I'm not very familiar with generic traffic shaping.
But, at first glance it looks like it is basically the same thing as frame
relay traffic shaping except that it does not dynamically change based on
network congestion because there is no method set up to notify the router of
any congestion
The easiest way to do this is to only configure the CIR and Line speeds and
let the rest default.
Example commands -
int s0
frame-relay traffic shapping Enable FRTS on the interface
frame-relay class ExampleClass Shape as defined in map class
frame-relay map-class ExampleClass
Olden,
Hey don't forget to do the frame-relay interface-type dceand also the
clockrate...Heres a sample config of my 4000 that I use for frame
switching.. Let me know if this helps... Yes it looks correct though the
way you have it...
Cory
-Original Message-
From: Olden
cc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
Subject: Re: Frame Relay and DE bit
what is an asynchronous CIR?
From: "Kishor Bhagwat" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Kishor Bhagwat" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frame Relay and DE bit
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:22:01
it should be like this
Interface serial 0
Frame-relay route 16 interface serial 1 18
Interface serial1
Frame-relay route 18 interface serial 0 16
provided you want to announce DLCI 16 on serial 0 and DLCI 18 on serial 1
and interconnect them to form a PVC ...
I am not getting why you have
on serial1. Correct me if i am wrong .
Regards
Atif
-Original Message-
From: Olden Pieterse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 2:14 PM
To: 'Atif Awan'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switching
Hi there
Thx Atif
Its me and my Motorolas again !
We need
Cheers
Olden
-Original Message-
From: Atif Awan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 11:10 AM
To: Olden Pieterse; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switching
it should be like this
Interface serial 0
Frame-relay route 16 interface serial 1 18
Interface
-Original Message-
From: Atif Awan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 11:34 AM
To: Olden Pieterse; 'Atif Awan'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switching
Inverse arp maps layer 3 addresses to the appropriate DLCI.
Yes you can have multiple frame-relay
-Original Message-
From: Olden Pieterse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 2:39 PM
To: 'Atif Awan'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switching
Atif ,
16 18 on serial 0
18 on serial 1
Basically the aim is to get from one Motorola side through the Cisco
If you want DLCI 16 on one interface to switch to DLCI 16 on the other AND
DLCI 18 on one interface to switch to DLCI 18 on the other then the config
below will do it for you.
Darren
!
frame-relay switching
!
interface serial 0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay intf-type dce
clock rate ?
It makes sense. So it means I need a router with two serial interfaces...
Thanks,
Billy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
1F5939AED2D5D31195790008C7914978D17BB1@CHS024">news:1F5939AED2D5D31195790008C7914978D17BB1@CHS024...
you need to switch it to anothet interface to transfer the dlci...
you need to switch it to anothet interface to transfer the dlci...
u need an input and output port for a frame switch
-Original Message-
From: Billy Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame-Relay using two routers
This is usually a circuit problem somewhere along the path, but I've also
seen where a bad switch port will cause problems. If the circuit tests fine
with all patterns over an hour's time, I'd ask the carrier to try swapping
ports to see if things change.
- Don
-Original Message-
From:
You only need one PVC per remote in a hub spoke environment, which in your
example would be a total of two PVCs for the whole network. Even if you were
to design a full mesh it would only take 3 PVCs to connect each site to the
other two. R1-R2-R3-R1 (I suck at ASCII art).
Think about it, if
00 6:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; M Z
Cc: Bryant Andrews
Subject: Re: Frame Relay switch
Taking into account that the router you have does meet all the requirements
for a FR switch all that is really needed is the command;
Frame_switch(config)#frame-relay switching
since your frame switch i
hello..
the ratio shld definitely be a cause for concern, since too many of ur
incoming packets are in burst mode.
and on the outgoing side, either the CIR is correct or underutilised.
see if ur FR provider gives ya an asynchronous CIR?
regards,
kishor
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 07:27:57 -0500
People,
you can read about the DE bit in a frame relay header
anywhere
Rawdawg has spoken!
--- Kishor Bhagwat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello..
the ratio shld definitely be a cause for concern,
since too many of ur
incoming packets are in burst mode.
and on the
Here's my opinion;
An NNI (Network to Network Interface ) is being used to interconnect 2
different frame-relay networks on a PVC basis. This way a dlci on one
network can be pointed to a dlci on another network ( with the NNI in
between the 2 telco's ).
You normally thus don't need to
goto http://www.fatkid.com/html/frame_relay_intro.html this will explain
how it works and sample configs
"M Z" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Would anyone kindly share how to config a Cisco router to act as a FR
switch.
Thanks in advance.
: Assuming one Hub and 99 spokes you would need 99
: "frame-relay interface-dlci" statements per site if
: you wanted to talk to every remote site.
: I cannot see this being a practicle solution
: though, i.e You would be committing a massive 'single
: point of failure at the Hub', plus I
Kamoto
There are normally 2 basic methods of interworking ATM with Frame Relay
which are normally handled by a FRATM.
They are: Network Interworking Function (NIWF)
Service Interworking Function (SIWF)
NIWFs work in pairs, have both a Frame i/f and an ATM cell based i/f.
Taking into account that the router you have does meet all the requirements
for a FR switch all that is really needed is the command;
Frame_switch(config)#frame-relay switching
since your frame switch is normally considered the DCE you'll also want to
enable you clock rate on the connecting
need to map
a PVC between DLCI 100 and DLCI 200.
Thanks so much.
From: "Atif Awan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "M Z" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frame Relay switch
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:39:14 +0500
Here is a sample configuration :
frame-relay switching
!
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: Frame Relay switch
Thanks Atef and Nigel for your responses,
the two other questions I have are
1)how do you make the switch auto-sense the LMI type, or is that a
function
of the router?
2)in the command frame-relay route 100
You can configure a FR switch by using the following set of commands
..for example .a cisco router acting as a FR_Switch have its S0 and
S1 configured as,
interface Serial0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
no ip mroute-cache
clockrate 64000
frame-relay interface-dlci 20
Larry,
I'm a newbie on FR, however, I would compare your
in PACKETS with your in DE PACKETS and you are losing
2/3rds of your data. I would look at increasing your
CIR by 2/3rds as a result. Unless of course nobody is
complaining about the access speed ?
Phil.
--- "Chance, Larry" [EMAIL
Assuming one Hub and 99 spokes you would need 99
"frame-relay interface-dlci" statements per site if
you wanted to talk to every remote site.
I cannot see this being a practicle solution
though, i.e You would be committing a massive 'single
point of failure at the Hub', plus I very much
, and maybe run some tests
yourself during business hours and observe what happens.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phil
Barker
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 6:34 AM
To: Chance, Larry; 'GroupStudy'
Subject:Re: Frame Relay
respond to Phil Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco cabanaboy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
Subject: Re: frame-relay design
Assuming one Hub and 99 spokes you would need 99
"frame-relay interface-dlci" statements per site if
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 16/06/2000 01:05:58
Please respond to "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Phil Barker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Chance, Larry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"'GroupStudy'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
Subject:
NO sub`s are treated as seperate interfaces
From: Doug Laing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Doug Laing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame-Relay and split-horizon question
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:34:54 -0400
When you have a point to multipoint frame-relay (partial mesh)
packet corruptions
""Stull, Cory"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
0D7A05A19CE4D211BD050008C7330FE7147A18@CCUPDC">news:0D7A05A19CE4D211BD050008C7330FE7147A18@CCUPDC...
What would cause a frame-relay CRC?
Rx CRC Exceptions Hour Day
#Frames %Max Hour Thresh 05 Wed 2523 13.0028 0.0100 21 Thu
00 7:02 PM
To: David Smith; Study group (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Frame Relay limitations question
Dave,
To quote HCB yet again "WPAYTTS?" (What problem are you trying to solve?)
This should be considered in context - don't ever think about running 60
sub-int into a 2500, it would just
You need a FR switch in between them, most Cisco routers can be config'ed to
act as FR switches. Search the list, there are many posts on how to do this.
HTH
--
John Hardman, MCSE+I, CCNA
ArrisTech/CCS-IS SysAdmin
"Cisco Wave" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Without a switch, in what way is it Frame Relay?
From: quezada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: quezada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frame Relay on back-to-back routers (without FR switches)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 11:59:37 -0400
I want to know if we can run Frame Relay
You can do this.
Here's the basics:
R1
interface Serial1/0
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no fair-queue
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
R2
frame-relay switching
interface Serial1/0
ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no
YES!!! you can run as many protocols as you would like over one F/R PVC as
long as you have enough bandwidth so as to not have delay issues. You can
also prioritize the more urgent traffic.
hope this helps.
EF
-Original Message-
From: Dan West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dan West
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 3:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: frame relay newbie question
Is it common/practical to run IP and IPX over the same
frame relay subinterface?
CL: Yes. Why not?
Holland
CCNP,MCSE
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Dan West" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 8:11 AM
Subject: RE: frame relay newbie question
Is it common/practical to run IP and IPX over the same
fram
Title: NetWare 5.0 was RE: frame relay newbie question
Yes, you are correct. I am working on a large project for a county school system and they are currently upgrading all of their servers to NetWare 5.0 The funny part is that at first we were using IP/IPX in compatibility mode and then were
from now on, phasing IPX out, am I correct?)
Richard Holland
CCNP,MCSE
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Dan West" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 8:11 AM
Subject: RE: frame relay newbie que
Yes it is common to run IP and IPX on the same
frame relay subinterface. The real advantage to using
subinterfaces on frame is to fix some headaches with
routing protocols in a NBMA network.
As for IPX being an issue much longer... That depends on
your customers. Even Novell has indicated that
d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: lundi 22 mai 2000 18:53
À:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet:RE: Frame relay back to back
this means your router probably doesn't have a s0/0. go ahead and use s0
-Original Message-
From: Billy
Title: RE: Frame Relay Presentation
A good place to start might be www.cisco.com
do a search on CCO for Frame-Relay
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Charles Nunie
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/23/00 8:55 AM
Subject: Frame Relay Presentation
Hi,
I need information on Frame
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/frame.htm
http://www.mot.com/networking/frame-relay/
http://www.paradyne.com/frame_sourcebook/
http://www.itprc.com/datalink.htm
http://www.protocols.com/protoc.shtml
This should keep you busy.
-Original Message-
From: Charles
I am also trying to setup using 3 routers (1 router configured as switch).
I am following the Hutnik's book. They recommend a configuration on
"serial0/0"... anybody could tell me what is serial0/0 ?
I can configure int s0, but not serial0/0.
Thanks,
Billy
""mikey"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
to use the
s0/0 notation...
I hope this helps!
Dale
[=`)
From: "Billy Monroe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Billy Monroe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frame relay back to back
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 09:02:05 -0700
I am also trying to setup using
this means your router probably doesn't have a s0/0. go ahead and use s0
-Original Message-
From: Billy Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frame relay back to back
I am also trying to setup using 3 routers (1 router
You you not have to map in a back to back scenarion .
inverse arp should be able to do find it's way to the other int..This is
point to point.
My scenario is more comple than this one and i am able to ping without
mapping.i am using a cisco router with four interfaces as a cloud . one
would
Vic,
I get something similar CDC comes up then goes down -are you setting this
up with 2 CSU/DSUs? or are you doing the DTE-DCE thing?
Brian
From: "Vic Feferberg" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Vic Feferberg" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame relay back to back
Date: Sat,
In order to do frame-relay with a back-to-back cable, one router must be
configured as a switch - frame-relay switching (global-config) and the
interface on the switch must be configured as a logical dce - frame-relay
interf-type dce (int-config). When I have done it, i also had to map to my
Have you configure the frame-relay route ??? and "frame-relay
intf-type dce" on the frame-relay switch ???
lee
""Nathan Cruz"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
005c01bfc015$55999d00$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:005c01bfc015$55999d00$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I've set up a frame relay
Justin Vo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:...
Hi,
I managed to capture the log when my frame relay connection bouncing but
yet
I'm unable to interpret this information. Can someone help to determine if
it's my router or my telco that's causing the problem.
My router is Cisco 2501
501 - 553 of 553 matches
Mail list logo
