CIE WAN, CCIE Design ..etc" I say about 35% to 40%
are CCIE R/S .. only a guess ..
* For the Cisco Design Certifications .. are these
books are enough (Cisco Press) ..
1) Top-Down Network Design "Mrs. Priscilla
Oppenheimer"
2) Cisco Internetwork Design
3) Cisco CCIE Fundame
Does anyone out there use the Cisco Network Designer tool? If so what are
your views on it.
Here is the link to view the actual tool.
http://www.cisco.com/partner/cnd/inside.html
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.h
Title: Network Design Question
Hey group,
A company HQ has two 3620s each with one T1 into the same frame relay cloud. There are 20 branch offices with non-Cisco routers pointing into the same FR cloud. Is there anyway to provide load balancing on the WAN side in this situation? I
ED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
McCallum, Robert
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 6:03 AM
To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)
Subject:Cisco Network Design
Does anyone out there use the Cisco Network Designer tool? If so what are
your views on it.
gt; general I like it a lot.
>
> Chuck
>
> -Original Message-
> From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> McCallum, Robert
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 6:03 AM
> To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E
study. Com (E-mail)
Subject: Cisco Network Design
Does anyone out there use the Cisco Network Designer tool? If so what are
your views on it.
Here is the link to view the actual tool.
http://www.cisco.com/partner/cnd/inside.html
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscri
a first rough design
that MUST be reviewed by a qualified presales engineer. It does
reduce work for that engineer, but doesn't replace her.
Was this the tool that was being used to evaluate CCIE/Design
solutions? Scary if so...network design is sufficiently an art that
I don't think
is an additional $1995.
Anyway, don't think it can be downloaded from CCO.
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 11:39 AM
Subject
I have both logins and only the reseller login will work. Kevin is
correct.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Mark Rose; Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Cisco Network Design
Perhaps you need a
any thoughts welcome
we have a lan including proxy server and database server
there are two depts in the lan , one public and one private, ther is no vlan
and not supported on switch
the public department connect to the internet via proxy server which has a
acounting software connection to the da
>Hey group,
>
>A company HQ has two 3620s each with one T1 into the same frame
>relay cloud. There are 20 branch offices with non-Cisco routers
>pointing into the same FR cloud. Is there anyway to provide load
>balancing on the WAN side in this situation?
What problem are you trying to solv
In a message dated 8/8/00 10:48:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< > I believe that I can use HSRP on the LAN side of HQ, but that is
>not possible on the WAN. I cannot use EIGRP because it is Cisco
>proprietary.
>>
Isn't HSRP used more for fault tolerance than it is
Title: RE: Network Design Question
The problems I am trying to solve are reconvergence after failures in HQ and equalization of the load on the T1s.
The traffic is pretty equal among the remote sites.
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
nobody@groupsSubject: Re: Network Design Question
Title: RE: Network Design Question
HSRP is primarily used for fault tolerance, but it can be used for load balancing. If you configure two HSRP groups with the routers as primary in one group, and standby in the other, you will achieve fault tolerance and load balancing.
-Original
I need a scheme of network.It need seven hundreds points.please give me some
advice on how to design it.It include that how to select network
product,product configuration.They are seted in a building.It have twenty
layers.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64422&t=
Hi all,
Let me start with I am about to start my design track. Every one
comments on Priscilla's Book Top Down Network Design I was just looking at
it and was wondering since this was written dec 1998 is it still current to
today's network topology's (Not trying to flam
Does any one know of any good books or resources that talk about building
networks for co-locations on the Internet. I want to find something that has
case examples and recommendations to build co-location Internet sites for
e-commerce. The only places I found are small articles on Cisco's website
Hello all,
We are migrating off of Banyan to Windows 2000 in late July and
through August. Concurrent with the migration will be an
infrastructure overhaul. I would like to lay out my plans and
thoughts; any comments, advice, criticism, improvements, etc. greatly
appreciated.
I have 95% of my ha
Well .
I am reconstructing the Network of a 10 storey building with 10 to 150 nodes
per floor . about 75 meters tall .
I proposed to use a collapsed backbone structure with 2950T switches for
the floor with <50 nodes , and catalyst 4000 switches with multiple
100BaseTx(48) modules for access lay
Well .
I am reconstructing the Network of a 10 storey building with 10 to 150 nodes
per floor . about 75 meters tall .
I proposed to use a collapsed backbone structure with 2950T switches for
the floor with <50 nodes , and catalyst 4000 switches with multiple
100BaseTx(48) modules for access lay
any thoughts welcome
we have a lan including proxy server and database server
there are two depts in the lan , one public and one private, ther is no vlan
and not supported on switch
the public department connect to the internet via proxy server which has a
acounting software connection to the da
Hi All
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17130&t=17130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17132&t=17132
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17128&t=17128
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17129&t=17129
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17131&t=17131
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I am designing a network with following requirements. Can somebody suggest
me a good book on network design?
The requirements are:
1. 2 T1's to 2 different ISP for redundancy
2. Firewall
3. Host own DNS, Webserver
4. Have private network separated from the public network.
P
Can anyone give some feedback as to whether this would be a good book to buy
to futher my network design knowledge or could someone recommend a better
book.
EIGRP Network Design Solutions
Author: Ivan Pepelnjak, CCIE SRP: $55.00
ISBN: 1578701651 Pages: 366
Pub Date: Oct 1999 Media: Web site
6:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EIGRP Network Design Solutions Book
It's a great book, must read for CCIE level exam!!!
SK
Robert Padjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is a very good book, although I wish
""ferry ferry"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I need a scheme of network.It need seven hundreds points.please give me
some
> advice on how to design it.It include that how to select network
> product,product configuration.They are seted in a building.It have twenty
> layers.
Let's se
All,
Be kind...
GM
-Original Message-
From: ferry ferry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: network design [7:64422]
I need a scheme of network.It need seven hundreds points.please give me some
advice on how to design
Great answer Chuck. It sounds like you figured out his/her basic needs,
though we would need more detail to provide a detailed design, of course,
and payment for design services. :-) Well, actually your idea of asking a
vendor to do an RFP might mean a free design (that would be biased toward
the v
I guess I'm the only one with the problem of that many then. I'll take your
words for it that it works OK, but I still keep thinking back to that one
study (don't recall its name), and can't help but think effiecency would go
by some noticeable degree. anybody can through switch and hubs around,
w
""Scott Roberts"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I guess I'm the only one with the problem of that many then. I'll take
your
> words for it that it works OK, but I still keep thinking back to that one
> study (don't recall its name), and can't help but think effiecency would
go
> by som
to be answered so the
vendor can work their magic.
off to germany for a week - will return with more "opportunities to
excel", no doubt.
garrett
- Original Message -
From: Scott Roberts
Date: Friday, March 7, 2003 2:42 pm
Subject: Re: network design [7:64422]
> I gues
Hey Chuck,
How did that big design go, the one you mentioned on the list a few
months ago?
Symon
-Original Message-
From: The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 March 2003 20:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: network design [7:64422]
""Scott Robert
g design go, the one you mentioned on the list a few
> months ago?
>
> Symon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The Long and Winding Road
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 March 2003 20:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: network design [7:64422]
>
>
I am reading Priscilla's book "Top Down Network Design" for the second
time for a refresher and decided to hit the pool after I got home. On
the way out I looked on my book shelf and saw "Advanced IP Network
Design" that I haven't had a chance to look at yet. So
Hi everyone
I've got a project where I have to design and implement EIGRP in a small to
medium sized network of about 50 to 70 routers. One of my main problems is
what to do with routing updates at the firewalls at each site, should they
be allowed to pass through the firewall or should statics b
Does anyone in here have any experience with large scale DWDM design? If so
would you be willing to chat with me about using "metro DWDM" equipment vs
long haul equipment in a regional (8 runs that can be arranged into one or
two rings, each run at 100Km) DWDM network with OC-192?
-
Proper network design?
I have a few questions for the group that maybe someone can answer. From my
studies when I got CCNA certified, I understood that different networks were
ALWAYS separated by a router. At my company we have this equipment that was
purchased several months ago that acts as a
Hi All,
Like my previous emails, had a network designed for some 460 ports. Hoever,
like yesterday, I have been told now to cater for some 650 ports, and to
plan for VOIP in a few months time.
My topology looked like
[Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006]
First, I wish to thank all of you who contributed to the question of network
design. In particular, I would like to thank Larry Letterman who spent a
fair bit of time, and explained in detail, why he made changes and what
benefits these changes made.
The end result:
Each switch in the network
""Dwayne Saunders"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
> Let me start with I am about to start my design track. Every one
> comments on Priscilla's Book Top Down Network Design I was just looking at
> it and was wo
so poetic
Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: Chuck's Long Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: network design [7:54142]
&qu
Dwayne Saunders wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Let me start with I am about to start my design track. Every
> one
> comments on Priscilla's Book Top Down Network Design I was just
> looking at
> it and was wondering since this was written dec 1998 is it
> still
HI everybody
I am designing a voip network. I want to take ip
traffic throug a leased line put them to the pstn
through pbx.
I am going to use 3640 with vic- E&M card and WIC-2T
to get the leased line.
I am going to use ericosn DM110 as pbx
Will this work or tell me your ideas and sugestions
ci
Sammi,
This may be a bit ungracious but how is your security as it seems now that
we have all the plans?
Karl
- Original Message -
From: "Sammi"
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 12:05 PM
Subject: Proposed Network Design [7:10494]
> Hello all,
>
> We are migrati
On 30 Jun 2001 08:50:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("hal9001") wrote:
>Sammi,
>
>This may be a bit ungracious but how is your security as it seems now that
>we have all the plans?
Don't see that it'd be any different.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10507&t=104
I.E. None then!
- Original Message -
From: "Sammi"
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed Network Design [7:10494]
> On 30 Jun 2001 08:50:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("hal9001") wrote:
>
> >Sammi,
> >
> >This may be
Comments inline.
- Original Message -
From: Sammi
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 4:05 AM
Subject: Proposed Network Design [7:10494]
> Hello all,
>
> We are migrating off of Banyan to Windows 2000 in late July and
> through August. Concurrent with the migratio
---
>From: "Sammi"
>To:
>Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 2:36 PM
>Subject: Re: Proposed Network Design [7:10494]
>
>
>> On 30 Jun 2001 08:50:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("hal9001") wrote:
>>
>> >Sammi,
>> >
>> >This ma
On 30 Jun 2001 11:45:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Tony Medeiros")
wrote:
>Comments inline.
Thanks for the input, followups below:
>I hope that 2948 is a 2948G-L3 layer 3 switch. If not, you going to need
>some kind of router for inter-vlan connectivity.
Yes, it is a L3, chosen specifically f
Wasn't having a go but I think you were too specific and pinned exactly down
to who you are and where you are etc etc, somebody will go sniffing just for
the kicks.
Karl
- Original Message -
From: "Sammi"
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed Ne
t;
>Reply-To: "Sammi"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Proposed Network Design [7:10494]
>Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 07:05:22 -0400
>
>Hello all,
>
>We are migrating off of Banyan to Windows 2000 in late July and
>through August. Concurrent with the migration will b
Sorry all .
My primary message was quite messed up . I just corrected it .
Well .
I am reconstructing the Network of a 10 storey building with 10 to 150 nodes
per floor . about 75 meters tall .
I proposed to use a collapsed backbone structure with 2950T switches for
the floor with 50 nodes .
Fo
o feel shafted after you spend $50 on a book that
only covers the basics.
However, alot of the advanced stuff can seriously be overwhelming at times.
So use the internet to get you knowledge of basic network design, learn a
little as you go, then go to the advanced books.
a search on google for &
goto http://www.priscilla.com/
She has a BOOK about Network Design called "TOP DOWN NETWORK DESIGN"
-Original Message-
From: Zolla Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network Design Book [7:17134]
Hi
edback as to whether this
> would be a good book to buy
> to futher my network design knowledge or could
> someone recommend a better
> book.
>
> EIGRP Network Design Solutions
> Author: Ivan Pepelnjak, CCIE SRP: $55.00
> ISBN: 1578701651 Pages: 366
> Pub Date:
(and have) recommended that no organization
> consider implementing EIGRP without reviewing its
> contents.
>
> --- Shane Stockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone give some feedback as to whether this
> > would be a good book to buy
> > to futher my
'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: EIGRP Network Design Solutions Book
It is good, but the daddy of them all ( personal opinion only here- don't
want some one to scold me) is Doyle's
Routing TCP/IP. That is a awesome book that will knock you socks off.
-Original Message-
I'm reading Priscilla's "Top-Down Network Design". I recommend it as a
complement to the Semester 7 BCMSN books.
Is there a design strategy or methodology that I can use to diagram
application layers into the logical topology? The application I have
in mind is AVVID. Suppos
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Steve Watson
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Network Design... Hmmm [7:44417]
>
>
> I am reading Priscilla's book "Top Down Network Design" for the second
> time for a refresher and
you sit.
;-)
Elmer
- Original Message -
From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:21 PM
Subject: RE: Network Design... Hmmm [7:44417]
> And what's really interesting, is that in the Cisco Internet Design book,
it
> says to start at the Core layer
Is it worthwhile to re-examine the assumption that an individual should
start at one end of the all-important "stack" and work their way to the
other end?
As far as the process itself goes (although, all too often there's not a lot
of process or method associated with design, but I'm sure we're a
At 08:49 PM 5/17/02, Steve Watson wrote:
>I am reading Priscilla's book "Top Down Network Design" for the second
>time for a refresher and decided to hit the pool after I got home.
Thanks for reading Top-Down Network Design. I hope you had a nice swim and
didn't drink
Network design is an iterative process. I agree with you that it's not
entirely linear.
Top-Down Network Design doesn't deal so much with stacks or layers as it
does with the need to do a logical design before a physical design. Also,
it makes the important point that the first
At 2:03 PM -0400 5/18/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>At 08:49 PM 5/17/02, Steve Watson wrote:
>>I am reading Priscilla's book "Top Down Network Design" for the second
>>time for a refresher and decided to hit the pool after I got home.
>
>Thanks for reading
This was not a comparison of network design methodologies, it was mean
to be humorous (I totally agree with the top down process). The idea of
"build a network and they will come" simply does not work!
The context of the other book was that no network will function properly
if Laye
> BTW, how many is too many? :-)
Don't know about that, but I heard that one's enough, two's too
little ;-)
Marko.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44458&t=44417
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription i
""Steve Watson"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This was not a comparison of network design methodologies, it was mean
> to be humorous (I totally agree with the top down process). The idea of
> "build a network and they
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chuck
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network Design... Hmmm [7:44417]
""Steve Watson"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
&g
whether or not
they work, in turn somewhat contributing to the ecomonic viability of
professions shared by some members of the group.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Watson"
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: Network Design... Hmmm [7:44417]
> This was
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network Design... Hmmm [7:44417]
""Steve Watson"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This was not a comparison of network design methodologies, it was mean
> to be humorous (I totally agree with the top down pr
ada..
>
> Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Chuck
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Network Design... Hmmm [7:44417]
>
> ""Steve Watson"&qu
I don't think Priscilla has to get into too many arguments with Retana,
Slice and White (the Advanced IP Network Design authors). While it does
claim that the best place to start is at the bottom: the physical layer,
it then promptly ignores discussion of the physical layer (this is a
Ah yes, the financial industry...I'm glad someone else can feel my pain.
I've been consulting in this industry for the last five years and let me
say that I'm not surprised by too much anymore.
I actually had the pleasure of meeting the authors of the Advanced IP
Network Design
Donlon"
>Reply-To: "Patrick Donlon"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: EIGRP network design [7:21019]
>Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:52:28 -0400
>
>Hi everyone
>
>I've got a project where I have to design and implement EIGRP in a small to
>medium sized network
on't think you can do it. An eigrp packet uses multicast
> addressing and has no layer 3 address. I would think that a firewall would
> not pass this traffic.
>
> >From: "Patrick Donlon"
> >Reply-To: "Patrick Donlon"
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
What kind of firewalls? Pix? If so, try RIP v2 with redistribution into
your routers. As for discontiguous networks, there are many ways around
that, with a different cost associated of course.
At 12:52 PM 9/25/01 -0400, Patrick Donlon wrote:
>Hi everyone
>
>I've got a project where I have t
Yes the firewalls are all PIX. For the PIX can I set up the PIX to receive
RIP routes redistributed from the EIGRP routers? If so this will save a lot
of admin work, but will this be a security risk, ie. someone being able to
inject routes into the PIX?
regards
""Carroll Kong"" wrote in message
RIPv1 sends to 255.255.255.255. RIPv2 sends to 224.0.0.9. They both use UDP
port 520. Both the source and dest ports are 520.
Are you sure static routes wouldn't be the best bet, though? I haven't
followed the entire discussion, so if that's off the wall, just ignore it.
Priscilla
At 09:09 A
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EIGRP network design [7:21019]
RIPv1 sends to 255.255.255.255. RIPv2 sends to 224.0.0.9. They both us
heimer
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EIGRP network design [7:21019]
>
>
> RIPv1 sends to 255.255.255.255. RIPv2 sends to 224.0.0.9. They both use
UDP
> port 520. Both the source and dest ports are 520.
>
> Are you sure
""Mike Bernico"" wrote in message:
> Does anyone in here have any experience with large scale DWDM design?
> If so would you be willing to chat with me about using "metro DWDM"
> equipment vs long haul equipment in a regional (8 runs that can be
> arranged into one or two rings, each run at 100Km
Can you post the config of the router? Does the Ethernet interface have
sub-interfaces? One for each subnet? The answer is probably in the
configuration of the interface on the router. What IP and Subnet mask does
it have? Could be that the subnet mask of the router Ethernet is
255.255.240.0
No subinterfaces are used. Here's the Cisco 2514 config:
Router#show startup-config
Using 940 out of 32762 bytes
!
version 12.1
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname Router
ip subnet-zero
!
interface Ethernet0
description outside
192.168.0.100 is what is doing the real routing then for 192.168.2.0/24. If
you follow the path, from a 192.168.0.20 machine to 192.168.2.20 say, it
goes from 192.168.0.20, to the default gateway, 192.168.0.1 which checks the
route table and sends it to 192.168.0.100 (which is on the same network
TED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Proper network design? [7:49536]
Proper network design?
I have a few questions for the group that maybe someone can answer. From
my
studies when I got CCNA certified, I understood that different networks
were
ALWAY
one block was going to have 'more
access' than another, so the 2.x subnet was thrown behind another router as
a choke point?
Thanks!
TJ
-Original Message-
From: Frank H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Prop
Now I understand. I read a few articles on the Cisco site after searching
for the term "router on a stick" and found a good explanation. Thanks for
your help.
Frank
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49558&t=49536
--
ect: RE: Proper network design? [7:49536]
> Now I understand. I read a few articles on the Cisco site after searching
> for the term "router on a stick" and found a good explanation. Thanks for
> your help.
>
> Frank
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstu
Yes, I am using a 2514. It does have 2 10BaseT interfaces (through AUI
adapters). I am not using subinterfaces. Both ports are used - one port goes
to the Internet (for hosts that require Internet access) and the other
connects directly to the 24 port hub which resides within the internal LAN.
Thi
I assume you are using primary and secondary IP address on this one ethernet
interface (which is creating the "router on a stick" effect)?
Rob
Frank H wrote:
>
> Yes, I am using a 2514. It does have 2 10BaseT interfaces
> (through AUI adapters). I am not using subinterfaces. Both
> ports are us
No, just one IP address on each interface. Check my earlier post for the
full configuration.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49578&t=49536
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
The "router on a stick" effect comes from this:
ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.100
All traffic destined to any network not on 192.168.0.0 goes to the gateway
(192.168.0.1) on interface ethernet 1. The router then re-routes 192.168.2.0
traffic back on the 192.168.0.0 network to 192.
This is not the classcial router on a stick model. That model is for routing
between VLANs on a router with 1 interface using trunking. All this router
is doing is taking packets from its eth1 interface, comparing them to its
routing table and forwarding out the same eth1 interface for the gateway
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Proper network design? [7:49536]
No, just one IP address on each interface. Check my earlier post for the
full configuration.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7
I understand this configuration, but question how the 192.168.2.2 machine
knows how to get back to the 192.168.0.20. I don't question that it will
work, but if it is not a router interface with 2 addresses from each segment
defined, then what default gateway does the 192.168.2.2 machine use? If
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
