In match IP address , which Ip address are you trying to match?
ramesh ,ccnp
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com
Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com
Bid for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. Just log on to
http://air
Subject: Policy routing with
route map [7:70567]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi guys ,
Just wanna to ask can loading balacing achieve in this config. Or e1 is use
only , follow by e2 unless e1 is down.
interface serial e0
ip policy route-map ABC
!
route-map ABC
match ip address X.X.X.X
set interface e1 e2 e3 e4
Thank you !
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstu
going to
have to go another route for now.
- Original Message -
From: "Erick B."
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: Policy Routing on the 3550? [7:64074]
> route-map isn't listed as a command in the
> documentation so it's probably something
route-map isn't listed as a command in the
documentation so it's probably something from full IOS
that isn't supported. They may add support in the
future.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12112cea/3550scg/swuncli.htm#xtocid24
Unsupported route map commands on 3550 (lates
PBR is not available in current image.
I understand it will be available soon.
- Original Message -
From: "W. Alan Robertson"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:04 AM
Subject: Policy Routing on the 3550? [7:64074]
> Howdy folks...
>
> I need to set the next hop
t there are commands that appear in the IOS
menus, and there are commands that you can enter and receive no error
message. And they still have no effect.
guessing now, but because of the experiences above, I would suggest that
policy routing is not supported in the 3550 IOS at this time.
one of
Howdy folks...
I need to set the next hop on a 3550 (with the EMI Image) based on the
protocol type. We've got a number of transparent proxy servers, each
one handling a different type of traffic (One for HTTP... One for
SMTP... Etc.).
No problem, right? Wrong.
Merrily, I configured my acces
You can do this with route maps,
A search on google for route map cisco gave the first result as:
! Enable policy routing
interface Ethernet0
ip policy route-map proxy-redirect
! Route to proxy server
route-map proxy-redirect permit 10
match ip address 110
set ip next-hop 10.11.12.13
Dear Fahim
Here
Define The traffic for policy routing:
access-list 150 tcp any any eq smtp
Then Make a Route-map policy
route-map permit
match ip address 150
set ip next-hop
Now assign it to some interface:
Interface configuration mode>ip pol
""fahim"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Guys
> Need Help in Policy Routing. I have a Cisco 2610 router with Pix behind,
The
> 2610 has two WAN Connections, S0-256Kbps leased line and ATM0-DSL line
> 512Kbps, going to two differenct ISP, with differen
Hi Guys
Need Help in Policy Routing. I have a Cisco 2610 router with Pix behind, The
2610 has two WAN Connections, S0-256Kbps leased line and ATM0-DSL line
512Kbps, going to two differenct ISP, with different IP addresses.E0 will
connect to PIX outside interface,
I need to configure SMTP Traffic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the through reply and the verifying that I have a decent grip
on policy routing. I'm less concerned that i'm not following the
author's train of thought than I am the the concept in general.
I agree that I muddied the wat
>
>
> I've been reading the Cisco CCNP Cert Guide in partial preparation for
> the BSCI exan and I've come across a bit in the Policy Routing section
> that I just don't understand.
>
> The text states:
>
> "Policy routing does not allow traffic sent
ance
(a DoH/DMR Consulting Alliance)
* Phone: (+61) 8 9318 6257
* Fax: (+61) 8 9318 6390
* Mobile: (+61) 41 731 0578
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Matney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 August 2002 9:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Policy Routing Qu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been reading the Cisco CCNP Cert Guide in partial preparation for
the BSCI exan and I've come across a bit in the Policy Routing section
that I just don't understand.
The text states:
"Policy routing does not allow traff
sgroups: groupstudy.cisco
Sent: Tuesday, 04 June, 2002 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Policy routing - directly connected interfaces [7:45628]
> You asking if its directly connected would it be switched and not effected
> by policy routing? i think not. To my understanding any packet destined
for
> a
You asking if its directly connected would it be switched and not effected
by policy routing? i think not. To my understanding any packet destined for
a remote desination that is directly connected or via a next hop would be
routed and subject to your policy. This is strange.
Ip local policy
of last resort on the edge/NAT routers, nor does policy routing
on the central router permit anything other than packets with a source that
was created by the NAT process.
Chuck
""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Check o
Check out page 819 of Doyle Vol 1. "ip local policy route-map"
HTH
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 12:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Policy routing - directly connected interfaces [7:45628]
Continued policy routing testing of a customer network simulation in my lab
has revealed something of interest to me. Can't find a revelation in the
config and command references on CCO.
I have a policy set up such that packets with a particular source address
and a particular destin
Hi Rudy,
I find the following links on the Cisco site useful; you probably have found
them already yourself. Just from personal experience, remember that policy
routing can put a heavy load on your router, so be careful when you
implement it.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/protocol
Hey guys,
If anybody has any good links or reading material on Policy routing please
respond to this posting. I really want to get it down. Ive searched
everywehere and found about 3 links on the Cisco Website with pertinent
information. If anybody knows where i can find all about policy
Should be obvious when considered logically. But one can never trust logic
when it comes to how things work
Policy can be applied on a subinterface by subinterface basis.
Policies applied to the physical interface have no effect on traffic
arriving via the subinterface
Policies do not apply to
Yes, you can do this on a subinterface. I was doing it just
yesterday in conjunction with an IPsec, GRE, NAT, and policy
routing scenario. And -- surprisingly -- it worked!
John
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Chuck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Just verifying something I am seeing in my
Just verifying something I am seeing in my lab.
All examples of policy routing that I can find, both in Doyle and on CCO,
show policy routing as taking place on the physical interface. I can find no
examples indicating that policies can be set on a subinterface.
However, I am finding in my lab
Is it possible to tag routes (via an IGP or BGP) and then perform
a policy route decision which in part does a check for this tag?
Specifically, the logic I'm looking for is a route-map which is
applied in the packet forwarding phase which will change the forwarding
behavior if the packet is for
Recall that unlike access lists, if no match is found in a route map, the
packet is forwarded through the normal routing process. If you look at the
routing table, is the next hop for the destination 10.1.1.2?
""Dovelet"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
Hi all,
I have a question about policy route and I hope someone can help me. The
Cisco router's config is as follow:
:
:
interface ethernet0
ip policy route-map route1
!
route-map route1 10
match ip address 11
match ip next-hop 12
set ip next-hop 10.1.1.2
!
access-list 11 permi
> Is it me or does BGP not allow you to form a peering session unless you
have
> a route to the host in the routing table, no matter what.
Yes, eBGP won`t form a session if the peer address is not in
its route table.
> It closes
> connected sessions even if I have policy route data forwarding co
Is it me or does BGP not allow you to form a peering session unless you have
a route to the host in the routing table, no matter what. It closes
connected sessions even if I have policy route data forwarding configured
and even if traffic is forwarding correctly. Is there some knob I'm
forgettin
Hi,
I have a 3640 acting as a one-arm router to route between vlans. I would
like to apply policy routing from vlan1 so that traffic leaving vlan2 from
vlan1 is policy routed and traffic leaving vlan2 from other sources sees no
policy.
Is this possible even though policy routing affects
Hey guys,
Can u help me on this?
I have a 2610, and i have 2 leased line, is there a way that i can
balance the load?
thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16529&t=16529
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Hi;
Policy Routing sample
interface serial 0
ip address x.w.y.z /netmask
ip policy route-map frank
!
access-list 101 permit ip any 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.25
!
route-map frank permt 10
match ip address 101
set
How about this?:
access-list 100 permit ip any 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 100
Then on the interface do a priority-group 1
At 03:32 AM 5/21/01, you wrote:
>Hi folks,
>I like to setup a policy so that any traffic destined to 1.1.1.0/24 will
>take precedence over the r
Hi folks,
I like to setup a policy so that any traffic destined to 1.1.1.0/24 will
take precedence over the rest. My outbound link is a single T1. Please
throw me a short sample config. Thanks for helping.
-Frank
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5227&t=5227
. If they are indeed in the same subnet, then does the policy-map really
'route' to 1.1.1.1? (show route-map)
3. Do you understanding policy routing and the purpose of performing it?
(show ip policy)
4. Have you checked the status of the ACL used for the route-map? (show
access-list 1)
5
Hi,
I am having problem with my policy routing, hope that anyone can help me.
1) 1.1.1.1 is a low-end router connected to my high-end router ( multihomed,
running HSRP).
2) 1.1.1.1 is in VLAN 154
3) 5.5.5.1 is the another neighbour router peering with my high-router
router.
The problem is
d Networkers you can buy the tape of the session.
--David
- Original Message -
From: "Curtis Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: Fast-switched policy routing forwarding ta
Hello,
Does anyone know if source-based policy-routing entries are entered
in the cache in the form of or or ?
What I am trying to establish is whether a seperate route table look up is performed
for every unique source-destination pair, or whether since it is source-base policy
routed
I was wondering whether anyone has been able to determine the approximate
level of increased CPU utilization that is introduced by policy routing.
Also, whether Netflow, CEF or any other known means has been used
successfully to establish flow information and faster switching using
policy
.2
> > >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, vtam wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't really know how the policy routing run.
> > > > This is my quetion: i want to apply policy routing accordin
What i want to do is how to backup. It is always have serveral path to a
Network 1, let's said path A,B,C. I want the traffic from 172.16.0.0 to 1
always go path A, but is path A down, i want the traffic go the best path in
routing table to Net1( Maybe B or C, according to the IGP).
So how should
read, and hence a bit more confusing.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of vtam
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Policy routing question
But the route table is learn through dyna
1 is down, it will use 172.1.1.2
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, vtam wrote:
> >
> > > I don't really know how the policy routing run.
> > > This is my quetion: i want to apply policy routing according to the
>
e hops on the "set ip next-hop" line.like:
>
> route-map test permit 10
> match ip address 1
> set ip next-hop 172.1.1.1 172.1.1.2
>
> if 172.1.1.1 is down, it will use 172.1.1.2
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, vtam wrote:
>
> > I d
now how the policy routing run.
> This is my quetion: i want to apply policy routing according to the source,
> but when the set next-hop is not accessible, it should be route as normal
> routing process( route according to dest. ip address).
>
> This is the config i do.
>
>
I don't really know how the policy routing run.
This is my quetion: i want to apply policy routing according to the source,
but when the set next-hop is not accessible, it should be route as normal
routing process( route according to dest. ip address).
This is the config i do.
int ser 1
rieu wrote:
> I swear the digressions will be the death of me yet!
>
> I've been reading up on route-maps and policy routing. Got to thinking about
> something one of my associates at work said to me. He likes to use policy
> routing as a means of securing networks in extranet si
I swear the digressions will be the death of me yet!
I've been reading up on route-maps and policy routing. Got to thinking about
something one of my associates at work said to me. He likes to use policy
routing as a means of securing networks in extranet situations. You know -
central
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> this is basic setup :-)
> i'm thinking on something more complicated so i want to keep policy routing
> :-)
Assuming you are doing policy routing with a route map, you would use
something like...
route-map foobar permit 10
match ip addres
this is basic setup :-)
i'm thinking on something more complicated so i want to keep policy routing
:-)
---
Gabriel Neagoe, GN379-RIPE
Networking solutions consultant
Cisco Certified Network Professional
Cisco Certified Design Associate
S&T Ro
Not using policy routing, it's actually much simpler than that.
...
ip classless
ip subnet-zero
int serial 0
ip addr 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
backup-interface serial 1
!
int serial 1
ip addr 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
...
Alternately, you can have a route with a higher administrative distance
Hello,
if you configure policy routing to route certain packets through interface
S0
is there a way to automatically redirect packets through interface S1 if S0
is down ?
thanks,
---
Gabriel Neagoe, GN379-RIPE
Networking solutions consultant
Cisco
At 09:53 AM 7/4/00 -0700, Cormac Long wrote:
>There are 2 problems with the route-map.
>
>1. Syntax should be "set ip next-hop serial0"
>2. There is no match in the map for 192.168.2.0 so
>those packets will get dropped.
>
I agree with point#1, but not point#2. The original route-map was like so
Try changing the set interface to set next-hop. Use set next hop when you
know the next hop address. In your case: change "set interface serial0"
to "set ip next-hop 192.168.3.2" and "set interface serial1" to "set ip
next-hop 192.168.4.2"
When you said that your configuration wasn't working; w
There are 2 problems with the route-map.
1. Syntax should be "set ip next-hop serial0"
2. There is no match in the map for 192.168.2.0 so
those packets will get dropped.
Correct config should be:
route-map test permit 10
> match ip address 10
> set ip next-hop interface serial0
>
> route-map
Hi guys,
Please see configurations below :
ISP A owned 192.168.1.0/24 and ISP B owned
192.168.2.0/24
ISP
A ISP
B
|
|
|
|
serial0
serial1
ethernet0 -> using secondary ad
I've been thinking of using policy routing to handle some "special"
situations in my network. Since this is process switched (on my 7513) what
kind of performance hit should I expect? My route maps will most likely
only be for < 10 networks / destinations. I'll hav
59 matches
Mail list logo
