01e00" and

RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread Steve Dispensa
I must admit that I was surprised to see so many product questions on my last CCIE recert (security). I was expecting difficult technical questions and (relatively) easy product questions, and I got the reverse - the technical questions were simple, and the product questions were surprisingly deta

Help needed on ISDN PPP Multilink [7:58474]

2002-12-03 Thread Leo Song
Hi, friends. I have one ISDN issue which make me quite headache, ok, I can call each channel up (through dialer map or isdn call interface command) separately without problem, which the problem is when I try to leverage PPP multilink to bundle two channels in case of load-threshold events was fire

Re: OSPF E1 or E2 [7:58454]

2002-12-03 Thread Peter van Oene
Some thoughts below On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 13:26, p b wrote: > Comments inline: > > Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > > > > At 5:00 PM + 12/3/02, p b wrote: > > >One of the cisco press books indicates one should use > > >type 1 externals when the route is being advertised by > > >>1 ASBR and type

RE: Arp table - very strange [7:58404]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
The 2950 is a switch, i.e a Layer-2 device. For its normal operations, it doesn't care about ARP, which maps L3 to L2 addresses. So to troubleshoot your problem, consider what the switch is doing that is related to Layer 3 and above. Does it do network management, ping, Telnet? What does the swit

Re: RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
B.J. Wilson wrote: > > I would think that this would be a bad thing, for two reasons: > one, the number of people who put "CCIE Written" on their > resumes will increase, and the availability of lab dates will > decrease. I don't think the lower passing score means more people pass. The test is h

Re: OSPF E1 or E2 [7:58454]

2002-12-03 Thread p b
Sorry. Wasn't trying to suggest Howard was wrong, just providing the source of where I read the information. Everything Howard mentions makes sense. But when there's a single ASBR, it seems that there's no difference in E1 or E2 other than E1 give ya the cost to the external for free. I'm plann

Re: Collision [7:58389]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Larry Letterman wrote: > > Most likely the previous 10/half interface on the switch and > the router > were not > linked at the same speed/duplex or the other router had an > issue with > the setting. No, the switch and router were set to the same thing, which was 10 Mbps half duplex, if you read

Re: Specific BGP Question [7:58428]

2002-12-03 Thread Kent Yu
Jim, I assume your customer is okay with your business decision? People normally want to get to the destinations through the shortest AS path, who you are peering with and who you are buying transit from are important to your customers. I guess it is your customer's business decision, they want t

Re: Ccie is a rip off! [7:58458]

2002-12-03 Thread George Bethel
The CCIE written is not a certification, it is a qualification exam. No matter how dificult you think it is, if you can't pass the written you're not ready for the lab. --- wexo__la wrote: > Someone should say this already : > There is no experties-checking in any ccie written > exam! > The

RE: RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread Mirza, Timur
i can attest to that...i passed w/o a prob 3 yrs ago & failed on the new written...its a night & day difference...when they lower the pass mark from 70% to 58%, it should make you think! -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2

Re: Collision [7:58389]

2002-12-03 Thread Larry Letterman
set one end to 100 half and the other to 100 full and see what happens:) Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >Larry Letterman wrote: > >>Most likely the previous 10/half interface on the switch and >>the router >>were not >>linked at the same speed/duplex or the other router had an >>issue with >>th

RE: Support exam how to prepare [7:58430]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Congratulations on passing the Support exam. For those of you who haven't passed it yet, I have a free practice Support test at my Troubleshooting Networks Web site, which is the companion site for my Support book, Troubleshooting Campus Networks. The Web site has other free resources too, some o

Re: Ccie is a rip off! [7:58458]

2002-12-03 Thread Silju Pillai
The book was released as per the old test. So there is no point in blaming the book. Atleast give some credit to the author for releasing the book. He might have spend nights writing the chapters.Its a good book to start with. Also you cannot expect the whole topic to cover in one single book. Its

RE: RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread Bernard
Priscilla, "more doable" & "less scary" refers to the same exam (new format) at different passing scores. I did not mean to compare the new format and the old format. The new CCIE written exam with 58% as the passing score is "more doable" & "less scary" than the same new CCIE written exam with 7

Re: Collision [7:58389]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Larry Letterman wrote: > > set one end to 100 half and the other to 100 full and see what > happens:) I mentioned the duplex mismatch problem too, but it has nothing to do with his question or problem. The key to troubleshooting is to address the actual problem, not some assumption you make

RE: RE: CCIE written [7:58400]

2002-12-03 Thread Peter van Oene
I've noticed however that the lab itself isn't booked heavily (I could be wrong) If the pool isn't full, turn on the hose and fill it up. Training down your qualification requirements accomplishes that as far as I see it. On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 16:19, Bernard wrote: > Priscilla, > > "more doab

RE: rate-limit question [7:58423]

2002-12-03 Thread William Lijewski
Well its actually a config at work that our ISP put on the router. It is: rate-limit 16000 8000 8000 conform-action set-prec-transmit 2 This is on our 256k link and we are having complaints that the line has performance issues. What I get out of this line is that anything in the 1st 24k or band

RE: AW: Port Security on 3550 based on given MAC-Addre [7:58339]

2002-12-03 Thread William Lijewski
Hello, The default for the maximum number of mac-addresses is one, and the default violation is shutdown. Bill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58490&t=58339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.

RE: for PIX VPN gurus... [7:58448]

2002-12-03 Thread Edward Sohn
Larry, Good find, however, we are GRE tunneling EIGRP across sites. This is before the PIXes. Thanks, Ed --- "Roberts, Larry" wrote: > Taking a guess, but could you specify multiple > destination IP's under the > crypto map peer statement? > > PIX#(config) crypto map TEST 10 set peer 10.20.3

RE: Help needed on ISDN PPP Multilink [7:58474]

2002-12-03 Thread William Lijewski
Can you past the config from the other side also? That would help. Bill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58492&t=58474 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report m

Enterprise technologies [7:58493]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
I may be starting a new project doing some writing about technologies used in enterprise networks. (read not service provider) Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs that use this? How about MPLS? I should discuss it briefly, but aren't the main users of MPLS ISPs, not enterprise networks

RE: Help needed on ISDN PPP Multilink [7:58474]

2002-12-03 Thread Leo Song
Thanks. The calling router config. isdn switch-type basic-ni interface BRI0 bandwidth 128 ip address 10.10.191.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer map ip 10.10.191.2 name dslvanrt3 916046874636 dialer map ip 10.10.191.2 name dslvanrt3 916046874630 dialer load-threshold 5 either diale

Re: configure spanning tree mode [7:58365]

2002-12-03 Thread puro prasad
Enabling spanning tree is ok, but how about changing the mode. As u musst be aware of, cisco supports 3 different spanning tree modes. common spannig tree(cst, IEEE standard), per vlan spanning tree(pvst, cisco proprietary) and pvst+(cisco proprietary interoperable with cst). Are these modes config

MRTG related [7:58497]

2002-12-03 Thread puro prasad
I am running mrtg to monitor one of my ethernet ports on the router. Since a few days, the utilization shown has raised 4fold though no major changes have been carried out on the intranet. Anybody aware of any such problem. regs., prasad. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php

Secondary IP Addresses [7:58498]

2002-12-03 Thread Edward Sohn
Thanks to all for the responses to my VPN connections. I have pretty much verified it will work in an "active/failover" setting... Now, I have an issue where I need to convince my customer that it's better to subinterface a fast ethernet port into two separate VLANs rather than add secondary IP a

Re: Collision [7:58389]

2002-12-03 Thread Larry Letterman
Not the last word, but you imply that the collisions are only due to capacity... and I can have the wrong match on both ends and get plenty of collisions with no capacity issue.and I reserve the last word as always for you...where have you been lately, I have missed you :) Priscilla O

Dialer profiles and broadcast [7:58500]

2002-12-03 Thread John Tafasi
I am using dialer profiles on r2 below and wants protocol broadcast such as rip to be sent out accross the isdn link to r5. I tried to find the command that allows me to configure broadcast but dialer interfaces do not accept the dialer map command. Does any body of you know? hostname r2 ! interf

RE: I seems Confused.....Peer-to-to TCP/IP Network [7:58255]

2002-12-03 Thread Symon Thurlow
That is really funny. -Original Message- From: Godswill Oletu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 14:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: I seems Confused.Peer-to-to TCP/IP Network [7:58255] Hi Mark and All! This is to thank everyone who responded or think through my

Re: Collision [7:58389]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Larry Letterman wrote: > > Not the last word, but you imply that the collisions are only > due to > capacity... > and I can have the wrong match on both ends and get plenty of > collisions > with no > capacity issue. It is a capcity issue. A collision results when the station set to half dupl

Re: Secondary IP Addresses [7:58498]

2002-12-03 Thread Darren S. Crawford
Secondarys will really hurt you in a DHCP environment. The workstations on the secondary subnet will get their DHCP request forwarded with a source segment of the initial IP address on the interface. This was good ammo for me when I was in the same boat. HTH Darren At 10:52 PM 12/3/2002 +,

RE: Dialer profiles and broadcast [7:58504]

2002-12-03 Thread Brian McGahan
John, When using dialer profiles, dialer interfaces are point-to-point, therefore there is no need for protocol mappings. IP broadcast should not have any trouble being sent across the interface. Dialer maps are only used on dialer interface when using rotary groups. Dialer profiles are f

RE: Collision [7:58389]

2002-12-03 Thread Symon Thurlow
Actually, I disagree with a comment made way down in this email!!!: One fix to the problem is to increase the capacity. >>> >>By jumping >> >>>10-fold from 10 Mbps to 100 Mbps, the risk of collisions, >>> >>especially >> >>>excessive collisions, goes way down. Since each frame takes >>> >>1/10th t

Re: Enterprise technologies [7:58493]

2002-12-03 Thread dre
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote > I may be starting a new project doing some writing about > technologies used in enterprise networks. (read not service > provider) > > Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs that use this? I've never seen IS-IS in Enterprise networks, only ISP backbones a

Re: Secondary IP Addresses [7:58498]

2002-12-03 Thread p b
Actually using secondaries and DHCP should be a non issue with any reasonable DHCP server platform. As you mention, in many versions of IOS the interface's primary IP address is used as the DHCP giaddr. If an interface has multiple secondaries, one just needs to configure the DHCP server to be a

Re: CCIE LAB Preparation - Anyone on same path!! [7:58433]

2002-12-03 Thread unload
""kaushik khakhar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello @, > > I have started preparing for my CCIE LAB again (2nd try in Feb). Now the > LAB is changed with new additonal switch 3550 and so on. > > Anyone who is in the same direction, can get in touch to get and

Visio Stencil for Cisco [7:58509]

2002-12-03 Thread Steiven Poh-\(Jaring MailBox\)
Dear All, I can't remember where the url to download the Cisco Visio Stencil that I have done before, can anyone please recall and let me know, Thanks in advance :) Rgds, Steiven Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58509&t=58509 -

OSPF forwarding address and route servers [7:58510]

2002-12-03 Thread p b
Reading (yawn) RFC 2328 and there's mention of two uses of the forwarding address in external LSAs (section 2.3). The second use is where one makes an OSPF router a route server and it generates external LSAs with the forwarding address in each LSA set to the proper AS exit point IP. I guess the

Re: Enterprise technologies [7:58493]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Thanks so much dre! Regarding GARP, someone said I had to cover it, but didn't explain why or even what it is. It seems to mean more than one thing: Generic Attribute Registration Protocol and Group Address Resolution Protocol I'm assuming they meant the second one and that the second GARP is

RE: MRTG related [7:58497]

2002-12-03 Thread Kevin Stone
Check that MRTG is still connecting to the router. If MRTG loses connectivity it will continue to use the last number it had. If this was during a peak it would look like the utilization had jumped up. It could also simply be increased usage. -Kevin > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL

Re: Secondary IP Addresses [7:58498]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
p b wrote: > > > Actually using secondaries and DHCP should be a non issue with > any reasonable DHCP server platform. As you mention, in many > versions of IOS the interface's primary IP address is used > as the DHCP giaddr. If an interface has multiple secondaries, > one just needs to config

RE: Secondary IP Addresses [7:58498]

2002-12-03 Thread Roberts, Larry
How do you handle when the DHCP server is on the same subnet as the FE with multiple sub-interfaces ? The router never even gets to touch the packet and therefore the Server doesn't know to assign IP's from the secondary scope. Or at least that has been my experience. Im not going to touch the rea

NTP: Synchronization problem [7:58515]

2002-12-03 Thread John Tafasi
Hi group, I have r2 (ntp server) and r5 (ntp client) exchnaging (or supposed to) ntp information accross an isdn link. r2 is configured to broadcast ntp packets via its bri0 interface and is doing so sucessfully. r5 is receiving the ntp packets but the "debug ntp packets" on r5 does not produce an

Re: Visio Stencil for Cisco [7:58509]

2002-12-03 Thread NetEng
""Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear All, > > I can't remember where the url to download the Cisco Visio Stencil that I > have > done before, > can anyone please recall and let me know, Thanks in advance :) > > Rgds, > Steiven

RE: Visio Stencil for Cisco [7:58509]

2002-12-03 Thread tu do
I found a set of them. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/503/2.html cheer, Tu Do Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58517&t=58509 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

Re: Synchronization problem [7:58515]

2002-12-03 Thread rcblock
Looks like you are missing "ntp server ip address" global config command on r5. That's why there are not any associations on r5. ""John Tafasi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi group, > > I have r2 (ntp server) and r5 (ntp client) exchnaging (or supposed to) n

RE: Collision [7:58389]

2002-12-03 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sending a frame of any size on 100 Mbps requires a node to use the medium for 1/10 the time it would use it on 10 Mbps. This reduces contention for the medium. Whether this reduces collisions depends on the sending patterns of the nodes. They could all send at the same time anyway, but that doesn'

Re: Regarding Router rental business? [7:58422]

2002-12-03 Thread Tom Lisa
dey shore r et r cologe! Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy "Cunctando restituit rem" "B.J. Wilson" wrote: > Guys, the spelling is getting terrible. Even painful to read. Agreed. The three R's are *not* "readin', routin', and

NAT over virtual template [7:58521]

2002-12-03 Thread pauldongso
Hi, Is it valid to configure virtual template as the NAT inside source? Thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58521&t=58521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco

Re: Synchronization problem [7:58515]

2002-12-03 Thread John Tafasi
I am expecting that r5 will synchronize to the broadcast heared from r2. That is why I did not configure the command "ntp server". ""rcblock"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Looks like you are missing "ntp server ip address" global config command on > r5. That's

Re: Synchronization problem [7:58515]

2002-12-03 Thread John Tafasi
I just need to add something to what i said below; once you configure clients with the ip address of the ntp server, the server does not need to broadcast ""John Tafasi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am expecting that r5 will synchronize to the broadcast heare

RE: MRTG related [7:58497]

2002-12-03 Thread Mark Smith
Kevin's right. The perl process stopped running (evidently at a high traffic time on the firewall) on the Linux box I've got MRTG running on over a weekend. I got a steady high traffic flat line over a weekend during which time use is usually low. Scratched my head on that one for a little while u

Serial Ports [7:58525]

2002-12-03 Thread nilesh bothra
I have 4 serial ports on my home pc which are connected to 4 router console ports through windows hyperterminal software. I dont have any slots left either to install additional serial cards. Is there any way I can use the USB ports to connect to the console ports (In that case how will hyperterm

Re: rate-limit question [7:58423]

2002-12-03 Thread pauldongso
Willia, By default, CAR is disabled. If you want to enable CAR, you are not allowed to complete the command without exceed-action explicitly defined. So your question is not valid in some ways. Regards, Paul William Lijewski wrote: > For rate-limit, is there a default "exceed-action" ? I hav

Re: Specific BGP Question [7:58428]

2002-12-03 Thread YASSER ALY
Jim, I am confused here on what u are trying to accomplish. If your target is to make downstream traffic of your client to enter your AS through the 16631 rather than the 701, then what u need to do is prepend the routes received from your client using your AS many times before advertising them i

RE: Serial Ports [7:58525]

2002-12-03 Thread Silju Pillai
You can use USB port. But you need to buy an USB to Serial converter cable along with the driver software. It will appear as COM port in the hyperterminal software. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58528&t=58525 -- FA

  1   2   >