Hi,
I was wondering whether it's worth reading the new Cisco Catalyst QoS IOS
book whilst revising for the CCIE theory or even perhaps the practical exams.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7522
The SFM is a piece of junk...and not as useful as you might seem...
The new Supervisor 720 has the SFM built-in...which greatly enhances its
use..
-Original Message-
From: neil K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst
com
Phone: 260-625-3273
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of neil
K
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 4:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 6500 Architecture [7:74460]
Folks,
The Catalyst 6500 uses a Shared bus Architecture and to inc
The SFM is a piece of junk...and not as useful as you might seem...
The new Supervisor 720 has the SFM built-in...which greatly enhances its
use..
-Original Message-
From: neil K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst
Folks,
The Catalyst 6500 uses a Shared bus Architecture and to increase the
Backplane capacity you have to have Switch fabric module (SFM) with fabric
Enabled modules to make it work. Is there a vendor which has a better
architecture or a better solution.
Thanks,
neil K.
Message Posted at
Hi,
I have some 4506 (Sup IV module with enhanced L3 IOS) on the network and I
want to purchase spare modules and chasis for them.
My question is "do I have to purchase IOS for the spare supervisor engine
modules"?
I feel I need to purchase IOS for only the ones active/installed on the
network but
Checkpoint,
Is this what you want? (should be inthere somewhere?)
Catalyst 5000 Series Supervisor Engine III G Installation and Configuration
Note
Product Numbers:
WS-X5550(=) Supervisor Engine III G without Uplink Module
Catalyst 5000 Family Supervisor Engine III and Uplink Module
try pinging all the other servers etc
??
>
> Justin :)
>
>
> At 01:37 AM 8/5/2003 +, Firesox wrote:
> >I have Old Catalyst 3512 clustered in one closet and just rolling out XP
> >workstations.
> >I have no problem loging into Windows 2000 Active directory with Win
&
Hey Peeps,
Does anyone know the part number for a Sup IIIF card for a Cat5500?? I've
searched around and can't find it!
Thanks
Stevo
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73948&t=73948
--
**Please support GroupStudy
/2003 +, Firesox wrote:
>I have Old Catalyst 3512 clustered in one closet and just rolling out XP
>workstations.
>I have no problem loging into Windows 2000 Active directory with Win
>98&2000.
>I also don't have any problems loging into 2K AD with any client(98,2000,XP)
&g
I have Old Catalyst 3512 clustered in one closet and just rolling out XP
workstations.
I have no problem loging into Windows 2000 Active directory with Win
98&2000.
I also don't have any problems loging into 2K AD with any client(98,2000,XP)
where I have 2950 or 3550 switches.
For some
;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Reimer, Fred
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
>
>
> They do
replying to this message. If you are not the
named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23,
Is there any particular symptom for this?. I am going install lots of
2950
48 EA switch to a mix off old and new NIC.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:58 AM
Subject: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
[s
to this message. If you are not the
named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23,
I've seen the issue on 3550 switches as well. My case was of a lesser degree
though; the customer had a few machines with the problem (mainly laptops
with older 3com pc cards).
The problem was resolved with 10hal/10half hard coded on the port/machine
pair.
Some clients may display this behavior w
Is there any particular symptom for this?. I am going install lots of
2950
48 EA switch to a mix off old and new NIC.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:58 AM
Subject: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
[s
Hi,
Is there any particular symptom for this?. I am going install lots of 2950
48 EA switch to a mix off old and new NIC.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:58 AM
Subject: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:7282
the author by replying to this message. If you are not the
named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: W
you are not the named
> recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
> or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, Ju
;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Reimer, Fred
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
>
>
> They do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Reimer, Fred
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
>
>
> They don't happen to be autonegotiation issues, do they? Ci
red [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
"I never recommend hard-coding 100/Full on newer switches like
the 2950 and 6500. It might work but you're just asking for problems.
Wi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
"I never recommend hard-coding 100/Full on newer switches like
the 2950 and 6500. It might work but you're just asking for problems.
With the majority of the NICs in our PCs, if you hardset both sides to
10
John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
Actually, Fred, the problem is that some NICs will check for an
autonegotiating partner even if they are hard
Believe me, Chuck, I've harped on our LAN people about this forever and they
finally have made great progress in that area. Today's problems arise from
some P133s with 10baseT ISA cards in them. With previous versions of the
2950 IOS we'd hardset the ports to 10/half and then reboot the PC about fi
replying to this message. If you are not the
named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23,
to this message. If you are not the
named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23,
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
All those who consider any version of this platform beware. As far as
I
can
tell there are no reliable softwa
lazy boy. upgrade your NIC drivers. :->
NIC problems with Cisco switches have been issues for several years that I
can think of. ;->
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All those who consider any version of this platform beware. As far as I
can
> tell there are no reliab
this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil? [7:72821]
All those who consider any version of this
All those who consider any version of this platform beware. As far as I can
tell there are no reliable software versions for this switch that do not
suffer from connectivity bugs. We thought 12.1(13)EA1b solved our problems
so we started rolling out this version. Upon reloading we have a number of
I'm not entirely certain SuperStack III's can be managed in this fashion?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72795&t=72654
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
Chris,
Since you are choosing the link based on MAC addresses and only one
switch LED is blinking, is your test traffic to stations located across
a router? The router will obviously have a single MAC address, so
EtherChannel based on MACs will use only a single link. Perhaps you
should change
BlankHello All ,
we have a cisco 2950 series and a 3com SuperStack III switch in our site .
we have already connect our catalyst to a cisco 3660 router via dot1Q
encapsulation to make VLANs on our switch . now we want to add our 3com
switch to this vlan and cascade it via the catalyst trunk
:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How do I check if load balancing works ? Catalyst 2900 and
[7:72601]
Hi everybody
I have a Compaq server with 2 NC3121 cards. According with the docs, the
card supports Fast Etherchannel static configuration (ON). I couldn't
find a procedure to set up
Hi everybody
I have a Compaq server with 2 NC3121 cards. According with the docs, the
card supports Fast Etherchannel
static configuration (ON).
I couldn't find a procedure to set up Fast Etherchannel for the network card
so I did what I thought it was better.
I selected the following :
Teaming
aning
towards the SUP II+.. From everything I read it has the same QOS and per
port filtering as the SUP IV..
Thanks,
John A. Johns
-Original Message-
From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 3:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Catalyst 4506 - Which Super
""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> With the Sup IV, you could use the 4507R chassis and have the ability to
> use redundant supervisors in the future. I think the switching speed of
> the Sup IV is faster and you can do L3 as well. Things the Sup II can't
> do.
Uh, I th
With the Sup IV, you could use the 4507R chassis and have the ability to
use redundant supervisors in the future. I think the switching speed of
the Sup IV is faster and you can do L3 as well. Things the Sup II can't
do.
>>> "Johns, John A." 07/11/03 12:14PM >>>
Wanted to get some feedback from
Wanted to get some feedback from some folks that are using either the Sup
II+ card or the Sup IV card..
There is over a $3,000.00 difference in cost..
Anybody using the SUP II+? Any issues?
Thanks,
John A. Johns, CCIE No. 7983, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE, MCSA, MCP+I, CCA, A+
System Engineer
The Hill
those commands are only there after you enable aaa new model.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2003 18:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco catalyst 3548 and Radius [7:71991]
Hi all,
I am configuring Radius on a cat 3548 and I do not have
Robert,
Kind of annoying isn't it? I looked a while ago and the short answer was
it's not there and you can't do it. Some quick checking on Cisco's site
showed that they might finally have released it in newer code though:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps637/prod_relea
Hi all,
I am configuring Radius on a cat 3548 and I do not have the global config
"radius" command available. Anyone know what the commands ought to be to
create a server, key, etc.. Normally it is Radius-server key, radius-server
host.. Can't figure it out..
I have IOS 12.0(5.2)XU
Messa
s vermill wrote:
> When I went to the Software Advisor on CCO, IGMP Snooping didn't show up as
> a supported option for the 3550. Did your sales team lead you astray? I'd
> take them to task if they did...
The 3550 does support IGMP snooping, since 12.1(4)EA1.
See
http://www.cisco.com/univerc
ounds as if your hardware is new. Can you open a TAC case?
>
>
> Thank you again and have a nice week end.
> Teresa
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 5:35 AM
> Subject:
inal Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 5:35 AM
Subject: RE: avoid multicast storming on catalyst fe [7:71820]
Couldn't you use a VLAN? Maybe that's too much work since you're just
testing though But VLANs divide bro
> >
> >
> >TP wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Group,
> > >
> > > I need help about multiscast.
> > > This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer devices
so
> I
> > > must generate multicast traffic.
> > &g
ideo streamer
> devices so I
> must generate multicast traffic.
> All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl.
> We can reach the office LAN through the same catalyst, in
> particular from/by
> fastethernet0/1.
>
> I must avoid that multicast traffic genereted loca
; This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer devices so
I
> > must generate multicast traffic.
> > All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl.
> > We can reach the office LAN through the same catalyst, in particular
>from/by
> > fast
affic.
> All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl.
> We can reach the office LAN through the same catalyst, in particular
from/by
> fastethernet0/1.
>
> I must avoid that multicast traffic genereted locally floods the LAN
> creating
> excessive traffic.
> Can I a
> Dear Group,
> >
> > I need help about multiscast.
> > This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer
> devices so I
> > must generate multicast traffic.
> > All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl.
> > We can reach the o
TP wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> I need help about multiscast.
> This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer
> devices so I
> must generate multicast traffic.
> All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl.
> We can reach the office LA
Dear Group,
I need help about multiscast.
This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer devices so I
must generate multicast traffic.
All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl.
We can reach the office LAN through the same catalyst, in particular from/by
fastethern
load 1/255, rxload 1/255
> Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
> Keepalive set (10 sec)
> Full-duplex mode, link type is force-up, media type is SX
>
> Scott
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Tim Champion
>
PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 3550 [7:70449]
Does anyone know of a command which will show the flavour of GBIC in a
particular slot of a 3550?
Many thanks in advance.
Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70450&
Does anyone know of a command which will show the flavour of GBIC in a
particular slot of a 3550?
Many thanks in advance.
Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70449&t=70449
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Yeah, some manufacturers support MDI on there ports and some don't...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70204&t=70109
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misco
I have a Catalyst 1600 switch. I have configured three ports in concetrator
mode. The devices are two routers and one laptop. Each device can ping the
switch but they can't ping each other. SRB is enabled on all ports and the
bridge. HELP!
Mitch
Message Posted at:
Sure, open up the case on the switch and resolder some connectors. Just
kidding, no you can not do it via softeware. Just make a crossover cable to
do the job.
Cheers
""sumitsood"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Guys,
>
> Is there a way to configure a 10/100 port on a Cat switch as
Guys,
Is there a way to configure a 10/100 port on a Cat switch as MDI X (cross
connect). So that we can use straight cable to connect two switches...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70109&t=70109
--
FAQ, list
It depends on what are you wanting to do with the (2) Ethernets coming from
the IBM router? Trunk to the Cat? Route (2) networks? Bridge? I was just
saying that Spanning Tree is on by default on a catalyst and if by chance
the IBM router happened to be bridging then that is why one of the ports
Hi palomar,
The switch is simply connected with two networks segment. There is no
Inter-VLAN routing or EtherChannel! So the Catalyst is actived with no
configuration when connected with other switch the router can. Only with
CIsco Catalyst the one of the router IBM port come to block state
Hi Earhart,
May turn off the STP on the Catalyst? What mostly will happen then. Thank
YOu
Best Regards,
HATO
>From: "Joe Earhart (jearhart)"
>Reply-To: "Joe Earhart (jearhart)"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
>Date: Tu
Hi all,
I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to
Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to
the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the
Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet
Juli,
Make sure you don't have bridging turned up on the IBM, spanning tree may be
shutting down one of the ports.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juli
Hato
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help on Cat
: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:56 AM
Subject: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
Hi all,
I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to
Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to
the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router
: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
Hi larry and all first I'd like to thank you for your quick response.
Hm..the router we have is IBM 2210 series. How to know that the router is
configured and running STP. What bout I turn off the STP fro
Please state your intentions for configuring it this way. Are you
configuring inter-VLAN routing? EtherChannel?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66114&t=66072
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.g
Hi larry and all first I'd like to thank you for your quick response.
Hm..the router we have is IBM 2210 series. How to know that the router is
configured and running STP. What bout I turn off the STP from the Catalyst
3550. What is blade center. Sorry for my silly questions. Thanks in ad
: Monday, March 24, 2003 7:56 AM
Subject: Help on Catalyst 3550 [7:66072]
Hi all,
I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to
Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to
the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router
Juli,
Make sure you don't have bridging turned up on the IBM, spanning tree may be
shutting down one of the ports.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juli
Hato
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help on Cat
Hi all,
I have a router IBM that has 2 ethernet ports. The IBM router connect to
Cisco Catalyst 3550 that is not configured. When the router IBM connect to
the switch one of the ethernet port from the IBM router got block by the
Cisco Switch. All you have to know is that I need to ethernet
The msfc-1 or the msfc-2 module is the router module for
the sup-1 or the sup-2...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Hafner
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: RSM Equivalent for the Catalyst
The RSM equivalent would be the MSM. The internal module would be
the equivalent of the RSFC, the MSFC.
Dave
Kevin Hafner wrote:
> Goofy question here...
>
> What internal module would be the equivalent of the WS X5302 (RSM) for the
> 6500 catalyst switch. If one exists anywa
Goofy question here...
What internal module would be the equivalent of the WS X5302 (RSM) for the
6500 catalyst switch. If one exists anyways?
Kev
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65760&t=65760
--
F
. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 2948G L3 [7:65733]
Can I do SPAN monitoring on this switch, for example to do monitoring
with a sniffer ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65739&
Can I do SPAN monitoring on this switch, for example to do monitoring with a
sniffer ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65733&t=65733
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.
yes Port Spanning..
-- Original Message --
From: "Eduardo Perestrelo"
Reply-To: "Eduardo Perestrelo"
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:44:29 GMT
>Hi,
>
>I have a Catalyst 6509 and need to sniff network.
>If possible ena
Yes and here is how you configure it:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration
_guide_chapter09186a00800c65f8.html
""Eduardo Perestrelo"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I have a Catalyst 6509 and ne
I'm sure many of you have already read about this new switch, but these are
quite different looking than the normal Cisco switches I'm used to working
with. Plus, I even had a dream last night about these silly things, so they
were on my mind this morning.
Cisco designed these basically for the
You do this with the span command
-Original Message-
From: Eduardo Perestrelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sniffer on Catalyst 6509 [7:64894]
Hi,
I have a Catalyst 6509 and need to sniff network.
If possible
Hi,
I have a Catalyst 6509 and need to sniff network.
If possible enable one port to read all traffic to sniff ?!
Thanks,
Eduardo Perestrelo
CCNA / CCAI
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64894&t=64894
--
t;understand what the filename means.
>>
>>Steve Wilson
>>Network Engineer
>>-Original Message-
>>From: John Tafasi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: 05 March 2003 06:33
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Catalyst 3550 SMI or EMI [7:64442]
>&
derstand what the filename means.
>
> Steve Wilson
> Network Engineer
> -Original Message-
> From: John Tafasi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 March 2003 06:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Catalyst 3550 SMI or EMI [7:64442]
>
> How do I know if a catalys
understand what the filename means.
Steve Wilson
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: John Tafasi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 06:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 3550 SMI or EMI [7:64442]
How do I know if a catalyst 3550 is running EMI or SMI image. I tried
TED] On Behalf Of
John Tafasi
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:32 PM
To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab
Subject: Catalyst 3550 SMI or EMI
How do I know if a catalyst 3550 is running EMI or SMI image. I tried
using
show version but that gave me no clue.
Thanks
John Tafasi
Message Posted at:
http://www.
""John Tafasi"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> How do I know if a catalyst 3550 is running EMI or SMI image. I tried
using
> show version but that gave me no clue.
sure? I think it's there somewhere...
if nothing else, the SMI image contains an "
How do I know if a catalyst 3550 is running EMI or SMI image. I tried using
show version but that gave me no clue.
Thanks
John Tafasi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64442&t=64442
--
FAQ, list archi
Does anyone know why the Giant counter below shows "-" as opposed to a
numerical counter? Cisco Works is showing the trunk as suffering from a high
number of oversize errors but the port counters don't back this up. I've
tried a clear counters but this has made no difference.
Sessions_A (enable) s
I checked the Network Address Translation Catalyst Switch Support Matrix on
Cisco's website and confirmed that the 3550 does not support NAT.
""Michael Williams"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't believe the 3550 supports NAT. There was a rece
I don't believe the 3550 supports NAT. There was a recent discussion about
this on the IE mailing list, and the conclusion was that the 3550 doesn't
support NAT.
There are some debug commands relating to NAT, but it seems to be part of
the clustering.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
""John Tafasi"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Does any body know how to enable CGMP on a 3550 catalyst switch?
>
>
chapter 33 of the configuration guide, as found on cco
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64254&t=64240
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it's
set cgmp enable - If it's set-based switch
Or
ip cgmp - if it's IOS.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64253&t=64240
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.
Does any body know how to enable CGMP on a 3550 catalyst switch?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64240&t=64240
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.htm
Who knows whether or not Catalyst 3550 support NAT?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64239&t=64239
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
I presume you've configured one of them as a vtp server, while the other as
a vtp client? Likewise, they should both have the same vtp domain name.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64156&t=63937
--
FAQ, list archives,
Go here:
http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/lan/cat1900.shtml
You should have a CCO account.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64126&t=64122
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.c
Hi,
Please help me to find out that from where can I get Catalyst 1900
Enterprise software as at the moment I am using Catalyst 1900 standard
software and it don't support CLI based interface at all and only works with
Menue based mode.
I will appreciate your co-operation.
Thanks
1 - 100 of 1028 matches
Mail list logo
