In match IP address , which Ip address are you trying to match?
ramesh ,ccnp
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com
Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com
Bid for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. Just log on to
http://air
Subject: Policy routing with
route map [7:70567]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi guys ,
Just wanna to ask can loading balacing achieve in this config. Or e1 is use
only , follow by e2 unless e1 is down.
interface serial e0
ip policy route-map ABC
!
route-map ABC
match ip address X.X.X.X
set interface e1 e2 e3 e4
Thank you !
Message Posted at:
http
Distribute lists can have problems, and IIRC arent supported in all
configurations. Ive hit bugs using them with OSPF, so I tend to go with
route maps every time now.
TTFN
Lauren
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70127&t=70121
-
DJ,
A route-map is just way more flexible.
A distribute-list will afford you a single access-list in which you must
define everything, where as a route-map allows you to use multiple
access-lists. This is especially important during temporary changes to
a network topology, where a new route
Hi
Can someone clarify why you would use a route-map instead of distribute list?
Thanks in advance,
-DJ
-
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70121&
needs to send a
> default route to its neighbors. For this, I have used
> the command default-information originate.
> Then I wanted one of the neighbors not to receive the
> default route. I thought that the route-map option at
> the end of the default-information originate, would
Hi,
thanks for your reply,
actually I have a default route in the router.
I tried with a default route poiting to an IP address,
and tried matching on this address in the route-map.
But no success, I even tried with a permit any
access-list but also no success.
Then I removed the first default
command.
-the route-map keyword specifies the conditions the default route must meet
before being distributed. Hence if you specify a route-map with the match
interface cmd, the default route must have its next-hop interface as the
interface specified in the match interface statement. That could
You guys are absolutely right!!
I had to filter inbound NOT outbound.Big difference!!
This route-map matched all routes that traversed AS1000 and set the
community to no-export and thus they were not advertised out of AS34.
Thank you so much for all your help, guys.
Sincerely,
CN
>F
AS's.
If you wanted to use no-export to prevent AS34 from leaking these routes
then you should tag them as such on the way into the AS.
Or as Xueyan's comments say deny the routes in your route-map/acl's on the
way out.
Also given the nature of what you want to filter(routes th
Looks like you have "permit" all the way but no "deny" on the particular AS.
change one permit to deny either in your route-map or access-list should fix
the problem.
Xueyan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php
Done that too!!
router bgp 34
no synchronization
network 195.1.4.0
neighbor 150.1.2.2 remote-as 256
neighbor 150.1.2.2 ebgp-multihop 255
neighbor 150.1.2.2 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 150.1.2.2 send-community
neighbor 150.1.2.2 route-map comm_out out
neighbor 150.1.14.1 remote-as 1
AS34 but am having no luck.R4 is learning a bunch
> of routes from AS100 and the config is on R4 which in in AS34R4#route-map
> comm_out permit 10
> match as-path 99
> set community no-export
> !
> route-map comm_out permit 20
> match ip address 96
> set metric 31337
> !
Hello,I am trying to block any routes that have traversed AS1000 from
being advertised beyond AS34 but am having no luck.R4 is learning a bunch
of routes from AS100 and the config is on R4 which in in AS34R4#route-map
comm_out permit 10
match as-path 99
set community no-export
!
route-map
keyur i already got your point. hehe! i really need a lot practice :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61168&t=61055
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misco
keyur, correct me if im wrong, but isn't it the filters will only filter out
the route for being advertised into the local router's routing table (the
router that did the redistribute and the filtering) but still the other
adjacent routers will still see the route because of the LSAs being
propagat
5/03 8:46:39 AM >>>
Thank you very much for your help, John...as always!!
I did a #access-list 99 permit 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
and just did a route-map deny_lo1 permit 20 without any match
statements.
It worked..
Thanks once again
BTW: Have you got your CCIE # yet??
Message Pos
Thank you very much for your help, John...as always!!
I did a #access-list 99 permit 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
and just did a route-map deny_lo1 permit 20 without any match
statements.
It worked..
Thanks once again
BTW: Have you got your CCIE # yet??
>From: "John N
mask is not matching in acl to interface. You can also do this,
route-map deny_lo1 deny 10
match interface lo1
route-map deny_lo1 permit 20
or else
access-list 99 permit host 1.1.1.1
-Keyur Shah-
CCIE# 4799 (Security;R/S)
CISSP,SCNA,CCSA,MCSE,MCNE
"Say Hello to Your Future!&
i think there is no way to deny that route when using ACLs because ACLs
doesn't filter LSAs. make your area an NSSA, then do a no-redistribute, to
filter out redistributed routes (your TS router will be an ASBR).
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61067&t=61055
-
ter ospf 100
>redistribute connected subnets route-map deny_lo1
>
>route-map deny_lo1 deny 10
>match ip address 99
>!
>route-map deny_lo1 permit 20
>match ip address 98
>
>access-list 98 permit any
>access-list 99 permit 1.1.1.0
>
>On the neighboring router:
&g
erface 1 that I am trying to deny under redistribute
> connected under ospf but am having no luck? What am I doing wrong? Please
> advise. Thank you.
>
> Config:
>
> TS#
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
>
> router ospf 100
> redistribute con
-map deny_lo1
route-map deny_lo1 deny 10
match ip address 99
!
route-map deny_lo1 permit 20
match ip address 98
access-list 98 permit any
access-list 99 permit 1.1.1.0
On the neighboring router:
RTE#r
1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E21.1.1.1 [110/20] via 110.99.100.1, 00:05:02
gt; network (205.10.50.0/24) because the longest matched route will come up as
> the internal 205.10.1.0 network's route, not the 205.0.0.0 static route.
I
> need to force the packet to route through the 205 static route IF it does
> not match the internal network. How would I do this
tatic route IF it does
not match the internal network. How would I do this with a route-map?
NOTE: I need the route-map to check the dest.IP and IF it is not destined
for the 205.10.1.0 subnet then send it to the upstream default gateway.
Mahalo for your help,
Daren
Message Posted at:
Hello Group,
I try to create a simple configuration for a company that have two internet
connections, and also i want some users to use one internet provider and
others the second ISP. I created a route-map as following.
access-list 5 permit 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 6 permit 172.16.2.0
AIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
I think the response for this question is:
The access list:
access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any
!-you need to detect your incoming www traffic.
!-You can use also y
Port Address Translation.
-Original Message-
From: Harold Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
This is something I've been wondering about also. As I understand it
whe
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
I think the response for this question is:
The access list:
Sorry..the access-list is not corect.
Should be:
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 80
Regards
Stefan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55004&t=54910
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groups
I think the response for this question is:
The access list:
access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any
!-you need to detect your incoming www traffic.
!-You can use also your network address for the first "any".
!-route map statement
route-map http_access permit 10
match ip address
>comfortable taking some time to understand it". If the need is that
urgent >that there is no time to spare, you should be able to call TAC
under your >service contract, right? :) > >Good luck. > >Greg Reaume > >
>""YASSER ALY"" wrote in messa
to spare, you should be able to call TAC
under your >service contract, right? :) > >Good luck. > >Greg Reaume > >
>""YASSER ALY"" wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >No, you need to do the
follwoing > >acce
; wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
No, you need to do the follwoing
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 80
route-map http_traffic permit 10
match ip address 101
set next-hop 10.10.10.141
route-map nttp_traffic permit 20
!
int fa2/0
ip policy route-map http
No, you need to do the follwoing
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 80
route-map http_traffic permit 10
match ip address 101
set next-hop 10.10.10.141
route-map nttp_traffic permit 20
!
int fa2/0
ip policy route-map http_traffic
>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >Greetin
Hi,
I suggest that you study again about access-lists and route-maps. This is
the best answer to your question because once you go through it again, you
will be fine.
I kindly ask you to spend just a little time and it will be very clear.
Cheers!!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/
The second access-lists statement says to do the action in the route map
with all traffic.
>From what I undertood you do not want that.
> Greetings,
>
> Need help with a route-map question. I need to force all http
traffic
> to go to 10.10.10.141 address, does my config below
what you have will end up sending ALL traffic to . well to nowhere,
since you have no set statement.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Greetings,
>
> Need help with a route-map
Greetings,
Need help with a route-map question. I need to force all http traffic
to go to 10.10.10.141 address, does my config below allow me to do just
that?
access-list extended 101 permit tcp any host 10.10.10.141 eq 80
access-list extended 101 permit ip any any
route-map http_traffic
This is permiting 0.0.0.0 only, remember the default mask is 0.0.0.0,
exact match.
Dave
Ruihai An wrote:
>
> Group,
>
> I have seen this "access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0" with route-map a couple of
> times and had trouble to find a definite answer. Some place on Cis
Group,
I have seen this "access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0" with route-map a couple of
times and had trouble to find a definite answer. Some place on Cisco web
site say this is permit EVERYTHING, some place says permit NOTHING. Can
anyone explain this?
Thanks
Ruihai
router bgp 3
re
I think 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 is default and 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 is "ANY"
which some IOS's will replace with the actual word "ANY"
Anthony Pace
""Ruihai An"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Group,
>
> I
If the next-hop is actually an IP address on the router
with the route-map, then the packet never gets forwarded
beyond the router.
I don't think the set interface works on ethernet either
as there's some L2 stuff that needs to happen for forwarding
to work here
Figured the p
can't you just route map to ethernet on the local router?
this should send all traffic for the destination network out
that interface regardless. it makes your routing table look
like everything is directly connected but at least it works
for ip route staments..
""bergenpeak"
I'm trying to use the "set ip next-hop" feature in a route-map
and seeing some behavior I don't understand.
If I define the "ip next-hop" to be an IP address that's
not on an interface directly connected to the router performing
the route-map, the router doe
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Cisco
Subject: Route-map - Boson - incorrect?
Here are two statements from BOSON and their associated answers:
"When a Match is made, the Route Map can change the
Here are two statements from BOSON and their associated answers:
"When a Match is made, the Route Map can change the route with the map-tag
command (TRUE)"
"When a Match is made, the Route Map will change the route with the set
command. (FALSE)"
(1) is there such a thing
Tom,
Can you please elaborate how the outbound filter with the community tag of
no-export would help... as I'm still not too clear what it will achieve.
And sorry for the stupid question...
Thanks again.
Best Regards,
Hunt Lee
WebCentral
""Tom Martin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">ne
gt; On Mon, 04 Feb 2002 23:43:41 -0500, Hunt Lee wrote:
>
> > I have a Route-Map question that I'm very confused about:
> >
> > The scenario is from Caslow (p840), it is as follows:
> >
> > Company A has a full T3 connection to the Internet thru the ISP
> &
Hi all,
When I was going thru the topics in BGP - distribute-list and
route-map, I was trying to find out the differences between the two and
where each of these commands would really be useful.
The following is the only difference that I could think of
the AS 300 destination! It seems like the following access-list should
> have been used:
>
> ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^202$
>
> Then again, perhaps I have just totally misunderstood the question. Either
> way, I hope that this helps.
>
> - Tom
>
>
> On
Mon, 04 Feb 2002 23:43:41 -0500, Hunt Lee wrote:
> I have a Route-Map question that I'm very confused about:
>
> The scenario is from Caslow (p840), it is as follows:
>
> Company A has a full T3 connection to the Internet thru the ISP
> AAA-101.NET. Company B has a T1 con
I have a Route-Map question that I'm very confused about:
The scenario is from Caslow (p840), it is as follows:
Company A has a full T3 connection to the Internet thru the ISP AAA-101.NET.
Company B has a T1 connection to the Internet thru the ISP BBB-202.Net.
Company A acquires Company B
ACL 101.
If you have CDP information from the two upstream routers, you could write
a route-map using the 'verify-availability' command. Take a look at the
following example and URL:
route-map MOVE-STUFF permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop 192.168.0.
m: BASSOLE Rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Route map [7:33429]
Hi group,
I would like to define a route-map on a router to forward certain packets
(defined by the ACL 101) to 2 different next-hop address. I use 2 next-hop
ad
Hi group,
I would like to define a route-map on a router to forward certain packets
(defined by the ACL 101) to 2 different next-hop address. I use 2 next-hop
addresses to avoid the single point of failure. The 2 next-hop addresses are
directly attached to the router.
The first next-hop
y" 7/25/01 4:05:12 PM >>>
I have heard that there is a command to tell the router to cache access
list
and route map entries so that all packets don't have to be process
switched
when they go through the acl. Does anyone know what the command is?
Thanks.
Message Posted at:
h
I have heard that there is a command to tell the router to cache access list
and route map entries so that all packets don't have to be process switched
when they go through the acl. Does anyone know what the command is?
Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.ph
That is correct. If it is not adjancent/directly
connected or more then 1 hop away then the route-map
policy will be rejected and normal forwarding takes
place (debug policy).
cisco.com has conflicting docs on this. Some say it
has to be adjancent, others say it doesn't. I remember
one s
That is correct. If it is not adjancent/directly
connected or more then 1 hop away then the route-map
policy will be rejected and normal forwarding takes
place (debug policy).
cisco.com has conflicting docs on this. Some say it
has to be adjancent, others say it doesn't. I remember
one s
Now that we are at the subject of route-map, my experience show that the
x.x.x.x address in the command
set ip next-hop x.x.x.x
must be a directly connected router's interface, in other words, it can not
be more than one hop away.
Can anyone confirm, or dispute this?
Bernard
-Ori
Route-maps work in both directions, but many functions
in IOS can reference a route-map.
For more control, use an access-list as well. The one
you posted will set the next hop for any traffic going
across the ethernet interface except locally generated
traffic by the router. Also, the next hop
to apply a route-map you need to specify on a per neighbor basis, specifying
the direction. You can also have different (or the same) route-map(s)
applied in different directions, should you have a need to do this. Syntax
is:
neighbor route-map
hth
Andy
- Original Message -
From
interface and set the next hop?
Last change, I promise
-Original Message-
From: Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 15:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP Route map [7:4730]
In a BGP route map, when you use the match statement:
match
next
That should read
match interface
-Original Message-
From: Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 15:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP Route map [7:4730]
In a BGP route map, when you use the match statement:
match
next hop x.x.x.x
Is
In a BGP route map, when you use the match statement:
match
next hop x.x.x.x
Is this set to match inbound, or outbound, packets passing through the
specified interface, or am I completely off-base and it is neither one?
TIA
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php
ter.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Taylor"
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 10:49 PM
Subject: NAT: list or route-map? [7:1563]
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about the following configuration:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/quicktip.html
>
> W
Hi,
I have a question about the following configuration:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/quicktip.html
What is the benefit of using the route-map to define what/what not to
translate? Maybe I'm missing something simple, but it seems that you could
simply use the list (175) to do the
PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 014301c0a3fa$e349f400$f402f7a5@bwilson">news:014301c0a3fa$e349f400$f402f7a5@bwilson...
> > This is just a guess, but how about setting the next hop in the
route-map
> to
> > the IP address of ISP A?
> >
> >
> > - Origi
Andrew Cook gave an excellent response, to which I have some inline comments.
The whole multihoming issue is very complex. I discuss it at some
length in Chapter 7 of my _WAN Survival Guide_ (Wiley, ISBN
0471384283), but as part of a broader discussion of fault tolerance
and load distribution
swers as I did but
in an intelligible format :)
Andrew Cook
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jacek Malinowski
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 7:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Route-map
>
>
> I
think your culprit is the default
route
Thanks,
Santosh
""Jacek Malinowski"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
97ths2$bjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97ths2$bjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I want only to know if I've a default route ( 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 se
I want only to know if I've a default route ( 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial 1),
and ip policy route-map on the ethernet interface,
I'll go always trough serial 1 or if the match criteria are met I'll go
trough serial 0 ?
_
FAQ, list archives, and su
nt to test another connection to Internet
>through ISP A at the same time ( small network (10 users) management :) ).
>I'm working as a systems engineer in ISP A :))), and we must sell our link.
>
>I know that the best will be BGP. I know that, but I must find another
>method.
Internet
through ISP A at the same time ( small network (10 users) management :) ).
I'm working as a systems engineer in ISP A :))), and we must sell our link.
I know that the best will be BGP. I know that, but I must find another
method.
Maybe I was wrong, and with route-map command it'
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 1:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Route-map
I have a big problem with the route-map command.
My network looks like :
ISP A ISP B
can now advertise all of your routes.
Hope this helps
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jacek Malinowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Route-map
I have a big problem with th
is a bug in my hypothetical configuration.
> in set ip next-hope
> should be ISP A (1.1.1.2)
>
>
> ""Bradley J. Wilson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 014301c0a3fa$e349f400$f402f7a5@bwilson">news:014301c0a3fa$e349f400$f402f7a5@bwilson...
Your route map affects how your traffic flows outbound to the ISP.
Even with BGP, there is no way to guarantee how external ISPs send to
you, or, even more, how external sources not directly connected to
your ISP will send It's quite common to see 30-40% of queries sent
to one ISP hav
Hi jacek,
Your config regarding the route-map seems ok. On the flip side let
me tell you what I think is happenning :=
1) you have a default route statement throgh serial 1 = "ip route 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 Serial1"
2) therefore a packet generated from 10.x.x.x by default will go th
s just a guess, but how about setting the next hop in the route-map
to
> the IP address of ISP A?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jacek Malinowski
> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:27 AM
> Subject: Route
This is just a guess, but how about setting the next hop in the route-map to
the IP address of ISP A?
- Original Message -
From: Jacek Malinowski
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:27 AM
Subject: Route-map
I have a big problem with the
I have a big problem with the route-map command.
My network looks like :
ISP A ISP B
| |
| |
| |
--s0--(router 2611)--- s1--
configuration (hypothetical
## The packet will never make it to the route map comparison. ##
If a packet comes from a source that is blocked inbound on your
ethernet port by an ACL, the packet will get dropped right there
regardless of what a route-map says..
ACL's and route-maps don't work in the way
For sake of argument lets say there is a router that has three interfaces.
e0 to the internal network and two serial routes out to the internet. The
policy is all www traffic will go through S2 and all other traffic will go
through S1. There is an IP policy route (route map) on e0 to accomplish
e a BGP session with a router at the other end that has an
ip of 10.0.0.2. You are 10.0.0.1. If you have a route-map applied to
the interface that is to match the BGP advertisements to an ACL for
permission and that ACL is filtering for 10.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/16,
etc, the router WILL ACCEPT
George,
Why would you put both on an interface. If your using
a route map you have to call the access-lists you
need.
Bill
--- george <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Theory question:
> If a route-map and an input acess list are on the
> same interface what is the
> order of p
dosen`t the route map USE the access list to get it`s address from???
i.e
router ospf 1
network 172.16.10.2 0.0.0.0 area 5
ip classless
access-list 1 permit 192.168.*.* *
"this is created but needs to be called"
route-map griffy permit 10
match ip address 1
"this statement C
>Theory question:
>If a route-map and an input acess list are on the same interface what is the
>order of processing?
>1. Do packets go through the access list first then proccessed by route map?
>2. Does the route-map go first and if so, do the packets then go to the
>access l
I think that the access list should have priority
-Original Message-
From: george [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 January 2001 04:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: question on route map + access list on same interface
Theory question:
If a route-map and an input acess list are on
Theory question:
If a route-map and an input acess list are on the same interface what is the
order of processing?
1. Do packets go through the access list first then proccessed by route map?
2. Does the route-map go first and if so, do the packets then go to the
access list for processing or are
While route-map is an advanced feature to
>redistridute routes or to subject packets to policy routing. For example,
>you can define two default gateways in one router by using route-map and
>policy routing.
>
>Sophie
>
>"shanjun zou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
distribute-list is used to exchange the routing information between two
different routing protocols. While route-map is an advanced feature to
redistridute routes or to subject packets to policy routing. For example,
you can define two default gateways in one router by using route-map and
policy
hi guyes,
I am studying the bscn, but I was fused about the command route-map,
distribute-list&filter-list, who can tell me?
thank a lot.
Best regards,
shanjun zou
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re
Use a route map. This is a newer feature. Check that it will work on your
version of IOS. It is also known as policy based routing.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c
/qcpart1/qcpolicy.htm#5351
Create a route map.
router#(config) route-map A permit 10
explain what the right hand bit of the extended Access-list
> does below. This is taken from a router running an in-bound route map for
> BGP. This is used to reject routes.
>
>
> Steve
>
>
> route-map peer-in deny 10
> match ip address 100
>
> route-map peer-in pe
Hi,
Could someone explain what the right hand bit of the extended Access-list
does below. This is taken from a router running an in-bound route map for
BGP. This is used to reject routes.
Steve
route-map peer-in deny 10
match ip address 100
route-map peer-in permit 20
set local-preference
Francisco.
Subramanian Nallasivam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje de
noticias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Tapas,
>
>Route map is used for controlling and modify routing information.
> This is done by definfing conditions for distributing routes from one
>
Hi Tapas,
Route map is used for controlling and modify routing information.
This is done by definfing conditions for distributing routes from one
routing protocol to another or controlling routing information when
injected in and out of BGP. Hope this helps.
Thanks,
-Subbi.
Tapas Das
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
